CBC – mackaycartoons

Thursday December 5, 2024

December 5, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday December 5, 2024

Pierre Poilievre Prepares His Performance for King Donald

December 3, 2024

In the glittering halls of Mar-a-Lago, where gilded mirrors amplify the sheen of power and influence, a diplomatic drama of 18th-century proportions unfolds. At the centre of this spectacle is Donald Trump, enthroned anew with the promise of a second reign, enjoying a resurgence of power and adoration that borders on the divine. His court teems with nobles—heads of state and political aspirants—each vying for his favour with calculated gestures and rhetorical flourish. Among them, Pierre Poilievre emerges as the noble in waiting, preparing his stagecraft to one day perform before the King himself.

For now, Poilievre watches from a distance, sharpening his rhetoric and polishing his policy ideas, all designed to catch the King’s eye and signal allegiance to his agenda. As Justin Trudeau makes his own appearances at the royal court, dining with Trump amid the glittering chandeliers and discussing tariffs, borders, and fentanyl, Poilievre critiques from afar, casting himself as the future emissary of Canada who can truly secure the King’s favour.

Exile Days

In the art of courtly intrigue, one must not only match the monarch’s will but anticipate and amplify it. Poilievre, aware of this, has taken to out-Trumping Trump in some respects. His calls for a cap on asylum-seekers and a crackdown on “false refugees” echo Trumpian themes of border security but with a sharper edge, a Canadian twist. Where Trump thunders about “building walls,” Poilievre sketches plans for “boots on the ground, scanners all around, and a stronger border.”

News: Opposition leaders talk unity following Trudeau meeting about Trump, minister calls 51st state comment ‘teasing’

This isn’t mere imitation; it’s competitive loyalty, an audition before the King’s inner circle. Consider Trump confidant Mike Waltz, one of Poilievre’s most prominent American boosters. Waltz has been singing Poilievre’s praises in the court’s antechambers, perhaps whispering into the King’s ear about the young noble’s potential. If Poilievre’s policies seem bold—like re-instituting visa requirements or detaining asylum-seekers for expedited hearings—they are meant to show not just competence but allegiance, a readiness to align Canada’s policies with Trump’s vision.

November 22, 2024

As Poilievre prepares his audition, Trudeau continues his own courtly dance, meeting Trump at Mar-a-Lago with polished deference. His rhetoric about “shared responsibilities” at the border and “partnership” on issues like illegal firearms smuggling is the language of a seasoned diplomat, carefully avoiding provocation while securing Canada’s interests. Yet, the courtly commentators—the press and the public—view his performance with skepticism.

The nobles gathered around the proverbial roundtable scoff at Trudeau’s claims that border security measures were “already in the works” before Trump’s tariff threats. The Liberal government’s budget reflects cuts, not expansions, to border enforcement, and the sudden flurry of meetings and announcements smacks of reactive appeasement. The King’s court, after all, values strength and decisiveness over perceived hesitation or duplicity.

August 31, 2024

Unlike Trudeau, who must juggle diplomacy with the optics of national sovereignty, Poilievre has the luxury of opposition. His performance need not be tempered; it can be theatrical, bold, and uncompromising. His rhetoric about Canada’s “disorder” at the border and the supposed “taking” of Canadian jobs by asylum-seekers is a deliberate appeal to the King’s sensibilities. It is the kind of language that fills the mirrored halls of Mar-a-Lago with murmurs of approval.

Opinion: Despite humiliating dinner with Trump, Trudeau is showing leadership

Still, Poilievre’s ambitions are not without risks. His policies remain vague, as critics like Campbell Clark of The Globe and Mail have noted, and his attempts to out-Trump Trump could alienate Canadian moderates. Yet, Poilievre is betting on a broader alignment with Trump’s court, one that could position him not just as a Canadian ally but as a transnational partner in a shared vision of populist governance.

January 23, 2024

The opulence of Mar-a-Lago beckons, and one can almost picture the scene when Poilievre finally secures his audience with King Donald. Powdered wigs metaphorically in place, jewels glittering in the Florida sun, the noble and the monarch will exchange witty banter, each testing the other’s resolve and vision. Poilievre, the aspiring vassal, will make his case: that he can govern Canada in a way that complements Trump’s vision for America, that he can fortify the northern border, and that he can bring order to what he describes as Trudeau’s chaos.

For now, Poilievre’s performance plays out in the Canadian court, where his policies and rhetoric are honed under the watchful eyes of his critics and supporters. But the ultimate test will come when he steps into Trump’s mirrored hall and delivers his lines, not as a noble in waiting but as a would-be peer.

Opinion: Poilievre fumbles the Trump crisis: a missed opportunity to show himself as a prime minister-in-waiting

In this diplomatic drama, the stakes are high, and the roles are clear. Trudeau is the polished envoy, playing his part with practiced elegance but struggling to maintain credibility among his peers. Poilievre is the ambitious rival, rehearsing his lines for the moment he can step into the spotlight. And Trump, the King of this glittering court, watches it all unfold, his favour as capricious as it is coveted.

The question remains: When Poilievre’s moment comes, will his performance dazzle the King—or will it merely reflect the glitter of the room?

Today’s cartoon draws inspiration from one of history’s most brilliant satirical minds: James Gillray. For those who may not know, Gillray was the 18th century’s unrivalled editorial cartoonist, skewering political elites with unmatched wit and artistry. In fact, hanging on my wall is a painted print of one of his masterpieces, The Bengal Levee, a depiction of colonial sycophancy so rich in detail and absurdity that it still resonates today. Years ago, I stumbled upon the print on eBay and couldn’t resist – its sharp commentary on power dynamics seemed timeless.

Gillray’s The Bengal Levee shows a chaotic room teeming with fawning petitioners, each jockeying for Lord Cornwallis’s attention at his weekly audiences in colonial India. The obsequious crowd, laden with gifts and flattery, clamours to win favour from the colonial ruler seated on his throne-like chair. It’s satire at its finest, showcasing the grotesque theatre of power, corruption, and human ambition.

National Portrait Gallery, London: The Bengal Levee

Sound familiar? Fast forward to today, and we see a strikingly similar dynamic playing out as leaders from around the world parade to preen before President-elect Donald Trump. Trudeau attempts to project polished diplomacy, while Poilievre (as I envision we will all one day witness inevitable PP’s fealty to the King) sharpens his populist rhetoric, conjuring bold policy proposals that aim to out-Trump Trump. The stakes are high: not just Trump’s favour, but their own political futures.

In today’s cartoon, I wanted to channel Gillray’s spirit, imagining Trump as a gilded Louis XIV-like monarch surveying a royal court of supplicants. Front and centre, Pierre Poilievre juggles axes labelled with his boldest (and Trumpiest) proposals, vying for approval with an almost theatrical flair. The absurdity of it all – the grand gestures, the calculated performances – is a reminder of how little the human dance for power has changed since Gillray’s time.

Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. Subscriptions will always be free – as long as my position remains as a staff editorial cartoonist. Thanks.

Please enjoy my making-of clip of the December 5, 2024 cartoon – sound up!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday August 14, 2024

August 14, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday August 14, 2024

CBC’s Executive Bonuses Erode Public Trust and Bolster Calls for Defunding

April 15, 2023

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) has long been a cherished institution in Canada, a bastion of national identity and public service broadcasting. However, recent actions by its leadership, particularly President and CEO Catherine Tait, threaten to undermine the public trust that the CBC has built over decades. The decision to award $18.4 million in bonuses to 1,194 employees, including substantial payouts to top executives, at a time when the broadcaster is cutting hundreds of jobs, has rightly drawn widespread criticism.

From the horses mouth: CBC paid out $18.4 million in bonuses in 2024 after it eliminated hundreds of jobs

September 29, 2017

Catherine Tait’s defence of the bonuses as “performance pay” and her assertion that the CBC is “one of the worst-funded public broadcasters in the world” may ring hollow to many Canadians. While she argues that these bonuses are part of standard compensation to retain talent and meet company goals, the optics of this decision are undeniably poor. This is especially true when some of these bonuses exceed the median family income in Canada. It’s a stark contrast that feeds into the narrative that the CBC is out of touch with the financial realities facing many Canadians.

The timing of these bonuses has also played into the hands of critics like Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, who has been a vocal proponent of defunding the CBC. Poilievre’s rhetoric about turning the CBC’s downtown Toronto headquarters into housing and his pledge to sell off federal buildings tap into a growing sentiment that public funds could be better allocated. His message is gaining traction not only among his base but also among those who have traditionally supported the CBC but are now disillusioned by its leadership’s decisions.

News: ‘I can’t wait to defund the CBC’: Pierre Poilievre doubles down on plan to axe CBC after board approves bonuses

November 30, 2016

A reader’s comment aptly captures this frustration: “Another use for that $18.4M in bonuses could have been to pay those 141 people that were laid off $130k each in total compensation and keep them employed.” This sentiment reflects a broader frustration with the perceived mismanagement of public funds, which is pushing even CBC supporters toward Poilievre’s camp.

The lack of transparency surrounding the decision-making process for these bonuses further exacerbates the situation. As Richard Leblanc, a professor of governance, law, and ethics, points out, the CBC should have been “completely transparent about why it was paying the bonuses.” Without clear communication, the public is left to make adverse inferences, and opposition parties are quick to capitalize on the perceived opacity.

Moreover, the board’s refusal to disclose the exact amounts paid out to the 1,194 employees, despite repeated requests from members of Parliament, only fuels suspicion. The CBC, as a Crown corporation funded by taxpayers, has a heightened responsibility to be transparent and accountable in its operations.

News: CBC paid out more than $18 million in bonuses this year after slashing hundreds of jobs

April 11, 2014

The CBC’s situation is a teachable moment not just for itself but for all Crown corporations. The public’s reaction to the bonuses highlights a growing impatience with corporate behaviour that seems to prioritize executive enrichment over the well-being of employees and the public interest.

As Canada faces an election in the coming year, the fate of the CBC hangs in the balance. The increasing support for defunding the CBC reflects a broader dissatisfaction with how public institutions are being managed. If the CBC and its leadership do not take immediate steps to restore public trust, they risk alienating the very audience they are meant to serve.

It’s long past time for Catherine Tait and the CBC’s leadership to reevaluate their priorities and practices. The path they are on not only undermines the CBC’s mandate but also threatens its very existence. For the CBC to continue to be a relevant and respected institution, it must demonstrate a commitment to transparency, accountability, and a genuine regard for the public good. Otherwise, pulling the plug on the CBC might become an increasingly accepted reality among Canadians. (AI)

Wednesday December 6, 2023

December 6, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday December 6, 2023

Balancing Austerity in Tough Economic Times: CBC’s Cuts and the Future of Canadian Media

December 1, 2023

In the face of economic challenges and calls for austerity, CBC executives recently announced significant workforce reductions and production cutbacks to address a budget shortfall of $125 million in the upcoming fiscal year. While these measures are a reflection of tough economic realities, it is crucial to consider the broader impact on the media landscape, especially on private news media, particularly newspapers grappling with declining ad revenues and bankruptcy.

Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge, in an interview on Rosemary Barton Live, acknowledged the need for the CBC to receive fair compensation for its news content in the digital era. She emphasized the importance of recognizing the value of public broadcaster news for tech giants like Google, which benefit from advertising revenue. However, St-Onge also hinted at a potential cap on CBC’s share of the $100 million fund, expressing concerns about fair distribution.

News: Heritage minister hints at adjusting funds CBC could get under Google deal

April 9, 2012

Critics argue that the recent deal between the government and Google, aimed at compensating Canadian media companies, may disproportionately benefit the CBC. The $100 million figure falls short of initial expectations, leading to skepticism and concerns about public broadcasters competing with the private sector for both ad dollars and tech funds.

In response to the proposed austerity measures, CBC/Radio-Canada announced a 10% reduction in its workforce, amounting to 800 job cuts. This decision comes amid a challenging year for Canadian media companies grappling with shrinking advertising revenues, leading to hundreds of layoffs across the industry.

CBC’s President and CEO, Catherine Tait, outlined the reasons behind the budget cuts, citing higher production costs, competition from big tech companies, and declining revenues from traditional television. The impact extends beyond job losses, with a $40 million reduction in independent production commissions and program acquisitions, affecting both English and French programming budgets.

News: CBC to lay off hundreds, cut production costs as it faces financial strain

November 30, 2016

The government’s stance on CBC’s funding remains a subject of debate, with Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre pledging to cut the budget for CBC’s English services while retaining coverage for linguistic minorities. This raises questions about the Broadcast Act’s stipulations, requiring the CBC to provide programming in both official languages.

As discussions unfold about the CBC’s role and funding, it is crucial to strike a balance that ensures the public broadcaster’s sustainability without further jeopardizing the struggling private news media sector. A transparent and equitable distribution of funds from the recent Google deal will be key to fostering a media landscape that serves the diverse needs of Canadians. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try:

Thursday July 27, 2023

July 27, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday July 28, 2023

The Absurd Shadow Cabinet of Pierre Poilievre: A Comedy of Errors

September 1, 2017

In a stunning display of political theatrics, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre unveils his aptly named “Shadow Cabinet” – a motley crew of characters that seems to have jumped straight out of a science fiction sitcom. With the country hurtling towards an inevitable federal election, Poilievre’s desperate attempt at a “great reset” aims to revitalize his party’s chances against the neck-and-neck Liberals. But as the curtains rise on this farce, it becomes apparent that Poilievre’s antics are more likely to raise eyebrows than to win hearts.

Let’s start with the “Shadow Minister of Defunding the CBC.” Poilievre’s pledge to strip the CBC of its funding has earned him cheers from his conservative base. However, the catch is that he still supports Radio-Canada’s French services. It’s like trying to take away the main course while leaving the side dishes intact – a recipe for absurdity.

Next up, we have the “Shadow Minister without Portfolio: Barbaric Cultural Practices Crisis.” Yes, you read that right! Poilievre seems to be stuck in a time warp, defending controversial policies from past campaigns that have alienated immigrant communities. Perhaps he believes it’s an effective strategy to fight for the rights of barbaric cultural practices tip lines while ignoring the reality that times have changed.

August 26, 2022

Let’s not forget the “Shadow Minister of Proud Boys and Traditional Gender Roles.” Poilievre must be hoping to attract voters from the 1950s with this one. Embracing outdated ideas of gender roles and cozying up to extremist groups like the Proud Boys is sure to win the hearts of, well, no one.

And who could overlook the “Shadow Crypto Board President”? With cryptocurrencies facing scandals and plummeting prices, Poilievre’s support for Bitcoin sounds like a punchline. Promoting a “Ponzi scheme” that lost money for investors is hardly a winning policy.

Oh, and let’s not miss the “Shadow Minister of All Lives Matter.” In a country that values diversity and inclusivity, this choice can only be described as tone-deaf and insensitive. Poilievre might as well appoint a “Shadow Minister of Ignorance and Division.”

Moving on, we encounter the “Shadow Trumpism Minister.” Because nothing says “leadership material” like emulating a divisive former U.S. president who is far from popular with a significant portion of the Canadian population.

May 13, 2022

And who could forget the “Shadow Minister of Conspiracies and Pseudo-Science”? Poilievre’s enthusiasm for anti-vaccine sentiments and promoting unfounded conspiracy theories only proves that he has a flair for the absurd.

Lastly, we have the “Shadow Apologies for Past Apologies Minister.” This is the perfect role for someone who seems to be stuck in a never-ending cycle of defending past mistakes and refusing to learn from them.

As the spotlight shines on this ridiculous cast of characters, one has to wonder if Poilievre is serious about winning the hearts of Canadians or if he’s auditioning for a role in a political comedy. It’s clear that his desperate bid for support from fringe elements and conspiracy theorists is leading him down a path of absurdity.

If Poilievre wants to be taken seriously as a leader, he needs to step out of the shadows of extremism and embrace a vision that truly represents the diverse and inclusive Canada we know and love. Until then, the show must go on – a comedy of errors that leaves Canadians shaking their heads and wondering what happened to the once-respectable Conservative Party. (AI)

Saturday April 15, 2023

April 15, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 15, 2023

Poilievre’s Label Lunacy

December 6, 2022

Pierre Poilievre, aka “Skippy” in Conservative circles, recently caused a stir on Twitter with his demand to Twitter’s Elon Musk to label CBC as a “Conservative news hater.” Poilievre, notorious for his gun-loving persona and tendency to flip-flop on issues, sent a letter insisting on the label, drawing comparisons between the public broadcaster and Russia’s Sputnik TV. However, CBC brushed off Poilievre’s antics, asserting its editorial independence protected by law, despite his reputation as an “angry man.”

The demand by Poilievre, also dubbed the “Gun Nut” by some, left many scratching their heads, with advocacy groups like FRIENDS slamming his irresponsible tactics. Poilievre, a vocal critic of public broadcasting, has a history of bashing government-funded media, but his latest Twitter tantrum has taken things to a whole new level of absurdity.

Opinion: Why CBC isn’t the enemy — no matter what Pierre Poilievre and Elon Musk may think

July 28, 2022

The brouhaha over the “Conservative news hater” label has sparked a hilarious debate over the use of labels and terminologies. Twitter’s recent change from “state-affiliated” to “government-funded” for public broadcasters like the BBC has left media outlets rolling their eyes, and questioning if Poilievre has taken comedy writing lessons from late-night talk show hosts.

As CBC contemplates how to respond to Poilievre’s demands, other media outlets like NPR have decided to quit Twitter altogether, fearing that their accounts may be inaccurately labeled next. This latest episode in the ongoing circus of Poilievre’s antics has further exposed Twitter’s questionable handling of labels, and left many wondering if politics has turned into a stand-up comedy routine.

NEWS: Poilievre’s pitch to defund CBC, keep French services would require change in law

September 13, 2022

In conclusion, Pierre Poilievre’s recent demand for a “Conservative news hater” label on CBC’s accounts has brought comedic relief to the otherwise serious debate on government funding for public broadcasters. Poilievre’s fiery antics, including his tendency to flip-flop on issues and his gun-loving persona, have drawn both amusement and bewilderment from various quarters, highlighting the absurdity and unpredictability of modern politics in the age of social media.