anti-science – mackaycartoons

Tuesday June 18, 2024

June 18, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

June 18, 2024

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 18, 2024

Trust in Science and Expertise is Crucial to Preventing Future Viral Outbreaks

March 6, 2024

The COVID-19 pandemic taught us many painful but invaluable lessons. One of the most significant is the paramount importance of trusting in science and heeding the advice of health experts. As we face the potential threat of the H5N1 avian influenza, it is crucial to remember these lessons and ensure that we prevent and mitigate such dangerous viral outbreaks through informed, science-based actions.

Science is our most powerful tool in understanding and combating infectious diseases. The rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines were nothing short of miraculous, showcasing the incredible capabilities of modern scientific research. These vaccines saved countless lives and provided a pathway out of the pandemic. Similarly, ongoing research into H5N1 and other viruses holds the promise of new vaccines, treatments, and preventive measures that could protect millions.

Analysis: H5N1 Bird Flu Isn’t a Human Pandemic—Yet. American Contrariness Could Turn It into One

January 27, 2023

However, the power of science is only as effective as our willingness to embrace it. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hesitancy and misinformation led to unnecessary suffering and death. Many people were swayed by pseudoscience, quackery, and unfounded claims, often promoted by individuals with no expertise in public health. This eroded trust in health interventions and hampered efforts to control the virus.

Health experts and scientists dedicate their lives to understanding diseases and developing ways to combat them. Their advice is based on rigorous research, data analysis, and peer-reviewed studies. When they warn of potential dangers or recommend specific actions, it is because the evidence supports those conclusions.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci and organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided critical guidance that helped shape effective responses. Listening to their advice on mask-wearing, social distancing, and vaccination was key to reducing transmission and saving lives.

As we confront the threat of H5N1, it is vital to continue valuing and following the advice of health experts. The virus’s high fatality rate and recent spread to new animal hosts, including dairy cattle, highlight the urgency of taking proactive measures. Ignoring expert advice could lead to a preventable disaster. As noted by McMaster University’s Matthew Miller, “I have never been more worried in my career than I am about H5N1” due to its high case fatality rate and potential for rapid spread in new settings (Jon Wells, The Hamilton Spectator, June 17, 2024).

News:McMaster viral immunologist fears spread of bird flu virus with ‘staggering’ death rate

August 7, 2020

One of the most significant challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic was the spread of misinformation. Social media platforms and certain political figures contributed to a landscape where conspiracy theories and false information flourished. This misinformation not only caused confusion but also led to deadly consequences as people rejected proven health measures.

To prevent a similar scenario with H5N1 or any future viral threat, it is essential to combat misinformation vigorously. This requires a multifaceted approach: promoting scientific literacy and critical thinking skills to help people discern credible information from falsehoods, ensuring that health authorities and scientists communicate clearly, transparently, and frequently with the public, encouraging media platforms to prioritize accurate reporting and holding them accountable for spreading misinformation, and implementing policies to reduce the spread of false information, especially on social media.

News: A Bird-Flu Pandemic in People? Here’s What It Might Look Like

February 8, 2022

As a society, we must prioritize science and expert advice to safeguard public health. We need to invest in research, support and fund research into vaccines, treatments, and preventive measures for emerging infectious diseases. Strengthen public health infrastructure to build a resilient public health system capable of responding quickly and effectively to outbreaks. Foster trust by engaging with communities to build trust in health interventions and address concerns and misconceptions directly. Promote global cooperation by collaborating with international partners to monitor and respond to viral threats, recognizing that diseases know no borders.

The COVID-19 pandemic was a stark reminder of the consequences of ignoring science and expert advice. As we face new threats like H5N1, we have the opportunity to apply the lessons learned and protect our communities. By valuing science and listening to health experts, we can prevent needless suffering and ensure a healthier, safer future for all. (AI)

Tuesday May 14, 2024

May 14, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday May 14, 2024

Confronting the Flames of Climate Denial: A Call to Action in the Face of Escalating Wildfires

June 8, 2023

As wildfires begin to ravage Canada, leaving destruction and devastation in their wake, it’s time to confront a different kind of blaze—one fuelled not by dry vegetation and high winds, but by misinformation and climate denialism.

News: Wildfires surging in the western provinces

In the wake of yet another record-breaking wildfire season, it’s alarming to see the persistence of skepticism and denial regarding the role of climate change in these disasters. As outlined in Drew Anderson’s article “What causes wildfires? Lightning, people, climate change … and obsessively putting them out” from June 27, 2023, wildfires in Canada are often the result of a combination of factors, including human activity, such as off-road vehicles and campfires, and climate change-induced conditions like hot, dry weather and drought.

The Narwal: What causes wildfires? Lightning, people, climate change … and obsessively putting them out

January 10, 2024

Last year’s wildfires in British Columbia, Alberta, and the North Western Territories, as documented by CBC News in their report “Raging wildfires threatening western Canada force thousands to evacuate” on May 13, 2024, left thousands under evacuation orders and resulted in the destruction of vast swaths of land. This year, as reported by CBC News, the situation remains dire, with wildfires once again forcing evacuations and threatening communities across the region.

Yet, despite the evidence staring us in the face, there are still those who refuse to acknowledge the truth about climate change and its role in exacerbating wildfire risks. This skepticism is not only misguided; it’s dangerous.

January 31, 2023

The spread of misinformation and conspiracy theories, as highlighted in Olivia Rudgard and Daniel Zuidijk’s article from August 22, 2023, only adds fuel to the fire. False narratives about the origins of wildfires, from claims of arson to bizarre theories about space lasers, continue to proliferate on social media platforms, undermining efforts to address the root causes of these disasters and implement meaningful solutions.

News: Wildfires and Extreme Weather Are Driving Climate Denialism Online

As we face another potentially devastating wildfire season, it’s imperative that we confront climate denialism head-on. This means challenging false narratives, educating the public about the realities of climate change, and holding accountable those who seek to sow doubt and confusion for their own gain.

July 29, 2023

But confronting climate denialism is not enough. We must also take decisive action to address the underlying drivers of wildfires, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions, promoting sustainable land management practices, and investing in wildfire prevention and mitigation efforts.

The time for complacency is over. As wildfires continue to rage across Canada, we must heed the warnings of scientists, listen to the voices of affected communities, and unite in the fight against climate change. The flames of denial may burn bright, but with determination and resolve, we can extinguish them once and for all, and pave the way for a safer, more sustainable future for all. (AI)

Friday July 15, 2022

July 15, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday July 15, 2022

Exposure to humorous memes about anti-vaxxers boosts intention to get a COVID-19 vaccine, study finds

December 2, 2021

Pro-vaccination messaging may be surprisingly effective when delivered through humorous internet memes, according to new findings published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior. A series of studies revealed that exposure to sarcastic memes about anti-vaxxers increased UK residents’ intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The researchers suggest that the humorous memes were able to bypass the typical defense processes of people who are vaccine-hesitant.

As a vaccine emerged to combat the novel coronavirus, public health officials in Western countries grappled with convincing the population to get vaccinated. Vaccine misinformation was rampant, and officials turned to educational campaigns backed by expert sources to persuade the public that the vaccine was safe and effective.

September 15, 2021

Unfortunately, such educational campaigns can backfire, since people who are vaccine-hesitant are prone to conspiracy belief and tend to be distrustful of authoritative sources. Informational campaigns are also not designed to go viral on social media and can become easily outpaced by anti-vaccine messaging. A team of psychology researchers led by Shawn N. Geniole proposed a need for newer interventions that use messaging that is highly shareable, scalable, and unlikely to be perceived as corrupt — something like an internet meme.

“I find memes to be interesting because they can spread–and be processed by viewers–quite rapidly; therefore, any messages/text within memes may have the potential to persuade/inform others efficiently,” explained Geniole, an assistant professor at University of the Fraser Valley.

Thursday August 19, 2021

“Further, that they’re processed and spread rapidly also means that they may reach and influence individuals who would otherwise not encounter–or might even try to avoid–such information. For example, the type of humor within memes, which often belittles or makes fun of certain groups of individuals or their beliefs, may lead some to rethink their views or to distance themselves from others who hold these views. Can exposure to these types of memes changes one’s beliefs or the extent to which they identify with certain groups? These were the types of ideas/questions that interested me when we started this project.”

The researchers designed six studies involving a total of 1,584 residents of the United Kingdom. In each of these studies, participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental or a control condition. The experimental group viewed a series of eight vaccination-related internet memes that had been collected by researchers using Google Image Search, and the control group viewed control images. While the memes varied slightly depending on the study, the majority of them expressed sarcasm toward anti-vaxxers.

June 17, 2021

After viewing the images, participants were asked whether they intended to get vaccinated against COVID-19. A combined analysis of all six studies revealed that exposure to the vaccine memes increase participants’ intentions to get vaccinated, even after accounting for gender, age, and political orientation.

The study authors say that future research will be needed to explore the psychological processes through which internet memes may impact vaccine attitudes and behaviors. It will also be important to test how this effect may change depending on contextual factors, such as the stages of vaccine development.

The study, “Preliminary evidence that brief exposure to vaccination-related internet memes may influence intentions to vaccinate against COVID-19”, was authored by Shawn N. Geniole, Brian M. Bird, Alayna Witzel, Jordan T. McEvoy, and Valentina Proietti. (PsyPost)

Letters to the Editor, the Hamilton Spectator, Tuesday July 15, 2022

The Hamilton Spectator

Booster cartoon 1:

Regarding MacKay’s pro-booster cartoon Friday: It is obvious, Mr. MacKay, how little you’ve grown in a year and a half!

Marilyn Haughton, Hamilton

Booster cartoon 2:

The Facebook comments on MacKay’s cartoon depicting anti-vaxxers was predictable, with those same anti-vaxxer idiots whining about being treated unfairly.

In my view, his depiction was too kind. These people are public-health hazard losers and deserve to be shunned by all decent people.

Anna Carter, Burlington

Saturday November 6, 2021

November 6, 2021 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday November 6, 2021

Many conservatives have a difficult relationship with science

Many scientific findings continue to be disputed by politicians and parts of the public long after a scholarly consensus has been established. For example, nearly a third of Americans still do not accept that fossil fuel emissions cause climate change, even though the scientific community settled on a consensus that they do decades ago.

June 17, 2021

Research into why people reject scientific facts has identified people’s political worldviews as the principal predictor variable. People with a libertarian or conservative worldview are more likely to reject climate change and evolution and are less likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19.

What explains this propensity for rejection of science by some of the political right? Are there intrinsic attributes of the scientific enterprise that are uniquely challenging to people with conservative or libertarian worldviews? Or is the association merely the result of conflicting imperatives between scientific findings and their economic implications? In the case of climate change, for example, any mitigation necessarily entails interference with current economic practice.

We recently conducted two large-scale surveys that explored the first possibility – that some intrinsic attributes of science are in tension with aspects of conservative thinking. We focused on two aspects of science: the often tacit norms and principles that guide the scientific enterprise, and the history of how scientific progress has led us to understand that human beings are not the centre of the universe. (Continued: The Conversation)

Friday November 5, 2021

November 5, 2021 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday November 5, 2021

Ontario and Quebec bow to anti-vax hospital workers

Chalk up two big points for the nation’s anti-vax brigade. And two ridiculous own-goals by the governments of Ontario and Quebec.

August 31, 2021

In a dispiriting display of spinelessness, both provinces decided Wednesday against requiring their health care workers to do the morally right and medically necessary thing — and be vaccinated against COVID-19. While Ontario Premier Doug Ford announced he would not proceed with a vaccination mandate, Quebec Health Minister Christian Dube actually scrapped a vaccination edict already in place.

Both decisions will worry and, yes, endanger patients. They won’t know whether the person treating them has had the jab and whether, if unvaccinated, that individual might put them at heightened risk of catching COVID-19. Both decisions also do a profound disservice to the overwhelming majority of health care workers who’ve acted responsibly by taking their jab. They should have the right to work in the safest environment possible, something only possible after mass vaccinations.

April 1, 2021

So why did it come to this? In both provinces, the decisions were motivated by the unsubstantiated fear that vast numbers of hospital workers would quit rather than be vaccinated. Ford cited “the potential departure of tens of thousands of health-care workers” if his government mandated vaccinations instead of leaving the decision to individual hospitals and health organizations, many of which have imposed their own vaccine requirements.

But the Ontario Hospital Association and the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario both pleaded with the premier to set down a consistent approach across the entire provincial health care system. Instead, Ford has, by default, saddled Ontarians with a confusing, far less effective, patchwork of rules. As for the premier’s numbers, they’re outdated. His own health minister, Christine Elliott, said so. And while she agreed the number of potential staff losses would have been “significant” she failed to provide precise numbers to back up her assertion.

September 15, 2021

To be fair, it’s true that at least some health care providers would be stubborn enough lose their jobs rather than be vaccinated. But rather than cave in to their threats and irrational, irresponsible behaviour, the governments of Ontario and Quebec should have stood firm and called their bluff. No health care worker would ever be forced to have a vaccine injected into their arm. But those who refused would deal with the consequences.

In marked contrast, Air Canada has stuck to its vaccine-mandate guns and suspended 8,000 of its 27,000 employees for refusing to get the jab. Its planes are still flying. The Toronto District School Board has put nearly 800 workers on unpaid leave because they failed to disclose their vaccination status. The schools remain open. If an airline trying to protect its customers and staff and a board trying to guard its students and employees are willing to go to these lengths, so should the Ontario and Quebec governments when the integrity of their hospitals is at stake. Their health care systems would have gone on, too, likely with more fully vaccinated workers.

January 27, 2021

Ford’s decision is especially puzzling considering that another branch of the provincial government, the Ministry of Long-Term Care, has mandated COVID-19 vaccines for anyone working in care homes. Workers in these facilities face termination unless they show proof of vaccination by Nov. 15. Go figure. Why do some of our key leaders seem incapable of running a mass vaccination initiative?

It now seems only a matter of time before Canadian children aged five- to 11-years-old will be eligible for a COVID vaccine. But parents aware of Ford’s laissez-faire approach to vaccinations might erroneously conclude it’s no big deal to spare their children from the jab. If that happens, the hope of reaching the 90-per-cent vaccination level that would make this province truly safe will have faded. (Hamilton Spectator Editorial)