Balancing Provinces and Prioritizing Canada: A Call for Unity
December 18, 2024
In the complex landscape of international trade and economic diplomacy, Canada’s provincial leaders are faced with the challenge of balancing regional interests with national priorities. The recent discussions around potential tariffs from the incoming U.S. administration have underscored the necessity for a unified Canadian front. However, Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith’s divergent stance has sparked a debate that goes beyond provincial borders, touching on the very essence of Canadian unity and national strategy.
Alberta’s economic landscape is undeniably tied to its oil industry, a sector that has been a cornerstone of the province’s prosperity and a significant contributor to the national economy. The oil sands have not only fuelled Alberta’s growth but have also been a lifeline for Canada, providing jobs, energy security, and substantial revenues. For Premier Smith, prioritizing Alberta’s interests is not only a political necessity but also a reflection of her commitment to her constituents who depend on this vital industry.
Yet, as Ontario’s Premier Doug Ford aptly put it, “Our country comes first.” In times of external threats, such as the looming tariffs that could destabilize the Canadian economy, unity becomes paramount. The strength of a nation lies in its ability to stand together, to prioritize collective well-being over regional gains. This is where the balance must be struck—between advocating for provincial interests and aligning with a national strategy that safeguards all Canadians.
Smith’s decision to distance herself from the consensus reached by her fellow premiers raises questions about the broader implications of her stance. While her focus on Alberta’s oil industry is understandable, her approach risks isolating the province at a time when cohesion is crucial. By not joining the collective effort, Alberta may inadvertently weaken its negotiating power, as well as that of the entire country.
Doug Ford’s leadership in rallying the premiers reflects a commitment to presenting a united front, essential in negotiations with a complex and unpredictable U.S. administration. His message is clear: while every province has its unique needs and priorities, these should not overshadow the importance of national unity. A fragmented approach only serves to undermine Canada’s position on the global stage and risks playing into the hands of those who might benefit from division.
In this context, it is imperative for Premier Smith to reconsider her strategy. By aligning more closely with her fellow premiers, she can advocate effectively for Alberta while contributing to a stronger, more cohesive national strategy. This does not mean abandoning Alberta’s interests but rather integrating them into a broader Canadian framework that seeks to protect the entire nation’s economic future.
The path forward requires collaboration, dialogue, and a willingness to put Canada’s collective interests at the forefront. As the country navigates these uncertain times, all provinces, led by their premiers, must work together to ensure that Canada’s voice is unified and its position strengthened. Only then can we effectively safeguard our economy, our sovereignty, and our future in a rapidly changing global landscape.
The Premiers meeting this week was a real eye-opener, showing just how tricky it can be to balance provincial and federal interests. And right in the thick of it is Alberta’s Premier, Danielle Smith, who’s found herself in a bit of an awkward spot. Why, you ask? Well, aside from her odd chumminess with Donald Trump—seriously, a weekend jaunt to Mar-a-Lago and plans to attend his inauguration?—she’s been steering Alberta in a direction that’s causing some raised eyebrows.
Smith’s focus on protecting Alberta’s oil industry makes sense given its importance to the province’s economy. But here’s the rub: oil is a hot-button issue, especially as we push towards green energy. Meanwhile, Canada’s trying to juggle putting a price on carbon while still propping up the fossil fuel industry. It’s a bit of a head-scratcher, really—oil revenues are crucial not just for Alberta, but for the federal government too, providing jobs and fuelling budgets.
Then there’s Trump’s looming 25% tariffs, which could seriously mess with the Canadian economy. Right now, it’s all about playing the waiting game to see if these tariffs will hit us across the board, or if, fingers crossed, oil might get a pass given the U.S.’s reliance on it.
Now, here’s where it gets even more tangled. Ontario’s Premier, Doug Ford, is rallying for a united front against these tariffs, saying we should protect our own turf but always put Canada first. It’s a solid point, given that oil is our ace in the hole—a big bargaining chip in the face of Trump’s wild tariff plans. But Smith’s solo approach could undermine this strategy.
The way I see it, Alberta needs to think about joining forces with the other provinces. A united stance gives us a stronger hand to play on the world stage, ensuring we protect both provincial and national interests. By weaving Alberta’s oil concerns into a broader Canadian strategy, we can amplify our voice globally and maybe, just maybe, take some wind out of Trump’s tariff sails.
So, what’s next? It’s a delicate dance, this one. But one thing’s for sure: how Alberta chooses to move forward could tip the balance for all of Canada. Let’s hope they choose wisely. Things can get very ugly, indeed.
I tossed a question out to my social media followers, asking for their take on Ontario Premier Doug Ford’s advice to Alberta Premier Danielle Smith regarding the Trump tariffs: “…protect your jurisdiction but country comes first, Canada’s the priority.” The overwhelming sentiment leaned in favour of Ford, yet the responses shed light on a deeper divide. Many pointed out that Alberta has often found itself at odds with the rest of Canada, citing examples like stalled pipeline expansions and the Keystone XL debacle. Some argue Smith was elected to defend Alberta’s interests, especially when those interests seem sidelined by national strategies. Others highlighted Alberta’s role as a major contributor to federal transfer payments, questioning why it should shoulder the burden without due consideration. A sentiment echoed was Alberta feeling like the 51st state, as its interests are perceived to be overridden by Ontario’s convenience. Meanwhile, some viewed Ford’s comment as perhaps his smartest yet, though motives were questioned—is it genuine, or just a strategic move for votes? The debate underscores the complex dynamics of provincial versus national priorities in Canada, and how this tension plays into the broader tariff negotiations.
Enjoy the January 17, 2025 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday or Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons.
Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday February 7, 2023
Justin Trudeau’s Liberals are stuck in the mud and hoping a health care deal helps pull them out
December 21, 2016
Justin Trudeau told us he was roaring into 2023 to “meet the moment” but lately his Liberals have been regrouping, retreating and running around in circles.
In a speech to his caucus prior to the resumption of Parliament, he said the Liberals would put forward a “positive vision for the future,” including good jobs, safe communities with clean air, and “an economy that works for everyone.”
At the top of the list was a fix for health care, which he promised would mean not only more federal money but better health care outcomes. Mr. Trudeau had just announced that he was convening a meeting with premiers for Feb. 7, a sign that a federal-provincial deal on health care is close. That was supposed to be the first big item on the Liberal agenda in 2023.
So this week Mr. Trudeau has an opportunity to take back the initiative.
A prime minister’s meeting with premiers never goes by without disagreement, but it is a place where the PM’s voice carries the loudest. And if the meetings do end with a level of federal-provincial agreement, sealed by a major, multiyear injection of federal cash, then Mr. Trudeau will tout progress on an issue at the top of Canadians’ concerns.
November 24, 2015
At this point, the Liberals are getting a little desperate for that kind of agenda-setting. Anything where the news is something the Liberals are doing, rather than something they are undoing, or something they wish they could do over. So this is a big week for Mr. Trudeau.
His Liberals would like to carry a health care deal into a spring of initiatives and a budget that is expected to centre on clean-tech incentives and industrial strategy.
But that’s just a hope right now. Mr. Trudeau’s government has had setbacks and scandals and made blunders before, but the Liberals have eventually regained the ability to set the political agenda with a flurry of activity. That is one of the home-field advantages of being in power: Government actions have consequences, so their agenda is consequential. Yet lately, Mr. Trudeau’s team seems less able to control it.
Mr. Trudeau’s government is encountering problems of a third-term government that has been through a lot.
One is that things come undone or are shown to have been done badly. (Continued: Globe & Mail)
Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday September 8, 2021
Canada’s Trudeau struggles, two weeks before election
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau – who has slipped in the polls and faced angry protesters on the campaign trail, with one even throwing stones at him – is struggling with less than two weeks to go before snap elections. When he called the September 20 elections a few weeks ago, the 49-year-old Liberal Party leader was in a far better position.
September 1, 2021
At that point, Trudeau was ahead of Conservative leader Erin O’Toole in opinion surveys and hoped to ride his handling of the coronavirus pandemic to a third term. But since that August 15 announcement, his campaign has stagnated and his hopes of returning at the head of a majority government seem difficult to fulfil. On Monday, Trudeau suffered a fresh indignity – as he was leaving an event in London, a city southwest of Toronto in Ontario province, he faced a crowd of protesters angry over proposed mandatory coronavirus vaccines and other crisis measures.
Someone threw what appeared to be a handful of gravel at him, television footage showed. No one was injured.
“Yes, I felt some of that gravel,” Trudeau confirmed yesterday.
July 9, 2021
Some protesters “were practically foaming at the mouth, they were so mad at me,” he said, adding: “It is absolutely unacceptable that people (would) be throwing things and endangering others at a political rally.” The incident – which comes during a crucial campaign week with two scheduled debates that could tip the election scales – drew condemnation from Trudeau’s rivals, O’Toole and New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh.
“Political violence is never justified,” O’Toole tweeted late Monday, while Singh said: “It is not acceptable to throw objects at anyone. Ever. No matter how angry you are. And, it’s never ok to try to intimidate people who don’t agree with you – or the media.” Trudeau is now in a statistical dead heat with O’Toole, with 34% support for the Liberals and 32% for the Tories, according to a Nanos survey released Tuesday – a difference that is within the poll’s margin of error.
The prime minister has faced off on several recent occasions with what he described as “anti-vaxxer mobs” and “a small fringe element in this country that is angry, that doesn’t believe in science.”
Protesters have shouted racial and misogynist slurs at his entourage. Demonstrations also targeted hospitals across Canada that are struggling with a sudden spike in Covid cases, and candidate lawn signs have been defaced with anti-Semitic graffiti.
In late August, Trudeau was forced to cancel an event over security concerns.
So far, Trudeau has pledged not to allow so-called “fringe” groups “to dictate how this country gets through this pandemic.”
August 17, 2021
And Felix Mathieu, a politics professor at the University of Winnipeg, said the angry protests and Trudeau’s pushback might actually benefit the Liberals, who stumbled in the early days of the campaign. Although O’Toole has promoted the use of vaccines, “his party remains widely associated with those who vehemently oppose vaccines and Covid containment measures,” Mathieu told AFP.
That allows Trudeau to present himself as a defender of public safety, especially as he steps up criticisms of the Tories’ rejection of mandatory vaccines, Mathieu explained.
More than 83 percent of those Canadians eligible to get a coronavirus vaccine (12 years or older) have received one dose and 76% are fully vaccinated, according to government data.
October 16, 2019
The Liberal plank proposes mandatory jabs for public servants and travellers on trains, planes and buses. It also earmarks C$1bn (US$800mn) to stitch together a patchwork of provincial vaccine passports.
Pollster and former political strategist Tim Powers said the violent protests are “concerning.” “The pandemic has intensified people’s manner of anger and the way they express anger,” Powers told AFP. “There are a lot of people who are very frayed and beaten down by the pandemic, and campaign events provide an opportunity for some people to showcase their discontent,” he said, adding a warning: “Who knows what can happen in these sorts of circumstances.”
But Powers said he agrees that the protests are “providing the Liberals with a useful political prop,” allowing Trudeau to be seen fighting against anti-vaccine groups who might threaten a quick post-pandemic return to normalcy – just as Canadians are heading back to classes and offices. (Gulf Times)
Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday December 13, 2019
Conservatives face an awkward question: What if Scheer wasn’t the problem?
On the simplest level, Andrew Scheer was merely a political leader who failed — a politician who made too many mistakes and suffered self-inflicted wounds that cut too deep.
Andrew Scheer Gallery
The larger legacy of his time as Conservative leader may end up being that of a politician who saw the times pass him by — yesterday’s man, his ideas and positions out of step with a significant majority of voters.
But that depends on where his party and Canadian politics go next.
Scheer’s sudden (but not entirely surprising) exit on Thursday was quickly accompanied by reports that the Conservative Party had somehow been covering part of the cost of his children’s education at a private school. That might not seem like a problem in and of itself, at least not a significant one.
But Scheer had just spent an election campaign pitching himself as a middle-class everyman, a stark contrast to an affluent and privileged Liberal leader — a prime minister Scheer and other Conservatives had ridiculed for using the budget of his official residence to hire nannies.
The matter of financial assistance also fits a pattern.
Late in this fall’s campaign, Scheer had to admit that he was a dual citizen of Canada and the United States — despite having previously questioned the dual citizenship of former governor general Michaëlle Jean.
That revelation came shortly after Scheer was compelled to admit that he had not been licensed as an insurance broker, despite having claimed to have worked as a broker before entering politics (he also had only worked in an insurance office for six or seven months).
While all of this was going on, the Conservatives were still loudly insisting that Justin Trudeau was “not as advertised.”
Scheer’s struggles were not limited to contradictions. He wouldn’t — or couldn’t — account for his previously stated views on same-sex marriage. He never found a way to explain why he wouldn’t march in a Pride parade. And during the first televised leaders’ debate, he was noticeably reluctant to acknowledge to that he was personally opposed to abortion.
Scheer’s campaign became a personal identity crisis. And then he failed to defeat a vulnerable opponent. (Continued: CBC)
Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday December 13, 2017
Liberals’ byelection wins signal problems for Andrew Scheer
Monday’s Conservative loss of South Surrey-White Rock, in a by-election there, combined with the lacklustre NDP scores points to a pattern. The B.C. riding had not elected a Liberal since 1972. And while Trudeau did recruit a popular candidate, the Conservative tasked with holding the riding — Kerri-Lynne Findlay — was a former Harper minister.
Andrew Scheer Gallery
Buoyed by two upset byelections victories over the Conservatives this fall and with a solid shot at winning back Outremont from the NDP if and when Thomas Mulcair retires in the New Year, few in the Liberal backrooms will lose sleep over the fact that overall, the Conservatives increased their vote share in three of four ridings on Monday.
Scheer cannot win the next general election in the face of a Liberal juggernaut in Quebec and B.C. And he won’t have much of a shot at toppling Trudeau unless the NDP reverses its decline.
The two parties to the left of the CPC are communicating vessels. A lost vote for the New Democrats is almost always a vote gained for the Liberals. It usually takes a split in the non-conservative vote for the Conservatives to win government.
Throughout the fall — Trudeau’s most difficult political season to date — the New Democrats and the Conservatives have been telling themselves that buyer’s remorse was about to catch up to the Liberals.
It seems both opposition parties had been inhaling their own question period fumes.
In the end the only seeds of buyer’s remorse that may have been planted in the mid-mandate byelections would pertain to the opposition’s leadership choices. (Source: Toronto Star)
