Trump – mackaycartoons

Tuesday May 27 2025

May 27, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday May 27 2025

King Charles III’s visit to Canada underscores the country’s sovereignty and distinct identity amid geopolitical tensions with the U.S.

Canada’s Sovereign Stand Against U.S. Pressure

May 6, 2023

As King Charles III arrives in Canada for his first visit as monarch, the event is rich with meaning and strategic foresight. Prime Minister Mark Carney’s invitation for the King to deliver the Speech from the Throne is more than a ceremonial gesture; it’s a powerful assertion of Canada’s independence and distinct identity. This move comes at a time when U.S. President Donald Trump has been making dismissive remarks about Canada’s status, and it serves as a clear message that Canada stands proudly on its own.

When Carney was sworn in as Prime Minister, he described Canada as a country “built on the bedrock of three peoples: Indigenous, French, and British.” This statement captures the essence of Canada’s diverse heritage, highlighting a nation that neither leans towards American influence nor forgets its roots. By inviting King Charles III to read the Throne Speech, Carney underscores this foundation, setting a tone that is both inclusive and assertive.

Opinion: King Charles’s visit to Canada: A Commonwealth flex with an audience of one

May 17, 2025

Carney’s use of this royal visit as a diplomatic tool showcases his government’s approach to international relations. His first official trip to Paris, London, and Iqaluit mirrored this blend, reinforcing ties with France and the UK while acknowledging the crucial role of Indigenous communities within Canada. During his time in London, Carney extended the invitation to the King, who was eager to accept. This isn’t just about tradition; it’s about strengthening the bonds that link Canada to the Commonwealth and its constitutional monarchy.

The visit takes place at a critical time when Canada’s relationship with its southern neighbour is being tested. Trump’s repeated comments about Canada potentially becoming the 51st U.S. state have been met with widespread concern. In this context, the royal visit is a clear message to Trump—and the world—that Canada’s sovereignty is firm. It’s a symbolic gesture, reminding Trump that Canada’s path is its own.

BBC: King’s invitation to Canada sends a message to Trump – and the world

June 10, 2022

While the visit includes traditional ceremonies, like military honours and a ceremonial tree planting, it serves a deeper purpose. It highlights the ongoing role of the monarchy in Canada’s governance and its relevance today. Including Indigenous leaders and cultural elements reflects Canada’s commitment to reconciliation and acknowledging its diverse heritage.

Public opinion on the monarchy might be mixed, but the significance of this visit goes beyond individual views. It reaffirms Canada’s heritage and declares its future on the world stage. The monarchy, often seen as a relic, finds new relevance as a diplomatic tool in modern times. Carney’s actions show a keen understanding of the power of symbolism in global politics and the importance of defining a nation’s identity through its history and constitution.

News: Why King Charles’s upcoming visit to Canada is unprecedented in many ways

King Charles III’s visit to Canada is more than a ceremonial occasion; it’s a defining moment in Prime Minister Carney’s diplomatic strategy. It’s a bold statement of independence and a celebration of the diverse peoples that form Canada. As Trump watches, this royal visit serves as a reminder of Canada’s steadfast independence and commitment to its principles. This historic moment isn’t just about the past; it’s about a clear vision for the future, where Canada’s identity is proudly asserted on its own terms.

The Crown Reconsidered by The Graeme Gallery

Tuesday May 27 2025

Read on Substack

Thursday May 22 2025

May 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 22 2025

Shilling a Missile Defence System

May 21, 2025

In light of President Donald Trump’s recent introduction of the “Golden Dome” missile defence scheme, there’s a lot of skepticism. We’ve seen similar programs before, and they’ve often been met with doubts about their practicality, cost, and strategic benefit.

Back in 2005, Canada chose not to join a U.S.-led missile defence initiative, largely because of concerns about sovereignty, financial costs, and the risk of increased militarization. Those concerns are still relevant today, especially with our current relationship with the U.S. under Trump being quite strained.

Archival News: Canada Says It Won’t Join Missile Shield With the U.S.

January 18, 2025

Trump’s claim that Canada is eager to join the “Golden Dome” seems more like political posturing than a reflection of our actual defence priorities. Investing billions in a system that might not even materialize is risky, particularly when we have more immediate defence needs to address.

Given the changes in our relationship with the U.S., marked by trade disputes and Trump’s controversial rhetoric, it’s important for Canada to take a different approach. We should politely decline participation in the “Golden Dome” and focus on upgrading our own defence systems to directly enhance our national security.

News: Canada wants to join Golden Dome missile-defence program, Trump says

April 30, 2025

Our partnership with Australia for the Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN) is a great example of this strategy. This collaboration not only diversifies our military procurement but also strengthens our ties with countries that share similar values. The JORN system provides proven, advanced radar capabilities that are perfect for Canada’s needs, especially in the Arctic.

News: Canada partners with Australia on radar system to detect threats from Russia and China

If there’s one positive outcome from Trump’s actions towards allies, it’s that Canada is learning to rely less on the U.S. and pursue partnerships that truly align with our national interests.

Investing in systems like JORN is a smart use of our defence resources, ensuring Canada remains secure, independent, and strategically sound in a complex world.

From Star Wars to DOGE Wars

Here we go again with Missile Defense. Donald Trump has revived a concept reminiscent of Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) from the mid-1980s, which aimed to make incoming missiles “impotent and obsolete.” Dubbed “Star Wars” by the media, it seemed inspired by the era’s popular sci-fi films like “The Empire Strikes Back” and “Return of the Jedi.”

This time around, Trump has not called upon the scientific community—the very sector of innovation that he and Elon Musk have rendered “impotent and obsolete” themselves, thanks to the massive DOGE chainsaw massacre they’ve unleashed on the federal civil service and science funding.

Trump optimistically believes that a missile defence solution will materialize before his term ends in three years. While missile defence has notably benefited Israel, shielding it from regional threats, the North American continent presents a far more complex challenge.

Although Reagan’s challenge led to some technological advancements, the dissolution of the USSR, rather than SDI, primarily eased global military tensions. Following the Soviet collapse, the urgency for missile defence subsided. When George W. Bush proposed a similar initiative, Canada, under Paul Martin, declined, echoing the earlier decision under Jean Chrétien to distance from the U.S. invasion of Iraq. These decisions drew a line in the alliance with the U.S., but also highlighted Canada’s failure to boost its own defence investments.

Canada Says It Won’t Join Missile Shield With the U.S. (Cartoon from February 25, 2005) The Canadian government declined to participate in the North American missile defense system, despite President George W. Bush’s lobbying efforts, marking a symbolic setback for the Bush administration as it attempted to mend relations with allies post-Iraq invasion.

Instead, Canada fell short of its NATO commitments under both Harper and Trudeau, leaving it unprepared as the post-WWII security umbrella provided by the U.S. began to retract. Now, as the U.S. pushes us away, Canada must strengthen its own defences, recognizing that a military partnership with the U.S. will not be what it once was.

Importantly, Canada has invested in the Australian Jindalee Operational Radar Network (JORN), a system that enhances long-range surveillance and defence capabilities. This partnership with Australia signifies a strategic shift towards diversifying defence alliances and technologies, reflecting Canada’s need to independently bolster its security measures.

A continental defence system involving Canada is crucial, but procurement won’t always serve to bolster the U.S. military-industrial complex. The economic costs of Canada’s gradual detachment from America’s security framework must be understood by both nations as they navigate this new era.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field.
Please have a look at the animated making of video (it’s just 34 seconds long):

Friday May 16 2025

May 16, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday May 16 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star. Also on Reddit.

Ontario’s Budget Crossroads: Investing in Uncertain Times

April 16, 2025

As Ontario gets ready to roll out its provincial budget, it’s clear that we’re dealing with some serious challenges. The Trump tariffs have hit our manufacturing and auto parts sectors hard, creating uncertainty not just here, but worldwide. In these times, it’s crucial to focus on smart investments rather than cutbacks to keep our economy stable and growing.

The tariffs are a major blow to Ontario’s economy, affecting key industries that drive our prosperity. This budget needs to show a commitment to helping these sectors through targeted investments that can make a real difference.

News: Ford pledges Ontario budget with infrastructure spending, not cuts, to battle U.S. tariffs

One area that stands out is infrastructure. Investing in things like better transportation, modern public facilities, and clean energy projects can create jobs now and set us up for success down the road. These projects boost productivity and competitiveness, and they can spark broader economic growth.

January 29, 2025

However, we’ve seen mistakes in the past with spending, like the expensive cancellations of renewable energy projects, the dubious Highway 401 tunnel idea, and the controversial decision to open up parts of the Greenbelt for development. These moves have raised concerns about wasteful spending and environmental impacts. Going forward, the government needs to make sure that money is spent wisely, with clear benefits and a focus on transparency.

It’s also essential to protect services like healthcare and education from budget cuts. These are crucial for everyone’s well-being and future potential.

News: Ten things you should know about Ontario’s budget

March 27, 2024

As we look to this new budget, there’s a chance to make choices that support both fiscal responsibility and smart investment. By prioritizing infrastructure and protecting our natural spaces like the Greenbelt, Ontario can tackle the current economic challenges and build a stronger future. This approach not only addresses immediate needs but also aligns with long-term goals, ensuring stability and growth. In these uncertain times, especially with the far-reaching effects of the Trump tariffs, thoughtful investment will be key to overcoming global economic challenges and securing a sustainable path forward for Ontario.

No Substack posting today. It’s Spring and duties to mow the lawn come before substack postings. Instead, enjoying the toiling I did today on the boring subject of provincial budget time. See the static version in tomorrow’s Hamilton Spectator. Don’t forget to like, if you like what you see here, it encourages me to post.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Saturday March 15, 2025

March 15, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday March 15, 2025

Poilievre’s New Game Plan: Charting a Course in Carney’s Canada

March 14, 2025

As Canada’s political scene shifts, Pierre Poilievre and the Conservative Party face new hurdles with Mark Carney stepping in as the Liberal leader. Poilievre’s strategy has long focused on opposing Justin Trudeau, leveraging criticism and combative rhetoric. However, with Trudeau stepping down and Carney taking charge, this approach may no longer resonate as effectively.

Mark Carney brings a fresh perspective and a solid reputation from his financial career. His leadership style, perceived as calm and competent, stands in contrast to Poilievre’s aggressive tactics. Recent polls show Carney is viewed more favourably in several leadership areas, which could spell trouble for Poilievre, who has thrived on opposing a now-absent Trudeau.

Opinion: If the next election is a likability contest, Mark Carney’s arrival looks like trouble for Pierre Poilievre

March 11, 2025

Furthermore, Poilievre’s alignment with rhetoric similar to Donald Trump’s, using phrases like “woke” and “globalist,” may alienate voters who are looking for unity rather than division. This is especially critical as Canada faces external pressures from Trump’s policies, such as trade tariffs. Poilievre’s core supporters, often likened to “Maple MAGA,” may appreciate this stance, but it risks isolating those seeking a more inclusive approach.

Herein lies Poilievre’s internal conflict: the dilemma of whether to cut ties with the “Maple MAGA” ideology that has both anchored and propelled his political journey. This weight, adorned with the familiar yet burdensome motifs of nationalism, presents a significant decision point. To sever this connection might mean broadening his appeal to a wider electorate, yet maintaining it could secure the steadfast loyalty of his current base.

With Carney offering a hopeful vision, Poilievre needs to adjust his strategy. Attacking Carney might appear desperate if Canadians view Carney as a beacon of positive change. The Conservatives must shift from merely opposing to proposing real solutions that address Canada’s needs.

Opinion: There’s no Pierre Poilievre without Justin Trudeau. That’s why the Conservative Leader seems broken

January 23, 2025

In this new political era, Poilievre has the chance to broaden his appeal by focusing on unity and constructive policies. Success will depend on adaptability and addressing the issues that matter most to Canadians, shaping the country’s future leadership and direction. Whether Poilievre decides to embrace change or cling to the familiar weight of “Maple MAGA” will be a testament to his vision for Canada’s future.

In the world of Canadian politics, my editorial cartoons aim to capture the multifaceted challenges faced by our leaders. Yesterday’s cartoon highlighted the main challenge for Prime Minister Mark Carney: the baggage he inherits from Justin Trudeau. Bringing hand-me-down ministers into his cabinet offers convenient fodder for the Conservative narrative that his leadership is merely an extension of the “Sunny Ways” Liberal government of yesteryear. While some appreciated this portrayal, others took umbrage—one commenter even calling me a “3rd rate cartoonist.”

For those who are blinded by partisanship they probably shouldn’t pay attention to editorial cartoons. Our designs in editorial cartoons is to draw out the uncomfortable hard truths even to those afflicted by an incurable case of political stalwarts.

For the critics, today’s cartoon might offer a fresh perspective. This time, I depict Pierre Poilievre shackled to “Maple MAGA,” a term that encapsulates the base of supporters who echo the alt-right and far-right rhetoric. Despite my attempts, I couldn’t fit “Timbit Trump” into the illustration, though credit is due to Karina Gould for coining it. This is the first time I’ve used “Maple MAGA” in a cartoon, and it aptly describes Poilievre’s supporters who parrot narratives from American MAGA influencers like Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson.

Their rhetoric often drops terms like WEF, Soros, and Globalist, peppered with phrases like “Justine Trudope” or “Justinflation,” adding a distinctly Canadian twist—hence, “Maple MAGA.” Both Poilievre and his base are experiencing a bit of an identity crisis. The notion of “Canada First” seems unlikely to resonate against a backdrop of global interdependence, especially when compared to the isolationist “America First.”

Poilievre’s contemplation of cutting foreign aid reflects this struggle, as he remains unable to unshackle himself from the support of his crucial base. Whether these depictions resonate or provoke, my hope is to spark meaningful dialogue about the paths these figures are carving out for Canada’s future.

Please enjoy the making-of my Saturday March 15, 2025 editorial cartoon:

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Cartoons of Confrontation

March 1, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

The Trump Menace vs. Ford’s Strong Mandate

Saturday March 1, 2025 | Newsletter 18

This week marked a crucial moment in Ontario politics as Premier Doug Ford’s snap election campaign reached its peak. Please hang with me non-Ontario subscribers, there’s plenty covered below that relates to you! As Ford sought a strong mandate to tackle pressing issues, Donald Trump’s influence loomed large, not only through his bull-headed rhetoric on tariffs and annexation against Canada but also through his increasingly disturbing alignment with the tyrannical figure in Vladimir Putin. My editorial cartoons reflected these ongoing debates about housing, electric vehicle investments, and international diplomacy, capturing the tension between regional politics and global threats. Let’s dive into the highlights of the week.

Canada-U.S. Trade Obstructions, Nov. 16, 1935

But first, I love exploring the archives of my editorial cartoonist predecessor, where I found an insightful piece from 90 years ago that resonates today. The cartoon by Ivan Glassco, printed in the Hamilton Spectator, shows Canadian Prime Minister Mackenzie King and U.S. President Roosevelt breaking through trade barriers, symbolizing cooperation. This reflects their efforts to reduce tariffs through the Canada–United States Reciprocal Trade Agreement during the Great Depression. The Hawley-Smoot Tariff earlier had worsened economic conditions by sparking retaliatory tariffs and trade declines. This historic lesson reminds us of the wrong direction we’re heading towards, the complexities and costs of protectionism, underscoring the importance of fostering open trade.

Tuesday, February 25: “The High-Stakes Game of Politics”

The above cartoon portrays Premier Doug Ford playing a losing Blackjack game with Donald Trump, symbolizing his risky position on Ontario’s electric vehicle investments. As the election day neared, both Ford and the opposition ignored the significant EV sector, while Trump’s focus on fossil fuels overshadows green energy discussions. The uncertainty surrounding Ford’s strategy raises questions about its future impact on Ontario.

Wednesday, February 26: “Inflatable Promises and Real Disconnect”

In this cartoon, Doug Ford stands in front of an inflatable castle labelled “Affordable Housing for All,” oblivious to the rising housing crisis. A maintenance worker’s remark about the castle’s air supply underscores the gap between political promises and reality. With only a day left until voting, it was perplexing to see Ford’s party leading in the polls, despite their inadequate housing strategies and the all-too-familiar sight of tent encampments scattered across the province.

Thursday, February 27: “Kings, Thieves, and Minerals”

This cartoon offers a sharp critique of the proposed U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal, portraying Trump as a king flanked by Putin and a beleaguered Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Critics argue that the deal represents economic exploitation rather than sincere support for Ukraine. The cartoon captures a growing disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy and prompts crucial questions about global relations and democracy. As we look ahead to 2025, can the USA still claim to be the leader of the free world? This moment in history seems to mark the beginning of the end for that long-held assertion.

Friday, February 28: “Mandates on Ice”

This cartoon leans on my long running comic strip showing a young Donald Trump in a fur coat appearing in the snowy headbanger habitat of Etobicoke with Doug Ford and friends, each showcasing exaggerated “mandates.” Ford’s push for a strong mandate amid U.S. trade tariffs allowed him to divert attention from pressing domestic issues like scandals, healthcare in crisis, and a lack of affordable housing. This absurd scene captures the shifting dynamics in Ontario’s political landscape as Ford sought a third consecutive majority government.

Saturday, March 1: “Royal Charms and Diplomatic Alarms”

Drawn during the doldrums of the Ontario election’s anticlimactic vote tabulations, this cartoon depicts King Charles III, recruited by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, to use his royal charm to win favour with Trump. While Starmer’s approach using the monarch may offer temporary relief, it contrasts sharply with the challenges Canada faces under Trump’s aggressive stance. The cartoon invites reflection on the effectiveness of diplomatic strategies in today’s political climate.

Saturday, March 1: “The Spectacle of Diplomacy”

This cartoon depicts an absurd, but in reality, disgraceful Oval Office meeting between Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Trump, and J.D. Vance, comparing it to a wrestling match. Zelenskyy’s evident frustration contrasts sharply with Trump’s preening and flamboyant demeanor, reflecting a concerning shift in U.S. foreign policy. Meanwhile, the portrait of Vladimir Putin looms large, symbolizing the growing influence of tyranny that influences these interactions. The cartoon criticizes the focus on showmanship over genuine diplomacy, calling for a more thoughtful approach to international relations.

* * * * * * * *

As we wrap up this week’s reflections, we welcome a much-needed break from the usual hustle of Ontario politics. Premier Doug Ford is enjoying a brief honeymoon period after his recent election campaign, giving him (and editorial cartoonists) some time to focus on other important issues. However, the influence of figures like Trump and Putin still affects our discussions. If Ford plays by the rules, he might outlast Trump, who, in all likelihood, won’t play by the rules.

I hope my editorial cartoons have highlighted ongoing debates about housing, electric vehicles, and diplomacy, showing how local politics connects with global issues. Ford won his strong mandate primarily because of the support from a small portion of the 45% of eligible voters who turned out.

Let’s take a moment to appreciate this quieter time for the next day or so, as next week promises to bring more political excitement. The federal Liberal leadership race will conclude with the announcement of a new leader, and Canada will find out who its next Prime Minister will be. We can only guess what challenges lie ahead, especially with the unpredictable situation in the White House. Given recent trends since November 4, 2024, new challenges are likely to arise (spoiler note) in the coming days, influenced by Trump. Expect him to make appearances in my cartoons next week… yet again.

Thank you to everyone who continues to subscribe to this weekly newsletter! I typically release posts every Saturday morning, offering a summary of the week through my editorial cartoons. My aim is to keep you informed without overwhelming you with constant notifications. Throughout the week, I also share daily ‘notes’ on my Substack, which enrich my weekly newsletters and feature animated versions of my daily cartoons.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will always be free. Thank you for your continued support!