mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Archives
  • DOWNLOADS
  • Kings & Queens
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • Prime Ministers
  • Special Features
  • The Boutique
  • Who?
  • Young Doug Ford
  • Presidents

Republican

Friday November 29, 2024

November 29, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

October 12, 2016

Shotgun Divorce Wednesday October 12, 2016

When I drew a cartoon back in 2016 of Trump as a gun-wielding clown chasing the GOP’s elephant out of his circus tent, I couldn’t have imagined just how spot-on it would turn out to be. Back then, Trump was the outsider shaking up the Republican Party, and the party itself still seemed to have a pulse—full of leaders who at least tried to push back. But now, eight years later, it’s clear Trump wasn’t just running the circus; he was slowly turning it into his personal kingdom.

February 26, 2021

The old GOP—the one that talked about free markets, small government, and national defence—feels like ancient history. People like Mitt Romney, the Bush family, Liz Cheney, and John McCain represented a party with ideals (whether or not you agreed with them). They thought they could outlast Trump, that voters would tire of the chaos. Instead, the opposite happened: the base embraced him, and anyone who didn’t was shown the door. Now, loyalty to Trump isn’t just expected—it’s the whole game.

In Trump’s first term, there was still a mix of insiders, skeptics, and yes-men in his administration. But it didn’t take long for him to figure out who was “with him” and who wasn’t. By the time we reached 2024, Trump wasn’t making the same “mistakes.” His Cabinet picks and key appointments are all about loyalty, not experience. Some of these choices—like putting TV personalities or controversial figures into top positions, Dr Oz, and Pete Hegseth — have even Republicans raising their eyebrows. But guess what? Nobody dares to seriously challenge him. The ones who do, like Liz Cheney or Adam Kinzinger, are now on the outside looking in, while people like Tulsi Gabbard and Stephen Miller are riding high.

February 4, 2021

The GOP has been completely reworked in Trump’s image. It’s no longer about policies or platforms; it’s about fealty. If you’re not 100% behind Trump, you’re out. Even Nikki Haley, who’s tried every dance move possible to stay in Trump’s orbit without completely losing herself, has found herself sidelined again. Trump’s version of the party has no room for skeptics, no patience for dissent. Hello, RFK Jr.

This is the Republican Party now. It runs on loyalty oaths and culture wars. Fiscal conservatism, small government—those are relics. The GOP isn’t about ideas anymore; it’s about Trump and the grievances he taps into. For his supporters, that’s enough. They love the fight, the energy, the fact that Trump’s version of the party feels more connected to working-class anger and less like the old, buttoned-up establishment.

Looking back at that 2016 cartoon, it felt exaggerated at the time—a clown, a gun, the poor GOP elephant running for its life. But honestly, it doesn’t feel exaggerated anymore. The circus has turned into a monarchy, with Trump firmly on the throne. And for now, there’s no one left in the party brave—or foolish—enough to try and take it from him.

Posted in: USA Tagged: circus, clown, Donald Trump, Elephant, GOP, Republican, USA

Saturday August 24, 2024

August 24, 2024 by Graeme MacKay
The recent DNC's interpretation of "freedom" underscores the growing divide in contemporary politics, where notions of individual rights and community welfare clash, revealing how personal definitions of freedom can either empower or restrict others within an increasingly polarized society.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator,  Saturday August 24, 2024

Two Forms of Freedom in a Polarized World

Here’s the Pinterest ink to the animated version of this editorial cartoon.

The 2024 presidential race has transformed into a powerful narrative of poetic justice as Donald Trump potentially faces Kamala Harris, a Black woman, symbolizing a rejection of his divisive legacy and the embrace of a more inclusive future, highlighted by Barack Obama’s lofty critiques and Michelle Obama’s sharper, more pointed attacks.

Thursday August 21, 2024

Following the recent Democratic National Convention in 2024, where the theme of “freedom” was emphasized, we are reminded of the complex nature of freedom in an increasingly polarized world. This concept, while celebrated in various forms, has taken on two distinct meanings that resonate deeply in both the United States and Canada. These emerging interpretations of freedom highlight the tension between individual rights and communal responsibilities, prompting us to reflect on what freedom means in a contemporary context.

Analysis: How Democrats at DNC are seizing on ‘freedom’ theme after years of GOP monopoly

The first interpretation of freedom is rooted in a strong sense of individualism, often promoting a mindset that prioritizes personal autonomy over collective well-being. This perspective is characterized by a notion of “I have the freedom to trample on your freedoms.” We witnessed this during Canada’s “Freedom Convoy,” where protestors framed their resistance to public health measures as a fight for personal liberties. This sentiment echoes the rhetoric of U.S. politicians like Kamala Harris, who often champions individual rights and personal autonomy, particularly concerning reproductive rights and civil liberties. However, this focus on personal freedoms can sometimes overlook the collective implications of those freedoms, particularly in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

In Canada, Pierre Poilievre has similarly tapped into this individualistic narrative, promoting the idea of personal freedoms and economic liberties. His appeal to voters often hinges on a populist message that positions him as a champion of the everyday individual against government overreach. Poilievre’s rhetoric during the Freedom Convoy protests highlighted a disdain for restrictions perceived as infringing on personal rights, reflecting a belief that individual choice should take precedence over collective health measures.

In contrast, the second interpretation of freedom emphasizes the interconnectedness of individual rights and societal responsibilities. This vision posits that true freedom cannot exist in isolation; it must be contextualized within a framework of community welfare. Here, the key question is: “What freedoms threaten the public good?”

This perspective has gained traction in progressive movements across both Canada and the U.S., particularly as we confront issues of systemic inequality and social justice. Advocates for this view argue that some personal freedoms, when exercised without regard for others, can undermine societal cohesion. For instance, the right to free speech, while essential, can become problematic when it is used to propagate hate or discrimination.

Kamala Harris, in her role as Vice President, often emphasizes a holistic approach to freedom, advocating for policies that aim to uplift marginalized communities and ensure equitable access to opportunities. Her stance illustrates a commitment to a vision of freedom that recognizes the importance of social justice and collective well-being.

June 29, 2022

On the Canadian front, Pierre Poilievre has often found himself at odds with this collective perspective, promoting a more libertarian approach that prioritizes economic freedoms. However, as he navigates his leadership within the Conservative Party, he is increasingly challenged to balance individual rights with the realities of social issues such as housing affordability and climate change. The question remains: can a focus on individual economic freedoms coexist with the pressing need for communal solutions?

Opinion: Canada’s conservatives care about freedom—except in health care

Examining these competing visions of freedom necessitates an exploration of the cultural contexts that shape them. In American society, individualism has long been celebrated as a hallmark of personal identity, emphasizing self-reliance and autonomy. This cultural narrative often leads to a belief that individual rights should supersede collective interests. However, this emphasis on personal freedom can sometimes devolve into selfishness, especially when it results in neglecting communal responsibilities and values.

September 13, 2012

In contrast, Canadians typically lean toward a more collectivist philosophy, valuing the good of the community over strict individualism. While this approach is often criticized as overly socialist or even “communist,” it fundamentally seeks to foster a society where individual freedoms are harmonized with the rights of others. Canadians tend to prioritize social safety nets and public services as essential components of freedom, believing that true liberty flourishes within a framework of mutual support and responsibility.

Ultimately, the question of freedom has become deeply personal, shaped by individual experiences, beliefs, and values. Some embrace a form of freedom that champions personal choice and autonomy, while others advocate for a vision that acknowledges the necessity of limitations for the greater good. This divergence reflects a broader societal struggle to balance individual rights with communal obligations, and it highlights the challenges we face in navigating an increasingly polarized world.

As we continue to grapple with these contrasting interpretations of freedom, it is vital to foster a dialogue that recognizes the complexity of these issues. Figures like Kamala Harris and Pierre Poilievre embody the current cultural and political divides, reminding us that our definitions of freedom are not only shaped by individual beliefs but also by the collective needs of our societies. Only through understanding and empathy can we find common ground and work toward a vision of freedom that honours both individual rights and the collective good. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2024-15, animated, Democratic, DNC, DNC2024, Donald Trump, freedom, GOP, Kamala Harris, liberty, Pierre Poilievre, Republican, rights, USA

Wednesday August 7, 2024

August 7, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

The 2024 presidential election presents a decisive choice between the Harris-Walz ticket's progressive vision for an inclusive and forward-thinking America, and the Trump-Vance ticket's return to controversial, divisive policies and rhetoric from a tumultuous past.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday August 7, 2024

A Defining Moment for America’s Future – Harris/Walz vs. Trump/Vance

Kamala Harris's candidacy offers a dynamic and historic alternative to Donald Trump, with the potential to energize the Democratic base and appeal to swing voters despite significant challenges.

July 23, 2024

As the 2024 presidential race takes shape, Americans face a stark and pivotal choice between two vastly different visions for the nation’s future. The Democratic ticket, led by Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, offers a progressive and inclusive roadmap, while the Republican ticket, fronted by Donald Trump and J.D. Vance, represents a return to controversial policies and divisive rhetoric. This election is not just a contest of personalities but a referendum on the direction in which Americans want to steer their country.

Kamala Harris, the first woman and first person of colour to serve as Vice President, brings a wealth of experience and a commitment to progressive values. Her choice of Tim Walz as a running mate underscores a strategic blend of progressive and moderate appeal. Walz, the Governor of Minnesota, has a track record of enacting forward-thinking policies while maintaining a pragmatic approach to governance. He has fortified reproductive rights in Minnesota, ensuring access to abortion and related healthcare services even as these rights are under attack in other states. The Harris-Walz ticket is committed to addressing the climate crisis, with goals such as 100% renewable electricity by 2040 and net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. They advocate for free college tuition for low-income students, free school meals, and paid family leave, aiming to reduce economic disparity and support working families. Walz’s background as a National Guard member and his representation of a conservative district demonstrate his ability to connect with a wide range of voters, including those in rural and traditionally Republican areas.

Opinion: What Tim Walz Brings to Kamala Harris’s Campaign to Beat Donald Trump

J.D. Vance’s extreme and divisive rhetoric, coupled with Trump’s lackluster campaign strategy, has turned their ticket into a significant liability, overshadowed by Kamala Harris's rising appeal and strategic positioning.

August 1, 2024

Donald Trump’s return to the political stage brings with it a litany of controversies and divisive policies that characterized his first term. His choice of J.D. Vance as a running mate signals an attempt to blend populism with conservative traditionalism, but also risks amplifying the polarization that has marked recent American politics. Trump’s involvement in the January 6 Capitol insurrection and his ongoing legal issues, including being a convicted felon, cast a long shadow over his campaign. His handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, marked by misinformation and a lack of decisive action, remains a significant point of contention. Trump’s rollback of numerous environmental protections and his withdrawal from the Paris Agreement highlight a stark contrast with the Democrats’ climate policies. Trump’s history of inflammatory statements against various racial groups, religions, and women continues to alienate a significant portion of the electorate. Vance’s derogatory remarks, such as referring to “childless cat ladies,” and his alignment with Trump’s more extreme views could further polarize voters.

In this defining election, the choice for American voters is clear. The Harris-Walz ticket represents a future-oriented vision that seeks to build on progressive achievements while fostering unity and pragmatic governance. In contrast, the Trump-Vance ticket offers a return to a past marred by controversy, division, and regressive policies. The Democratic ticket’s focus on equity, climate action, and inclusive progress stands in stark opposition to the Republicans’ divisive rhetoric and controversial track record. As America stands at a crossroads, voters must decide whether to continue moving forward with Harris and Walz or to revert to the tumultuous era of Trump. The stakes could not be higher, and the implications for the nation’s future are profound. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2024, 2024-14, Democratic, dystopia, election, future, Gilead, Harris-Walz, highway, party, Republican, Trump-Vance, USA

Thursday January 25, 2024

January 25, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Donald Trump's persistent lead in the polls and the reduction of the GOP field to a lone rival, Nikki Haley, underscores his unassailable influence, depicting a party transformed under his strongman-like sway.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday January 25, 2024

Trump’s Unrelenting Grip: An Inevitable Ascent in the GOP Landscape

The GOP primary unfolds like a prehistoric drama, with Trump dominating as Trumposaurus Rex, and rivals like Haley and DeSantis navigating electability, competency, and the Jan. 6 attack as the circus moves to New Hampshire.

January 17, 2024

In a seemingly predictable turn of events, Donald Trump has maintained a consistent lead in the polls since the early days of the Republican primary, overshadowing a once-crowded field of contenders that included notable figures like his vice president, Mike Pence, Chris Christie, and Ron DeSantis. The emergence of Nikki Haley as his sole remaining rival is more a testament to political pragmatism than a genuine threat, as she lingers, perhaps awaiting unforeseen shifts in Trump’s circumstances.

From the outset, Trump’s dominance in the polls has been unwavering, showcasing a tight grip on the Republican party that extends beyond mere popularity. His commanding presence has reduced a field of over 20 candidates to a lone competitor, Haley, who appears resigned to an inevitable defeat. Her persistence may be rooted in the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s legal challenges or health concerns, rather than a genuine belief in victory.

The Republican landscape, once teeming with diverse voices, now echoes with the singular resonance of Trumpism. Former allies and potential contenders, including Pence, Christie, and DeSantis, have either withdrawn or been eclipsed by the enduring appeal of the ex-president. This consolidation of power is emblematic of a party transformed, where Trump’s influence extends far beyond conventional political norms.

Opinion: Donald Trump’s New Hampshire victory gets him closer to dangerous fantasy of a golden age

The escalating coarseness in Donald Trump's rhetoric, characterized by insulting nicknames and baseless claims, raises concerns about declining civility among his supporters and the potential for authoritarianism, as prominent figures, including Liz Cheney and Joe Biden, warn of the dangers associated with Trump's behavior.

December 9, 2023

Nikki Haley’s continued participation in the race, despite the near-certain outcome, underscores the unique dynamics at play. Her lingering presence hints at a party cautiously hedging its bets, anticipating potential disruptions to Trump’s candidacy, be it through legal challenges or unforeseen health issues.

While the inevitability of Trump’s triumph may dampen the spectacle of the primary, it raises critical questions about the state of the GOP and the enduring sway of its former leader. The polls, consistently favouring Trump, reinforce the narrative of a party firmly in the grip of a singular figure, shaping the trajectory of the upcoming election.

As the Republican primary unfolds with a sense of predictability, the true implications lie not in the absence of competition, but in the enduring dominance of a figure whose influence refuses to wane. The story of Trump’s unrelenting grip on the party may lack the element of surprise, but its consequences for the future of American politics remain deeply significant. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2024-02, China, Democracy, Donald Trump, goose, GOP, Kim Jong Un, North Korea, party, Republican, Russia, USA, Vladimir Putin, voting, Xi Jingping

Wednesday December 13, 2023

December 13, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

As Ukrainian President Zelenskyy urgently seeks continued U.S. support against Putin's invasion, the resistance from Republican lawmakers prioritizing immigration over aiding Ukraine underscores the disheartening politicization and potential neglect of a critical international conflict.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday December 13, 2023

Ukraine’s Struggle for Support: Zelenskyy Caught in Political Crossfire

March 1, 2022

As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faces a critical juncture in his plea for continued U.S. support against Vladimir Putin’s invasion, the battleground has expanded beyond the war-torn Eastern European nation. Zelenskyy’s appeal in Washington, however, has encountered unexpected resistance from Republican lawmakers, whose priorities seem to be swayed more by immigration concerns than the urgent need to aid Ukraine in its fight for freedom.

President Biden’s request for $60 billion in new aid for Ukraine has hit a roadblock, with Republicans blocking a vote and insisting on tying the Ukraine package to border security measures. While House Speaker Mike Johnson claims solidarity with Ukraine against Putin’s invasion, he underscores the need for “clarity” on the U.S. strategy in Ukraine and emphasizes securing the border with Mexico as a top priority.

Zelenskyy’s closed-door meetings with Republican lawmakers reveal a stark reality: the focus seems to be more on hardline immigration measures than on standing in solidarity with Ukraine. The delay in approving Biden’s aid request puts critical assistance funds for weapons transfers and budgetary support in jeopardy, potentially leaving Ukraine vulnerable to Russian attacks.

Vladimir Putin's exploitation of the conflict in the Middle East, particularly his engagement with Hamas, serves as a calculated diversion from his aggressive actions in Ukraine.

November 10, 2023

The contentious link between Ukraine aid and border security measures echoes a disturbing trend in U.S. politics, where domestic issues overshadow the urgency of supporting an ally in a critical international conflict. Zelenskyy’s warnings of losing the war without adequate aid seem to fall on deaf ears as political maneuvering takes precedence.

The situation takes an even more perplexing turn with the involvement of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who, despite being a European leader, is viewed by some as a potential Trojan horse within the European Union. Orban’s resistance to EU funding for Ukraine and his questionable alignment with Moscow’s interests raise concerns about unity within the EU and its ability to support Ukraine.

Zelenskyy’s diplomatic journey faces hurdles not only in the U.S. but also in Brussels, where Orban aims to block Ukraine’s path to EU membership. The Hungarian leader’s various justifications, from alleged mistreatment of ethnic Hungarian minorities to concerns about Ukrainian grains affecting Hungarian farmers, paint a complex picture of political motivations.

November 11, 2022

As Zelenskyy navigates this political minefield, his plea for support becomes not just about Ukraine’s immediate survival but also about the broader implications for international unity and solidarity. The risk of becoming the face of a quickly forgotten war looms large if Zelenskyy cannot secure the necessary funds and commitments from allies.

In the midst of this political drama, the world watches to see if the urgency of Ukraine’s plight can break through the partisan logjam, and if leaders can prioritize the principles of freedom and democracy over internal political agendas. The fate of Ukraine hangs in the balance, and the decisions made in Washington and Brussels will echo far beyond the borders of Eastern Europe. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2023-21, aid, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, military, Republican, Russia, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelenskyy
1 2 … 9 Next »

Please note…

This website contains satirical commentaries of current events going back several decades. Some readers may not share this sense of humour nor the opinions expressed by the artist. To understand editorial cartoons it is important to understand their effectiveness as a counterweight to power. It is presumed readers approach satire with a broad minded foundation and healthy knowledge of objective facts of the subjects depicted.

  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Toronto Star
  • The Globe & Mail
  • The National Post
  • Graeme on T̶w̶i̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶(̶X̶)̶
  • Graeme on F̶a̶c̶e̶b̶o̶o̶k̶
  • Graeme on T̶h̶r̶e̶a̶d̶s̶
  • Graeme on Instagram
  • Graeme on Substack
  • Graeme on Bluesky
  • Graeme on Pinterest
  • Graeme on YouTube
New and updated for 2025
  • HOME
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • The Boutique
  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Association of Canadian Cartoonists
  • The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists
  • You Might be From Hamilton if…
  • Young Doug Ford
  • MacKay’s Most Viral Cartoon
  • Intellectual Property Thief Donkeys
  • Wes Tyrell
  • Martin Rowson
  • Guy Bado’s Blog
  • National Newswatch
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design

Brand New Designs!

Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Archives

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial
 

Loading Comments...