As Canada’s federal election draws to a close, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has become an unexpected yet dominant figure in shaping the political discourse. His comments on tariffs, trade agreements, and even the audacious suggestion of Canada as the 51st state have stirred the waters, presenting Canadian voters with three pivotal questions: “Carney or Poilievre: Who’s more Trumpy?”; “Carney or Poilievre: Who’s best for Dealing With Trump?”; and “Carney or Poilievre: Who does Trump Prefer?”
Who’s More Trumpy? In terms of policies and demeanour, Pierre Poilievre undeniably channels more of Trump’s attributes. His rhetoric, which echoes Trump’s nationalist populism, includes slogans that promote a “Canada First” agenda. Poilievre’s approach to reducing government influence, skepticism of international organizations, and a confrontational style resonates with Trump’s signature tactics. On the other hand, Mark Carney embodies a more traditional and balanced leadership approach, prioritizing multilateral cooperation and economic stability. Carney’s focus on diplomacy and evidence-based decision-making starkly contrasts with the more brash techniques associated with Trump.
Who’s Best for Dealing With Trump? Despite Poilievre’s ideological similarities with Trump, this doesn’t necessarily make him the best candidate to handle Trump on the international stage. There’s a legitimate concern that Poilievre’s alignment might lead to submission during negotiations, reminiscent of some Republican figures in the U.S. Conversely, Mark Carney, with his extensive background in economics and crisis management, is well-equipped to engage with Trump from a position of informed authority. Trump’s acknowledgment of Carney’s economic expertise likely prompts him to take Carney more seriously than a leader whose policies merely mirror his own.
Who Does Trump Prefer? While it might seem that Trump would naturally favour a leader like Poilievre due to shared ideologies, the reality is more complex. Trump’s respect for Carney’s expertise and strategic acumen is evident. Known for his transactional approach, Trump likely sees value in Carney’s ability to address complex economic issues, understanding that a competent counterpart in Canada could lead to more productive engagements rather than simple ideological alignment.
The assumption that Trump would prefer Poilievre simply due to ideological kinship oversimplifies Trump’s pragmatic nature. Trump recognizes Carney’s capabilities and respects his economic insights, understanding that effective leadership involves not just agreement but the capacity for meaningful engagement. As Canadians cast their votes, these considerations emphasize the importance of selecting a leader who can effectively stand up to Trump’s pressures while also facilitating constructive discussions in U.S.-Canada relations. In this election, Carney’s combination of diplomatic skill and economic expertise may offer Canada the most effective path forward in addressing the challenges posed by the Trump era.
Reflection Time
I’ve only got two more editorial cartoons to draw before voting day, and this one featuring Pierre Poilievre consulting the magic mirror counts as one of them! It seems fitting, especially since no U.S. President in living memory has influenced our election so much as Donald Trump has. His comments and antics are really shaping how we view our leaders, especially when it comes to Poilievre and Mark Carney.
As I’m sketching this out, it’s hard not to see how Poilievre channels Trump’s vibe with his “Canada First” attitude and confrontational style. But then there’s Carney, who offers a more diplomatic and balanced approach. It really raises the question: who’s actually better suited to deal with Trump on the global stage?
While Poilievre might seem like a natural fit for Trump due to their shared ideologies, I think Carney’s economic expertise could give him an edge in negotiations. Trump might actually respect Carney’s skills more than just having someone who echoes his populist rhetoric.
It’s fascinating (and a bit concerning) to watch history unfold right before our eyes. So, as we get closer to the polls, let’s think about who can really stand up to Trump’s pressures and foster productive discussions for Canada.
Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 25, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!
You Tube: Pre-Election Day Reflection https://youtu.be/_9UWr9hliC4
As the North American auto sector faces unprecedented challenges, spurred in large part by former President Donald Trump’s aggressive trade policies, Canada finds itself at a crossroads. Trump’s strategy to fortify a domesticated American auto industry has sent ripples across borders, prompting Canada to reconsider its economic alliances and environmental commitments. In light of these developments, it may be time for Canada to chart a new course, embracing a green future that welcomes electric vehicles (EVs) from Europe and even China.
Trump’s approach to the auto industry, characterized by protectionism and high tariffs, has created an unstable environment for Canadian automakers. With tariffs on steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles, Canada faces increasing costs and competitive disadvantages, threatening the viability of its auto sector. The U.S. administration’s focus on bringing manufacturing back to American soil has left Canada with dwindling options and a pressing need to diversify its economic partnerships.
In this context, the opportunity to rethink Canada’s green future is both timely and necessary. The global shift towards sustainable transportation presents a chance for Canada to align its policies with environmental goals, reducing reliance on fossil fuels and promoting cleaner energy. Electric vehicles are at the forefront of this movement, and international manufacturers offer promising alternatives.
February 5, 2025
European EVs: Europe has long been a leader in environmental regulations and innovation, producing high-quality electric vehicles that meet stringent standards. By strengthening ties with European automakers, Canada can benefit from advanced technology and sustainable practices, positioning itself as a leader in the green transition.
Chinese EVs: China, with its rapid advancements in electric vehicle technology, presents another viable option. Companies like BYD have made significant strides, offering affordable, environmentally friendly vehicles that could significantly boost EV adoption in Canada. Despite political tensions, the economic and environmental benefits of engaging with Chinese manufacturers are compelling.
It is clear that maintaining the status quo with the U.S. is no longer sustainable for Canada’s auto industry. The need to pursue independent economic policies that prioritize Canada’s interests has never been more apparent. By reconsidering tariffs and fostering partnerships with Europe and China, Canada can secure its place in the global green economy.
This strategic realignment would not only support Canada’s environmental objectives but also provide consumers with more choices and competitive pricing. Allowing more affordable EVs into the Canadian market would accelerate the transition from gasoline vehicles, reducing emissions and promoting sustainability.
As Canada stands at the precipice of change, the decision to embrace a new path is not just an economic necessity but an opportunity to lead in the fight against climate change. By welcoming European and Chinese electric vehicles, Canada can redefine its future, ensuring a resilient and sustainable auto industry that aligns with its environmental values. In this pivotal moment, Canada has the chance to set a precedent for innovation and collaboration, paving the way for a truly green future.
A Green Lining?
As I sat down to sketch this editorial cartoon, I can’t help but feel like I’m venturing into risky, perhaps even crazy, territory. Our usual product is cynicism, and there’s plenty of that to go around with the grim prospect of Trump’s trade tariffs threatening to decimate the Canadian auto sector. Trump’s intentions seem clear, telegraphed with the precision of a maestro conducting an orchestra of chaos. But as I contemplate the future, a flicker of opportunity emerges – in tandem with the silver lining that’s rallied Canadians around the flag.
Before the Biden administration pressured Canada into imposing tariffs on Chinese-built EVs, there was an intriguing development. The President of Ford Canada couldn’t hide his admiration for a Chinese model. According to Car and Driver, Ford CEO Jim Farley, in a surprising confession, revealed that he had been driving a Xiaomi SU7, imported from Shanghai, and he didn’t want to give it up. His words, a radical acknowledgment of the competitive threat posed by Chinese automakers like Xiaomi and BYD, resonate in this new reality.
While politicians play the wait-and-see game with Trump, wondering if his tariff brinkmanship is mere leverage or a harbinger of “Liberation Day” on April 2nd, the consequences loom large. If Trump’s gambit unfolds as feared, the carnage will be swift and severe, leaving American car sales in Canada in tatters. They’ll become costly relics, fossil-fuelled dinosaurs in an era that increasingly favours electric innovation.
It’s hard to imagine this scenario just months ago, but here we are. The idea of embracing Chinese EVs doesn’t seem so far-fetched anymore. They’re electric, highly rated, and affordable. In contrast, our closest ally has turned adversarial, seemingly intent on causing harm. The notion of leaning into a new partnership, once unthinkable, now seems like a reasonable course of action in a world reshaped by Trump’s unpredictable maneuvers.
As I draw, I embrace the riskiness of these thoughts. Maybe it’s crazy, but in the unfolding new reality that Trump is orchestrating, it doesn’t seem so outlandish after all.
Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 27, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!
Cartoonist Graeme MacKay nailed it. The North American auto sector doesn’t care about EVs — except to the extent that EVs threaten their lucrative business of keeping internal combustion engines running. In this, it has found common cause with the fossil fuel industry, which also stands to lose out as the public increasingly recognizes the superiority of EVs.
We see evidence for the North American auto sector’s duplicity in its move to change its rapid-charging standard from the global Combined Charging System to Tesla’s previously proprietary plug, a move that makes no sense except as a tactic to dissuade people from purchasing EVs. Yet it does provide an opening for the Canadian government to fight back in U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war, by insisting that all EVs made in Canada use CCS and that all new EVs sold in Canada be compatible with CCS.
Of course, that would require a federal government that’s willing to stand up to corporate interests, so it won’t happen.
In recent weeks, the trade relationship between the United States and Canada has deteriorated alarmingly, driven by President Donald Trump’s decision to impose punitive tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum. These actions are more than mere economic measures; they represent a unilateral escalation of trade hostilities that threaten to destabilize industries and economies on both sides of the border. In response, Canada finds itself with few options but to retaliate, and Doug Ford has emerged as an unexpected champion of Canadian interests in this trade war.
The imposition of a 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum by the Trump administration is an aggressive maneuver that places immense pressure on a sector reliant on American consumers for 90% of its output. The potential devastation to Canada’s steel industry is undeniable, and the ripple effects could lead to economic downturns on both sides of the border. With President Trump openly acknowledging the possibility of a recession, the stakes have never been higher.
Doug Ford’s approach to the situation has been assertive and confrontational, embodying the spirit of a pitbull in his strategic retaliation against Trump. While not all Canadians agree with Ford’s tactics, it is undeniable that his actions have caught the attention of the U.S. administration. In the face of bullying, Canada’s only viable strategy is to kick back, and Ford seems determined to show that Canada will not be intimidated.
The necessity of retaliation is further underscored by the sentiment among Canadians that we are being bullied. The imposition of such tariffs is not just an economic issue; it is a challenge to Canada’s sovereignty and economic stability. Retaliatory measures are not a choice but an imperative to protect national interests. As commentators have suggested, Canada must consider leveraging other aspects of trade, such as imposing export taxes on critical resources like potash, oil, and electricity, to exert pressure on the U.S. market.
Moreover, this situation presents an opportunity for Canada to reassess its trade relationships and seek alliances beyond North America. Building stronger ties with Europe and Asia could provide a buffer against the volatility of U.S. policies and foster economic resilience.
The path forward requires a combination of strategic diplomacy and firm economic measures. While diplomacy remains essential, the real battle lies in the realm of political and economic influence. Canada must engage in a full-scale persuasion campaign to make American consumers aware of the consequences of Trump’s tariffs on their daily lives. As Jaime Watt aptly described, this campaign should focus on ensuring that every price increase, supply chain disruption, and economic pain is directly linked to its source: Donald Trump.
In conclusion, while the current trade conflict with the U.S. poses significant challenges, it also presents an opportunity for Canada to demonstrate strength and strategic acumen. By standing firm and retaliating decisively, Canada can protect its interests and show that it will not be cowed by aggressive unilateral actions. In the face of a bully, sometimes the only option is to fight back, and Canada stands ready to do just that.
Today was a whirlwind. It began with a mission to draw attention to the 5th anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic declaration and the unsettling return of measles, thanks to anti-science and vaccine hesitancy. But in the “Golden Era” of Donald Trump, plans shift at the drop of a hat. Morning headlines blared that the hot headed President was threatening a whopping 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum. I live in Hamilton, the Pittsburgh of Canada, so steel manufacturing is a big interest to me. This was his reaction to my provincial premier, Doug Ford’s announcement yesterday about billing American users for Ontario’s electricity.
See how disruptive one man can be? It’s practically impossible to focus on other stuff – Yet charges are made by Trumpies that we’re the ones afflicted with TDS.
By day’s end, the scene had dramatically shifted. After gyrations in the markets, a flurry of phone calls and negotiations, Ford wisely decided to rescind his threats, buying some breathing room for both sides. In the midst of this diplomatic ballet, I sketched out a cartoon that captures the day’s essence. Mark Carney, the new Canadian Liberal leader and prime minister designate, stands confidently, the new guy in the neighbourhood, gesturing toward a fierce pitbull—Doug Ford—barking vigorously. Carney quips, “Doug’s harmless. He’s just a ‘tariffic’ guardian.” Meanwhile, a moving truck labelled “PM Designate Movers” hints at the transition in leadership. Overlooking it all, Trump stands on a balcony, his stern expression a testament to the day’s tensions. It’s a satirical take on the relentless political dynamics and trade tensions that colour these times. Oh what fun it brings.
Here’s the making-of clip for the March 12, 2025 cartoon:
By Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday, March 2, 2013
How U.S. spending cuts can hurt Canada
The billions in automatic spending cuts in the U.S., which come into effect today, could have an impact on cross-border trade with Canada as well as contribute to a general economic slowdown.
“It’s very hard to say,” Ambarish Chandra, assistant professor of economics at the University of Toronto, said of the potential effects here.
“I think even within the U.S. it’s not clear where the axe will fall. There is so much uncertainty about exactly what programs are going to be cut and which ones aren’t.”
President Barack Obama and a bipartisan group of congressional leaders failed to reach an agreement during a meeting on Friday.
Given the sheer size of the cuts — the plan involves slashing $1.2 trillion in federal spending by 2021, including $85 billion this fiscal year — the sequester will undoubtedly have some impact, particularly with respect to cross-border travel and trade.
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said earlier this week that her department would be slashing 5,000 border-patrol agents if the cuts go through, and that would ultimately slow some of the busiest crossings between Canada and the U.S.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection is also preparing to reduce its work hours by the equivalent of 2,750 inspectors as well, meaning cargo inspections at the border could drag on.
That will undoubtedly have an impact on the approximately $1.6 billion worth of goods and 300,000 or so people crossing the U.S.-Canada border each day. (Source: CBC News)
