Conservative

Thursday May 1, 2025

Canada's Conservative Party grapples with internal divisions, leadership scrutiny, and the challenge of uniting diverse ideological factions.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 1, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

The Conservative Conundrum: Disunity and Factionalism Post-Election

As Canada's election campaign nears its end, Trump's rhetoric and policies become pivotal in shaping voter perceptions of leaders Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney.

April 25, 2025

The recent federal election has laid bare the deep-rooted disunity and factionalism within Canada’s Conservative Party, underscoring a schism that has evolved over decades. As Pierre Poilievre grapples with his electoral defeat and the loss of his Ottawa-area seat, the internal blame game has commenced, revealing persistent tensions within the conservative ranks.

Pierre Poilievre’s decision to remain as leader, despite losing his seat, highlights the complexities of the current situation. His leadership style, which aligns with the populist, Alberta-centred wing of conservatism, contrasts with the Progressive Conservative tradition led by figures like Doug Ford. This ideological rift, dating back to the eras of Preston Manning and Stephen Harper, continues to challenge the party’s cohesion.

News: ‘It’s an unmitigated disaster’: Conservative insiders debate Pierre Poilievre’s future as leader after election defeat

Pierre Poilievre's plan to invoke the notwithstanding clause threatens Canadian democratic norms and sets a dangerous precedent for federal governance.

April 19, 2025

The schism within the Conservative Party has evolved through key historical milestones. During the 1990s, the Reform Party, led by Preston Manning, emphasized Western interests, fiscal conservatism, and skepticism of federal intervention. Stephen Harper later unified the Reform and Progressive Conservative factions to form the modern Conservative Party, but underlying tensions have persisted.

The party has seen recent leadership turnover reflecting these internal divisions. Andrew Scheer, who led the party in the 2019 election, was criticized for being too socially conservative and was subsequently replaced. Erin O’Toole, who moved the party towards the centre, faced rejection in the aftermath of the 2021 election, highlighting the ongoing struggle to find a leadership approach that resonates with the entire conservative base.

April 9, 2025

Poilievre represents the values of the Reform wing, focusing on conservative fiscal policies and provincial autonomy. His allies, such as Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, share these priorities. In contrast, Doug Ford embodies the centrist Progressive Conservative tradition, emphasizing pragmatic governance and coalition-building. Tim Houston of Nova Scotia aligns with this more moderate approach.

The election results have intensified internal blame and criticism. Figures like Jamil Jivani have accused Ford of undermining Poilievre’s campaign, while Ford’s public criticisms of Poilievre’s strategy reflect deeper personal and political tensions. Ford’s strategic decision to distance himself highlights his alignment with more centrist values and his potential ambitions within the broader Conservative movement.

News: MP accuses Doug Ford of ‘sabotaging’ federal election campaign by helping Liberals

Danielle Smith's alignment with Trump complicates Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's campaign as he seeks to distance the party from divisive politics while facing criticism over perceived weaknesses.

March 25, 2025

The schism is further exacerbated by Poilievre’s perceived lack of outreach and collaboration with key political figures, including Ford. This strategic misstep isolated his campaign and limited its appeal beyond its populist base. The absence of a united front, especially in critical regions like Ontario, hindered the party’s electoral success.

The Conservative Party now faces a critical juncture. Addressing internal divisions and fostering unity will be essential for future success. The challenge lies in balancing the priorities of both factions and presenting a cohesive platform that resonates with a national audience.

Doug Ford's evolution from a controversial provincial leader to a national unifier fills a leadership void left not just by Justin Trudeau, but also Pierre Poilievre, as Canada faces economic challenges similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, while dealing with his lingering past controversies.

January 15, 2025

Reconciliation efforts must focus on bridging the gap between the Reform and Progressive Conservative traditions. This involves finding common ground on key issues, fostering dialogue, and embracing a leadership approach that unites rather than divides.

As the Conservative Party stands at a crossroads, the recent election serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by disunity and factionalism. Pierre Poilievre’s leadership, now under scrutiny, embodies the complexities of balancing the party’s diverse ideological factions. His approach and ability to navigate these internal tensions will significantly influence the party’s trajectory.

Ultimately, the Conservative Party’s path forward hinges on its capacity to reconcile internal differences and adapt to the evolving political landscape. As Poilievre’s leadership is evaluated, there is a pressing need for reflection and adaptation to chart a course that ensures future success and stability. The party must seize this moment to unify and present a vision that resonates across the Canadian political spectrum.

Tuesday April 29, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 29, 2025

Double Leadership Revelations: From Parliament to Papal

As Canadians head to the polls to elect a new government, another significant decision is unfolding in Vatican City, where the Roman Catholic conclave is set to elect a new Pope. Both events mark crucial turning points that will shape the future for millions across the globe.

Canada’s Political Crossroads

2021 Federal Election

Canada stands at a critical juncture, with voters determining the composition of the 45th Parliament following a period of political uncertainty. This election comes after the resignation of former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the interim leadership of Mark Carney, who has yet to secure a mandate from the electorate.

The political landscape has been further complicated by the re-election of Donald Trump as U.S. President in 2024. Trump’s administration has imposed trade tariffs on Canada and engaged in controversial rhetoric suggesting Canada consider becoming the 51st state. These actions have sparked widespread opposition across Canada, fuelling a surge of patriotism and economic nationalism.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has emerged as a prominent figure during this period, championing Canadian sovereignty and economic independence. His recent snap election victory, centred on opposing Trump’s tariffs, has bolstered his status as a national leader. Ford’s “Canada Is Not For Sale” campaign has resonated with many Canadians, serving as a rallying cry against external pressures and a call for unity.

In contrast, federal Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has faced criticism for not effectively addressing the Trump issue in his campaign. As Canadians cast their votes, the question remains whether they will embrace Ford’s proactive leadership style or opt for a different path under Carney or Poilievre.

A New Chapter for the Vatican

The 2025 papal conclave is poised to shape the future of the Catholic Church, balancing tradition and modernity as diverse global leaders vie for the papacy.

April 28, 2025

Simultaneously, the Roman Catholic Church faces its own momentous decision as cardinals gather in conclave to elect a new Pope following the resignation of Pope Francis due to health reasons. The conclave seeks a leader to guide the Church through contemporary challenges, including issues of modernization, inclusivity, and global influence.

As both Canada and the Vatican await the outcomes of these pivotal decisions, the world watches closely. The choices made today will have far-reaching implications, influencing not only the future of Canadian governance and international relations but also the spiritual direction of over a billion Catholics worldwide.

In this moment of reflection and decision, Canadians and Catholics alike consider the values and visions that will best guide them through the complexities of the modern era. Whether in the halls of Parliament or the sacred chambers of the Vatican, the pursuit of leadership that embodies resilience, compassion, and unity remains a shared aspiration.

Monday April 28, 2025

The 2025 papal conclave is poised to shape the future of the Catholic Church, balancing tradition and modernity as diverse global leaders vie for the papacy.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Monday April 28, 2025

Conclave 2025: A Crossroads of Tradition and Change

As the Catholic Church gears up for the 2025 papal conclave, the stakes are exceptionally high. This election follows the passing of Pope Francis, a pontiff renowned for his progressive stance on numerous issues and his efforts to globalize the College of Cardinals. The conclave, set to begin on May 7th in the Sistine Chapel, will see 135 cardinal electors participating from 71 countries, reflecting the international diversity championed by Pope Francis.

The conclave will determine whether to continue on the progressive path set by Pope Francis or pivot towards more conservative leadership. This decision will profoundly impact the Church’s stance on critical issues like climate change, social justice, and interfaith dialogue. With a significant number of non-European cardinals, there’s a strong possibility of electing a pope from the Global South, further emphasizing the Church’s worldwide reach and influence. The new pope will need to balance upholding traditional Catholic values with addressing modern challenges, such as declining membership in certain regions and the need for reform within the Church’s bureaucracy.

Analysis: The ‘Papabiles’: Six men who could become the next pope following the papal conclave

Among the leading candidates, Cardinal Pietro Parolin of Italy stands out as a seasoned diplomat and traditional choice, appealing to those seeking stability. Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines is known for his progressive leanings, emphasizing inclusivity and social justice, which resonates with younger, more diverse segments of the Church. Cardinal Peter Turkson from Ghana is another strong contender, with his leadership in addressing global issues and his African heritage reflecting the Church’s commitment to diversity. Cardinal Péter Erdő of Hungary is recognized for his conservative theological views, appealing to those who wish to reinforce traditional Catholic doctrines.

The outcome of the conclave is unpredictable, and both media and betting markets are closely watching the proceedings. With security measures in place to ensure the conclave’s integrity, the gravity of this decision for the Church’s future cannot be understated. For further insights into the dynamics of the conclave and potential leaders who could shape the future of the Catholic Church, readers can explore detailed articles on Vatican Conclave 2025 expectations, potential candidates for the next pope, and the stakes of the 2025 papal election.

This editorial cartoon was first published March 7, 2013

Tuesday April 15, 2025

The 2025 Canadian election sees major parties sidestepping climate change, prioritizing immediate economic concerns while the urgency of the climate crisis remains unaddressed.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 15, 2025

Climate Change Takes a Backseat in Canada’s 2025 Election

Wednesday March 19, 2025

March 19, 2025

As Canadians head to the polls in 2025, the pressing issue of climate change seems to have been relegated to a whisper amidst the cacophony of economic concerns, tariffs, and geopolitical tensions. The two major parties, the Poilievre Conservatives and the Carney Liberals, have conspicuously sidestepped the climate crisis in their campaigns, raising critical questions about their commitment to addressing what remains one of the most urgent challenges of our time.

Analysis: Election 2025: a voter’s guide to carbon taxes, natural resources and other key environment issues in Canada

In recent elections, climate change was at the forefront, with parties vying to present credible plans to reduce emissions and transition to a sustainable future. However, today, the political landscape has shifted dramatically. According to Vote Compass data, environmental issues have plummeted in voter priority, eclipsed by immediate economic pressures and Canada-U.S. relations. Yet, the urgency of the climate crisis has not diminished; it is merely overshadowed.

Pierre Poilievre's push for a carbon tax election is an opportunity for Canadians to confront the costs of climate inaction—but the debate must focus on real solutions, not just slogans.

September 25, 2024

The Conservatives’ Concerning Silence: Pierre Poilievre’s Conservatives have adopted a strategy that sidesteps comprehensive climate policy. By framing climate change as a “global problem” and proposing Canadian LNG exports as a solution to reduce global coal usage, Poilievre avoids committing to domestic emissions targets. This absence of a solid, actionable plan is concerning and unacceptable. While economic growth and job creation are vital, they cannot come at the expense of ignoring a crisis that demands immediate and sustained action.

News: Climate change fades as a campaign issue as tariffs dominate federal election

Despite the increasing devastation caused by climate-fuelled hurricanes, backed by data proving dramatic temperature increases in the Gulf of Mexico, political denialism, lack of media attention in the United States, and a lack of courageous leadership continue to obstruct meaningful action on the climate crisis.

October 10, 2024

The Liberals’ Temporary Retreat: On the other side, Mark Carney’s Liberals have made a strategic retreat by eliminating the consumer carbon price. This move, influenced by public dissatisfaction and economic pressures, might be seen as a temporary concession—a pragmatic pause rather than a permanent shift. For those concerned about climate change, this decision is a double-edged sword: it alleviates immediate economic burdens but risks undermining long-term climate goals.

The hope remains that this pause is just that—temporary. The Liberals must return to the table with a robust communications strategy, one that clearly articulates the benefits of carbon pricing and other climate policies. The Trudeau Liberals’ rollout of the carbon tax was fraught with challenges, allowing the Poilievre Conservatives to hijack the narrative and cast it as a burden rather than a necessary step towards sustainability.

Analysis: In 2021, there was nearly a consensus on climate change. In 2025, Carney and Poilievre are far apart

Trudeau's unwavering support for carbon pricing in the face of opposition underscores its essential role in Canada's climate action, contrasting with Pierre Poilievre's lack of a credible alternative, emphasizing the imperative for pragmatic solutions in confronting the urgent threat of climate change.

March 14, 2024

A Call for Courage and Clarity: The reluctance of both parties to address climate change head-on is a disservice to Canadians and future generations. While other issues understandably demand attention, the climate crisis cannot be perpetually postponed. It requires bold leadership and a commitment to transparent, effective policies that balance economic growth with environmental stewardship.

The 2025 election should have been an opportunity to strengthen Canada’s resolve in fighting climate change, not a retreat into the shadows of political convenience. As voters, we must demand more from our leaders—a clear, unwavering commitment to a sustainable future. The time for silence is over; the climate cannot wait.

The Illusion that Climate Change is a Non-Issue – This cartoon is bound to ruffle feathers among both Liberal and Conservative partisans. Yet, as I’ve stated before and will reiterate, my allegiance is to truth, not to any political party. Editorial cartoonists should be impartial, challenging all sides equally. Our purpose is to provoke thought, which naturally may offend those with entrenched political loyalties.

Supporters of Pierre Poilievre might argue against the depiction of him as a climate denier, while Liberals may question why their leader is depicted alongside him. However, both leaders share a stance against the carbon tax. The previous government under Justin Trudeau introduced a well-intentioned tax and rebate scheme aimed at taxing the largest consumer polluters—those with multiple cars, properties, and frequent travel habits—while benefiting the environmentally conscious and less affluent citizens. Unfortunately, Trudeau failed to effectively communicate the policy’s benefits, allowing Poilievre to exploit this communication gap and rally against it.

The consumer carbon pricing scheme, a key tool for meeting Canada’s Paris Agreement commitments, now teeters on the brink of extinction. Mark Carney, in an unexpected move, completed Poilievre’s “Axe the Tax” campaign, dismantling a program that had potential for significant environmental impact.

If Poilievre assumes office, the illusion of his environmental concern will dissipate, aligning with climate-denying regimes. Conversely, if Carney takes the helm, there’s a glimmer of hope for reintroducing consumer carbon taxes, though he remains reticent about his plans, and his supporters remain uncurious.

We find ourselves in a precarious position, seemingly ignoring the gravity of climate change, influenced by misinformation and rhetoric from a conservative leader who dismisses the climate crisis. Drill baby drill, is the mantra of Conservatives, a familiar refrain to was is heard in the south – yes the fossil fuel sector is important especially in light of tariff turmoil, but it is imperative that we remain vigilant, demanding transparency and action to safeguard our planet’s future.

Master illusionists of Environmental Policies – April 15, 2025: https://youtu.be/4wuAP1x6RMY

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

 

Wednesday April 9, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 9, 2025

Harper’s Comeback: A Rallying Cry or Risky Rewind?

Former Canadian prime ministers urge citizens to fly the flag with pride, fostering unity amid external challenges and internal reflections.

February 15, 2025

In a strategic move that highlights the ongoing influence of the Reform wing within the Conservative Party, Stephen Harper has re-entered the political spotlight, endorsing Pierre Poilievre in a bid to rejuvenate a sagging campaign. Harper’s recent appearance at a rally in Edmonton, along with Preston Manning’s warnings about another Liberal government, underscores a concerted effort to appeal to the party’s Western base and its historical roots in the Reform movement.

However, this reliance on former leaders from the Reform side may resonate well in Alberta and other Western provinces, where the Reform legacy still holds significant sway, but it offers little to inspire enthusiasm beyond these regions. The absence of strong representation from the Progressive Conservative faction within the current Conservative Party under Poilievre reflects a notable shift in the party’s identity, leaving some Progressive Conservatives feeling alienated.

News: Stephen Harper says Canada’s problems not created by Trump as he endorses Pierre Poilievre

The popularity surges of leaders like Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre highlight the perilous tendency of voters to invest unrealistic faith in political figures, underscoring the importance of maintaining critical analysis and skepticism in democratic engagement.

April 13, 2024

Harper’s endorsement, as reported by Laura Stone in The Globe and Mail, frames Canada’s current challenges as a result of Liberal policies rather than external factors like the Trump administration. This narrative aims to position Poilievre as the leader who can steer Canada in a new direction. However, as Ryan Tumilty’s article in The Toronto Star illustrates, Harper’s criticism of Mark Carney—suggesting that Carney overstated his role during the 2008 financial crisis—highlights a strategic attempt to bolster the Conservative narrative at the potential cost of alienating centrists who value Carney’s economic expertise.

Preston Manning’s recent involvement, issuing warnings about the consequences of another Liberal government, further emphasizes the Reform wing’s influence. Yet, this approach may struggle to galvanize support among voters who align more closely with the Progressive Conservative tradition. Many of these voters may find themselves more inclined to support a candidate like Carney, who embodies a moderate, centrist approach that aligns with their values.

News: Fissure among Conservatives undermining Poilievre’s pitch he’s a national unifier: experts

By Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday August 24, 2013

Reader comments from the articles provide additional insight, revealling skepticism about Harper’s and Poilievre’s appeal beyond the core Reform supporters. The comments reflect a polarized perspective, with some viewing Harper’s return as a reminder of past controversies and others questioning Poilievre’s ability to unify the country.

To succeed on a national scale, the Conservative Party under Poilievre must find a way to bridge these internal divides and offer a platform that resonates with a broader Canadian electorate. Without this balance, the party risks limiting its appeal to its traditional strongholds, making it challenging to expand its reach beyond the Western provinces. The path forward requires not just energizing the base but also embracing a more inclusive and pragmatic approach that can win the confidence of centrists across the country.

Bring Out Your Fossils

As one observes the current landscape of Canadian politics, it’s becoming increasingly clear that Pierre Poilievre is facing significant challenges, not just from the electorate, but from within his own party. The divisions within the Conservative Party are glaring, raising a critical question: Is this the type of leader Canada truly wants?

It’s no secret he doesn’t have a lot of allies in his party that he can call close friends.

Just as an aside, are we tired yet of seeing/hearing those grating political ads about solid protective arms and borders wrapping proud flags and brave soldiers?

Poilievre’s struggles to unify his party are a red flag. If he can’t foster cohesion among his own members, how can he possibly hope to unite a diverse nation? His inability to see eye to eye with key provincial leaders such as Danielle Smith in Alberta, who is vocal about Western frustrations, further highlights a disconnect that is hard to ignore. Meanwhile, his lack of alignment with Doug Ford’s Big Blue Machine in Ontario and differing perspectives with Tim Houston in Nova Scotia only underscore the ideological rifts within the party.

This disunity is further highlighted by the recent rally, where he felt the need to enlist his old boss Stephen Harper, a rejected figure from the past, to lend his voice. It’s almost as if he’s trying to resurrect a bygone era to compensate for a lack of contemporary leadership. Moreover, Preston Manning’s re-emergence from private life to express his concerns is telling. It signals a deeper sense of desperation within the party. The ghosts of the Reform Party are making a haunting appearance, and it seems like a last-ditch effort to rally the base. Yet, these figures from the past may not resonate with today’s broader electorate.

The situation begs the question: Can a leader mired in internal conflict and reliant on past figures truly guide Canada forward? It’s a moment of reflection not just for the Conservative Party but for the country as a whole. As we move forward, we must consider whether a leader with such divisive challenges is equipped to handle the complexities of leading an entire nation.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 9, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack