mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Archives
  • DOWNLOADS
  • Kings & Queens
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • Prime Ministers
  • Special Features
  • The Boutique
  • Who?
  • Young Doug Ford
  • Presidents

Independence

Friday May 30 2025

May 30, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada firmly rejects Trump’s rhetoric of annexation as it seeks diversified defence partnerships with Europe, emphasizing sovereignty and strategic autonomy.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday May 30 2025

Published in the Toronto Star.

Canada’s Sovereignty is Not for Sale: Rejecting Trump’s 51st State Rhetoric

Canada elects Mark Carney to lead a minority government, signaling a rejection of Trump's influence and a commitment to national sovereignty.

April 30, 2025

In the latest saga of U.S.-Canada relations, President Donald Trump’s proposal for Canada to join the Golden Dome missile defence system has rekindled an age-old narrative that Canada could become the 51st state of the United States. This rhetoric, used as a bargaining chip to pressure Canada into a costly defence scheme, is not only disrespectful but fundamentally undermines the sovereignty of our nation.

Trump’s proposition—demanding that Canada pay a hefty US$61 billion for participation in the Golden Dome unless we concede to annexation—has been aptly described by Canadian UN Ambassador Bob Rae as akin to a “protection racket.” This comparison highlights the absurdity of the offer: pay an exorbitant fee for defence collaboration or lose our national identity. Such a proposal is not only offensive but also dismissive of Canada’s autonomy and history as a sovereign nation.

News: Senior Canadian diplomat calls Trump’s latest pitch to join missile defence system a ‘protection racket’

Canada, Pierre Poilievre, Donald Trump, Mark Carney, Liberation Day, tariffs, Canada, auto, trade, economy, leadership, "maple MAGA", politics, strategy, allegations, election

April 2, 2025

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s refusal to engage in public negotiations over this matter is a wise move, emphasizing that Canada is “not for sale” and “won’t be for sale, ever.” The rhetoric of annexation not only echoes historical overreach but also disregards the reality of Canada as a proud, independent country.

As the world faces escalating global threats, Canada recognizes the need to bolster its defence capabilities. The government has already committed to increasing defence spending, aiming to reach NATO’s target of 2% of GDP by 2030. However, the beneficiaries of this defence investment are shifting. Canada is looking eastward, toward Europe, rather than southward to the U.S., as it considers joining the ReArm Europe initiative. This strategic pivot is not merely a snub to the U.S. military-industrial complex; it is a calculated decision to diversify our defence partnerships and strengthen our domestic military industry.

ReArm Europe offers Canada the opportunity to collaborate with European allies, buying military equipment at competitive prices and providing a new market for Canadian defence products. This move allows Canada to reduce its reliance on the United States, which currently receives 75% of our defence procurement spending. By investing in non-traditional partners, Canada is not only enhancing its military capabilities but also asserting its economic independence and strategic autonomy.

News: Golden Dome? ReArm Europe? Canada negotiating military relationships amid trade war, sovereignty concerns

Pierre Poilievre sets a 2% GDP defence target by 2030, aligning with Mark Carney's similar commitment to enhance Canada's military spending.

April 23, 2025

Moreover, public sentiment reflects a growing disillusionment with Trump’s tactics. Many Canadians, as seen in reader comments, are frustrated with the idea of being coerced into a defence arrangement under the guise of annexation or economic pressure. The rhetoric of becoming a 51st state is not only unrealistic but also dismissive of Canada’s rich heritage and commitment to sovereign equality, principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter.

Canada’s path forward involves strengthening our defence through diversified partnerships and robust domestic investment. While we recognize the importance of collaboration with allies, it must be on terms that respect our sovereignty and strategic interests. Trump’s rhetoric is a reminder of the necessity to stand firm in our national identity and reject any proposals that compromise our independence. Canada’s future will be defined by partnerships that respect mutual interests, not by yielding to outdated and disrespectful notions of annexation.


Canada’s Defence Awakening: Beyond the Umbrella – Friday May 30, 2025

Posted to Substack

These are indeed interesting times for Canada, as the nation begins to recognize the importance of strengthening its defence capabilities. This was a central promise made to voters when they entrusted the newly led Liberal party with governance. Amidst the tense dynamics between Canada and the U.S., Trump’s questioning of Canadian sovereignty has unexpectedly served as a catalyst. It has prompted Canada to take its defence more seriously, encouraging us to step out from under the U.S. security umbrella and arm ourselves independently. Canadians seem to have accepted this reality, understanding that while we bolster our defences, there might be sacrifices in social spending elsewhere—but that’s a topic for another cartoon.

Canada must enhance efforts to meet NATO’s 2% defence spending target, reinforcing its obligations and commitments to global security.

Friday March 1, 2024 – More than a year ago, Canada’s Liberal government had not prioritized defence spending, focusing on its political standing during declining popularity, but escalating global tensions have since pressured Canada to balance domestic social investments with meeting NATO commitments.

In today’s cartoon, the scene unfolds at an arms Expo. On one side, European vendors display traditional military gear—jets, tanks, missiles—all in the familiar army green. On the opposite side, Trump’s “Golden Dome” gleams ostentatiously, with a sign that reads, “Just $61B or Become a State and It’s FREE*,” complete with a cheeky nod to terms and conditions. The humour lies in the absurdity of Trump’s offer and the fanciful price tag seemingly pulled from his bum.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010 – After Canada lost its bid for a UN Security Council seat to Portugal, the Conservative government blamed Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff for undermining their campaign, while Ignatieff criticized the government’s foreign policy, calling the loss a “sad day” and dismissing their blame as “ridiculous.”

What brings satisfaction is seeing Mark Carney adeptly handle this situation. Unlike his predecessor, he confidently asserts that Canada’s sovereignty empowers us to seek partnerships beyond the U.S., enhancing our defence strategy with new allies. The longstanding post-war security guarantee from the U.S. is essentially over, and while this means Canada is cut loose, it also liberates us from over-reliance on the U.S. military-industrial complex. This shift allows Canada to forge its own path in defence, enriched by diverse collaborations.

Posted in: Canada Tagged: "Golden Dome", 2025-11, 51st state, annexation, autonomy, Canada, Defence, Defense, Donald Trump, Europe, expo, huckster, Independence, Mark Carney, military, NATO, partnerships, Pete Hegseth, ReArm Europe, security, sovereignty

Tuesday May 27 2025

May 27, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

King Charles III's visit to Canada underscores the country's sovereignty and distinct identity amid geopolitical tensions with the U.S.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday May 27 2025

King Charles III’s visit to Canada underscores the country’s sovereignty and distinct identity amid geopolitical tensions with the U.S.

Canada’s Sovereign Stand Against U.S. Pressure

May 6, 2023

As King Charles III arrives in Canada for his first visit as monarch, the event is rich with meaning and strategic foresight. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s invitation for the King to deliver the Speech from the Throne is more than a ceremonial gesture; it’s a powerful assertion of Canada’s independence and distinct identity. This move comes at a time when U.S. President Donald Trump has been making dismissive remarks about Canada’s status, and it serves as a clear message that Canada stands proudly on its own.

When Carney was sworn in as Prime Minister, he described Canada as a country “built on the bedrock of three peoples: Indigenous, French, and British.” This statement captures the essence of Canada’s diverse heritage, highlighting a nation that neither leans towards American influence nor forgets its roots. By inviting King Charles III to read the Throne Speech, Carney underscores this foundation, setting a tone that is both inclusive and assertive.

Opinion: King Charles’s visit to Canada: A Commonwealth flex with an audience of one

Victoria Day takes on new significance as Canada reaffirms its sovereignty in response to U.S. rhetoric and diplomatic tensions.

May 17, 2025

Carney’s use of this royal visit as a diplomatic tool showcases his government’s approach to international relations. His first official trip to Paris, London, and Iqaluit mirrored this blend, reinforcing ties with France and the UK while acknowledging the crucial role of Indigenous communities within Canada. During his time in London, Carney extended the invitation to the King, who was eager to accept. This isn’t just about tradition; it’s about strengthening the bonds that link Canada to the Commonwealth and its constitutional monarchy.

The visit takes place at a critical time when Canada’s relationship with its southern neighbour is being tested. Trump’s repeated comments about Canada potentially becoming the 51st U.S. state have been met with widespread concern. In this context, the royal visit is a clear message to Trump—and the world—that Canada’s sovereignty is firm. It’s a symbolic gesture, reminding Trump that Canada’s path is its own.

BBC: King’s invitation to Canada sends a message to Trump – and the world

June 10, 2022

While the visit includes traditional ceremonies, like military honours and a ceremonial tree planting, it serves a deeper purpose. It highlights the ongoing role of the monarchy in Canada’s governance and its relevance today. Including Indigenous leaders and cultural elements reflects Canada’s commitment to reconciliation and acknowledging its diverse heritage.

Public opinion on the monarchy might be mixed, but the significance of this visit goes beyond individual views. It reaffirms Canada’s heritage and declares its future on the world stage. The monarchy, often seen as a relic, finds new relevance as a diplomatic tool in modern times. Carney’s actions show a keen understanding of the power of symbolism in global politics and the importance of defining a nation’s identity through its history and constitution.

News: Why King Charles’s upcoming visit to Canada is unprecedented in many ways

King Charles III’s visit to Canada is more than a ceremonial occasion; it’s a defining moment in Prime Minister Carney’s diplomatic strategy. It’s a bold statement of independence and a celebration of the diverse peoples that form Canada. As Trump watches, this royal visit serves as a reminder of Canada’s steadfast independence and commitment to its principles. This historic moment isn’t just about the past; it’s about a clear vision for the future, where Canada’s identity is proudly asserted on its own terms.

The Crown Reconsidered by The Graeme Gallery

Tuesday May 27 2025

Read on Substack


Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-10, Canada, Carney, ceremony, Commonwealth, diplomacy, diversity, Donald Trump, geopolitical, heritage, identity, Independence, King Charles III, Mark Carney, Monarchy, naughty corner, Queen Camilla, red chamber, Senate, sovereignty, Trump, U.S.

Wednesday April 30, 2025

April 30, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada elects Mark Carney to lead a minority government, signaling a rejection of Trump's influence and a commitment to national sovereignty.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 30, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

Canada’s Stand: Mark Carney vs. Trump’s Shadow

As Canada's election campaign nears its end, Trump's rhetoric and policies become pivotal in shaping voter perceptions of leaders Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney.

April 25, 2025

The recent Canadian federal election has unfolded against a backdrop of unprecedented political dynamics, driven largely by the influence of U.S. President Donald Trump. His aggressive rhetoric, including threats to annex Canada as the 51st state and the imposition of tariffs, became central issues that galvanized Canadian voters. In response, Canadians have made a decisive choice by electing Mark Carney’s Liberal Party to lead the nation, even if through a minority government.

This election result is not merely a rejection of Trump’s influence but also a testament to Canada’s resilience and commitment to its sovereignty. As the Guardian noted, “Trump’s chaotic threats won Mark Carney the Canadian election,” emphasizing how the external pressure from Trump galvanized voters around a leader who promised to stand firm.

Analysis: Trump’s chaotic threats won Mark Carney the Canadian election – but only just

Mark Carney leverages his dual role as Liberal leader and Prime Minister to address economic challenges and political dynamics, including a significant gender gap, in Canada's federal election.

April 12, 2025

Mark Carney, a former central banker, has stepped into the political arena with a wealth of experience in navigating global economic challenges. His leadership during this tumultuous period offers Canadians a sense of stability and competence. In his acceptance speech, Carney struck a combative tone, emphasizing that “President Trump is trying to break us so he can own us. That will never happen.” This clear stance resonates with Canadians’ desire to protect their national interests against external threats.

While the Liberals’ victory was not a sweeping mandate, it reflects a strategic choice by voters to support a leader who promises to defend Canada’s sovereignty. The New York Times highlighted that Carney’s campaign centred around resisting Trump’s menacing comments and tariffs, a message that clearly resonated with the electorate.

However, the minority government situation presents its own set of challenges. Carney will need to navigate a complex political landscape, relying on support from smaller parties to advance his legislative agenda. Yet, Carney’s track record as a central banker, accustomed to dealing with crises, positions him well to manage these challenges effectively.

NYT: Mark Carney’s Liberals Win Canada’s Election. Here Are 4 Takeaways

Paul Chiang's resignation amid controversy over foreign interference comments highlights leadership challenges for Mark Carney and the Liberal Party.

April 2, 2025

Voters’ rejection of Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party, which saw its fortunes wane as Trump’s influence grew, further underscores the Canadian electorate’s desire to distance itself from MAGA-style politics. The swift shift in political dynamics reflects a broader sentiment that Canada must define its path on its own terms, independent of external pressures.

As one reader commented, “We elected someone who is an adult and a true leader. And I am relieved and so grateful.” This sentiment captures the optimism many Canadians feel as they look to the future under Carney’s leadership. His plans to diversify Canada’s alliances and reduce reliance on U.S. trade further demonstrate a proactive approach to strengthening the nation’s position on the global stage.

In conclusion, while the path forward will require careful navigation of domestic and international challenges, Canada is well-positioned to face the threats posed by a Trump-led America. Under Mark Carney’s experienced and steady leadership, there is much for Canadians to feel optimistic about as they work towards a future defined by resilience, unity, and self-determination.

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-09, alliances, annexation, Canada, Donald Trump, election, Independence, leadership, Liberal Party, MAGA, Mark Carney, Minority, resilience, sovereignty, tariffs, unity

Saturday April 19, 2025

April 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Pierre Poilievre's plan to invoke the notwithstanding clause threatens Canadian democratic norms and sets a dangerous precedent for federal governance.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 19, 2025

Poilievre’s Notwithstanding Gamble: A Risky Precedent for Canada

The concerns regarding Pierre Poilievre's casual use of the Notwithstanding clause include the potential undermining of the balance of power, diminishing the importance of Charter rights, the risk of misuse and abuse, and setting a dangerous precedent for future governments.

May 4, 2024

In a political landscape increasingly characterized by divisive rhetoric and the erosion of democratic norms, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre’s pledge to invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a troubling signal. His proposal to use this powerful constitutional tool to impose consecutive life sentences for multiple murderers may tap into populist sentiments, but it sets a dangerous precedent that should disqualify him and his party from gaining the reins of power.

December 14, 2022

The notwithstanding clause, or Section 33 of the Charter, allows federal and provincial governments to override certain Charter rights temporarily. Traditionally, its use has been confined to provincial matters, such as Quebec’s secularism laws, where it has already sparked controversy. No Canadian Prime Minister has ever used this clause at the federal level, and for good reason. It represents an extraordinary measure intended for exceptional circumstances, not a tool for advancing populist agendas.

December 6, 2022

Poilievre’s willingness to be the first Prime Minister to wield this clause reflects a concerning alignment with tactics seen south of the border under Donald Trump. Trump’s efforts to undermine the judiciary and politicize the courts have led to a weakening of the checks and balances that are foundational to American democracy. Canadians should be wary of similar trends taking root here.

News: Poilievre’s pledge to use notwithstanding clause a ‘dangerous sign’: legal expert

Critics, including legal experts and political leaders, have voiced strong opposition to Poilievre’s plan. They warn that normalizing the use of the notwithstanding clause for routine legislative purposes could erode the Charter’s protections and lead to further politicization of fundamental rights. This slippery slope could extend beyond criminal justice, potentially threatening academic freedom, reproductive rights, and other areas where individual liberties might clash with political agendas.

Pierre Poilievre faces challenges adapting his strategy against the fresh leadership of Mark Carney, as Canada's political dynamics shift from opposition to unity.

March 15, 2025

Public sentiment, as reflected in reader comments and broader discourse, reveals deep apprehension about Poilievre’s intentions. The use of the notwithstanding clause is seen not only as an overreach but also as an indication of Poilievre’s authoritarian tendencies—a “trumpy” approach that prioritizes personal opinion over established legal norms. Such a path risks alienating those who value the rule of law and the independence of the judiciary.

News: Poilievre says he’ll use notwithstanding clause to ensure multiple-murderers die in prison

While both Trump and Poilievre use populist slogans and insults to galvanize supporters, Poilievre has thus far avoided Trump’s more extreme policies, opting to focus his populist messaging on economic concerns.

November 9 2024

Poilievre’s tough-on-crime rhetoric may resonate with certain voter bases, but the implications of his proposals extend far beyond immediate policy goals. They strike at the heart of Canada’s democratic values and the delicate balance of power that protects citizens’ rights. As we approach the upcoming election, it is crucial for Canadians to consider the long-term consequences of granting power to a leader willing to circumvent the Charter for political gain.

In a time when global democratic institutions face unprecedented challenges, Canada must stand firm in upholding its principles. Poilievre’s promise to invoke the notwithstanding clause is a stark reminder of the stakes at play. It is a promise that, if fulfilled, could fundamentally alter the landscape of Canadian governance. For this reason, it stands as yet another compelling argument.


“Notwithstanding Clause” no doubt instantly triggers eye glazing in vast swaths of Canadians, a nation where many voters remain unaware of its implications until they feel the impact firsthand. Pierre Poilievre, echoing Trump, is using populist outrage to justify potentially overriding judicial independence with the notwithstanding clause, signalling a troubling shift towards authoritarianism. What might have been seen as fear-mongering before an election becomes irrelevant once a movement takes power. When these accusations no longer trigger instinctive reactions, they solidify into harsh realities. Just look south for proof of this. Timbit Trump’s promise to enforce life sentences by bypassing court decisions raises concerns about future threats to constitutional rights, drawing unsettling parallels with recent U.S. politics. Today, Poilievre targets criminal sentencing, but despite denying admiration for Trump, he emulates many strategies from the Trump playbook, suggesting he might next challenge academic freedom, women’s rights, or other constitutional protections. This commitment to undermining judicial independence to consolidate power is the pivotal issue of this election, as it echoes the U.S. pattern of filling the judiciary with like-minded judges and defying court rulings, reflecting a desire to centralize authority. Sure, just what democracy ordered: another leader eager to override court decisions with his own, thanks to the trusty notwithstanding clause. Vote for this at your peril.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 19, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

YouTube: Easter Bunny Rejection  https://youtu.be/jDyQEaocYGc

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-08, authoritarian, Canada, Charter, clause, Democracy, Donald Trump, Easter, easter bunny, election, federal, freedoms, governance, Independence, Judiciary, justice, Lady Justice, Notwithstanding, overreach, Pierre Poilievre, populist, precedent, rights, Substack

Thursday March 20, 2025

March 20, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Canada must reconsider its reliance on the U.S. for defence as geopolitical tensions and procurement challenges prompt a strategic reassessment.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 20, 2025

Also Published in the Toronto Star.

Canada’s Defense Dilemma: Rethinking Reliance on Uncle Sam

January 11, 2023

For many years after World War II, Canada counted on the United States as a reliable ally, keeping our borders safe and secure. This close bond, strengthened by common values and strong trade ties, allowed Canada to focus on other important issues while relying on American military power. However, the world has changed a lot, and recent events make it clear that Canada needs to rethink how much it relies on the U.S. for defence.

News: Canada reconsidering F-35 purchase amid tensions with Washington, says minister

July 19, 2010

The presidency of Donald Trump has put a strain on this long-standing friendship. His administration’s lack of respect for trade agreements, like the USMCA, and the introduction of tough trade tariffs have put a dent in our economic relationship. On top of that, Trump’s unsettling comments about Canada becoming the “51st state” and his friendly stance towards leaders like Vladimir Putin add to the complexity. In this uncertain environment, Canada must carefully navigate its defence and security policies.

A major issue at hand is Canada’s plan to buy F-35 fighter jets, which has sparked a lot of debate. While these jets are meant to modernize Canada’s aging air fleet, relying on U.S.-controlled technology poses risks. The possibility that a future U.S. administration could deny necessary software updates for political reasons highlights the danger of depending too heavily on one supplier.

September 11, 2012

Canada must look at other options for defence partnerships and diversify where it gets its military equipment. The Swedish Gripen, for example, offers benefits like local assembly and less reliance on U.S. maintenance. This could help boost Canada’s defence industry and increase our independence. Building stronger defence ties with other friendly nations could give Canada the flexibility it needs in a changing world.

News: Canada must weigh risk Trump blocks software upgrades for F-35s: former official

October 2, 2014

While it’s important to keep a cooperative relationship with the U.S., Canada also needs to be ready for a less friendly neighbour. This means finding a balance between working together and being independent, ensuring Canada can protect itself if needed. Strengthening our own defence capabilities and investing in homegrown technology should be priorities to keep us safe.

In short, Canada is at a turning point in its defence strategy. We need to carefully consider the current global situation, our economic interests, and our national security needs. By broadening our defence partnerships and reducing our reliance on any single ally, Canada can better protect its sovereignty and security in these unpredictable times.


I’ve put together an editorial cartoon that captures the current state of Canada’s defence strategy, inspired by the topsy-turvy dynamics of our relationship with the U.S. Picture an F-35 flying upside down—a nod to “Top Gun.”

With Donald Trump’s disregard for trade agreements like the USMCA and his cozying up to figures like Putin, it’s clear Canada can’t fully depend on the U.S. as a reliable ally as we once did. Yet, cooperation is still necessary, even amid rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state.

It’s a tough balancing act. We need to decide whether to continue feeding the military-industrial complex or explore new partnerships beyond the usual U.S. ties. The cartoon aims to spark some reflection on how Canada can best navigate these challenges.

Please enjoy my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 20, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-06, alliance, Canada, Defence, diversification, Donald Trump, F-35, Gripen, Independence, Mark Carney, partnership, procurement, security, software, sovereignty, strategy, Substack, terms and conditions, United States
1 2 3 Next »

Please note…

This website contains satirical commentaries of current events going back several decades. Some readers may not share this sense of humour nor the opinions expressed by the artist. To understand editorial cartoons it is important to understand their effectiveness as a counterweight to power. It is presumed readers approach satire with a broad minded foundation and healthy knowledge of objective facts of the subjects depicted.

  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Toronto Star
  • The Globe & Mail
  • The National Post
  • Graeme on T̶w̶i̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶(̶X̶)̶
  • Graeme on F̶a̶c̶e̶b̶o̶o̶k̶
  • Graeme on T̶h̶r̶e̶a̶d̶s̶
  • Graeme on Instagram
  • Graeme on Substack
  • Graeme on Bluesky
  • Graeme on Pinterest
  • Graeme on YouTube
New and updated for 2025
  • HOME
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • The Boutique
  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Association of Canadian Cartoonists
  • The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists
  • You Might be From Hamilton if…
  • Young Doug Ford
  • MacKay’s Most Viral Cartoon
  • Intellectual Property Thief Donkeys
  • Wes Tyrell
  • Martin Rowson
  • Guy Bado’s Blog
  • National Newswatch
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design

Brand New Designs!

Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Archives

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial
 

Loading Comments...