mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Archives
  • DOWNLOADS
  • Kings & Queens
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • Prime Ministers
  • Special Features
  • The Boutique
  • Who?
  • Young Doug Ford
  • Presidents

freedom

Wednesday February 5, 2025

February 5, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Wednesday February 5, 2025

(First published in The Hamilton Spectator, October 2, 2020)

America First, Allies Last

Donald Trump's tariff threats have united Canadians, sparking renewed patriotism and prompting a reassessment of economic independence and national identity.

February 5, 2025

Under President Trump’s second term, American leadership on the global stage is experiencing significant challenges. With an “America First” stance, the administration has prioritized national interests over global collaboration, resulting in strained relationships with allies like Canada and contentious tariff negotiations. This shift reflects a departure from traditional U.S. foreign policy, leading to concerns about the erosion of America’s moral and diplomatic influence.

In the Middle East, Trump’s proposal to transform the Gaza Strip into a luxury destination, without considering the desires of the Palestinian people, exemplifies a unilateral approach that risks exacerbating regional tensions. Such actions suggest an exercise of American imperialism, overlooking the complexities of international conflicts.

November 14, 2017

Historically, the U.S. has been a beacon of democracy and freedom, but the current trajectory signals a withdrawal from these responsibilities. The fading perception of American leadership is prompting allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies, potentially leaving a void in global leadership.

In this uncertain era, it’s vital for the U.S. to reaffirm its commitment to democratic values and international cooperation. The world watches to see if America will reclaim its role as a leader in shaping a just and equitable global order, or continue down a path of isolation and diminished influence. The future of global leadership and American exceptionalism hangs in the balance.

This editorial cartoon has been repurposed after being first published October 2, 2020.

Posted in: Canada, USA Tagged: 2025-03, alliances, America, American exceptionalism, burial, coffin, Democracy, freedom, Global, imperialism, influence, isolationism, leadership, liberty, perception, tariffs, tombstone, Trade, USA

Saturday August 24, 2024

August 24, 2024 by Graeme MacKay
The recent DNC's interpretation of "freedom" underscores the growing divide in contemporary politics, where notions of individual rights and community welfare clash, revealing how personal definitions of freedom can either empower or restrict others within an increasingly polarized society.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator,  Saturday August 24, 2024

Two Forms of Freedom in a Polarized World

Here’s the Pinterest ink to the animated version of this editorial cartoon.

The 2024 presidential race has transformed into a powerful narrative of poetic justice as Donald Trump potentially faces Kamala Harris, a Black woman, symbolizing a rejection of his divisive legacy and the embrace of a more inclusive future, highlighted by Barack Obama’s lofty critiques and Michelle Obama’s sharper, more pointed attacks.

Thursday August 21, 2024

Following the recent Democratic National Convention in 2024, where the theme of “freedom” was emphasized, we are reminded of the complex nature of freedom in an increasingly polarized world. This concept, while celebrated in various forms, has taken on two distinct meanings that resonate deeply in both the United States and Canada. These emerging interpretations of freedom highlight the tension between individual rights and communal responsibilities, prompting us to reflect on what freedom means in a contemporary context.

Analysis: How Democrats at DNC are seizing on ‘freedom’ theme after years of GOP monopoly

The first interpretation of freedom is rooted in a strong sense of individualism, often promoting a mindset that prioritizes personal autonomy over collective well-being. This perspective is characterized by a notion of “I have the freedom to trample on your freedoms.” We witnessed this during Canada’s “Freedom Convoy,” where protestors framed their resistance to public health measures as a fight for personal liberties. This sentiment echoes the rhetoric of U.S. politicians like Kamala Harris, who often champions individual rights and personal autonomy, particularly concerning reproductive rights and civil liberties. However, this focus on personal freedoms can sometimes overlook the collective implications of those freedoms, particularly in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

In Canada, Pierre Poilievre has similarly tapped into this individualistic narrative, promoting the idea of personal freedoms and economic liberties. His appeal to voters often hinges on a populist message that positions him as a champion of the everyday individual against government overreach. Poilievre’s rhetoric during the Freedom Convoy protests highlighted a disdain for restrictions perceived as infringing on personal rights, reflecting a belief that individual choice should take precedence over collective health measures.

In contrast, the second interpretation of freedom emphasizes the interconnectedness of individual rights and societal responsibilities. This vision posits that true freedom cannot exist in isolation; it must be contextualized within a framework of community welfare. Here, the key question is: “What freedoms threaten the public good?”

This perspective has gained traction in progressive movements across both Canada and the U.S., particularly as we confront issues of systemic inequality and social justice. Advocates for this view argue that some personal freedoms, when exercised without regard for others, can undermine societal cohesion. For instance, the right to free speech, while essential, can become problematic when it is used to propagate hate or discrimination.

Kamala Harris, in her role as Vice President, often emphasizes a holistic approach to freedom, advocating for policies that aim to uplift marginalized communities and ensure equitable access to opportunities. Her stance illustrates a commitment to a vision of freedom that recognizes the importance of social justice and collective well-being.

June 29, 2022

On the Canadian front, Pierre Poilievre has often found himself at odds with this collective perspective, promoting a more libertarian approach that prioritizes economic freedoms. However, as he navigates his leadership within the Conservative Party, he is increasingly challenged to balance individual rights with the realities of social issues such as housing affordability and climate change. The question remains: can a focus on individual economic freedoms coexist with the pressing need for communal solutions?

Opinion: Canada’s conservatives care about freedom—except in health care

Examining these competing visions of freedom necessitates an exploration of the cultural contexts that shape them. In American society, individualism has long been celebrated as a hallmark of personal identity, emphasizing self-reliance and autonomy. This cultural narrative often leads to a belief that individual rights should supersede collective interests. However, this emphasis on personal freedom can sometimes devolve into selfishness, especially when it results in neglecting communal responsibilities and values.

September 13, 2012

In contrast, Canadians typically lean toward a more collectivist philosophy, valuing the good of the community over strict individualism. While this approach is often criticized as overly socialist or even “communist,” it fundamentally seeks to foster a society where individual freedoms are harmonized with the rights of others. Canadians tend to prioritize social safety nets and public services as essential components of freedom, believing that true liberty flourishes within a framework of mutual support and responsibility.

Ultimately, the question of freedom has become deeply personal, shaped by individual experiences, beliefs, and values. Some embrace a form of freedom that champions personal choice and autonomy, while others advocate for a vision that acknowledges the necessity of limitations for the greater good. This divergence reflects a broader societal struggle to balance individual rights with communal obligations, and it highlights the challenges we face in navigating an increasingly polarized world.

As we continue to grapple with these contrasting interpretations of freedom, it is vital to foster a dialogue that recognizes the complexity of these issues. Figures like Kamala Harris and Pierre Poilievre embody the current cultural and political divides, reminding us that our definitions of freedom are not only shaped by individual beliefs but also by the collective needs of our societies. Only through understanding and empathy can we find common ground and work toward a vision of freedom that honours both individual rights and the collective good. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2024-15, animated, Democratic, DNC, DNC2024, Donald Trump, freedom, GOP, Kamala Harris, liberty, Pierre Poilievre, Republican, rights, USA

Saturday May 4, 2024

May 4, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

The concerns regarding Pierre Poilievre's casual use of the Notwithstanding clause include the potential undermining of the balance of power, diminishing the importance of Charter rights, the risk of misuse and abuse, and setting a dangerous precedent for future governments.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday May 4, 2024

The Notwithstanding Clause Should Not Be a Regular Strategy of Governing

Both Bonnie Crombie and Pierre Poilievre's opposition to the carbon tax raises questions about their alternative plans for addressing climate change, leaving voters to wonder: if not a carbon tax, then what specific measures do they propose to tackle this urgent issue, if any at all?

March 22, 2024

The federal Conservatives’ proposal to utilize the notwithstanding clause to override Charter-protected rights and freedoms has sparked a heated debate. While Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre initially focused on criminal justice matters, the Official Opposition did not rule out its application to other policy areas. This article serves as a warning to Poilievre, urging him to reconsider using the notwithstanding clause as a regular strategy of governing. The potential consequences of such an approach, along with the context of recent discussions, must be carefully considered.

Opinion: Poilievre flirts with far right while media looks away

Earlier this week, Poilievre avoided clarifying how often he intended to use the notwithstanding clause when questioned by the media. His spokesperson later stated that their attention was focused on ensuring the imprisonment of the most dangerous criminals, such as mass murderers and child predators, to protect the safety of Canadians. However, the use of the notwithstanding clause has been increasingly invoked by provincial governments to restrict labor rights, freedom of expression, and religion. This raises concerns about the purpose and legitimacy of the clause, as well as its potential misuse.

December 1, 2022

Poilievre specifically mentioned his intention to override a Supreme Court ruling that struck down a law allowing for life sentences with no chance of parole. He referred to the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, who committed a heinous act by killing six Muslim worshippers in a Quebec City mosque in 2017. The Supreme Court ruled that sentencing mass killers, including terrorists, to whole-life sentences constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Poilievre criticized this ruling, arguing that Bissonnette should remain behind bars for life. However, legal experts have pointed out that Poilievre’s comments misrepresent Bissonnette’s sentence, as the 25-year mark only represents the earliest eligibility for parole. They emphasize that the Charter was designed to protect the rights of unpopular minorities and prevent the government from engaging in cruel and unusual punishment.

News: Love the idea or hate it, experts say federal use of notwithstanding clause would be a bombshell 

September 11, 2018

Using the notwithstanding clause as a regular strategy of governing poses significant risks. It undermines the balance of power and judicial independence, as well as diminishes the importance of Charter-protected rights and freedoms. Regular reliance on the clause erodes public confidence and trust in the government’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights. Furthermore, it sets a dangerous precedent by allowing the government to override rights without sufficient justification. The notwithstanding clause was intended to be a limited and exceptional measure, and using it as a routine tool undermines the integrity of our democratic system.

The artist at work drawing this cartoon from a remote location: student housing in Ottawa

Pierre Poilievre must heed this warning and carefully consider the potential consequences of using the notwithstanding clause as a regular strategy of governing. The context surrounding recent discussions, including the case of Alexandre Bissonnette, highlights the importance of protecting individual rights and maintaining the balance of power within our democratic system. Rather than diluting the purpose of the notwithstanding clause, Poilievre should seek alternative approaches that uphold the principles of justice, equality, and respect for Charter-protected rights. Our democracy’s strength lies in the preservation of checks and balances and the protection of individual rights for all Canadians. (AI)

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2024-08, Canada, climate change, freedom, notwithstanding clause, Pierre Poilievre, rights, whack-a-mole

Wednesday January 4, 2023

January 4, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday January 4, 2023

Convoy organizer says plans to stage a 2023 protest in Winnipeg are off

Freedom Convoy 2.0 appears to be a bust.

February 10, 2022

Canada Unity, one of the anti-government protest groups behind the protests that headlined much of last year, has called off its plans to restage the event in Winnipeg in February.

“The Canada Unity Official Freedom Convoy 2.0 Reunion that was scheduled for Feb. 17 to 20th, 2023, is hereby officially being issued a 10-7 ‘out of service,” James Bauder wrote in a news release posted to the group’s Facebook page.

Bauder, who founded Canada Unity, said in December he would bring a four-day event back to Ottawa, staging it at an undisclosed spot outside the city and making daily trips to Parliament Hill. After police in Ottawa indicated they would have zero tolerance for such an event, Bauder said he would move it to Winnipeg instead.

He has now called that off, too.

In his Facebook post, he blamed non-specific security breaches and personal attacks.

Despite the fact the event was set to unfold in Manitoba, he said he is worried he or others could be charged under Ontario’s new Bill 100, which was passed last year after the first convoy protests. The law, dubbed the “keeping Ontario open for business act,” prohibits protests at protected transportation infrastructure, including airports and border crossings. It also allows for police to seize drivers’ licences and licence plates used in illegal blockades.

February 8, 2022

Bauder was among dozens of people arrested in February 2022 during the first convoy. He faces charges including mischief, and disobeying court orders and the police. One of his bail conditions bars him from travelling to downtown Ottawa.

The original convoy blocked several areas around Parliament Hill for three weeks. Demonstrations also shut down at least four border crossings elsewhere in the country.

The blockades resulting in the federal government’s decision to invoke the Emergencies Act for the first time.

In the weeks leading up to the first protest in Ottawa, Bauder penned a “memorandum of understanding” and tried to deliver it to Gov. Gen. Mary Simon. It asked her and all sitting senators to sign an agreement that would overthrow the government and make Simon, the senators, Bauder, his wife Sandra and one other man the formal Canadian government.

They would then order all other levels of government to end every COVID-19-related restriction and reinstate workers who were suspended or fired for not being vaccinated.

Bauder’s group later joined with others to create the convoy blockade that also affected several other parts of downtown Ottawa and some provincial legislatures.

As the events unfolded in Ottawa, Bauder did not appear to be among the main organizers or leaders.

November 5, 2022

A public inquiry that investigated the government’s decision to invoke the Emergencies Act held six weeks of public hearings in the fall, which laid bare the details of chaos and dysfunction both within the various groups organizing the protests and the police forces and governments trying to end them.

A final report from that inquiry is expected next month. (The Toronto Star) 

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2023, 2023-01, audition, Canada, casting, convoy, drama, freedom, protest, trucker

Tuesday December 6, 2022

December 6, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday December 6, 2022

Pierre Poilievre’s self-imposed media vacuum is about to face its first test

October 20, 2022

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre believes the voters whose support he needs to lead his party to government in the next federal election will not be reached via the mainstream media.

His strategy is about to be tested.

On Dec. 12, the voters of the GTA riding of Mississauga-Lakeshore will be going to the polls to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of Liberal MP Sven Spengemann last spring.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2022-41, bitcoin, Canada, Conservative, convoy, freedom, Journalism, leader, media, party, Pierre Poilievre, press, procreate, transparency
1 2 … 8 Next »

Please note…

This website contains satirical commentaries of current events going back several decades. Some readers may not share this sense of humour nor the opinions expressed by the artist. To understand editorial cartoons it is important to understand their effectiveness as a counterweight to power. It is presumed readers approach satire with a broad minded foundation and healthy knowledge of objective facts of the subjects depicted.

  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Toronto Star
  • The Globe & Mail
  • The National Post
  • Graeme on T̶w̶i̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶(̶X̶)̶
  • Graeme on F̶a̶c̶e̶b̶o̶o̶k̶
  • Graeme on T̶h̶r̶e̶a̶d̶s̶
  • Graeme on Instagram
  • Graeme on Substack
  • Graeme on Bluesky
  • Graeme on Pinterest
  • Graeme on YouTube
New and updated for 2025
  • HOME
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • The Boutique
  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Association of Canadian Cartoonists
  • The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists
  • You Might be From Hamilton if…
  • Young Doug Ford
  • MacKay’s Most Viral Cartoon
  • Intellectual Property Thief Donkeys
  • Wes Tyrell
  • Martin Rowson
  • Guy Bado’s Blog
  • National Newswatch
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design

Brand New Designs!

Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Archives

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial
 

Loading Comments...