maps – mackaycartoons

Wednesday January 22, 2025

January 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday January 22, 2025

United States of Trump Renames

States	States	States	States
Alabaron	Arkangaetz	Connectivankacut	Delaputinware
AlasKushner	Califomaga	Floridesanctimonius	Georgesantosia
Baronzona	Trumporado	Hawaguilianii	Idadonjuniorho
Illdonjuniorois	Putindiana	Eloniowa	IllinoJFKjr
Kimjonguncky	louistrumpia	Melaniaine	Magaland
Magachusetts	Magagan	Hesgethsota	Mississtiffany
Misseric	Montrumpa	Magaska	Nevladia
New HampRamaswamyshire	New Trumpsey	New Trumpico	Kushneryork
North Magalina	North Damaga	Ohirubio	Trumplahoma
OreQUanon	Elonsylvania	Rhode Elonsland	South Kashpatelina
South Damaga	Trumpessee	Texmagas	Trumpah
Vermaga	Melaniaia	Washingtrump	Trumpington D.C.
West Virginiorban	Wistrumpskin	Wyomagaing

Symbolic Theatre in a World of Urgent Realities

January 11, 2025

In a world grappling with profound challenges, from economic crises to geopolitical tensions, President Donald Trump’s proposal to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America” stands out as an emblematic gesture of political theatre. This proposal, highlighted in his inaugural address, has sparked debate and laughter, illustrating the peculiar priorities that have become synonymous with Trump’s political style.

The proposal to rename the Gulf of Mexico, a body of water with a deep-rooted historical identity, is seen by many as trivial and unilateral. The name “Gulf of Mexico” has been entrenched in international law and history since the 17th century. Changing it would involve not just domestic procedures but complex international negotiations, particularly with Mexico and Cuba, who share the Gulf’s waters.

Marvelous Maps

News: Can Trump change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to ‘Gulf of America’?

September 15, 2020

Governor Ron DeSantis’s swift adoption of the term “Gulf of America” in a Florida state weather advisory reflects the political alignment with Trump’s agenda. However, this action underscores the symbolic nature of the proposal. While the U.S. could update federal documents to reflect the new name, the change would not be recognized internationally without consensus from other nations and organizations like the International Hydrographic Organization.

Recalling Trump’s bellicose gestures, such as his declaration that “all hell would break loose” if hostages held by Hamas weren’t released on his first day in office, rings hollow. These statements serve as a foretelling of how serious people should trust his other slogans and pledges that sound great but often fall flat. Despite his rhetoric, hell has not broken out, and his tone has shifted to a more aloof stance, expressing doubt about the ceasefire’s durability and distancing himself by stating, “it’s not our war, it’s their war.”

News: Florida is first to use ‘Gulf of America’ in official weather advisory

May 11, 2019

The renaming proposal serves as a reminder of Trump’s penchant for bold gestures that capture public attention but often lack substantive impact. It diverts focus from pressing issues such as the cost of living crisis, global security threats, and ongoing conflicts like the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the turmoil in the Middle East. These are the challenges that demand coordinated international efforts and thoughtful policy solutions, yet they received scant attention in Trump’s inaugural address.

In stark contrast to the serious and complex nature of these global issues, the renaming proposal is perceived by many as a return to the strange priorities of Trump’s previous administration. It highlights a preference for symbolic actions that resonate with a certain segment of the political base but do little to address the root causes of the world’s most pressing problems.

Video: Hillary Clinton laughs as Donald Trump says he’ll rename Gulf of Mexico

September 13, 2001

Ultimately, the debate over renaming the Gulf of Mexico serves as a microcosm of larger political dynamics. It illustrates how symbolic gestures can generate significant media coverage and public debate, yet fall short of meaningful change. As the world faces an array of urgent challenges, the focus must shift from political theatre to substantive solutions that can make a real difference in people’s lives.

This Map Editorial cartoon was featured in Politico’s Cartoon Carousel. Also, The Duluth News Tribune. Also, The Las Vegas Review-Journal.

Available for purchase on a wide range of merchandise through Redbubble and TeePublic.

Artistry lies not just in the lines an editorial cartoonist draws but also in the thoughts and challenges that shape each piece. One such challenge presented itself with Donald Trump’s peculiar promise to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.” While this idea is steeped in political theatre, it offered a fertile ground for satire and creative expression.

When Trump made this proposal during his Inaugural address, it was hard not to notice the laughter from Hillary Clinton and the eye rolls from many in the audience. The absurdity of the idea served as a reminder of how symbolic gestures can often overshadow substantial political action. This became the starting point for my latest cartoon, where I envisioned an elaborate map of the USA, peppered with similarly outlandish renamings that evoke the Trump era.

Creating this piece was no small feat. As if I’m the only one who drew this gag – I didn’t go look, because frankly, I was too busy piecing this together. The pressure of a looming deadline, the task of weaving in as many satirical elements as possible, and the drive to offer a fresh perspective all added layers to the process. It’s always a race against time, submitting to editors half an hour later past my usual 5 p.m. deadline, only to revisit the drawing with more details after dinner. The goal is to ensure that even if others have tackled the same theme, my work stands out by squeezing as much meaning and creativity into the space as possible.

In the midst of global challenges like economic instability and geopolitical tensions, Trump’s proposal seemed trivial and out of touch. Yet, it provided a satirical lens through which to view his presidency’s priorities. The exercise was not without its frustrations, especially when similar gags surface on platforms like Jimmy Fallon’s show. This is why I often incorporate Canadian contexts into my work—there’s a unique angle in the familiar, less likely to be duplicated south of the border.

Reflecting on Trump’s rhetoric, from his unfulfilled promises of resolving wars to his recent comments on the hostage situation with Hamas, there’s a recurring theme of grand gestures lacking depth. However, as a cartoonist, these very gestures offer a canvas to critique, laugh, and provoke thought. — A long four years to come.

Please enjoy the making-of my January 22 2025 editorial cartoon.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Saturday January 11, 2025

January 11, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday January 11, 2025, and The Toronto Star

Unity in the Face of Chaos

Marvelous Maps

This past week in Canada has been nothing short of surreal. With the resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the nation finds itself at a political crossroads, grappling with the implications of a leadership void. Yet, remarkably, it’s not the internal political machinations that have captured the nation’s attention. Instead, it’s the unexpected and audacious interference from south of the border, courtesy of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, that has united Canadians in a way few could have anticipated.

January 9, 2025

In a series of provocative statements, Trump has suggested that Canada could become the 51st state of the United States through “economic force.” This rhetoric, while seemingly far-fetched, has had a curious effect on a nation that has, in recent years, struggled with its sense of national identity and pride. It’s as though Trump’s ambition to “Make America Great Again” is being pursued by making life as unpleasant as possible for America’s neighbours, casting a shadow over the Canadian political landscape and, ironically, prompting a resurgence of Canadian unity and patriotism.

Opinion: Trump’s threats of using ‘economic force’ to annex Canada are far more important than who will replace Trudeau

Trump’s threats of using ‘economic force’ to annex Canada are far more important than who will replace Trudeau

November 18, 2024

As Andrew Phillips noted in The Toronto Star, the leadership race to replace Trudeau might seem significant, but it pales in comparison to the implications of Trump’s threats. The real story is how these threats have overshadowed internal divisions and prompted Canadians to rally together in defence of their sovereignty. Trump’s rhetoric has, in a way, reminded Canadians of their shared values and identity, rekindling a sense of national pride that had been waning.

Murray Mandryk’s piece in the Regina Leader Post captures this unexpected unity beautifully. Despite being one of the most divisive figures globally, Trump’s threats have brought Canadians together, transcending political and regional differences. Leaders from across the political spectrum, from Trudeau to Pierre Poilievre and even Maxime Bernier, have denounced the idea of Canada becoming the 51st state, reflecting a shared commitment to protecting Canada’s sovereignty.

Opinion: Trump doing remarkable things to unite a badly divided Canada

November 8, 2024

This unity is reminiscent of the national pride displayed during Olympic hockey events, where Canadians set aside their differences to cheer for a common cause. It’s a reminder of what it means to be Canadian, beyond simply “not being American.” As Mandryk aptly points out, Trump’s ill-defined threats have unified Canadians of all political stripes, reawakening a sense of patriotism and solidarity.

In the comments section of Lawrence Martin’s article in The Globe and Mail, readers express scepticism about the influence of public figures like Wayne Gretzky and Bobby Orr. Yet, it’s clear that the broader effect of Trump’s rhetoric has been to unite Canadians at a grassroots level. This is a testament to the resilience of the Canadian spirit, which thrives on civility and respect for democratic values.

Opinion: Gretzky and Orr need to have a real faceoff with their man, Donald Trump

October 2, 2020

Adding to this surreal week is the cooperative spirit between Canada and the U.S. in responding to the devastating wildfires in Southern California. Canada’s emergency preparedness minister, Harjit Sajjan, announced that Canadian military personnel, equipment, and several hundred firefighters stand ready to support American efforts. Provinces like Ontario, Quebec, and Alberta have pledged resources, including firefighters and aircraft, to assist in battling the blazes.

This willingness to assist our American neighbours in their time of need underscores the deep-rooted cooperation and goodwill that exists between our nations, despite political tensions. It highlights Canada’s commitment to being a good neighbour and partner, reinforcing the idea that unity and cooperation are core to our national identity.

In the midst of political chaos and division, Trump’s attempt to sow discord may have inadvertently achieved the opposite effect. Canadians are rallying together, reaffirming their commitment to an independent and strong nation. This week, we have been reminded of the strength that comes from unity and the enduring pride that defines us as Canadians. It is, perhaps, a silver lining in an otherwise tumultuous time, and for that, we might, ironically, thank Donald Trump.

I wanted to take a moment to share some thoughts that have been swirling in my mind after what has been a truly monumental week. As many of you know, I’ve always had a love for maps. Ever since I was a kid, I dreamed of being a “mapmaker” – little did I know, that fancy title is actually called cartography, and it comes with a side of math that I’ve never quite mastered!

While my dreams of drawing maps for a living didn’t quite pan out, I’ve found a way to channel that passion into my work as an editorial cartoonist. This week, inspired by the theory of continental drift, I created a cartoon that depicts the continental USA drifting away from Canada, Mexico, and the rest of the world to become an isolated island in the Pacific Ocean. I can’t help but think Donald Trump would be quite pleased with that scenario!

This week has been a rollercoaster for us Canadians. With Prime Minister Trudeau’s resignation and Trump’s audacious comments about annexing Canada, we’ve seen a surprising surge in national unity. It’s fascinating how external threats can overshadow our political divisions and rally us together in defence of our sovereignty.

In the face of these challenges, Canadians from all walks of life have come together. Our cooperative efforts to tackle the wildfires in Southern California further highlight our commitment to neighborly support. It’s a reminder of the core values of unity and cooperation that truly define what it means to be Canadian.

So here’s to maps, to unity, and to finding humour in the chaos!

Enjoy the January 11, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday or Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday August 28, 2024

August 28, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator and The Toronto Star, Wednesday August 28, 2024

An animated version of this editorial cartoon has been posted to Pinterest.

The EV Trade War: Resisting China’s Economic and Geopolitical Expansion

Marvelous Maps

China’s aggressive expansion into the electric vehicle (EV) market highlights the complex intersection between economic competition and broader geopolitical concerns. While China’s affordable EVs offer a potential solution to global carbon emissions, this comes with significant trade-offs. Western nations have already ceded much of their manufacturing power to China, resulting in a dependency that now extends to the EV industry. However, China’s disregard for Western labour, safety, and environmental standards, combined with its authoritarian ambitions and environmental contradictions, such as expanding coal-fired plants, raises significant alarms.

News: Trudeau says Canada will slap big tariffs on Chinese-made EVs

November 16, 2022

Canada’s decision to impose a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs, effective October 2024, mirrors similar actions by the United States and reflects a growing resistance to China’s influence. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau emphasized that this move is necessary to protect Canadian industries from unfair competition driven by Chinese state subsidies. While these tariffs are aimed at levelling the playing field, they also spark concerns about affordability and the pace of EV adoption, crucial for addressing climate change.

Critics argue that while Chinese EVs are more accessible due to subsidies, relying on them undermines efforts to maintain labor and environmental standards. Moreover, China’s environmental contradictions, such as the simultaneous expansion of coal-fired plants to support EV manufacturing, complicate the narrative of their green agenda. The irony of promoting EVs while increasing coal use further exposes the ethical inconsistencies in China’s policies.

Opinion: Here’s how Canada can square tariffs on Chinese EVs with the WTO

December 12, 2019

However, the implications of China’s actions extend far beyond the economic sphere. China’s efforts to exert influence in Western democracies, including allegations of interference in Canada’s 2019 and 2021 federal elections, highlight the broader geopolitical stakes. These actions have raised concerns about China’s ambitions to undermine democratic institutions while expanding its economic reach. Canada’s tariffs on Chinese EVs are thus part of a broader strategy to resist China’s growing influence.

The New York Times: Canada Will Impose 100% Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicles

Animated!

The West’s response to China’s might in the EV sector should focus on reinvigorating its own innovation and manufacturing capabilities. To preserve the principles of a free and democratic society, the West must rise to meet the challenge posed by China’s dominance. This means investing in domestic industries, enforcing trade policies that demand respect for environmental and labor standards, and fostering innovation that ensures the West can compete in the global EV market without compromising its values.

While resisting China’s influence might seem like a losing battle in the long run, it is crucial for the preservation of democratic principles and the promotion of a fair, competitive global market. If humanity is to delay the spread of authoritarianism, the West must assert its strength, innovate aggressively, and ensure that the transition to a greener future does not come at the cost of the freedoms and standards that define its societies. The imposition of tariffs on Chinese EVs is not just about economics; it’s a stand against a broader geopolitical challenge that the West cannot afford to ignore. (AI)

Tuesday May 3, 2022

May 3, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday May 3, 2022

Pulling back from wider war in Europe

August 15, 2008

As bad as the war in Ukraine has already been, it may soon get a lot worse.

So far, the death and destruction has been confined to Ukraine itself. It’s a tragedy for the Ukrainian people, but the conflict has at least been contained.

But what if it spills over into other parts of Europe, or turns into a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia? Or more directly, between the United States and Russia? That would be far more dangerous.

This is not idle speculation.

As Ukrainians put up fierce resistance to the invaders, bolstered by political support and a flood of weaponry from the West, it looks like the war will drag on. The possibility of a deal to end the fighting, a lively possibility a few weeks ago, has faded.

April 28, 2022

And the longer the conflict lasts, the greater is the risk it will spread. Not necessarily because either side has a grand design for major conflict, but by a series of escalations and miscalculations. We know from Europe’s bloody history that this is how small wars become big ones.

Once again, the danger of escalation is coming mostly from Russia. This past week, it cut off shipments of natural gas to Poland and Bulgaria and ramped up warnings about its nuclear capability.

It also looks like Moscow may be eyeing the tiny former Soviet republic of Moldova, squeezed between Ukraine and Romania, as its next target. Russia already has troops there, and a Russian general has publicly said his country intends to take over all of southern Ukraine and then link up with Moldova, the justification being to end “oppression of the Russian-speaking population.”

Behind all that, it seems, is deep frustration within the Russian military over its setbacks against Ukrainian forces and Russian President Vladimir Putin’s strategy of abandoning the goal of controlling the entire country in favour of a more limited campaign to dominate the east and south.

February 23, 2022

“Russia’s military believes that limiting the war’s initial goals is a serious error,” Russian journalists Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan write for the Center for European Policy Analysis in Washington, D.C. “They now argue that Russia is not fighting Ukraine, but NATO.”

All of which suggests that behind the facade of unity behind Putin, Russia’s military and security apparatus is seriously divided, with a powerful faction arguing in favour of expanding the war, not ending it. They’re pushing for even more aggressive action in Ukraine itself, as well as a push beyond its borders.

On the other side, western allies are escalating their support for Ukraine. More sanctions, more troops in the region (Britain announced 8,000 more last week), and more heavy weaponry.

Some have read much into the statement by U.S. Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin that Washington wants “to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine.”

Marvellous Maps

For them, that reveals a hidden “real reason” why the U.S. (and presumably Canada, France, Germany et al) are backing Ukraine. This, however, ignores the fact that Russia brought the alliance against it entirely on itself with its unprovoked aggression. And what decent person, in the end, doesn’t want to see Putin rendered incapable of inflicting similar violence on others?

Regardless of the rights and wrongs, the prospect of a wider war is horrifying. Right now there’s a consensus in the West around supporting Ukraine. But there’s no consensus around pursuing a broader campaign against Russia as such.

The danger, however, is that we may find ourselves on that road without quite realizing it.

While there’s still time, the world needs to find a way to back away from the brink. (Hamilton Spectator Editorial)

Saturday March 12, 2022

March 12, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday March 12, 2022

Bye-bye to the Big Mac: Russia’s war heralds a dark, isolated economic era

August 10, 2007

The big western brands showed Vladimir Putin how to do it. While the Kremlin’s army was getting bogged down in Ukraine, Coca-Cola and Starbucks lost no time in closing their doors to Russian customers.

But the most emblematic move of all came from McDonald’s, which has shut all 850 of its outlets in Russia. The availability of Big Macs in the Soviet Union was seen in 1990 as evidence that the west’s old cold war foe was turning its back on communism, but the past fortnight has rekindled memories of the bad old days. There were queues outside McDonald’s when it first opened in Moscow. Last week, Russians queued for one last burger before the pull-out began.

One of Putin’s predecessors in the Kremlin – Lenin – once said there were decades when nothing happens and weeks when decades happen, and that’s true of the period since Russian troops moved across the border into Ukraine on 24 February.