Congress

Thursday March 6, 2025

Trump's Court: The New Era of American Monarchy

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 6, 2025

“America is Back” – A Return to What?

The inauguration of Donald Trump in the Capitol Rotunda, a site of past chaos, highlights the deepening divides and fears surrounding his administration while Biden's preemptive pardons attempt to shield his adversaries from potential retribution against a backdrop of oligarchic influence.

January 21, 2025

The declaration of “America is back” by President Donald Trump rings through the halls of power with a resonance that’s both reassuring to some and disconcerting to others. But as we delve deeper into his policies and the current state of the nation, a pressing question arises: Back to what, precisely? The rhetoric suggests a return to greatness, yet the reality paints a picture that seems to harken back to an era less democratic and more autocratic.

Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China has been described by The Economist as an unexpected upheaval, causing a ripple of economic isolationism reminiscent of the protectionist policies of the late 19th century. Readers of The Globe and Mail express concern that these actions dismantle decades of progress toward free trade that the U.S. once championed. The United States, a founding figure in reducing global trade barriers through agreements like GATT and the WTO, now appears to be retreating to a time when tariffs were the norm rather than the exception.

News: A Combative Trump Says ‘America Is Back’ and Taunts His Political Rivals

Donald Trump’s second-term rhetoric and policies signal a shift from isolationism to economic and territorial expansionism, challenging global stability and international norms.

February 7, 2025

The editorial from The Globe and Mail paints a picture of a U.S. pivoting away from its Western allies towards the arms of the Kremlin. This shift raises questions about America’s role as a reliable ally in the post-war era, a period when it provided security and leadership against totalitarianism. Reader comments reflect unease over the abandonment of long-held security guarantees and the potential fallout for global stability. The U.S. seems to be distancing itself from the very alliances it helped to build, suggesting a return to an era of isolationism and unilateralism.

Domestically, Trump’s administration is characterized by significant upheaval, with an unelected billionaire like Elon Musk reportedly wielding power to fire civil servants. The concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals and the erosion of institutional norms evoke a time before the robust checks and balances established by the founding fathers. Reader comments express fears of a permanent alteration in governance, with democracy itself appearing to be under threat.

The escalating Canada-U.S. trade tensions, driven by President Trump's tariffs, have united Canadians across political lines and spurred retaliatory actions, while opening discussions on diversifying trade partnerships.

February 4, 2025

Trump’s rhetoric of annexing territories and embracing former adversaries echoes imperial expansionism. The notion of America “being back” might conjure images of a time when nations were led by divine kings, wielding unchecked power and pursuing imperial ambitions. This raises the question of whether Trump’s vision aligns with the democratic ideals and international cooperation that have long defined American leadership.

Opinion: Pax Americana is over. Donald Trump killed it

As Trump declares “America is back,” the question remains: Back to what historical period does he refer? Is it a return to economic isolationism, diplomatic withdrawal, and centralized power reminiscent of monarchies? For a nation that once stood as a beacon of democracy and global leadership, the current trajectory seems at odds with the principles that have guided it for over two centuries.

February 6, 2019

In this context, the call for vigilance and reflection becomes imperative. Understanding what “America is back” truly means is crucial for the nation and the world, as the implications of this rhetoric reverberate across borders and generations. The path forward must reconcile the nation’s historical ideals with the challenges and complexities of the modern world.

America is back (To c1534)

Just wrapped up another day at the drawing board, capturing the political scene. If you know my work, you’ll recall my detailed chart of English and British monarchs. In the Trump 2.0 era, though he’s been in power just six weeks, I’ve already illustrated him in royal attire a few times.

U.S. history has seen presidents compared to overbearing kings when they veer from the essence of a presidency, rooted in the republic’s founding ideals. Yet here we are with Donald Trump, the “anti-President,” echoing the Vatican’s anti-popes and Oliver Cromwell’s flirtation with kingship. Trump, who seems to relish the company of monarchs and dictators, has expressed his kingly aspirations openly.

What’s more, his followers are urging him to break term limits and push for a third term, a notion that challenges the legitimacy of democratic elections. It’s as if Trump and his circle of enablers have forgotten that a U.S. President isn’t meant to play king. With MAGA’s fealty and his grand rhetoric about territories, when Trump says “America is Back,” it feels like a nod to Tudor times

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 6, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday October 27, 2023

Mike Johnson's election as U.S. Speaker of the House represents a compromise between far-right and mainstream Republicans, raising concerns about the impact of his deeply conservative views on governance and legislative dynamics.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday October 27, 2023

The Far-Right Freedom Caucus: A Force Shaping the Speaker’s Chair

Amidst the disgraceful incidents involving legislative speakers Kevin McCarthy, Anthony Rota, and John Bercow, Greg Fergus's election as the first person of colour to hold the position of Speaker of the House of Commons in Canada marking a promising shift towards inclusive and accountable parliamentary leadership.

October 5, 2023

In the ever-shifting landscape of American politics, the ascendancy of Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House has not gone unnoticed. For those in the know, Johnson’s rise represents a compromise that ultimately pleases the far-right Freedom Caucus while avoiding the extremism symbolized by Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio. However, it is a worrisome sign for those who believe in the importance of a pragmatic and balanced approach to governance.

Mike Johnson’s relative obscurity on the national stage might be seen as an advantage by some Republicans, allowing him to introduce himself to the public on his terms. Still, there should be no mistake about his deeply conservative views on social issues, particularly regarding abortion rights and same-sex marriage. These positions will undoubtedly become ammunition in the Democrats’ efforts to paint more mainstream House Republicans with the brush of extreme conservatism as they seek to regain control of the chamber.

Opinion: Trumpist Mike Johnson is the US House speaker. There’s plenty to fear  

September 9, 2023

While Johnson is not a member of the far-right Freedom Caucus, he shares many of their positions, and this alliance was underscored by the vocal support he received from some of the most extreme House Republicans upon his nomination. His positions are far to the right of the ousted Speaker, Kevin McCarthy, who, despite his partisan attacks, understood the need for bipartisan cooperation to keep the government running. McCarthy’s willingness to pass critical legislation with Democratic votes eventually led to his downfall, a fate that may await Johnson if he fails to adapt to the realities of governing.

The fact that Johnson is the first head of the arch-conservative Republican Study Committee to hold the speaker’s gavel is a testament to the increasing influence of the far-right within the Republican Party. His ascent indicates the willingness of hard-right conservatives to break with party norms and ignore the majority’s position in their pursuit of their ideological goals. This could have significant implications for the dynamics of the House in the coming months and years.

NYT Opinion: The Speakership Is Yours, Mike Johnson. Good Luck With That.  

February 26, 2021

As the mid-November deadline for keeping the government open approaches, Johnson’s ability to navigate the spending impasse and work with a divided House will be put to the test. Whether he shares McCarthy’s willingness to cut deals with Democrats remains to be seen, but it’s clear that his alignment with the far-right will be a significant factor in his decision-making.

In the end, Johnson’s election as Speaker of the House reflects the ongoing struggle within the Republican Party between the hard-line, far-right faction and the more moderate, pragmatic members. It remains to be seen how this power dynamic will affect the legislative process, governance, and the ability of the House to address the pressing issues facing the nation. The far-right Freedom Caucus may have gotten their man in Johnson, but at what cost to the country’s ability to govern effectively and responsibly? (AI)

 

Thursday October 5, 2023

Amidst the disgraceful incidents involving legislative speakers Kevin McCarthy, Anthony Rota, and John Bercow, Greg Fergus's election as the first person of colour to hold the position of Speaker of the House of Commons in Canada marking a promising shift towards inclusive and accountable parliamentary leadership.

October 5, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday October 5, 2023

The Speaker’s Oath Betrayed: A Trilogy of Disgrace

In the grand halls of parliamentary democracy, the role of the Speaker is sacrosanct. They are meant to be impartial arbiters, guardians of decorum, and champions of justice within the legislative arena. Sadly, recent history has witnessed the disgraceful fall from grace of three individuals who held this esteemed office: Kevin McCarthy, Anthony Rota, and John Bercow.

Analysis: MPs are worried about Parliament’s reputation — and a new Speaker won’t fix things  

Kevin McCarthy: A Short-Lived Stint with Self-Interest

Kevin McCarthy’s brief tenure as Speaker of the United States House of Representatives was marked by a glaring lack of statesmanship. In a time of political polarization and pressing issues, McCarthy’s pursuit of personal agendas took precedence over the welfare of the nation. His attempt to fund the government with a bill laden with spending cuts and border policies was a textbook example of partisanship overriding national interest.

When his initial bill failed, McCarthy’s willingness to compromise came too late, exposing the consequences of political brinkmanship. The chaos that ensued ultimately led to his removal from office, marking the first time in U.S. history that a Speaker was ousted by their own House. McCarthy’s legacy will forever be marred by his failure to uphold the noble principles of the Speaker’s role – impartiality, fairness, and putting the nation’s interests before party politics.

Anaylsis: McCarthy’s Extraordinary Downfall Reflects an Ungovernable G.O.P.  

Anthony Rota: A Gaping Blind Spot in Judgment

September 27, 2023

Anthony Rota’s tenure as Speaker of the House of Commons of Canada will be remembered for a grave lapse in judgment. His decision to honuor Yaroslav Hunka, a man later revealed to have served in the Nazi Waffen-SS, exposed a shocking blind spot in Rota’s understanding of history and sensitivity.

Rota’s initial praise of Hunka as a “war hero” was not only inaccurate but also deeply offensive to those who suffered at the hands of the Nazi regime. His failure to conduct due diligence before introducing Hunka tarnished the sanctity of his office and cast a shadow on the entire Canadian parliamentary system. The subsequent calls for his resignation were inevitable and well-deserved.

John Bercow: A Legacy Tarnished by Bullying and Denial

John Bercow’s legacy as Speaker of the House of Commons of the UK will forever be tainted by allegations of bullying and harassment. His tenure was characterized by reports of mistreatment from former staff members, with Bercow denying these claims and attempting to suppress their voices.

Even in the face of damning evidence and an independent investigation that upheld multiple allegations against him, Bercow remained defiant, dismissing the findings and casting aspersions on the integrity of the process. His refusal to accept responsibility and his attempts to undermine the credibility of the Independent Expert Panel only deepened the stain on his legacy.

News: Former speaker John Bercow ‘to star in The Traitors US’  

The role of a Speaker demands the highest standards of integrity, impartiality, and accountability. Bercow’s behaviour not only failed to meet these standards but also cast a long shadow over the institution he was meant to serve.

These three individuals – Kevin McCarthy, Anthony Rota, and John Bercow – serve as stark reminders of the importance of upholding the Speaker’s oath with unwavering commitment. Their failures have not only damaged their own legacies but also eroded the trust and respect that should be inherent in parliamentary leadership.

As we celebrate the election of Greg Fergus, the first person of colour to assume the Speakership in Canadian history, let us hope that his tenure will be characterized by a return to the noble principles of impartiality, fairness, and service to the nation. The disgraceful chapters authored by McCarthy, Rota, and Bercow should serve as cautionary tales for all those entrusted with the role of Speaker, reminding them that the office is far greater than any individual’s personal ambitions or shortcomings. (AI)

 

Wednesday September 13, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday September 13, 2023

Canada’s Wake-Up Call: Confronting the Fierce Dragon of Chinese Interference

May 5, 2023

Canada’s government’s sluggish and inadequate response to Chinese foreign interference has come under scrutiny following the recent testimony of Conservative foreign affairs critic Michael Chong in Washington. Chong, who himself has been targeted by the Chinese government, emphasized the necessity of a coordinated approach between Canada and the United States to counter Beijing’s meddling in Western democracies and its harassment of diaspora communities.

Chong’s subtle revelation that the Liberal government did not promptly inform him about Chinese targeting, despite their prior knowledge, raises doubts about the government’s commitment to addressing this issue. The delayed response and reluctance to take decisive action suggest a lack of urgency in safeguarding Canadian sovereignty and democratic principles.

News: MP Michael Chong urges U.S. lawmakers to work with Canada to combat Chinese meddling  

August 1, 2023

Chong’s account of China’s repressive tactics, including the establishment of unlawful police stations in Canada, coercion of individuals to return to China, and offering rewards for those on “wanted” lists, underscores the gravity of the threat. It is evident that such tactics are incompatible with the values of a free and sovereign nation like Canada.

While Chong advocated for Canada to collaborate closely with the United States and other democracies to counter China’s actions, the challenge lies in Canada’s reliability as a partner. Canada’s failure to seize shipments suspected of exploiting forced Uyghur labor, in contrast to the United States, raises concerns about its commitment to combating human rights abuses.

June 2, 2023

Canada’s potential to become a more robust partner to the U.S. in countering Chinese interference hinges on implementing regulatory reforms and expediting natural resource projects to facilitate the export of critical minerals and natural gas. The government must follow through on these commitments to effectively support its allies in the battle against foreign interference.

News: Meet the Canadian lawmaker targeted by China  

Senator Jeff Merkley’s proposed legislation, aimed at combating transnational repression, underscores the need for a comprehensive and well-coordinated response to foreign interference. Canada must step up its efforts to safeguard its national sovereignty and protect the rights of its citizens from Beijing’s interference, acknowledging the seriousness of the threat and taking substantive action to address it. (AI)

 

Wednesday December 21, 2022

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday December 21, 2022

Impeachments, Criminal Referrals, and Trading Cards

The criminal referral of Donald Trump to the Department of Justice by a House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack is largely symbolic – the panel itself has no power to prosecute any individual.

February 11, 2021

Nonetheless, the recommendation that Trump be investigated for four potential crimes – obstructing an official proceeding; conspiracy to defraud the United States; conspiracy to make a false statement; and inciting, assisting or aiding or comforting an insurrection – raises the prospect of an indictment, or even a conviction, of the former president.

It also poses serious ethical questions, given that Trump has already announced a 2024 run for the presidency, especially in regards to the referral over his alleged inciting or assisting an insurrection. Indeed, a Department of Justice investigation over Trump’s activities during the insurrection is already under way.

But would an indictment – or even a felony conviction – prevent a presidential candidate from running or serving in office?

The short answer is no. Here’s why:

The U.S. Constitution specifies in clear language the qualifications required to hold the office of the presidency. In Section 1, Clause 5 of Article II, it states: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

These three requirements – natural-born citizenship, age and residency – are the only specifications set forth in the United States’ founding document.

January 8, 2021

But in case of insurrection, the Constitution includes no qualification regarding those conditions – with one significant exception. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies any person from holding federal office “who, having previously taken an oath … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

The reason why this matters is the Department of Justice is currently investigating Trump for his activities related to the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol. And one of the four criminal referrals made by the Jan. 6 House committee was over Trump’s alleged role in inciting, assisting or aiding and comforting an insurrection.

Even in the case of conviction and incarceration, a presidential candidate would not be prevented from continuing their campaign – even if, as a felon, they might not be able to vote for themselves.

History is dotted with instances of candidates for federal office running – and even being elected – while in prison. As early as 1798 – some 79 years before the 14th Amendment – House member Matthew Lyon was elected to Congress from a prison cell, where he was serving a sentence for sedition for speaking out against the Federalist Adams administration.

Eugene Debs, founder of the Socialist Party of America, ran for president in 1920 while serving a prison sentence for sedition. Although he lost the election, he nevertheless won 913,693 votes. Debs promised to pardon himself if he were elected.

And controversial politician and conspiracy theorist Lyndon Larouche also ran for president from a jail cell in 1992. (The Conversation)