plastics – mackaycartoons

Thursday April 25, 2024

April 25, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 25, 2024

Moving Beyond Rhetoric – Time for Real Solutions to Plastic Pollution

January 18, 2022

In the wake of recent international conferences and negotiations aimed at addressing plastic pollution, one can’t help but feel a sense of skepticism lingering in the air. The promises of global treaties and domestic initiatives to combat plastic waste often sound promising on paper, yet the reality on the ground tells a different story.

Consider the latest discussions in Ottawa, where delegates from 175 countries convened to develop a legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. Ambitious goals were set to mobilize the entire world and create a future free of plastic pollution by 2040. While these aspirations are admirable, they must be met with tangible actions and transformative strategies to truly make a difference.

Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault rightly pointed out the shortcomings of our current recycling practices, acknowledging that they simply “won’t cut it” in the fight against plastic pollution. He emphasized the need for a shift towards a circular economy, focusing on reuse rather than mere recycling. This sentiment resonates with many who have grown weary of the recycling mantra that seems to have yielded little progress over the years.

News: Poverty. Sovereignty. The war in Ukraine. As countries try to agree on fixing plastic, here’s what’s in their way

November 30, 2023

Furthermore, the allocation of funds to support Canadian businesses in developing technologies to address plastic waste is a step in the right direction. However, these investments must be part of a larger, concerted effort to revolutionize how we produce, consume, and dispose of plastics.

Dimple Roy, from the International Institute for Sustainable Development, highlighted the urgency of addressing microplastic pollution in freshwater systems. This underscores the interconnectedness of our ecosystems and the need for comprehensive solutions that encompass all aspects of the plastic lifecycle.

April 24, 2018

Yet, amidst these discussions and initiatives, the public remains skeptical. We meticulously sort our recyclables, only to discover that much of it ends up in landfills or incinerators. We witness the proliferation of biodegradable alternatives that fail to gain widespread acceptance due to their own set of environmental trade-offs.

It’s time to move beyond the rhetoric of “reduce, reuse, recycle” and embrace a paradigm shift in our approach to plastic pollution. We need bold policies that incentivize sustainable practices, innovative technologies that offer viable alternatives to plastics, and a cultural shift towards conscious consumption.

News: Ottawa looking for Canadian-made solutions for plastic pollution

March 6, 2015

Let us not be swayed by empty promises or symbolic gestures. The time for action is now. We must hold our leaders and policymakers accountable for delivering on their commitments to protect our planet from the scourge of plastic pollution.

As negotiations continue and initiatives are rolled out, let’s demand more than just words on paper. Let’s demand real, meaningful change that leaves a lasting impact on our environment and future generations.

In the battle against plastic pollution, we cannot afford to settle for anything less.

The packaging industry is worth more than a trillion dollars per year globally, and with e-commerce extending the supply chain from the extraction of raw materials to the hands of the consumer, it has never been more important to the functioning of the global economy.

But in sustainability terms, packaging is a problem. Continued: Packaging a problem, January 23, 2023

Wednesday April 22, 2020

April 29, 2020 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 22, 2020

Single-use plastic is having a resurgence during the pandemic

For those seeking silver linings in the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, the notable drop-off in air pollution has been a recurring bright spot. But while theskies might be clearing up (at least temporarily) while millions of people shelter in place, humans are poisoning the planet in other ways. Increased demand for medical supplies, households stocking up on tons of goods, and fears over COVID-19 spreading across different surfaces has single-use plastics on the rise — and as Wired reports, we’re running out of places to put it.

March 12, 2019

As more plastic waste pours in, the already overwhelmed recycling system is at risk of getting completely buried. Prior to coronavirus, many recycling companies were already struggling to deal with the more than 300 million tons of plastic discarded every year — nearly 50 percent of which is single-use. According to the Earth Institute at Columbia University, only about 10 percent of all discarded plastic products in the United States actually get recycled — a fact the plastic industry knew for years while touting recycling programs that would never be viable. Nearly 75 percent ends up in landfills, where it can sit and erode for hundreds of years, releasing carbon dioxide as it degrades and often making its way into waterways and oceans. It’s likely that as the country produces more plastic waste in this time of crisis, even more will be heading to landfills, as the already inundated recycling firms slow their operations. “Many recyclers, because of health and safety concerns, are also stopping the service,” Tom Szaky, CEO of recycling company TerraCycle, told Wired. “Recycling — that’s been in sort of a crash — is now getting even worse.”

April 24, 2018

Those slowdowns are happening in tandem with a resurgence in single-use plastics. This is happening for a number of reasons, both out of necessity and potentially unfounded fears. Plastic bags have made a comeback during thecoronavirus crisis due to concerns that reusable bags may carry the virus. A number of states and cities have reversed plastic bag bans and some have even instituted restrictions on reusable totes. While it is known that coronavirus can survive longer on certain surfaces, there doesn’t appear to be any evidence that the virus is more viable on a cloth tote than a plastic bag, particularly if the bag is washed after use — though the plastic bag is likely to be discarded after one use, limiting additional exposure. With people worried that the virus can be transmitted through a number of surfaces, the demand for packaged goods is on the rise as well. According to FoodNavigator, demand for packaged goods has skyrocketed in Europe by as much as 111 percent for some items as compared to the previous year.

There is also the fact that the price of oil has dropped dramatically, which makes producing plastic goods cheaper than usual — and they aren’t all that expensive to begin with. Plastics are made from oil, and when the price of oil drops far enough, it can result in it actually being cheaper to produce new plastic products than recycle old ones. And when the demand for recycled goods disappears, more plastic ends up in landfills, slowly eroding and polluting the planet.

Plastic waste doesn’t have the same effect as something like air pollution — we don’t immediately see the damage as it occurs. But the change in our consumption habits will be immediately felt at the landfills that are already being overrun. It will be felt by oceans that are already at risk of having more pieces of plastic than fish by 2050. Even the short burst of uptick in plastic waste could cause significant disruption to the waste and recycling ecosystems. According to Waste Dive, dozens of cities and counties across the country have suspended recycling programs entirely. Rachel Meidl, a fellow at Rice University’s Baker Institute, told Wired, “materials that would normally find its way to recyclers are being channeled to landfills and incinerators.” So before touting that “we are the virus” meme and spouting off to your friends about how the Earth is healing while we’re all trapped indoors, remember that there are a lot of ways we can hurt the planet without ever leaving our couches. (Mic)

Saturday August 3, 2019

August 13, 2019 by Graeme MacKay

August 3, 2019

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday August 3, 2019

New credit card payment rules for Quebecers take effect today

January 18, 2018

Quebec’s new rules on minimum credit card payments, which take effect Thursday, will likely be followed closely by other provinces, the head of a consumer advocacy group says.

The new rules require banks to set a minimum payment of at least two per cent of the balance owing starting Aug. 1. It will eventually rise to five per cent.

“I suspect that other provinces are looking at this carefully, looking to see the impact from this, [and if there are] any objections from the credit-granting community,” said Scott Hannah, president and CEO of the Credit Counselling Society.

“But really this just makes good fiscal sense. For those who’ve gotten themselves into debt, this will help them.”

May 13, 2010

Twenty years ago, a five per cent minimum payment was fairly standard, Tanguay said. But the minimum percentage has dropped since then.

Banks have the option of raising the minimum payment rate to five per cent right away, although Hannah doubts many institutions will do so because that change could have negative consequences for people with higher debts.

There are no federal rules about minimum payments, but there is nothing preventing other provinces from coming up with their own.

Consumer protection policies can happen at a provincial level, but Hannah said that there tends to be continuity between provinces on these kinds of rules.

“Other provinces in Canada will be looking at this carefully, and if they’re not seeing a lot of challenges or uproar from consumers or credit granters, they may elect to adopt similar legislation,” he said. (CBC)

Friday June 7, 2019

June 13, 2019 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 7, 2019

Study sheds light on human consumption of microplastics

A study from the University of Victoria has for the first time compiled research on microplastics to try to estimate just how much people are consuming.

June 1, 2019

Microplastics are pieces of plastic that are just under five millimetres in diameter — or smaller than the size of a sesame seed — that come from the degradation of larger plastic products or the shedding of particles from water bottles, plastic packaging and synthetic clothes.

Garth Covernton, a PhD candidate at University of Victoria’s department of biology, said his team looked at 26 papers assessing the amount of microplastics found in individual food items.

May 2, 2018

The study found that a person’s average microplastic consumption — based on those food items previously analyzed — would likely be somewhere between 70,000 and 121,000 particles per year. While younger girls were at the lower end of the spectrum, adult men were at the high end.

People who consume a lot of bottled water could see that number jump by up to 100,000 particles per year.

The study analyzed the amount of microplastics found in fish, shellfish, sugars, salts, alcohol, water and air, which account for 15 per cent of Americans’ caloric intake.

But the other 85 per cent of what people consume, like beef, poultry, dairy and grains, has still not been examined.

March 6, 2015

Covernton compared the study to early understandings of cigarettes and tobacco: While the numbers they came up with did seem large, they don’t yet know exactly what level of consumption is dangerous.

“We’re at the point where we know microplastics at some dose could be harmful, but we’re not at the point where we can say whether what the average person is encountering is the equivalent of one cigarette in a lifetime, or that chronic exposure, like a pack a day.”

Covernton said the findings demonstrate more work needs to be done to understand how the tiny particles might affect human health. (CBC)

Tuesday April 24, 2018

April 23, 2018 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 24, 2018

‘We need to rethink the entire plastics industry’: Why banning plastic straws isn’t enough

Britain announced this week that it plans to ban the sale of single-use plastic straws, as support for similar bans grows in Canada and around the world.

March 6, 2015

Advocates say such straw bans should help reduce plastic pollution that harms wildlife and ecosystems, but we need to monitor the effects of such policies. And they say bans may not be feasible for most of the plastics in our lives, so broader changes to the way we produce, consume and dispose of plastics are needed to make a real difference.

Jennifer Provencher, a postdoctoral researcher at Acadia University who studies the ingestion of plastic pollution by wildlife, said Britain’s ban is “an incredibly important step towards minimizing and using plastics more responsibly.”

She noted that single-use plastic items like straws and stir sticks are generally used only for a few minutes before they’re discarded, but can persist in the environment for centuries because plastics don’t typically decompose within a human lifetime.

Scientists estimate we’ve made 8.3 billion tonnes of plastic since the 1950s and 6.3 billion tonnes have already become waste.

More than 330,000 pieces of plastic and foam waste were picked off 2,800 kilometres of Canada’s shoreline by volunteers during beach cleanup events last year, including 17,654 straws — the ninth most common item found during cleanups supported by Ocean Wise and WWF-Canada. Worldwide, 409,087 straws and stirrers were picked up in beach cleanups around the world in 2017, the Ocean Conservancy reports.

Because of their small size, disposable straws are rarely recycled and often end up in the environment.

There, they can cause serious injuries to animals, as shown in a 2015 video that shows a straw being pulled out of a sea turtle’s nostril — the graphic, viral video has been viewed more than 21 million times. (Source: CBC)

A look back from February 9, 2025

Trump’s Environmental Rollback and the Plastic Straw Debate

Donald Trump is wielding a metaphorical chainsaw against critical oversight mechanisms meant to protect both citizens and the environment. His aggressive dismantling of federal agencies, mass firings within the U.S. civil service, and targeting of programs that support the world’s most vulnerable populations reveal a cavalier approach to governance. These actions not only undermine the fabric of national institutions but also jeopardize efforts to safeguard the planet for future generations.

News: Trump Vows to Keep the Government on Plastic Straws

As a prominent climate crisis denier, Trump has exhibited a blatant disregard for scientific evidence that highlights the urgent need to address our warming planet. His anti-intellectual stance, which dismisses science as fiction, has effectively stifled innovation for a greener future. By gaslighting millions into adopting his science-denying mindset, Trump has set back environmental progress in favour of short-term political gains.

His recent announcement to sign an executive order reversing the push for paper straws in exchange for old plastic ones exemplifies his regressive environmental policies. By criticizing paper straws as ineffective, Trump trivializes serious efforts to reduce single-use plastics, potentially dragging us back to an era of unchecked pollution and environmental degradation.

The broader implications of Trump’s policies are starkly highlighted in the 2018 cartoon “This is Your Life in Single Use Plastics,” which depicts plastic waste sharing stories of their long-lasting impact on the environment. This cartoon serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring legacy of plastic pollution and the importance of sustainable practices.

News: Scientists brace ‘for the worst’ as Trump purges climate mentions from websites

Trump’s decision to favour plastics over sustainable alternatives not only undermines global efforts to address plastic pollution but also aligns with the interests of the fossil fuel industry, which heavily supported his campaign. This prioritization of industry interests over environmental responsibility raises serious questions about his commitment to safeguarding the planet for future generations.

As the world grapples with the challenges of plastic waste and climate change, Trump’s environmental rollback highlights a stark choice between economic interests and ecological responsibility. By reversing key environmental policies, he risks leaving a legacy of environmental neglect and missed opportunities for meaningful change.