toddler – mackaycartoons

Tuesday February 4, 2025

February 4, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday February 4, 2025

Confronting the New Era of Canada-U.S. Trade Tensions

February 2, 2025

In a perplexing turn of events, President Trump’s administration has ignited an economic conflict with Canada, a country that has long been a steadfast ally. Prime Minister Trudeau succinctly captured the sentiment with his somber statement: “We didn’t ask for this.” Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper further highlighted the absurdity by noting, “There is no migrant flow happening from Canada to the United States of any significant numbers. And I’m going to tell you right now, drugs, guns, crime — most of those things flow north, not south.”

This misguided trade war is uniting Canadians across political lines, with both Liberals and Conservatives voicing their disdain for Trump’s actions. The tensions have stirred passions among Canadians, symbolized by the unsettling booing of the Star-Spangled Banner at a recent hockey game. For many, who cherish their personal and cultural ties to the U.S., this situation is nothing short of heartbreaking.

In an unfolding drama marked by President Trump’s characteristically chaotic approach, the economic conflict between the United States and Canada has reached new heights, affecting political and economic landscapes on both sides of the border. The administration’s imposition of tariffs has not only strained relations with Canada but has also drawn concern from within Trump’s own party. Notably, Republican Senator Chuck Grassley has voiced his worries, seeking exemptions for critical agricultural imports like potash to shield American farmers from the economic fallout.

News: Trudeau says Canada will retaliate for Trump’s tariffs with 25 per cent levies on billions of U.S. goods

January 31, 2025

This theatrical maneuvering has ignited retaliation with Ontario Premier Doug Ford taking a decisive stand by cancelling a major contract with Elon Musk’s Starlink. This move is part of broader retaliatory actions that echo across the political spectrum in Canada, as leaders unite to challenge what they perceive as an unjust economic assault.

Prime Minister Trudeau’s dismay captures the sentiment of many Canadians, who see this as an unwarranted conflict disrupting long-standing alliances. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper further underscores the absurdity of the situation, pointing out the lack of significant migration issues from Canada to the U.S., contrary to claims made by the Trump administration.

The tariffs’ economic implications are profound, threatening industries that are vital to both nations. Canada’s retaliatory measures aim to exert pressure but risk exacerbating economic strain. Amidst this turmoil, Canadians are galvanizing, engaging in grassroots efforts to support local businesses and boycott American products, reflecting a spirit of self-reliance and resilience.

News: Ford ‘ripping up’ Ontario’s $100M contract with Elon Musk’s Starlink in wake of U.S. tariffs

January 13, 2025

For Americans opposed to this economic warfare, there’s an opportunity to repair the strained ties by advocating for change and expressing their disapproval to local officials. The potential for a lasting rift looms large, threatening to unravel the deeply rooted friendship between the two countries.

Yet, the situation presents an opportunity for Canada to forge new trade partnerships and diversify its economic relationships. Through strategic actions, mutual understanding, and collaboration, Canada and the U.S. can work towards overcoming these divisions, paving the way for renewed cooperation and mutual respect. By focusing on shared interests and values, both nations can look forward to a future where collaboration ensures prosperity and stability for all.

Featured in this week’s Politico Cartoon Carousel.

President Trump’s recent decision to pause tariffs for Canada and Mexico has provided some relief, but it’s also left many people puzzled. What started as a supposed effort to tackle the fentanyl problem at the northern border seemed more like a clever way to offset tax cuts for the wealthy by making Americans pay more for imports. Instead of a long-term solution, it feels like Canada and Mexico just got a temporary break before facing the same torment again in 30 days.

This situation highlights the fact that America is a deeply divided country, something we Canadians are keenly aware of. They’ve got a strong president, but it feels like the nation is on the brink of coming apart at the seams. Trump’s unpredictable trade tactics have taken a toll on trust, and his not really joking comment about wanting Canada to become the 51st state hasn’t helped matters. It’s made Canada wary of the U.S., shaking the idea that we’re friendly neighbours.

In Canada, there’s a growing “Buy Canadian” sentiment, with more people choosing local products over American ones. Travel habits are shifting too, with many Canadians opting to explore our own country or travel overseas instead of visiting the U.S. This whole ordeal seems to have brought Canadians closer together, uniting them against what they see as pushy tactics from Trump. It’s a sign that his approach might have backfired, not just straining friendships but also changing how people shop and travel.

While having a strong border is important, and addressing the fentanyl issue is a positive step, we should also focus on the more pressing concern of gun trafficking from the U.S. to Canada. As this situation unfolds, it serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining friendly and cooperative relations with our neighbours. Hopefully, we can move back towards working together instead of getting caught up in disagreements.

Just keep telling Trump he’s winning.

Enjoy the making-of video of my February 3 editorial cartoon:

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday December 19, 2024

December 19, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday December 19, 2024

Canada Must Stand Firm Against Trump’s Meddling Ways

September 20, 2024

Canada, a proud G7 nation with a history of strong global leadership and cooperation, finds itself in an embarrassing and humiliating position—the subject of repeated provocations from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. His reckless and inflammatory rhetoric, coupled with aggressive policy proposals, has not only strained Canada-U.S. relations but also raised profound questions about sovereignty, national resilience, and the nature of modern foreign interference.

Trump’s antics have been nothing short of disruptive. His comments about Canada becoming the “51st state” and labelling Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as “Governor of the Great State of Canada” are not only undignified but deeply undermining. Such statements blur the line between joking and serious political discourse, forcing Canadian leaders to address what should be laughable claims in earnest.

November 18, 2024

This is not a matter of harmless banter. Trump’s provocative rhetoric carries weight, as demonstrated by the $1 billion Canadian border security plan unveiled in response to his criticisms of “ridiculous open borders” and alleged drug trafficking. His proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports threaten to destabilize industries and livelihoods on both sides of the border, with Ontario Premier Doug Ford describing it as akin to “a family member stabbing you, right in the heart.” Canada is being forced to react and realign its policies to counteract the whims of a U.S. president-elect who wields his influence like a wrecking ball.

Unlike covert foreign interference—such as the disinformation campaigns and clandestine efforts linked to Russia, India, and Iran—Trump’s meddling is loud, public, and unapologetic. It’s a form of influence that weaponizes social media to provoke, disrupt, and destabilize, all in plain sight. On Truth Social, Trump’s repeated posts about annexation and false claims of the U.S. subsidizing Canada by “over $100,000,000” are designed to stir division and force Canada into a defensive posture.

News: Trump repeats ‘51st State’ jab and false trade-deficit claims

November 8, 2024

As one reader comment noted, “This is how he weasels his ideas into the national conversation, by saying something inappropriate in a joking sort of manner. But we know there is often something serious behind it.” Indeed, Trump’s comments are not just the ramblings of a provocateur but calculated moves to inject his agenda into public discourse and undermine Canada’s standing as a sovereign nation.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this situation is the damage it does to Canada’s sovereignty and international image. Canada is a nation that values its distinct identity, from its universal healthcare system and robust social programs to its commitment to bilingualism and multiculturalism. Trump’s “51st state” rhetoric trivializes these defining elements and reduces Canada to a subsidiary of U.S. interests.

Reader feedback underscores the real danger of such rhetoric. “Calling Canada a ‘state’… could be the beginning of the end of our sovereignty. Lots of water and minerals up here to plunder. We are in danger if this type of rhetoric continues,” one commenter warned. Another drew parallels to Russia’s actions in Ukraine, suggesting that what starts as a joke can evolve into a serious threat.

November 12, 2018

Trump’s meddling extends beyond Canada’s sovereignty to include his vile and misogynistic comments about Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland. Referring to her as “totally toxic” and claiming she was not conducive to making deals, Trump’s remarks echo his long-standing pattern of disparaging strong women in politics, including Kamala Harris, Liz Cheney, and Nancy Pelosi. This behaviour is not only disrespectful but also emblematic of the broader undermining of women’s leadership roles, which should have no place in international diplomacy or politics.

While some Canadian leaders, like Premier Ford, have risen to the occasion with strong rebukes of Trump’s behaviour, others appear less decisive. Trudeau’s “surprise” trip to Mar-a-Lago yielded little more than vague optimism, and his government’s response has yet to fully address the broader implications of Trump’s interference. Meanwhile, political figures like Pierre Poilievre have faced criticism for failing to robustly defend Canada against these affronts.

April 13, 2018

This lack of unity and clarity only emboldens Trump’s meddling. Canada must adopt a coordinated approach that combines assertive diplomacy with tangible measures to protect its interests. This includes strengthening economic resilience against tariff threats, ensuring robust border policies, and unequivocally rejecting any narrative that undermines Canadian sovereignty.

Canadians must also recognize the broader stakes. Trump’s actions are not just an affront to Canada but a symptom of a world where strong nations increasingly exploit weaker ones through overt and covert means. As a G7 country, Canada has a responsibility—to itself and the global community—to stand firm against such tactics and reaffirm the principles of sovereignty, respect, and mutual cooperation.

The humiliation of responding to Trump’s antics is real, but it is not insurmountable. By taking decisive action and refusing to be drawn into his games, Canada can turn this challenge into an opportunity to showcase its strength, unity, and resolve on the world stage. (AI)

Friday June 14, 2024

June 14, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

By Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 14, 2024

*Animated making-of-clip, with hi-fi sound here.

Pierre Poilievre’s Wilful Ignorance is a Betrayal of Leadership

June 7, 2024

Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative Party leader, has refused to access a classified national security and intelligence report on foreign interference, making him the sole federal leader to do so. This decision is not just baffling; it is a dereliction of duty. Leadership is about confronting uncomfortable truths and making informed decisions for the nation’s welfare. Poilievre’s choice to remain in the dark is a display of wilful ignorance that raises serious concerns about his suitability to lead the country.

Perhaps Poilievre is scared of finding out? If members of his party are involved in foreign interference, he would be expected to act decisively. By avoiding the briefing, Poilievre can continue his blissful ignorance and place all the blame on the Liberals. Indeed, the Liberals have much to answer for, having been slow to address foreign interference, but this does not absolve Poilievre from his responsibilities. As the Official Loyal Opposition, it is his job to scrutinize and act upon such crucial matters. His refusal to do so is a failure in his role, raising questions about whether he would similarly decline to see national security reports if he became Prime Minister.

Analysis: A ‘cloud of suspicion’ hangs over Parliament — and no one knows what to do about it

May 5, 2023

Poilievre’s actions demonstrate an unwillingness to genuinely understand the issues at hand. The Conservatives have multiple members on the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) that reviewed the intelligence and wrote the report. If his party is implicated, it is up to him to confront this head-on and take necessary actions. Instead, he chooses to criticize the Liberals without taking proactive steps to address potential threats within his own ranks.

Running for Prime Minister of Canada means dealing with classified information. Access to such reports has not prevented other leaders from advocating for truth and accountability. Canada’s allies in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance routinely manage to balance secrecy with public accountability. Poilievre should follow their example, showing that he can handle sensitive information responsibly while still taking decisive action.

March 17, 2023

For the sake of our country, this is an opportunity for Poilievre to lead where Trudeau has failed. Poilievre could go on camera and declare, “If anyone in the party is helping a foreign power, it will be dealt with decisively. I will not allow it on my watch.” This would demonstrate real leadership and reassure Canadians that he prioritizes national security over partisan politics. Yet, his refusal to engage with the classified report suggests he prefers plausible deniability, especially considering the report includes information on two Conservative leadership races, one of which he won. This behaviour suggests he fears what he might find.

Poilievre’s actions reveal a preference for obfuscation and partisan attacks rather than responsible governance. This is a matter of national security with hints of possible treason. As a citizen and taxpayer, I want to know who is responsible, regardless of their party affiliation. Poilievre should want to know that too if he genuinely aspires to lead the country.

Video: Poilievre ‘deeply irresponsible’ for not reading foreign interference report: NDP leader

April 26, 2024

It is stunning that a leader of the opposition, and a likely next governing party leader, would refuse to view highly sensitive documents crucial to national security. By doing so, Poilievre fails to show the leadership required during times of geopolitical upheaval. Elizabeth May, despite leading a party with only two seats, has shown more seriousness and responsibility on this issue than Poilievre.

While he slams Trudeau for being soft on foreign interference, he refuses to take the opportunity to show what responsible leadership looks like. This was his moment to rise above partisan politics and he chose to stay in the shadows. Canadians deserve leaders who are willing to face the truth and act decisively for the good of the country. Poilievre’s refusal to engage with the classified report is not just disappointing; it is a dangerous abdication of responsibility. In times of national security threats, Canadians need leaders who will confront the issues head-on, not hide from them. Poilievre’s wilful ignorance is a betrayal of the leadership he aspires to. (AI)

Wednesday December 20, 2023

December 20, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

December 20, 2023

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday December 20, 2023

Navigating the Delicate Rift: US-Israel Relations Amidst Gaza Crisis

October 14, 2023

In the aftermath of the October 7 Hamas attack, Israel’s military offensive against Gaza has strained its traditionally unwavering alliance with the United States. Even as President Joe Biden initially supported Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s actions, recent developments have seen a shift in the administration’s stance. Biden’s public criticism of the “indiscriminate bombing” and the rising death toll in Gaza reflects a growing unease in Washington over Israel’s conduct of the war.

The United States, historically a staunch supporter of Israel, is increasingly concerned about the humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza. As the death toll surpasses 18,700, the international community is growing more vocal in calling for an end to Israel’s bombing campaign. The US, cognizant of the need to appease its Arab allies and mitigate public outrage, expects Israel to transition to a more targeted phase of the conflict, minimizing civilian casualties.

News: Biden says Netanyahu must change, Israel losing global support

October 19, 2023

However, Netanyahu’s resistance to heed US advice poses the risk of isolating Israel on the global stage. Washington is also pushing for a post-conflict plan, emphasizing the necessity of a political vision to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Netanyahu’s rejection of working towards a Palestinian state further complicates the situation, as the US and Arab states seek to bolster the Palestinian Authority as an alternative to Hamas.

Critics argue that Netanyahu’s divisive rule has exacerbated the situation. His alignment with ultranationalist parties and attempts to undermine the Palestinian Authority have fuelled internal strife. Additionally, his failure to effectively address the threat posed by Hamas has led to a devastating attack on Israeli soil, further eroding public faith in his leadership.

The opposition leader, Yair Lapid, has shown unwavering support for the Netanyahu-led government’s strategy in Gaza, despite historical misgivings. In his communications with Senate Democrats, Lapid emphasizes the unanimity of purpose in defeating Hamas. However, his formal and strategic approach hints at a broader message – a contrast with Netanyahu’s leadership style. Lapid’s outreach to Democrats is a delicate diplomatic effort, showcasing his ability to engage with a spectrum of political views.

July 25, 2014

The complex dynamics surrounding the Israel-Hamas conflict have become a fault line in Democratic politics, with scenes of devastation in Gaza triggering activism and divisions within the party. While President Biden remains pro-Israel, internal ambivalence, particularly within the Democratic base, poses challenges.

As Israel faces the prospect of discarding Netanyahu, there is uncertainty about a leftward shift in peacemaking and national security policies. Despite dissatisfaction with Netanyahu’s leadership, Israelis overwhelmingly support the military mission against Hamas. Lapid’s potential as an alternative is met with skepticism, with former IDF chief Benny Gantz currently enjoying greater popularity.

The delicate line of communication between Lapid and the Democratic Party reflects the broader challenges in aligning Israeli and American political interests. Lapid’s diplomatic efforts aim to showcase his ability to engage with a diverse range of opinions, distinguishing him from Netanyahu. However, navigating this political tightrope requires careful consideration of domestic and international dynamics.

Ultimately, as the conflict unfolds, the trajectory of US-Israel relations may hinge on mainstream Democrats’ willingness to reconcile with the complex realities in Israeli politics. Delicate phone calls and strategic communication may be the best immediate solution in bridging the gap between distant political cousins on the centre-left. The path to a more comfortable bond may require time, a shift in political landscapes, and a shared commitment to lasting peace in the region. (AI)

*** * * * * ***

Letter to the Editor The Hamilton Spectator, Friday December 22, 2023

Cartoon not based on reality

Letter to the Editor

In Graeme MacKay’s Dec. 20 editorial cartoon, he portrays Israel as a warmonger desperately grasping rockets, being held back only by Uncle Sam. Whatever world MacKay is depicting in his cartoon, it’s certainly not the real world, because incredibly, nowhere does Hamas, the Gaza-based Islamic terrorist group, appear. Hamas is the perpetrator of the Oct. 7 massacre in Israel, the largest mass killing of Jews since the Holocaust, and which continues to hold hundreds of Israeli hostages in Gaza and use its own people, the civilian population in Gaza, as human shields. Israel is fighting a war over its very survival against Hamas, a genocidal and fanatical terrorist organization that seeks its destruction. Yet bizarrely, it is Israel depicted by MacKay as war monger, seeking out blood for apparently no reason at all.

Robert Walker, Honest Reporting Canada

Thursday October 19, 2023

October 19, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday October 19, 2023

President Biden’s Diplomatic Balancing Act in the Israel-Palestine Conflict

October 14, 2023

As President Biden ventured into the heart of the Israel-Palestine conflict, he demonstrated a careful and calibrated approach to navigating one of the world’s most enduring crises. With escalating violence in the region and deep-rooted divisions within his own party, Biden’s diplomatic efforts are at a crucial juncture, posing both political risks and opportunities.

President Biden’s unwavering support for Israel following a devastating Hamas attack in Tel Aviv was an expected, yet bold move. The President’s stance, largely in line with Washington’s dominant position, earned him praise from both sides of the aisle. His extensive foreign policy experience made handling an international crisis seem like familiar territory, even amid grave geopolitical dangers.

News: White House confirms president won’t meet King Abdullah II, Palestinian leader Abbas or President al-Sisi of Egypt after airstrike

October 18, 2022

While foreign policy rarely takes center stage in American elections, Biden’s role as a statesman abroad, particularly if he can help de-escalate the rising tensions, could offer a welcome respite from the barrage of domestic challenges that have affected his approval ratings.

In Tel Aviv, Biden reaffirmed America’s support for Israel but, in a subtle shift, he offered humanitarian assistance to displaced Palestinians. He also cautioned against repeating past mistakes, referencing the U.S. response to the 9/11 attacks. This nuanced approach demonstrated Biden’s commitment to finding a path to peace in the region, even as tensions flared.

However, Biden’s task is made more challenging by the growing anger within the progressive wing of his party, especially as Israel intensified its military actions in Gaza. Progressive Democrats accused him of supporting a war that had already claimed the lives of thousands of Palestinians. This anger reached a peak after a deadly explosion at a Gaza City hospital, sparking protests across the Middle East and forcing Biden to cancel his planned visit to Jordan.

April 26, 2023

This precarious tightrope that Biden is walking reflects the complex nature of the Israel-Palestine conflict. While many Republicans have simplified the issue, seeing it in black and white terms, the progressive base of the Democratic Party views it through a different lens. Younger Democrats, in particular, are skeptical of Israeli policies toward Palestinians and are reluctant to support military action, even in response to a Hamas attack.

To address these concerns, a group of progressive members of Congress signed a letter calling for the restoration of essential supplies to Gaza. Another House resolution demanded an immediate de-escalation and ceasefire. While Biden’s defenders argue that he is privately pushing Israel to minimize civilian casualties, critics warn that if he aligns too closely with Israel, he may be held accountable for excessive use of force.

Opinion: President Biden’s Finest Hour

December 1, 2012

Amid this internal party strife, Biden’s trip to Israel is seen as an opportunity for de-escalation. Larry Cohen, chairman of Our Revolution, a left-wing political organization, expressed hope that the visit could prevent further violence.

Public opinion on this matter is mixed, with polls indicating that Americans are more confident in Biden’s ability to handle the Israel-Palestine conflict than domestic issues. However, the younger and more progressive wing of the Democratic Party remains skeptical of his approach, particularly when it comes to military support for Israel.

The key challenge for President Biden lies in balancing American interests, maintaining relations with a long-standing ally, and addressing the concerns of his party’s progressive wing. It’s a delicate act, but if he can successfully defuse tensions and contribute to a lasting peace, it may enhance his reputation as a seasoned diplomat and provide a welcome boost to his re-election bid. In the tumultuous world of foreign policy, Biden’s cautious and measured steps are a testament to his experience and diplomatic competence. (AI)

Editorial cartoon printed in the Hamilton Spectator and the Toronto Star.