2023-07

Tuesday April 25, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 25, 2023

From Sport Hero to Betting Shill

October 11, 2012

Promoting online sports betting using athletes is irresponsible and harmful. Many popular athletes, such as Connor McDavid, Auston Matthews, or Wayne Gretzky, are seen endorsing sports books during NHL playoffs. These companies shamelessly leverage the popularity of athletes and celebrities to promote addictive gambling products. Recently, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) proposed banning athletes from participating in gambling marketing to address the negative impact on young people.

It is concerning that athletes with strong appeal to young audiences, such as McDavid and Matthews, are promoting sports betting. Gambling is recognized as addictive, yet it is advertised more prominently than other addictive products like tobacco or cannabis. 

The AGCO’s proposed amendments, which aim to ban the use of celebrities, influencers, and symbols that appeal to minors, are a positive step towards addressing this issue. However, there are still concerns about other forms of advertising, such as jersey patches and broadcast ads, that continue to associate athletes with sports betting.

News: How broader sports gambling has fared in Ontario and how it may change next  

July 29, 2020

In response to the growing concerns, a coalition of professional sports leagues has announced plans to develop consumer-protection policies, signalling a broader pushback against sports betting advertising. While the proposed regulations may bring changes to the types of advertisements, it is unlikely to significantly reduce their volume. It is crucial to prioritize consumer protection, especially for vulnerable populations like youth and young adults, and regulate gambling advertising with the same level of scrutiny as other addictive products.

The use of athletes to promote online sports betting is irresponsible and potentially harmful. Athletes should be aware of the negative impact of their endorsement on young audiences. The proposed amendments by the AGCO are a step in the right direction, but more action is needed to prevent athletes from promoting addictive behaviours. It is time to prioritize consumer well-being, particularly for vulnerable populations, and implement stricter regulations on gambling advertising. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give editorial cartooning a try.

 

Saturday April 22, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 22, 2023

Like it or not, Work is Work, Wherever the Worker is

April 21, 2020

As the labour dispute between federal government employees and their employer, the Canadian government, continues, one contentious issue that has come to the forefront is the demand for the right to work from home. While some argue in favor of remote work, citing its productivity and convenience, it’s important to acknowledge that both working in the office and working from home have their downsides.

Working in the office has its negatives. The daily commute to the office can be time-consuming, stressful, and costly, particularly for those who live far from their workplace. It can also contribute to environmental impacts due to transportation emissions, adding to concerns about sustainability. Office environments can be noisy and distracting, making it challenging for some employees to concentrate and be productive. Additionally, adhering to a fixed schedule may limit flexibility for employees who prefer a more flexible work arrangement. Working in the office may also incur additional expenses, such as commuting costs, work attire, and meals, which can impact an employee’s budget. Moreover, health and safety concerns, such as exposure to illnesses from colleagues or ergonomic issues, may arise in the office setting.

News: More than half of Canadians support federal employees’ right to work from home: survey  

March 28, 2020

On the other hand, working from home also has its drawbacks. Social isolation can be a real concern for remote workers, as they may miss out on social interactions and opportunities for collaboration with colleagues, which can impact morale and well-being. Blurred work-life boundaries can also be a challenge, as remote work can make it difficult to disconnect from work and maintain a healthy work-life balance. Dependence on technology can pose challenges such as technical issues, connectivity problems, and reliance on digital communication tools, which may impact productivity. Distractions at home, such as household chores, family responsibilities, or noise from family members or neighbors, can also hinder productivity. Furthermore, reduced visibility with managers and colleagues may limit career growth opportunities, promotions, and professional relationships for remote workers.

Opinion: How working from home gave Canadians a big pay raise – and why nobody wants to give it up  

February 8, 2001

In the midst of the labour dispute, it’s important to recognize that there is no perfect solution. Work is work, whether it’s done in the office or from home. Both options have their pros and cons, and it’s crucial to find a balance that works for both employers and employees. It’s clear that the demand for the right to work from home is driven by a desire for flexibility and modern work arrangements. However, it’s also important to acknowledge that working in the office has its merits, including opportunities for social interactions, visibility, and collaboration with colleagues.

As we navigate the changing landscape of work, it’s crucial for employers and employees to have open and constructive dialogues to find mutually beneficial solutions. This may involve exploring hybrid work models that allow for a mix of office and remote work, taking into consideration the nature of the job, the needs of the employees, and the goals of the organization. Ultimately, the key is to prioritize effective communication, flexibility, and mutual respect in order to create a work environment that is productive, inclusive, and supportive for all parties involved. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give editorial cartooning a try.

 

Friday April 21, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 21, 2023

Trudeau’s Military Shortcomings and Jet-Setting Splurges

July 11, 2020

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been known for his luxurious lifestyle and expensive vacations, often jet setting with his family to extravagant destinations. Recently, it has been revealed that the Trudeaus spent their holiday season at a lavish estate in Jamaica owned by a wealthy family that made a large donation to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation just two years ago. While the trip was cleared by the ethics commissioner before departure, questions arise about the optics of such a trip at a time when many Canadians are struggling financially due to the high cost of goods and services, and Trudeau’s government has been accused of contributing to inflation and neglecting the cost of living crisis.

News: Trudeau family vacationed with wealthy friends who donated to Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation  

March 14, 2019

But Trudeau’s expensive trips are not a new phenomenon. In the past, he has faced criticism for his trips to the Aga Khan’s island in 2016, which earned him a reprimand from the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, and for renting a luxury suite at great expense during Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral in London in 2021. These trips have cost Canadian taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, raising questions about Trudeau’s priorities and spending habits.

What is particularly troubling is that Trudeau’s lavish lifestyle and expensive vacations come at a time when he has been criticized for being a cheapskate on military obligations and a global security laggard. The Trudeau government has been repeatedly called out for underfunding the military and neglecting Canada’s defense obligations, both domestically and internationally. As the world faces increasing security challenges, including threats from adversaries such as China and Russia, Canada’s military readiness and capabilities have been called into question.

January 11, 2023

Moreover, Trudeau’s disregard for military obligations is not just a matter of underfunding, but also a lack of commitment to international alliances and partnerships. Canada has traditionally been a strong ally in international security efforts, including NATO and peacekeeping missions. However, under Trudeau’s leadership, Canada has fallen behind in meeting its military commitments to these alliances. This has raised concerns among Canada’s allies and partners, who rely on Canada’s contributions to global security efforts.

News: Trudeau privately told NATO Canada would never meet 2-per-cent defence spending target: report

Trudeau’s penchant for luxury vacations and expensive trips while neglecting military obligations and global security commitments sends a troubling message to Canadians and the international community. It suggests a lack of priorities and a disregard for the real threats and challenges that Canada faces in today’s world. While Trudeau enjoys the perks of his lavish lifestyle, Canadian taxpayers foot the bill for his extravagant trips, including the recent trip to Jamaica that cost at least $162,000 in taxpayer expenses for security and other costs.

November 17, 2015

It’s time for Trudeau to reassess his priorities and demonstrate a genuine commitment to fulfilling Canada’s military obligations and global security commitments. As the world becomes more complex and uncertain, Canada cannot afford to have a leader who neglects these critical responsibilities while living a life of luxury. Canadians deserve a leader who prioritizes their security and well-being over personal indulgences. It’s time for Trudeau to step up and show true leadership in addressing Canada’s military and security challenges, rather than being known as a cheapskate on military obligations and a global security laggard while enjoying expensive vacations.(AI)

 

Thursday April 20, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 20, 2023

Slap Shot or Slap in the Face?

October 7, 2022

The recent decision by the Trudeau government to release Hockey Canada from the penalty box and restore its funding after it was frozen in June 2022 by Sport Minister Pascale St-Onge has raised eyebrows and doubts about its wisdom. While Hockey Canada did enough to provisionally regain its funding, the challenges it now faces in rebuilding trust with major sponsors may be insurmountable, according to marketing expert Dr. Joanne McNeish from Toronto Metropolitan University.

The loss of sponsorship dollars, which was reported to be $23.5 million last year, and the loss of funding was a direct result of the revelation that a woman alleged she was sexually assaulted by eight players, including members of the 2018 world junior team, following a foundation gala in London, Ont. in June 2018. Hockey Canada and the woman quietly settled a $3.55 million lawsuit out of court. Subsequently, members of the 2003 men’s world junior roster were also being investigated for a group sexual assault.

Despite bringing in new leadership and meeting the conditions to have its funding restored, Hockey Canada’s reputation has been severely tarnished. The decision to restore funding has been met with disagreement by some members of Parliament, and it has raised questions about the organization’s leverage in negotiations with potential or past sponsors.

Opinion: The funding is back but can public trust in Hockey Canada be restored? 

November 28, 2007

Dr. McNeish argues that rebuilding trust, once broken, is a monumental challenge. Sponsors will be cautious and may impose additional legal and contractual obligations, which could be costly for a non-profit organization like Hockey Canada. This means that the organization will have less freedom in how it uses the funding provided and may have to accept less favorable terms from sponsors, leaving them in a position of almost begging for sponsorship.

Furthermore, the public perception of Hockey Canada may be negatively impacted, with sponsors opting for more targeted and specific funding at the grassroots level, rather than a visible public link with the organization. Companies like Tim Hortons have already pulled out of men’s hockey programming for the 2022-2023 season, including the men’s world junior championships, while continuing to fund women’s and para hockey teams, as well as youth hockey.

Dr. McNeish argues that while some sponsors may return, others may not find it worth the risk to associate themselves with an organization that has faced serious allegations of sexual assault and has had its funding frozen. The damage to Hockey Canada’s reputation may result in a weaker negotiating position and less favorable sponsorship terms, which could have long-term repercussions for the organization’s financial stability and ability to support grassroots hockey.

News: Rebuilding trust with sponsors will be next challenge for Hockey Canada  

February 22, 2014

In conclusion, the Trudeau government’s decision to restore funding to Hockey Canada may not have been a wise one. While the organization has met the conditions to regain its funding, the challenges of rebuilding trust with major sponsors and the potential loss of leverage in negotiations may have long-term negative consequences. The damage to Hockey Canada’s reputation may result in less favorable sponsorship terms and a weakened financial position, which could impact its ability to support grassroots hockey in Canada. It remains to be seen how sponsors will respond, but the decision to restore funding may have been made too hastily, without fully considering the potential consequences for the organization’s future. (AI)

 

Wednesday April 19, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 19, 2023

Stephen Lecce’s Education Agenda Fails Ontario’s Students

November 2, 2022

As Ontario’s education minister, Stephen Lecce has been pushing for a “back to basics” approach in the province’s schools, emphasizing reading, writing, and math. However, his recent introduction of legislation that gives him greater control over school boards and sets student achievement priorities has been met with criticism and skepticism from educators, parents, and unions alike.

One of the main concerns is that Lecce’s approach fails to address the real issues plaguing Ontario’s schools. The overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools, and crumbling infrastructure are serious problems that require immediate attention. Instead of addressing these pressing concerns, Lecce seems more focused on standardized test scores as a measure of success, which critics argue is narrow and limited in its scope.

News: Doug Ford government sets sights on Ontario’s school system  

July 29, 2022

Lecce’s emphasis on standardized test scores as the sole measure of student achievement is shortsighted and fails to recognize the holistic nature of education. Education is not just about reading, writing, and math; it’s about fostering critical thinking skills, creativity, problem-solving, and social-emotional development. By narrowing the focus solely on test scores, Lecce is neglecting the broader needs of students and ignoring the importance of a well-rounded education.

Moreover, Lecce’s approach of “government overreach” and greater control over school boards is worrisome. Critics argue that local school boards and educators are better positioned to understand the unique needs of their students and communities, and imposing top-down mandates from the government may not be the most effective solution. The move to standardize training for trustees and board officials, as well as performance appraisals for directors of education, may not necessarily lead to improved outcomes for students, and it may further erode local autonomy in education decision-making.

August 6, 2020

Furthermore, the funding increase of 2.7 per cent announced by Lecce for the next academic year falls short of meeting the needs of Ontario’s schools. With overcrowded classrooms and understaffed schools, students are not receiving the attention and support they need to succeed. The recent hiring of 1,000 teachers for specialized math and literacy programs is a positive step, but it may not be enough to address the larger systemic issues facing Ontario’s education system.

Another concern is the proposed use of surplus school board properties for housing. While affordable housing is an important issue, repurposing school properties may not be the most effective solution. Schools are essential community spaces that provide a safe and inclusive environment for learning, and repurposing them for other purposes may have long-term consequences for students and communities.

March 19, 2019

It’s also worth noting that Lecce’s approach fails to acknowledge the existing efforts and achievements of Ontario’s schools. The province’s education system has been recognized as one of the top-performing systems nationally and internationally, as stated by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario. While there is always room for improvement, Lecce’s overhaul of the education system seems unnecessary and lacking in a clear vision for the future.

In conclusion, Stephen Lecce’s approach to education in Ontario falls short of addressing the real issues facing schools. The emphasis on standardized test scores, government overreach, and lack of adequate funding and support for schools and students are significant concerns. Instead of focusing on narrow measures of success, Lecce should prioritize addressing the overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools, and crumbling infrastructure that hinder student learning. Ontario’s education system needs a comprehensive and holistic approach that takes into account the diverse needs of students and communities, and empowers local educators and school boards to make informed decisions. It’s time for Lecce to listen to the concerns of educators, parents, and students, and work towards meaningful solutions that truly benefit Ontario’s schools. (AI)