Easter – mackaycartoons

Tricks, Treats, and the Quest for Clarity

April 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Saturday April 19, 2025 | Newsletter 27

From the last seven days, we explore the illusions cast by political figures in their campaigns, the looming influence of external forces, and the urgent call for transparency as the election approaches.

Monday April 14, 2025 | Rerun of the week: PP’s Whack-a-mole (From Saturday May 4, 2024)

In a rerun from almost a year ago, we critique Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s proposal to use the notwithstanding clause, which allows governments to override Charter-protected rights. The cartoon highlights risks to judicial independence and public trust, especially as Poilievre aims to bypass a Supreme Court ruling on life sentences without parole. Recently revisiting this idea raises fresh concerns, especially with parallels to Trump’s influence in the U.S. By signalling a willingness to sidestep court decisions, Poilievre risks losing support from voters who value judicial checks and balances. A more nuanced approach could help him respect judicial independence while advocating for his policies.

Tuesday April 15, 2025 | The Illusionists’ Show

In Canada’s 2025 election, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre act as political magicians. Carney’s temporary tax break and Poilievre’s climate denial, represented by a gorilla, are tricks that vanish once the election ends. Poilievre’s lack of a climate plan puts him behind, while Carney is ready to lead the conversation on sustainability. True leadership must tackle real issues once the illusions fade.
Youtube: Master illusionists of Environmental Policies

Wednesday April 16, 2025 | Tariffs, Turmoil and Thrones

Ontario’s chamber is the stage. Lieutenant Governor Edith Dumont delivers the Speech from the Throne. Premier Doug Ford sits on her left, frowning and saying, “Ontario is not for sale!”—a jab at U.S. President Donald Trump, who grins on the right, loving the regal vibe. While Trump revels in the theatrics, Ford faces the challenge of dealing with tariffs and local issues. This scene highlights Ford’s effort to stand firm against Trump’s king-like charm.
Youtube: Shopping For Thrones

Thursday April 17, 2025 | Trump’s Influence in Canada’s Leaders’ Debate

In the debate spectacle, the caption “Knockout Punch” captures viewers’ anticipation for dramatic moments, much like race car crashes or hockey fights, and takes on a double meaning with Karoline Leavitt’s involvement. Her attractive and confident exterior contrasts sharply with her contentious role as a spokesperson, where she frequently berates reporters and spreads misinformation, echoing Trump’s rhetoric instead of effectively bridging the U.S. executive branch and the media. At her White House podium she boldly asserts that Canadians would benefit from becoming the 51st state, eliciting concerned looks from Canadian leaders and humorously critiquing U.S. influence on Canada. This statement highlights the underlying, ever-present threat of annexation, a not so funny reality, which looms over the election and remains a significant issue for the foreseeable future, overshadowing domestic debate points.
Youtube: Trump in the Debate

Friday April 18, 2025 | Unpublished Bunny Cartoon

As the 2025 Canadian election hops closer, our “Parliamentary Budget Bunny” lounges majestically on a throne, offering a whimsical critique of political antics. “COSTED PLATFORMS ANYONE?” it quips, highlighting the glaring absence of fiscal transparency from major parties like the Liberals and Conservatives. In a week shortened by Good Friday, this Easter-themed cartoon was edged out in the battle of the bunnies, yet it captures the relaxed approach to political accountability. While the Greens have hopped ahead with their costed platform, it’s more of a participation ribbon given their poll standings. Some voters are left pondering—where will the cuts land as trade tariffs bite, and promises of tax cuts float unanchored by fiscal plans? Deny it at your peril, but austerity is coming, much like the UK’s unforeseen cuts after Labour was given a majority less than a year ago. With election day just a hare’s breath away, let’s demand clarity and brace for the time when fiscal reality takes centre stage, whether we like it or not.

Saturday April 19, 2025 | Poilievre’s Notwithstanding Gamble

Shining a light on Pierre Poilievre’s contentious plan to use the notwithstanding clause, while drawing parallels to Trump’s judicial overreach. Yeah, I went there. Poilievre’s proposal to enforce tougher sentencing for multiple murderers taps into populist outrage but raises alarm bells about the potential erosion of judicial independence. Critics warn that using this powerful clause at the federal level could open a Pandora’s box, leading to a slippery slope where individual liberties are at risk. As Poilievre embraces a Trump-like approach, the question looms: what other rights might he sideline next? With the election on the horizon, this cartoon serves as a timely reminder of the dangers of authoritarian overreach cloaked in populist rhetoric.
YouTube: Easter Bunny Rejection

This week’s dive into Canadian politics shows us that while tricks and theatrics can be entertaining, voters are looking for honesty and clarity. With debates now in the history books, we embark on the final gasps of the 2025 federal election. The conclusion of a turbulent five months in Canadian politics blends this week with Day 100 of the reign of Donald Trump. April 28 will bring clarity to the course Canada will take in the months and years to come.

Thank you to everyone who continues to subscribe to this weekly newsletter! I typically release posts every Saturday morning, offering a summary of the week through my editorial cartoons. My aim is to keep you informed without overwhelming you with constant notifications. Throughout the week, I also share daily ‘notes’ on my Substack, which enrich my weekly newsletters and feature animated versions of my daily cartoons.

Please Subscribe. It’s free!

Youtube: Animated Week in Review: April 14-19, 2025

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will always be free. Thank you for your continued support!

Saturday April 19, 2025

April 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 19, 2025

Poilievre’s Notwithstanding Gamble: A Risky Precedent for Canada

May 4, 2024

In a political landscape increasingly characterized by divisive rhetoric and the erosion of democratic norms, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s pledge to invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a troubling signal. His proposal to use this powerful constitutional tool to impose consecutive life sentences for multiple murderers may tap into populist sentiments, but it sets a dangerous precedent that should disqualify him and his party from gaining the reins of power.

December 14, 2022

The notwithstanding clause, or Section 33 of the Charter, allows federal and provincial governments to override certain Charter rights temporarily. Traditionally, its use has been confined to provincial matters, such as Quebec’s secularism laws, where it has already sparked controversy. No Canadian Prime Minister has ever used this clause at the federal level, and for good reason. It represents an extraordinary measure intended for exceptional circumstances, not a tool for advancing populist agendas.

December 6, 2022

Poilievre’s willingness to be the first Prime Minister to wield this clause reflects a concerning alignment with tactics seen south of the border under Donald Trump. Trump’s efforts to undermine the judiciary and politicize the courts have led to a weakening of the checks and balances that are foundational to American democracy. Canadians should be wary of similar trends taking root here.

News: Poilievre’s pledge to use notwithstanding clause a ‘dangerous sign’: legal expert

Critics, including legal experts and political leaders, have voiced strong opposition to Poilievre’s plan. They warn that normalizing the use of the notwithstanding clause for routine legislative purposes could erode the Charter’s protections and lead to further politicization of fundamental rights. This slippery slope could extend beyond criminal justice, potentially threatening academic freedom, reproductive rights, and other areas where individual liberties might clash with political agendas.

March 15, 2025

Public sentiment, as reflected in reader comments and broader discourse, reveals deep apprehension about Poilievre’s intentions. The use of the notwithstanding clause is seen not only as an overreach but also as an indication of Poilievre’s authoritarian tendencies—a “trumpy” approach that prioritizes personal opinion over established legal norms. Such a path risks alienating those who value the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

News: Poilievre says he’ll use notwithstanding clause to ensure multiple-murderers die in prison

November 9 2024

Poilievre’s tough-on-crime rhetoric may resonate with certain voter bases, but the implications of his proposals extend far beyond immediate policy goals. They strike at the heart of Canada’s democratic values and the delicate balance of power that protects citizens’ rights. As we approach the upcoming election, it is crucial for Canadians to consider the long-term consequences of granting power to a leader willing to circumvent the Charter for political gain.

In a time when global democratic institutions face unprecedented challenges, Canada must stand firm in upholding its principles. Poilievre’s promise to invoke the notwithstanding clause is a stark reminder of the stakes at play. It is a promise that, if fulfilled, could fundamentally alter the landscape of Canadian governance. For this reason, it stands as yet another compelling argument.

“Notwithstanding Clause” no doubt instantly triggers eye glazing in vast swaths of Canadians, a nation where many voters remain unaware of its implications until they feel the impact firsthand. Pierre Poilievre, echoing Trump, is using populist outrage to justify potentially overriding judicial independence with the notwithstanding clause, signalling a troubling shift towards authoritarianism. What might have been seen as fear-mongering before an election becomes irrelevant once a movement takes power. When these accusations no longer trigger instinctive reactions, they solidify into harsh realities. Just look south for proof of this. Timbit Trump’s promise to enforce life sentences by bypassing court decisions raises concerns about future threats to constitutional rights, drawing unsettling parallels with recent U.S. politics. Today, Poilievre targets criminal sentencing, but despite denying admiration for Trump, he emulates many strategies from the Trump playbook, suggesting he might next challenge academic freedom, women’s rights, or other constitutional protections. This commitment to undermining judicial independence to consolidate power is the pivotal issue of this election, as it echoes the U.S. pattern of filling the judiciary with like-minded judges and defying court rulings, reflecting a desire to centralize authority. Sure, just what democracy ordered: another leader eager to override court decisions with his own, thanks to the trusty notwithstanding clause. Vote for this at your peril.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 19, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

YouTube: Easter Bunny Rejection https://youtu.be/jDyQEaocYGc

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, Unpublished – Friday April 18, 2025

A Disservice to Canadian Voters

April 19, 2025

In the throes of an election cycle, Canadian voters find themselves navigating a landscape devoid of fully costed party platforms. As advanced polls open, the absence of detailed fiscal plans from major political players like the Liberals and Conservatives is not just a minor oversight; it’s a reckless disregard for the electorate’s right to informed decision-making.

Party platforms serve as a blueprint for governance, offering insight into priorities and fiscal strategies. They are essential for holding future governments accountable. Yet, here we are, mere weeks from casting ballots, and the fiscal blueprints remain elusive. The Conservatives have pledged to collaborate with the Parliamentary Budget Officer, while the Liberals promise a release before the advanced polls close. However, these assurances come too late in the game, leaving voters with little time to digest and debate the implications of proposed policies.

Opinion: Where are the Costed Party Platforms? The Clock is Ticking

The recklessness of this approach is underscored by the current economic climate. With Canada facing a third major economic shock in less than two decades—following the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 pandemic, and now the 2025 US trade conflict—the need for transparent and credible fiscal planning is paramount. Proposals to cut taxes or increase spending should be weighed against the backdrop of economic uncertainty and potential deficits. The lack of detailed platforms raises questions about how these promises will be funded and whether they are fiscally responsible.

Despite this, the reality may be that the absence of costed platforms doesn’t significantly sway most voters. In an age where political campaigns often resemble theatrical performances, filled with grand promises and vague assurances, the specifics of fiscal policy may take a backseat to broader ideological alignments and emotional appeals. Many voters prioritize immediate concerns over long-term fiscal sustainability, trusting party rhetoric over detailed economic assessments.

Opinion: The hidden costs of Liberal and Conservative election promises

However, this complacency is a gamble. Without clear plans, voters are left to speculate on the sincerity and feasibility of campaign promises. It allows parties to make grandiose claims without accountability for their financial implications, potentially leading to governance that prioritizes short-term gains over sustainable economic health.

While the absence of costed platforms may not deter most voters, it represents a significant dereliction of political responsibility. It denies Canadians the opportunity to engage in meaningful debate about the future direction of the country. As citizens, we must demand more from our political leaders, insisting on transparency and accountability in their fiscal promises. The stakes are too high to accept anything less.

Saturday March 30, 2024

March 30, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday March 30, 2024

The Easter Bunny’s Warning: Climate Change and the Threat of Chocolate Shortages

April 3, 2021

As we prepare for the festivities of Easter, the iconic figure of the Easter Bunny hops into our consciousness, laden with baskets filled with colourful eggs and, of course, chocolate delights. It’s a tradition cherished by many, invoking feelings of joy, anticipation, and sweet indulgence. However, behind the whimsical facade of this beloved holiday tradition lies a troubling reality: the looming threat of chocolate shortages, yet another grim indicator of the costs of climate change.

For decades, chocolate has been a staple of Easter celebrations, symbolizing abundance, happiness, and the simple pleasures of life. Yet, as we delve deeper into the intricacies of chocolate production, we uncover a narrative tainted by the harsh realities of environmental degradation and climate instability.

News: Easter eggs are more expensive this year and climate change may be a culprit

April 20, 2019

The recent surge in cocoa prices, reaching unprecedented highs, serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of our global food systems. Poor harvests in West Africa, home to the majority of the world’s cocoa production, have been exacerbated by erratic weather patterns and the spread of crop diseases. The consequences are dire: dwindling cocoa supplies, soaring production costs, and dwindling incomes for cocoa farmers.

But let us not mistake this issue as merely a matter of economics. The chocolate shortage is but a symptom of a much larger crisis: the catastrophic impact of climate change on our planet’s ecosystems and livelihoods. From the decimation of insect populations crucial for pollination to the degradation of fertile land due to deforestation and soil erosion, the fingerprints of climate change are unmistakable.

April 4, 2015

As we savour each bite of our Easter chocolate, let us pause to reflect on the profound implications of its scarcity. It is a harbinger of a future where the simple pleasures we often take for granted may become increasingly elusive. The Easter Bunny’s deliveries, once a symbol of abundance and joy, may one day be overshadowed by the spectre of scarcity and uncertainty.

But amidst this gloomy forecast, there lies a glimmer of hope—a call to action for individuals, communities, and policymakers alike. We must recognize the urgent need to address the root causes of climate change and embrace sustainable practices that safeguard the future of chocolate production and the livelihoods of cocoa farmers.

Opinion: NOT another chocolate shortage article

December 1, 2007

Furthermore, we must demand accountability from the major stakeholders in the chocolate industry, urging them to prioritize environmental stewardship, fair labour practices, and long-term sustainability over short-term profits. It is time for us to reevaluate our relationship with chocolate, not merely as a commodity to be consumed but as a symbol of our commitment to a more equitable and resilient future.

This Easter, as we revel in the delights of the season, let us heed the Easter Bunny’s silent warning—the shortage of chocolate is not just a logistical inconvenience but a sobering reminder of the urgent need for collective action to mitigate the impacts of climate change before it’s too late. (AI)

Thursday April 6, 2023

April 6, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 6, 2023

Trump: Fearless Defender, or Hollow Chocolate Easter Egg

March 22, 2023

As Easter weekend approaches, the US is facing a different kind of resurrection: the first criminal trial of a former president in history. Donald Trump, resembling a giant hollow chocolate Easter egg being cracked by Lady Justice, has pleaded not guilty to charges of falsifying business records and violating federal campaign finance law. The charges relate to a hush money payment of $130,000 made to porn star Stormy Daniels, who claims to have had an affair with Trump.

News: Trump’s Day of Martyrdom Didn’t Go Quite as He Expected

While Trump calls it a “fake case” and accuses Democrats of conspiracy to interfere with next year’s presidential election, prosecutors say it points to a pattern of suppressing potentially damaging stories. The charges, which carry a maximum of four years in prison, could prove to be a major distraction for the Republican front-runner and add a new layer of turmoil to his party’s primary.

November 10, 2022

The trial could begin as early as January 2024, just as primaries begin to select the party’s nominee for the presidential election. While a criminal conviction would not prevent Trump from either running for president or from reclaiming the Oval Office, the prolonged legal fight could prove to be a major distraction and add a new layer of turmoil to his party’s primary.

This is not the only legal battle Trump faces. He is also the focus of three other investigations, related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, the attack on the Capitol as it was certifying Joe Biden’s victory, and over the former president’s handling of classified documents after leaving the White House. As the legal battles continue to loom over him, Trump may claim he’s “fearlessly defending our nation”, but many are concerned that the country seems to be going to hell, as he once put it.

News: Trump remains the most popular Republican despite his indictment

July 23, 2022

Despite the charges against him, Trump remains a divisive figure in American politics, with a strong base of supporters who are fiercely loyal to him. However, the case against him has pulled the country into uncharted political territory, and many are watching to see how it will play out in the coming months and years.

As we approach the Easter weekend, a time of reflection and renewal, it seems fitting to consider the potential impact of this trial on the country’s political landscape. Will it bring about a renewed sense of justice and accountability, or will it deepen the divisions that have already fractured the nation? Only time will tell, but one thing is certain: the coming months are sure to be filled with uncertainty, as the US grapples with the aftermath of the Trump presidency and looks towards the future. (AI)