2024-08

Saturday May 4, 2024

The concerns regarding Pierre Poilievre's casual use of the Notwithstanding clause include the potential undermining of the balance of power, diminishing the importance of Charter rights, the risk of misuse and abuse, and setting a dangerous precedent for future governments.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday May 4, 2024

The Notwithstanding Clause Should Not Be a Regular Strategy of Governing

Both Bonnie Crombie and Pierre Poilievre's opposition to the carbon tax raises questions about their alternative plans for addressing climate change, leaving voters to wonder: if not a carbon tax, then what specific measures do they propose to tackle this urgent issue, if any at all?

March 22, 2024

The federal Conservatives’ proposal to utilize the notwithstanding clause to override Charter-protected rights and freedoms has sparked a heated debate. While Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre initially focused on criminal justice matters, the Official Opposition did not rule out its application to other policy areas. This article serves as a warning to Poilievre, urging him to reconsider using the notwithstanding clause as a regular strategy of governing. The potential consequences of such an approach, along with the context of recent discussions, must be carefully considered.

Opinion: Poilievre flirts with far right while media looks away

Earlier this week, Poilievre avoided clarifying how often he intended to use the notwithstanding clause when questioned by the media. His spokesperson later stated that their attention was focused on ensuring the imprisonment of the most dangerous criminals, such as mass murderers and child predators, to protect the safety of Canadians. However, the use of the notwithstanding clause has been increasingly invoked by provincial governments to restrict labor rights, freedom of expression, and religion. This raises concerns about the purpose and legitimacy of the clause, as well as its potential misuse.

December 1, 2022

Poilievre specifically mentioned his intention to override a Supreme Court ruling that struck down a law allowing for life sentences with no chance of parole. He referred to the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, who committed a heinous act by killing six Muslim worshippers in a Quebec City mosque in 2017. The Supreme Court ruled that sentencing mass killers, including terrorists, to whole-life sentences constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Poilievre criticized this ruling, arguing that Bissonnette should remain behind bars for life. However, legal experts have pointed out that Poilievre’s comments misrepresent Bissonnette’s sentence, as the 25-year mark only represents the earliest eligibility for parole. They emphasize that the Charter was designed to protect the rights of unpopular minorities and prevent the government from engaging in cruel and unusual punishment.

News: Love the idea or hate it, experts say federal use of notwithstanding clause would be a bombshell 

September 11, 2018

Using the notwithstanding clause as a regular strategy of governing poses significant risks. It undermines the balance of power and judicial independence, as well as diminishes the importance of Charter-protected rights and freedoms. Regular reliance on the clause erodes public confidence and trust in the government’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights. Furthermore, it sets a dangerous precedent by allowing the government to override rights without sufficient justification. The notwithstanding clause was intended to be a limited and exceptional measure, and using it as a routine tool undermines the integrity of our democratic system.

The artist at work drawing this cartoon from a remote location: student housing in Ottawa

Pierre Poilievre must heed this warning and carefully consider the potential consequences of using the notwithstanding clause as a regular strategy of governing. The context surrounding recent discussions, including the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, highlights the importance of protecting individual rights and maintaining the balance of power within our democratic system. Rather than diluting the purpose of the notwithstanding clause, Poilievre should seek alternative approaches that uphold the principles of justice, equality, and respect for Charter-protected rights. Our democracy’s strength lies in the preservation of checks and balances and the protection of individual rights for all Canadians. (AI)

 

Wednesday May 1, 2024

The ban on cell phones in Ontario classrooms shines a light on the widespread problem of smartphone addiction, impacting not just education but also workplaces, social interactions, and personal well-being, necessitating a multi-faceted approach for effective mitigation.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 1, 2024

Beyond the Classroom: Addressing the Broader Problem of Smartphone Addiction

September 3, 2013

The recent decision by the Ontario government to ban cell phones in classrooms has reignited the debate over the role of smartphones in education. While this move has sparked discussions about distractions and academic performance, it also brings to light a broader issue: smartphone addiction among adults.

Smartphones have become ubiquitous in our society, seamlessly integrated into every aspect of our daily lives. From morning alarms to late-night scrolling sessions, these devices are constant companions, offering a gateway to endless information and entertainment. However, the convenience and connectivity they provide come at a cost.

The addictive nature of smartphones is undeniable. Research has shown that excessive smartphone use can lead to a range of negative outcomes, including decreased productivity, impaired social interactions, and heightened levels of stress and anxiety. Despite these consequences, many adults find themselves unable to break free from the grip of their devices.

Editorial: “Out of sight, out of mind.” There are many good reasons to curb cellphones in class

September 17, 2010

The Ontario government’s decision to ban cell phones in classrooms is a step in the right direction, but it only scratches the surface of a much larger problem. Smartphone addiction extends far beyond the confines of the classroom, affecting individuals in all aspects of their lives – from the workplace to social settings and even in the privacy of their own homes.

In the workplace, smartphones blur the boundaries between professional and personal life, leading to a constant state of connectivity and an expectation of immediate responsiveness. This can result in burnout and decreased job satisfaction, as individuals struggle to maintain a healthy work-life balance.

November 2, 2017

In social settings, smartphones have replaced face-to-face interactions, leading to a decline in meaningful connections and a rise in feelings of loneliness and isolation. Instead of engaging with those around us, we often find ourselves glued to our screens, missing out on the richness of human connection.

Even in our downtime, smartphones continue to hold sway over our lives. The temptation to check email, scroll through social media, or binge-watch videos can be irresistible, leaving us feeling drained and unfulfilled.

Addressing smartphone addiction requires a multi-faceted approach that goes beyond classroom bans. It requires a cultural shift in how we view and interact with technology, as well as policies and interventions aimed at promoting digital well-being.

May 20, 2017

Tech companies must take responsibility for their role in perpetuating addictive behaviours, by designing products and services that prioritize user well-being over engagement metrics. Governments can play a role by implementing regulations that curb the most harmful aspects of smartphone use, such as excessive screen time and targeted advertising.

But ultimately, the onus is on us as individuals to take control of our technology use and establish healthier habits. This means setting boundaries, practicing mindfulness, and seeking support when needed.

The Ontario government’s ban on cell phones in classrooms is a wake-up call, highlighting the need for a broader conversation about smartphone addiction in our society. It’s time to recognize the true extent of the problem and take meaningful steps to address it, both in the classroom and beyond. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try:

 

Tuesday April 30, 2024

The proposed changes to capital gains taxation and a change in election timing which stands to endow more that 80 MPs Parliamentary pensions, reveals a troubling pattern of government prioritizing political interests over the financial struggles of middle-income taxpayers, highlighting a pervasive culture of double speak and self-serving governance.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 30, 2024

Inequity Unveiled: The Double Speak of Capital Gains Tax and Political Pensions

Canada's complicated tax system is leaving the middle class burdened, with promises of simplification unmet, calling for urgent reform.

February 27, 2024

As middle-income taxpayers navigate the labyrinth of economic challenges, recent debates surrounding capital gains tax and political pensions have unveiled a disconcerting pattern of double speak within the corridors of power. A proposed change in electoral laws would have the next fixed election date moved one week later to Oct. 27, because the original date coincides with Diwali, and this fine tuning would guarantee pensions for more than 80 MPs whether they win or lose as they pass the 6 year threshold. While the government champions tax reforms as a matter of fairness, their underlying motivations, intertwined with rewarding loyal MPs, reveal a troubling disregard for the struggles of everyday Canadians.

News: Liberals’ elections law reforms could yield generous pensions for dozens of MPs

September 16, 2021

At the heart of the matter lies the proposed changes to capital gains taxation, ostensibly framed as a means to level the playing field and ensure equitable contributions to societal welfare. However, this narrative crumbles under scrutiny when one considers the government’s staunch defence, which seems more motivated by appeasing its political allies than by genuine concern for fiscal equity. By raising the inclusion rate on capital gains, the government not only targets wealthier earners but also conveniently provides a platform for rewarding MPs who prop up their policies.

This isn’t just about balancing the books; it’s about wielding power to benefit the few at the expense of the many. Middle-income taxpayers, already grappling with the harsh realities of inflation, stagnant wages, and mounting expenses, see through the facade of fairness. They recognize the thinly veiled attempts to placate political allies under the guise of progressive taxation, all while their own burdens continue to mount.

March 27, 2023

Moreover, the proposed changes to the set timing of the coming federal election add insult to injury. As MPs maneuver to secure their financial futures with taxpayer-funded pensions, the hypocrisy of preaching fiscal responsibility while indulging in self-serving perks is glaring. While the middle-income earners tighten their belts and make sacrifices, the political elite revel in the comfort of taxpayer largesse, further eroding public trust in the integrity of our democratic institutions.

Analysis: Doctors say capital gains tax changes will jeopardize their retirement

December 13, 2013

It’s time to call out this charade for what it is: a betrayal of the public trust and a gross misallocation of resources. Middle-income taxpayers deserve better than to be pawns in a political game of self-interest. They deserve leaders who prioritize the common good over personal gain, who champion transparency and accountability, and who are committed to lifting the burdens that weigh heavily on the shoulders of hardworking families.

As we navigate these uncertain times, let us not forget the fundamental principle that government exists to serve the people, not the other way around. It’s time to demand integrity, fairness, and genuine representation from those who wield power in our name. Anything less would be a disservice to the very fabric of our democracy. (AI)

Editorial Cartoon reposted to Scripturient: Why Are Canada’s Conservatives Opposed to Everything Good?, and Reddit: Pals of Poilievre.

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try:

Friday April 26, 2024

The chummy relationship between Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and extremists at an anti-carbon tax protest raises serious concerns about his judgment and the implications of normalizing extremist affiliations in Canadian politics.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 26, 2024

Pierre Poilievre’s Chummy Relationship with Extremists Raises Concerns

September 9, 2023

In the world of politics, the company you keep can speak volumes about your values and priorities. Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre recently found himself under scrutiny after videos surfaced of him cozying up to protesters at an anti-carbon tax camp near the New Brunswick-Nova Scotia border. What’s most troubling is not just his presence at the protest but the enthusiastic encouragement he provided to individuals brandishing extremist symbols and messages.

During his visit, Poilievre was captured on video expressing support for the protesters, referring to their actions as a “good, old-fashioned Canadian tax revolt.” This, in itself, is not unusual for a political leader seeking to connect with disgruntled constituents. However, the context surrounding this protest raises serious questions.

News: ‘He will do anything to win’: Justin Trudeau slams Pierre Poilievre for not denouncing endorsement by infamous American conspiracy theorist

August 26, 2022

The group behind this protest, as highlighted by RCMP documents, is associated with an ideology described as “accelerationist,” believing in the inevitability of civil unrest or the collapse of governments. This is a far cry from the concerns of everyday Canadians struggling with the cost of living or the impacts of government policies.

Even more concerning is the presence of symbols associated with the Diagolon network, which RCMP views as a militia-like organization. Poilievre’s team attempted to distance themselves, claiming ignorance of these symbols, but the optics of a political leader aligning himself with individuals displaying such affiliations are deeply troubling.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rightly pointed out the risks of Poilievre’s actions, accusing him of welcoming “the support of conspiracy theorists and extremists.” This is not just a political jab; it’s a valid concern about the kind of leadership Poilievre represents and the implications of normalizing extremist associations in Canadian politics.

Poilievre’s response, dismissing these criticisms and asserting that he simply opposes the carbon tax, is inadequate. Aspiring leaders have a responsibility not only to oppose policies but also to denounce extremism in all its forms. By failing to do so, Poilievre sends a dangerous message that pandering to extremist sentiments is acceptable in the pursuit of political gain.

Opinion: Pierre Poilievre is courting support from groups that spew hate. Is this really the alternative to Justin Trudeau we want?

February 8, 2022

The Conservative Party, under Poilievre’s leadership, should reflect deeply on the kind of political culture they want to foster. In a diverse and inclusive society like Canada, there is no room for flirtations with extremism or pandering to fringe groups. Political leaders must uphold principles of unity and tolerance, demonstrating through their actions that they represent all Canadians, not just a select few.

The risk of normalizing extremist rhetoric and affiliations is not just a matter of political strategy; it’s a threat to the fabric of our democracy. Poilievre’s eagerness to embrace these protesters without acknowledging the broader context of their affiliations raises serious doubts about his judgment and priorities.

As Canadians, we must demand better from our political leaders. It’s not enough to oppose policies; we must also reject the dangerous narratives that seek to divide us and undermine the values that define our nation. Pierre Poilievre’s actions should serve as a wake-up call for all Canadians who cherish unity, tolerance, and the fundamental principles of democracy. (AI)

 

Thursday April 25, 2024

Amid ambitious global pledges to combat plastic pollution, skepticism persists over the disparity between rhetoric and tangible action, highlighting the urgent need for transformative solutions beyond traditional recycling methods.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 25, 2024

Moving Beyond Rhetoric – Time for Real Solutions to Plastic Pollution

January 18, 2022

In the wake of recent international conferences and negotiations aimed at addressing plastic pollution, one can’t help but feel a sense of skepticism lingering in the air. The promises of global treaties and domestic initiatives to combat plastic waste often sound promising on paper, yet the reality on the ground tells a different story.

Consider the latest discussions in Ottawa, where delegates from 175 countries convened to develop a legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. Ambitious goals were set to mobilize the entire world and create a future free of plastic pollution by 2040. While these aspirations are admirable, they must be met with tangible actions and transformative strategies to truly make a difference.

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault rightly pointed out the shortcomings of our current recycling practices, acknowledging that they simply “won’t cut it” in the fight against plastic pollution. He emphasized the need for a shift towards a circular economy, focusing on reuse rather than mere recycling. This sentiment resonates with many who have grown weary of the recycling mantra that seems to have yielded little progress over the years.

News: Poverty. Sovereignty. The war in Ukraine. As countries try to agree on fixing plastic, here’s what’s in their way

As Canada's Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault attends COP28 alongside Prairie premiers Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, the delicate dance of diplomacy unfolds, highlighting the clash between genuine environmental concerns and the unabashed promotion of fossil fuels by the provincial leaders.

November 30, 2023

Furthermore, the allocation of funds to support Canadian businesses in developing technologies to address plastic waste is a step in the right direction. However, these investments must be part of a larger, concerted effort to revolutionize how we produce, consume, and dispose of plastics.

Dimple Roy, from the International Institute for Sustainable Development, highlighted the urgency of addressing microplastic pollution in freshwater systems. This underscores the interconnectedness of our ecosystems and the need for comprehensive solutions that encompass all aspects of the plastic lifecycle.

April 24, 2018

Yet, amidst these discussions and initiatives, the public remains skeptical. We meticulously sort our recyclables, only to discover that much of it ends up in landfills or incinerators. We witness the proliferation of biodegradable alternatives that fail to gain widespread acceptance due to their own set of environmental trade-offs.

It’s time to move beyond the rhetoric of “reduce, reuse, recycle” and embrace a paradigm shift in our approach to plastic pollution. We need bold policies that incentivize sustainable practices, innovative technologies that offer viable alternatives to plastics, and a cultural shift towards conscious consumption.

News: Ottawa looking for Canadian-made solutions for plastic pollution

March 6, 2015

Let us not be swayed by empty promises or symbolic gestures. The time for action is now. We must hold our leaders and policymakers accountable for delivering on their commitments to protect our planet from the scourge of plastic pollution.

As negotiations continue and initiatives are rolled out, let’s demand more than just words on paper. Let’s demand real, meaningful change that leaves a lasting impact on our environment and future generations.

In the battle against plastic pollution, we cannot afford to settle for anything less.

The packaging industry is worth more than a trillion dollars per year globally, and with e-commerce extending the supply chain from the extraction of raw materials to the hands of the consumer, it has never been more important to the functioning of the global economy.

But in sustainability terms, packaging is a problem. Continued: Packaging a problem, January 23, 2023