infrastructure

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 21 2025

Ford and Trump: Economic Growth at Environment’s Cost

In a striking political maneuver, Doug Ford secured a third term as Ontario’s Premier by channeling public outrage against Donald Trump and his tariff policies. This strategy, while effective at the polls, has obscured a more profound and troubling similarity between Ford and Trump: a shared devotion to economic development that disregards environmental sustainability and, arguably, the very reality of climate change.

NYT Opinion: The U.S. Under Trump: Alone in Its Climate Denial

Ford’s recent legislative actions and budgetary decisions echo the deregulatory zeal that characterized Trump’s presidency. Both leaders have prioritized immediate economic growth, often through support for traditional energy sectors and infrastructure projects, over long-term environmental stewardship.

Bill 5, a legislative proposal under Ford’s government, seeks to create “special economic zones” that bypass established environmental regulations and Indigenous consultation processes. This move mirrors Trump’s efforts to roll back federal environmental protections in favour of accelerating industrial projects. Critics argue that such policies represent a short-sighted approach, undermining ecological safeguards and social equity in pursuit of rapid economic gains.

Environmentalists and Indigenous leaders have voiced strong opposition, warning that Bill 5 could lead to the destruction of habitats and erosion of constitutionally protected rights. The Toronto Star’s coverage highlights the potential for this legislation to concentrate power within the provincial cabinet, enabling decisions that may favour private interests over public good—a hallmark of the Trump administration’s approach to governance.

The Narwhal’s analysis of Ontario’s budget reveals further parallels. Despite recent extreme weather events, Ford’s government has opted to cut funding for emergency preparedness and forest firefighting. Instead, the focus remains on building highways and expanding mining in the Ring of Fire, areas rich in critical minerals but fraught with ecological and social concerns.

The Narwal: Ontario budget weighs tariff threats, ignores climate threat

This emphasis on infrastructure expansion at the expense of environmental considerations is reminiscent of Trump’s prioritization of fossil fuel projects and infrastructure over climate action. Both leaders seem to view environmental regulations as obstacles to economic progress rather than essential safeguards for future generations.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent dismissal of climate change as a pressing issue. Ford’s policies, much like Trump’s, lack a comprehensive strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or address the root causes of climate change. The reliance on fossil fuels has increased under both administrations, reversing progress made in previous years and contributing to higher emissions.

Ford’s budget cuts to environmental programs and resistance to sustainable transport solutions, such as bike lanes and public transit expansion, further underscore a disconnect between economic policies and environmental realities. This approach risks leaving Ontario—and indeed the world—ill-prepared for the escalating impacts of climate change.

The Toronto Star: Ford government denies bill to speed up development will override environmental and Indigenous concerns

The Greenbelt controversy, which plagued Ford’s government, serves as a glaring example of the administration’s failure to learn from its mistakes. Despite public outcry and legal challenges over attempts to develop protected lands, the government continues to pursue similar policies that prioritize development over conservation. This pattern of behavior suggests a persistent disregard for environmental sustainability and public trust.

While Ford’s political strategy of leveraging external threats like Trump’s tariffs may win elections, it cannot mask the fundamental need for a balanced approach to development. Economic prosperity and environmental sustainability are not mutually exclusive; they must be pursued in tandem to ensure a viable future.

Substack: Donald Trump: Dirtiest U.S. President Ever

Both Ford and Trump have demonstrated a penchant for policies that prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term ecological health. As voters and citizens, it is crucial to demand leadership that recognizes and addresses the intertwined challenges of economic development and environmental stewardship. Only then can we hope to achieve a sustainable and equitable future for all.

---

---