progress

Wednesday March 19, 2025

Wednesday March 19, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday March 19, 2025

Pierre Poilievre’s Plan to Undo Carbon Pricing: A Step Backward for Canada’s Climate Commitment

The escalating impacts of climate change, symbolized by metaphorical "Four Horsemen" including extreme heat gripping continents from North America to Asia, underscore the urgent need for global action to mitigate rising temperatures and their profound consequences on human health, infrastructure, and ecosystems.

June 20, 2024

As the climate crisis intensifies, countries around the world are working hard to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and meet international targets. Many progressive industrial nations have adopted carbon pricing as a crucial part of their strategy to combat climate change. However, Pierre Poilievre’s plan to eliminate carbon pricing in Canada risks reversing the progress we’ve made and could harm our reputation on the global stage.

Carbon pricing is an important tool that encourages businesses to cut emissions by making it cost-effective to invest in cleaner technologies. By putting a price on carbon emissions, we motivate companies to adopt greener practices, ultimately benefiting both the environment and the economy. Poilievre’s opposition to this approach shows a reluctance to embrace the necessary steps for a sustainable future for Canadians.

News: Net zero by 2050 ‘impossible’ for UK, says Badenoch

July 21, 2022

A worrying trend among conservative leaders is emerging globally, as highlighted by Kemi Badenoch’s recent comments in the UK. Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, stated that achieving the UK’s net zero target by 2050 is “impossible” without harming living standards or bankrupting the country. This marks a significant departure from the previous political agreement on the importance of addressing climate change. By aligning with such views, Poilievre risks placing Canada among those countries that are stepping back from their environmental responsibilities.

It’s also worth noting that Canadian conservatives once had a more forward-thinking approach. Under Erin O’Toole’s leadership, the Conservative Party supported carbon pricing as part of a broader climate strategy. O’Toole recognized the need for a carbon pricing system to drive innovation and reduce emissions. However, with Poilievre now leading the party, it has shifted back to outright opposition to carbon pricing, which is a significant step backwards.

August 13, 2021

If Canada rolls back carbon pricing, we could find ourselves among the nations failing to meet their climate commitments. This move would significantly hinder our ability to achieve the net-zero emissions target by 2050, which is essential for tackling climate change. Without a solid pricing mechanism, businesses may lack the motivation to innovate or shift to lower-carbon options.

Moreover, eliminating carbon pricing would damage public trust in Canada’s commitment to international agreements like the Paris Accord. As other countries advance their climate policies, Canada risks being seen as disengaged from the global effort to address climate change. This perception could hurt our international relationships and competitiveness in a world that increasingly values sustainability.

The revenue generated from carbon pricing is also crucial for funding green projects, public transportation, and renewable energy initiatives. Poilievre’s plan to scrap this revenue would rob Canada of essential funding needed to transition to a low-carbon economy, jeopardizing job creation in the green sector.

News: Poilievre says he would repeal federal carbon pricing for industrial emissions

June 2, 2017

In contrast to Poilievre’s vision, maintaining and strengthening carbon pricing would show leadership in climate action. It would send a clear message that Canada is serious about its environmental responsibilities and is committed to a sustainable future.

Pierre Poilievre’s plan to undo carbon pricing is a step backward that could undermine our climate commitments and hinder our ability to meet global targets. It aligns with a troubling trend among conservative leaders who prioritize economic concerns over environmental protection, as seen in the UK with Badenoch’s remarks. It also represents a retreat from the more progressive stance taken by former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole, who understood the importance of carbon pricing. Canada must remain a leader in the fight against climate change, embracing policies that promote innovation and accountability. The time has come to stand firm in our commitment to a sustainable future and reject proposals that seek to undermine our progress. The future of our planet depends on it.

Make Canada a Climate Laggard Again

If there’s one thing we can say about Justin Trudeau’s legacy, it’s that he put a price on carbon—something that had been debated and denied for years, especially under Stephen Harper’s government. Choosing not to commit to carbon pricing put Canada on the global map of climate laggards, alongside countries that talk a big game about caring for the planet but never actually take meaningful action. It was a pretty embarrassing time for us, especially when we were aligning ourselves with the “drill baby drill” mentality of climate deniers in the U.S.

Now, it feels like we’re sliding back into that old mindset with our own Conservative Party. Just when Canada is trying to set itself apart from the U.S. and connect with progressive partners who genuinely care about climate action, Pierre Poilievre pushed hard to axe the consumer carbon tax, got what he wanted just last week when the new PM Mark Carney did that very thing. Now, Poilievre is calling for the elimination of the industrial carbon tax as well. It’s got people questioning: if there’s no price on carbon, what real action does the Conservative Party plan to take on climate change? This stance could very well make them unelectable come 2025.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

 

Thursday April 4, 2024

Doug Ford's habitual resistance to progressive change, spanning from affordable housing to environmental conservation and social issues, impedes Ontario's progress and collective well-being, underscoring the need for inclusive leadership and collaboration.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday April 4, 2024

Doug Ford’s Habit of Resistance: A Barrier to Progress

Doug Ford's steadfast opposition to four-plexes reflects a shortsighted approach to housing policy that fails to address Ontario's affordability crisis and stifles the potential for inclusive, sustainable communities.

March 23, 2024

In the political landscape of Ontario, one figure has consistently emerged as a symbol of resistance: Doug Ford, the Premier of Ontario. Since assuming office, Ford has developed a reputation for opposing a multitude of initiatives, often to the detriment of progress and the well-being of Ontarians. His propensity to resist change has become a defining characteristic of his leadership, hindering efforts to address critical issues facing the province.

From affordable housing to environmental conservation, Doug Ford seems to find himself on the opposite side of the fence, quite literally at times. His staunch opposition to initiatives aimed at tackling housing affordability, particularly in urban areas, underscores his resistance to innovative solutions. Rather than embracing measures like “gentle density” that could alleviate the housing crisis, Ford opts for maintaining the status quo, disregarding the pressing need for change.

News: Ontario will not introduce legislation that automatically approves fourplexes, Ford says

Doug Ford's $1.3 billion funding plan for Ontario's universities and colleges is deemed insufficient and short-sighted, failing to address long-standing structural underfunding issues in post-secondary education.

March 9, 2024

Environmental conservation efforts have also faced Ford’s unyielding resistance. His attempts to open up parts of the protected Greenbelt for development, despite widespread outcry from environmentalists and concerned citizens, exemplify his disregard for preserving natural landscapes and biodiversity. Ford’s shortsightedness in prioritizing development over environmental sustainability highlights a dangerous pattern of resistance to measures crucial for future generations.

Moreover, Doug Ford’s opposition extends beyond specific policies to encompass broader social issues. He has shown reluctance to support initiatives promoting LGBTQ+ rights, Indigenous sovereignty, and anti-racism efforts, further underscoring his tendency to resist progressive change. By aligning himself with regressive ideologies and obstructing initiatives aimed at promoting equality and inclusion, Ford perpetuates division and inequality within Ontario’s diverse communities.

Analysis: A grim report about climate change in Ontario was kept quiet for 8 months

May 14, 2019

While some may argue that resistance to certain policies is a natural aspect of politics, Doug Ford’s habitual opposition transcends mere disagreement. It reflects a deeper reluctance to adapt to evolving societal needs and challenges, instead clinging to outdated ideologies and entrenched interests. In doing so, Ford perpetuates a cycle of stagnation and divisiveness that impedes the progress of Ontario as a whole.

As Ontarians, we deserve leadership that is receptive to new ideas, responsive to the needs of all citizens, and committed to advancing the common good. Doug Ford’s pattern of resistance stands in stark contrast to these principles, serving as a barrier to progress and a hindrance to the collective well-being of our province. It is time for a shift away from resistance and towards collaboration, innovation, and inclusive leadership that truly reflects the values and aspirations of all Ontarians. (AI)

Thursday January 18, 2024

Canada faces challenges, but rejecting the notion of a broken nation, it's crucial to avoid regressive remedies and instead focus on forward-looking, collaborative solutions to strengthen the country.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday January 18, 2024

Navigating Challenges: Canada’s Resilience Amidst Change

Pierre Poilievre's reliance on sloganeering, notably seen in his "Ax the Tax" rhetoric against carbon pricing, masks the insufficiency of his technology-focused energy proposals to effectively tackle the urgent climate crisis and meet Canada's Paris Agreement commitments.

November 8, 2023

In recent times, the narrative of a “broken” Canada has gained traction, fuelled by challenges such as inflation, rising interest rates, and a housing crisis. While it’s undeniable that these issues pose significant hurdles, it is crucial to reject the notion that Canada is a failed state. Pierre Poilievre’s diagnosis may oversimplify our complex situation, and his proposed remedy risks dismantling the progress we’ve made.

News: Poilievre says ‘everything seems broken,’ Trudeau hits back

Canada is facing economic challenges, including inflation, which has led to higher interest rates, putting strain on the cost of living. The housing crisis further compounds these difficulties. However, acknowledging these challenges does not equate to declaring the nation broken. Instead, it demonstrates the resilience of the Canadian people and the need for thoughtful, forward-looking solutions.

The heightened rhetoric against undocumented immigrants by global leaders, including Canada's Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, underscores concerns about the potential impact on compassionate immigration policies, emphasizing the need for a nuanced approach that prioritizes both economic interests and humanitarian considerations.

Tuesday December 19, 2023

Pierre Poilievre’s assertion that Canada is broken comes with a proposed remedy that seems eerily regressive. Turning back the clock to a time before the progress made in social, economic, and environmental policies risks jeopardizing the very foundations that have defined Canada as a beacon of stability and inclusivity.

The call for a return to conservative values might resonate with some, but it’s essential to recognize that progress should not be viewed through a partisan lens. The challenges we face require innovative and collaborative solutions that address the root causes of our current predicaments. While the Conservative leader advocates for a metaphorical wrecking ball, it is imperative to question whether such an approach will truly rebuild and enhance our nation.

Canada’s strength lies in its ability to adapt and overcome challenges. Rather than succumbing to doomsday rhetoric, we should approach our obstacles with a sense of collective responsibility and a commitment to building a more equitable and sustainable future.

September 9, 2023

In addressing issues like inflation and the housing crisis, it is crucial to foster open dialogue and bipartisan cooperation. Finger-pointing and oversimplified solutions will only serve to deepen divisions and hinder progress. Canada is not broken; it is a nation facing challenges that demand thoughtful, pragmatic, and inclusive solutions.

As we navigate through these challenges, let us remember the words of former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, who, on his recent 90th birthday celebration, reminded us that Canada, despite its imperfections, is a country that many around the globe envy. The key is to build on our strengths, learn from our mistakes, and continue striving for a better, more resilient Canada. (AI)

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor – The Hamilton Spectator, Monday January 22, 2024

Poilievre will straighten things out

Re: Jan. 18 cartoon

I take exception to Graeme MacKay’s political cartoon depiction in The Spec’s Jan. 18 edition. Indeed, the country is broken, but why paint Pierre Poilievre with a black brush when he hasn’t had a chance to straighten out this country? The cartoonist neglected to add corruption, division, patronage appointments, uncontrolled immigration policies and restriction of the principles of freedom to the depicted building structure.

Allan Avery, Binbrook

From sketch to finish, see the current way Graeme completes an editorial cartoon using an iPencil, the Procreate app, and a couple of cheats on an iPad Pro. If you’re creative, give illustration a try:

Saturday May 7, 2022

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday May 7, 2022

Let’s take a deep breath over Roe V. Wade

Could we all take a deep breath?

May 13, 2017

A leaked draft decision from the U.S. Supreme Court about abortion has created a bizarre political firestorm here in Canada. The most dangerous place to be these days is between a live microphone and a Canadian politician wanting to tell us how they will fight until their dying breath to protect Canadian women against the insidious evil emanating from south of the border.

Can we bring a little sanity to the situation?

First, the court has not banned abortions. A draft internal document was leaked on a case challenging abortion law which may or may not reflect the court’s final decision. If the leaked decision stands, abortion will lose its constitutional protection and individual state legislatures will be able to regulate or outlaw it. Although a dramatic change, it would not create a nationwide ban

This case has no effect on Canada where there hasn’t been an abortion law since 1988 when the Canadian Supreme Court found the existing law unconstitutional. No successive government was able to come up with a replacement and no major Canadian political party currently supports reopening the issue. Although several Conservative MPs and a second-tier leadership candidate have tried to raise restrictions, it is simply not on the political radar.

Friday May 6, 2022

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday May 6, 2022

The Supreme Court might never recover from overturning Roe v. Wade

October 23, 2020

On Monday, Politico published a draft of a Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 ruling declaring that the Constitution guarantees Americans the right to end their pregnancies. The court later confirmed that the document, written in February, is genuine, but emphasized that it is not the court’s final word. We hope not. If the justices embrace the sweeping document, they will deal a grievous blow to freedom in the United States — and to the legitimacy of the court itself.

Such a leak from the court’s typically tight inner sanctum is itself astonishing. The court works on trust among justices and staff, so that the justices can deliberate frankly. Whether the document leaked from a conservative justice’s chambers, in an effort to lock in the support of others on the right for its far-reaching language, or from a liberal’s, in an effort to mobilize outside pressure against such a ruling, the leak represents a dire breakdown in norms and another dramatic sign of the court’s political drift.