influence – mackaycartoons

Tuesday June 10 2025

June 10, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 10 2025

Canada’s Bold Move: Strengthening Defense Amid Global Pressures

May 7, 2025

This week, Canada has taken a significant step in shaping its defence strategy as Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a $9 billion investment in military spending, with a commitment to meet NATO’s 2% GDP target this year. This decision reflects Canada’s dedication to strengthening its military capabilities in response to rising global tensions, particularly from countries like Russia and China, which have been expanding their military power. These challenges necessitate a robust defence posture from Canada.

News: Carney to announce Canada’s defence spending will hit NATO’s target of 2% of GDP this fiscal year, sources say

At the same time, Canada’s move is influenced by ongoing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has been vocal about NATO allies increasing their defence budgets. Trump’s focus on military might is evident not only on the world stage but also at home, with his use of the National Guard to address protests and the upcoming military parade for his birthday. These actions highlight the expectation that allies like Canada share the burden of defence spending.

January 16, 2020

Interestingly, the pressure from Trump seems to echo the tactics used by leaders like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, who often wield their influence through displays of strength. For Canada, aligning with these demands means finding a balance between meeting international obligations and looking after national interests. Carney’s investment is not just a reaction to outside pressures; it’s a strategic move to ensure that Canada remains a capable and committed player on the global stage.

News: NATO to back 5% spending target in June, Secretary-General says

By focusing on enhancing military readiness and boosting the Canadian defence industry, Carney’s government aims to secure Canada’s future while maintaining its independence. This includes reforms in military procurement and the use of domestic resources like Canadian steel and aluminum, reducing reliance on the U.S., and strengthening ties with European allies.

As Canada takes this path, it’s important to support policies that reflect our values and commitment to security. This investment in defence will help ensure that Canada remains respected and influential in a world where power displays are on the rise.

A few thoughts about where we stand with our international security commitments. It’s no secret that Canada has been lagging in this area for a while now.

Our self-defence capabilities have weakened to the point where it’s hard to see how we can be a credible force in helping defend others when we can barely defend ourselves.

That said, I’m looking at Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent commitments with a lot of hope. I’m cautiously optimistic about this new leadership and what it could mean for our defence posture. It’s definitely about results at this point, and I’m hoping Carney can deliver.

It’s interesting timing, isn’t it? Just ahead of the G7 meeting we’re hosting and right before the big NATO summit where talk of spending is heating up from 2% to 5%. And let’s not forget, it’s Trump’s birthday week, culminating in that over-the-top military parade. It feels like we’re all putting on a bit of a show right now.

Friday April 11, 2025

April 11, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 11, 2025 (Also, The Toronto Star, April 13, 2025)

A Circus of Chaos and Consequences

April 10, 2025

In the annals of American leadership, few figures have managed to blend showmanship with governance quite like Donald Trump. Touting himself as the mastermind behind “The Art of the Deal,” Trump promised to harness his negotiating prowess to fortify the U.S. economy and elevate its standing on the global stage. Yet, as recent events have painfully demonstrated, Trump’s leadership style has proven less an art form and more a chaotic spectacle, reminiscent of a ratings-dropping game show rather than strategic statecraft.

Opinion: What Trump Just Cost America

Trump’s recent decision to impose and then abruptly pause tariffs, excluding China, has not only destabilized markets but shattered trust in American leadership. Announcing a 90-day pause, Trump expected foreign leaders to flock to his door, eager to negotiate. Instead, as Thomas L. Friedman of The New York Times aptly noted, his actions have echoed the old adage: if you hire clowns, expect a circus.

The administration’s rationale for these tariffs — from curbing fentanyl to funding tax cuts — fluctuated as erratically as the stock market during his tenure. Trump’s so-called principles crumbled under pressure, revealing a strategy not rooted in sound economic theory but in impulse-driven theatrics. The result? A loss of billions and an even more invaluable currency: trust.

Opinion: America is lost. But we can still save the rest of the world from Trump’s tariffs

April 3, 2025

In one fell swoop, Trump equated long-standing allies with adversaries like China and Russia, applying tariffs indiscriminately and disregarding decades of partnership. Countries that stood shoulder to shoulder with the U.S. in moments of global crisis were left questioning their alliance with a nation that seemed to value spectacle over substance.

Friedman likened this diplomatic blunder to the Biden administration’s withdrawal from Afghanistan — a strategic misstep that Trump’s tariffs have now emulated in the trade arena. Yet, unlike Afghanistan, this self-imposed trade war has no exit strategy, leaving America isolated at a time when unity is paramount.

Trump’s approach to China, a nation with vast manufacturing capabilities, was a tactical misfire. Rather than rallying global allies to address trade imbalances collaboratively, Trump went it alone, fostering animosity instead of alliance. Friedman highlights this failure to unite against a common economic rival as a critical error, strengthening Beijing’s position while allies now view China as a more stable partner than the unpredictable U.S.

News: Trump’s Encouragement of Stock Investors Draws Scrutiny

March 26, 2025

The Trump era’s hallmark is not economic resurgence but rather a profound erosion of American values and influence. His administration’s apparent disregard for ethical governance has fueled suspicions of market manipulation and insider trading, with allegations, as Friedman points out, that Trump’s inner circle profited from his policy pivots. Such actions, if proven, would underscore a presidency marred by self-interest and oligarchic tendencies.

In the end, Trump’s “Art of the Deal” narrative unfolds more like an episode of “Let’s Make a Deal,” where the stakes are not merely ratings but the very credibility and leadership of the United States. As the curtain falls on this chapter of American policymaking, the world grapples with a sobering reality: faith in American leadership has been not just shaken, but shattered.

As America navigates the aftermath of Trump’s tenure, it must work tirelessly to rebuild the bridges burned by his reckless policies. This requires a commitment to transparency, ethical governance, and strategic alliances that prioritize collective prosperity over individual gain. Only then can the U.S. hope to restore its standing as a leader not just in power, but in principle.

Pardon the Conspiracy theory But… As I’ve been reading through various articles and the comments sections, one thing is clear: the idea of insider trading is dominating people’s minds. Many are questioning who might have been tipped off about the reversal. It feels eerily similar to the 2008 scenario, with concerns about how many people panicked and sold low, only for a select few to profit when the market surged.

The opinion pieces aren’t holding back either, pointing out how Trump’s actions have not only wiped out investments but also eroded trust in the system. It’s frustrating to see such recklessness from someone in charge, and the lack of transparency and accountability is a real concern.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 11, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday March 25, 2025

March 25, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday March 25, 2025

Playing the Trump Card: A Conservative Gamble

January 13, 2025

The first week of the 2025 federal election has been anything but smooth for the Conservative Party, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s recent actions and comments have cast an unwelcome spotlight on the party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre. Her controversial request to the Trump administration to pause tariffs until after the Canadian election has not only raised eyebrows but has also thrown a wrench into the Conservatives’ campaign strategy.

News: Danielle Smith tells U.S. podcast she asked Trump administration to pause tariffs to bolster Conservatives

January 17, 2025

Smith’s actions, perceived by many as an invitation for foreign interference in Canadian politics, have drawn widespread criticism. Her alignment with Donald Trump, underscored by her visit to Mar-a-Lago and attendance at Trump’s inauguration, plays the “Trump card,” bending the narrative of her loyalty and fuelling concerns about a lack of commitment to Canadian interests. In a time when unity and a cohesive national strategy are paramount, Smith’s independent approach undermines the collective “Team Canada” stance that both provincial and federal leaders strive to present.

Opinion: Canada, May I Introduce You to Ukraine?

March 21, 2025

Trump’s penchant for describing perceived weakness as not “holding the cards” is particularly relevant here. By aligning with Trump, Smith may inadvertently align with this narrative of vulnerability, casting doubts on her and Poilievre’s ability to lead with strength and independence. This association could paint the Conservatives as lacking the strategic “cards” needed to effectively govern and protect Canadian interests.

For Pierre Poilievre, this association with Trump-like politics is a significant hurdle. As he attempts to broaden his appeal to a diverse electorate, Smith’s comments and actions risk reinforcing a narrative that ties him closely to Trump—a narrative that could alienate moderate and swing voters who are wary of such connections. Poilievre’s reluctance to distance himself from Smith’s remarks only complicates his efforts to rebrand the Conservative Party and distance it from the divisive politics of the past.

Opinion: Danielle Smith’s Trump talk threatens Pierre Poilievre’s chances to win

March 15, 2025

Liberal Leader Mark Carney has capitalized on this situation, emphasizing the need for a unified government that stands firm for Canada. This contrast between Carney’s vision and the discord within the Conservative ranks could prove pivotal in swaying undecided voters. The controversy surrounding Smith provides the Liberals with a powerful narrative to question the Conservatives’ commitment to Canadian sovereignty and unity.

As the election progresses, the Conservatives face the daunting task of addressing these challenges head-on. Poilievre must navigate the delicate balance of retaining support from his conservative base while reaching out to a broader audience. He needs to clearly articulate his vision for Canada, one that resonates with voters seeking stability and leadership untainted by foreign influence.

February 9, 2024

The first week of the 2025 federal election has not gone as planned for the Conservatives. Danielle Smith’s missteps have cast a long shadow, complicating Pierre Poilievre’s path to victory. As the campaign unfolds, the Conservatives must work tirelessly to overcome this narrative and present a united front that truly reflects Canadian values and priorities. Whether they can successfully pivot from this challenging start remains to be seen, but the stakes have never been higher.

A Trump Card Gag

More than a decade has passed since Donald Trump took that infamous elevator ride, launching himself into the arena of politics. In all those years, amidst the countless headlines, debates, and controversies, I’ve managed to avoid the temptation of making a “Trump card” gag—until now. The alignment of Danielle Smith with Trump has created the first major gaffe of the Canadian election campaign, sparking controversy and certainly causing some behind-the-scenes fury between Smith and Pierre Poilievre. Her comments have undoubtedly complicated his efforts to steer the Conservative Party away from divisive politics – as in a reputation. Of being a Timbit Trump leading a Maple MAGA cult. It seems that, whether in politics or wordplay, timing is everything, and this particular moment has finally provided the perfect scenario for this metaphor.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday March 6, 2025

March 6, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 6, 2025

“America is Back” – A Return to What?

January 21, 2025

The declaration of “America is back” by President Donald Trump rings through the halls of power with a resonance that’s both reassuring to some and disconcerting to others. But as we delve deeper into his policies and the current state of the nation, a pressing question arises: Back to what, precisely? The rhetoric suggests a return to greatness, yet the reality paints a picture that seems to harken back to an era less democratic and more autocratic.

Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China has been described by The Economist as an unexpected upheaval, causing a ripple of economic isolationism reminiscent of the protectionist policies of the late 19th century. Readers of The Globe and Mail express concern that these actions dismantle decades of progress toward free trade that the U.S. once championed. The United States, a founding figure in reducing global trade barriers through agreements like GATT and the WTO, now appears to be retreating to a time when tariffs were the norm rather than the exception.

News: A Combative Trump Says ‘America Is Back’ and Taunts His Political Rivals

February 7, 2025

The editorial from The Globe and Mail paints a picture of a U.S. pivoting away from its Western allies towards the arms of the Kremlin. This shift raises questions about America’s role as a reliable ally in the post-war era, a period when it provided security and leadership against totalitarianism. Reader comments reflect unease over the abandonment of long-held security guarantees and the potential fallout for global stability. The U.S. seems to be distancing itself from the very alliances it helped to build, suggesting a return to an era of isolationism and unilateralism.

Domestically, Trump’s administration is characterized by significant upheaval, with an unelected billionaire like Elon Musk reportedly wielding power to fire civil servants. The concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals and the erosion of institutional norms evoke a time before the robust checks and balances established by the founding fathers. Reader comments express fears of a permanent alteration in governance, with democracy itself appearing to be under threat.

February 4, 2025

Trump’s rhetoric of annexing territories and embracing former adversaries echoes imperial expansionism. The notion of America “being back” might conjure images of a time when nations were led by divine kings, wielding unchecked power and pursuing imperial ambitions. This raises the question of whether Trump’s vision aligns with the democratic ideals and international cooperation that have long defined American leadership.

Opinion: Pax Americana is over. Donald Trump killed it

As Trump declares “America is back,” the question remains: Back to what historical period does he refer? Is it a return to economic isolationism, diplomatic withdrawal, and centralized power reminiscent of monarchies? For a nation that once stood as a beacon of democracy and global leadership, the current trajectory seems at odds with the principles that have guided it for over two centuries.

February 6, 2019

In this context, the call for vigilance and reflection becomes imperative. Understanding what “America is back” truly means is crucial for the nation and the world, as the implications of this rhetoric reverberate across borders and generations. The path forward must reconcile the nation’s historical ideals with the challenges and complexities of the modern world.

America is back (To c1534)

Just wrapped up another day at the drawing board, capturing the political scene. If you know my work, you’ll recall my detailed chart of English and British monarchs. In the Trump 2.0 era, though he’s been in power just six weeks, I’ve already illustrated him in royal attire a few times.

U.S. history has seen presidents compared to overbearing kings when they veer from the essence of a presidency, rooted in the republic’s founding ideals. Yet here we are with Donald Trump, the “anti-President,” echoing the Vatican’s anti-popes and Oliver Cromwell’s flirtation with kingship. Trump, who seems to relish the company of monarchs and dictators, has expressed his kingly aspirations openly.

What’s more, his followers are urging him to break term limits and push for a third term, a notion that challenges the legitimacy of democratic elections. It’s as if Trump and his circle of enablers have forgotten that a U.S. President isn’t meant to play king. With MAGA’s fealty and his grand rhetoric about territories, when Trump says “America is Back,” it feels like a nod to Tudor times

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 6, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday February 5, 2025

February 5, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Wednesday February 5, 2025

(First published in The Hamilton Spectator, October 2, 2020)

America First, Allies Last

February 5, 2025

Under President Trump’s second term, American leadership on the global stage is experiencing significant challenges. With an “America First” stance, the administration has prioritized national interests over global collaboration, resulting in strained relationships with allies like Canada and contentious tariff negotiations. This shift reflects a departure from traditional U.S. foreign policy, leading to concerns about the erosion of America’s moral and diplomatic influence.

In the Middle East, Trump’s proposal to transform the Gaza Strip into a luxury destination, without considering the desires of the Palestinian people, exemplifies a unilateral approach that risks exacerbating regional tensions. Such actions suggest an exercise of American imperialism, overlooking the complexities of international conflicts.

November 14, 2017

Historically, the U.S. has been a beacon of democracy and freedom, but the current trajectory signals a withdrawal from these responsibilities. The fading perception of American leadership is prompting allies and adversaries to adjust their strategies, potentially leaving a void in global leadership.

In this uncertain era, it’s vital for the U.S. to reaffirm its commitment to democratic values and international cooperation. The world watches to see if America will reclaim its role as a leader in shaping a just and equitable global order, or continue down a path of isolation and diminished influence. The future of global leadership and American exceptionalism hangs in the balance.

This editorial cartoon has been repurposed after being first published October 2, 2020.