hot air

Wednesday April 10, 2024

Canada's diminishing military stature amidst rising global tensions, exemplified by Russia's aggression in Ukraine and the lasting effects of former U.S. President Donald Trump's rhetoric, underscores the urgent need for renewed prioritization and investment in Canadian defence, especially as NATO celebrates its 75th anniversary.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 10, 2024

Canada’s Defence Dilemma: A Legacy Fading Under the Stars and Stripes

May 29, 2002

As NATO celebrates its 75th anniversary amidst rising global tensions, Canadians are grappling with a troubling reality: our once-vibrant military legacy is fading under the shadows of American security alliances. This sobering moment comes at a time of heightened geopolitical turbulence, exacerbated by Russia’s brazen invasion of Ukraine and the lingering spectre of former U.S. President Donald Trump’s rhetoric threatening NATO’s cohesion.

News: NATO at 75: Is Canada losing its grip on the world’s greatest military alliance?

Canada must enhance efforts to meet NATO’s 2% defence spending target, reinforcing its obligations and commitments to global security.

March 1, 2024

The recent announcement of increased defence spending by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government, while a step forward, is also a stark reminder of years of neglect and misplaced priorities. Trudeau, suddenly pandering to calls for bolstering Canada’s defence, has had ample time since assuming office in 2015 to reverse the decline of our military capabilities. Instead, successive governments have allowed our armed forces to languish, reflecting a lack of will to prioritize and invest in our own defence.

Canada’s journey from a post-war military powerhouse to a nation dependent on American security alliances can be traced back to the gradual erosion of our military capabilities. The decline began with decisions made decades ago to let our military infrastructure deteriorate, coupled with a societal shift that undervalued the importance of investing in our national defence.

Donald Trump's recent remarks, cheering on aggression against NATO countries, and Canada's position as a buffer between Russia and potential U.S. instability, highlight the urgent need for a rethink on global security.

February 13, 2024

The spectre of Russia’s aggression in Ukraine underscores the urgent need for Canada to reclaim its role as a stalwart defender of democratic values and international security. However, our ability to project strength and credibility on the global stage has been compromised by years of underinvestment and strategic complacency.

Moreover, the unsettling rhetoric of former U.S. President Donald Trump, who openly mused about abandoning NATO and questioned the value of collective defence, sent shockwaves through the alliance. While Trump’s presidency has come to an end, the echoes of his disruptive rhetoric continue to reverberate, casting doubt on America’s steadfast commitment to its NATO allies. Now, with Trump hoping for a return in the 2024 election as the Republican presidential candidate, the prospect of renewed uncertainty in U.S. foreign policy looms large.

Opinion: Sham defence review shows Canada will never meet its commitments to NATO allies  

November 17, 2015

Prime Minister Trudeau’s sudden pivot towards bolstering defence spending seems reactive rather than proactive, highlighting a broader pattern of neglect towards our military forces. It’s a far cry from the era when Canada asserted its sovereignty by distancing itself from the security umbrella of the United Kingdom.

As we mark NATO’s milestone anniversary amidst geopolitical uncertainty, it’s time for Canadians to reassess our priorities and reclaim our legacy as a nation that values and invests in its military. Our armed forces deserve better than years of neglect and half-hearted commitments. Let’s heed the lessons of history and renew our dedication to a strong, independent, and capable Canadian military—one that reflects the values and aspirations of our nation. (AI)

 

Friday December 1, 2023

The Online News Act in Canada, a groundbreaking legislative framework securing fair compensation for news outlets from tech giants like Google and Meta, contrasts with the hot air of opposition leader Pierre Poilievre, who remains skeptical and resistant, raising concerns about fair terms, media sustainability, and the effectiveness of government agreements in shaping the news ecosystem.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday December 1, 2023

A Step Forward, Poilievre’s Stance a Step Back

December 6, 2022

In a recent breakthrough, Google and the federal government have forged an agreement over the Online News Act, marking a significant stride towards fair compensation for Canadian news outlets. The deal ensures that Google will continue sharing Canadian news online, accompanied by annual payments totaling around $100 million to support the news industry.

Heritage Minister Pascale St-Onge, instrumental in the negotiations, expressed confidence in addressing Google’s concerns, emphasizing the importance of finding common ground. The regulatory framework, incorporated into the C-18 legislative framework, is poised to be unveiled by mid-December, showcasing a commitment to transparency and accountability.

News: Ottawa agrees to $100-million deal with Google to keep news on platform  

August 4, 2023

The agreement, a product of extensive talks, not only secures financial support for news organizations but also addresses Google’s reservations about the Online News Act’s structural aspects. Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs, expressed gratitude for the government’s responsiveness to their concerns, acknowledging the commitment to address core issues.

However, amid this positive development, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre remains a notable critic. Poilievre has consistently opposed the idea of globalist tech firms compensating Canadians for the content they use to generate profits. His stance, epitomized by a proposed “Online News Don’t Act,” raises concerns about the fair treatment of local journalists.

April 15, 2023

While Google embraces negotiations and financial contributions, Poilievre’s reluctance to support the Online News Act suggests a different vision. The contrast between Google’s willingness to engage in fair compensation and Poilievre’s non-act approach underscores the potential implications for the Canadian news landscape.

The government’s success in reaching an agreement with Google sets a precedent for other countries, showcasing the effectiveness of legislation like Bill C-18. This achievement stands in stark contrast to Poilievre’s skepticism and reluctance to acknowledge the positive impact of regulatory frameworks.

News: Conservatives ran on similar media policy as Liberals, but now claim it’s censorship  

March 2, 2023

As Prime Minister Justin Trudeau hails the agreement as “very good news” and emphasizes the support for local journalism, Poilievre’s dissenting voice seems out of touch with the demonstrated commitment to a thriving news ecosystem. It is crucial to recognize the importance of fair compensation for journalists and the potential positive influence of legislation like the Online News Act.

The deal with Google represents a positive leap forward for Canadian media, demonstrating the effectiveness of legislative frameworks. While celebrating this achievement, it is essential to scrutinize and question opposition voices like Pierre Poilievre, who appear resistant to measures aimed at securing fair compensation for the backbone of our information ecosystem – our journalists. (AI)

 

Friday April 7, 2017

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 7, 2017

Council shifts $50M anti-poverty plan into an affordable housing initiative

Hamilton’s $50-million anti-poverty plan has transformed into an affordable housing plan.

September 18, 2013

City council approved Mayor Fred Eisenberger’s motion almost a year ago to set aside $30 million for a decade of unspecified measures to combat poverty and $20 million to fix or grow Hamilton’s social housing stock.

The money will come from future hydro utility dividends as well as Hamilton’s Future Fund.

City health and social services staff consulted local advocacy groups and experts on how best to spend the cash and presented a wide-ranging set of proposals to councillors Wednesday, including “wraparound” support for poverty-stricken single parents, “portable” rents for those seeking affordable housing and special funding for the urban aboriginal community.

November 25, 2009

Mayor Fred Eisenberger, who initially pitched reserving $30 million for a menu of poverty-fighting measures, said he understands councillors want to see a “cleaner, simpler” direction on how to spend the “historic” investment over a decade.

He seconded Collins’ motion, calling the focused housing approach a “fantastic step forward for this community.”

Coun. Matthew Green said he would only support the radical shift in strategy if the original unique plan to allocate $10 million for indigenous-led poverty-fighting initiatives was maintained in some way. “This is a top priority for me,” he said. (Source: Hamilton Spectator) 

 

Wednesday June 6, 2007

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, Editorial Cartoonist, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday June 6, 2007

‘No G8 deal on climate change’

World powers will not agree to firm targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions during the G8 summit, a senior US official has said.

May 25, 2006

World leaders are meeting in Heiligendamm on the Baltic coast for the annual Group of Eight gathering which comprises of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States.

Chairing the summit, German Chancellor Angela Merkel had hoped the US would back a pledge to have emissions halved by 2050 and limit warming of global temperatures to a key scientific threshold of 2C.

The Kyoto Protocol, the global climate change pact which the US is not a part of, expires in 2012 and leaders hope the summit can send a signal about their desire to come up with a successor to the deal.

Senior climate adviser to President George W Bush, James Connaughton, said: “We have opposed the two degrees temperature target, we are not alone in that.

“Japan, Russia, Canada and most other countries that I have spoken with do not support that as an objective for a variety of reasons. At this moment in time on that one particular issue we do not yet have agreement.” (ITV News)