Israel – mackaycartoons

Saturday June 14, 2025

June 14, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 14, 2025

Breaking the Cycle of Escalating Violence in the Middle East

December 10, 2024

The Middle East stands on the precipice of a conflict escalation not seen in decades, as Israel’s recent military actions against Iran’s nuclear facilities and top military leaders threaten to ignite a broader regional war. This is not merely another chapter in the long-standing saga of animosity between Israel and Iran, but a moment of heightened tension that necessitates immediate de-escalation efforts.

For outside observers, Israel’s right to defend itself against existential threats is unquestionable, particularly when faced with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. The fear of a nuclear-armed Iran has long been a driving force behind Israel’s military strategies, and its recent actions are a testament to its commitment to neutralizing threats before they materialize. Israel’s sophisticated military operations, such as the high-tech assault on Hezbollah, demonstrate its capability and willingness to act decisively.

News: Israel attacks Iran’s nuclear facilities, kills top military leaders

Tuesday October 7, 2024

However, the conflict’s human toll cannot be ignored. Israel’s response to Hamas following the October 7, 2023, attacks on Israelis—while rooted in a need for security—has disproportionately affected Palestinian civilians, leading to immense suffering and international criticism. The humanitarian cost of these actions raises moral and ethical questions about the balance between self-defence and the protection of innocent lives.

The current situation is further complicated by global dynamics. The U.S., under President Donald Trump, has distanced itself from direct involvement, yet its historical alliance with Israel positions it as a key player in this proxy conflict. The risk of drawing the U.S. into a direct confrontation with Iran looms large, with potential global repercussions.

Opinion: Striking the Heart of the Iranian Regime, Netanyahu Looks to His Legacy

What makes this scenario particularly alarming is the leadership at the helm. Both President Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have shown tendencies toward prioritizing personal pride and political gain over measured, diplomatic approaches. Their leadership styles—marked by unpredictability and a penchant for bold, unilateral actions—do not inspire confidence in their ability to navigate such a volatile situation with the necessary level-headedness.

September 28, 2024

Compounding this is the unpredictable nature of Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah, whose regime’s aggressive posturing and support for proxy groups like Hamas and Hezbollah have been central to the region’s instability. The confluence of these leadership dynamics creates a precarious situation where rational dialogue is overshadowed by the pursuit of power and influence.

In this complex and dangerous environment, the priority must be de-escalation. The international community must rally to mediate and foster dialogue between the key players, emphasizing the humanitarian imperative and the severe consequences of continued violence. Efforts to revive diplomatic negotiations with Iran, potentially involving neutral third parties, are essential to addressing the root causes of the conflict, particularly the nuclear issue.

News: U.S. distances itself from Israel’s attack, warns Iran not to retailiate

Ultimately, breaking the cycle of violence requires visionary leadership that prioritizes peace over pride, and diplomacy over destruction. The stakes have never been higher, and the cost of inaction or miscalculation could reverberate far beyond the region, affecting global stability and security. It is time for the world to unite in a concerted effort to steer the Middle East away from the brink and toward a future where peace is not just a distant hope, but a tangible reality.

Wednesday October 2, 2024

October 8, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday October 8, 2024

Animated making-of clip here!

A Year After October 7: The Dead End of Hamas’s Brutality and the World’s Inaction

September 28, 2024

As we mark the first anniversary of Hamas’s brutal assault on Israel, it is impossible to overstate the devastating consequences of that attack—not just for the Israelis and Palestinians but for the broader goal of peace in the Middle East. In his recent essay, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman forcefully condemned Hamas’s actions on October 7, calling them not only indefensible but also a severe setback to any hopes for a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He is right. Hamas’s violence, fuelled by hatred and driven by no goal other than destruction, has shattered any glimmers of hope for the long-term solution that should be the only acceptable outcome: two states for two peoples, living side by side in dignity and peace.

Thomas L. Friedman: What I’m Thinking About on the First Anniversary of the War

The attack, in which Hamas brutally murdered, kidnapped, and terrorized Israeli civilians, was horrific. It left communities devastated, families shattered, and deepened the abyss of mutual mistrust and hostility. But beyond the raw brutality, what is particularly tragic is how much this act has set back the cause of Palestinian statehood—the very cause Hamas claims to represent. By engaging in terrorism rather than constructive diplomacy, Hamas not only reignited Israel’s fury but also reinforced global skepticism about the possibility of a peaceful Palestinian leadership emerging in Gaza.

March 20, 2024

For decades, the two-state solution has been seen by many, including Friedman and countless international diplomats, as the only viable path to peace. Yet Hamas’s actions have pushed that vision further out of reach. It was a strategic blunder as much as it was a moral atrocity, handing Israel the justification to retaliate with overwhelming force and to focus on military victory rather than any long-term political solution.

And what of the innocent civilians on both sides? The war has inflicted untold suffering on ordinary people, caught in the crossfire of this seemingly endless conflict. In Israel, families live in constant fear of rocket attacks. In Gaza, civilians—women, children, the elderly—are paying the price for Hamas’s decision to embed itself in residential areas, hospitals, and schools. Gaza’s residents, already living in crippling poverty and under blockade, have been subjected to unimaginable horrors. Hospitals have been bombed, neighbourhoods reduced to rubble, and the humanitarian crisis has worsened by the day. Israel’s military actions, aimed at Hamas, have also caused widespread civilian casualties, deepening the despair of a people who have already suffered for far too long.

Yet as Friedman rightly points out, Israel, too, bears responsibility for its inability to offer a vision for Gaza beyond “total victory” over Hamas. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government has pursued a war strategy that, without a plan for what comes next, risks turning Gaza into an eternal battlefield. The relentless bombing of schools and homes to kill a few militants is not a long-term solution, and it only solidifies Israel’s image as a brutal occupier in the eyes of much of the world. Without articulating a vision for peace—a real future for the Palestinians who live in Gaza—Israel will never be able to claim victory in the broader battle for the moral high ground.

October 20, 2023

The international community, for its part, has failed miserably in its responsibility to broker peace and end the senselessness. For a year, global leaders have stood by, wringing their hands while the violence escalates, incapable or unwilling to step in and demand a cease-fire, negotiate a viable solution, or impose any meaningful consequences for war crimes. The United States, under President Biden, has sent mixed messages—offering tepid warnings to Israel while continuing to supply weapons. Meanwhile, Europe, once a voice for human rights, has largely remained silent as Gaza burns. The global community’s dysfunction and impotence are a tragedy of their own, enabling the continuation of violence and suffering.

News: War rages on multiple fronts as Israel marks a year since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack

Friedman also touches on a darker undercurrent in Israeli politics: Prime Minister Netanyahu’s apparent interest in prolonging the war to serve his own political needs. Facing corruption charges, Netanyahu has used the conflict to delay his day in court and to bolster his standing with his far-right allies, who demand total victory and the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank. This political calculus, combined with a lack of coherent strategy, risks dragging Israel into a perpetual cycle of violence, one in which neither peace nor security can ever be fully achieved.

October 14, 2023

This anniversary is a grim reminder of what happens when extremism, short-term thinking, and cynical political maneuvering drive policy instead of a genuine commitment to peace. Hamas, with its embrace of terror and rejection of diplomacy, has done as much harm to the Palestinian cause as it has to Israeli civilians. Meanwhile, Israel’s military response, unchecked by the international community and lacking any clear endgame, has deepened the suffering of Palestinians and alienated the global moral support it once relied on.

But there is a way forward—if only the world will seize it. As Friedman suggests, the key lies in rebuilding a legitimate Palestinian partner for peace, one that is capable of leading Gaza and the West Bank toward statehood. The Palestinian Authority, despite its flaws, remains the only viable alternative to Hamas. Israel must support its reform and empower it to govern Gaza, as part of a broader vision of two states. At the same time, the international community must pressure Israel to halt settlement expansion and recognize that permanent occupation and endless war will never bring security or peace.

It is a bitter irony that, one year after the October 7 attacks, the future seems bleaker than ever for both Israelis and Palestinians. But it does not have to be this way. There is still a path toward peace, if leaders on all sides are willing to take it. That path, however, requires an end to violence, an end to cynicism, and a renewed commitment to the only solution that can ever bring lasting justice and security: two states for two peoples, living side by side. Anything less is not just a failure of leadership—it is a failure of humanity. (AI)

Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Wednesday October 9, 2024

Cartoon an ‘inversion of reality’

October 9, 2024 letter

Graeme Mackay’s Oct. 8 cartoon depicted Israel’s prime minister fighting over a dove with Iran’s ayatollah, standing over a mountain of bones. This caricature drew an obscene moral equivalence.

One year ago, Hamas (an Iranian-backed terrorist proxy), launched the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. The next day, Hezbollah, another Iranian proxy, began firing 10,000 rockets indiscriminately into Israel. Soon the Houthis in Yemen and other groups allied with Iran joined in. All of them are sworn to Israel’s destruction.

And yet Israel — for refusing to lie down and die — is put in the same category as the genocidal maniacs who seek to destroy it, and whose followers have been rampaging on our streets for a year? This is akin to showing Hitler and Churchill fighting over a mountain of graves and is an absolute inversion of reality.

Robert Walker, assistant director, Honest Reporting Canada

Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Thursday October 10, 2024

Innocents caught in the crossfire
Re: Cartoon an ‘inversion of reality’ Oct. 9

October 10, 2024

Graeme MacKay’s Oct. 8 cartoon depicted the reality of what is now happening in Gaza and the West Bank. What happened on Oct. 7, 2023, is pure horror for the people of Israel and for Jews around the world. As for how it was allowed to happen, the Israeli people deserve an honest answer.

For Israel, when it comes to defending its people, that is totally understandable. What the gentleman from HonestReporting Canada has failed to see is, peace is something that is earned. In all honesty whether it is Hamas, an extremely violent terrorist group, or prime minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu — both have caused the deaths of thousands of innocent people. The failure to see what has happened to these people is unconscionable.

Margo May Taylor, Ancaster

Saturday September 28, 2024

October 1, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday September 28, 2024

Animated making-of clip here!

Netanyahu’s Escalation Risks Broader Conflict While Peace Remains Abandoned

December 20, 2023

Thomas L. Friedman’s recent analysis of the Israel-Hezbollah-Hamas-Iran conflict in The New York Times frames the issue as part of a global battle between a “coalition of inclusion” and a “coalition of resistance,” with Israel standing at a critical junction. While this perspective offers a compelling geopolitical narrative, it glosses over key realities on the ground. As Benjamin Netanyahu’s military offensive expands from Gaza to Lebanon, it seems less about securing peace and more about consolidating power through the elimination of key leadership figures in Hamas and Hezbollah. The harsh humanitarian toll and the escalating risks of broader regional conflict suggest a more dangerous path—one where peace is sidelined and devastation deepens.

Opinion: What This Israel-Hezbollah-Hamas-Iran Conflict is Really About

October 14, 2023

The insightful reporting by Ben Hubbard and Alissa J. Rubin in The New York Times vividly documents the devastating impact of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The relentless bombardment, aimed at dismantling Hamas leadership, has destroyed civilian infrastructure, flattened entire neighbourhoods, and displaced thousands. This is not a fight that ends with the death of key leaders; instead, it’s a cycle that perpetuates destruction, creating a new generation of anger and despair among Palestinians. As Friedman correctly notes, Netanyahu’s military campaign against Iran’s proxies is framed as part of a larger international conflict, but it’s also clear that this strategy is profoundly damaging to those living under fire.

Analysis: Facing a Big Test, Iran’s ‘Axis of Resistance’ Flails

Hubbard and Rubin emphasize the cost of this war not only in terms of lives lost but in the complete collapse of basic services and governance in Gaza. Hospitals are overwhelmed, water supplies are compromised, and electricity is scarce. Civilians bear the brunt of a war in which they have little say, caught between the militant tactics of Hamas and the overwhelming military power of Israel. Netanyahu’s military strategy may succeed in taking down Hamas leaders, but at the cost of eroding any prospects for a peaceful future in the region.

October 20, 2023

Netanyahu’s widening offensive in Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah in the north, risks expanding the humanitarian catastrophe beyond Gaza. Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah, now killed in an Israeli strike, was seen as a destabilizing force, but his death, like the toppling of Hamas leadership, is unlikely to bring about the peace Israel claims to be fighting for. As Hubbard and Rubin detail, the fear in Lebanon is palpable. The nation is already teetering on the edge of collapse due to its political paralysis, economic crisis, and a vast influx of refugees. Further destabilization from Israeli military actions could push Lebanon into outright disaster, echoing the ruin seen in Gaza.

Reader comments on Friedman’s analysis rightly point out the complexities Israel faces. One reader highlighted the entanglement of Israel’s military leadership with its far-right settler movement. Many high-ranking Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) officers come from these settlements, complicating any move toward a two-state solution or territorial concessions. The settlements—long supported by Netanyahu’s government—are not just political bargaining chips; they are deeply entrenched in Israel’s defence and security infrastructure. As one reader argued, Israel may be stuck in a “bear trap” of its own making. Any serious disengagement from the occupied territories risks not only international fallout but potential civil unrest within Israel itself.

November 10, 2023

The parallels Friedman draws between Israel’s regional struggle and the broader post-Cold War global order are illuminating but ultimately incomplete. While Israel is fighting proxies of Iran, Russia’s war in Ukraine is driven by similar attempts to resist Western inclusion. Yet, as one reader commented, America itself seems to be straddling the line between inclusion and resistance, particularly given the rise of populist, authoritarian-leaning movements at home. In this sense, the struggle between inclusion and resistance is not just an external geopolitical dynamic—it is one that many countries, including the U.S. and Israel, are grappling with internally.

Friedman’s argument that Israel can emerge as a stabilizing force through an alliance with Saudi Arabia overlooks the core issue of Palestinian sovereignty. While Netanyahu’s government seeks to normalize relations with Arab states like Saudi Arabia, the price of such an alliance—ignoring the plight of Palestinians—will likely prove unsustainable. As Ben Hubbard and Alissa J. Rubin report, the Israeli offensive against Hamas and Hezbollah has sparked widespread condemnation across the Arab world. Social media is flooded with posts calling out the destruction and human cost in Gaza and Lebanon. Saudi Arabia and other regional players may see the long-term benefit of aligning with Israel, but public opinion in these countries cannot ignore the ongoing suffering of Palestinians.

October 18, 2022

One of the key questions raised by both Friedman and the reader comments is whether Netanyahu has a plan beyond the military victories he seeks. The answer seems to be no. As one commenter noted, Netanyahu’s far-right coalition has shown little interest in pursuing peace or reconciliation with the Palestinians. The maps Netanyahu held up during his UN speech may reflect his vision of Israel’s place in the world, but their omission of Gaza and the West Bank underscores his government’s unwillingness to confront the realities of occupation and Palestinian statehood. Without a diplomatic strategy that addresses the core grievances of Palestinians, Netanyahu’s military victories will only be pyrrhic, ensuring more instability in the long run.

Hubbard and Rubin’s reporting, along with Friedman’s broader analysis, paints a picture of a region on the brink of broader conflict. The elimination of key leadership figures in Hamas and Hezbollah may satisfy short-term military objectives, but it is unlikely to lead to a lasting peace. Iran, which backs both Hezbollah and Hamas, will not simply abandon its proxies, and its response may come in ways that Israel and its allies are unprepared for. The risks of escalation, both within the region and involving global powers like Russia and China, are very real. Moreover, the humanitarian cost of these wars—particularly in Gaza and Lebanon—will only deepen the divides between Israel and the Arab world, making the prospect of normalization with Saudi Arabia ever more complicated.

While Netanyahu’s strategy may deliver tactical victories by eliminating Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, it is a strategy that comes with severe humanitarian costs and escalates the risk of broader conflict. True peace will require more than military dominance—it will demand a commitment to diplomacy, reconciliation, and a genuine effort to address the root causes of conflict, particularly Palestinian self-determination. Until Netanyahu and his government are willing to engage in meaningful peace efforts, the region will remain locked in cycles of violence and destruction. (AI)

Thursday March 20, 2024

March 21, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 20, 2024

Canada Must Prioritize Defending Ukraine and Supporting Palestine: A Call to Action

January 31, 2024

In recent months, the world has witnessed two crises of immense proportions: the relentless assault on Ukraine by Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe facing Palestinians in Gaza. As Canada grapples with its role in addressing these urgent challenges, it is imperative that we reassess our priorities and shift resources towards resisting Putin’s aggression while offering much-needed aid and support to Palestine.

News: Trudeau government to stop sending arms to Israel once details are worked out, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly says

February 16, 2026

The decision by the Trudeau government to cease arms exports to Israel represents a step in the right direction. It acknowledges the need to reassess our relationship with countries engaged in conflicts that perpetuate human suffering. However, as we take this crucial step, we must also recognize the pressing need to confront the brutal actions of Putin’s regime in Ukraine.

The conflict in Ukraine has reached a critical juncture, with reports indicating that Ukrainian forces are facing catastrophic shortages of ammunition and air defences. As Putin continues his ruthless campaign to expand Russia’s borders, it is incumbent upon Canada to stand in solidarity with the Ukrainian people and provide the support they need to defend their sovereignty and territorial integrity.

News: US estimates Ukraine military shortages could grow catastrophic by late March

This support must go beyond mere words of condemnation. Canada has a moral obligation to act decisively in defence of democracy and freedom in Ukraine. This means redirecting resources previously allocated for arms sales to Israel towards bolstering Ukraine’s defence capabilities. It means providing military aid, training, and logistical support to ensure that Ukrainian forces have the tools they need to resist Putin’s aggression.

December 14, 2023

At the same time, Canada cannot turn a blind eye to the dire humanitarian situation facing Palestinians in Gaza. The recent escalation of violence has only exacerbated an already dire situation, with reports of widespread famine and suffering among the civilian population. As a nation committed to upholding human rights and dignity, Canada must step up its efforts to provide humanitarian aid and support to the people of Palestine.

This does not mean neglecting Ukraine or prioritizing one crisis over another. Rather, it requires a nuanced and balanced approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of these crises and the need for Canada to play a proactive role in addressing them both.

December 20, 2023

By shifting resources towards resisting Putin’s aggression in Ukraine while offering food, aid, and support to Palestine, Canada can demonstrate its commitment to upholding human rights, promoting peace, and confronting tyranny wherever it may arise. Now is the time for Canada to take bold and decisive action in defence of freedom and justice around the world. The Ukrainian people and the Palestinians are counting on us.

The Vital Role of Satire in Upholding Democratic Values

In response to the recent demand for an apology by HonestReporting Canada regarding the above editorial cartoon published by The Hamilton Spectator and The Waterloo Record, it is crucial to address the misconceptions and unfounded accusations put forth by the complainant.

The letters to the editor published in The Hamilton Spectator were inspired by a very active lobby group that advocates on behalf of Israel’s government. It’s evident from the letter writers’ addresses, Scarborough, Montreal, and Toronto that these are not usual readers of this newspaper. Instead of working to point out true acts of intolerance, orchestrated pile ons such as these are aimed to gaslight editorial cartoonists and columnists into submission, to self-censor, and to stifle opinion.

Firstly, the demand for an apology stems from a gross misinterpretation of the purpose and nature of editorial cartoons. These cartoons serve as a form of satire, a fundamental aspect of free expression in democratic societies. Satire often employs exaggeration and caricature to highlight social and political issues, including the actions of political leaders and governments. It is not meant to be taken literally, but rather as a means of commentary and critique.

My editorial cartoon in question, depicts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in military actions, juxtaposed with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s announcement that Canada was halting arms sales to Israel. My mission as an editorial cartoonist includes observing Canada’s place in global affairs, and last week’s vote by Parliament to suspend arms shipments to the Netanyahu government was significant and warranted reaction. While the cartoon may appear provocative to some, its intention is clear: to comment on current events and political decisions in a satirical manner.

By Serge Chapleau. The true outrage is how veteran cartoonists get away with appropriating photographs in editorial cartoons. That needs to stop! Scroll down more about this cartoon below.

Furthermore, it is essential to recognize the pattern of silencing criticism of Netanyahu and the Israeli government by groups like HonestReporting Canada. Any form of dissent or critique is often met with accusations of antisemitism or defamation, effectively stifling open dialogue and debate. It is not the first time my cartoons have been baselessly targeted for being anti-Israel, or antisemitic. This tactic not only undermines the principles of free speech but also shields those in power from accountability and scrutiny.

The assertion that the cartoon constitutes antisemitism or promotes falsehoods about Israel’s actions is unsubstantiated and misleading. Criticizing the policies of a government, including Israel’s, does not equate to antisemitism. It is essential to differentiate between legitimate criticism of government actions and bigotry towards a particular group of people. One can can stand on humanitarian grounds demanding Hamas release the Israeli hostages, while at the same time demand the end of senseless killing of innocent Palestinian lives.

The complaint article also attempts to downplay the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the disproportionate impact of the conflict on Palestinian civilians. It is crucial to acknowledge the complexities of the situation, including the role of Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, in perpetuating violence and exploiting the suffering of civilians for political gain. Ignoring these realities only serves to undermine efforts towards a peaceful resolution and perpetuates misinformation.

Finally, satirical portrayals of Justin Trudeau or Pierre Poilievre are not anti-Canada, nor is a lampoon of Joe Biden or Donald Trump, anti-American. An editorial cartoon that ridicules a leader of Israel is not anti-Israel commentary.

January 27, 2024 – Spiked due to self censorship

The demand for an apology from The Hamilton Spectator and The Waterloo Record is baseless and undermines the principles of free expression and critical discourse essential to a democratic society. Editorial cartoons play a vital role in fostering public debate and holding power to account, and attempts to censor or silence them must be vehemently opposed.

HonestReporting Canada should redirect its efforts towards more constructive dialogue by effectively addressing instances of antisemitism where they genuinely exist, rather than attempting to silence editorial cartoonists where no antisemitism is present. By promoting understanding and tolerance rather than resorting to censorship and division, HonestReporting Canada can play a more meaningful role in fostering productive discourse and advancing genuine efforts towards peace and mutual respect. – Graeme MacKay

Letter to the Editor, The Waterloo Record, Saturday March 23, 2024

Cartoon missed the mark

I must protest the horrible cartoon you published on Thursday’s Opinion page, which totally misrepresents the truth in Gaza and Israel.

War is always ugly and terrible, but let’s get the facts straight! And stop these malignant caricatures!

I hope I will see an apology very soon.

Yosef Abramczyk, Montreal

Promote messages of tolerance – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

For our community, the recent cancellation of the Hamilton Jewish Film Festival at the Playhouse Cinema echoed a distressing past reminiscent of Kristallnacht, which marked the start of widespread boycotts against Jews. Within this environment, I was filled with despair by the recent anti-Israel political cartoon of Graeme MacKay, published in The Hamilton Spectator. The abhorrent image stirred the memories of blood libels and was reminiscent of the antisemitic propaganda of Der Stürmer.

During these difficult times, when antisemitism is rearing its ugly and pernicious head, our community is in dire need of responsible leadership and a media presence that does not perpetuate antisemitic tropes. Our local media has a responsibility to foster coexistence rather than echoing the darkest chapters of history.

The Hamilton Spectator must take a stand against such narratives and promote a message of tolerance and inclusivity. It is crucial, now more than ever, that we learn from the past and commit to a future where all members of our community feel safe, respected and valued.

Daniel Green, rabbi of Adas Israel Congregation

Appalled and dismayed– Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

I am appalled and dismayed at your having decided to include in your March 21 publication the disgusting and misinformed cartoon produced by Graeme MacKay which equates the wars in Gaza and Ukraine and which depicts Israel as deliberately targeting innocent civilians and as being the main cause of Palestinian hunger and suffering.

Jeffrey Sugar, Scarborough

Shocked to see cartoon – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

We are shocked that you would allow such an antisemitic cartoon in our paper in our city that has a large Jewish population. We trust you will apologize and not be so one-sided and research the truth of the conflict.

Bill and Judi Moffat, Burlington

Cartoon was shameful – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

I must protest the cartoon you published, which totally misrepresents the truth in Gaza and Israel in a horrible, horrible way. Shame on you! Shame on the cartoonist! It’s not for me to demand any apology, but if you have any decency, I hope you will apologize.

Yosef Abramczyk, Montreal

Cartoon was offensive – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

How could you publish an editorial cartoon depicting Israel as committing state-sponsored terrorism against innocent Palestinian civilians? Factually wrong and offensive.

Esther M. Cantor, Toronto

Serge Chapleau’s recent cartoon depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a vampire has sparked heated controversy, with accusations of antisemitism echoing through the halls of public discourse. However, amidst the uproar, it’s crucial to recognize the vital role of political satire in challenging power structures and fostering critical dialogue.

At its core, Chapleau’s cartoon is a scathing commentary on Netanyahu’s leadership and policies, particularly in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By portraying Netanyahu as a vampire, Chapleau cleverly taps into the symbolism of vampirism, depicting a figure who metaphorically drains resources and perpetuates conflict. This metaphorical portrayal is a hallmark of political satire, aiming to provoke thought and discussion rather than perpetuate hate.

Critics argue that the vampire imagery evokes antisemitic tropes, drawing parallels to historical propaganda. However, it’s essential to distinguish between legitimate criticism of a political figure and bigotry. Chapleau’s cartoon does not target Netanyahu or Jewish people as a whole based on their ethnicity or religion. Instead, it targets Netanyahu’s actions and policies as a public figure, which are subject to scrutiny and critique like any other leader.

Furthermore, the Association of Canadian Cartoonists rightly points out that caricaturing world leaders is a common practice, and Netanyahu should not be exempt from such scrutiny. Satire serves as a check on power, holding leaders accountable for their decisions and behaviours. In this light, Chapleau’s cartoon is a bold assertion of free speech and artistic expression, essential pillars of democratic societies.

Someone who gets satire!

Moreover, the notion that Chapleau’s cartoon is inherently antisemitic ignores the nuanced context in which it was created. Chapleau himself has stated that he did not intend any antisemitic connotations with his cartoon. Instead, he aimed to use striking imagery to make a powerful statement about Netanyahu’s leadership. As such, accusations of antisemitism risk diluting the significance of genuine instances of bigotry and discrimination.

While Chapleau’s cartoon may be provocative and controversial, it serves a vital purpose in challenging authority and fostering public debate. Rather than stifling dissent, we should embrace satire as a tool for social commentary and reflection. By engaging with Chapleau’s cartoon in a thoughtful and critical manner, we can move beyond knee-jerk reactions and confront the complex issues it raises with nuance and empathy. (Graeme MacKay)

On April 6, 2024 an opinion piece by yours truly, Graeme MacKay, was printed in the Hamilton Spectator in answer to the fallout from this editorial cartoon.

Friday February 16, 2026

February 16, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday February 16, 2026

Canada’s Fading Diplomacy: A Call for Principled Leadership in the Middle East

January 11, 2024

In the ever-intertwined complexities of the Middle East, Canada’s once-prominent role as a mediator and advocate for peace seems to be fading into the shadows. Recent events surrounding the Gaza-Israel conflict highlight not only our government’s indecision but also its waning influence on the international stage. As other nations, notably the USA, UK, and the EU, engage in meaningful shuttle diplomacy to address the horrific toll on innocent lives, Canada appears to be stuck in a quagmire of symbolic gestures and theatrical statements.

The current Trudeau government’s response to the conflict, as highlighted by Robyn Urback in The Globe & Mail, reflects a pattern of indecisiveness and inconsistency. From the redundant and belated sanctions on Hamas leaders to the half-hearted support for a UN resolution lacking a call for Hamas to surrender, Canada’s actions appear more as domestic theatre than a meaningful contribution to resolving the crisis. The prime minister’s seemingly strategic yet vacillating approach raises questions about Canada’s ability to navigate the complexities of the Middle East with credibility and efficacy.

Septemebr 30, 2023

In the face of Canada’s diplomatic shortcomings, the contrasting reactions from leaders like UK Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken underscore the need for a more principled stance. Cameron’s expressed concern over the next phase of Israel’s military operation in Gaza and Blinken’s persistent efforts to broker a ceasefire highlight a commitment to addressing the immediate humanitarian crisis and working towards lasting peace. In comparison, Canada’s seemingly symbolic sanctions and equivocal statements project an image of diplomatic ambiguity.

Opinion: ‘Shrinking’ political, practical capacity stunts Canada’s engagement in the Middle East, say experts

The erosion of Canada’s influence in the Middle East is a far cry from the days of Lester Pearson and the pivotal role played during the 1957 Suez Crisis. Today, as the Gaza-Israel conflict unfolds, we find ourselves relegated to the sidelines, with limited sway over the course of events. The lack of a clear and assertive stance diminishes our capacity to contribute meaningfully to diplomatic efforts aimed at preventing further bloodshed and fostering a sustainable resolution.

February 17, 2023

It is time for Canada to reassess its role in the Middle East and revive the spirit of principled leadership that once defined our diplomatic endeavours. Our government must move beyond symbolic gestures and engage in substantive diplomacy that addresses the root causes of the conflict. This requires a commitment to both immediate humanitarian relief and a steadfast pursuit of long-term peace, even if it means taking a principled position that might face domestic opposition.

Canada’s historical commitment to a two-state solution should not be relegated to mere rhetoric. We must actively work towards this goal and leverage our diplomatic relationships to play a constructive role in the region. It is essential to rebuild our credibility as a serious player on the international stage by engaging with all relevant parties, including those with whom we may disagree.

April 11, 2002

As the Middle East stands on the precipice of a humanitarian catastrophe, Canada must rise above the limitations of past indecision. The time is now for principled leadership and a renewed commitment to our historical legacy of fostering peace and stability in the face of adversity. (AI)