USMCA – mackaycartoons

Thursday June 5, 2025

June 5, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday June 5, 2025

Printed in The Toronto Star. Also, Your West Central Voice. Also, The Albuquerque Journal. And, published on Reddit.

A Steel Trap for North America

The recent hike in steel and aluminum tariffs by President Trump has sparked a heated debate, with the move likely to cause significant economic pain on both sides of the Canada-U.S. border. While there’s no denying that steel dumping is a problem that needs addressing, the root of the issue doesn’t lie in Canada. Instead, it’s countries like China and South Korea that have been flooding the markets with cheap steel, creating unfair competition.

Canada has tried to tackle this, imposing tariffs on Chinese steel, but the response has been slow and insufficient. Ottawa must act more decisively to protect its industries and work in concert with the U.S. to address these challenges. However, the way forward should not involve undermining free trade agreements like the USMCA, which have long supported economic cooperation between the two nations.

News: Trump hikes steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%

For Canada, the increased tariffs threaten to cripple industries and lead to job losses, particularly in steel-dependent regions. Meanwhile, American consumers are likely to face higher prices as manufacturers pass on the increased costs. This could have a ripple effect on various sectors, from automotive to construction.

Politically, these tariffs could serve as a means for President Trump to generate revenue to fund tax cuts that largely benefit the wealthy. In this scenario, the rich gain while everyday consumers and workers bear the brunt of the economic fallout.

The solution lies in a collaborative approach that targets the real culprits of steel dumping without resorting to damaging protectionist measures. Both Canada and the U.S. need to engage in meaningful dialogue and develop strategies that uphold fair trade and economic stability for all involved.

Tariff Turmoil Goes on…

Thursday June 5, 2025

Living in Hamilton, Canada’s steel heartland, I’ve seen firsthand how one leader’s motivations can ripple through an industry, affecting countless lives. President Trump’s decision to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports feels like déjà vu for us here. We’ve been through this before, and it’s unsettling to witness such a strategy unfold again.

May 11, 2019

Saturday May 11, 2019 – The above cartoon, originally drawn in 2018, remains as relevant in 2025 as it was then. It captures the enduring nature of trade tensions between the U.S. and China, highlighting the ongoing impact of tariffs and political strategies that continue to affect global economies and everyday consumers. This visual commentary underscores how little the fundamental issues have shifted over the years, despite numerous negotiations and changes in leadership.

The world watches as Trump pursues what many see as an ill-conceived plan, one that history has shown may not lead to the prosperity promised. The notion of ‘making America great again’ seems ironic when the very policies meant to protect could, in fact, harm industries both at home and in allied nations like ours. It’s a stark reminder of how interconnected our economies are and how critical it is to find solutions that uplift rather than undermine. Is this what winning looks like? For those of us in Hamilton, it feels more like a step back than a leap towards any so-called golden age.

Substack is a great platform for me as a cartoonist. I’m mindful of the layoffs hitting many talented people, but I’m keeping a positive outlook. Take a look at the animation of my June 5, 2025, cartoon, and thanks for your support!

Saturday March 22, 2025

March 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday March 22, 2025

The Tesla Turmoil in Canada

October 26, 2024

In recent years, the relationship between the United States and Canada has been strained, largely due to the actions and policies of former President Donald Trump. His approach of using “economic force” has led to unintended and destructive consequences, sparking unrest and acts reminiscent of guerilla warfare.

News: Canadians Turn on Tesla, and It Becomes Physical

The tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum imposed by the Trump administration marked a significant shift away from the cooperative spirit of the USMCA free trade agreement. Hamilton, Ontario, a key player in Canada’s steel industry, has been hit hard by these measures. By ignoring the principles of trust and goodwill in the USMCA, Trump has not only damaged diplomatic ties but also ignited resentment and resistance among Canadians.

January 28, 2025

Adding to the tension, Trump’s comments about Canada becoming the 51st state have stirred unease. Such remarks, whether serious or not, undermine the sovereignty and pride of Canada, a long-standing ally. Coupled with Elon Musk’s alleged statement that “Canada is not a real country,” these actions suggest a troubling disregard for Canada’s independence.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and an advisor to Trump, has become a divisive figure in this narrative. Known for his controversial behaviour, Musk has been given the task of drastically reducing the U.S. federal workforce. His influence extends beyond business, as he uses his social media platform to spread information that some believe interferes with democratic processes. Musk’s rhetoric against Canada, including the alleged remark that “Canada is not a real country,” has only intensified the animosity. For many Canadians, Musk represents a direct threat to their sovereignty and democracy.

January 21, 2025

The backlash against Musk in Canada has been swift and intense. In Hamilton, more than 80 Teslas were vandalized, seen by many as a protest against what they perceive as an attack on their livelihoods. While vandalism is undoubtedly destructive, it reflects a deeper sense of frustration and desperation. When faced with economic force from a hardline president, these acts of defiance become a form of protest for those who feel marginalized and powerless.

News: Tesla under fire: Vanadalism, protests in Hamilton signal tense U.S.-Canada relations

August 28, 2018

The Trump administration’s decision to label these acts as “domestic terrorism” seems inconsistent, especially when compared to the pardons granted to those involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot. Describing violent rioters as “patriots” while condemning Canadian protestors as terrorists highlights a troubling inconsistency in the application of justice.

The events unfolding in Canada serve as a warning about the unintended consequences of using economic force without considering diplomatic integrity and international cooperation. As tensions rise and acts of defiance continue, it is crucial for leaders to reflect on the impact of their policies and rhetoric. True leadership requires not only strength but also empathy and respect for the sovereignty and dignity of all nations.

Resisting Tesla

Some thoughts on the recent spate of vandalism against Teslas, especially since 80 of them were targeted in my own community, grabbing international attention. This is happening amidst some broader political and economic issues. Now, don’t get me wrong—I think the Tesla trucks are quite the eyesore, but generally, I’m a fan of electric cars. Elon’s are called “Cybertrucks,” am I right? The problem is, owning one is just too costly for many of us. So, when I see a Tesla on the road, I can’t help but think its driver is flaunting wealth, much like those who used to drive around in those obnoxious Hummers.

I’m not one to condone vandalism against personal property, but in this case, I find myself understanding the resistance. Here’s why:

Donald Trump launched an economic war against Canada, disregarding the good faith established by the USMCA. By imposing harsh tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, he’s directly targeting Hamilton, the heart of our steel industry.

His comments about wanting Canada to become the 51st state are unsettling, to say the least.

Trump enlisted Elon Musk—yeah, the world’s richest guy, who’s been leaning far right and has a bizarre knack for making Nazi-style salutes—to slash the U.S. federal civil service with mass firings.

The idea that “Canada is not a real country” aligns with Trump’s annexation ambitions.

Musk’s influence, especially through his social media platform, is a genuine threat to Canadian sovereignty. His spread of misinformation and interference in elections is alarming.

The backlash against Musk is rooted in his ties with Trump and the assault on livelihoods, especially in Hamilton. While I can’t support the vandalism itself, I see it as a reaction to Musk’s provocations.

Labeling this as “domestic terrorism” by Trump’s administration is laughable, especially considering the pardons given to those he called “patriots” after the January 6th Capitol attack.

In essence, when a hardline president imposes “economic force,” it’s almost inevitable that guerrilla warfare-like resistance will follow. That’s precisely what’s unfolding now.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday February 4, 2025

February 4, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay – Tuesday February 4, 2025

Free trade with the U.S. is effectively dead

January 28, 2025

The 30-day reprieve that Trump is granting isn’t intended to benefit Canada; rather, it’s a lifeline for bourbon distilleries and potash-dependent states, buying them time to adjust to the harsh reality of Trump tariffs. The future of the auto sector remains uncertain, with Trump and his oligarchs seemingly oblivious to the potential devastation ahead. He needs to fund significant tax cuts for his wealthy supporters, which means imposing higher consumer taxes on Americans. This approach also involves dismantling federal bureaucracy, as Elon Musk has been tasked with finding “efficiencies” that could wipe out countless livelihoods—all to make America “great” for those demanding tax cuts. Meanwhile, Trump and his allies continue to tout their notion of “winning.”

Regarding tariffs, Trump will persist in using threats as a bargaining tool, falsely claiming that foreign countries bear the cost, rather than U.S. importers and consumers. He claims to care about lives destroyed by the fentanyl crisis – sure- believe that lie, as much as he claims the problem is due to it coming in from Canada. Soon, he’ll demand that Canada relax its banking regulations, then turn his attention to Canadian water resources. Ultimately, quips for Canada to cede its sovereignty and become the 51st state goes from delusion to conquest.

June 30, 2021

What Trump has inadvertently done is unite a nation. Canada’s patriotism, which had waned over the years, has revived. We recognize that we can no longer afford to be complacent; we must stand strong against this playground bully. We are building our own defences.

Canadians are rallying together to support local businesses, explore the beauty of our country, urge politicians to eliminate domestic trade barriers, foster connections with friendly partners, and promote unity within our communities.

Sadly, it took a bully from a foreign land to motivate us to take these steps. The reality is that the relationship between the U.S. and Canada is diverging, a trend that may soon resonate globally as America risks isolating itself, joining the ranks of hermit kingdoms like North Korea.

As for tariffs, it seems Lil’ Donald never grasped the moral of the famous fable. Originally published on Friday June 1, 2018.

Friday November 15, 2024

November 15, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday November 15, 2024

Doug Ford’s Trump Imitation Is a Risky Gamble

April 14, 2018

Doug Ford is making a bold but dangerous bet. By accusing Mexico of acting as a “backdoor” for cheap Chinese goods and floating the idea of booting it from the USMCA, the Ontario Premier has aligned himself with Donald Trump’s protectionist rhetoric. The move is as strategic as it is risky—Ford clearly hopes to avoid Ontario becoming collateral damage in Trump’s sweeping tariff policies. Yet in doing so, he risks undermining key trade relationships, alienating allies, and leaving Ontario’s economy at the mercy of an unpredictable U.S. president.

The timing of Ford’s comments is no coincidence. Just days after Trump’s historic election victory, Ford’s rhetoric mirrors the talking points Trump hammered home on the campaign trail. Trump’s grievances with Mexico—ranging from trade to border security—are well-documented, and Ford’s remarks seem calibrated to place Ontario in the incoming administration’s good graces. By parroting Trump’s complaint that Mexico is facilitating China’s infiltration of North American markets, Ford appears to be playing the long game, angling for Ontario to benefit from any renegotiation of the USMCA in 2026.

June 29, 2016

However, this calculated mimicry comes with significant risks. Mexico is Canada’s fifth-largest trade partner, and Ford’s aggressive stance could jeopardize the stability of this relationship. As Kenneth Smith Ramos, Mexico’s chief negotiator for the USMCA, has pointed out, Canada has mechanisms within the trade agreement to address concerns about unfair practices. Yet Ottawa has not taken such steps, suggesting Ford’s rhetoric is more about political posturing than substance. By undermining Mexico, Ford risks alienating a key ally and disrupting supply chains that are critical to Ontario’s auto industry.

Opinion: Doug Ford’s diplomatic foray has all the tact of a wrecking ball

December 8, 2020

Ford’s approach also overlooks the complex realities of trade and industry. While he focuses on cheap Chinese imports, he ignores the deeper challenges facing Ontario’s manufacturing sector, including automation and the lack of domestic innovation. As David Moscrop noted in the National Observer, the global push for cheaper goods and faster production has already led to job losses, and protectionism alone will not shield Ontario workers from these trends. Ford’s comments may appeal to those anxious about job security, but they offer little in the way of meaningful solutions.

Moreover, Ford’s Trumpian rhetoric could backfire spectacularly. Trump’s protectionist worldview treats trade as a zero-sum game, and his administration has been known to turn on allies. Ford’s overtures to Trump might shield Ontario in the short term, but they offer no guarantees. Trump’s promise of across-the-board tariffs of up to 20 percent would be disastrous for Canada, and Ford’s antagonistic stance toward Mexico could leave Ontario more isolated, not less.

News: Ontario Premier calls Mexico a ‘backdoor’ for cheap Chinese imports

November 18, 2021

Even within Canada, Ford’s comments have raised eyebrows. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has taken a more cautious approach, emphasizing collaboration with both the U.S. and Mexico to address trade concerns. While Trudeau has not directly criticized Ford, his government’s silence suggests a lack of enthusiasm for the Premier’s inflammatory remarks. Critics have also questioned whether Ford’s focus on international trade distracts from pressing domestic issues, such as housing and healthcare.

Ford’s strategy might make sense as a short-term political maneuver, but it is a risky gamble for Ontario’s economy. Mexico has been a cooperative partner under the USMCA, and Ford’s combative rhetoric risks upsetting the balance of the agreement. His Trump-like bluster may win him points with certain voters, but it offers little in the way of practical solutions for the challenges facing Ontario’s industries.

Ultimately, Ford’s decision to mimic Trump could leave Ontario exposed to economic instability and at the mercy of an unpredictable ally. Instead of thoughtful diplomacy, Ford has chosen the path of bombast and brinkmanship. It’s a risky move that could do more harm than good—not just for Ontario, but for Canada’s place in the North American trade partnership. If Ford truly wants to protect Ontario’s workers and industries, he must find a way to navigate the complexities of trade with caution and diplomacy, not reckless imitation.

Friday November 8, 2024

November 8, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday November 8, 2024

Chrystia Freeland’s Assurance on Canada-U.S. Relations Rings Hollow Amid Trump’s Second Term

November 12, 2016

Canada will be “absolutely fine” under a Trump presidency, according to Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland. But with a federal election likely looming and Donald Trump’s familiar, no-holds-barred approach to trade, defence, and immigration back in the White House, this reassurance from Freeland seems more wishful thinking than grounded in reality.

August 28, 2018

Certainly, experience matters. Freeland, who was foreign affairs minister during the last round of NAFTA negotiations, has a track record of navigating turbulent waters with the Trump administration. However, the notion that Canada is prepared for what’s coming lacks specifics. If the 2016 election taught Canada anything, it’s that Trump’s promises to “get tough” on trade and protect “American jobs” are more than rhetoric. Trump has now proposed a 10% tariff on all imports, a move the Canadian Chamber of Commerce warns could cut Canadians’ real income by 1.5%, alongside productivity losses on both sides of the border. And yet, Freeland offers few details about her government’s “plan” to defend Canada’s national interest beyond vague commitments to “keep talking” with former Trump officials like Robert Lighthizer.

Video: ‘Canada will be absolutely fine,’ says Freeland following Trump U.S. election win

October 20, 2016

While Freeland points to Canada’s robust economic ties with the U.S. as “leverage,” this optimistic view underestimates Trump’s protectionist mindset. Yes, nearly $3.6 billion in trade crosses the Canada-U.S. border daily, but Trump’s “America First” policies historically prioritize American industries, not bilateral partnerships. If there’s one lesson from Trump’s first term, it’s that he doesn’t hesitate to use tariffs as a blunt instrument, even against close allies. Canada’s critical manufacturing, steel, and aluminum industries were hit with tariffs in 2018, and a fresh round of import restrictions could be catastrophic.

News: A decade on, the ‘This is fine’ creator wants to put the famous dog to rest

January 11, 2016

Beyond trade, the Deputy Prime Minister’s optimism seems unfounded on the immigration front. Trump’s renewed promises of mass deportations of undocumented immigrants will likely lead to a surge of asylum-seekers heading north. Canada’s border agencies are under-resourced for such an influx, and recent pressures on immigration and refugee systems indicate that handling a potential spike could overwhelm Canada’s ability to process claims. Freeland’s remarks sidestepped this, despite its likely impact on Canadian cities, social services, and resources.

July 12, 2018

Then there’s the potential impact on defence and foreign policy. Trump’s insistence that NATO allies, including Canada, “pay their fair share” could reignite tensions within the alliance. With the U.S. pouring billions into defence, Trump has historically expected Canada to increase its contributions. A major defence expenditure would strain Canada’s budget, especially with high inflation and deficits already stretching public resources. Freeland’s assurances may sound good on paper, but funding an increase in military spending without cutting essential services is a tall order, and Canadians should question whether this is a realistic path forward.

News: We have a plan’ for Trump’s second presidency, Chrystia Freeland says

April 22, 2024

The timing of Freeland’s comments raises even more questions. With a federal election expected within the year, and polls favouring a Conservative government, her reassurances could be more about optics than actionable policy. Pierre Poilievre, the Conservative leader, has yet to articulate a clear approach to dealing with Trump’s “America First” policies, and Canadians don’t yet know if a Poilievre government would chart a collaborative or confrontational course. As voters head to the polls, they deserve a choice: a clear stance from both parties on how each would approach the challenge of a volatile American partner. Freeland’s plan is on the table, but it’s crucial for the Conservatives to offer their own vision, ensuring Canadians have a democratic choice on the future of Canada-U.S. relations.

November 17, 2016

As it stands, Canadians are left with more questions than answers. Freeland’s “plan” lacks the specifics needed to reassure the public. Canada should be taking proactive measures now—strengthening trade alliances outside the U.S., investing in border security, and preparing resources for a potential refugee surge. Without clear, decisive actions from either side of the political aisle, Freeland’s assurances feel hollow, and Canadians have every right to feel concerned about what lies ahead under Trump’s second term.

In case you’re scratching your head over the reference in my latest cartoon, I’ve borrowed from KC Green’s classic webcomic meme, “This is fine.” You’ve probably seen it— a cartoon dog sits with a smile, coffee in hand, as the room blazes around him. This image has become a shorthand for coping with disaster, or at least pretending to. Given Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s recent assurances that we have little to worry about with Trump’s return to power, I found this to be a fitting way to convey the gap between reassuring words and the high-stakes reality at our doorstep.

Green created “This is fine” back in 2013 as part of his Gunshow series, and it quickly went viral for its humour and relatability. The dog, later named Question Hound, became a symbol for anyone quietly facing chaos, making it one of the most enduring internet memes of the past decade. Green has mentioned that the comic was a way to channel his own mental health struggles at the time, and while it’s taken on a life of its own, he’s embraced how others relate to it.

As someone who’s had my own work recycled and repurposed—my “4 Waves”cartoon, for example—I get the complications of seeing your creation take on new lives and meanings. So, in the tradition of tipping my hat to the original creators I draw from, I’ve credited Green with “apologies to KC Green” at the bottom of my piece. This is the first time I’ve done a parody of his work, but as with my previous adaptations of classic art like Gillray’s “Plumb-pudding in Danger,” it’s a nod to a timeless image that speaks volumes. In this case, it’s about capturing the surreal feeling of being told, “We’re fine,” while the flames say otherwise. (Sound up for the animated version)

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

(Post Cartoon) Opinion: Justin Trudeau is already getting it wrong on Trump