gay

Thursday September 21, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday September 21, 2023

A Complex Blend of Inclusion and Intolerance

February 8, 2022

In the past, the “1 Million March 4 Children” gathered to protest queer-inclusive policies in schools. However, this event featured a confusing mix of activists, some aligned with intolerant ideologies. Questions arose about the true nature of this movement.

The 1 Million March 4 Children drew attention, with counter-protests emerging. Yet, the protests lacked clarity due to diverse participants, including Christian Nationalists, conservative Muslims, conspiracy theorists, and anti-education activists. This lack of cohesion raised concerns.

Under #1MillionMarch4Children, two main groups, Family ❤️ Freedom and Hands Off Our Kids, stood out. The former appeared more secular and inclusive, while the latter leaned religious and anti-queer. Both opposed queer-inclusive education in schools.

News: Hundreds of protesters, counterprotesters descend on HWDSB office  

May 4, 2023

Despite confusion, local organizations took safety measures and organized counter-protests. The discourse surrounding these protests mirrored transphobic narratives from the UK and the US, indicating an alarming trend of intolerance in Canada.

These protests were far from unified, highlighting the challenges in achieving inclusive education. Activists must collaborate with local organizations to protect LGBTQ2S+ rights and preserve inclusive education. Education remains a powerful tool for fostering acceptance; it must not be undermined.(AI)

 

Tuesday August 27, 2019

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday August 27, 2019

Andrew Scheer said gay couples lack ‘inherent’ quality of marriage in tape of 2005 speech unearthed by Liberals

The Liberals are challenging Andrew Scheer to march in Ottawa’s Pride Parade this week, after unearthing a 2005 speech the Conservative leader made suggesting same-sex marriage cannot be considered marriage at all.

December 13, 2017

Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale released a video of the speech on Twitter on Thursday that shows the then 25-year-old Scheer giving a speech in opposition to the Civil Marriage Act, which legalized same-sex unions in Canada.

“There is nothing more important to society than the raising of children, for its very survival requires it,” Scheer said.

“Homosexual unions are by nature contradictory to this . . . Two members of the same sex may use their God-given free will to engage in acts, to cohabit and to own property together. They may commit themselves to monogamy. They may pledge to remain in a loving relationship for life.

“In that sense, they have many of the collateral features of marriage, but they do not have its inherent feature, as they cannot commit to the natural procreation of children. They cannot therefore be married.”

May 31, 2016

Scheer, along with the rest of then-leader Stephen Harper’s caucus, voted against legalizing gay marriage in 2005. Harper said at the time a Conservative government would revisit the law if elected, but avoided reigniting the debate over the almost decade he spent in power.

Like his predecessor, Scheer has tried to distance himself from major social conservative issues like abortion and same sex marriage. But the Conservative leader — a devoted Roman Catholic — has consistently refused to take part in Pride parades attended by politicians across the country.

December 8, 2006

Scheer’s office did not immediately respond to questions on whether his position on same sex marriage has evolved over the past 14 years. But earlier this month, a spokesperson for the Conservative leader said the party has a “proud history of fighting for the rights and protection of all Canadians, including those in the LGBTQ community, at home and abroad.”

Scheer’s office was responding to questions about why the leader avoided the Vancouver Pride Parade this month, which was attended by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh and Green Party Leader Elizabeth May. (Hamilton Spectator)  

 

Tuesday June 14, 2016

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator Ð Tuesday June 14, 2016 Hamilton Pride Week follows deadly mass murder of gay night club in Florida The City of Hamilton and its LGBTQ Advisory Committee held a Pride Flag Raising Ceremony on June 13 from 12 to 1 p.m. in the Hamilton City Hall forecourt to kick off Pride Week 2016 and celebrate and honour Hamilton's LGBTQ community. The rainbow Pride and Trans Pride flags will fly at City Hall throughout Pride week. (Source.) http://www.thespec.com/community-story/6719440-hamilton-s-lgbtq-community-raises-the-pride-flag-monday/ Pride week was launched the Monday following a horrific mass shooting occurred on Saturday night in a gay night club in Orlando, Florida.ÊÊIt marked the deadliest mass shooting in the United States and the nation's worst terror attack since 9/11, authorities said. (Source CNN)Êhttp://www.cnn.com/2016/06/12/us/orlando-nightclub-shooting/ Hamilton, LGBTQ. LGBT, Pride, mass shooting, massacre, gay, ISIS, terrorism, hate

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 14, 2016

Hamilton Pride Week follows deadly mass murder at gay night club in Florida

The City of Hamilton and its LGBTQ Advisory Committee held a Pride Flag Raising Ceremony on June 13 from 12 to 1 p.m. in the Hamilton City Hall forecourt to kick off Pride Week 2016 and celebrate and honour Hamilton’s LGBTQ community.

The rainbow Pride and Trans Pride flags will fly at City Hall throughout Pride week. (Source.)

Pride week was launched the Monday following a horrific mass shooting occurred on Saturday night in a gay night club in Orlando, Florida.  It marked the deadliest mass shooting in the United States and the nation’s worst terror attack since 9/11, authorities said. (Source: CNN)

 

Tuesday May 31, 2016

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator Ð Tuesday May 31, 2016 'Freedom and respect': Conservatives strike marriage definition from party policy Conservative delegates at the party's policy convention in Vancouver have voted to strike the definition of marriage in the party's official policy document. In a 1,036-462 vote, delegates from all provinces except Saskatchewan cast majority votes in favour of no longer defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman. "I think our party got a little more Canadian today," Calgary MP Michelle Rempel said after the vote. "It's a milestone and it's not just a milestone for our party, it's a milestone for all Canadians.Ó "Yes, it took us 10 years to get to this point, but I think this is something that is a beacon for people around the world who are looking at equality rights. Canada is a place where we celebrate equality.Ó The result followed a heated debate and prompted some high-fives and cheers across the hall. It shifts the party's official position on same-sex marriage from being against the unions to neutral. Eric Lorenzen, from an Eastern Ontario riding, said during the debate that as a gay Conservative, he found it troubling that his party told him his relationship with his partner was not valued. "What other group does our party have a negative policy towards? A policy of restricting civil rights and restricting full participation in society?" he said, drawing applause. The result followed a heated debate and prompted some high-fives and cheers across the hall. It shifts the party's official position on same-sex marriage from being against the unions to neutral. Eric Lorenzen, from an Eastern Ontario riding, said during the debate that as a gay Conservative, he found it troubling that his party told him his relationship with his partner was not valued. "What other group does our party have a negative policy towards? A policy of restricting civil rights and restricting full parti

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday May 31, 2016

‘Freedom and respect’: Conservatives strike marriage definition from party policy

Conservative delegates at the party’s policy convention in Vancouver have voted to strike the definition of marriage in the party’s official policy document.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator Ð Thursday May 19, 2016 Some Conservatives now ready to support bill on transgender rights When C-279, the private member's bill that would have added gender identity to the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code, came before the House of Commons for a vote in 2013, Conservative MPs Rona Ambrose and Tony Clement voted against it. This time around, Ambrose and Clement say they will be voting in favour when the Liberal government's bill to add gender identity to the human rights act and the code, C-16, comes before the House for a vote. Neither vote is likely to be crucial to the bill's success: with Liberal and NDP support, the bill should pass the House of Commons comfortably. But they could mark a change of opinion that might still be significant. Clement pointed to the influence he takes from his three children. "I have three children, ages 24, 22 and 18. They span the political spectrum but in their generation this is a foregone issue," he said. "They don't even understand why this would be debated.Ó He also says it makes sense that transgender Canadians should be included among those who have their rights acknowledged. While Liberals, New Democrats and 18 Conservatives supported the bill tabled by NDP Randall Garrison, Conservatives accounted for all of the 137 votes opposed. Clement says that in 2013, the advice to Conservatives from the Justice Department was that the bill was unnecessary because gender identity was already covered by the law. Ambrose and Clement follow Conservative MP David Tilson who told CBC News on Monday that his view had changed since voting against C-279 in 2013. That change of opinion is not unanimous. Conservative Senator Don Plett, who opposed C-279 and moved amendments that excluded areas such as bathrooms from the bill's provisions, told reporters on Tuesday that his position has not changed. "You know my feeling on transgender rights," he said. "They hav

May 19, 2016

In a 1,036-462 vote, delegates from all provinces except Saskatchewan cast majority votes in favour of no longer defining marriage as a union between one man and one woman.

“I think our party got a little more Canadian today,” Calgary MP Michelle Rempel said after the vote. “It’s a milestone and it’s not just a milestone for our party, it’s a milestone for all Canadians.”

“Yes, it took us 10 years to get to this point, but I think this is something that is a beacon for people around the world who are looking at equality rights. Canada is a place where we celebrate equality.”

January 13, 2012

The result followed a heated debate and prompted some high-fives and cheers across the hall. It shifts the party’s official position on same-sex marriage from being against the unions to neutral.

Eric Lorenzen, from an Eastern Ontario riding, said during the debate that as a gay Conservative, he found it troubling that his party told him his relationship with his partner was not valued.

“What other group does our party have a negative policy towards? A policy of restricting civil rights and restricting full participation in society?” he said, drawing applause.

December 8, 2006

The result followed a heated debate and prompted some high-fives and cheers across the hall. It shifts the party’s official position on same-sex marriage from being against the unions to neutral.

Eric Lorenzen, from an Eastern Ontario riding, said during the debate that as a gay Conservative, he found it troubling that his party told him his relationship with his partner was not valued.

“What other group does our party have a negative policy towards? A policy of restricting civil rights and restricting full participation in society?” he said, drawing applause. (Source: CBC News)