Ontario – Page 2 – mackaycartoons

Thursday May 29 2025

May 29, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 29 2025

Published also in The Toronto Star, and on Reddit.

Ford’s Fast Track: Mining Progress or Consultation Overlook?

October 22, 2022

Back in 2019, Premier Doug Ford’s government tried to push through Bill 66, which threatened the Greenbelt and ignored environmental protections. Public outrage forced them to backtrack. Fast forward to 2025, and it seems the government hasn’t learned its lesson with Bill 5.

Bill 5 aims to speed up mining in the Ring of Fire region by creating “special economic zones.” This move is supposed to boost the economy, but it has angered Indigenous leaders and the public. Critics argue it’s like a repeat of Bill 66, ignoring the need for proper consultation with those affected.

News: Doug Ford government amends controversial mining bill to allay First Nation concerns

January 24, 2025

To Ford’s credit, he has skillfully tackled the challenges posed by the Trump administration’s trade actions, which threatens Ontario’s manufacturing base. By focusing on developing the mining of critical minerals, he has aligned with voter support for economic resilience and growth. However, what’s lost in this expectation granted by citizens is the crucial need for proper consultation with Indigenous communities.

Despite offering amendments to allow Indigenous-led economic zones, the government’s promise to consult with First Nations after the fact seems insincere. Indigenous communities should be involved from the start, not as an afterthought.

News: Doug Ford offers amendment to First Nations on mining bill but vows to speed development through ‘economic zones’

December 11, 2018

Reader comments highlight the need for genuine engagement and respect for Indigenous rights. The government’s approach of rushing development without proper input feels like a misstep, echoing past mistakes.

Consultation isn’t just a formality; it’s essential for fair and democratic decision-making. By not learning from the past, the Ford government risks repeating history with Bill 5. It’s time for a more inclusive approach that values the input of all Ontarians and respects the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Only then can we ensure a future that’s fair and sustainable for everyone.

A Test for Doug – Editorial Cartoon for Thursday May 29, 2025

Posted to Substack

After all these years since Canada kicked off its reconciliation efforts with Indigenous Peoples, you’d think we’d have the basics down by now. One of the most fundamental practices is meaningful consultation, especially when it comes to economic development that impacts our environment—whether it’s the sea, air, or land. And when it comes to something like mining, this should be a no-brainer.

December 11, 2018 – Environmentalists and critics accused Premier Doug Ford of breaking his promise to protect the Greenbelt, claiming that the changes introduced in Bill 66 undermined environmental protections and opened the area to development.

Yet, here comes Doug Ford, ready to defy common sense and try to limit consultation once again. This isn’t the first time he’s taken this approach, and it seems like another case of lessons not learned. It’s as if he’s trying to sneak this by, testing the waters to see how far he can push things.

Considering that less than half of Ontario’s voters bothered to cast a ballot, it might seem like Ford reads the 55% who didn’t vote as a kind of silent approval. But relying on voter apathy or disengagement is risky business. Silence doesn’t equal consent, especially when it comes to respecting the rights and voices of Indigenous communities.

Tuesday November 28, 2023 – The Ontario Liberal Party is set to announce its new leader, facing the challenge of overcoming voter apathy and past election setbacks to compete against Doug Ford in future elections.

In today’s animated editorial cartoon, which Substack subscribers get to preview before it hits the Hamilton Spectator, I’m being upfront about a new technique I’ve started using: AI for adding voice to the characters.

According to YouTube’s policy, it’s essential to disclose when content is altered or synthetic, especially if it seems real. This includes realistic sounds or visuals created with AI. With today’s technology, the line between real and fake is increasingly blurred, and AI-generated voices are impressively accurate.

One of my critiques of animated satire has always been the voiceovers for political figures. While some might be as skilled as David Levine at caricaturing, they often fall short of Rich Little when it comes to voice impressions. Now, with AI, replicating political voices is not only easy but also a bit unsettling.

In the animated clip below, I’ve used software to mimic the voice of Doug Ford. I believe it’s clear that it’s not really him, but for those who might be too convinced, there’s a disclaimer in place.

This is uncharted territory, and I’d love to hear your thoughts. If you have any feedback or want to start a conversation, now’s your chance.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. Please Enjoy the animated making of my May 29, 2025 editorial cartoon below and thank you for your continued support!

Friday May 23 2025

May 23, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday May 23 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s Journey from Hamilton to NBA Stardom

June 19, 2019

In the heart of Hamilton, Ontario, where the steel mills meet a burgeoning cultural scene, a young basketball prodigy named Shai Gilgeous-Alexander took his first steps onto the hardwood.

Today, he stands as one of the NBA’s most celebrated players, having recently clinched the league’s coveted MVP award. This achievement not only marks a personal milestone for Gilgeous-Alexander but also resonates deeply with his hometown and beyond.

News: Hamilton’s Shai Gilgeous-Alexander wins NBA MVP award over Nikola Jokic

Shai’s journey began at St. Thomas More Catholic Secondary School in Hamilton, where he honed his skills and nurtured his passion for basketball. Hamilton has always been a city that champions its own, and Shai’s rise to prominence is a testament to that spirit. From local courts to the global stage, his journey reflects the determination and resilience that define this community. As the second Canadian ever to win the NBA MVP, he follows in the footsteps of Steve Nash, proving that Canadian talent can thrive in the upper echelons of a sport long dominated by American stars—a sport, ironically, invented by Canadian James Naismith.

Shai’s path was not without its challenges. Drafted 11th overall and initially overlooked by many, he quickly proved his worth, becoming the cornerstone of the Oklahoma City Thunder. His style of play—characterized by his ability to drive to the basket, draw fouls, and consistently score—has become the stuff of legend. Yet, it’s his humility and team-first mentality that endear him to fans and teammates alike.

Opinion: MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander should be the new face of the NBA

“You Might be from Hamilton if…”

In winning the MVP, Gilgeous-Alexander has not only brought pride to Hamilton but has also set a new benchmark for Canadian athletes. His success underscores the potential of Canadian basketball, hinting at a future where our nation could become an athletic superpower, challenging traditional perceptions and rewriting the narrative.

His story is a reminder that greatness can emerge from anywhere—even from the streets of Hamilton and the halls of St. Thomas More. As he continues to lead the Thunder and represent Canada on the international stage, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s legacy is one that inspires and unites, reminding us all of the power of perseverance, community, and the pursuit of excellence.

Wednesday May 21 2025

May 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 21 2025

Ford and Trump: Economic Growth at Environment’s Cost

November 16, 2024

In a striking political maneuver, Doug Ford secured a third term as Ontario’s Premier by channeling public outrage against Donald Trump and his tariff policies. This strategy, while effective at the polls, has obscured a more profound and troubling similarity between Ford and Trump: a shared devotion to economic development that disregards environmental sustainability and, arguably, the very reality of climate change.

NYT Opinion: The U.S. Under Trump: Alone in Its Climate Denial

October 31, 2023

Ford’s recent legislative actions and budgetary decisions echo the deregulatory zeal that characterized Trump’s presidency. Both leaders have prioritized immediate economic growth, often through support for traditional energy sectors and infrastructure projects, over long-term environmental stewardship.

Bill 5, a legislative proposal under Ford’s government, seeks to create “special economic zones” that bypass established environmental regulations and Indigenous consultation processes. This move mirrors Trump’s efforts to roll back federal environmental protections in favour of accelerating industrial projects. Critics argue that such policies represent a short-sighted approach, undermining ecological safeguards and social equity in pursuit of rapid economic gains.

July 11, 2018

Environmentalists and Indigenous leaders have voiced strong opposition, warning that Bill 5 could lead to the destruction of habitats and erosion of constitutionally protected rights. The Toronto Star’s coverage highlights the potential for this legislation to concentrate power within the provincial cabinet, enabling decisions that may favour private interests over public good—a hallmark of the Trump administration’s approach to governance.

The Narwhal’s analysis of Ontario’s budget reveals further parallels. Despite recent extreme weather events, Ford’s government has opted to cut funding for emergency preparedness and forest firefighting. Instead, the focus remains on building highways and expanding mining in the Ring of Fire, areas rich in critical minerals but fraught with ecological and social concerns.

The Narwal: Ontario budget weighs tariff threats, ignores climate threat

December 1, 2018

This emphasis on infrastructure expansion at the expense of environmental considerations is reminiscent of Trump’s prioritization of fossil fuel projects and infrastructure over climate action. Both leaders seem to view environmental regulations as obstacles to economic progress rather than essential safeguards for future generations.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent dismissal of climate change as a pressing issue. Ford’s policies, much like Trump’s, lack a comprehensive strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or address the root causes of climate change. The reliance on fossil fuels has increased under both administrations, reversing progress made in previous years and contributing to higher emissions.

Ford’s budget cuts to environmental programs and resistance to sustainable transport solutions, such as bike lanes and public transit expansion, further underscore a disconnect between economic policies and environmental realities. This approach risks leaving Ontario—and indeed the world—ill-prepared for the escalating impacts of climate change.

The Toronto Star: Ford government denies bill to speed up development will override environmental and Indigenous concerns

November 12, 2024

The Greenbelt controversy, which plagued Ford’s government, serves as a glaring example of the administration’s failure to learn from its mistakes. Despite public outcry and legal challenges over attempts to develop protected lands, the government continues to pursue similar policies that prioritize development over conservation. This pattern of behavior suggests a persistent disregard for environmental sustainability and public trust.

While Ford’s political strategy of leveraging external threats like Trump’s tariffs may win elections, it cannot mask the fundamental need for a balanced approach to development. Economic prosperity and environmental sustainability are not mutually exclusive; they must be pursued in tandem to ensure a viable future.

Substack: Donald Trump: Dirtiest U.S. President Ever

June 2, 2017

Both Ford and Trump have demonstrated a penchant for policies that prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term ecological health. As voters and citizens, it is crucial to demand leadership that recognizes and addresses the intertwined challenges of economic development and environmental stewardship. Only then can we hope to achieve a sustainable and equitable future for all.

Denial’s Golden Voyage: Sailing Past Reality in 2025 by The Graeme Gallery

Wednesday May 21, 2025

Read on Substack

Friday May 16 2025

May 16, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday May 16 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star. Also on Reddit.

Ontario’s Budget Crossroads: Investing in Uncertain Times

April 16, 2025

As Ontario gets ready to roll out its provincial budget, it’s clear that we’re dealing with some serious challenges. The Trump tariffs have hit our manufacturing and auto parts sectors hard, creating uncertainty not just here, but worldwide. In these times, it’s crucial to focus on smart investments rather than cutbacks to keep our economy stable and growing.

The tariffs are a major blow to Ontario’s economy, affecting key industries that drive our prosperity. This budget needs to show a commitment to helping these sectors through targeted investments that can make a real difference.

News: Ford pledges Ontario budget with infrastructure spending, not cuts, to battle U.S. tariffs

One area that stands out is infrastructure. Investing in things like better transportation, modern public facilities, and clean energy projects can create jobs now and set us up for success down the road. These projects boost productivity and competitiveness, and they can spark broader economic growth.

January 29, 2025

However, we’ve seen mistakes in the past with spending, like the expensive cancellations of renewable energy projects, the dubious Highway 401 tunnel idea, and the controversial decision to open up parts of the Greenbelt for development. These moves have raised concerns about wasteful spending and environmental impacts. Going forward, the government needs to make sure that money is spent wisely, with clear benefits and a focus on transparency.

It’s also essential to protect services like healthcare and education from budget cuts. These are crucial for everyone’s well-being and future potential.

News: Ten things you should know about Ontario’s budget

March 27, 2024

As we look to this new budget, there’s a chance to make choices that support both fiscal responsibility and smart investment. By prioritizing infrastructure and protecting our natural spaces like the Greenbelt, Ontario can tackle the current economic challenges and build a stronger future. This approach not only addresses immediate needs but also aligns with long-term goals, ensuring stability and growth. In these uncertain times, especially with the far-reaching effects of the Trump tariffs, thoughtful investment will be key to overcoming global economic challenges and securing a sustainable path forward for Ontario.

No Substack posting today. It’s Spring and duties to mow the lawn come before substack postings. Instead, enjoying the toiling I did today on the boring subject of provincial budget time. See the static version in tomorrow’s Hamilton Spectator. Don’t forget to like, if you like what you see here, it encourages me to post.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday May 1, 2025

May 1, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 1, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

The Conservative Conundrum: Disunity and Factionalism Post-Election

April 25, 2025

The recent federal election has laid bare the deep-rooted disunity and factionalism within Canada’s Conservative Party, underscoring a schism that has evolved over decades. As Pierre Poilievre grapples with his electoral defeat and the loss of his Ottawa-area seat, the internal blame game has commenced, revealing persistent tensions within the conservative ranks.

Pierre Poilievre’s decision to remain as leader, despite losing his seat, highlights the complexities of the current situation. His leadership style, which aligns with the populist, Alberta-centred wing of conservatism, contrasts with the Progressive Conservative tradition led by figures like Doug Ford. This ideological rift, dating back to the eras of Preston Manning and Stephen Harper, continues to challenge the party’s cohesion.

News: ‘It’s an unmitigated disaster’: Conservative insiders debate Pierre Poilievre’s future as leader after election defeat

April 19, 2025

The schism within the Conservative Party has evolved through key historical milestones. During the 1990s, the Reform Party, led by Preston Manning, emphasized Western interests, fiscal conservatism, and skepticism of federal intervention. Stephen Harper later unified the Reform and Progressive Conservative factions to form the modern Conservative Party, but underlying tensions have persisted.

The party has seen recent leadership turnover reflecting these internal divisions. Andrew Scheer, who led the party in the 2019 election, was criticized for being too socially conservative and was subsequently replaced. Erin O’Toole, who moved the party towards the centre, faced rejection in the aftermath of the 2021 election, highlighting the ongoing struggle to find a leadership approach that resonates with the entire conservative base.

April 9, 2025

Poilievre represents the values of the Reform wing, focusing on conservative fiscal policies and provincial autonomy. His allies, such as Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, share these priorities. In contrast, Doug Ford embodies the centrist Progressive Conservative tradition, emphasizing pragmatic governance and coalition-building. Tim Houston of Nova Scotia aligns with this more moderate approach.

The election results have intensified internal blame and criticism. Figures like Jamil Jivani have accused Ford of undermining Poilievre’s campaign, while Ford’s public criticisms of Poilievre’s strategy reflect deeper personal and political tensions. Ford’s strategic decision to distance himself highlights his alignment with more centrist values and his potential ambitions within the broader Conservative movement.

News: MP accuses Doug Ford of ‘sabotaging’ federal election campaign by helping Liberals

March 25, 2025

The schism is further exacerbated by Poilievre’s perceived lack of outreach and collaboration with key political figures, including Ford. This strategic misstep isolated his campaign and limited its appeal beyond its populist base. The absence of a united front, especially in critical regions like Ontario, hindered the party’s electoral success.

The Conservative Party now faces a critical juncture. Addressing internal divisions and fostering unity will be essential for future success. The challenge lies in balancing the priorities of both factions and presenting a cohesive platform that resonates with a national audience.

January 15, 2025

Reconciliation efforts must focus on bridging the gap between the Reform and Progressive Conservative traditions. This involves finding common ground on key issues, fostering dialogue, and embracing a leadership approach that unites rather than divides.

As the Conservative Party stands at a crossroads, the recent election serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by disunity and factionalism. Pierre Poilievre’s leadership, now under scrutiny, embodies the complexities of balancing the party’s diverse ideological factions. His approach and ability to navigate these internal tensions will significantly influence the party’s trajectory.

Ultimately, the Conservative Party’s path forward hinges on its capacity to reconcile internal differences and adapt to the evolving political landscape. As Poilievre’s leadership is evaluated, there is a pressing need for reflection and adaptation to chart a course that ensures future success and stability. The party must seize this moment to unify and present a vision that resonates across the Canadian political spectrum.