privatization – mackaycartoons

Wednesday February 12, 2025

February 12, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday February 12, 2025 (also, The Toronto Star.)

Doug Ford’s Abysmal Healthcare Performance in Ontario

September 26, 2024

Healthcare in Ontario has been a hot topic for years, and under Doug Ford’s leadership, the debate has only heated up. As election promises flood in from all parties, each claiming to fix the family doctor shortage and other issues, it’s important to examine what the current government has done—and hasn’t done—about healthcare.

Doug Ford’s time in office has seen plenty of criticism for how healthcare has been handled. Emergency rooms are closing more often, especially in rural areas, leaving people with fewer options when they need urgent care. The problem of finding family doctors has only grown, with millions more Ontarians expected to lose their family doctor soon. For people like Louise Lee and her family, this means a constant struggle to find basic medical care.

Analysis: 2024 worst year for Ontario ER closures, CBC analysis finds

May 19, 2023

Instead of focusing on these urgent healthcare needs, Ford’s government has been accused of chasing short-term, flashy policies. Expanding beer sales in convenience stores seemed to take priority over real healthcare reform, raising questions about what truly matters to this administration.

Privatization efforts have also worried many. By shifting funding towards private providers, there’s a risk that healthcare could become less accessible and affordable, potentially leading to a system where only those who can pay get the best care.
Promises to end hallway medicine have yet to materialize, with overcrowded hospitals still a common issue. This failure to deliver on key promises is part of a larger pattern of unmet commitments.

March 1, 2023

While appointing Dr. Jane Philpott to oversee primary care access was a positive step, it doesn’t address the bigger issues without a full strategy in place.

As the election approaches, political parties are offering solutions to Ontario’s healthcare problems. Bonnie Crombie’s Liberals want to bring in 3,100 family doctors by 2029, spending $3.1 billion. Doug Ford’s Conservatives plan to create 305 new primary care teams to help two million more Ontarians, with $1.8 billion in funding. Marit Stiles and the NDP promise to recruit 3,500 new doctors, spending $4.05 billion—the boldest plan of all.

These promises are supported by additional federal funding, with Justin Trudeau’s government committing $11.4 billion over 10 years to Ontario’s healthcare. This money aims to support team-based care models, which could make the system more efficient.

Analysis: Ontario parties are promising family doctors for all

August 19, 2022

But there’s plenty of doubt. How will these parties find all the new doctors they promise? Can they really fix the problems that have been around for decades?

The truth is, Ontario’s healthcare system has been declining for years, and it’s not just Ford’s fault. Long-standing issues like underfunding, an aging population, and workforce challenges have all played a part. Our healthcare system struggles to keep up with modern demands.

Election promises alone won’t bring the big changes needed. We need a long-term plan, backed by solid policies and cooperation across political lines, to truly improve Ontario’s healthcare. This plan must focus on fair access, updated infrastructure, and fixing systemic problems.

January 27, 2021

As voters prepare to make their choice, it’s important to look closely at what all parties are promising. Doug Ford’s record on healthcare shows many challenges, and while some new proposals give hope, they need to be realistic and impactful. Ontario’s healthcare system needs more than quick fixes or campaign talk; it requires a real commitment to lasting improvement. Only then can we hope to turn things around and build a healthcare system that works for everyone in Ontario.

Ontario’s Election – Continued: Ford Focus

I don’t think you have to be from Ontario to understand it. Public health care is undergoing significant challenges not just in this province, but across Canada and around the world where universal healthcare is crumbling. The struggles with doctor and nursing shortages, long wait times for procedures, and overcrowded emergency rooms are issues that many regions are grappling with, not just Doug Ford’s Ontario.

And let’s be real, if politicians want to brand themselves as superheroes, editorial cartoonists are definitely going to play along! I keep saying it, but we are facing an unnecessary election in Ontario right now. Just like President Trump has a knack for drawing attention to himself, Doug Ford seems to be trying to distract voters from his own record by shifting focus to Trump. Honestly, leave the Trump distractions to the Feds, Doug, and focus on defending your own record!

This piece took me back to those classic Superman episodes, and I hope you enjoy it as much as I enjoyed putting it together. And if you’re a voter in Ontario, don’t be part of the apathetic 57% who didn’t bother to cast a ballot last time! It’s so important to get informed and make your voice heard. Mark your calendars—election day is on February 27, 2025. Let’s make sure we all step up and participate in shaping the future of our province!

Please enjoy the February 12, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday July 25, 2024

July 26, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday July 25, 2024

The Risks of Privatization in Ontario’s Healthcare and Alcohol Distribution

Recent policy changes by the Ontario government under Premier Doug Ford mark a significant shift towards privatization and deregulation, raising concerns about long-term implications for public welfare. The expansion of pharmacists’ powers to prescribe medications for common ailments and the increased availability of alcohol in private retail outlets, such as grocery and corner stores, are touted as solutions to alleviate pressure on the public healthcare system and enhance consumer convenience. However, these moves may create more problems than they solve.

Expanding pharmacists’ powers to prescribe drugs for conditions like strep throat is intended to reduce the burden on family doctors and emergency rooms amid a severe shortage of healthcare providers. With around 2.5 million Ontarians lacking access to a family doctor, this measure appears to provide a quick fix. However, it overlooks the complexity and risks associated with diagnosing and treating medical conditions.

News: Ontario looking to give more power to pharmacists, as billing concerns haunt one program they oversee

April 9, 2024

Pharmacists, despite their extensive training, are not equipped with the same diagnostic tools or depth of medical training as doctors. They may end up prescribing treatments based on symptoms alone, potentially leading to misdiagnosis and inappropriate medication use. For instance, sore throats and rashes can have multiple causes, including viral infections that do not require antibiotics. Overprescription of antibiotics can lead to resistance and other health issues, underscoring the necessity of accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Critics argue that this move is a step towards privatization, diverting patients from publicly funded healthcare to private sector solutions. It risks creating a two-tier healthcare system where access to care depends on one’s ability to pay, fundamentally undermining the principles of universal healthcare.

July 19, 2024

The decision to expand alcohol sales to include convenience stores, grocery stores, and big-box retailers aims to provide greater access and convenience for consumers. However, this comes at a significant financial cost, with the government allocating up to $225 million to support this transition, including a substantial payout to The Beer Store to assist in the shift.

While this policy might seem beneficial for consumers, it raises questions about public health and safety. Increasing the availability of alcohol can lead to higher consumption rates, which are associated with a range of social and health problems, including addiction, accidents, and long-term health issues. The move also diverts significant public funds that could potentially be used to address pressing needs within the public healthcare system, such as improving access to family doctors and maintaining emergency services in rural areas.

These policy changes reflect a broader trend towards deregulation and privatization under the Ford government, prioritizing short-term solutions over sustainable, long-term strategies. While the immediate benefits of reduced wait times and increased convenience are appealing, they come with substantial risks and costs that may exacerbate existing problems.

Analysis: Ontario’s ‘alcohol deficit’ to grow with expanded sales: expert

March 1, 2023

By shifting responsibilities from public institutions to the private sector, the government risks creating a fragmented healthcare system where the quality and accessibility of care are uneven and dependent on private market dynamics. This approach fails to address the root causes of issues such as healthcare provider shortages and underfunded public services, instead opting for quick fixes that may ultimately lead to greater inequities and inefficiencies.

Analysis: I’ve seen what a functioning health care system needs and it’s not more downloading to pharmacies

Young Doug Ford: The Series

Ontario’s move towards expanding pharmacists’ powers and privatizing alcohol distribution raises significant concerns about the long-term impacts on public health and welfare. These policies, while seemingly beneficial in the short term, may undermine the principles of universal healthcare and public responsibility, leading to a more privatized and potentially inequitable system. It is crucial to critically assess these changes and consider whether they truly serve the best interests of Ontarians or merely offer a temporary reprieve at a considerable future cost. (AI)

Friday July 19, 2024

July 19, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday July 19, 2024

Concerns Over Ontario’s Alcohol Market Liberalization Under Doug Ford

December 15, 2023

The ongoing strike at the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO), coupled with Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s aggressive push to expand alcohol sales, raises significant concerns about the future of Ontario’s alcohol market and its implications for taxpayers and consumers.

The LCBO, a longstanding institution in Ontario since its establishment in the post-prohibition era, has faced criticism for its monopolistic structure and perceived inefficiencies. The strike by nearly 10,000 LCBO workers, represented by the Ontario Public Service Employees Union (OPSEU), underscores deep-seated concerns about job security, wages, and the broader impact of Ford’s policies.

News: Doug Ford optimistic as contract talks resume in LCBO strike

March 4, 2015

Ford’s administration has moved swiftly to accelerate the liberalization of Ontario’s alcohol sales, allowing ready-to-drink beverages in grocery stores and planning further expansions to convenience stores. While these changes were initially introduced under the previous Liberal government, Ford’s approach has sparked skepticism about the motives and potential outcomes.

September 24, 2015

Critics argue that the rapid liberalization could undermine the LCBO’s role in generating crucial revenue for public services. The LCBO annually contributes billions to Ontario’s coffers, funding essential programs in healthcare, education, and community initiatives. The fear is that privatizing alcohol sales could diminish this reliable revenue stream, leading to increased taxes or reduced services to make up for the shortfall.

Moreover, there are concerns about the beneficiaries of Ford’s policies. His track record with controversial decisions, such as alterations to the greenbelt and executive appointments, has fueled suspicions that the push to liberalize alcohol sales could primarily benefit private businesses and Ford’s political allies rather than Ontario’s residents.

News: Restaurants, bars frustrated with LCBO strike as negotiations resume

April 9, 2024

The current strike has highlighted logistical challenges, with businesses experiencing shortages and disruptions in alcohol supply. This has impacted not only consumer choice but also the economic stability of sectors reliant on alcohol sales, such as hospitality and tourism.

The question remains: Is Ontario’s alcohol market truly being modernized for the benefit of consumers and the economy, or is it a scheme that risks leaving taxpayers and consumers on the losing end? The lack of transparency and public consultation surrounding these changes adds to the skepticism.

While there may be merit in updating Ontario’s alcohol distribution system to reflect modern consumer preferences, the process must prioritize transparency, fairness, and protection of public interests. Without these assurances, the rush to dismantle the LCBO’s monopoly raises valid concerns about the future of public revenue, consumer rights, and the equitable distribution of benefits across Ontario’s communities. As the strike continues, Ontarians deserve clarity and accountability from their government to ensure that any reforms serve the public good rather than narrow private interests. (AI)

Wednesday March 1, 2023

March 1, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday March 1, 2023

Sliding toward a new reality in health care

January 17, 2023

According to an Ipsos opinion poll released in February, more Canadians than ever are open to the idea of private-sector delivery of publicly-funded health-care service. Not only did the poll find 59 per cent of respondents support private delivery, 60 per cent supported the idea of private care for those who can afford it.

But wait — just a couple of months earlier half of the respondents to an Angus Reid Institute poll said more private care options would a negative impact on the system, with only 32 per cent believing private options would improve things.

Vagaries of methodology and ideology aside, what’s going on here. Could both things be true? Neither?

It’s a relevant discussion as Ontario and other provinces look to the private sector to deliver more services, reducing wait times and allowing more people to get needed care. But how much private-sector involvement is too much? When does the Canada Health Act, the blueprint for universal health care, become more of a suggestion than the rule?

It certainly doesn’t help when governments, in particular the Ontario government, are more interested in promoting their preferred ideological and political outcome than in providing straight answers.

August 19, 2022

Consider Premier Doug Ford’s promise that Ontarians will always be able to access care with their “health card not a credit card.” Lovely sentiment, but is it true?

There is a lot of private-sector delivery of health services already in the market, so no one can credibly claim private delivery doesn’t work. But increasingly there are some grey areas that should make us worry.

For example, consider the pediatric practice in Toronto that offers same-day virtual access to registered practical nurse services, but only to people willing to pay a monthly subscription and per visit fee. Yes, sick young patients will be seen regardless, but if you want to be sure of same-day virtual care and in-person consultation within a day or so, you need to pay.

Without casting aspersions, does that really sound like equitable access to care, as described in the Canada Health Act? Or does it sound more like real two-tier care, one tier for those who can afford it, the other for those who cannot?

January 18, 2023

There are other anecdotal examples, including some where people say they’ve been told they can get access to services and procedures, but it might take a year or more, unless they want to pay in which case they can get access in short order.

Some tiered service has existed for years now, such as in cataract surgery, where patients are offered different options for lenses, one covered by OHIP, others not and available if you can afford them or have insurance coverage.

The point here is not to denigrate services, patients or providers dealing with this changing landscape. It is that the system is evolving, in real time, without much reflection, debate or study. We’re sliding toward a different health-care universe, and it’s happening largely by stealth. That’s not the he way it should be, nor is it a prescription for success or public buy-in. (Hamilton Spectator Editorial)

Saturday February 3, 2023

February 4, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday February 3, 2023

Ottawa contracts comprise up to 10 per cent of McKinsey Canadian revenue

Global management consulting giant McKinsey and Company says its contracts with the federal government make up as much as 10 per cent of its gross revenue in Canada.

June 17, 2017

The Canadian revenue figures for McKinsey’s Canadian operations, contained in a U.S. court filing, show how integral federal government contracts are to the New York-based firm, which has offices in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver.

McKinsey’s contracts with Ottawa are being investigated by the House of Commons committee on government operations and estimates, because of the company’s ties to the Liberal government and the many international controversies in which it has been involved.

The Globe and Mail has reported that the total value of federal contracts awarded to McKinsey since 2015 is at least $116.8-million, up from a previous estimate of $101.4-million provided by the government earlier this month.

The filing was made in May, as part of a court case in Puerto Rico. The document lists many of McKinsey’s significant clients in different countries.

January 15, 2013

The court documents also say that private-sector clients – such as Montreal-based Bombardier, Toronto Dominion Bank, Mastercard, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Canadian Tire, Shell PLC and State Street Corporation – each accounted for 1.01 per cent to 5 per cent of McKinsey Canada’s revenue during the same period.

The filing mentions individual United States government departments. For instance, the U.S. Department of Defence is listed as accounting for 20.01 per cent to 25 per cent of the gross revenue for McKinsey’s Washington branch during the period from March 1, 2021 through Feb. 28, 2022.

Alley Adams, head of external relations at McKinsey Canada, said contracts awarded to the firm represent a small share of the Canadian government’s outsourcing compared to other consulting firms. Deloitte, Ernst and Young, KPMG and PricewaterhouseCoopers were paid a combined total of about $338-million in 2020-21 and $354-million in 2021-22, according to a Carleton University analysis.

Jennifer Carr, president of the Professional Institute of the Public Service, told MPs the growth in outsourcing ends up costing taxpayers and is hurting morale among federal workers. (The Globe & Mail)