populism – mackaycartoons

Tuesday March 11, 2025

March 11, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator –Tuesday March 11, 2025

Carney vs. Populism: Canada’s Crucial Leadership Choice

March 7, 2025

As Canada faces a critical moment, the upcoming election is an important decision for the nation. The biggest challenge is dealing with Donald Trump’s aggressive economic policies, which aim to weaken Canada with tariffs and even suggest annexation. Canadians need to carefully consider the two leading candidates for prime minister: Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre.

Mark Carney, elected as the Liberal Party leader just yesterday, is new to politics but brings valuable economic experience. As a former head of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, Carney knows how to handle economic challenges, especially with the U.S. pushing hard. His recent speech emphasized Canada’s independence and determination to stand strong, reflecting the national desire to protect our way of life. Carney’s international experience could help Canada build stronger economic ties beyond the U.S.

News: Poilievre and Carney are poised to recreate a legendary Canadian rivalry

February 20, 2025

In contrast, Pierre Poilievre’s approach focuses on populism, using strong rhetoric to rally support. He’s good at connecting with people who feel left out, but there are doubts about his economic skills and how he plans to deal with the challenges from Trump’s administration. Poilievre’s style could energize his supporters but might also divide the country when unity is crucial.

The main challenge for Canada is figuring out how to deal with these tough economic times while keeping the country united. Carney’s approach, focusing on working together and making thoughtful decisions, seems promising. His ability to bring people together and work with others is a big plus in uncertain times.

Editorial: For Mark Carney, now comes the hard part

November 9 2024

As Canadians get ready to vote, it’s important to think beyond party lines and focus on what’s best for the country’s future. The threat from Trump’s policies is something that affects everyone, regardless of politics. In choosing between Carney and Poilievre, Canadians need to consider whether they want a leader with strong economic skills or one who relies on populist appeal.

Ultimately, Canada needs a leader who can inspire confidence, bring people together, and guide the country through these challenges with wisdom. Mark Carney, with his economic know-how and focus on collaboration, might just be the leader Canada needs to stay strong and independent.

As an editorial cartoonist, I try to separate my instincts from the real issues facing our country. Still, I believe Mark Carney is the right choice for Prime Minister. To me, Pierre Poilievre seems like a showman who appeals to a far-right audience that doesn’t reflect Canada’s social values.

Poilievre reminds me of Trump—he denies climate change, rejects working with other countries, flirts with conspiracy theories, and dislikes the media. Canadians have rejected this kind of social conservatism in past elections.

While I’m always cautious about putting too much faith in any leader, Carney’s recent strong support from delegates raises high expectations. He has an impressive background and now, as Prime Minister designate, he must represent all Canadians, not just his party. He needs to unify the nation and assure Conservative voters that he’s the right choice for moving forward.

Carney must also be different from Justin Trudeau, who was often seen as divisive, partly due to Poilievre’s constant criticism. Poilievre’s attempts to appeal to everyone may not convince Canadians he’s the leader to stand up to Trump and defend Canada. Carney, however, has the chance to be a unifying figure.

The cartoon I created reflects this political scene, with the “Captain Canada” superhero suit symbolizing leadership. It humorously highlights the need for a leader who represents the whole country.

Canada is at a crucial point, facing economic challenges and Trump’s tough trade policies. Carney’s strong economic background offers a fresh perspective to guide us toward stability. The upcoming election will show whether Canadians choose economic expertise and collaboration or populist rhetoric. A unifying leader is essential to navigate these challenging times and protect our nation.

Here’s the animated making-of clip of my March 11, 2025 editorial cartoon. I have a huge collection of these on my channel through the YouTube link below.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday January 24, 2025

January 24, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday January 24, 2025, and The Toronto Star

Doug Ford’s Call for a Mandate is a Diversion, Not a Solution

Young Doug Ford: The Series

In the wake of President-elect Donald Trump’s provocative rhetoric about using “economic force” against Canada, Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s call for a new mandate to tackle potential U.S. tariffs seems less about addressing genuine economic challenges and more about diverting attention from his government’s shortcomings.

Opinion: Doug Ford is trying to protect himself, not Ontario, with an early election call

His concept of “Fortress Am-Can” emerges as a notable, albeit gimmicky, initiative by Ontario Premier Doug Ford. This catchy moniker is intended to symbolize a robust economic alliance with the United States, aiming to fortify trade relations while addressing potential external threats. While the name conjures images of impenetrable economic strength, critics might argue that it serves more as a rhetorical flourish than a concrete policy framework, highlighting the complexities and challenges inherent in truly integrating cross-border economic strategies with domestic priorities. It’s has yet to be seen if the moniker goes anywhere.

January 17, 2025

The proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods by Trump present a significant economic threat, but framing an election as the solution is misleading. At a time when the Canadian economy needs strategic, collaborative responses, Ford’s focus on securing political capital is a distraction from more pressing and actionable solutions.

For one, Canada must urgently diversify its trading relationships. Reliance on the U.S. leaves Canada vulnerable to the whims of American policy shifts. By expanding trade ties with Europe, Asia, and other global markets, Canada can bolster its economic resilience and reduce dependency on a single partner.

Moreover, the real opportunity for economic strengthening lies within our borders. Interprovincial trade barriers in Canada are a self-imposed obstacle that stifles economic potential. These barriers, in the form of differing regulations and standards, create inefficiencies and restrict the free flow of goods, services, and labor. Addressing these would not only enhance domestic productivity but also prepare Canada to better withstand external economic pressures.

News: Split on U.S. tariffs, premiers agree to focus on dismantling interprovincial trade barriers

October 17, 2024

Meanwhile, Ford’s government faces significant domestic challenges, particularly in healthcare and housing. Ontario’s healthcare system is under strain, with long wait times and resource shortages affecting patient care. The housing crisis continues to escalate, with affordability and availability issues persisting across the province. These are critical areas that demand focused attention and effective policy solutions, yet they seem overshadowed by the political theater of an unnecessary electoral mandate.

In essence, Ford’s election call seems more a maneuver to consolidate power rather than a genuine effort to address the economic challenges posed by U.S. tariffs. What Canada truly needs is strategic leadership that prioritizes internal economic reforms and external diversification. By focusing on these substantive issues, Canadian leaders can enhance national resilience and secure a more stable economic future.

The path forward requires vision and collaboration, not electoral distractions. It’s time to move beyond political posturing and focus on the real work needed to strengthen Canada’s economy from within.

Interprovincial trade barriers might not be the most sexy topic, but they could be the secret weapon Canada needs to counteract the financial strain from U.S. tariffs. These barriers have been a thorn in Canada’s side since Confederation, and while they don’t grab headlines, tackling them could make a real difference.

When a tariff crisis hits, it’s tempting for politicians to make a big show of calling elections and casting tariffs as the villain. Yet the real challenge—and opportunity—lies in bringing provinces together to break down these old trade walls.

“Economic force”, as Donald Trump has called it, in the form of tariffs, would mean trouble for consumers on both sides of the border, leading to job losses and economic pain. Canada, being the smaller player, will ultimately suffer more in this exchange.

To strengthen its position, Canada should look beyond North America and build trade relationships with friendlier markets. At the same time, cutting through the red tape of interprovincial trade is a crucial, though often overlooked, move that could boost the economy.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s call for an election in response to tariffs seems more like political theatre than a real solution. He’s learned from the great Guru of distraction who’s the new leader down south. An election diverts attention from RCMP investigations and urgent issues like healthcare and housing that need urgent fixing. Instead of playing games, Canada needs to focus on real change: diversifying trade and tearing down those internal trade barriers. By doing so, Canada can stand stronger and more independently, ready to face whatever comes its way.

But no, Dougie Ford has to revert to his teen brain and thrust us into a provincial election.

Please enjoy the January 23, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday January 10, 2025

January 10, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday January 10, 2025

Pierre Poilievre’s Path in Canadian Politics

January 8, 2025

As Canada stands on the brink of a significant political transition, Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party, finds himself at a pivotal moment. The resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the ensuing Liberal leadership race, and the impending return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency have created a complex landscape that demands nuanced navigation. Poilievre’s approach, characterized by populist rhetoric and a focus on critiquing Liberal policies, must evolve to address the multifaceted challenges that lie ahead.

February 13, 2017

Poilievre’s political strategy has largely revolved around painting a picture of a “broken” Canada under Trudeau’s leadership. His catchy slogans, such as “Axe the Tax,” resonate with voters frustrated by economic and environmental policies they perceive as burdensome. However, as the political dynamics shift with Trudeau’s departure, Poilievre’s reliance on populist rhetoric may prove insufficient. The challenge now is to pivot from slogans to substantive policy discussions that address the real concerns of Canadians.

Opinion: Poilievre’s dissing of Canada plays into Trump’s hands

December 5, 2024

The return of Donald Trump to the Oval Office presents a unique challenge for Canada-U.S. relations. Trump’s provocative statements about Canada becoming the 51st state, though implausible, underscore the power imbalance between the two nations. Poilievre’s shared populist tendencies with Trump may not translate into better relations. As Debra Thompson points out, Trump’s focus is not on ideology but on loyalty, rendering him largely unmanageable by either Canadian leader.

Trudeau’s resignation has opened the door for a new Liberal leader—potentially Chrystia Freeland or Mark Carney—who could appeal to centrist voters and challenge Poilievre’s populist appeal. As Konrad Yakabuski highlights, Poilievre’s strategy, centered on attacking Trudeau, must now adapt to confront a potentially revitalized Liberal Party. This shift presents an opportunity for Poilievre to engage in a battle of ideas rather than relying solely on criticism and slogans.

December 3, 2024

In this era of political and economic uncertainty, the key challenge for any Canadian leader is to protect the nation’s interests without succumbing to external pressures. Poilievre’s task is to navigate a political culture that values stability, compromise, and sovereignty. As Canada faces potential volatility from American policies, Poilievre must prioritize safeguarding Canada’s hard-won independence and focus on domestic strengths.

Opinion: Poilievre will need a new playbook as the Liberals pull their quarterback

October 17, 2024

Public opinion on Poilievre is divided. Some view him as a necessary change from the Trudeau era, while others criticize his populist tactics and lack of substantive policy proposals. Concerns about his qualifications and experience echo in reader comments, alongside skepticism about his ability to lead Canada through complex international relations.

Pierre Poilievre stands at a critical juncture in Canadian politics. As the nation prepares for an election that could redefine its leadership, Poilievre’s ability to adapt his strategy and engage in meaningful policy debates will be crucial. The path forward requires balancing populist appeal with pragmatic solutions that address the diverse needs of Canadians. In navigating these challenges, Poilievre has the opportunity to redefine his leadership and shape Canada’s future in a rapidly changing world.

It’s hard to ignore the impact Pierre Poilievre’s slogan “Axe the Tax” has had on his rise in the polls. For months now, this mantra has resonated with Canadians feeling the squeeze from rising interest rates, inflation, and grocery prices. It’s a powerful message that taps into the frustrations of many, convincing them that the government’s carbon pricing scheme is the root cause of their struggles. However, the real question is: what comes next?

Poilievre has yet to outline any concrete plans once he “axes the tax.” His stance on climate change is particularly concerning; he seems to downplay the crisis and lacks a comprehensive climate policy. In a recent press conference, he dismissed potential leadership rivals as “just another Justin Trudeau,” but when it comes to climate issues, he resembles Stephen Harper more than he might care to admit.

With the political landscape shifting—especially with Justin Trudeau’s resignation and Donald Trump’s looming presidency—Poilievre finds himself at a crucial juncture. He must evolve his approach beyond populist rhetoric and engage in meaningful policy discussions. With new Liberal figures like Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney ready to appeal to centrist voters, the challenge for Poilievre will be to protect Canadian interests while navigating external pressures, particularly from the U.S.

As we watch this unfold, it’s essential for all of us to stay informed and engaged. The future of Canadian politics may hinge on how leaders like Poilievre adapt to these complex challenges.

Enjoy the January 10, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday or Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday September 20, 2024

September 20, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday September 20, 2024

Link to the animated version.

Trump’s Imaginary Faucet: When Rhetoric Spills Over Into Canadian Politics

June 23, 2016

In a stump speech in California, Donald Trump recently painted a vivid picture of a “very large faucet” that would redirect Canada’s freshwater into the United States to combat wildfires. It’s a comical notion—both physically and politically impossible—but it hints at a deeper issue that Canadians should take seriously: the blurry line between foreign influence and interference, especially when American rhetoric starts to seep into Canadian political discourse.

News: Why Donald Trump wants to turn a ‘very large faucet’ to get Canadian freshwater

Trump’s “faucet” gaffe might seem like harmless bluster, the latest in a string of bizarre comments from a man known for his unorthodox speeches. But the idea of tapping into Canadian resources, even in jest, taps into real fears Canadians have about being muscled by their southern neighbour. And those fears aren’t unfounded. Although the Columbia River, which Trump likely refers to, could theoretically be diverted in the U.S. portion, Canada’s water has long been coveted. However, thanks to stringent legislation and international agreements, bulk water exports are banned for environmental reasons. So, no, California won’t be siphoning Canada’s water supply any time soon.

July 23, 2019

But why is this worth more than just a chuckle? Trump’s rhetoric—no matter how absurd—often has a way of trickling down into more serious discussions, even when it doesn’t seem to make sense. For instance, it’s not entirely uncommon to see elements of Trumpism echoed in Canadian politics, especially among right-leaning politicians who tap into populist anger. Pierre Poilievre, leader of Canada’s Conservative Party, doesn’t embrace full Trumpism, but his style has drawn comparisons, even if his policies remain far more moderate.

August 25, 2016

This brings us to a critical distinction that Canadians need to make between influence and interference. Influence is something Canada has always faced, especially from its southern neighbour.

American pop culture, political movements, and economic trends have influenced Canadians for decades. Interference, on the other hand, refers to direct attempts by foreign actors—be it China, Russia, or even domestic meddling—to shape Canadian political outcomes covertly or illegally. The foreign interference inquiry currently underway in Canada underscores how serious this threat has become.

January 30, 2024

But as Poilievre navigates the waters of populism, drawing occasionally on American-style rhetoric, he faces a fine line. His attacks on “elites” and his more combative tone against Trudeau hint at a kind of political mimicry that channels the populist playbook of Trump and his ilk. Yet, Poilievre’s populism is much more subdued than Trump’s chaotic firebrand style. Unlike Trump, Poilievre hasn’t called for drastic measures like building walls or slashing immigration; in fact, his policies on housing and inflation remain fairly traditional, even if dressed up in anti-elite rhetoric.

Analysis: Canada’s polite Trumpism

This leads to an uncomfortable question: when does American-style influence in Canadian politics cross into interference? Poilievre’s populism may appeal to some of the same sentiments as Trump’s base, but Canada’s political system has so far proven more resilient to extremist rhetoric. This is largely because Canadian populism has different roots—focused on regionalism, economic frustration, and cost-of-living concerns—rather than the nativism and cultural battles that define Trumpism.

Tuesday December 19, 2023

However, by flirting with Trump’s brand of rhetoric, Canadian politicians risk letting influence blur into interference, especially if it starts shaping policy or public perception in unhealthy ways. After all, what begins as echoing talking points can quickly spiral into real political movements, fuelled by misinformation and division.

So, while Trump’s faucet talk may be nothing more than rhetorical fluff, it’s a reminder that Canadians need to stay vigilant. We can afford to laugh at Trump’s bizarre imagery, but we should be wary of the subtle ways his influence is shaping the tone of our politics. Canada has worked hard to maintain its political independence and resist the kind of far-right extremism that’s taken hold in other Western democracies, but that resilience shouldn’t be taken for granted.

At the end of the day, Trump’s imaginary faucet may never be turned on, but the flood of American political rhetoric, seeping across our borders, shows no signs of stopping. Canadians must be careful not to let that faucet drown out their own democratic values. (AI)

Saturday April 13, 2024

April 13, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 13, 2024

The Peril of Blind Faith in Leaders

In the turbulent landscape of Canadian politics, the trajectory of leaders often mirrors the ebb and flow of public sentiment. From Justin Trudeau’s buoyant “Sunny Ways” to Pierre Poilievre’s resolute call to “Axe the Tax,” the resonance of political slogans underscores the power of messaging in shaping public perception. Yet, behind the rallying cries lies a cautionary tale of blind faith and the perils of placing unwavering trust in charismatic figures.

Abacus Data Poll: Conservatives open up their largest lead yet

September 28, 2012

Trudeau’s ascent to prominence in 2015 was marked by the optimistic promise of “Sunny Ways,” an ode borrowed from Wilfrid Laurier that evoked a spirit of positivity and inclusivity. The rallying cry encapsulated Trudeau’s appeal as a unifier, promising a departure from the adversarial politics of the past. Canadians embraced this vision of hope, drawn to Trudeau’s youthful energy and progressive agenda.

However, the stark realities of governance soon tempered the sunny optimism. Promises of electoral reform faltered, controversies emerged, and disillusionment crept into the public consciousness. The fall from grace was a stark reminder that political charisma alone cannot sustain enduring trust.

June 14, 2022

Today, we witness the rise of Pierre Poilievre, whose mantra to “Axe the Tax” resonates with disaffected segments of society grappling with economic challenges. Poilievre’s unapologetic stance against carbon pricing embodies a populist fervour, tapping into frustrations over rising costs of living and government interventions. The simplicity of “Axe the Tax” belies deeper complexities, yet it strikes a chord with those yearning for decisive action.

As Poilievre’s star ascends, it is imperative to heed the lessons of history. Political slogans, while captivating, should not serve as substitutes for critical analysis and informed scrutiny. The allure of a bold disruptor must be tempered with a healthy dose of skepticism, recognizing that governance demands more than catchy phrases and populist appeals.

Analysis: Poilievre’s Youth: Meet the young voters supporting the Conservatives

September 1, 2018

The parallel trajectories of Trudeau’s “Sunny Ways” and Poilievre’s “Axe the Tax” highlight the cyclical nature of political fervour. The initial euphoria of a new era often gives way to sobering realities, underscoring the importance of vigilant citizenship and active engagement.

The pitfalls of blind faith in leaders are manifold. It fosters a cult of personality that prioritizes rhetoric over substance, stifles dissent, and discourages nuanced discourse. By succumbing to the allure of political slogans, we risk overlooking the complexities of governance and the need for evidence-based policymaking.

In an era marked by uncertainty and rapid change, the imperative for critical analysis cannot be overstated. As Pierre Poilievre garners support with his rallying cry, let us approach with discernment and vigilance. Let us challenge oversimplifications and demand substantive solutions that address the complexities of our times.

March 5, 2012

The narrative of political leadership is a dynamic interplay of ideals and realities. By embracing skepticism and eschewing blind faith, we honour the principles of democracy and empower ourselves as vigilant stewards of our collective future.

In the pursuit of a resilient democracy, let skepticism be our compass and critical analysis our guiding light. As slogans come and go, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to informed engagement and unwavering scrutiny, recognizing that true progress demands more than mere adulation—it requires diligent citizenship and an unwavering dedication to the common good.

Together, let us navigate the currents of politics with clarity and foresight, ensuring that the lessons of history guide us towards a future shaped by informed decision-making and principled leadership. (AI)

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try: