sovereignty – mackaycartoons

Wednesday April 30, 2025

April 30, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 30, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

Canada’s Stand: Mark Carney vs. Trump’s Shadow

April 25, 2025

The recent Canadian federal election has unfolded against a backdrop of unprecedented political dynamics, driven largely by the influence of U.S. President Donald Trump. His aggressive rhetoric, including threats to annex Canada as the 51st state and the imposition of tariffs, became central issues that galvanized Canadian voters. In response, Canadians have made a decisive choice by electing Mark Carney’s Liberal Party to lead the nation, even if through a minority government.

This election result is not merely a rejection of Trump’s influence but also a testament to Canada’s resilience and commitment to its sovereignty. As the Guardian noted, “Trump’s chaotic threats won Mark Carney the Canadian election,” emphasizing how the external pressure from Trump galvanized voters around a leader who promised to stand firm.

Analysis: Trump’s chaotic threats won Mark Carney the Canadian election – but only just

April 12, 2025

Mark Carney, a former central banker, has stepped into the political arena with a wealth of experience in navigating global economic challenges. His leadership during this tumultuous period offers Canadians a sense of stability and competence. In his acceptance speech, Carney struck a combative tone, emphasizing that “President Trump is trying to break us so he can own us. That will never happen.” This clear stance resonates with Canadians’ desire to protect their national interests against external threats.

While the Liberals’ victory was not a sweeping mandate, it reflects a strategic choice by voters to support a leader who promises to defend Canada’s sovereignty. The New York Times highlighted that Carney’s campaign centred around resisting Trump’s menacing comments and tariffs, a message that clearly resonated with the electorate.

However, the minority government situation presents its own set of challenges. Carney will need to navigate a complex political landscape, relying on support from smaller parties to advance his legislative agenda. Yet, Carney’s track record as a central banker, accustomed to dealing with crises, positions him well to manage these challenges effectively.

NYT: Mark Carney’s Liberals Win Canada’s Election. Here Are 4 Takeaways

April 2, 2025

Voters’ rejection of Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party, which saw its fortunes wane as Trump’s influence grew, further underscores the Canadian electorate’s desire to distance itself from MAGA-style politics. The swift shift in political dynamics reflects a broader sentiment that Canada must define its path on its own terms, independent of external pressures.

As one reader commented, “We elected someone who is an adult and a true leader. And I am relieved and so grateful.” This sentiment captures the optimism many Canadians feel as they look to the future under Carney’s leadership. His plans to diversify Canada’s alliances and reduce reliance on U.S. trade further demonstrate a proactive approach to strengthening the nation’s position on the global stage.

In conclusion, while the path forward will require careful navigation of domestic and international challenges, Canada is well-positioned to face the threats posed by a Trump-led America. Under Mark Carney’s experienced and steady leadership, there is much for Canadians to feel optimistic about as they work towards a future defined by resilience, unity, and self-determination.

Saturday April 26, 2025

April 26, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 26, 2025 (Published in the Toronto Star)

Canada’s Historic Moment Amidst Trump’s Global Disruptions

April 2, 2025

In the annals of modern history, few leaders have managed to cast as wide and as contentious a shadow as Donald Trump. His second term as President of the United States has proven to be an era of unprecedented upheaval, marked by a series of aggressive and unpredictable maneuvers that have sent shockwaves through global political and economic systems. As Canada stands on the brink of a pivotal federal election, Trump’s influence looms large, creating a historic moment that could redefine the nation’s role on the world stage.

From the outset, Trump’s presidency has been a whirlwind of controversy and disruption. His recent threats to annex Canada and impose punitive tariffs have not only strained bilateral relations but have also thrust Canadian politics into the international spotlight. Mark Carney, the Liberal leader and a former central banker, finds himself in a unique position. His expertise and calm demeanour in the face of Trump’s provocations have resonated with voters seeking stability in uncertain times. Inadvertently, Trump has become a significant factor in Canada’s electoral calculus, making this election one of the most consequential in recent memory.

The Guardian: Canada election is Carney’s to lose in contest turned on its head by Trump

March 21, 2025

The impact of Trump’s policies is not confined to North America. Across the globe, allies and partners are reassessing their relationships with the United States. The European Union, once a steadfast ally, now contemplates a future where it must forge stronger ties internally and with other global powers to counterbalance an unpredictable U.S. administration. Trump’s disregard for established international norms and his penchant for unilateral actions have left many nations grappling with the reality of a world order in flux.

For Canada, this moment presents both challenges and opportunities. Trump’s actions have underscored the vulnerabilities inherent in over-reliance on a single ally, prompting a reevaluation of Canada’s foreign policy and trade strategies. The positive international reception of Carney’s leadership during this crisis highlights Canada’s potential to lead in building multilateral relationships that transcend traditional alliances. This is Canada’s moment to assert itself as a resilient and adaptable nation, capable of navigating the complexities of a rapidly changing global landscape.

Opinion: Donald Trump can’t stop trash talking Canada. That may be the reminder we need

March 5, 2025

Yet, the path forward is fraught with uncertainty. Trump’s polarizing presence is both exhausting and dangerous, not only for the United States and Canada but for the world at large. His willingness to upend decades of diplomatic progress in favour of short-term gains and headline-grabbing antics threatens the stability of international systems built on cooperation and mutual respect. As nations scramble to adjust, the spectre of a fragmented global order looms large, with unpredictable consequences for economic and geopolitical stability.

In these historic times, Canada’s election serves as a microcosm of the broader global struggle to adapt to a new era of leadership defined by disruption and unpredictability. As Canadians head to the polls, they do so with the knowledge that their choice will resonate far beyond their borders, shaping not only their nation’s future but also its place within the international community.

Analysis: As the World Recoils, Canada Votes in the Shadow of a Rogue President

February 4, 2025

In the face of such challenges, it is imperative that Canada—and indeed the world—remains steadfast in its commitment to the principles of diplomacy, cooperation, and resilience. Only by embracing these values can we hope to navigate the turbulent waters of the present and chart a course toward a more stable and inclusive future.

Not Going Away

So, here’s the scoop: We’ve got this new guy in the neighbourhood, and let’s just say he’s quite the boor and buffoon. But unlike your typical troublesome neighbour, this guy isn’t just a headache for the folks nearby—oh no, he’s a well-known nuisance to everyone up and down the street, and even to the people across the block.

The kicker is the crew he’s got living under the same roof with him. You’ve got J.D. Vance, Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio, Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr., Howard Lutnick, Kash Patel—the list keeps going. And then there are the friends who just can’t stay away, like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lindsey Graham, and Ted Cruz, all adding to the chaos. It’s like a never-ending parade of drama and misery that these new folks are bringing to everyone around them.

Picture this: We used to have civilized people in that house. Now, it’s filled with nasty folks who can’t seem to get along with anyone, always tossing around insults. There’s no kindness, just this glaring sense of entitlement.

And then there’s Donald Trump, who loves to repeat his mantra—“We don’t need Canada” or “Canada would make a fine 51st state.” Seriously, it’s like he wants Canada but also claims the USA doesn’t need it. Who in their right mind thinks this is a way to win friends? It’s maddening, insulting, and downright bullying.

This is the backdrop as Canadian voters head to the polls next week. Why Trump gets a kick out of this is anyone’s guess, but it’s definitely something for the voters to think about as they cast their ballots.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 26, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

YouTube: The 2025 Federal Election Elephant https://youtu.be/tyRFNYSpHPc

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday April 25, 2025

April 25, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 25, 2025 (Published in the Toronto Star, April 27, 2025)

The Trump Factor in Canada’s Federal Election

April 23, 2025

As Canada’s federal election draws to a close, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has become an unexpected yet dominant figure in shaping the political discourse. His comments on tariffs, trade agreements, and even the audacious suggestion of Canada as the 51st state have stirred the waters, presenting Canadian voters with three pivotal questions: “Carney or Poilievre: Who’s more Trumpy?”; “Carney or Poilievre: Who’s best for Dealing With Trump?”; and “Carney or Poilievre: Who does Trump Prefer?”

Who’s More Trumpy? In terms of policies and demeanour, Pierre Poilievre undeniably channels more of Trump’s attributes. His rhetoric, which echoes Trump’s nationalist populism, includes slogans that promote a “Canada First” agenda. Poilievre’s approach to reducing government influence, skepticism of international organizations, and a confrontational style resonates with Trump’s signature tactics. On the other hand, Mark Carney embodies a more traditional and balanced leadership approach, prioritizing multilateral cooperation and economic stability. Carney’s focus on diplomacy and evidence-based decision-making starkly contrasts with the more brash techniques associated with Trump.

News: Trump talked about the ’51st state’ during call with Carney: Radio-Canada sources

April 22, 2025

Who’s Best for Dealing With Trump? Despite Poilievre’s ideological similarities with Trump, this doesn’t necessarily make him the best candidate to handle Trump on the international stage. There’s a legitimate concern that Poilievre’s alignment might lead to submission during negotiations, reminiscent of some Republican figures in the U.S. Conversely, Mark Carney, with his extensive background in economics and crisis management, is well-equipped to engage with Trump from a position of informed authority. Trump’s acknowledgment of Carney’s economic expertise likely prompts him to take Carney more seriously than a leader whose policies merely mirror his own.

Who Does Trump Prefer? While it might seem that Trump would naturally favour a leader like Poilievre due to shared ideologies, the reality is more complex. Trump’s respect for Carney’s expertise and strategic acumen is evident. Known for his transactional approach, Trump likely sees value in Carney’s ability to address complex economic issues, understanding that a competent counterpart in Canada could lead to more productive engagements rather than simple ideological alignment.

News: Trump reinserts himself into Canadian politics, saying ‘as a state, it works great’

April 17, 2025

The assumption that Trump would prefer Poilievre simply due to ideological kinship oversimplifies Trump’s pragmatic nature. Trump recognizes Carney’s capabilities and respects his economic insights, understanding that effective leadership involves not just agreement but the capacity for meaningful engagement. As Canadians cast their votes, these considerations emphasize the importance of selecting a leader who can effectively stand up to Trump’s pressures while also facilitating constructive discussions in U.S.-Canada relations. In this election, Carney’s combination of diplomatic skill and economic expertise may offer Canada the most effective path forward in addressing the challenges posed by the Trump era.

Reflection Time

I’ve only got two more editorial cartoons to draw before voting day, and this one featuring Pierre Poilievre consulting the magic mirror counts as one of them! It seems fitting, especially since no U.S. President in living memory has influenced our election so much as Donald Trump has. His comments and antics are really shaping how we view our leaders, especially when it comes to Poilievre and Mark Carney.

As I’m sketching this out, it’s hard not to see how Poilievre channels Trump’s vibe with his “Canada First” attitude and confrontational style. But then there’s Carney, who offers a more diplomatic and balanced approach. It really raises the question: who’s actually better suited to deal with Trump on the global stage?

While Poilievre might seem like a natural fit for Trump due to their shared ideologies, I think Carney’s economic expertise could give him an edge in negotiations. Trump might actually respect Carney’s skills more than just having someone who echoes his populist rhetoric.

It’s fascinating (and a bit concerning) to watch history unfold right before our eyes. So, as we get closer to the polls, let’s think about who can really stand up to Trump’s pressures and foster productive discussions for Canada.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 25, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

You Tube: Pre-Election Day Reflection https://youtu.be/_9UWr9hliC4

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday April 23, 2025

April 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 23, 2025

Canada’s Quiet Resolve in Strengthening Defence Amid Global Uncertainty

March 1, 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of global politics, where alliances are tested and national interests recalibrated, Canada finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Recent events and political shifts have underscored a growing realization among NATO member countries, including Canada, that bolstering military capabilities is not just a response to external pressures, but a strategic necessity for a world where traditional security assurances can no longer be taken for granted.

The backdrop to this realization is a United States led by President Donald Trump, whose rhetoric and actions have raised concerns about America’s commitment to global security frameworks established post-World War II. Trump’s calls for NATO allies to increase defence spending to five percent of GDP, though seemingly about shared burden, mask a deeper unease about the U.S.’s role as a reliable security partner. Trump’s annexation rhetoric concerning Canada and Greenland, while alarming, reflects an unpredictable approach to international relations that has left many allies wary.

News: Trump wants NATO to spend 5% on defence. What do Canada party leaders say?

January 12, 2022

Canada, traditionally seen as a steadfast partner within NATO, has faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s defence spending target of two percent of GDP. Yet, there’s a nuanced understanding emerging among Canadian political leaders. Both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre have now committed to reaching the two percent target by 2030, aligning their strategies to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security in an increasingly unstable world. This alignment signifies a shared recognition of the importance of enhancing military capabilities amidst global uncertainties.

This decision reflects a pragmatic approach to defence policy. Canada recognizes that in a world where the U.S. might retreat from its role as a global security guarantor, it must step up to ensure its own defence readiness. The focus is on modernizing the military, securing the Arctic, and investing in cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing, all while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

News: Mark Carney unveils a plan to Trump-proof Canada

July 12, 2018

Canada’s resolve to meet NATO commitments “on its own terms” is emblematic of a broader trend among NATO members. Many countries are recalibrating their defence policies not just due to external pressures from the U.S., but because of the realization that global threats are multifaceted. The unpredictability of a U.S. administration dismissive of trade and military alliances only adds to the urgency.

In this context, Canada’s approach is both sensible and strategic. It is about strengthening defence capabilities while fostering unity and consensus among political leaders. The decision to bolster military spending is not about succumbing to external demands but about safeguarding national interests in a changing global order.

As Canada moves forward, the focus should remain on maintaining a balanced approach that prioritizes security, economic stability, and diplomatic engagement. By doing so, Canada can navigate the complexities of international relations with resilience and resolve, ensuring its place as a respected and reliable partner on the world stage.

PPs 2% Promise

I’ve been closely following Pierre Poilievre’s approach to Canada’s NATO obligations, and his recent commitment to the 2% GDP defence target by 2030 has caught my attention. Until last week’s debate, Poilievre hadn’t specified a timeline, often critiquing the Liberals’ fluctuating target dates between 2028 and 2034 over the past couple of years without presenting his own. Now, it turns out his target aligns precisely with the Liberals’ plan, even as countries worldwide are exceeding the 2% benchmark.

Interestingly, Poilievre’s decision to announce this commitment late in the campaign suggests strategic timing. It’s likely not a stance that would be met with overwhelming enthusiasm, especially within his own party, where it could be quite polarizing. Let’s face it, bolstering defence—even amid increased threats—isn’t high on the average voter’s priority list, particularly with the cost of living crisis intensifying as Trump ramps up tariffs.

This revelation suggests that Poilievre might not be as hawkish as many believed. His mealy mouthed attitude toward supporting Ukraine’s struggle against Putin tyranny is a chief indicator of this for another day. While he shares Trump’s scepticism towards international agreements and multilateralism, evidenced by his rare mention of the Paris Accord, his reticence on NATO commitments raises questions. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the need to strengthen Canada’s military, including against potential U.S. threats.

Historically, Canada’s Conservative Party has championed robust military and defence policies. Yet, in the era of Donald Trump, who demands a 5% GDP commitment to NATO, one might expect Canadian conservatives to follow suit. Instead, Poilievre’s proposal mirrors the Liberals’, aiming for 2030, which I find both intriguing and somewhat lacking.

While I often see parallels between Canadian conservatives and Trump’s Republicans, this divergence is significant. The traditional hawks within Canada’s Conservative Party appear to have less influence, a point worth noting. When it comes to defence, the differences between Canada’s two major parties offered to voters are strikingly similar.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 23, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

PPs 2% Promise https://youtu.be/7QXYW_dp024

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Saturday March 29, 2025

March 29, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday March 29, 2025 (also, The Toronto Star)

Featured in The Daily Cartoonist

Arctic Ambitions: A New Era of American Expansionism

March 1, 2025

In an era where the world’s geopolitical landscape is ever-evolving, the spectre of American expansionism has reemerged in a form reminiscent of a bygone age. The recent developments surrounding the U.S. interest in Greenland, fuelled by President Donald Trump’s ambitions, have brought to light a narrative that harks back to the days of imperialism and territorial conquest.

The notion of annexing Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark, seems almost anachronistic in today’s global order. Yet, it is a reality unfolding before our eyes, driven by strategic interests in the Arctic’s abundant resources and its pivotal location. This new chapter of American expansionism challenges not only international norms but also the trust and alliances that the United States has cultivated over decades.

News: JD Vance, his wife to tour U.S. military base in Greenland after diplomatic spat over uninvited visit

March 6, 2025

The diplomatic debacle surrounding Vice President J.D. Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance’s visit to Greenland highlights the broader implications of this expansionist agenda. The strong local opposition, reflected in protests and refusals to engage with the U.S. delegation, underscores the importance of respecting sovereignty and the voices of local populations. The trip, initially intended as a cultural and diplomatic engagement, was reduced to a brief visit to a military base, symbolizing the isolation and unwelcomeness of American overtures.

The strategic interests in Greenland—its oil, gas, and mineral wealth—make it a coveted prize for any nation. However, the pursuit of such gains under the guise of national security risks alienating America’s allies and eroding the trust built over generations. The parallels to the Monroe Doctrine and Teddy Roosevelt’s gunboat diplomacy are stark, yet this iteration lacks the subtlety of “walking softly.” Instead, it wields a “big stick” that could isolate the U.S. on the world stage.

Opinion: Putin nods to Trump plans to seize Greenland

August 1, 2024

In a twist reminiscent of James Gillray’s famous cartoon “Plumb Pudding in Danger,” Russian President Vladimir Putin’s reaction to Trump’s Greenland ambitions is notably accepting, as if part of a predetermined exchange. It evokes a scenario where territorial aspirations are casually traded, with whispers of “you can have Ukraine if I can have Greenland.” As these geopolitical machinations unfold, one can’t help but imagine a sequel: “and if all goes well, Vlad, I’ll let you take Europe if I can have Canada.” These are the crazy times in which we live, where world leaders appear to carve up the globe with alarming nonchalance.

Opinion: So many souvenirs for JD Vance to take home from Greenland: oil, gas, minerals – and that’s just the start

As nations strategize against this new reality, the U.S. risks becoming friendless and isolated, cashing in the trust it once held as an honest broker. The actions of one man, Donald Trump, threaten to redefine America’s image and its relationships, casting long shadows over its diplomatic legacy.

In this unfolding drama, Greenland stands not just as a potential trophy of expansion but as a symbol of the mistrust and uncertainty facing a world grappling with the resurgence of imperial ambitions. The challenge for the U.S. is to navigate these waters with respect for international norms, lest it finds itself adrift in a sea of its own making.

Add VANCE to Greenland

Today, Usha Vance, along with J.D. Vance, visited Greenland. What was supposed to be a diplomatic and warm visit turned into just a stop at a U.S. Army base. Unfortunately, Usha still had to go on this altered trip.

This happened against the backdrop of a phone call between Mark Carney and Donald Trump. It was their first call, and while such calls usually happen quickly to extend congratulations, Trump didn’t follow the norm. Surprisingly, the call was cordial and uneventful, which is notable given the current tense climate.

In contrast, previous calls with Trudeau ended in heated exchanges, with Trump later making rude comments about Canada. However, today’s call had none of that drama. Despite this, Trump is unpredictable and could still make disrespectful remarks elsewhere.

In the call, it was confirmed that tariffs are coming on April 2, labeled “liberation day,” but thankfully, there was no mention of annexing Canada. However, for Greenland, we stand with its people and Denmark against Trump’s aggressive stance.

The visit to Greenland highlights the unpredictable nature of Trump’s diplomacy and the challenges that come with it.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 29, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack