animation – mackaycartoons

Saturday June 29, 2024

June 29, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 29, 2024

*An animated Making-of clip can be found here.

America Needs a New Challenger Against Trump

Live Drawing: the highs an Lows of Debate 2024

The United States finds itself at a critical juncture once again, grappling with a presidential election that echoes the disillusionment of past choices. As observed in Thomas L. Friedman’s poignant reflection on the recent debate, Joe Biden, a respected figure, has faltered under the weight of his age, evident in a debate performance that left many disheartened. Friedman’s words resonate deeply: “I watched the Biden-Trump debate alone in a Lisbon hotel room, and it made me weep. I cannot remember a more heartbreaking moment in American presidential campaign politics in my lifetime.”

Friedman: Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race

May 30, 2024

In 2024, Donald Trump, despite his divisive tenure and legal troubles, remains a formidable contender. The grim reality of facing a convicted felon with autocratic tendencies in another election cycle underscores the urgency for Democrats to act decisively. The sentiment expressed by critics is clear: Biden’s stumbling performance against Trump’s barrage of lies was not just a setback but a stark reminder of the need for new leadership.

The sentiment among Democrats, encapsulated in Friedman’s column, reflects a growing urgency: “The Biden family and political team must gather quickly and have the hardest of conversations with the president, a conversation of love and clarity and resolve.” This call to action is not merely about electoral strategy but about safeguarding democracy itself from the spectre of Trumpism.

August 7, 2020

The lack of robust fact-checking during the debate, as highlighted in a subsequent article, left many falsehoods unchallenged, perpetuating a narrative that could sway undecided voters. As noted, moderators took a hands-off approach, allowing Trump’s misleading claims to linger without sufficient rebuttal. This underscores the need for a candidate who can not only confront Trump’s rhetoric but also offer a compelling alternative vision for America’s future.

At this pivotal juncture, the Democratic Party must heed the lessons of history and embrace a new challenger who embodies vitality, clarity, and a bold vision for the nation. The stakes are high: a choice between “a con man who thrives on chaos and division,” as articulated in the analysis, and a candidate who can restore faith in democratic governance and lead America forward.

Analysis: ‘You’re the sucker, you’re the loser’: 90 miserable minutes of Biden v Trump

March 7, 2024

The upcoming Democratic National Convention in Chicago presents a crucial opportunity to showcase a robust public process that engages voters and energizes the party’s base. This openness, as advocated in the articles, is essential in identifying a candidate who can unite disparate factions and appeal broadly across the political spectrum.

While the road ahead may be fraught with challenges, one thing remains clear: America cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the past. The Democratic Party must summon the courage to pivot away from Biden’s candidacy if necessary, guided by the imperative to offer voters a compelling alternative to the tumultuous chapter of Trump’s presidency. This decision, as emphasized in the articles, must prioritize the nation’s future over political expediency and demonstrate unwavering commitment to the principles that define America’s democratic ethos.

The choice in 2024 is not just about defeating Trump; it is about reclaiming America’s moral authority and reaffirming its commitment to a future that is inclusive, just, and resilient. This moment demands bold leadership and decisive action from Democrats. The time to act is now. (AI)

Friday June 28, 2024

June 28, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 28, 2024

*The animated making-of clip is here!

The Unraveling of Political Coalitions: Lessons from St. Paul’s Byelection

February 29, 2024

The recent byelection results in St. Paul’s have thrust the federal Liberals and NDP into a harsh reality: their confidence-and-supply agreement, once a strategic maneuver to maintain power, is now unraveling with significant repercussions. Provincial leaders like Ontario’s Bonnie Crombie and Alberta’s Naheed Nenshi are increasingly distancing themselves from their federal counterparts, signalling a pivotal shift in the political landscape and underscoring the inherent perils of such coalitions.

Opinion: The St. Paul’s by-election was bad for the Liberals, but even worse for the NDP

September 23, 2021

Initially born out of necessity, the Liberal-NDP confidence-and-supply agreement allowed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to govern with NDP support in exchange for advancing progressive policies. This arrangement, aimed at providing stability and a platform for reforms, now faces scrutiny amidst electoral defeats and internal dissensions, revealing the fragility of this political marriage.

Bonnie Crombie, Ontario’s Liberal leader, has notably distanced herself from Trudeau, particularly on contentious issues like the federal carbon levy. Emphasizing her limited interactions with Trudeau and her policy distinctions, Crombie strategically aims to rebuild the Ontario Liberal brand independently. Her recent comments highlighting Premier Doug Ford’s closer ties to Trudeau underscore a tactical pivot to avoid fallout from federal controversies affecting provincial dynamics.

Video: Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie on the Trudeau effect

October 24 2014

In Alberta, newly elected NDP leader Naheed Nenshi has gone a step further by advocating for severing ties with Jagmeet Singh’s federal NDP. Nenshi’s campaign stressed the need for provincial autonomy, free from federal policies that do not resonate with Alberta’s electorate. This move reflects longstanding frustrations within provincial branches over federal control and policy misalignments, notably on issues like the Trans Mountain pipeline.

News: New Divorce Party? Naheed Nenshi’s to-do list as Alberta’s new NDP leader includes breaking up with Jagmeet Singh’s federal party

March 22, 2024

These actions by Crombie and Nenshi are not isolated incidents but symptomatic of a broader political shift. They serve as cautionary tales about the limitations and risks of political coalitions. While such alliances can offer short-term stability and legislative success, they often prove unstable and lead to long-term repercussions.

Coalitions necessitate ongoing negotiation and compromise, which can dilute party identities and alienate core supporters. Criticisms of the Liberal-NDP agreement highlight concerns that the NDP may have sacrificed its distinctiveness for limited policy gains. Singh’s alignment with the Liberals has not shielded him from electoral setbacks and has prompted internal debates about the party’s direction and effectiveness.

October 17, 2023

Fundamentally, coalitions like the Liberal-NDP agreement face the temptation to cling to power at the expense of political integrity and responsiveness to voter concerns. Over time, such arrangements become untenable as internal and external pressures mount. Voters often view these coalitions as cynical power grabs, leading to disillusionment and declining support. The recent electoral setbacks for both parties reflect growing voter dissatisfaction.

As political times evolve, the maneuvers by Crombie and Nenshi underscore the need for political renewal and authenticity. Provincial leaders distancing themselves from beleaguered federal counterparts signal that clinging to power through tenuous coalitions is not a sustainable strategy. Political parties must prioritize rebuilding trust, clarifying their identities, and addressing the evolving needs of constituents.

July 24, 2015

The unraveling of the Liberal-NDP alliance serves as a stark reminder of the perils inherent in political coalitions. As the political landscape shifts, leaders must adapt, engage genuinely with voters, and approach governance with integrity and clarity. Crombie and Nenshi’s cautionary tales highlight the urgent need for parties to reevaluate strategies and reaffirm their core values. (AI)

Thursday June 27, 2024

June 27, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 27, 2024

*Find the animated version of this cartoon here!

Biden vs. Trump: The Debate From Hell – A Spectacle of Epic Proportions

September 29, 2020

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, gather ’round for what promises to be the most entertaining show of the decade! Forget your popcorn—this is kettle corn territory, folks. In one corner, we have the reigning champ of gaffes and whispers, President Joe Biden. In the other, the master of mayhem, the Sultan of Shenanigans, former President Donald Trump. Welcome to the 2024 Presidential Debate: The Circus Edition!

According to Edith Olmsted of The New Republic, Trump’s approach to debate prep involves more casual chats with his fans than rigorous policy discussions. Picture him lounging in a gilded room, tossing out one-liners to Chris Stigall like a stand-up comedian at an open mic night. Meanwhile, Biden is reportedly holed up at Camp David, cramming for the debate like it’s a college final he forgot about until the night before.

Opinion: Donald Trump has adopted a wild approach to preparing for his debate against Joe Biden

October 31, 2020

CNN’s Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, whom Trump has preemptively accused of bias, will moderate this spectacle. Think of them less as referees and more as lion tamers trying to keep our two aging beasts from mauling each other—or themselves. Tapper and Bash, both seasoned veterans, are well-prepared for this, having described the 2020 debate as a “hot mess” and a “s—show.”

News: Thursday’s presidential debate moderators called Trump-Biden 2020 clash a ‘hot mess,’ worse

Expectations are lower than a limbo stick at a geriatric disco. James Hibberd from The Hollywood Reporter sets the stage perfectly, comparing the debate to a Renaissance fair run by an 86-year-old king who refuses to retire. Our candidates are like two King Georges clinging to power, except they’re not battling over turkey legs—they’re vying for control of the free world.

Opinion: Biden vs. Trump Rematch: Are You Ready for the Debate From Hell?

November 6, 2012

Biden’s goal? To appear coherent for 90 minutes. Trump’s? To not seem utterly unhinged. It’s like watching a high-wire act without a safety net, and we’re all holding our breath, waiting for someone to fall.

One welcome change: the introduction of mutable microphones. This isn’t just a nod to basic decorum; it’s a necessity. Picture Trump’s mic going silent mid-rant, his face turning beet red as he gestures wildly to an audience that isn’t there. Meanwhile, Biden’s team has nixed the live audience, which Hibberd argues makes him look a bit cowardly. After all, shouldn’t a president be able to handle a few boos if he’s going to handle global crises?

October 3, 2012

Speculation is rife that Trump might pull another no-show, a stunt he’s performed in the past. If he does show up, expect a barrage of accusations about Biden’s supposed performance-enhancing drugs, a projection straight out of Trump’s playbook. On the other side, Biden’s likely to have a few choice words ready, aiming to keep his cool under the expected barrage of Trumpian interruptions.

So, sit back, relax, and prepare to watch through your fingers. This debate promises to be less about policies and more about who can out-entertain the other. It’s less a political event and more a reality TV showdown. In the words of Hibberd, get the kettle corn ready. This is going to be one hell of a show.

Whether it ends in chaos, comedy, or catastrophe, one thing’s for sure: we won’t be forgetting this debate anytime soon. So tune in, America! Your democracy might be at stake, but at least you’ll be entertained. (AI)

Tuesday June 18, 2024

June 19, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 18, 2024

*Watch the animated version here!

Russia’s Desperate Arms Deal with North Korea: A Sign of Decline

September 14, 2023

Once a proud exporter of advanced weaponry, Russia now finds itself in the humiliating position of importing lower-quality arms from North Korea. This drastic shift underscores the deteriorating state of Russia’s military-industrial complex and the broader implications for its global standing.

In a strikingly ironic twist, the nation that once supplied cutting-edge technology to the world now seeks sustenance from a pariah state infamous for its substandard military equipment. North Korea’s support, including ballistic missiles and munitions, is crucial for Russia as it struggles to maintain its war efforts in Ukraine. The image of a former superpower relying on North Korean arms tells a bleak story about the current state of Russian research and development. It is a clear indicator that Russia is far from the industrial powerhouse that its cheerleaders in the Kremlin claim it to be.

News: Putin Arrives in North Korea as Ukraine War Redefines Ties With Kim

September 22, 2022

This unholy alliance between Russia and North Korea also highlights a disturbing new reality: North Korea has emerged as a significant beneficiary of the Ukraine conflict. Pyongyang’s economy, previously crippled by sanctions and isolation, has found new life through its arms trade with Russia. This partnership has elevated North Korea’s international status, making it no longer the sole pariah state. The shift in power dynamics is stark and troubling.

The desperation behind Putin’s move is palpable. This is the first time in 25 years that a Russian president has visited North Korea, and it is clear that Putin is not doing so out of choice but out of necessity. Russia’s reliance on a nation with an outdated military force and equipment reveals the dire state of its own military capabilities. The fact that Putin must beg for weapons from North Korea suggests that the Russian army is in a desperate situation, willing to take anything it can get.

June 25, 2019

The broader geopolitical implications of this alliance are equally concerning. The axis of Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran is a mashup of nefarious actors with no common cause other than the need to feed off each other. Unlike the more ideologically aligned Western Europe and the US, this grouping is a coalition of convenience rather than principle. Even within this alliance, Russia’s position is precarious. China and India, while maintaining diplomatic relations with Russia, view it as a distraction from their economic ambitions. Putin’s overtures to North Korea can be seen as a last resort after likely rejections from more powerful nations like China and India.

Reflecting on the past, it is evident how far Russia has fallen. Once a major player in the G8, now it is reduced to seeking partnerships with third-world dictatorships. The contrast is stark and disheartening. The likes of North Korea, Russia, and China represent some of the most oppressive police states in the world, making a mockery of any notions of freedom and democracy. If there ever was an open-air prison, these nations fit the bill perfectly.

Hews: Putin arrives in North Korea ahead of talks with Kim Jong-un

May 1, 2018

Putin’s visit to North Korea, hat in hand, begging for arms that his own industry cannot provide, is a clear sign of his desperation. It exposes the toothless tiger that Russia has become under his rule. The international community must recognize this vulnerability and seize the moment to hold Putin accountable. It is time to finish the job and bring Putin to justice at the International Criminal Court.

In summary, Putin’s North Korea visit and the resultant arms deal reflect not just a tactical move but a strategic capitulation. It signals a significant decline in Russia’s global standing and military capability. The world must take note of this desperation and act decisively to prevent further destabilization by this crumbling alliance of authoritarian regimes. (AI)

Friday June 14, 2024

June 14, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

By Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 14, 2024

*Animated making-of-clip, with hi-fi sound here.

Pierre Poilievre’s Wilful Ignorance is a Betrayal of Leadership

June 7, 2024

Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, has refused to access a classified national security and intelligence report on foreign interference, making him the sole federal leader to do so. This decision is not just baffling; it is a dereliction of duty. Leadership is about confronting uncomfortable truths and making informed decisions for the nation’s welfare. Poilievre’s choice to remain in the dark is a display of wilful ignorance that raises serious concerns about his suitability to lead the country.

Perhaps Poilievre is scared of finding out? If members of his party are involved in foreign interference, he would be expected to act decisively. By avoiding the briefing, Poilievre can continue his blissful ignorance and place all the blame on the Liberals. Indeed, the Liberals have much to answer for, having been slow to address foreign interference, but this does not absolve Poilievre from his responsibilities. As the Official Loyal Opposition, it is his job to scrutinize and act upon such crucial matters. His refusal to do so is a failure in his role, raising questions about whether he would similarly decline to see national security reports if he became Prime Minister.

Analysis: A ‘cloud of suspicion’ hangs over Parliament — and no one knows what to do about it

May 5, 2023

Poilievre’s actions demonstrate an unwillingness to genuinely understand the issues at hand. The Conservatives have multiple members on the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) that reviewed the intelligence and wrote the report. If his party is implicated, it is up to him to confront this head-on and take necessary actions. Instead, he chooses to criticize the Liberals without taking proactive steps to address potential threats within his own ranks.

Running for Prime Minister of Canada means dealing with classified information. Access to such reports has not prevented other leaders from advocating for truth and accountability. Canada’s allies in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance routinely manage to balance secrecy with public accountability. Poilievre should follow their example, showing that he can handle sensitive information responsibly while still taking decisive action.

March 17, 2023

For the sake of our country, this is an opportunity for Poilievre to lead where Trudeau has failed. Poilievre could go on camera and declare, “If anyone in the party is helping a foreign power, it will be dealt with decisively. I will not allow it on my watch.” This would demonstrate real leadership and reassure Canadians that he prioritizes national security over partisan politics. Yet, his refusal to engage with the classified report suggests he prefers plausible deniability, especially considering the report includes information on two Conservative leadership races, one of which he won. This behaviour suggests he fears what he might find.

Poilievre’s actions reveal a preference for obfuscation and partisan attacks rather than responsible governance. This is a matter of national security with hints of possible treason. As a citizen and taxpayer, I want to know who is responsible, regardless of their party affiliation. Poilievre should want to know that too if he genuinely aspires to lead the country.

Video: Poilievre ‘deeply irresponsible’ for not reading foreign interference report: NDP leader

April 26, 2024

It is stunning that a leader of the opposition, and a likely next governing party leader, would refuse to view highly sensitive documents crucial to national security. By doing so, Poilievre fails to show the leadership required during times of geopolitical upheaval. Elizabeth May, despite leading a party with only two seats, has shown more seriousness and responsibility on this issue than Poilievre.

While he slams Trudeau for being soft on foreign interference, he refuses to take the opportunity to show what responsible leadership looks like. This was his moment to rise above partisan politics and he chose to stay in the shadows. Canadians deserve leaders who are willing to face the truth and act decisively for the good of the country. Poilievre’s refusal to engage with the classified report is not just disappointing; it is a dangerous abdication of responsibility. In times of national security threats, Canadians need leaders who will confront the issues head-on, not hide from them. Poilievre’s wilful ignorance is a betrayal of the leadership he aspires to. (AI)