Search Results for: pipeline

Justin Trudeau: A Cartoon Chronology

Justin Trudeau

A Cartoon Chronology | Sunday March 9, 2025 | Newsletter 20

As Justin Trudeau’s tenure as Canada’s Prime Minister nears its conclusion, the legacy he leaves is one of significant achievements, notable controversies, and enduring challenges. Over the past decade, Trudeau’s leadership has been a focal point for both admiration and criticism, capturing the complexities of his role in Canadian politics. As an editorial cartoonist, I have spent two decades chronicling his political journey, each cartoon encapsulating pivotal moments from his rise in 2015 to his leadership milestones and the trials he has faced.

My perspective was shaped by an unforgettable moment at the 2012 convention of the Association of Canadian Cartoonists in Montreal. During this event, Trudeau, then a backbench MP, mingled with us, embodying a blend of charisma and strategic foresight. In a memorable theatrical gesture, he donned his father’s iconic buckskin coat, declaring with a grin, “The jacket fits,” symbolizing his embrace of legacy and hinting at his political ambitions. This charming performance was an early indicator of his potential to lead the Liberal Party, foreshadowing the influential role he would come to play in shaping Canada’s political landscape. Charming, though not to the extent that I was ever lenient to the poor fellow. Through my cartoons, I’ve captured the essence of Trudeau’s journey, from my viewpoint, reflecting on the lasting impact he has made on the nation.

October 23, 2004

October 23, 2004 – Legacy matrimonial

This is my first drawing of Justin Trudeau capturing the occasion of his marriage to Sophie Grégoire Trudeau. Beside him looms a hulking monument to his father, the elder Trudeau, symbolizing the enigma and legacy that accompany Justin. The humor in this piece lies in the idea that with the marriage came the Trudeau legacy, hinting at Justin’s future path and the destiny seemingly foretold by his riding on his father’s coattails to power, which he achieved a decade later. Sadly, the bonds of marriage did not endure, and the couple eventually faced divorce, adding another layer to the complexities of his personal and political journey.

January 12, 2007

January 12, 2007 – Team… it is Time

As his path to leadership became clearer, Justin Trudeau emerged during a time when the Liberal government under Paul Martin was faltering. The power wielded by the party since Jean Chrétien’s era was waning, and Trudeau, young and charismatic, with his iconic hair and appeal, became the face of a new generation. By January 12, 2007, he was the rising star ready to fill the political void in the riding of Outremont, embodying both his father’s legacy and his own promise of renewed leadership for the Liberals.

September 28, 2012

September 28, 2012 – Trudeau parting the Liberal Red Sea

The Liberal Party, bruised from the faltering leaderships of Stéphane Dion and Michael Ignatieff, was ready for a new icon. Enter Justin Trudeau, likened to Moses parting the Red Sea, symbolizing his rise as a potential saviour for the party. Amidst the wave of “Justinmania,” he stood out among other hopefuls, signalling his readiness to lead with charisma and youthful vigour. Interestingly, as Trudeau made his move, Mark Carney, the central banker, was parting ways on the right, set to take on new challenges as Trudeau stepped into the spotlight.

November 17, 2015 – Growing into Defence

November 17, 2015

Justin Trudeau had just taken power and announced plans at a G20 summit for Canada to withdraw warplanes from ISIS combat missions, shifting focus to training local troops instead. This decision highlighted his preference for a more cautious, resistance-oriented approach to military involvement. His stance with NATO further underscored this, as he openly acknowledged at meetings that Canada had no intention of meeting the alliance’s spending commitments. These decisions would later be scrutinized, especially as geopolitical tensions evolved, and Canada became relegated to bit player status in global strategy. A decade later, in 2025, with figures like Trump influencing global politics, Trudeau’s earlier choices might be seen as missteps, potentially weakening Canada’s standing in international defence and diplomacy.

May 20, 2016

May 20, 2016 – Elbowgate

An involved Justin Trudeau in a commotion in the House of Commons. While trying to expedite a vote on Bill C-14 regarding physician-assisted death, Trudeau accidentally elbowed NDP MP Ruth Ellen Brosseau while attempting to guide Conservative MP Gord Brown through a group of NDP MPs. This led to significant criticism and multiple apologies from Trudeau. The cartoon depicting Trudeau in King Henry VIII garb, took inspiration from the miniseries “The Tudors”, with the parody “The Trudors,” contextualizing the dramatic nature of the event and Trudeau’s subsequent apologies, using the historical drama as a backdrop to highlight the theatrical aspects of the political mishap. I’ve depicted him as a King dealing with revolt, and alongside his royal family. In terms of the real monarchy, sometimes he got along, sometimes not so much.

June 22, 2018

June 22, 2018: Prime Minister of Pot

Justin Trudeau is often celebrated for his role in legalizing cannabis in Canada, a move that aligned with global trends as other countries and several U.S. states had already moved in this direction. Recognizing the progressive momentum, Trudeau’s government made cannabis legalization official, marking a historic moment for the nation. Trudeau, adorned in cannabis-themed robes captures the excitement and significance of ending nearly a century of prohibition, highlighting the cultural and political impact of this milestone in Canadian history. Though there are critics, the cartoon underscores the celebratory atmosphere surrounding this transformative policy change, and for many, the one and only consequential legacy for this Prime Minister.

May 28, 2019

May 28, 2019: Politics done as always

Justin Trudeau, who declared himself a feminist Prime Minister by establishing a gender-balanced cabinet, faced challenges to this agenda during the SNC-Lavalin scandal. The cartoon illustrates cracks in his feminist stance, highlighted by the resignations of Jody Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott. These high-profile departures exposed tensions in achieving gender-balanced governance, as both women chose to run as independents, expressing dissatisfaction with party politics. This moment questioned the depth of Trudeau’s feminist commitments, capturing a significant discourse on gender and politics in Canada.

July 23, 2019

July 23, 2019: Boil Water Advisory

The cartoon depicts Justin Trudeau as the “Little Hero of Reconciliation,” suggesting that while he addresses minor issues, major concerns like clean water access in Indigenous communities persist. This criticism points to ongoing struggles in achieving genuine reconciliation and fuels accusations that Trudeau is more of a virtue signaller than a doer. Despite receiving credit for highlighting the struggles of Indigenous peoples, he is seen as falling short in tackling the more challenging calls to action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, reflecting a gap between his public commitments and substantive action.

April 11, 2018

April 11, 2018: The Green Transition PM

The cartoon illustrates Trudeau’s carbon pricing plan as a split personality, reflecting the balancing act between environmental goals and controversial oil subsidies. This depiction captures the tension in his energy strategy, especially concerning the Trans Mountain pipeline during his tenure. While Trudeau’s government is credited for implementing a carbon pricing mechanism and committing to net-zero emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement, the green transition is complicated by billions of federal dollars in subsidies to the oil and gas sector. Added to the ire, carve outs for regions that just so happen to overwhelmingly vote Liberal.  This dual approach underscores the challenges of pursuing environmental ambitions while navigating economic and industry pressures.

March 7, 2019

March 7, 2019: Sinking of The SNC Lavalin Scandal

The SNC-Lavalin scandal is symbolized by a sinking ship, with Trudeau rowing away in a lifeboat, his principal secretary and confidant, Gerald Butts, is depicted as the captain going down with the ship. This imagery portrays Butts as the sacrificial lamb, absorbing some of the political fallout to shield Trudeau. Despite this significant resignation, Trudeau managed to survive the controversy, and the scandal eventually faded after the Liberals retained power in the following federal election. This highlights the shifting dynamics within Trudeau’s inner circle and the broader political landscape.

September 11, 2020

September 11, 2020: WE do it all for you (and me)

WE Charity in dust, shows the Kielburger brothers running a fast-food restaurant, symbolizing the charity’s dissolution and the ethical issues that surfaced within Trudeau’s administration. This imagery challenges the integrity of Trudeau’s leadership, reflecting the broader perception of scandals during his tenure. A poll conducted by Angus-Reid as Trudeau’s era drew to a close revealed that respondents most remembered his leadership for COVID-19, followed closely by themes of scandal and corruption, including the WE Charity, SNC-Lavalin, and Blackface incidents. These controversies have left a lasting impression on Trudeau’s legacy, highlighting the challenges faced by his administration in maintaining public trust.

March 20, 2021

March 20, 2021: Vaccine life support

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed a significant vulnerability in Canada’s healthcare infrastructure: the glaring lack of domestic vaccine production capability. Procurement was slow. This limitation became evident as Canada relied heavily on international partners, particularly the U.S., for vaccine doses. Then there was mixing of vaccine remedies. The situation underscored the importance of investing in domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing to enhance self-sufficiency and preparedness for future health crises. This realization has likely prompted discussions about strengthening Canada’s domestic production capacity to ensure greater resilience in the face of global health challenges.

June 2, 2021

June 2, 2021: Gesture Politician

During his tenure, Justin Trudeau presided over a period of national self-reflection, and self-loathing, marked by actions like the toppling of Sir John A. Macdonald statues, as Canada confronted its colonial past and injustices against Indigenous peoples. The historical investigative review of Prime Ministerial misdeeds could be best described as ‘selective’ for MacKenzie King up to Jean Chretien. While Trudeau emphasized reconciliation through symbolic gestures, his pandemic measures were viewed by some as overbearing, turning him into a lightning rod for criticism among Canadians discontented with both his handling of historical wrongs and his approach to the COVID-19 crisis from pretty vicious anti-vaxxers.

August 26, 2021

August 26, 2021: First Minister Struggles

Justin Trudeau’s leadership reflects a complex interplay between his housing crisis management, immigration policy, and the symbolic state of the Prime Minister’s residence at 24 Sussex. By increasing immigration levels without provincial capacity guarantees, the housing market and essential services have faced added strain. His national housing plan sought to alleviate these pressures by making homeownership more attainable amid rising demand and prices. Meanwhile, his decision not to renovate 24 Sussex symbolizes fiscal restraint but contrasts with the broader housing challenges. This situation underscores the need for coordinated federal and provincial efforts to ensure sustainable growth and livable conditions for all Canadians.

Raising concern about Trudeau's governance due to issues like ArriveCAN mismanagement, CERB problems, and potential pitfalls of rushed decisions for political support, such as quick deals on Pharmacare and Dental care.

February 29, 2024

February 29, 2024: Serviette Policy Planning

The cartoon critiques Justin Trudeau’s governance style as one characterized by costly and hasty decisions, aimed at securing support from the NDP in a minority parliament. It highlights a series of expensive policy plans and missteps, including Pharmacare, Dentalcare, Childcare, poor accounting of CERB, the migrant influx, and the ArriveCan app. These initiatives are portrayed as rushed and inadequately planned, akin to “napkin-sketched” ideas such as the Pharmacare deal, reflecting a pattern of expensive schemes. The cartoon urges Canadians to demand greater accountability and transparency from the government, emphasizing the need for well-considered and fiscally responsible policymaking.

Justin Trudeau’s years in office have been a blend of ambitious goals, personal milestones, and political challenges. From his early rise bolstered by his father’s legacy to becoming Prime Minister, Trudeau’s leadership is marked by both achievements and controversies. He has advanced progressive policies like cannabis legalization and a gender-balanced cabinet but faced criticism for scandals like SNC-Lavalin and WE Charity, as well as for policy decisions that seemed rushed or poorly executed. One of his greatest failings was carrying through with electoral reform. His approach to immigration, healthcare, and environmental policies shows a complex balance between ideals and practical governance. While his legacy includes significant strides in social and environmental areas, it is also shaped by the controversies, embarrassments, and criticisms of his administration. Trudeau’s leadership highlights the need for transparency, accountability, and strategic planning to ensure a resilient and inclusive future for Canada.

Thank you to everyone who continues to subscribe to this weekly newsletter! I typically release posts every Saturday morning, offering a summary of the week through my editorial cartoons. My aim is to keep you informed without overwhelming you with constant notifications. Throughout the week, I also share daily ‘notes’ on my Substack, which enrich my weekly newsletters and feature animated versions of my daily cartoons.

Please Subscribe. It’s free!

Friday January 17, 2025

Alberta must balance its oil interests with national unity, aligning with other provinces to strengthen Canada's position against potential U.S. tariffs.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday January 17, 2025, and The Toronto Star

Balancing Provinces and Prioritizing Canada: A Call for Unity

A distracted and weakened federal government has created a leadership vacuum, forcing the provinces to step up in addressing the existential challenges posed by a potential second Trump presidency.

December 18, 2024

In the complex landscape of international trade and economic diplomacy, Canada’s provincial leaders are faced with the challenge of balancing regional interests with national priorities. The recent discussions around potential tariffs from the incoming U.S. administration have underscored the necessity for a unified Canadian front. However, Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith’s divergent stance has sparked a debate that goes beyond provincial borders, touching on the very essence of Canadian unity and national strategy.

Alberta’s economic landscape is undeniably tied to its oil industry, a sector that has been a cornerstone of the province’s prosperity and a significant contributor to the national economy. The oil sands have not only fuelled Alberta’s growth but have also been a lifeline for Canada, providing jobs, energy security, and substantial revenues. For Premier Smith, prioritizing Alberta’s interests is not only a political necessity but also a reflection of her commitment to her constituents who depend on this vital industry.

News: Premiers talk tactics for a game of tariff chicken

Canada's fragmented political leadership, from a weak federal government to self-serving provincial premiers, leaves the nation vulnerable amid escalating crises such as Trump’s erratic return to power and his punitive tariff threats.

December 3, 2024

Yet, as Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford aptly put it, “Our country comes first.” In times of external threats, such as the looming tariffs that could destabilize the Canadian economy, unity becomes paramount. The strength of a nation lies in its ability to stand together, to prioritize collective well-being over regional gains. This is where the balance must be struck—between advocating for provincial interests and aligning with a national strategy that safeguards all Canadians.

Smith’s decision to distance herself from the consensus reached by her fellow premiers raises questions about the broader implications of her stance. While her focus on Alberta’s oil industry is understandable, her approach risks isolating the province at a time when cohesion is crucial. By not joining the collective effort, Alberta may inadvertently weaken its negotiating power, as well as that of the entire country.

Doug Ford’s leadership in rallying the premiers reflects a commitment to presenting a united front, essential in negotiations with a complex and unpredictable U.S. administration. His message is clear: while every province has its unique needs and priorities, these should not overshadow the importance of national unity. A fragmented approach only serves to undermine Canada’s position on the global stage and risks playing into the hands of those who might benefit from division.

Opinion: Alberta’s premier is playing right into Donald Trump’s hands

February 7, 2023

In this context, it is imperative for Premier Smith to reconsider her strategy. By aligning more closely with her fellow premiers, she can advocate effectively for Alberta while contributing to a stronger, more cohesive national strategy. This does not mean abandoning Alberta’s interests but rather integrating them into a broader Canadian framework that seeks to protect the entire nation’s economic future.

The path forward requires collaboration, dialogue, and a willingness to put Canada’s collective interests at the forefront. As the country navigates these uncertain times, all provinces, led by their premiers, must work together to ensure that Canada’s voice is unified and its position strengthened. Only then can we effectively safeguard our economy, our sovereignty, and our future in a rapidly changing global landscape.

The Premiers meeting this week was a real eye-opener, showing just how tricky it can be to balance provincial and federal interests. And right in the thick of it is Alberta’s Premier, Danielle Smith, who’s found herself in a bit of an awkward spot. Why, you ask? Well, aside from her odd chumminess with Donald Trump—seriously, a weekend jaunt to Mar-a-Lago and plans to attend his inauguration?—she’s been steering Alberta in a direction that’s causing some raised eyebrows.

Smith’s focus on protecting Alberta’s oil industry makes sense given its importance to the province’s economy. But here’s the rub: oil is a hot-button issue, especially as we push towards green energy. Meanwhile, Canada’s trying to juggle putting a price on carbon while still propping up the fossil fuel industry. It’s a bit of a head-scratcher, really—oil revenues are crucial not just for Alberta, but for the federal government too, providing jobs and fuelling budgets.

Then there’s Trump’s looming 25% tariffs, which could seriously mess with the Canadian economy. Right now, it’s all about playing the waiting game to see if these tariffs will hit us across the board, or if, fingers crossed, oil might get a pass given the U.S.’s reliance on it.

Now, here’s where it gets even more tangled. Ontario’s Premier, Doug Ford, is rallying for a united front against these tariffs, saying we should protect our own turf but always put Canada first. It’s a solid point, given that oil is our ace in the hole—a big bargaining chip in the face of Trump’s wild tariff plans. But Smith’s solo approach could undermine this strategy.

The way I see it, Alberta needs to think about joining forces with the other provinces. A united stance gives us a stronger hand to play on the world stage, ensuring we protect both provincial and national interests. By weaving Alberta’s oil concerns into a broader Canadian strategy, we can amplify our voice globally and maybe, just maybe, take some wind out of Trump’s tariff sails.

So, what’s next? It’s a delicate dance, this one. But one thing’s for sure: how Alberta chooses to move forward could tip the balance for all of Canada. Let’s hope they choose wisely. Things can get very ugly, indeed.

I tossed a question out to my social media followers, asking for their take on Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s advice to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith regarding the Trump tariffs: “…protect your jurisdiction but country comes first, Canada’s the priority.” The overwhelming sentiment leaned in favour of Ford, yet the responses shed light on a deeper divide. Many pointed out that Alberta has often found itself at odds with the rest of Canada, citing examples like stalled pipeline expansions and the Keystone XL debacle. Some argue Smith was elected to defend Alberta’s interests, especially when those interests seem sidelined by national strategies. Others highlighted Alberta’s role as a major contributor to federal transfer payments, questioning why it should shoulder the burden without due consideration. A sentiment echoed was Alberta feeling like the 51st state, as its interests are perceived to be overridden by Ontario’s convenience. Meanwhile, some viewed Ford’s comment as perhaps his smartest yet, though motives were questioned—is it genuine, or just a strategic move for votes? The debate underscores the complex dynamics of provincial versus national priorities in Canada, and how this tension plays into the broader tariff negotiations.

Enjoy the January 17, 2025 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday or Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday November 13, 2024

COP29 is unfolding as a display of contradictions and empty promises, as world leaders skirt climate responsibilities amid worsening global disasters and the resurgence of climate crisis denial.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday November 13, 2024

As the Climate Crisis Worsens, COP29 Feels Like a Show Without Substance

November 18, 2022

As COP29 opens in Azerbaijan, this year’s UN climate summit has quickly become less about hope and more about the world’s inability—or unwillingness—to unite on the climate crisis. The event has turned into a forum of empty promises and political theatrics, leaving little to encourage those looking for serious, concrete action. With catastrophic climate events mounting worldwide and the incoming U.S. administration preparing to withdraw from the Paris Accord, we are rapidly moving from a critical juncture to a dangerous decline in global climate cooperation.

The backdrop to COP29 is a world grappling with relentless climate disasters. In the U.S., North Carolina was battered by unprecedented flooding, while wildfires and smoke in California and New York have turned once-safe communities into danger zones. Across the Atlantic, Spain’s Valencia recently experienced its worst floods in modern history. Scientists warn that each year of inaction accelerates the damage, yet the atmosphere at COP29 is anything but urgent. This is underscored by the absence of major players. President Joe Biden skipped the conference altogether following Trump’s election victory, while China sent only a deputy and the European Commission’s President Ursula von der Leyen stayed away entirely.

News: Why Is a Petrostate Holding This Year’s Climate Talks?

December 17, 2022

Without the presence of such key world leaders, the climate talks risk becoming what frustrated observers see as little more than a stage for empty rhetoric. That’s further compounded by the rhetoric from Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, who used his keynote to lambast Western critics of his country’s oil industry rather than championing true climate action. His speech, coupled with remarks from UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres about the absurdity of doubling down on fossil fuels, shows the fractured reality: a tug-of-war between national interests and the well-being of the planet.

With climate finance taking centre stage, wealthy nations are once again being called to pay a fair share. For more than a decade, these countries have promised, and often failed, to mobilize $100 billion per year to support developing nations in mitigating climate impacts and shifting to cleaner energy. Canada, for instance, increased its pledge to $5.3 billion over five years, a figure that many argue is far too modest for the nation’s historical emissions contribution. Even with some countries pushing for increased commitments, the existing funding falls drastically short of the UN’s estimated need of $1.46 trillion annually by 2030—a figure that dwarfs current pledges and feels insurmountable given the economic and political landscapes.

News: COP29 climate summit host Azerbaijan lashes out at West in defence of oil and gas industry

November 10, 2021

Reader responses capture the growing discontent: many Canadians feel their tax dollars are being wasted on foreign climate pledges while fossil fuel subsidies at home keep the industry alive and well. Despite climate commitments, Canada continues to hand billions in subsidies to oil and gas sectors, mirroring a broader global hypocrisy. Meanwhile, developing nations who suffer the harshest climate impacts are left struggling to access funds while shouldering mounting debts.

Casting a dark shadow over COP29 is the election of Donald Trump, who has vowed to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Accord for the second time. This move threatens to destabilize any fragile climate consensus and will make America, the world’s largest historic carbon emitter, a climate rogue. With the U.S. pivoting away from international climate commitments, other nations may follow suit, leaving the Paris Accord toothless. Trump’s resurgence has emboldened climate denial and encouraged other fossil fuel interests, making it seem as though the world is stepping backward just as the effects of climate change become impossible to ignore.

One of the most damning aspects of the climate negotiations is the dual-track approach to funding. On one hand, wealthy nations direct money to initiatives like the Green Climate Fund, which funds renewable energy projects in low-income countries. On the other, these same countries funnel billions into fossil fuel subsidies to maintain their own energy security and economy. This two-faced approach not only undercuts climate finance but undermines the entire notion of a “green transition.” These contradictions leave everyday people wondering if the “green” in “green transition” refers more to money than to true environmental commitment.

News: How much does Canada owe in climate aid? A trillion-dollar question headlines COP29

Canada's Environment Minister, Steven Guilbeault, faces internal conflict within the Liberal government due to a sudden policy reversal on climate change, particularly the exemption for home-heating oil in Atlantic Canada, sparking criticism and raising concerns about the coherence and consistency of the government's climate policies.

November 4, 2023

Adding insult to injury, many climate finance contributions come as loans rather than grants, which traps poorer countries in debt rather than giving them the tools to build strong, independent green economies. Despite Canada’s pledge to move toward a 50-50 split between grants and loans, this ratio falls far short of the 60-40 split advocated by environmental groups. For small island nations and low-income countries already crippled by climate impacts, these loans feel like a betrayal.

The tragedy of COP29 is not just that it’s failing to deliver, but that it risks becoming irrelevant. With other global priorities—security, economic inflation, geopolitical conflicts—taking precedence, the climate crisis is slipping down the agenda for the countries most responsible for the damage. If wealthy nations remain unwilling to either act at home or support vulnerable nations abroad, the question will become not how we stop the climate crisis, but how we survive it.

The increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires devastating towns like Jasper, Alberta, and others across North America, driven by climate change and exacerbated by inadequate responses and continued fossil fuel reliance, underscore the urgent need for decisive action beyond mere "thoughts and prayers."

July 30, 2024

The reality is bleak. In a world where wealthy nations hedge their bets on fossil fuel stability while paying lip service to climate goals, climate summits like COP29 become pageants of performative diplomacy rather than engines of change. The urgency of the climate crisis demands more than grandstanding; it requires coordinated global sacrifice and an unwavering commitment to real, painful change. Until world leaders confront their own contradictions and take true responsibility, every COP will be a hollow gathering of bluster, hypocrisy, and lost opportunity.

It’s time for action, not theatrics. We may not get another chance.

As COP29 opens in Azerbaijan, the climate summit spotlights a series of contradictions that paint a picture more of hypocrisy than of hope. In his keynote, Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev dismissed Western criticisms of his country’s oil reliance as “slander and blackmail.” His stance underscores the global paradox—leaders encourage a green transition but often default to fossil fuels, not least in resource-rich nations.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres followed Aliyev’s speech with a stark call-out: doubling down on fossil fuels, he argued, is an “absurd” strategy. Yet Guterres’s critique applies globally, not least to Canada, where green rhetoric runs headlong into the hard numbers: in 2023 alone, Ottawa shelled out over $18.6 billion in subsidies for fossil fuels, including billions for the Trans Mountain pipeline, financing for exports, and carbon capture ventures. Canada might fancy itself a climate champion, but it remains deeply invested in its petrostate reality.

Meanwhile, COP29’s developing-world attendees are justified in their frustration. They’ve been promised that wealthy countries would mobilize $100 billion annually since 2009 for climate adaptation. That goal, missed for years and only achieved in 2022, barely scratches the surface of what’s needed. It’s telling that even the Taliban—a group not often linked to environmental progress—arrived at COP29, urging wealthy nations to compensate for a crisis they “created.” That irony is rich, as is the uneasy spectacle of the world’s most powerful nations discussing climate finance in the luxurious halls of Baku.

But the circus hardly ends there. Despite promises of “sacrifice for the planet,” leaders in wealthier nations backslide when convenient—case in point, Justin Trudeau’s carve-out for home heating oil subsidies to placate Atlantic Canadian voters. As developing nations and vulnerable communities around the world brace for more severe climate impacts, it’s hard not to question whether the COP model, given its current direction, serves the world’s climate needs or is just window-dressing for yet another round of political expediency.

With the return of a climate-skeptic U.S. administration and high-profile absences from global leaders, COP29 feels more like a fractious forum for unmet promises and entrenched interests than the decisive moment we need. The stakes for climate action have never been higher, but with fossil fuel subsidies unabated and key leaders disengaged, the question lingers: can this COP deliver anything more than lip service to a rapidly worsening crisis?

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Saturday November 2, 2024

Watching the U.S. presidential election, most Canadians hope for a clear victory for Kamala Harris to secure stability and cooperation, fearing that a second Trump presidency would bring further chaos, authoritarianism, and harmful protectionist policies.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday November 2, 2024

On the Eve of America’s Election, Canadians Hold Their Breath

June 13, 2018

As the United States approaches its presidential election, Canadians, from the urban streets of Toronto to the quiet prairies, are watching with bated breath. The contest between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump is more than just another page in American political history; it represents two starkly different futures that will reverberate beyond U.S. borders, affecting allies and neighbours profoundly. For Canada, America’s closest partner since 1867, this election isn’t just American—it’s personal.

The phrase “the most crucial election in history” is often repeated, but this time it has a tangible edge. The 2024 U.S. election embodies a crossroads, where voters will decide between the steady continuation of policies under Kamala Harris, echoing the Biden administration’s cooperative and measured approach, or the return of Donald Trump, whose prior presidency Canadians recall with unease. The stakes for us north of the 49th parallel couldn’t be higher.

News: How the road to the White House might lead through … Canada?

August 10, 2018

Kamala Harris offers a promise of continuity. As vice president, she demonstrated alignment with Joe Biden’s multilateral, diplomacy-first approach. For Canada, this means a continuation of relatively stable trade relations, measured discourse, and policies that, while not free from protectionism, are at least navigable within established norms. Harris’s familiarity with Canada, thanks to her time living in Montreal, offers a touch of reassurance. She understands the shared history and mutual dependence that bind our nations.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, conjures memories of the tumultuous years between 2017 and 2021, where tweets upended diplomatic channels, tariffs strained trade worth billions, and public insults created friction. His administration’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, marked by science denial and erratic policies, unnecessarily prolonged the crisis, deepening misery, death tolls, and border closures that impacted millions on both sides. Trump’s reputation for unpredictability and a bruising, transactional foreign policy leaves little doubt that a second term would likely see him acting with even fewer restraints. His rhetoric has evolved into a more menacing promise of retribution, targeting opponents at home and abroad, unsettling the principles of democracy itself. His protectionist impulses threaten not just U.S.-Canada trade but also the broader framework of international relations.

October 2, 2018

The notion that Trump’s return could usher in authoritarian-style governance is not alarmist; it reflects real concerns. Analysts, former diplomats, and ordinary Canadians alike note that he has adopted policies and attitudes more associated with strongman regimes than democratic leadership. The term “fascism” is whispered with increasing frequency and gravity. A second Trump term could mean a more emboldened, less constrained version of his first, which Canadians remember for its disregard for collaborative norms.

News: Canada prepares for U.S. election that ‘keeps people up at night’

Canada has worked hard to maintain balanced relations, adapting swiftly when Trump first took office in 2016. We dispatched officials across states, stressed our shared economic interests, and met trade threats with measured responses. Now, as we face the potential of a Trump resurgence, we’re deploying “Team Canada” once again, a reminder that we’re not just bystanders but active participants trying to navigate and protect our future.

August 24, 2017

Canadians, known for their polite stoicism, feel anxious in this moment. The prospect of another Trump presidency, with its barrage of unpredictability, forced tariffs, and potential for fracturing alliances, is unsettling. Many Canadians, particularly those with cross-border ties or who rely on stable U.S. policies for business and security, are praying for an outcome that definitively rejects the path of division and discord.

Public commentary reflects this hope and fear. Canadians express empathy for their American friends, echoing a shared sentiment of dread over what might come. “Sorry about keeping you up at night,” reads one comment, capturing the mutual anxiety. Others voice a readiness to welcome Americans looking for refuge if Trump prevails, a nod to the deep-seated bond and concern Canadians feel for the fate of their southern neighbour.

Analysis: How the U.S. election could impact the loonie and your investments

November 23, 2016

On the eve of this election, we hope for a definitive result that repudiates not only Trump’s candidacy but the values he embodies—revenge, authoritarianism, and disregard for multilateralism. A clear and overwhelming victory for Kamala Harris would send a powerful message about the resilience of democratic norms and set the stage for cooperation that extends beyond borders.

For Canada, it’s not just about watching democracy unfold; it’s about witnessing whether the principles that have bound us as allies for over 150 years will be reaffirmed or tested to their limits. We remain hopeful that the ballots cast will ensure a future that holds the potential for partnership, stability, and the quiet peace of mind that comes with knowing that reason has prevailed over chaos. As we wait, the air is thick with apprehension—and the silent wish for stability and continuity in the form of a Harris presidency.

A view from Canada from the USA

I’m writing to you from Columbus, Ohio, where I’ve temporarily set up shop at my mother-in-law’s house. In an earlier post, I mentioned that the atmosphere around here has been consumed by two things: college football and non-stop showings of Halloween on AMC. Life has been unseasonably warm, so much so that the patios are still open, and people are taking full advantage of the balmy fall weather. It’s a peaceful prelude to an election that is anything but.

Despite working within a distinctly Canadian news bubble, each day after finishing up my editorial cartoons, I immerse myself in the rhythms of American life. I’ve sat through Conclave in a massive cinema that dwarfs those back home and have spent evenings at local chicken wing joints where the beer is cold and refreshingly inexpensive. The restaurants are full, construction sites buzz with the sound of new homes being built, and businesses seem to be thriving. Contrary to the doomsayers’ forecasts, the U.S. economy is booming, with GDP per capita growth outpacing that of many other nations.

Ohio is a red state, and it shows. Here, I’ve encountered Trump supporters who, while passionate, admit to tempering their displays of partisanship. It’s a subtle change, indicative of the times. Conversations sometimes turn to policy, and I’m asked why, as a Canadian, I wouldn’t want a leader who would green-light a pipeline to transport Alberta bitumen to American refineries—the very project President Biden halted. There is a palpable disconnect when talk turns to tariffs or the global economic ripples a second Trump term might send through Canada and beyond.

In my observations, Trump’s loyal base often revolves around a mix of deeply rooted religious and social beliefs: an anti-abortion agenda, a shared grievance against what they perceive as a rigged justice system, conspiratorial whispers about Democratic corruption, resentment over immigration, and the fantastical hope that Trump might one day eliminate income taxes. I suspect similar barbed rhetoric is directed at Republicans in blue states. The polarization is as stark as it is palpable.

Yet, Canadians watch this American election with a different lens. The contrast between Kamala Harris’s promise of continuity and a Trump return, marked by potential revenge-fuelled governance, trade instability, and unpredictable outbursts, isn’t lost on us. We remember the drawn-out effects of a chaotic COVID-19 response, which prolonged suffering, kept the border closed, and strained both lives and economies. A Harris presidency, with her understanding of Canada and commitment to diplomacy, would mean a more stable future—one with fewer trade wars and more predictability.

With only days to go, tension bubbles beneath the surface. We brace for what feels like the inevitable: Trump’s preemptive claims of election fraud, disputes over mail-in ballots, and early signs of dissent. It’s likely this election, close as it promises to be, will come with its share of accusations and unrest. Canadians hope, above all, for an outcome that brings peace and stability, steering the future away from the turbulence of Trump’s past tenure. But here in Ohio, amid the warm autumn nights and easy conversation, that anxiety feels temporarily at bay—until the real drama begins next week.

– Graeme MacKay

Read on Substack

Friday August 2, 2024

Despite ongoing revelations about foreign interference in Canada's elections, political leaders and the media remain largely passive and inactive, leading to a perception of complicity and neglect.

By Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday August 2, 2024

A Midsummer Night’s Snooze: A Tale of Political Slumber on Foreign Interference

Act I: The Enchanted Woods of Ottawa

In the enchanted woods of Ottawa, where political dreams and realities intertwine, our tale unfolds. The Canadian political leaders, akin to Shakespearean characters, find themselves in a midsummer night’s reverie, oblivious to the machinations of foreign entities.

August 1, 2023

Scene I: The Court of King Trudeau

King Justin Trudeau, the noble but distracted ruler, holds court with his advisors. His recent efforts to establish the Security and Intelligence Threats to Elections (SITE) Task Force are met with mild applause, but his mind is elsewhere, captivated by visions of climate summits and grand speeches.

Trudeau: “We have established SITE, my lords, to guard our elections from foreign sprites. But let us not fret too much; the fair summer calls us to lighter endeavors!”

Scene II: The Mischief of Puck Poilievre

Enter Puck Poilievre, the mischievous Conservative sprite, who delights in stirring trouble and pointing fingers, but prefers the comforts of ideological battles over addressing the ethereal threats of foreign interference.

Poilievre: “King Trudeau, why fret over these unseen shadows? ‘Tis better to joust with taxes and pipelines, leaving these foreign phantoms to their devices!”

Raising concern about Trudeau's governance due to issues like ArriveCAN mismanagement, CERB problems, and potential pitfalls of rushed decisions for political support, such as quick deals on Pharmacare and Dental care.

February 29, 2024

Scene III: The Dream of Duke Singh

Duke Jagmeet Singh, leader of the New Democratic fairies, drifts into a dreamy state. While his heart is noble and his intentions pure, he too finds solace in the magical woods of social policies and justice, rather than the murky depths of election integrity.

Singh: “Let us dream of fairer wages and homes for all, for the meddling of foreign lands seems but a distant whisper in these enchanted woods.”

NYT: A Critical Gap in Democracy? ‘Yawn,’ Say Canadian Politicians

Scene IV: The Counsel of Titania May

Queen Elizabeth May, the wise and green Titania of this tale, alone speaks of the perils of ignoring the foreign sprites that dance around their democratic bower. Yet, her warnings are but the whispers of the wind in the ears of the slumbering leaders.

May: “Beware the whispers of foreign realms, for they seek to twine their tendrils into our sacred boughs. Our democracy is no playground for these tricksters.”

Pierre Poilievre’s refusal to access a classified national security report on foreign interference demonstrates a concerning lack of leadership and responsibility.

June 13, 2024

Act II: The Spell of Complacency

In a moonlit glade, the political leaders gather, lulled by the soothing summer breeze and the harmonious chirping of crickets. Oberon, the spirit of Complacency, casts his spell, and one by one, they fall into a deep slumber, their dreams filled with visions of grandeur and domestic triumphs.

Oberon: “Sleep, dear leaders, in this midsummer’s embrace. Let foreign meddling fade into the mist, for what harm can whispers do to those who dream so soundly?”

The lack of transparency and accountability in addressing allegations of foreign interference in Canadian politics, particularly regarding MPs who may have been witting or clueless collaborators, risks eroding public trust, with concerns raised about potential partisanship influencing responses, particularly within the Liberal Party.

June 12, 2024

Act III: The Awakening

As the first light of dawn pierces the canopy, the spell begins to lift. The leaders stir, groggy but blissfully unaware of the night’s machinations. Yet, the woods whisper truths they choose not to hear, for the comfort of dreams is a powerful balm.

Trudeau: “Awake, my friends! Let us return to our courtly duties, assured that all is well in our realm.”

Poilievre: “Indeed, let us joust anew, for the day is bright and full of promise.”

Singh: “Let us champion the cause of the common folk, for in their dreams lies our strength.”

May: “Beware, though, the lingering whispers of the night, for they may return when least expected.”

Epilogue: The Bard’s Reflection

And so, the tale of political slumber continues, with leaders more enchanted by the dreams of summer than the pressing whispers of foreign interference. The enchanted woods of Ottawa remain a place where reality and dreams blur, and the threats of foreign lands are but distant murmurs in the midsummer night’s snooze.

Thus, the fair democracy of Canada lies, a midsummer dream, beneath the watchful yet weary eyes of its leaders, ever hopeful that their slumber will not be their undoing. (AI)