foreign interference

Friday June 2, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 2, 2023

Inaction Plagues Canada’s Security System Despite Johnston Report

May 9, 2023

The Johnston report, investigating foreign interference and the government’s response, has failed to spur meaningful efforts to address Canada’s security and intelligence communication system. The reactions to the report reflect the fractured state of Canadian politics rather than a focus on its findings. This article argues that the lack of visible action in the face of the national security threat posed by foreign interference is concerning.

Mistrust of the government, fueled by responses to COVID-19 measures and protests, has tainted the discourse. Legitimate concerns about foreign interference have been overshadowed by baseless suspicions of compromised elections. Instead of tackling core issues, there is a preoccupation with scandal and scapegoats.

Analysis: What would it take for Canada to have a ‘serious’ debate about foreign interference?  

March 26, 2013

Johnston’s analysis, based on classified intelligence, discounts political misconduct allegations and questions media reporting on leaked documents. Unfortunately, the focus on sensationalism hinders progress and ignores his valuable insights.

Two dangers emerge from this inaction. Firstly, secondary battles distract from the urgent need to address foreign interference. Secondly, partisan approaches and weakened trust create vulnerabilities that authoritarian states exploit.

Johnston stresses the need for facts and truth in national security, calling for transparency and public understanding. Declassifying documents, strengthening independent review systems, and enforcing laws against foreign interference are crucial steps. Public hearings can facilitate accountability and include the voices of affected communities.

Despite the Johnston report, there is a lack of action to address Canada’s security system. It is essential to prioritize the protection of Canadian democracy from foreign interference. Moving beyond partisanship and focusing on transparency, facts, and implementing the recommendations are crucial for safeguarding national security. (AI)

The Parliament Buildings aren’t easy to draw. This clip shows how an old version I drew can be imported, altered, scaled, and replicated as a reference for the latest drawing. With the panda Wednesday night’s Nature episode served as added inspiration. Tablets make editorial cartooning so easy, the craft just needs younger recruits. Also, I’ve become aware of a growing thinking by people in the Chinese community that the dragon metaphor for China is cheesy and induces eye-rolls, even when referring to the clowns running operations in Beijing. – GM

 

 

 

Saturday May 27, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday May 27, 2023

Breaking the Alliance: A Necessary Step to Demand an Independent Public Inquiry

April 8, 2022

NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh has expressed his dedication to advocating for an impartial public inquiry into China’s interference in elections. However, the dilemma arises from his party’s alliance with the Liberals in Parliament. To exert effective pressure on the government, Singh must contemplate severing this alliance, which was initially established to support the Liberals for an additional year and a half. Given recent events and the escalating call for an inquiry, it is crucial to explore alternative avenues that guarantee transparency and accountability.

The alliance between the Liberals and NDP, known as the “supply and confidence agreement,” aimed to provide stability to the minority government. Unfortunately, it has allowed the Liberals to dismiss the voice of Parliament. Despite a majority vote of 172-149 in favor of an independent public inquiry, the Liberals have chosen to disregard it, relying on the NDP’s commitment to support them through the alliance. This situation undermines democratic principles, which require elected representatives’ voices to be heard and respected.

Globe & Mail: Mr. Singh, axe your alliance with the Liberals  

March 23, 2022

To intensify pressure on the Liberals and compel them to initiate a formal public inquiry, Jagmeet Singh should terminate the alliance. Such a move would not trigger an election but would emphasize the government’s minority mandate obtained in the 2021 election. By withdrawing their support, the NDP would demonstrate their dedication to accountability, transparency, and the restoration of Canadians’ trust in our democratic institutions.

A recent report by former governor-general David Johnston, though largely classified, emphasizes the urgent necessity of a comprehensive and independent public inquiry. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s offer to provide closed-door briefings for opposition leaders, along with access to unredacted portions of the report, falls short of satisfying this need. A public inquiry, with the power to compel testimony under oath and hold individuals accountable for their actions, is essential for a complete understanding of the events, their timeline, and the government’s response to foreign interference.

May 25, 2023

David Johnston’s recommendation for a fact-finding mission and broader hearings on foreign interference fails to address the fundamental issues at hand. While these steps are important for shaping policy improvements, they do not replace a thorough examination of what went wrong and who may bear responsibility within the government. Only a comprehensive public inquiry can provide the necessary transparency, rebuild public trust, and establish effective safeguards against future electoral interference.

All three opposition leaders, including Jagmeet Singh, continue to advocate for an independent public inquiry. Their unwavering stance aligns with the overwhelming vote in Parliament, underscoring the urgent need for a comprehensive examination of China’s meddling and the government’s response. Singh, by accepting the offer to review the complete report, reaffirmed his belief that a public inquiry is the sole means to restore trust and ensure a thorough investigation.

Clip: Poilievre calls on Singh to ‘do his job’ and force a public inquiry 

March 24, 2023

Jagmeet Singh must now demonstrate the sincerity of his commitment to transparency and accountability by taking bold action. Breaking the parliamentary alliance with the Liberals would convey that the NDP prioritizes safeguarding Canada’s electoral system over short-term political gains. By doing so, Singh can exert substantial pressure on the government, leading to a full and independent public inquiry that holds those responsible accountable and strengthens our democracy.

In light of mounting evidence and the overwhelming demand for an independent public inquiry, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh must reassess the effectiveness of the alliance with the Liberals. Breaking this alliance would send a clear message to the government that the NDP is unwavering in its pursuit of transparency, accountability, and the restoration of Canadians’ trust in our democratic processes. It is time to prioritize the thorough investigation that our democracy deserves, placing the interests of the nation above partisan arrangements. (AI)

 

Thursday May 25, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 25, 2023

Opposition Parties Reject Access to Classified Information in Inquiry Decision

May 5, 2023

On Wednesday, the Bloc Québécois and the Conservatives aligned in their refusal to examine classified information that had led to a watchdog’s recommendation against a public inquiry into allegations of foreign interference. Both party leaders expressed their reluctance to be bound by the obligation of secrecy.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, however, urged his colleagues to prioritize facts over partisan interests, specifically calling out Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre. During an event in Winnipeg, Trudeau criticized Poilievre, stating, “Pierre Poilievre is deliberately choosing to remain uninformed.”

David Johnston, appointed by Trudeau as a special rapporteur in March to investigate the foreign interference allegations, presented his initial report on Tuesday. The report advised against initiating a public inquiry into the allegations of foreign interference during the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. These allegations had been a contentious issue for the government following reports by Global News and the Globe and Mail, which referred to leaked national security documents and anonymous sources.

News: Poilievre calls on Singh to force a foreign interference inquiry  

March 24, 2023

In his report, Johnston also recommended that the government grant the necessary security clearances to other party leaders, allowing them access to the complete report, including a confidential annex of materials used to reach his conclusions. Despite calls from the NDP, Conservatives, and Bloc Québécois for a public inquiry, Johnston explained that due to national security concerns, the reviewed intelligence must remain classified. Consequently, a formal inquiry would largely be conducted behind closed doors. Instead, Johnston pledged to hold public hearings to discuss the broader issue of foreign interference, without delving into the specific allegations.

Johnston acknowledged the challenge of not being able to publicly disclose the reviewed information and emphasized the importance of future potential leaders of the country intentionally remaining unaware. He also recognized the opposition leaders’ desire not to be constrained by security laws that prohibit the sharing of such material.

March 9, 2023

Trudeau accepted Johnston’s findings and sent letters to Opposition leaders, inviting them to begin the process of obtaining the required security clearances. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh expressed his intention to do so. However, Poilievre rejected the offer, vowing to call for a public inquiry if the Conservatives formed the next government. Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet also supported him, describing the opportunity as “a misguided trap.”

Trudeau urged opposition leaders, including Poilievre, to review the substance of Johnston’s report, emphasizing the gravity of the situation. He singled out Poilievre, stating, “He is more interested in political arguments and personal attacks than in confronting the facts. Can we consider him a serious leader?”

Poilievre, speaking to reporters in Toronto on Wednesday, criticized Johnston as a “Trudeau insider,” highlighting the former governor general’s friendship with Prime Minister Trudeau’s father, Pierre Elliott Trudeau, and his involvement in the foundation named after the former prime minister. In response, Johnston defended his work and his relationship with the current prime minister, stating that their families had gone skiing together decades ago.

Erin O’Toole: I met with David Johnston for his report – here’s what happened  

March 17, 2023

Poilievre suggested that an experienced judge in handling national security cases should be responsible for determining which information should remain classified and what could be made public if an inquiry were to be called. He asserted, “Justin Trudeau is concealing something.”

Although Poilievre declined the opportunity to closely examine the report himself, he stated that he would not hinder the review by Conservative MPs serving on the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians. Johnston confirmed that these committee members would receive additional information and could challenge his conclusions if necessary.

On Wednesday, MPs from the NDP, Conservatives, and Bloc Québécois on the House of Commons procedure committee jointly signed a letter requesting Johnston’s presence before them to answer questions about his decision not to recommend a public inquiry. The letter, shared on social media by Conservative MP Michael Cooper, characterized Johnston’s decision as “a disregard for diaspora groups who face abuse and intimidation from hostile foreign governments.” (AI)

 

Wednesday May 10, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 9, 2023

The Beaver and the Panda: A Forest Showdown

Once upon a time, in a peaceful forest, there lived a meek and hardworking beaver named Canada. He always tried to avoid conflict and maintain good relations with his neighbours. One day, a fearsome panda named China came to the forest and demanded respect from all the animals.

At first, the beaver tried to appease the panda by being friendly and accommodating. However, the panda became increasingly aggressive and began to interfere in the beaver’s affairs. The beaver suspected that the panda was trying to intimidate him and his family.

News: Trudeau says expulsion of Chinese diplomat shows Canada ‘will not be intimidated’  

March 26, 2013

One day, the beaver had enough of the panda’s interference and decided to take action. He expelled a Chinese delegate who was causing trouble in the forest. In retaliation, the panda expelled a Canadian diplomat.

But the beaver was not intimidated by the panda’s aggressive behavior. He stood firm and declared that he would not accept foreign interference in his forest. The panda was stymied by the beaver’s sudden aggressiveness and promised further unspecified retaliatory measures.

Researcher: China working to get Canadians ‘at each other’s throats’ 

Despite the panda’s threats, the beaver remained resolute and determined to protect his forest from foreign interference. He warned the panda and other countries engaging in such behaviour that he takes it extraordinarily seriously.

February 25, 2023

In the end, the beaver’s courage and determination paid off. He showed the panda that he was not to be trifled with and that he would do whatever it takes to safeguard his forest from foreign threats. The panda learned a valuable lesson and realized that he could not bully the beaver into submission.

And they lived happily ever after. (AI)

 

Friday April 14, 2023

April 15, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 14, 2023

Babysitting Trudeau: Will Katie Telford’s Testimony Shed Light on Foreign Interference?

March 24, 2023

As we watch Katie Telford, the chief of staff in the Prime Minister’s Office, testify before a parliamentary committee on foreign interference in Canadian elections, it’s hard not to imagine her as a babysitter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. Telford, who has been by Trudeau’s side since his early days in politics, has been referred to as “one of the most powerful women in this country” by Conservative MP Raquel Dancho. She has been the ultimate gatekeeper for Trudeau, shaping the political messaging and information that reaches him.

But Telford’s testimony at the committee raises questions about accountability and transparency in the PMO. She has appeared before committees in the past, but Conservative MP Melissa Lantsman rightly asks, “What is the difference this time?” Telford’s role in the Liberal party and her closeness to Trudeau make her testimony crucial in understanding the issue of foreign interference in Canadian elections. However, there are concerns that the committee may not learn anything of value from her, and that her testimony may be a waste of time.

Opinion: Justin Trudeau’s most trusted adviser has always avoided the spotlight. That’s about to change  

February 20, 2019

Moreover, Telford’s unelected position as chief of staff highlights the issue of unaccountable power in the PMO. She and Gerald Butts, Trudeau’s former principal secretary, both have significant influence in the government without being elected by Canadians. This raises questions about democratic accountability and whether the power of the PMO needs to be diluted, as Trudeau had promised in the past.

Telford’s background as a longtime political strategist, who started her career in politics at a young age and has been with Trudeau through multiple election campaigns, speaks to her expertise in navigating the political landscape. However, her loyalty to the Liberal party has also been criticized, with some arguing that she serves the party rather than the interests of Canadians.

News: Trudeau’s top aide to face MPs’ questions today about China’s election meddling  

March 2, 2023

As Telford testifies before the committee, it’s important to keep in mind the larger context of accountability, transparency, and democratic governance in the PMO. Canadians deserve a government that is transparent and accountable, and that values the interests of the people above party politics. As Telford answers questions about foreign interference in Canadian elections, let’s hope that her testimony sheds light on the issue and helps to strengthen our democracy. (AI)