sustainability – mackaycartoons

Friday June 20, 2025

June 20, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 20, 2025

Balancing Boom and Respect: Ontario’s Ring of Fire Dilemma

June 6, 2025

The development of Ontario’s Ring of Fire region presents a critical opportunity for sustainable economic growth, not only for the province but for Canada as a whole. Rich in crucial minerals like nickel and gold, this area has the potential to significantly bolster our economy, particularly in the face of external pressures such as those posed by a hostile administration in the White House. However, realizing this potential requires balancing development with respect for Indigenous rights and environmental sustainability.

At the centre of this debate is Bill 5, the “Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act,” which aims to expedite the approval process for large infrastructure projects, including those in the Ring of Fire. While the bill is designed to reduce project approval times from 15 years to just two, it has been met with significant opposition. Critics argue that it undermines treaty rights and environmental protections by creating “special economic zones” that prioritize rapid development over due process.

News: Doug Ford accuses First Nations of ‘coming hat in hand’ for government money, despite treating them ‘like gold’

May 29 2025

Premier Doug Ford’s recent comments about Indigenous communities coming “hat in hand” for government support have added fuel to the fire. While his intent may have been to highlight opportunities for self-sufficiency and economic partnership, the language used was perceived as insensitive and disrespectful. Such remarks risk evoking historical stereotypes that overlook the systemic challenges faced by Indigenous communities and can undermine the trust needed for meaningful collaboration.

There is a general consensus among many stakeholders that advancing sustainable development in the Ring of Fire is essential. However, this must be pursued with a commitment to thorough and genuine consultation with Indigenous communities. Their voices and rights are pivotal in any development plans, as they have a direct stake in the land and its resources.

Opposition to development is inevitable, and there will always be dissenting voices. These positions should be respectfully considered and addressed, ensuring that the government truly represents the will of the majority while honouring its commitments to Indigenous peoples. This is not just a matter of legal obligation but a moral one, integral to the fabric of our national identity and values.

News: Doug Ford accused of ‘racist’ comments ahead of meeting with First Nations chiefs

April 23, 2006

The broader societal debate reflects a tension between economic aspirations and the need to uphold environmental and Indigenous rights. It is crucial for political leaders, like Premier Ford, to navigate these discussions with sensitivity and respect. The language used in political discourse can either bridge divides or deepen them, and it is the responsibility of our leaders to foster unity and understanding.

As we contemplate the development of the Ring of Fire under Bill 5, let us strive for a future where economic growth does not come at the expense of our principles or the well-being of Indigenous communities. It is possible to achieve a balance that respects both the land and its people, ensuring that the benefits of development are shared equitably and sustainably. This requires thoughtful leadership, open dialogue, and a commitment to reconciliation—a path that acknowledges our past and looks forward to a prosperous and inclusive future.

Premier Doug’s Inappropriate Dance

The Ring of Fire region in Ontario presents a significant opportunity for economic growth due to its rich mineral deposits. Bill 5 aims to speed up development, but it has ignited controversy over potential impacts on Indigenous rights and the environment. Premier Doug Ford’s comments about Indigenous communities seeking “handouts” have been criticized, highlighting the need for respectful dialogue. While many see development as essential, it must be pursued with careful consideration of Indigenous perspectives and environmental protections. By fostering open communication, Ontario can find a path that benefits all stakeholders and respects the land’s heritage.

Ontario’s Ring of Fire holds immense economic potential with its rich mineral resources. Bill 5 aims to fast-track development, but it’s sparked debate over Indigenous rights and environmental concerns.

Doug Ford’s comments about Indigenous communities seeking “handouts” have been criticized as lacking sensitivity. While the goal is self-sufficiency, it’s crucial to engage in respectful and meaningful dialogue with Indigenous groups who have a deep connection to the land.

He wisely took the unexpected step of apologizing alongside Indigenous leaders in a press conference after the meeting. Unfortunately for Dougie, his mea culpa came too late for my deadline.

Most agree that development is important, but it must be done thoughtfully. We need to balance economic growth with respecting Indigenous rights and environmental protections. By fostering open and honest communication, we can find a path forward that benefits everyone and honours our commitments to Indigenous communities.

If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for June 20, 2025, below!

YouTube: https://youtu.be/Dg_EiVeT_9s

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday June 6, 2025

June 6, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 6, 2025

Also printed in the Toronto Star. Published on Reddit.

Doug Ford’s Bill 17 – Yet Another Step Backwards for Ontario’s Future

May 29 2025

Doug Ford is at it again, pushing through Bill 17, the “Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act,” with the same disregard for environmental protections that characterized his earlier attempts to dismantle the Greenbelt. Ford seems unfazed by previous voter backlash, perhaps feeling invincible with a third majority government—never mind that it was supported by less than half of the voting populace. It seems apathy has its price, and in this case, it’s a mediocre government that prioritizes quick wins over genuine progress.

Bill 17 epitomizes Ford’s governance style: quick fixes, shortcuts, and a focus on appeasing developers and well-connected allies at the expense of everyday Ontarians. By overriding local green building standards, this bill undermines cities like Toronto and Hamilton, which have been proactive in setting their own climate benchmarks. This disregard for local needs could lead to higher emissions and weaker climate defences in new developments.

Analysis: Ford government moves to override cities on green building standards

November 13, 2020

Adding insult to injury, Bill 5 complements this approach by cutting Indigenous communities out of the consultation process. Ford’s administration seems to have little interest in meaningful engagement, opting instead for expediency over respecting Indigenous rights and fostering true reconciliation.

This isn’t Ford’s first run-in with environmental neglect. His track record includes cancelling the Green Energy Act and the cap-and-trade program, decisions that not only forfeited potential revenue but also missed opportunities for sustainable job creation. Ford’s approach mirrors a wider trend where governments, both in Canada and the U.S., are rolling back environmental protections. Ottawa’s recent rollback of the carbon tax/rebate program is yet another example of this troubling regression.

October 31, 2023

In Ontario, Ford’s frequent use of Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) to fast-track development without public debate only further underscores his disdain for democratic processes. This tactic creates a shadowy parallel bureaucracy that lacks transparency and accountability.

The path Ford has chosen is one that turns back the clock on conservation and trivializes the impacts of climate change. It disenfranchises communities striving for sustainable growth. As Ontarians, we must demand better from our leaders. We deserve a government that values comprehensive reforms, respects environmental protections, and champions a sustainable future. Doug Ford’s Bill 17 and Bill 5 are steps in the wrong direction, and it’s crucial for the people of Ontario to demand more thoughtful and planet-focused policies.

Ford’s Familiar Tune

Here I am again, feeling like a broken record, lamenting yet another one of Doug Ford’s government’s anti-environmental moves. It seems like this is what we signed up for when less than half of the voting public handed him a third majority government. Sure, Ford played the Captain Canada role brilliantly, taking a strong stand against Trump earlier this year, and his dramatic flair continues to win him applause. But beneath that performative exterior, we’re stuck with the reality of what the next few years are likely to look like.

Ironically, Ford’s approach mirrors a “Trumpy” disregard for genuine consultation and environmental responsibility. It’s full steam ahead for his developer pals and provincial power brokers, with little concern for the impact on our planet. It’s almost amusing—almost—how he can be hailed as a brave critic of the U.S. President while simultaneously mirroring that same President’s approach when it comes to ignoring the climate crisis. It’s a frustrating echo, and one that I fear we’ll be hearing more of in the years to come.

Posted to Substack: Superhero of Developers. Please subscribe. It’s free!

Saturday May 31 2025

May 31, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday May 31 2025

Prairie Flames: A Tale of Two Leaders

June 21, 2024

As wildfires blaze across Saskatchewan and Manitoba, we’re witnessing a stark contrast in how leaders are handling the crisis. The fires are starting earlier, burning hotter, and lasting longer, a sign of changing times tied to climate change. This situation highlights the different paths being taken by the premiers of these two provinces.

BBC: Western Canada wildfires emergency hits another province as thousands flee

June 8, 2023

In Saskatchewan, Premier Scott Moe is well-known for his support of the oil and gas industry. He argues that these industries are vital for the province’s economy. However, his focus on fossil fuels seems outdated when faced with the reality of more intense wildfires. Moe has resisted federal climate policies like carbon pricing, which some see as ignoring the root causes of these worsening fires.

On the other hand, Manitoba’s Premier Wab Kinew is taking a different approach. He has set ambitious goals to reduce emissions and shift towards renewable energy. Kinew’s response to the wildfire crisis includes taking swift action to protect communities, showing a clear understanding of the link between climate change and these natural disasters.

News: Saskatchewan declares state of emergency as wildfires force evacuations in western and central Canada

July 21, 2022

Kinew acknowledges the challenges of moving away from fossil fuels, but his willingness to address these issues head-on reflects a commitment to both the environment and the economy. His leadership suggests a balance between immediate action and long-term planning.

The fires ravaging these provinces remind us of the importance of leadership in the face of climate change. The choices made today will shape the future, and the contrasting approaches of Moe and Kinew offer insight into how different strategies can impact the fight against climate-related disasters. As the fires burn, the need for thoughtful and proactive leadership becomes ever more critical.

Giant Wildfires on the Prairie by The Graeme Gallery

Friday May 30, 2025

Read on Substack

Thursday May 29 2025

May 29, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 29 2025

Published also in The Toronto Star, and on Reddit.

Ford’s Fast Track: Mining Progress or Consultation Overlook?

October 22, 2022

Back in 2019, Premier Doug Ford’s government tried to push through Bill 66, which threatened the Greenbelt and ignored environmental protections. Public outrage forced them to backtrack. Fast forward to 2025, and it seems the government hasn’t learned its lesson with Bill 5.

Bill 5 aims to speed up mining in the Ring of Fire region by creating “special economic zones.” This move is supposed to boost the economy, but it has angered Indigenous leaders and the public. Critics argue it’s like a repeat of Bill 66, ignoring the need for proper consultation with those affected.

News: Doug Ford government amends controversial mining bill to allay First Nation concerns

January 24, 2025

To Ford’s credit, he has skillfully tackled the challenges posed by the Trump administration’s trade actions, which threatens Ontario’s manufacturing base. By focusing on developing the mining of critical minerals, he has aligned with voter support for economic resilience and growth. However, what’s lost in this expectation granted by citizens is the crucial need for proper consultation with Indigenous communities.

Despite offering amendments to allow Indigenous-led economic zones, the government’s promise to consult with First Nations after the fact seems insincere. Indigenous communities should be involved from the start, not as an afterthought.

News: Doug Ford offers amendment to First Nations on mining bill but vows to speed development through ‘economic zones’

December 11, 2018

Reader comments highlight the need for genuine engagement and respect for Indigenous rights. The government’s approach of rushing development without proper input feels like a misstep, echoing past mistakes.

Consultation isn’t just a formality; it’s essential for fair and democratic decision-making. By not learning from the past, the Ford government risks repeating history with Bill 5. It’s time for a more inclusive approach that values the input of all Ontarians and respects the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Only then can we ensure a future that’s fair and sustainable for everyone.

A Test for Doug – Editorial Cartoon for Thursday May 29, 2025

Posted to Substack

After all these years since Canada kicked off its reconciliation efforts with Indigenous Peoples, you’d think we’d have the basics down by now. One of the most fundamental practices is meaningful consultation, especially when it comes to economic development that impacts our environment—whether it’s the sea, air, or land. And when it comes to something like mining, this should be a no-brainer.

December 11, 2018 – Environmentalists and critics accused Premier Doug Ford of breaking his promise to protect the Greenbelt, claiming that the changes introduced in Bill 66 undermined environmental protections and opened the area to development.

Yet, here comes Doug Ford, ready to defy common sense and try to limit consultation once again. This isn’t the first time he’s taken this approach, and it seems like another case of lessons not learned. It’s as if he’s trying to sneak this by, testing the waters to see how far he can push things.

Considering that less than half of Ontario’s voters bothered to cast a ballot, it might seem like Ford reads the 55% who didn’t vote as a kind of silent approval. But relying on voter apathy or disengagement is risky business. Silence doesn’t equal consent, especially when it comes to respecting the rights and voices of Indigenous communities.

Tuesday November 28, 2023 – The Ontario Liberal Party is set to announce its new leader, facing the challenge of overcoming voter apathy and past election setbacks to compete against Doug Ford in future elections.

In today’s animated editorial cartoon, which Substack subscribers get to preview before it hits the Hamilton Spectator, I’m being upfront about a new technique I’ve started using: AI for adding voice to the characters.

According to YouTube’s policy, it’s essential to disclose when content is altered or synthetic, especially if it seems real. This includes realistic sounds or visuals created with AI. With today’s technology, the line between real and fake is increasingly blurred, and AI-generated voices are impressively accurate.

One of my critiques of animated satire has always been the voiceovers for political figures. While some might be as skilled as David Levine at caricaturing, they often fall short of Rich Little when it comes to voice impressions. Now, with AI, replicating political voices is not only easy but also a bit unsettling.

In the animated clip below, I’ve used software to mimic the voice of Doug Ford. I believe it’s clear that it’s not really him, but for those who might be too convinced, there’s a disclaimer in place.

This is uncharted territory, and I’d love to hear your thoughts. If you have any feedback or want to start a conversation, now’s your chance.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. Please Enjoy the animated making of my May 29, 2025 editorial cartoon below and thank you for your continued support!

Wednesday May 21 2025

May 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday May 21 2025

Ford and Trump: Economic Growth at Environment’s Cost

November 16, 2024

In a striking political maneuver, Doug Ford secured a third term as Ontario’s Premier by channeling public outrage against Donald Trump and his tariff policies. This strategy, while effective at the polls, has obscured a more profound and troubling similarity between Ford and Trump: a shared devotion to economic development that disregards environmental sustainability and, arguably, the very reality of climate change.

NYT Opinion: The U.S. Under Trump: Alone in Its Climate Denial

October 31, 2023

Ford’s recent legislative actions and budgetary decisions echo the deregulatory zeal that characterized Trump’s presidency. Both leaders have prioritized immediate economic growth, often through support for traditional energy sectors and infrastructure projects, over long-term environmental stewardship.

Bill 5, a legislative proposal under Ford’s government, seeks to create “special economic zones” that bypass established environmental regulations and Indigenous consultation processes. This move mirrors Trump’s efforts to roll back federal environmental protections in favour of accelerating industrial projects. Critics argue that such policies represent a short-sighted approach, undermining ecological safeguards and social equity in pursuit of rapid economic gains.

July 11, 2018

Environmentalists and Indigenous leaders have voiced strong opposition, warning that Bill 5 could lead to the destruction of habitats and erosion of constitutionally protected rights. The Toronto Star’s coverage highlights the potential for this legislation to concentrate power within the provincial cabinet, enabling decisions that may favour private interests over public good—a hallmark of the Trump administration’s approach to governance.

The Narwhal’s analysis of Ontario’s budget reveals further parallels. Despite recent extreme weather events, Ford’s government has opted to cut funding for emergency preparedness and forest firefighting. Instead, the focus remains on building highways and expanding mining in the Ring of Fire, areas rich in critical minerals but fraught with ecological and social concerns.

The Narwal: Ontario budget weighs tariff threats, ignores climate threat

December 1, 2018

This emphasis on infrastructure expansion at the expense of environmental considerations is reminiscent of Trump’s prioritization of fossil fuel projects and infrastructure over climate action. Both leaders seem to view environmental regulations as obstacles to economic progress rather than essential safeguards for future generations.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent dismissal of climate change as a pressing issue. Ford’s policies, much like Trump’s, lack a comprehensive strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or address the root causes of climate change. The reliance on fossil fuels has increased under both administrations, reversing progress made in previous years and contributing to higher emissions.

Ford’s budget cuts to environmental programs and resistance to sustainable transport solutions, such as bike lanes and public transit expansion, further underscore a disconnect between economic policies and environmental realities. This approach risks leaving Ontario—and indeed the world—ill-prepared for the escalating impacts of climate change.

The Toronto Star: Ford government denies bill to speed up development will override environmental and Indigenous concerns

November 12, 2024

The Greenbelt controversy, which plagued Ford’s government, serves as a glaring example of the administration’s failure to learn from its mistakes. Despite public outcry and legal challenges over attempts to develop protected lands, the government continues to pursue similar policies that prioritize development over conservation. This pattern of behavior suggests a persistent disregard for environmental sustainability and public trust.

While Ford’s political strategy of leveraging external threats like Trump’s tariffs may win elections, it cannot mask the fundamental need for a balanced approach to development. Economic prosperity and environmental sustainability are not mutually exclusive; they must be pursued in tandem to ensure a viable future.

Substack: Donald Trump: Dirtiest U.S. President Ever

June 2, 2017

Both Ford and Trump have demonstrated a penchant for policies that prioritize short-term economic gains over long-term ecological health. As voters and citizens, it is crucial to demand leadership that recognizes and addresses the intertwined challenges of economic development and environmental stewardship. Only then can we hope to achieve a sustainable and equitable future for all.

Denial’s Golden Voyage: Sailing Past Reality in 2025 by The Graeme Gallery

Wednesday May 21, 2025

Read on Substack