dinosaur

Wednesday January 17, 2024

The GOP primary unfolds like a prehistoric drama, with Trump dominating as Trumposaurus Rex, and rivals like Haley and DeSantis navigating electability, competency, and the Jan. 6 attack as the circus moves to New Hampshire.

January 17, 2024

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday January 17, 2024

Trump’s Dominance and the GOP Primary Circus

May 11, 2023

As the Iowa Caucus unfolded, the Republican primary race resembled a prehistoric spectacle with all four main candidates playing the roles of dinosaurs, each representing a different facet of conservative beliefs. However, looming over them all was the seemingly unbeatable Trumposaurus Rex – the defeated, impeached, indicted, and generally disgraced former President Donald Trump.

The challengers to Trump were portrayed as Trump sycophants, each with their own distinct dinosaur identities. Nikki Haley, dubbed Hayleydonasaurus, and Ron DeSantis, known as Desantodonasaurus, were like two dinosaur upper bodies sharing the same set of legs, attempting to punch each other out in a series of debates that always lacked the presence of the polls leader, Donald Trump.

Vivek Ramaswamy, the biggest Trump sycophant of them all, fittingly earned the title of Ramawamysychophantic Trumposaurus Rex, finishing in last place and promptly suspending his campaign before throwing his support behind Trump.

News: Iowa caucus results: The GOP presidential field narrows as Ramaswamy and Hutchinson drop out

May 26, 2023

Former President Donald Trump has undeniably dominated the Republican primary race for months, with his rivals hesitant to criticize him directly, fearing a backlash from base Republican voters. The primary contenders, including Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis, have largely relied on indirect attacks to navigate the tricky terrain of the GOP base.

The issue of electability emerged as a focal point in the candidates’ strategies, with DeSantis openly expressing doubts about Trump’s ability to win and emphasizing the need for a candidate who can appeal to a broader voter base. Haley also joined the electability argument, citing polls that showed her performing better against Biden than either Trump or DeSantis.

Competency became a battleground, with Haley questioning Trump’s ability to lead in a second term, criticizing his chaotic approach, and challenging his economic policies. DeSantis accused Trump of contributing to rising inflation and criticized him for failing to complete the U.S.-Mexico border wall.

In a departure from the Trump narrative, former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie labeled Trump as unfit for the presidency, citing concerns about using the Department of Justice against political enemies. Meanwhile, political newcomer Vivek Ramaswamy staunchly defended Trump, hailing him as the “best president of the 21st century.”

January 8, 2021

The Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol revealed divisions among the candidates, with Haley and DeSantis offering nuanced perspectives. While Trump downplayed the violence, Haley broke with him, calling it a terrible day and blaming him for not preventing or stopping it. DeSantis labeled it a riot and accused Democrats and the media of smearing Trump supporters.

The question of whether Trump should be pardoned in the face of criminal charges became a litmus test for the candidates. While Haley and DeSantis expressed willingness to pardon Trump if convicted, Christie stood firm against it, emphasizing the importance of accepting responsibility.

The issue of Trump being disqualified from primary ballots in states like Colorado and Maine led to a united front among the Republican candidates, defending his right to run for president.

As the GOP circus moves from Iowa to New Hampshire, Trump’s commanding win provides him with unprecedented momentum. Anti-Trump Republicans in New Hampshire see it as a chance to slow him down, but the gap between Trump and his rivals, especially Nikki Haley, remains significant.

The GOP primary race continues to be dominated by Trumposaurus Rex, with the other candidates playing various dinosaur roles in a political spectacle that mirrors a prehistoric drama. The next stop in New Hampshire promises further twists and turns in this intriguing political saga. (AI)

 

Wednesday August 9, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday August 9, 2023

Trudeau’s Woes and Poilievre’s Predicament

July 26, 2023

As the Canadian political landscape shifts, the contrasting misfortunes of Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre paint a vivid picture of leadership challenges that span both sides of the spectrum. Trudeau, once hailed as a charismatic leader with a golden touch, now finds himself grappling with a litany of crises, while Poilievre, seeking a makeover, struggles to define his party’s identity without veering into right-wing extremism.

Trudeau’s woes are as glaring as they are diverse. From sagging poll numbers to economic mismanagement, the prime minister’s once-unshakable approval ratings have plummeted to historic lows. His handling of the homelessness crisis and perceived ethical lapses have left many Canadians disillusioned. As he passes the buck to other layers of government, Trudeau’s inability to address issues like rising inflation and exorbitant housing prices has fueled the desire for a fresh government, with only a paltry 19% favoring him in a recent poll.

The Beaverton: Canadians react to Pierre Poilievre’s “sexy” makeover  

July 28, 2023

Trudeau’s attempt to reinvigorate his image through a cabinet shuffle seems to have fallen flat, failing to provide the much-needed positive narrative that could rekindle support. The prospect of an inquiry into alleged Chinese government interference in the last election looms ominously, adding to the list of his troubles. The prime minister’s recent personal turmoil, as he announced his separation from his wife of 18 years, Sophie Grégoire Trudeau, adds yet another layer of complexity to his already embattled leadership.

On the other side of the aisle, Pierre Poilievre faces an equally uphill battle. Attempting a pivot from his long-held reputation as a sharp-elbowed partisan, Poilievre’s makeover involves donning a new look, complete with a wardrobe change and the conspicuous absence of his trademark glasses. However, his attempts to widen his appeal are hindered by his party’s historical ties to right-wing extremism and social conservatism, which risk alienating a broader swath of the Canadian electorate.

July 22, 2023

Poilievre’s attempts to resonate with voters have led him to navigate treacherous waters. Cozying up to the far-right and flirting with controversial figures like Jordan Peterson and European right-wing politicians sends mixed signals about the Conservative Party’s true direction. While rallying the base with catchy slogans, he’s challenged to strike a balance between appeasing his core supporters and presenting a more moderate and electable platform.

The challenge for both leaders is clear: appealing to a diverse electorate while grappling with their own vulnerabilities. Trudeau’s pursuit of a fourth consecutive term faces mounting resistance, as he struggles to reconcile past accomplishments with current crises. Poilievre, meanwhile, aims to rebrand himself and his party, but the fine line between change and extremism threatens to undermine his efforts.

News: Over half of Canadians want Trudeau, Poilievre replaced as party leaders before next election, poll suggests  

June 10, 2023

As Trudeau’s golden touch fades and Poilievre grapples with his party’s identity crisis, Canadians are left with a political landscape where neither leader is without fault. The electorate watches closely as these two titans navigate their respective challenges, revealing that leadership in a deeply divided nation requires more than mere promises or wardrobe adjustments. It necessitates a clear, balanced vision that addresses the concerns of all Canadians and reflects the realities of a changing world. (AI)

 

Thursday May 4, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 4, 2023

Why Flying the Pride Flag Matters

January 17, 2012

Recently, a disturbing incident occurred outside a meeting of the York Catholic District School Board. Adults who claimed to be protecting Ontario’s children were actually endangering their well-being. Many of these adults, likely parents of school-aged children, showed up to the meeting to vehemently oppose the possibility of the board flying the rainbow flag in support of LGBTQ students in June. They even hurled insults at those who were in favour of flying the flag. 

News: Advocates, protestors clash at York Catholic school board meeting over flying Pride flag  

Although some of these adults claim that their objection was not specifically to the Pride flag but to what they believe it represents – the alleged corruption of children who are supposedly too young to learn about gender and sexuality – this notion is misguided. Everyone is capable of learning about gay, transgender, and non-binary people, just as they can learn about cisgender and heterosexual people. Queer people are not sexually explicit by their mere existence.

The belief that exposing children to queer people is harmful is nonsensical and is based on hateful, age-old myths about queer people as a corrupting influence on children. This belief is also derived from a particular brand of anti-LGBTQ politics typically associated with the United States. However, the events at the Catholic school board in York Region demonstrate that Canada is not immune to public displays of hateful rhetoric.

Pride celebrations are essential in schools to support marginalized kids who need it. Flying the Pride flag is not merely an act of virtue signalling; it is an official declaration of support for these kids. According to a recent survey conducted by the LGBTQ advocacy group EGALE, anti-queer discrimination is still prevalent in Canadian schools. For instance, 64% of all participants reported hearing homophobic comments daily or weekly at school. Moreover, 79% of transgender students who experienced physical harassment reported that teachers and staff were ineffective in addressing transphobic harassment. Lastly, over 30% of respondents who attend Catholic schools reported experiencing harassment based on their perceived sexual orientation.

October 30, 2018

We have made significant progress as a society regarding inclusion, but there is still much work to be done. It is critical that schools fly the Pride flag to signal to kids that even if their peers or parents reject them because of their identity, the school itself – and those at its helm – do not. Education Minister Stephen Lecce made it clear that he supports LGBTQ students, and we hope that York Region’s Catholic school board will follow suit. (AI)

 

Friday August 20, 2021

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday August 20, 2021

Not the Bad Guys Anymore

When the Taliban first sacked Kabul 25 years ago, the group declared that it was not out for revenge, instead offering amnesty to anyone who had worked for the former government. “Taliban will not take revenge,” a Taliban commander said then. “We have no personal rancor.” At the time of that promise, the ousted president, Mohammad Najibullah, was unavailable for comment. The Taliban had castrated him and, according to some reports, stuffed his severed genitals in his mouth, and soon after, he was strung up from a lamppost.

November 14, 2001

The reports from Kabul are probably more reassuring to those unfamiliar with this history. The Taliban has once again declared a general amnesty, and asked everyone to show up for work in the morning and prepare to unite behind a Taliban government that will rule according to Islamic law—but perhaps, the group has suggested, not in the harsh manner that made it infamous during its rule from 1996 to 2001. Women can continue their education so long as they wear the hijab, and the Taliban will guarantee human rights and freedoms of speech and expression, it said, so long as they comply with sharia. (Spoiler: The Taliban does not believe they do.) A Taliban spokesperson consented to an interview with a female television presenter whose face was visible. During the Taliban’s previous regime, it discouraged depiction of the human form, and would certainly not have countenanced the broadcast of a woman’s face to the entire world.

The Taliban now owns Afghanistan, and its first priority is avoiding anything that resembles chaos. In 1996, the group’s leader, Mullah Omar, told residents of Kabul to resist the temptation to flee, that the Taliban would keep them safe. Omar died in 2013, but his successors—who include his own son, the Taliban’s top military official—are saying exactly the same thing now. They have made sure the police phone number works, and they are calling for workers, including cops formerly loyal to the previous government, to report for duty. The Afghans I have reached by phone in Kabul say the same: Taliban are in the streets, acting not as avengers but as guarantors of public order. They are not executing people on street corners; instead they’re watching for looters and troublemakers. (The Taliban has always returned to this core role, since the movement’s founding: In the 1990s, when the Afghan countryside was beset by highwaymen, murderers, and rapists, the group won its first followers by securing the roads and providing order where the worst kind of anarchy had reigned.) (Continued: The Atlantic) 

August 17, 2021

Meanwhile, in Canada, there may be no better example of the unique and difficult challenge Erin O’Toole faces as leader of the federal Conservative Party than his recently announced policy on mandatory vaccinations.

Mr. O’Toole is against measures that force Canadians to get vaccinated, regardless of what line of work they may be in. Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has said federal workers must be vaccinated, as well as anyone who wants to fly or travel by train.

The Conservative Leader says he believes in the power and safety of vaccines, but doesn’t feel people should be forced to take them. Mr. Trudeau doesn’t believe people should be forced to take them either, but nor should the unvaccinated have the right to potentially pass COVID-19 on to others. Thus, the mandate.

July 15, 2021

A majority of Canadians are fully or partially vaccinated. And most of them, polls suggest, support vaccine mandates or vaccine passports that bestow certain rights and privileges on those who have chosen to get jabbed. In his heart, I think Mr. O’Toole believes this also. He just can’t endorse that policy because it would alienate a faction of his base – the libertarians and vaccine deniers – who think the state has no right imposing restrictive measures on anyone. These are voters Maxime Bernier and his People’s Party of Canada are trying to steal away from the Conservatives.

Welcome to Erin O’Toole’s world – or rather, his nightmare. While his central challenger in this election, Justin Trudeau, can be many things to many people, the Conservative Leader does not have that option. He is bound, in many ways, to a segment of the population resistant to change and who are suspicious of government intrusions of any sort into their lives, regardless of the reason. (Continued: Globe & Mail)

L E T T E R S  to the  E D I T O R  The Hamilton Spectator, Saturday August 21, 2021

Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, August 23, 2021

Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, August 24, 2021

Social Media chatter:



 

Tuesday March 23, 2021

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday March 23, 2021

O’Toole’s pitch to get Conservatives to embrace ‘change’ may be off to a shaky start

Erin O’Toole told Conservatives this weekend that their party must change — because if it doesn’t, he said, it won’t be able to win the votes necessary to defeat Justin Trudeau’s Liberals in the next election.

May 2, 2019

And if the Liberals do win, he added, they’ll be able to implement their own changes — changes that O’Toole cast as frightening and potentially ruinous.

But O’Toole didn’t tell Conservatives exactly how they need to change. And then delegates delivered a potentially damaging vote on climate change policy that suggests his party base might not be ready to move very far.

O’Toole is on solid ground when he says the Conservative Party needs to try something different. His own polling numbers make that obvious. But so did the last federal election.

In 2019, Andrew Scheer’s Conservatives ran on an implicit promise to return to the policy agenda of Stephen Harper’s government. Scheer promised to smile more than his predecessor did but stopped short of offering a new approach — particularly on climate change.

June 23, 2020

The Conservatives won 34 per cent of the popular vote in that election. That was two points better than the party’s performance under Harper in 2015, but its national result in 2019 was inflated by the massive Conservative turnout in Alberta and Saskatchewan. In Ontario and Quebec — where 199 of the country’s 338 ridings are located — the Conservatives actually lost ground under Scheer.

A year and a half later, O’Toole’s Conservatives are sitting at 30 per cent nationally. And O’Toole’s personal approval rating might be even more of a problem.

August 25, 2020

According to survey results released by Abacus Data last week, 23 per cent of Canadians are committed to voting Conservative in the next election and another 23 per cent would consider voting Conservative.

But as the Abacus numbers point out, the differences between those two groups are substantial. Compared to those who have decided already to vote for O’Toole’s party, those potential Conservative voters are younger, more diverse, much more concerned about climate change and much less angry about Justin Trudeau.

September 1, 2020

O’Toole said his party must have a “serious” and “comprehensive” plan for climate change. But he doubled down on his criticism of the current federal carbon price and fell back on a framing that casts “the environment” as a discrete issue — as opposed to a broader view that sees climate policy as intertwined with almost all other areas of public policy.

“As important as climate change is, getting our economy back on track is more important,” he said.

In his prepared remarks, he said he wanted to defeat the “lie” that the Conservative Party is a party of “climate change deniers.” On Friday night and then again during a question-and-answer session with party members on Saturday afternoon, O’Toole declared that the “debate” over climate change is over.

But in between those two pronouncements came the news that Conservative delegates had rejected a resolution that would have declared that “climate change is real” and “the Conservative party is willing to act” — while committing the party to targeting high emitters and supporting innovation.

The headlines generated by that vote might be a serious setback to O’Toole’s goal of rebranding his party. Liberals will no doubt be happy to remind him of that vote at every opportunity in the weeks and months ahead. (CBC)

Sketch of being pulled back from the big kids’ pool