criticism

Tuesday March 25, 2025

Danielle Smith's alignment with Trump complicates Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's campaign as he seeks to distance the party from divisive politics while facing criticism over perceived weaknesses.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday March 25, 2025

Playing the Trump Card: A Conservative Gamble

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's meeting with Donald Trump, highlighted by Kevin O'Leary's theatrical presence and ambitions, underscores the complex dynamics and urgent need for a unified Canadian strategy in light of impending U.S. tariffs.

January 13, 2025

The first week of the 2025 federal election has been anything but smooth for the Conservative Party, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s recent actions and comments have cast an unwelcome spotlight on the party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre. Her controversial request to the Trump administration to pause tariffs until after the Canadian election has not only raised eyebrows but has also thrown a wrench into the Conservatives’ campaign strategy.

News: Danielle Smith tells U.S. podcast she asked Trump administration to pause tariffs to bolster Conservatives

Alberta must balance its oil interests with national unity, aligning with other provinces to strengthen Canada's position against potential U.S. tariffs.

January 17, 2025

Smith’s actions, perceived by many as an invitation for foreign interference in Canadian politics, have drawn widespread criticism. Her alignment with Donald Trump, underscored by her visit to Mar-a-Lago and attendance at Trump’s inauguration, plays the “Trump card,” bending the narrative of her loyalty and fuelling concerns about a lack of commitment to Canadian interests. In a time when unity and a cohesive national strategy are paramount, Smith’s independent approach undermines the collective “Team Canada” stance that both provincial and federal leaders strive to present.

Opinion: Canada, May I Introduce You to Ukraine?

Canada's snap election offers a pivotal opportunity for voters to decide the nation's direction amid economic and geopolitical challenges.

March 21, 2025

Trump’s penchant for describing perceived weakness as not “holding the cards” is particularly relevant here. By aligning with Trump, Smith may inadvertently align with this narrative of vulnerability, casting doubts on her and Poilievre’s ability to lead with strength and independence. This association could paint the Conservatives as lacking the strategic “cards” needed to effectively govern and protect Canadian interests.

For Pierre Poilievre, this association with Trump-like politics is a significant hurdle. As he attempts to broaden his appeal to a diverse electorate, Smith’s comments and actions risk reinforcing a narrative that ties him closely to Trump—a narrative that could alienate moderate and swing voters who are wary of such connections. Poilievre’s reluctance to distance himself from Smith’s remarks only complicates his efforts to rebrand the Conservative Party and distance it from the divisive politics of the past.

Opinion: Danielle Smith’s Trump talk threatens Pierre Poilievre’s chances to win

Pierre Poilievre faces challenges adapting his strategy against the fresh leadership of Mark Carney, as Canada's political dynamics shift from opposition to unity.

March 15, 2025

Liberal Leader Mark Carney has capitalized on this situation, emphasizing the need for a unified government that stands firm for Canada. This contrast between Carney’s vision and the discord within the Conservative ranks could prove pivotal in swaying undecided voters. The controversy surrounding Smith provides the Liberals with a powerful narrative to question the Conservatives’ commitment to Canadian sovereignty and unity.

As the election progresses, the Conservatives face the daunting task of addressing these challenges head-on. Poilievre must navigate the delicate balance of retaining support from his conservative base while reaching out to a broader audience. He needs to clearly articulate his vision for Canada, one that resonates with voters seeking stability and leadership untainted by foreign influence.

Pierre Poilievre's backing of Alberta's controversial transgender policies seems more about playing to social conservatives than considering the potential harm to vulnerable youth.

February 9, 2024

The first week of the 2025 federal election has not gone as planned for the Conservatives. Danielle Smith’s missteps have cast a long shadow, complicating Pierre Poilievre’s path to victory. As the campaign unfolds, the Conservatives must work tirelessly to overcome this narrative and present a united front that truly reflects Canadian values and priorities. Whether they can successfully pivot from this challenging start remains to be seen, but the stakes have never been higher.

A Trump Card Gag

More than a decade has passed since Donald Trump took that infamous elevator ride, launching himself into the arena of politics. In all those years, amidst the countless headlines, debates, and controversies, I’ve managed to avoid the temptation of making a “Trump card” gag—until now. The alignment of Danielle Smith with Trump has created the first major gaffe of the Canadian election campaign, sparking controversy and certainly causing some behind-the-scenes fury between Smith and Pierre Poilievre. Her comments have undoubtedly complicated his efforts to steer the Conservative Party away from divisive politics – as in a reputation. Of being a Timbit Trump leading a Maple MAGA cult. It seems that, whether in politics or wordplay, timing is everything, and this particular moment has finally provided the perfect scenario for this metaphor.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

 

 

Wednesday March 14, 2018

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday March 14, 2018

Rex Tillerson just got brutally dumped from the White House

January 17, 2018

For the last several months, there have been rumors that President Trump was displeased with his Secretary of State and that he wanted to replace him with CIA Director Mike Pompeo. The White House has repeatedly denied that such a shakeup was in the offing, and Tillerson has repeatedly said that he doesn’t want to leave his job. But on Tuesday morning, Trump tweeted it out.

There is a lot going on here. Tillerson and Trump have never exactly jibed. The two have clashed over the Paris Climate Accords, North Korea, and the decision to move the United States’s embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Most recently, Tillerson raised eyebrows by laying the blame on Russia for the poisoning of the double agent Sergei Skripal—something that Sarah Huckabee Sanders wouldn’t do.

August 12, 2017

All of that may be secondary to the fact that Trump has never quite gotten over being called a “fucking moron” by his secretary of state. Tillerson was caught unawares, with the State Department saying he “had every intention of staying. … The Secretary did not speak to the President and is unaware of the reason.”

Tillerson’s tenure was a disaster, marked by a historic gutting of his department, conflicts with the president that increasingly left him outside of major policy decisions, and a seeming hatred for the job. But perhaps Tillerson’s main problem was that he tried to act like a diplomat in an administration that hates diplomacy.

For those who are concerned about Trump’s erratic temperament, Pompeo and Haspel are alarming choices. Pompeo sees the War on Terror as a clash of civilizations and is a hawk when it comes to Iran. Haspel, meanwhile, played a “direct role” in the CIA’s extraordinary rendition program. With weeks to go before negotiations with North Korea supposedly start, Trump’s national security team just got a lot more hawkish. (Source: New Republic) 

UPDATE: Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Wednesday March 26, 2025

Trump's cabinet is characterized by loyalty-driven appointments, where fealty often overshadows expertise, raising concerns about governance integrity.

March 26, 2025

Trump’s cabinet is characterized by loyalty-driven appointments, where fealty often overshadows expertise, raising concerns about governance integrity.

The Dynamics of Loyalty and Flattery in Trump’s Cabinet

In the political landscape shaped by Donald Trump, the dynamics of loyalty and sycophancy have played a defining role in his administration’s composition and functioning. Trump’s cabinet has been noted for its members’ pronounced loyalty and willingness to echo his policies and rhetoric, often prioritizing allegiance over expertise.

Many of Trump’s appointees and advisors were handpicked not only for their qualifications but also for their unwavering support and public praise of his leadership style. This environment fostered a culture where flattery and alignment with Trump’s views were seen as essential for maintaining favor and position within the administration.

Critics have argued that this dynamic led to a lack of critical debate and dissent, with cabinet meetings often resembling orchestrated sessions of praise. Notable instances include early cabinet meetings where members took turns lauding Trump’s accomplishments and leadership. This ritualized flattery mirrored gatherings hosted by Trump’s former lawyer, Roy Cohn, though with a more obligatory tone.

The emphasis on loyalty over expertise also contributed to frequent turnover within the cabinet. Those who failed to demonstrate sufficient allegiance or who challenged Trump’s views often found themselves replaced. This approach has raised concerns about the implications for governance and policy, with critics from both sides of the political spectrum expressing alarm over the potential erosion of institutional integrity.

As Trump continues to influence American politics, the legacy of his cabinet’s dynamics offers a cautionary tale about the balance between loyalty and independent counsel in the corridors of power.

For further insights, you can explore sources such as The New York Times, Washington Post, and Politico, which have extensively covered these aspects of Trump’s administration.

This cartoon has been re-purposed from a version that was originally published March 14, 2018

 

Wednesday August 5, 2015

Editorial cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator - Wednesday August 5, 2015 Kathleen Wynne urges voters to turf Harper government Voters should turf Prime Minister Stephen Harper for showing Ontario Òblatant disrespect,Ó Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne urged Sunday in one of her strongest attacks yet on the federal Conservatives. Wynne accused the Harper administration of naked partisanship over refusals to smooth a path for her Ontario Retirement Pension Plan and for not doing more to help develop the rich Ring of Fire mineral deposit in northwestern Ontario. She zeroed in on the pension plan, noting HarperÕs government allows the Canada Revenue Agency to provide services to provincial pension plans in Quebec and Saskatchewan. ÒFor him to then turn around and say, ÔYeah, well, we have agreement with other provinces through the CRA and weÕre not going to do that for youÕ É itÕs blatant disrespect for the people of Ontario,Ó Wynne said. ÒThat has to stop.Ó The federal government has joined business groups like the Canadian Federation of Independent Business and the Ontario Chamber of Commerce in saying the premiums that employers would have to pay under WynneÕs pension plan would put jobs in peril. ÒNo matter what the prime minister thinks about the ORPP, he may not be worried about people in Ontario who are anxious about their retirement, but I am,Ó Wynne said. Her push for enhancements to the Canada Pension Plan to boost retirement incomes was brushed aside by Ottawa, prompting her to launch the Ontario plan in 2017. The province wants the CRA to do back-office administration for the pension plan, cutting down on costs and unnecessary duplication. (Source: Toronto Star) http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/08/02/kathleen-wynne-urges-voters-to-turf-harper-government.html Ontario, Canada, Kathleen Wynne, Justin Trudeau, Stephen Harper, fire, attack, election 2015, campaign, criticism, diplomacy

Editorial cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday August 5, 2015

Kathleen Wynne urges voters to turf Harper government

Voters should turf Prime Minister Stephen Harper for showing Ontario “blatant disrespect,” Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne urged Sunday in one of her strongest attacks yet on the federal Conservatives.

Thursday January 22, 2015Wynne accused the Harper administration of naked partisanship over refusals to smooth a path for her Ontario Retirement Pension Plan and for not doing more to help develop the rich Ring of Fire mineral deposit in northwestern Ontario.

She zeroed in on the pension plan, noting Harper’s government allows the Canada Revenue Agency to provide services to provincial pension plans in Quebec and Saskatchewan.

Tuesday November 25, 2014“For him to then turn around and say, ‘Yeah, well, we have agreement with other provinces through the CRA and we’re not going to do that for you’ … it’s blatant disrespect for the people of Ontario,” Wynne said. “That has to stop.”

The federal government has joined business groups like the Canadian Federation of Independent Business and the Ontario Chamber of Commerce in saying the premiums that employers would have to pay under Wynne’s pension plan would put jobs in peril.

Wednesday February 15, 2005“No matter what the prime minister thinks about the ORPP, he may not be worried about people in Ontario who are anxious about their retirement, but I am,” Wynne said.

Her push for enhancements to the Canada Pension Plan to boost retirement incomes was brushed aside by Ottawa, prompting her to launch the Ontario plan in 2017. The province wants the CRA to do back-office administration for the pension plan, cutting down on costs and unnecessary duplication. (Source: Toronto Star)