Green Energy

Wednesday October 18, 2023

Premier Doug Ford's recent efforts to protect Ontario's Greenbelt are met with skepticism, as his government's track record, including a shift towards fossil fuels and the cancellation of green energy projects, raises doubts about their commitment to environmental preservation.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday October 18, 2023

Is Doug Ford’s Ploy a Real Greenbelt Reset or Just Smoke and Mirrors?

September 26, 2023

The recent moves by Premier Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservatives to protect the Greenbelt in Ontario might seem like a step in the right direction. However, it’s essential to take a closer look at their motivations and track record. The Ford government’s attempt to curtail the Greenbelt development and regain public trust is nothing more than a cynical ploy to distract from their questionable actions and their approach to renewable energy.

The $8.28-billion land swap scandal, currently under investigation by the RCMP, has left the Tories scrambling to rebuild their tarnished reputation. They’ve introduced a law that promises to restore the Greenbelt properties they previously sought to remove and enhance protections for this ecologically sensitive area. While this might appear as a positive move, it is essential to scrutinize their true intentions.

News: Ontario government tables bill to return lands it removed back to Greenbelt

July 11, 2018

The Ford government has a track record that contradicts their newfound commitment to environmental preservation. They’ve consistently undermined efforts to transition to renewable energy sources while increasing reliance on fossil fuels, particularly natural gas. A recent investigation has revealed that gas plants in Ontario, once promised to operate only during peak electricity demand, are running 12 or more hours a day, contributing to dirtier power and worsening climate change. This not only contradicts their alleged commitment to environmental protection but also raises serious concerns about their energy policy choices.

The government’s decision to scrap over 700 green energy projects as “unnecessary and expensive” is another example of their disregard for clean energy initiatives. Rather than investing in renewable sources, they are opting to build more gas plants, further perpetuating the reliance on fossil fuels. This is a stark departure from the previous government’s approach, which aimed to replace coal-fired pollution machines with gas-fired plants while transitioning to a cleaner energy mix.

Investigation: Ontario gas plants were supposed to run only during peak periods. Instead they’re running most of the time, polluting the air you breathe

October 16, 2020

The solution is clear: Ontario should be investing in renewable energy sources, like wind and solar power, to reduce reliance on gas “peaker plants.” The expansion of renewables, as seen in California and the Midwest, offers a blueprint for a more sustainable energy future. In contrast, Ontario lags behind, with only eight percent of peak demand being met by renewable sources in 2022.

Premier Doug Ford’s current approach to energy and the environment raises concerns similar to the gas plant scandal that marred former Premier Dalton McGuinty’s legacy. Like McGuinty, Ford may come to regret his government’s hasty dismissal of clean energy initiatives that are crucial for Ontario’s future. Instead of using the Greenbelt issue as a smokescreen to divert attention from their actions, the Ford government should prioritize the expansion of renewable energy sources and the reduction of their dependence on fossil fuels. It is only through meaningful actions, not political posturing, that they can be trusted as stewards of the environment. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try:

 

Thursday May 18, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 18, 2023

Doug Ford’s Green Energy Hypocrisy: Subsidies, Subsidies Everywhere

November 22, 2019

In the tangled web of political hypocrisy, few examples are as glaring as the dispute over subsidizing foreign Electric Vehicle (EV) battery corporations in Ontario. Premier Doug Ford finds himself entangled in a battle with the federal government, demanding more funding to keep the Stellantis plant in Windsor. However, it’s essential to remember that Ford came to power on the promise of ending the Wynne/McGuinty Green Energy Deal. The irony is palpable.

The current showdown revolves around the Stellantis battery factory project, a significant endeavor that could shape Canada’s green energy economy. Stellantis, parent company of Chrysler, Jeep, and Fiat, halted construction on the $5-billion project, insisting that the federal government match the subsidies offered by the United States, similar to those given to Volkswagen in St. Thomas. Premier Ford argues that Ontario has already paid its fair share and it’s now Ottawa’s turn to sweeten the pot.

Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, on the other hand, asserts that both Stellantis and the province should shoulder their fair share of the increased business costs caused by the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act. She highlights the need for provinces benefiting directly from such investments to contribute their share, emphasizing that the federal government’s resources are not infinite.

News: Ford ‘disappointed’ in feds’ handling of rocky Stellantis deal for EV battery plant  

July 11, 2018

What makes this situation particularly galling is the stark contrast between Ford’s stance now and his previous actions regarding green energy initiatives. When Ford assumed office, he wasted no time scrapping green incentive programs, such as the GreenON program, and canceling renewable energy projects, arguing that they were a burden on taxpayers. He touted these decisions as delivering on his campaign promise to dismantle the previous government’s green energy policies.

Yet here we are, witnessing Ford demanding significant subsidies to secure the future of the Stellantis plant, while simultaneously decrying the subsidies provided by the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act. It’s a case of selective opposition to government funding, conveniently forgetting his own assault on green energy just a few years ago.

The sheer scale of the subsidies involved is mind-boggling. The Trudeau government is prepared to spend up to $13 billion to subsidize the operation of the Volkswagen plant over the next decade, with an additional $700 million for construction. These numbers dwarf the $7 billion investment Volkswagen is making in the project. The disparity is alarming, raising concerns about the effectiveness and sustainability of such massive public spending.

October 16, 2020

While the push for a green energy economy is commendable, the question remains: Can we rely on public subsidies alone to secure long-term jobs and sustainable operations? Ford’s track record suggests otherwise. His cancellation of renewable energy projects and disdain for wind turbines underscores a lack of consistency and commitment to the green energy sector.

It’s crucial to hold our elected officials accountable for their actions and inconsistencies. Ford’s plea for more subsidies, despite his previous rejection of green energy initiatives, highlights a worrisome lack of principles. Ontario deserves a leader who genuinely prioritizes green energy, rather than one who opportunistically seeks subsidies while conveniently forgetting his own past decisions.

News: Ontario Premier Doug Ford defends $231-million cost of killing green-energy deals  

December 1, 2018

If Ford truly wants to be a champion of Ontario’s auto sector and green energy, he must recognize the importance of consistent policies and long-term investments. Hypocrisy and cherry-picking which subsidies to support will only lead to an unstable and uncertain future for Ontario’s green energy ambitions.

In the pursuit of a sustainable future, it’s essential to move beyond political theatrics and work towards comprehensive and transparent policies that foster genuine growth and innovation. Ontario deserves a leader who stands firm on their principles, even when the winds of political expediency blow in a different direction. (AI)

 

Wednesday May 17, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 17, 2023

Subsidy Buffet: Stalled Stellantis Project Raises Concerns of Demands from Foreign Corporations

The recent developments surrounding the Stellantis battery plant project in Windsor have sparked growing concerns about the implications of substantial government subsidies. The situation raises the alarm that such generous incentives might encourage other foreign corporations to demand similar treatment. It is akin to patrons at a restaurant, accustomed to table service, suddenly clamoring for unlimited access to an exclusive all-you-can-eat buffet.

April 28, 2023

Stellantis has confirmed that construction has come to a halt at the Windsor EV battery plant site, citing the failure of the Canadian government to fulfill its commitments as the primary reason. The potential scrapping of the project comes on the heels of Volkswagen receiving substantial subsidies totaling a staggering $13 billion to establish their presence in St. Thomas. The news has raised eyebrows, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford expressing his concerns about the situation.

News: Stellantis halts construction at Windsor EV battery plant over federal funding  

November 22, 2019

Premier Ford rightly points out that the federal government needs to demonstrate the same level of support they offered Volkswagen. He emphasizes the importance of the federal government stepping up and fulfilling its obligations, just as they have done previously. However, it is crucial to note that the federal government’s resources are not unlimited, as mentioned by Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland. This situation calls for a delicate balance between supporting vital investments and ensuring responsible allocation of resources.

The potential ramifications of the stalled Stellantis project extend beyond government commitments. Thousands of jobs hang in the balance, making it imperative for all parties involved to find a constructive resolution. The City of Windsor, committed to leveraging available resources, is actively seeking a solution that will benefit the community. Negotiations are ongoing, and it is essential for all stakeholders to work collaboratively towards a mutually beneficial agreement.

October 16, 2020

While the situation is concerning, Windsor-Tecumseh MP Irek Kusmierczyk provides reassurance that construction will continue, emphasizing the unwavering commitment to the project. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Minister of Innovation, François-Philippe Champagne, are actively engaged in discussions to secure a favorable outcome. It is encouraging to see the recognition of this investment as a generational opportunity for the auto sector and Canada as a whole.

However, the episode underscores the need for a comprehensive national auto policy. Without such a policy framework, it becomes challenging to navigate negotiations and ensure consistency in government support. Windsor West MP Brian Masse rightly points out the absence of a national auto policy as a contributing factor to the current concerns and uncertainties.

Opinion: Does a country have ‘no choice’ but to subsidize its auto industry?  

May 4, 2022

Moving forward, it is imperative for all levels of government to uphold their commitments and work collaboratively to establish a clear and consistent framework for supporting the auto industry. The Canadian economy relies heavily on this sector, and it is crucial to secure its future while ensuring responsible use of taxpayer funds.

The situation surrounding the Stellantis battery plant in Windsor serves as a wake-up call for the potential consequences of substantial government subsidies. While the commitment to supporting key investments is commendable, it is equally important to strike a balance between providing incentives and safeguarding the responsible use of public resources. A robust national auto policy can provide the necessary framework to address these challenges and ensure long-term success for the industry and the Canadian economy. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give editorial cartooning a try.

 

Friday October 16, 2020

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday October 16, 2020

Make Canada’s electric vehicle bet pay off

The federal and Ontario governments have just rolled the dice — using taxpayers’ money — in hopes of hitting it big in the electric vehicle industry.

November 22, 2019

After anteing up $295 million apiece, they recently convinced Ford Motor Co. of Canada to commit about $1.4 billion of its own money to start manufacturing these zero-emission machines and the batteries that power them at its Oakville plant by 2025. 

It’s a smart, and admirably non-partisan, gamble on the part of these governments that could preserve thousands of Canadian auto-sector jobs and grow the economy while doing something just as important — fighting climate change.

But if they want this steep, $590-million bet to pay off, they have to do more than just put up money. It’s not as easy as saying if you build it they’ll buy it. 

While there are plenty of hybrid and fully electric vehicles on the market, only about 0.5 per cent of the 23 million passenger vehicles on Canadian roads are electric. There are strong reasons more Canadians haven’t leapt behind the wheel of an EV, reasons Ottawa and Queen’s Park need to address.

October 3, 2020

For starters, electric vehicles are generally more expensive to buy than the ones driven by the internal combustion engines that are doing so much to heat up this planet. When it comes to range, most EVs can’t travel nearly as far on a full-charge as their gasoline-driven rivals on a full tank, though the gap is decreasing. And the number of electric recharging stations is pitifully small — just a fraction of the number of gas stations out there.

These negatives shouldn’t make anyone a naysayer about the future of Canada’s electric car and battery industry. It is, in fact, visionary for our nation to embrace what will surely be the technology of the future. Unfortunately there are no givens in the global auto sector and too often good intentions on the parts of governments and even industrial gurus don’t pan out. 

February 27, 2020

Canada badly lags behind other countries, such the United States, Germany, Japan and especially China in making EVs. When the current federal Liberal government asked every single EV manufacturer in the world to move to Canada, the answer was consistently no.

But there’s an upside to the fact that Ford Motor’s first zero-emission vehicles won’t roll of the line in Oakville for another five years. That gives the federal and Ontario governments a half decade to ensure their — your — investment ultimately pays off.

Canada needs recharge stations, lots of them. Establishing and paying for more of this essential infrastructure should be part of the federal Liberals’ plan for rebuilding post-pandemic Canada. 

Perhaps they could partner with existing gas stations. If their owners give the matter some thought they’ll realize they, too, have a stake in transitioning away from petroleum-based fuels.

Programs could be established or beefed up across the country to help homeowners as well as condo and apartment complexes, to install their own recharging facilities. In addition, the federal government should review its current rebate program for people buying electric vehicles to determine if it’s working and even if it should be enhanced.

Finally, attention must also be paid to the Canadian mining companies that produce the minerals, such as cobalt, nickel and lithium, that will go into the electric vehicle batteries. Do they require help in meeting what could be a significant new demand?

When it comes to electric vehicles, Ottawa and Queen’s Park may feel that, as Ford Motor once proclaimed, they have “a better idea.” They need to back it up. (Hamilton Spectator Editorial)