unity

Thursday May 1, 2025

Canada's Conservative Party grapples with internal divisions, leadership scrutiny, and the challenge of uniting diverse ideological factions.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 1, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

The Conservative Conundrum: Disunity and Factionalism Post-Election

As Canada's election campaign nears its end, Trump's rhetoric and policies become pivotal in shaping voter perceptions of leaders Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney.

April 25, 2025

The recent federal election has laid bare the deep-rooted disunity and factionalism within Canada’s Conservative Party, underscoring a schism that has evolved over decades. As Pierre Poilievre grapples with his electoral defeat and the loss of his Ottawa-area seat, the internal blame game has commenced, revealing persistent tensions within the conservative ranks.

Pierre Poilievre’s decision to remain as leader, despite losing his seat, highlights the complexities of the current situation. His leadership style, which aligns with the populist, Alberta-centred wing of conservatism, contrasts with the Progressive Conservative tradition led by figures like Doug Ford. This ideological rift, dating back to the eras of Preston Manning and Stephen Harper, continues to challenge the party’s cohesion.

News: ‘It’s an unmitigated disaster’: Conservative insiders debate Pierre Poilievre’s future as leader after election defeat

Pierre Poilievre's plan to invoke the notwithstanding clause threatens Canadian democratic norms and sets a dangerous precedent for federal governance.

April 19, 2025

The schism within the Conservative Party has evolved through key historical milestones. During the 1990s, the Reform Party, led by Preston Manning, emphasized Western interests, fiscal conservatism, and skepticism of federal intervention. Stephen Harper later unified the Reform and Progressive Conservative factions to form the modern Conservative Party, but underlying tensions have persisted.

The party has seen recent leadership turnover reflecting these internal divisions. Andrew Scheer, who led the party in the 2019 election, was criticized for being too socially conservative and was subsequently replaced. Erin O’Toole, who moved the party towards the centre, faced rejection in the aftermath of the 2021 election, highlighting the ongoing struggle to find a leadership approach that resonates with the entire conservative base.

April 9, 2025

Poilievre represents the values of the Reform wing, focusing on conservative fiscal policies and provincial autonomy. His allies, such as Danielle Smith and Scott Moe, share these priorities. In contrast, Doug Ford embodies the centrist Progressive Conservative tradition, emphasizing pragmatic governance and coalition-building. Tim Houston of Nova Scotia aligns with this more moderate approach.

The election results have intensified internal blame and criticism. Figures like Jamil Jivani have accused Ford of undermining Poilievre’s campaign, while Ford’s public criticisms of Poilievre’s strategy reflect deeper personal and political tensions. Ford’s strategic decision to distance himself highlights his alignment with more centrist values and his potential ambitions within the broader Conservative movement.

News: MP accuses Doug Ford of ‘sabotaging’ federal election campaign by helping Liberals

Danielle Smith's alignment with Trump complicates Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's campaign as he seeks to distance the party from divisive politics while facing criticism over perceived weaknesses.

March 25, 2025

The schism is further exacerbated by Poilievre’s perceived lack of outreach and collaboration with key political figures, including Ford. This strategic misstep isolated his campaign and limited its appeal beyond its populist base. The absence of a united front, especially in critical regions like Ontario, hindered the party’s electoral success.

The Conservative Party now faces a critical juncture. Addressing internal divisions and fostering unity will be essential for future success. The challenge lies in balancing the priorities of both factions and presenting a cohesive platform that resonates with a national audience.

Doug Ford's evolution from a controversial provincial leader to a national unifier fills a leadership void left not just by Justin Trudeau, but also Pierre Poilievre, as Canada faces economic challenges similar to the COVID-19 pandemic, while dealing with his lingering past controversies.

January 15, 2025

Reconciliation efforts must focus on bridging the gap between the Reform and Progressive Conservative traditions. This involves finding common ground on key issues, fostering dialogue, and embracing a leadership approach that unites rather than divides.

As the Conservative Party stands at a crossroads, the recent election serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by disunity and factionalism. Pierre Poilievre’s leadership, now under scrutiny, embodies the complexities of balancing the party’s diverse ideological factions. His approach and ability to navigate these internal tensions will significantly influence the party’s trajectory.

Ultimately, the Conservative Party’s path forward hinges on its capacity to reconcile internal differences and adapt to the evolving political landscape. As Poilievre’s leadership is evaluated, there is a pressing need for reflection and adaptation to chart a course that ensures future success and stability. The party must seize this moment to unify and present a vision that resonates across the Canadian political spectrum.

Wednesday April 30, 2025

Canada elects Mark Carney to lead a minority government, signaling a rejection of Trump's influence and a commitment to national sovereignty.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 30, 2025 (The Toronto Star)

Canada’s Stand: Mark Carney vs. Trump’s Shadow

As Canada's election campaign nears its end, Trump's rhetoric and policies become pivotal in shaping voter perceptions of leaders Pierre Poilievre and Mark Carney.

April 25, 2025

The recent Canadian federal election has unfolded against a backdrop of unprecedented political dynamics, driven largely by the influence of U.S. President Donald Trump. His aggressive rhetoric, including threats to annex Canada as the 51st state and the imposition of tariffs, became central issues that galvanized Canadian voters. In response, Canadians have made a decisive choice by electing Mark Carney’s Liberal Party to lead the nation, even if through a minority government.

This election result is not merely a rejection of Trump’s influence but also a testament to Canada’s resilience and commitment to its sovereignty. As the Guardian noted, “Trump’s chaotic threats won Mark Carney the Canadian election,” emphasizing how the external pressure from Trump galvanized voters around a leader who promised to stand firm.

Analysis: Trump’s chaotic threats won Mark Carney the Canadian election – but only just

Mark Carney leverages his dual role as Liberal leader and Prime Minister to address economic challenges and political dynamics, including a significant gender gap, in Canada's federal election.

April 12, 2025

Mark Carney, a former central banker, has stepped into the political arena with a wealth of experience in navigating global economic challenges. His leadership during this tumultuous period offers Canadians a sense of stability and competence. In his acceptance speech, Carney struck a combative tone, emphasizing that “President Trump is trying to break us so he can own us. That will never happen.” This clear stance resonates with Canadians’ desire to protect their national interests against external threats.

While the Liberals’ victory was not a sweeping mandate, it reflects a strategic choice by voters to support a leader who promises to defend Canada’s sovereignty. The New York Times highlighted that Carney’s campaign centred around resisting Trump’s menacing comments and tariffs, a message that clearly resonated with the electorate.

However, the minority government situation presents its own set of challenges. Carney will need to navigate a complex political landscape, relying on support from smaller parties to advance his legislative agenda. Yet, Carney’s track record as a central banker, accustomed to dealing with crises, positions him well to manage these challenges effectively.

NYT: Mark Carney’s Liberals Win Canada’s Election. Here Are 4 Takeaways

Paul Chiang's resignation amid controversy over foreign interference comments highlights leadership challenges for Mark Carney and the Liberal Party.

April 2, 2025

Voters’ rejection of Pierre Poilievre’s Conservative Party, which saw its fortunes wane as Trump’s influence grew, further underscores the Canadian electorate’s desire to distance itself from MAGA-style politics. The swift shift in political dynamics reflects a broader sentiment that Canada must define its path on its own terms, independent of external pressures.

As one reader commented, “We elected someone who is an adult and a true leader. And I am relieved and so grateful.” This sentiment captures the optimism many Canadians feel as they look to the future under Carney’s leadership. His plans to diversify Canada’s alliances and reduce reliance on U.S. trade further demonstrate a proactive approach to strengthening the nation’s position on the global stage.

In conclusion, while the path forward will require careful navigation of domestic and international challenges, Canada is well-positioned to face the threats posed by a Trump-led America. Under Mark Carney’s experienced and steady leadership, there is much for Canadians to feel optimistic about as they work towards a future defined by resilience, unity, and self-determination.

 

Wednesday April 23, 2025

Pierre Poilievre sets a 2% GDP defence target by 2030, aligning with Mark Carney's similar commitment to enhance Canada's military spending.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 23, 2025

Canada’s Quiet Resolve in Strengthening Defence Amid Global Uncertainty

Canada must enhance efforts to meet NATO’s 2% defence spending target, reinforcing its obligations and commitments to global security.

March 1, 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of global politics, where alliances are tested and national interests recalibrated, Canada finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Recent events and political shifts have underscored a growing realization among NATO member countries, including Canada, that bolstering military capabilities is not just a response to external pressures, but a strategic necessity for a world where traditional security assurances can no longer be taken for granted.

The backdrop to this realization is a United States led by President Donald Trump, whose rhetoric and actions have raised concerns about America’s commitment to global security frameworks established post-World War II. Trump’s calls for NATO allies to increase defence spending to five percent of GDP, though seemingly about shared burden, mask a deeper unease about the U.S.’s role as a reliable security partner. Trump’s annexation rhetoric concerning Canada and Greenland, while alarming, reflects an unpredictable approach to international relations that has left many allies wary.

News: Trump wants NATO to spend 5% on defence. What do Canada party leaders say?

January 12, 2022

Canada, traditionally seen as a steadfast partner within NATO, has faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s defence spending target of two percent of GDP. Yet, there’s a nuanced understanding emerging among Canadian political leaders. Both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre have now committed to reaching the two percent target by 2030, aligning their strategies to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security in an increasingly unstable world. This alignment signifies a shared recognition of the importance of enhancing military capabilities amidst global uncertainties.

This decision reflects a pragmatic approach to defence policy. Canada recognizes that in a world where the U.S. might retreat from its role as a global security guarantor, it must step up to ensure its own defence readiness. The focus is on modernizing the military, securing the Arctic, and investing in cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing, all while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

News: Mark Carney unveils a plan to Trump-proof Canada

July 12, 2018

Canada’s resolve to meet NATO commitments “on its own terms” is emblematic of a broader trend among NATO members. Many countries are recalibrating their defence policies not just due to external pressures from the U.S., but because of the realization that global threats are multifaceted. The unpredictability of a U.S. administration dismissive of trade and military alliances only adds to the urgency.

In this context, Canada’s approach is both sensible and strategic. It is about strengthening defence capabilities while fostering unity and consensus among political leaders. The decision to bolster military spending is not about succumbing to external demands but about safeguarding national interests in a changing global order.

As Canada moves forward, the focus should remain on maintaining a balanced approach that prioritizes security, economic stability, and diplomatic engagement. By doing so, Canada can navigate the complexities of international relations with resilience and resolve, ensuring its place as a respected and reliable partner on the world stage.

PPs 2% Promise

I’ve been closely following Pierre Poilievre’s approach to Canada’s NATO obligations, and his recent commitment to the 2% GDP defence target by 2030 has caught my attention. Until last week’s debate, Poilievre hadn’t specified a timeline, often critiquing the Liberals’ fluctuating target dates between 2028 and 2034 over the past couple of years without presenting his own. Now, it turns out his target aligns precisely with the Liberals’ plan, even as countries worldwide are exceeding the 2% benchmark.

Interestingly, Poilievre’s decision to announce this commitment late in the campaign suggests strategic timing. It’s likely not a stance that would be met with overwhelming enthusiasm, especially within his own party, where it could be quite polarizing. Let’s face it, bolstering defence—even amid increased threats—isn’t high on the average voter’s priority list, particularly with the cost of living crisis intensifying as Trump ramps up tariffs.

This revelation suggests that Poilievre might not be as hawkish as many believed. His mealy mouthed attitude toward supporting Ukraine’s struggle against Putin tyranny is a chief indicator of this for another day. While he shares Trump’s scepticism towards international agreements and multilateralism, evidenced by his rare mention of the Paris Accord, his reticence on NATO commitments raises questions. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the need to strengthen Canada’s military, including against potential U.S. threats.

Historically, Canada’s Conservative Party has championed robust military and defence policies. Yet, in the era of Donald Trump, who demands a 5% GDP commitment to NATO, one might expect Canadian conservatives to follow suit. Instead, Poilievre’s proposal mirrors the Liberals’, aiming for 2030, which I find both intriguing and somewhat lacking.

While I often see parallels between Canadian conservatives and Trump’s Republicans, this divergence is significant. The traditional hawks within Canada’s Conservative Party appear to have less influence, a point worth noting. When it comes to defence, the differences between Canada’s two major parties offered to voters are strikingly similar.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 23, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

PPs 2% Promise https://youtu.be/7QXYW_dp024

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday April 8, 2025

Amid rising separatist sentiments and tensions in Western Canada, the need for dialogue and compromise is paramount to address regional grievances while promoting national unity.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 8, 2025

A Call for Unity Amidst Division

Danielle Smith's alignment with Trump complicates Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's campaign as he seeks to distance the party from divisive politics while facing criticism over perceived weaknesses.

March 25, 2025

In recent weeks, the political landscape in Canada has been marked by a troubling resurgence of separatist rhetoric emanating from Western Canada, particularly from figures like Preston Manning. His desperate warning that a victory for Mark Carney’s Liberals would lead to the breakup of Canada is not only alarmist but also counterproductive. It threatens to exacerbate divisions at a time when national unity is more critical than ever.

Opinion: Mark Carney poses a threat to national unity

Manning’s perspective, which positions Western separation as a legitimate response to perceived grievances, fails to recognize the complex realities faced by all Canadians. While it is essential to acknowledge the frustrations of those in Alberta and Saskatchewan—regions that have long felt overlooked by federal policies—resorting to threats of secession is not a constructive solution. Such extreme viewpoints only serve to polarize discussions and undermine the collaborative spirit necessary for addressing shared challenges.

December 2, 2022

However, dismissing Manning’s concerns outright ignores a significant truth: the fossil fuel sector in Western Canada is not just an economic powerhouse; it is a lifeline for many communities. The realities of shifting global energy dynamics and the impacts of U.S. President Donald Trump’s reckless economic policies have created uncertainty that can no longer be overlooked. The tariffs and trade tensions he has instigated have put pressure on Canadian industries, particularly those heavily reliant on fossil fuels.

As we navigate these turbulent waters, it is crucial to strike a balance between addressing environmental imperatives and safeguarding the livelihoods of those dependent on fossil fuel industries. The call for an immediate end to fossil fuel reliance without a viable transition plan risks not only economic devastation but also the loss of social cohesion in communities that have built their identities around these sectors.

Opinion: A look at the growing discord in Western Canada

September 1, 2021

Danielle Smith’s alignment with Trump and her provocative stance on Alberta’s autonomy further complicate this already fraught landscape. While she champions the voices of those who feel marginalized, her approach often mirrors the divisive rhetoric that only deepens the chasm between regions. It is essential to understand that unity cannot be built on fear or threats; rather, it requires dialogue, compromise, and a commitment to finding common ground.

What is needed now is a comprehensive and inclusive discussion that brings together various stakeholders—politicians, industry leaders, environmental advocates, and community members—to explore pathways toward a sustainable energy future that respects the economic realities of Western Canada. This means investing in green technology and transition strategies that not only address climate change but also provide new opportunities for workers in the fossil fuel sector.

In the face of daunting challenges posed by external forces, Canada must remain steadfast in its commitment to unity. We cannot allow the desperate warnings of figures like Manning to derail the essential conversations about how to move forward together. Instead, let us focus on building a resilient nation that acknowledges regional concerns while striving for a sustainable and inclusive future.

News: Poilievre distances himself from ex-Reform Leader Preston Manning’s comments on Western separatism

October 12, 2019

The road ahead may be rocky, but by fostering understanding and collaboration, Canada can navigate these rough seas and emerge stronger, united in our diversity and shared purpose. It is time to reject divisive rhetoric and work collectively toward a future that honours both our environmental responsibilities and our economic realities.

Looking For a Strong Manning-Date

As someone who closely follows elections, I’ve always found polls to be incredibly useful in gauging the political climate and predicting election outcomes. Over the past two elections, I’ve made it a point to draw on polls at least once in editorial during each campaign. It’s fascinating to look back and see how the parties were faring just weeks before election day.

During Justin Trudeau’s tenure, the polls often depicted a flatline between the two main parties, leading to somewhat predictable outcomes and the formation of minority governments. This trend seemed to reflect a broader lack of trust and confidence among Canadians towards both the Liberals and Conservatives. Consequently, we’ve experienced years of weak governance, with Trudeau’s position becoming increasingly fragile with each passing election since 2015.

The polls have not been kind to the Liberals under Trudeau in recent years, while the Conservatives, under Pierre Poilievre, have seen astronomical support. However, there’s an old saying about peaking too early, and that seems to be the case for Poilievre. The pendulum of political favour has swung, but rather than benefiting the Conservatives, it appears to have favoured centrists, especially with Mark Carney now leading the Liberal Party.

If there ever was a need for renewed confidence and unity, it is now, especially at a time when global security and economic order are being shaken. A majority government is needed, and the right person to head it is the reasonable, calm, and somewhat boring father figure, Mark Carney. He stands in contrast to Pierre Poilievre, who, with his petulant and angry demeanour, is neither a centrist nor a uniter.

While I sympathize with Conservatives who express frustration with the Liberals, it’s clear that the pendulum has indeed swung toward a more centrist approach. Carney’s leadership offers a new perspective and potential for renewed confidence among Canadians. As we approach the next election, it will be interesting to see how these dynamics play out and what the polls will reveal in the final stretch.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 7, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday March 25, 2025

Danielle Smith's alignment with Trump complicates Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre's campaign as he seeks to distance the party from divisive politics while facing criticism over perceived weaknesses.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday March 25, 2025

Playing the Trump Card: A Conservative Gamble

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's meeting with Donald Trump, highlighted by Kevin O'Leary's theatrical presence and ambitions, underscores the complex dynamics and urgent need for a unified Canadian strategy in light of impending U.S. tariffs.

January 13, 2025

The first week of the 2025 federal election has been anything but smooth for the Conservative Party, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s recent actions and comments have cast an unwelcome spotlight on the party and its leader, Pierre Poilievre. Her controversial request to the Trump administration to pause tariffs until after the Canadian election has not only raised eyebrows but has also thrown a wrench into the Conservatives’ campaign strategy.

News: Danielle Smith tells U.S. podcast she asked Trump administration to pause tariffs to bolster Conservatives

Alberta must balance its oil interests with national unity, aligning with other provinces to strengthen Canada's position against potential U.S. tariffs.

January 17, 2025

Smith’s actions, perceived by many as an invitation for foreign interference in Canadian politics, have drawn widespread criticism. Her alignment with Donald Trump, underscored by her visit to Mar-a-Lago and attendance at Trump’s inauguration, plays the “Trump card,” bending the narrative of her loyalty and fuelling concerns about a lack of commitment to Canadian interests. In a time when unity and a cohesive national strategy are paramount, Smith’s independent approach undermines the collective “Team Canada” stance that both provincial and federal leaders strive to present.

Opinion: Canada, May I Introduce You to Ukraine?

Canada's snap election offers a pivotal opportunity for voters to decide the nation's direction amid economic and geopolitical challenges.

March 21, 2025

Trump’s penchant for describing perceived weakness as not “holding the cards” is particularly relevant here. By aligning with Trump, Smith may inadvertently align with this narrative of vulnerability, casting doubts on her and Poilievre’s ability to lead with strength and independence. This association could paint the Conservatives as lacking the strategic “cards” needed to effectively govern and protect Canadian interests.

For Pierre Poilievre, this association with Trump-like politics is a significant hurdle. As he attempts to broaden his appeal to a diverse electorate, Smith’s comments and actions risk reinforcing a narrative that ties him closely to Trump—a narrative that could alienate moderate and swing voters who are wary of such connections. Poilievre’s reluctance to distance himself from Smith’s remarks only complicates his efforts to rebrand the Conservative Party and distance it from the divisive politics of the past.

Opinion: Danielle Smith’s Trump talk threatens Pierre Poilievre’s chances to win

Pierre Poilievre faces challenges adapting his strategy against the fresh leadership of Mark Carney, as Canada's political dynamics shift from opposition to unity.

March 15, 2025

Liberal Leader Mark Carney has capitalized on this situation, emphasizing the need for a unified government that stands firm for Canada. This contrast between Carney’s vision and the discord within the Conservative ranks could prove pivotal in swaying undecided voters. The controversy surrounding Smith provides the Liberals with a powerful narrative to question the Conservatives’ commitment to Canadian sovereignty and unity.

As the election progresses, the Conservatives face the daunting task of addressing these challenges head-on. Poilievre must navigate the delicate balance of retaining support from his conservative base while reaching out to a broader audience. He needs to clearly articulate his vision for Canada, one that resonates with voters seeking stability and leadership untainted by foreign influence.

Pierre Poilievre's backing of Alberta's controversial transgender policies seems more about playing to social conservatives than considering the potential harm to vulnerable youth.

February 9, 2024

The first week of the 2025 federal election has not gone as planned for the Conservatives. Danielle Smith’s missteps have cast a long shadow, complicating Pierre Poilievre’s path to victory. As the campaign unfolds, the Conservatives must work tirelessly to overcome this narrative and present a united front that truly reflects Canadian values and priorities. Whether they can successfully pivot from this challenging start remains to be seen, but the stakes have never been higher.

A Trump Card Gag

More than a decade has passed since Donald Trump took that infamous elevator ride, launching himself into the arena of politics. In all those years, amidst the countless headlines, debates, and controversies, I’ve managed to avoid the temptation of making a “Trump card” gag—until now. The alignment of Danielle Smith with Trump has created the first major gaffe of the Canadian election campaign, sparking controversy and certainly causing some behind-the-scenes fury between Smith and Pierre Poilievre. Her comments have undoubtedly complicated his efforts to steer the Conservative Party away from divisive politics – as in a reputation. Of being a Timbit Trump leading a Maple MAGA cult. It seems that, whether in politics or wordplay, timing is everything, and this particular moment has finally provided the perfect scenario for this metaphor.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack