Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday May 17, 2025
Victoria Day Vindication
January 13, 2025
As Canadians ready themselves for the long-awaited May two-four weekend, a celebration traditionally filled with barbecues, beer, and the unofficial launch of summer, this year’s observance takes on a deeper resonance. Victoria Day, a holiday that honours the long-deceased Queen Victoria, has evolved over time to become a moment of reflection on our nation’s heritage, rather than merely a nod to our constitutional monarchy.
However, in 2025, amidst a backdrop of strained relations with our southern neighbour, the United States, this holiday carries heightened significance. The recent tensions, sparked by U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canadian imports and his dismissive rhetoric about Canada as the “51st state,” underscore a growing need for Canada to affirm its sovereignty and unique identity.
President Trump’s affinity for monarchy and grand ceremonies, recently illustrated during his tour of Saudi Arabia and Qatar, where he was enveloped in luxurious tributes and golden welcomes, contrasts sharply with Canada’s steadfast commitment to its own democratic principles and global partnerships. His anticipated state visit to the United Kingdom, featuring dinner with King Charles III, further emphasizes his penchant for spectacle over substance.
In this climate, the upcoming Speech from the Throne, presided over by Canada’s new Prime Minister, Mark Carney, and featuring the King’s speech, serves as a powerful reminder of our rich history and sovereign status. It is a moment that not only honours our past but also projects our commitment to an independent future on the global stage.
Prime Minister Carney’s recent meeting with President Trump in the Oval Office, where he firmly stated that “Canada is not for sale,” encapsulates the spirit of resilience and dignity that defines our nation. As we mark Victoria Day, we do so with the understanding that our ties to the monarchy are part of a broader tapestry of national identity, one that embraces diversity, democracy, and international cooperation.
The rhetoric of reducing Canada to a mere extension of the United States must come to an end. Our nation, with its rich history as an old confederation and a proud member of the global community, stands firm in its values and principles. This Victoria Day, as Canadians gather to celebrate with family and friends, let us also take a moment to reflect on the significance of our sovereignty, the strength of our alliances, and the enduring legacy of our constitutional traditions.
In recognizing these truths, we honour not only our past but also our present and future as a nation that commands respect and partnership, not as a subordinate, but as an equal on the world stage.
Poilievre’s New Game Plan: Charting a Course in Carney’s Canada
March 14, 2025
As Canada’s political scene shifts, Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party face new hurdles with Mark Carney stepping in as the Liberal leader. Poilievre’s strategy has long focused on opposing Justin Trudeau, leveraging criticism and combative rhetoric. However, with Trudeau stepping down and Carney taking charge, this approach may no longer resonate as effectively.
Mark Carney brings a fresh perspective and a solid reputation from his financial career. His leadership style, perceived as calm and competent, stands in contrast to Poilievre’s aggressive tactics. Recent polls show Carney is viewed more favourably in several leadership areas, which could spell trouble for Poilievre, who has thrived on opposing a now-absent Trudeau.
Furthermore, Poilievre’s alignment with rhetoric similar to Donald Trump’s, using phrases like “woke” and “globalist,” may alienate voters who are looking for unity rather than division. This is especially critical as Canada faces external pressures from Trump’s policies, such as trade tariffs. Poilievre’s core supporters, often likened to “Maple MAGA,” may appreciate this stance, but it risks isolating those seeking a more inclusive approach.
Herein lies Poilievre’s internal conflict: the dilemma of whether to cut ties with the “Maple MAGA” ideology that has both anchored and propelled his political journey. This weight, adorned with the familiar yet burdensome motifs of nationalism, presents a significant decision point. To sever this connection might mean broadening his appeal to a wider electorate, yet maintaining it could secure the steadfast loyalty of his current base.
With Carney offering a hopeful vision, Poilievre needs to adjust his strategy. Attacking Carney might appear desperate if Canadians view Carney as a beacon of positive change. The Conservatives must shift from merely opposing to proposing real solutions that address Canada’s needs.
In this new political era, Poilievre has the chance to broaden his appeal by focusing on unity and constructive policies. Success will depend on adaptability and addressing the issues that matter most to Canadians, shaping the country’s future leadership and direction. Whether Poilievre decides to embrace change or cling to the familiar weight of “Maple MAGA” will be a testament to his vision for Canada’s future.
In the world of Canadian politics, my editorial cartoons aim to capture the multifaceted challenges faced by our leaders. Yesterday’s cartoon highlighted the main challenge for Prime Minister Mark Carney: the baggage he inherits from Justin Trudeau. Bringing hand-me-down ministers into his cabinet offers convenient fodder for the Conservative narrative that his leadership is merely an extension of the “Sunny Ways” Liberal government of yesteryear. While some appreciated this portrayal, others took umbrage—one commenter even calling me a “3rd rate cartoonist.”
For those who are blinded by partisanship they probably shouldn’t pay attention to editorial cartoons. Our designs in editorial cartoons is to draw out the uncomfortable hard truths even to those afflicted by an incurable case of political stalwarts.
For the critics, today’s cartoon might offer a fresh perspective. This time, I depict Pierre Poilievre shackled to “Maple MAGA,” a term that encapsulates the base of supporters who echo the alt-right and far-right rhetoric. Despite my attempts, I couldn’t fit “Timbit Trump” into the illustration, though credit is due to Karina Gould for coining it. This is the first time I’ve used “Maple MAGA” in a cartoon, and it aptly describes Poilievre’s supporters who parrot narratives from American MAGA influencers like Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson.
Their rhetoric often drops terms like WEF, Soros, and Globalist, peppered with phrases like “Justine Trudope” or “Justinflation,” adding a distinctly Canadian twist—hence, “Maple MAGA.” Both Poilievre and his base are experiencing a bit of an identity crisis. The notion of “Canada First” seems unlikely to resonate against a backdrop of global interdependence, especially when compared to the isolationist “America First.”
Poilievre’s contemplation of cutting foreign aid reflects this struggle, as he remains unable to unshackle himself from the support of his crucial base. Whether these depictions resonate or provoke, my hope is to spark meaningful dialogue about the paths these figures are carving out for Canada’s future.
Please enjoy the making-of my Saturday March 15, 2025 editorial cartoon:
Trump’s Dangerous Dance with Authoritarianism: Rewriting Reality
October 26, 2024
In a world increasingly fraught with geopolitical tensions and the stark realities of authoritarian aggression, the responsibility of democratic nations to uphold truth and justice has never been more critical. As former President Donald Trump seeks to rewrite history by casting Ukraine as a villain and its leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, as a dictator, it is imperative that the global community stands united against this dangerous narrative.
The facts are clear and undisputed: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was an unprovoked act of aggression, a blatant breach of international law, and a humanitarian disaster that has claimed countless innocent lives. Ukraine, under the steadfast leadership of Zelenskyy, has fought valiantly to defend its sovereignty and democratic principles against an authoritarian regime bent on its destruction.
December 10, 2024
Trump’s recent comments not only distort these truths but also align disturbingly with the playbook of authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin, a man widely recognized as a war criminal due to his regime’s actions in Ukraine. By shifting blame onto the victim of this brutal conflict, Trump undermines the very principles of justice and democracy that the United States and its allies have long championed.
As highlighted in a New York Times piece by Peter Baker, Trump’s revisionism involves “a striking distortion of reality,” where he falsely accuses Ukraine of initiating the conflict and portrays Zelenskyy as a “dictator without elections.” Such rhetoric not only misleads but also endangers the fragile alliances and support systems that have been built to uphold international law and order.
This revisionist rhetoric poses a grave threat to the established world order, one that has, despite its imperfections, largely sought to promote peace, stability, and human rights. By sowing doubt and division, Trump risks weakening the unity of Western nations and emboldening authoritarian regimes that see opportunity in discord.
It is incumbent upon the leaders of democratic nations, including those in Europe, Canada, the UK, and beyond, to resist this dangerous narrative. Silence in the face of such blatant misinformation and revisionism is not an option. To remain silent is to tacitly endorse a worldview that values power over principle, lies over truth, and tyranny over freedom.
February 13, 2024
As one courageous GOP congressman pointed out, Vladimir Putin’s actions warrant the label of war criminal, a fact that cannot be ignored or softened by political expediency. It is a moral and ethical imperative for politicians, regardless of party affiliation, to speak out against any attempt to rehabilitate or justify his regime’s actions.
History will judge those who, in a time of moral crisis, chose the path of least resistance. It will remember those who stood by and allowed truth to be eclipsed by falsehoods for political gain. But it will also honour those who had the courage to speak out, to defend the values of democracy and human rights, and to stand with the oppressed against their oppressors.
In this pivotal moment, the global community must reaffirm its commitment to these principles. We must reject revisionism, support the victims of aggression, and hold accountable those who seek to distort reality for their own ends. Only by doing so can we hope to preserve the fragile peace and order that so many have fought and died to protect.
Today, I poured my creativity into crafting a cartoon that tackles a situation fraught with serious implications. The focus was on former President Donald Trump’s recent statements about Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, amidst the ongoing conflict with Russia. Despite the cartoon’s lighthearted approach, the underlying issues are deeply concerning.
It’s telling that a lot of people say everything Trump says is a lie, reflecting a widespread skepticism and mistrust. This perception adds a layer of complexity, especially as Trump leads efforts to broker peace in a critical conflict with questionable intentions. Many still believe him, which only deepens the divide between those who seek truth and those who follow his narrative.
While the cartoon aims to entertain, it also highlights the troubling reality of misleading rhetoric. It underscores my worry about the direction of global politics and the urgent need for leaders who prioritize truth and genuine peace efforts.
Please check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 21, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I release my post every Saturday morning summarizing the week through my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading here is a “note,” designed to help craft my weekly posts and display the animated versions of my daily cartoons. Enjoy!
As Canada navigates a politically charged landscape, the winds of change seem to be blowing in favour of Mark Carney, whose candidacy is rapidly gaining traction against Pierre Poilievre. Recent polling data reflects a growing momentum for Carney, a seasoned economist with extensive experience in both Canadian and international finance. This shift signals a potential realignment of Canadian political dynamics, with voters increasingly drawn to Carney’s steady and pragmatic approach.
Poilievre, long seen as the frontrunner with his Trump-inspired rhetoric and combative style, now finds himself in a precarious position. His past pandering to Trump’s supporters, characterized by divisive slogans and rhetoric, is increasingly at odds with the prevailing mood among Canadians. As Trump issues threats about tariffs and annexation, Canadians are unifying against such rhetoric, seeking leadership that stands for national sovereignty and constructive international relations.
Moreover, Poilievre’s relentless use of rhetoric that once resonated with voters is now faltering. His attacks on Justin Trudeau lose their bite as Trudeau steps off the political stage. The slogan “Axe the Tax,” aimed at the Liberal federal consumer carbon tax/rebate scheme, is becoming outdated as all leadership hopefuls and leaders, including Carney, plan to end it. Additionally, the narrative that “Canada Seems Broken” inadvertently aligns with Trump’s suggestion that Canada might as well become the 51st state, a notion that undermines national confidence and unity.
Poilievre’s recent attempts to soften his tone and adopt a more inclusive message appear to be a strategic response to Carney’s rising popularity. However, this shift in rhetoric may come across as disingenuous to voters who have witnessed his previous alignment with Trumpian ideals. The challenge for Poilievre lies in convincing Canadians that his change in approach is more than superficial sloganeering.
In contrast, Carney’s candidacy offers a compelling alternative. With his background as a former governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, Carney brings a wealth of experience and a reputation for sound economic management. His pragmatic, solutions-oriented demeanour resonates with Canadians seeking stability and hope amid economic uncertainties and geopolitical tensions.
Carney’s ability to engage with complex issues, such as navigating relations with the United States, positions him as a credible leader in the eyes of voters. His approach, characterized by thoughtful discourse and a commitment to national interests, stands in stark contrast to the polarizing tactics often associated with Poilievre.
As the political narrative unfolds, it becomes evident that Canadians are looking for leadership that rises above partisanship and populism. The momentum building for Carney suggests a collective desire for a leader who embodies integrity, competence, and a vision for a prosperous future.
In this critical moment, the choice before Canadians is clear: a decision between the divisive rhetoric of the past and a new path forward, led by a leader who can unite and inspire. As the polls indicate, Mark Carney is emerging as the candidate who can offer that hope and direction, setting the stage for a transformative chapter in Canadian politics.
Mark Carney’s Rise Should Be Bringing Pierre Poilievre To Tears
Those who know my work understand that I have a bit of a love-hate relationship with politicians gaining too much popularity. For over a year now, Pierre Poilievre has been the big man on campus in Ottawa, seemingly miles ahead of other leaders. But let’s face it—his rise to fame might have more to do with Justin Trudeau’s declining popularity. Ever since Trudeau got that strong majority in 2015, his approval ratings have been on a slow, steady decline.
Poilievre seized on Trudeau’s weaknesses, turning his failing leadership into a bit of a personal punching bag with his sharp, often biting style since taking over the Conservative helm in 2022. But now, the tables are turning. Enter Mark Carney—a real contender with a unique set of credentials. Poilievre made a name for himself critiquing Trudeau’s shaky economic policies, playing up his role as a “fake economist.” Now he faces a real economist with the kind of pedigree that reads like a dream—Harvard, Oxford, former Governor of the Bank of Canada, and the Bank of England. Meanwhile, Poilievre holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Calgary.
Sure, education is just one piece of the puzzle, but life experience matters too. Poilievre has been a career politician, while Carney has been setting key interest rates and serving on bank and law firm boards. The old Conservative line of “He’s just not ready” won’t work this time around.
We’re on the brink of a major showdown between these two, and I have to say, it’s going to be quite the spectacle. As for me, I’m rooting for one of them for now, knowing that whoever wins will soon find themselves at the sharp end of my satire. But when it comes to Trump, he is, and will always be, my ultimate target—regardless of who holds the title of Prime Minister.
As Canada’s political dynamics evolve, Mark Carney’s candidacy is swiftly gaining traction against Pierre Poilievre, whose reliance on Trump-like rhetoric is losing resonance. Carney’s experience and pragmatic solutions appeal to Canadians seeking stability amid economic uncertainties and geopolitical tensions. Poilievre’s slogans, once powerful, now seem outdated, especially as rhetoric against Trudeau becomes irrelevant and narratives like “Canada Seems Broken” inadvertently align with Trump’s annexation suggestions. Carney’s rise reflects a shift towards leadership that embodies integrity, competence, and a hopeful vision, positioning him as a compelling alternative for a transformative future in Canadian politics.
Please check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 20, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I release my post every Saturday morning summarizing the week through my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading here is a “note,” designed to help craft my weekly posts and display the animated versions of my daily cartoons. Enjoy!
As Canada stands on the brink of a significant political transition, Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party, finds himself at a pivotal moment. The resignation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, the ensuing Liberal leadership race, and the impending return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency have created a complex landscape that demands nuanced navigation. Poilievre’s approach, characterized by populist rhetoric and a focus on critiquing Liberal policies, must evolve to address the multifaceted challenges that lie ahead.
February 13, 2017
Poilievre’s political strategy has largely revolved around painting a picture of a “broken” Canada under Trudeau’s leadership. His catchy slogans, such as “Axe the Tax,” resonate with voters frustrated by economic and environmental policies they perceive as burdensome. However, as the political dynamics shift with Trudeau’s departure, Poilievre’s reliance on populist rhetoric may prove insufficient. The challenge now is to pivot from slogans to substantive policy discussions that address the real concerns of Canadians.
The return of Donald Trump to the Oval Office presents a unique challenge for Canada-U.S. relations. Trump’s provocative statements about Canada becoming the 51st state, though implausible, underscore the power imbalance between the two nations. Poilievre’s shared populist tendencies with Trump may not translate into better relations. As Debra Thompson points out, Trump’s focus is not on ideology but on loyalty, rendering him largely unmanageable by either Canadian leader.
Trudeau’s resignation has opened the door for a new Liberal leader—potentially Chrystia Freeland or Mark Carney—who could appeal to centrist voters and challenge Poilievre’s populist appeal. As Konrad Yakabuski highlights, Poilievre’s strategy, centered on attacking Trudeau, must now adapt to confront a potentially revitalized Liberal Party. This shift presents an opportunity for Poilievre to engage in a battle of ideas rather than relying solely on criticism and slogans.
December 3, 2024
In this era of political and economic uncertainty, the key challenge for any Canadian leader is to protect the nation’s interests without succumbing to external pressures. Poilievre’s task is to navigate a political culture that values stability, compromise, and sovereignty. As Canada faces potential volatility from American policies, Poilievre must prioritize safeguarding Canada’s hard-won independence and focus on domestic strengths.
Public opinion on Poilievre is divided. Some view him as a necessary change from the Trudeau era, while others criticize his populist tactics and lack of substantive policy proposals. Concerns about his qualifications and experience echo in reader comments, alongside skepticism about his ability to lead Canada through complex international relations.
Pierre Poilievre stands at a critical juncture in Canadian politics. As the nation prepares for an election that could redefine its leadership, Poilievre’s ability to adapt his strategy and engage in meaningful policy debates will be crucial. The path forward requires balancing populist appeal with pragmatic solutions that address the diverse needs of Canadians. In navigating these challenges, Poilievre has the opportunity to redefine his leadership and shape Canada’s future in a rapidly changing world.
It’s hard to ignore the impact Pierre Poilievre’s slogan “Axe the Tax” has had on his rise in the polls. For months now, this mantra has resonated with Canadians feeling the squeeze from rising interest rates, inflation, and grocery prices. It’s a powerful message that taps into the frustrations of many, convincing them that the government’s carbon pricing scheme is the root cause of their struggles. However, the real question is: what comes next?
Poilievre has yet to outline any concrete plans once he “axes the tax.” His stance on climate change is particularly concerning; he seems to downplay the crisis and lacks a comprehensive climate policy. In a recent press conference, he dismissed potential leadership rivals as “just another Justin Trudeau,” but when it comes to climate issues, he resembles Stephen Harper more than he might care to admit.
With the political landscape shifting—especially with Justin Trudeau’s resignation and Donald Trump’s looming presidency—Poilievre finds himself at a crucial juncture. He must evolve his approach beyond populist rhetoric and engage in meaningful policy discussions. With new Liberal figures like Chrystia Freeland and Mark Carney ready to appeal to centrist voters, the challenge for Poilievre will be to protect Canadian interests while navigating external pressures, particularly from the U.S.
As we watch this unfold, it’s essential for all of us to stay informed and engaged. The future of Canadian politics may hinge on how leaders like Poilievre adapt to these complex challenges.
Enjoy the January 10, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday or Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons.
