mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Archives
  • DOWNLOADS
  • Kings & Queens
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • Prime Ministers
  • Special Features
  • The Boutique
  • Who?
  • Young Doug Ford
  • Presidents

rants

October 27, 2006

October 27, 2006 by Graeme MacKay

Classify lottery ticket people in convenience stores as a social irritant of mine. Surely, I’m not the only person who seems to be wanting to purchase a newspaper or a pop, only to have someone at the counter hold up everybody’s time because he or she is checking their lottery numbers, and buying tickets for the next one. Yes, it’s a small irritant compared to the atrocities in the world, but one of several issues I like to illustrate on.

Don’t get me started on what I think about lotteries in general

Lotteries are among the other less significant trouble spots I’ve highlighted in the past, such as drinking coffee on boiling hot summer days, icicle lights (here’s another), suburban garage doors, radical vegetarians, Canadian comedians, summer news filler, and lousy neighbours.

While I may come off as irritating complainer, I’m just getting things off my back. My rants about drivers have barely been illustrated, and my wife can attest to how critical I get on every occasion we happen to share a drive some place.

Pet peeves are often occur as fleeting events. You get into everyday situations that aren’t new but are enough to make you pound your head against the wall when they happen… and then you forget about it. A few weeks ago I was reminded about one of the most annoying thing that occurs during economy class flight travel. And it always happens to me. This time I took note… I’m buckled into my seat on a commercial airplane and the moment it becomes ok to recline your seat the person in front of me always, always, finds it’s necessary to recline right to the limit and stay reclined for the duration of the flight. It doesn’t matter that the reclining will cause the crunching sound of the newspaper I was reading and compounded with the tightening grip of my hands on that same newspaper hoping for some kind of retreat by the recliner. Some how I’ll eventually get around to illustrating that particular pet peeve of mine… it’s just a matter of remembering.

Posted in: Canada, Cartooning Tagged: beefs, Coffee, commentary, lottery tickets, rants, vegans

August 31, 2006

August 31, 2006 by Graeme MacKay

In my last blog entry I railed against rubberneck news, or useless news which becomes widely known and discussed among the masses. Here’s my ongoing useless rant against useless things in the world: icicle lights.

For over 5 years I’ve obsessed against those white dangling icicle lights, especially when homeowners decide to keep them up all year round. It’s quite ironic that a device designed to light up and beautify a house for the festive Christmas season at nighttime can actually do the complete opposite during the daytime making a house or window look absolutely hideous. Pretty…

What’s worse is when people think they can get away with decking their house for Christmas and leave the lights up until they actually fall off, or disintegrate. Venture about in any Canadian city and it won’t take long to find a house at the end of August decked out with drooping icicle lights. Go through the real estate pages and you may come across a few houses for sale pictured with the decorations still up as if they make for a nice selling feature.

Through the years I’ve done the following cartoons:

If you’re ever inclined to send a message to a neighbour who thinks celebrating Christmas is a year round thing I’ve given you a licence to make it known to those people that their decorations are ruining your property values:

Posted in: Canada, Lifestyle Tagged: christmas, commentary, icicle lights, rants

August 31, 2006

August 31, 2006 by Graeme MacKay

Garage doors. I hate ’em.

I originally drew this cartoon in April, 1999. The house indicated in Fig. 2 is the ranch style house I lived in while growing up in Dundas, Ont. It had a carport, which my dad couldn’t stand. I was glad to see a critique on garage doors as the lead story in today’s National Post. There’s hope for humanity.


Door closing on ‘dull’ design
Melissa Leong — National Post

Last week, Carl Zehr drove through a new subdivision in Kitchener and saw a wall of garages.

He looked at the rows of semi-detached homes with double-car garages in front, separated by swatches of concrete and small tufts of grass.

“When you looked at these in multiples, side by side if you were looking [down the street], you saw nothing but garage doors,” said Mr. Zehr, Kitchener’s Mayor.

“There has to be a better way.”

On Monday, the city’s municipal council voted unanimously to ban two-car garages in front of semi-detached homes, beginning in 2007. Mr. Zehr said the new zoning bylaw is not simply about ridding communities of what urban planners and architects call “snout houses.”

“It’s about quality of life, eyes on the street and making sure that people could interact in their front yards,” Mr. Zehr said.

Kitchener is the latest example of Canadian municipalities launching attacks on the garage in an effort to create more livable, sustainable communities.

Avi Friedman, an architect, planner and professor at McGill University, said more towns and cities are taking their inspiration from places such as Bois-Franc in Montreal, Garrison Woods in Calgary and Cornell in Markham. They have attractive streetscapes with trees and porches, and few front-facing garages.

“When you build garages, what you get is not only an unpleasing building that looks at times like a car wash, you also create a situation by which a large segment of the sidewalk is paved — not leaving room for trees,” Mr. Friedman said.

“The street is, therefore, very dull. Developing something like this is an anti-social statement.”

Valerie Shuttleworth, director of planning and urban design in Markham said the town was one of the first in Greater Toronto to wage war on the garage.

In the mid-’90s, the town set limits on the size of garages and began developing communities with lanes to access detached garages behind houses.

She said she didn’t get to know her neighbours until she moved to an area without front-facing garages.

Going back to suburban development in the 1920s, garages or sheds were found at the back of the home, planning experts say.

As society increased its reliance on cars, the garage began to creep around to the front of the home.

As more households required multiple vehicles, the garage grew to two, three and four-doors. And as land values rose, people wanted to maximize space by building on top of and around the garage.

“What consumers wanted was the convenience of having a garage attached. They wanted to increase the size of the outdoor space at the back of the house for their enjoyment,” Douglas Stewart, president of the Waterloo Region Home Builders’ Association, said.

“It’s convenient, it’s efficient and it improves the overall urban design,” he said of front-facing garages.

With increasing restrictions on garages, some builders and real estate agents lament the reduction of choice for the consumer.

“If builders are coming forward with houses and designs, it’s because they’ve got a demand out there that they’re trying to meet,” said John Kenward of the Canadian Home Builders’ Association.

“It’s all very well for somebody to stand back and say, ‘Frankly, I don’t like the look of it,’ but … I think the customer has to have a say in this at the end of the day.”

Eastforest Homes Ltd. built 52 semi-detached homes with double garages in a Kitchener subdivision, which was the cause of concern for the city.

But Dave Steinbach, a real estate agent with Peak Realty in Kitchener, said the houses sold “like crazy.”

They cost about $217,000 each. A single detached home with a two-car garage in the same neighbourhood starts at $295,000, he said.

“Today everybody’s a two-car family,” he said. “The city tends to think you use your driveway for a car and the garage for a car. But unless you build a shed in your backyard, where do you put the lawnmower and the kids’ bikes?”

Kitchener tightened garage rules for single-family homes in 2000 (the width of a garage is limited to 70% of the home’s frontage) but did not include semi-detached homes until now.

As municipalities become stricter on what can be built, the building industry has had to modify how it designs homes.

Garages are being pushed back into the house; municipal planning departments need to be consulted on colour schemes for homes.

“They’ve turned the construction market upside down,” Mr. Steinbach said. “All these restrictions add to the final cost of the house.”

Restrictions are the result of municipalities learning to manage the pressures of growth and urbanization or communities being proactive in their planning, design experts say.

“If the Mayor of the community doesn’t think of himself as the chief urban designer of the city then no improvement is possible. It has to be led by the top echelons,” said Toronto-based architect Peter A. Gabor.

“You would be astonished at the range of measures that are controlling development all across the region. Council gets very inventive.”

But planning experts argue that if the goal is to create a better public realm, kicking massive, front-facing garages to the curb is a timid first step.

To reduce the focus on the car, local officials need to develop more compact communities, better public transit and live-work-play areas, Ms. Shuttleworth said. She added that Markham is planning a major employment centre near its Cornell community.

“This issue of the garage is really a symbol or a sign of a much deeper underlying problem,” said Ken Greenberg, a Toronto-based urban designer.

“At the rate Southern Ontario is growing, we have to find new paradigms of handling that…. I think there’s a huge pent-up desire in the public for alternatives to the conventional form of low-density sprawl.”

Posted in: Canada, Lifestyle Tagged: car culture, commentary, Garage, garage doors, housing, rants

Please note…

This website contains satirical commentaries of current events going back several decades. Some readers may not share this sense of humour nor the opinions expressed by the artist. To understand editorial cartoons it is important to understand their effectiveness as a counterweight to power. It is presumed readers approach satire with a broad minded foundation and healthy knowledge of objective facts of the subjects depicted.

  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Toronto Star
  • The Globe & Mail
  • The National Post
  • Graeme on T̶w̶i̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶(̶X̶)̶
  • Graeme on F̶a̶c̶e̶b̶o̶o̶k̶
  • Graeme on T̶h̶r̶e̶a̶d̶s̶
  • Graeme on Instagram
  • Graeme on Substack
  • Graeme on Bluesky
  • Graeme on Pinterest
  • Graeme on YouTube
New and updated for 2025
  • HOME
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • The Boutique
  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Association of Canadian Cartoonists
  • The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists
  • You Might be From Hamilton if…
  • Young Doug Ford
  • MacKay’s Most Viral Cartoon
  • Intellectual Property Thief Donkeys
  • Wes Tyrell
  • Martin Rowson
  • Guy Bado’s Blog
  • National Newswatch
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design

Brand New Designs!

Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Archives

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial