consultation – mackaycartoons

Saturday June 28, 2025

June 27, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 28, 2025

Carney’s Swift Bill C-5: A Canada Day Triumph Amid Ontario’s Criticism

June 4 2025

As Canada prepares to celebrate another Canada Day, Prime Minister Mark Carney has delivered on a promise that resonates deeply with the nation’s aspirations for growth and resilience. The rapid passage of Bill C-5, the “nation-building” legislation, marks a significant achievement for the newly elected Carney government, fulfilling a pledge made during the April federal election. Positioned as a strategic response to external economic threats and internal productivity challenges, Bill C-5 is being heralded as an ambitious and forward-thinking initiative.

Carney’s commitment to enacting Bill C-5 before July 1 was more than a political promise; it was a symbolic gesture of renewal and determination. His government’s ability to shepherd the legislation through both chambers at record speed is seen by many as a testament to effective leadership and the urgency of addressing Canada’s economic imperatives. The bill’s focus on reducing interprovincial trade barriers and fast-tracking projects of national interest aligns with Carney’s vision of economic diversification and strategic autonomy.

News: Carney government’s ‘nation-building’ bill becomes law despite Senate criticism

June 26, 2025

In stark contrast stands Ontario’s Bill 5, the “Protecting Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act,” which, despite being similarly focused on economic development, has attracted substantial criticism. The Ford government’s initiative is perceived by many as prioritizing economic growth at the expense of environmental safeguards and Indigenous rights. This perception is compounded by the government’s previous record, which has often been criticized for insufficient consultation and environmental stewardship. Although Ford received a mandate in a recent provincial election, the low voter turnout suggests a more tepid endorsement of his policies.

The comparatively positive reception of Carney’s Bill C-5 can be attributed, in part, to a sense of optimism and faith in a government that, as of yet, remains untested in its stewardship of the environment and commitment to meaningful consultation. The Carney administration’s promises of full-day engagement sessions with Indigenous rights holders and its emphasis on consultation reflect a desire to balance economic progress with social responsibility. This assurance, coupled with Carney’s credentials in sustainable finance and economic expertise, fosters a belief that his government can navigate the complex intersections of development and rights protection.

News: Senate passes Carney’s signature bill to fast-track major projects

June 17, 2025

While Bill C-5’s passage is a significant milestone, the real test lies ahead in its implementation. The government must ensure that the rhetoric of consultation translates into genuine dialogue and that the fast-tracking of projects does not sideline environmental and Indigenous concerns. The presence of oversight mechanisms and reporting requirements in the legislation offers some reassurance, yet vigilance from all stakeholders remains crucial.

As Canada reflects on its past and looks to its future this Canada Day, the swift enactment of Bill C-5 serves as a reminder of the possibilities inherent in bold leadership and strategic vision. While the Carney government’s record is still in the making, the potential for nation-building is palpable. It is a moment of hope and promise, one that invites Canadians to participate in shaping a future that honours both economic ambition and the values of inclusivity and sustainability.

Happy Canada Day. Have some cake, err, or some pie

It’s amazing how quickly the Mark Carney government managed to pass the ‘nation-building’ Bill C-5, just as he promised before Canada Day. This was the gift he pledged after the Liberals’ victory in the April federal election, and he’s delivered on it. When you compare this to Ontario’s Bill 5, the “Protecting Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act,” there’s a noticeable difference in public perception.

Ontario’s Bill 5 is facing much more criticism, likely because the Ford government doesn’t have a stellar record on environmental matters and consultation. Despite receiving a mandate in a recent election, the low voter turnout suggests a lack of strong backing.

Part of why Carney’s Bill C-5 is being received more positively might be due to his image as a capable and trusted CEO figure. People seem to have faith in his leadership, even though his government is untested in areas like environmental stewardship and proper consultation. On the other hand, Doug Ford is often seen as more of a lovable bumbler, which might affect how his policies are perceived.

Ultimately, when it comes to consultation, there needs to be a limit. It’s important to ensure that projects are scrutinized to minimize risks, but not to the point where development is completely blocked. There’s a fine line between being cautious and being overly restrictive, and finding that balance is key.

Why the Canada Day cartoon so early, you ask? I’m taking my usual time off during the first week of July and won’t be drawing anything for the Tuesday holiday. In the past, this time off included typical Canada Day celebrations, perhaps at a friend’s pool or a cottage, followed by a trip south to celebrate the Fourth of July with American family and friends. Sadly, this year is different due to ongoing issues caused by you know who…

If you haven’t already, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a vital platform for me, especially in the face of recent layoffs and newspaper closures impacting our industry. Don’t miss my animated editorial cartoon for June 28, 2025, below!

YouTube: https://youtu.be/4AKh2KiZ3tw

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday June 20, 2025

June 20, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 20, 2025

Balancing Boom and Respect: Ontario’s Ring of Fire Dilemma

June 6, 2025

The development of Ontario’s Ring of Fire region presents a critical opportunity for sustainable economic growth, not only for the province but for Canada as a whole. Rich in crucial minerals like nickel and gold, this area has the potential to significantly bolster our economy, particularly in the face of external pressures such as those posed by a hostile administration in the White House. However, realizing this potential requires balancing development with respect for Indigenous rights and environmental sustainability.

At the centre of this debate is Bill 5, the “Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act,” which aims to expedite the approval process for large infrastructure projects, including those in the Ring of Fire. While the bill is designed to reduce project approval times from 15 years to just two, it has been met with significant opposition. Critics argue that it undermines treaty rights and environmental protections by creating “special economic zones” that prioritize rapid development over due process.

News: Doug Ford accuses First Nations of ‘coming hat in hand’ for government money, despite treating them ‘like gold’

May 29 2025

Premier Doug Ford’s recent comments about Indigenous communities coming “hat in hand” for government support have added fuel to the fire. While his intent may have been to highlight opportunities for self-sufficiency and economic partnership, the language used was perceived as insensitive and disrespectful. Such remarks risk evoking historical stereotypes that overlook the systemic challenges faced by Indigenous communities and can undermine the trust needed for meaningful collaboration.

There is a general consensus among many stakeholders that advancing sustainable development in the Ring of Fire is essential. However, this must be pursued with a commitment to thorough and genuine consultation with Indigenous communities. Their voices and rights are pivotal in any development plans, as they have a direct stake in the land and its resources.

Opposition to development is inevitable, and there will always be dissenting voices. These positions should be respectfully considered and addressed, ensuring that the government truly represents the will of the majority while honouring its commitments to Indigenous peoples. This is not just a matter of legal obligation but a moral one, integral to the fabric of our national identity and values.

News: Doug Ford accused of ‘racist’ comments ahead of meeting with First Nations chiefs

April 23, 2006

The broader societal debate reflects a tension between economic aspirations and the need to uphold environmental and Indigenous rights. It is crucial for political leaders, like Premier Ford, to navigate these discussions with sensitivity and respect. The language used in political discourse can either bridge divides or deepen them, and it is the responsibility of our leaders to foster unity and understanding.

As we contemplate the development of the Ring of Fire under Bill 5, let us strive for a future where economic growth does not come at the expense of our principles or the well-being of Indigenous communities. It is possible to achieve a balance that respects both the land and its people, ensuring that the benefits of development are shared equitably and sustainably. This requires thoughtful leadership, open dialogue, and a commitment to reconciliation—a path that acknowledges our past and looks forward to a prosperous and inclusive future.

Premier Doug’s Inappropriate Dance

The Ring of Fire region in Ontario presents a significant opportunity for economic growth due to its rich mineral deposits. Bill 5 aims to speed up development, but it has ignited controversy over potential impacts on Indigenous rights and the environment. Premier Doug Ford’s comments about Indigenous communities seeking “handouts” have been criticized, highlighting the need for respectful dialogue. While many see development as essential, it must be pursued with careful consideration of Indigenous perspectives and environmental protections. By fostering open communication, Ontario can find a path that benefits all stakeholders and respects the land’s heritage.

Ontario’s Ring of Fire holds immense economic potential with its rich mineral resources. Bill 5 aims to fast-track development, but it’s sparked debate over Indigenous rights and environmental concerns.

Doug Ford’s comments about Indigenous communities seeking “handouts” have been criticized as lacking sensitivity. While the goal is self-sufficiency, it’s crucial to engage in respectful and meaningful dialogue with Indigenous groups who have a deep connection to the land.

He wisely took the unexpected step of apologizing alongside Indigenous leaders in a press conference after the meeting. Unfortunately for Dougie, his mea culpa came too late for my deadline.

Most agree that development is important, but it must be done thoughtfully. We need to balance economic growth with respecting Indigenous rights and environmental protections. By fostering open and honest communication, we can find a path forward that benefits everyone and honours our commitments to Indigenous communities.

If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for June 20, 2025, below!

YouTube: https://youtu.be/Dg_EiVeT_9s

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday June 17, 2025

June 17, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 17, 2025

The Need for Inclusive Governance

June 6, 2025

In a time when quick progress is often seen as vital for economic growth, the introduction of Bills 5 (Better Municipal Governance Act) and 14 in Ontario, along with the federal Bill C-5 (One Canadian Economy Act), raises important concerns about how fast-tracking decisions can affect Indigenous rights and local governance. While these bills aim to streamline processes and promote economic development, the lack of meaningful consultation with Indigenous communities and other levels of government could undermine the very progress they intend to achieve.

At first glance, Bills 5 and C-5 seem to have similar goals, both designed to enhance economic growth and simplify decision-making. However, introducing federal and provincial legislation simultaneously can create confusion among those affected regarding their specific impacts and the consultation processes involved. In a competitive economy, the need to attract investment and create jobs is clear. Yet, rushing to put these laws in place without engaging with impacted communities creates an environment filled with tension and conflict.

News: Chiefs of Ontario decry lack of consultation on Bill C-5

May 29 2025

The main issue is that insufficient consultation can lead to significant problems. When Indigenous communities are not meaningfully involved in decisions that affect their lands and resources, they may feel excluded and distrustful of government actions. This can lead to protests and opposition, as seen with the planned rallies against Bills 5 and C-5. Additionally, failing to consult properly can result in legal challenges, as Indigenous leaders have indicated that they will take action if their rights are overlooked. This can delay projects and deepen historical tensions between Indigenous communities and governments.

Consultation is not just a legal obligation; it can also lead to better outcomes for everyone involved. Indigenous communities often have valuable knowledge about land management and environmental stewardship that can improve project results. Ignoring their input is not only unfair but can also hinder economic progress. Moreover, the urgency to pass these bills might come from a desire to avoid controversy, which can appear autocratic and alienate constituents who feel their voices are not valued. Good governance requires open dialogue and compromise.

News: Anishinabek Nation chief says he briefed Ontario police on protests against Bill 5

Series: Young Doug Ford

As Ontario faces the challenges of economic development, the need for genuine consultation with Indigenous communities and other stakeholders is more important than ever. The introduction of Bills 5 and 14, along with federal Bill C-5, reflects a push for progress, but without proper consultation, we risk damaging the trust and cooperation necessary for sustainable development. To build an economy that respects the rights and voices of all Canadians, both the Ontario government and the federal government must prioritize dialogue and compromise. Only through real engagement can we create a future that honours Indigenous rights and promotes a fair and prosperous society for everyone.

Friday June 6, 2025

June 6, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 6, 2025

Also printed in the Toronto Star. Published on Reddit.

Doug Ford’s Bill 17 – Yet Another Step Backwards for Ontario’s Future

May 29 2025

Doug Ford is at it again, pushing through Bill 17, the “Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act,” with the same disregard for environmental protections that characterized his earlier attempts to dismantle the Greenbelt. Ford seems unfazed by previous voter backlash, perhaps feeling invincible with a third majority government—never mind that it was supported by less than half of the voting populace. It seems apathy has its price, and in this case, it’s a mediocre government that prioritizes quick wins over genuine progress.

Bill 17 epitomizes Ford’s governance style: quick fixes, shortcuts, and a focus on appeasing developers and well-connected allies at the expense of everyday Ontarians. By overriding local green building standards, this bill undermines cities like Toronto and Hamilton, which have been proactive in setting their own climate benchmarks. This disregard for local needs could lead to higher emissions and weaker climate defences in new developments.

Analysis: Ford government moves to override cities on green building standards

November 13, 2020

Adding insult to injury, Bill 5 complements this approach by cutting Indigenous communities out of the consultation process. Ford’s administration seems to have little interest in meaningful engagement, opting instead for expediency over respecting Indigenous rights and fostering true reconciliation.

This isn’t Ford’s first run-in with environmental neglect. His track record includes cancelling the Green Energy Act and the cap-and-trade program, decisions that not only forfeited potential revenue but also missed opportunities for sustainable job creation. Ford’s approach mirrors a wider trend where governments, both in Canada and the U.S., are rolling back environmental protections. Ottawa’s recent rollback of the carbon tax/rebate program is yet another example of this troubling regression.

October 31, 2023

In Ontario, Ford’s frequent use of Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) to fast-track development without public debate only further underscores his disdain for democratic processes. This tactic creates a shadowy parallel bureaucracy that lacks transparency and accountability.

The path Ford has chosen is one that turns back the clock on conservation and trivializes the impacts of climate change. It disenfranchises communities striving for sustainable growth. As Ontarians, we must demand better from our leaders. We deserve a government that values comprehensive reforms, respects environmental protections, and champions a sustainable future. Doug Ford’s Bill 17 and Bill 5 are steps in the wrong direction, and it’s crucial for the people of Ontario to demand more thoughtful and planet-focused policies.

Ford’s Familiar Tune

Here I am again, feeling like a broken record, lamenting yet another one of Doug Ford’s government’s anti-environmental moves. It seems like this is what we signed up for when less than half of the voting public handed him a third majority government. Sure, Ford played the Captain Canada role brilliantly, taking a strong stand against Trump earlier this year, and his dramatic flair continues to win him applause. But beneath that performative exterior, we’re stuck with the reality of what the next few years are likely to look like.

Ironically, Ford’s approach mirrors a “Trumpy” disregard for genuine consultation and environmental responsibility. It’s full steam ahead for his developer pals and provincial power brokers, with little concern for the impact on our planet. It’s almost amusing—almost—how he can be hailed as a brave critic of the U.S. President while simultaneously mirroring that same President’s approach when it comes to ignoring the climate crisis. It’s a frustrating echo, and one that I fear we’ll be hearing more of in the years to come.

Posted to Substack: Superhero of Developers. Please subscribe. It’s free!

Thursday May 29 2025

May 29, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 29 2025

Published also in The Toronto Star, and on Reddit.

Ford’s Fast Track: Mining Progress or Consultation Overlook?

October 22, 2022

Back in 2019, Premier Doug Ford’s government tried to push through Bill 66, which threatened the Greenbelt and ignored environmental protections. Public outrage forced them to backtrack. Fast forward to 2025, and it seems the government hasn’t learned its lesson with Bill 5.

Bill 5 aims to speed up mining in the Ring of Fire region by creating “special economic zones.” This move is supposed to boost the economy, but it has angered Indigenous leaders and the public. Critics argue it’s like a repeat of Bill 66, ignoring the need for proper consultation with those affected.

News: Doug Ford government amends controversial mining bill to allay First Nation concerns

January 24, 2025

To Ford’s credit, he has skillfully tackled the challenges posed by the Trump administration’s trade actions, which threatens Ontario’s manufacturing base. By focusing on developing the mining of critical minerals, he has aligned with voter support for economic resilience and growth. However, what’s lost in this expectation granted by citizens is the crucial need for proper consultation with Indigenous communities.

Despite offering amendments to allow Indigenous-led economic zones, the government’s promise to consult with First Nations after the fact seems insincere. Indigenous communities should be involved from the start, not as an afterthought.

News: Doug Ford offers amendment to First Nations on mining bill but vows to speed development through ‘economic zones’

December 11, 2018

Reader comments highlight the need for genuine engagement and respect for Indigenous rights. The government’s approach of rushing development without proper input feels like a misstep, echoing past mistakes.

Consultation isn’t just a formality; it’s essential for fair and democratic decision-making. By not learning from the past, the Ford government risks repeating history with Bill 5. It’s time for a more inclusive approach that values the input of all Ontarians and respects the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Only then can we ensure a future that’s fair and sustainable for everyone.

A Test for Doug – Editorial Cartoon for Thursday May 29, 2025

Posted to Substack

After all these years since Canada kicked off its reconciliation efforts with Indigenous Peoples, you’d think we’d have the basics down by now. One of the most fundamental practices is meaningful consultation, especially when it comes to economic development that impacts our environment—whether it’s the sea, air, or land. And when it comes to something like mining, this should be a no-brainer.

December 11, 2018 – Environmentalists and critics accused Premier Doug Ford of breaking his promise to protect the Greenbelt, claiming that the changes introduced in Bill 66 undermined environmental protections and opened the area to development.

Yet, here comes Doug Ford, ready to defy common sense and try to limit consultation once again. This isn’t the first time he’s taken this approach, and it seems like another case of lessons not learned. It’s as if he’s trying to sneak this by, testing the waters to see how far he can push things.

Considering that less than half of Ontario’s voters bothered to cast a ballot, it might seem like Ford reads the 55% who didn’t vote as a kind of silent approval. But relying on voter apathy or disengagement is risky business. Silence doesn’t equal consent, especially when it comes to respecting the rights and voices of Indigenous communities.

Tuesday November 28, 2023 – The Ontario Liberal Party is set to announce its new leader, facing the challenge of overcoming voter apathy and past election setbacks to compete against Doug Ford in future elections.

In today’s animated editorial cartoon, which Substack subscribers get to preview before it hits the Hamilton Spectator, I’m being upfront about a new technique I’ve started using: AI for adding voice to the characters.

According to YouTube’s policy, it’s essential to disclose when content is altered or synthetic, especially if it seems real. This includes realistic sounds or visuals created with AI. With today’s technology, the line between real and fake is increasingly blurred, and AI-generated voices are impressively accurate.

One of my critiques of animated satire has always been the voiceovers for political figures. While some might be as skilled as David Levine at caricaturing, they often fall short of Rich Little when it comes to voice impressions. Now, with AI, replicating political voices is not only easy but also a bit unsettling.

In the animated clip below, I’ve used software to mimic the voice of Doug Ford. I believe it’s clear that it’s not really him, but for those who might be too convinced, there’s a disclaimer in place.

This is uncharted territory, and I’d love to hear your thoughts. If you have any feedback or want to start a conversation, now’s your chance.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. Please Enjoy the animated making of my May 29, 2025 editorial cartoon below and thank you for your continued support!