voters – mackaycartoons

Thursday May 29 2025

May 29, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday May 29 2025

Published also in The Toronto Star, and on Reddit.

Ford’s Fast Track: Mining Progress or Consultation Overlook?

October 22, 2022

Back in 2019, Premier Doug Ford’s government tried to push through Bill 66, which threatened the Greenbelt and ignored environmental protections. Public outrage forced them to backtrack. Fast forward to 2025, and it seems the government hasn’t learned its lesson with Bill 5.

Bill 5 aims to speed up mining in the Ring of Fire region by creating “special economic zones.” This move is supposed to boost the economy, but it has angered Indigenous leaders and the public. Critics argue it’s like a repeat of Bill 66, ignoring the need for proper consultation with those affected.

News: Doug Ford government amends controversial mining bill to allay First Nation concerns

January 24, 2025

To Ford’s credit, he has skillfully tackled the challenges posed by the Trump administration’s trade actions, which threatens Ontario’s manufacturing base. By focusing on developing the mining of critical minerals, he has aligned with voter support for economic resilience and growth. However, what’s lost in this expectation granted by citizens is the crucial need for proper consultation with Indigenous communities.

Despite offering amendments to allow Indigenous-led economic zones, the government’s promise to consult with First Nations after the fact seems insincere. Indigenous communities should be involved from the start, not as an afterthought.

News: Doug Ford offers amendment to First Nations on mining bill but vows to speed development through ‘economic zones’

December 11, 2018

Reader comments highlight the need for genuine engagement and respect for Indigenous rights. The government’s approach of rushing development without proper input feels like a misstep, echoing past mistakes.

Consultation isn’t just a formality; it’s essential for fair and democratic decision-making. By not learning from the past, the Ford government risks repeating history with Bill 5. It’s time for a more inclusive approach that values the input of all Ontarians and respects the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Only then can we ensure a future that’s fair and sustainable for everyone.

A Test for Doug – Editorial Cartoon for Thursday May 29, 2025

Posted to Substack

After all these years since Canada kicked off its reconciliation efforts with Indigenous Peoples, you’d think we’d have the basics down by now. One of the most fundamental practices is meaningful consultation, especially when it comes to economic development that impacts our environment—whether it’s the sea, air, or land. And when it comes to something like mining, this should be a no-brainer.

December 11, 2018 – Environmentalists and critics accused Premier Doug Ford of breaking his promise to protect the Greenbelt, claiming that the changes introduced in Bill 66 undermined environmental protections and opened the area to development.

Yet, here comes Doug Ford, ready to defy common sense and try to limit consultation once again. This isn’t the first time he’s taken this approach, and it seems like another case of lessons not learned. It’s as if he’s trying to sneak this by, testing the waters to see how far he can push things.

Considering that less than half of Ontario’s voters bothered to cast a ballot, it might seem like Ford reads the 55% who didn’t vote as a kind of silent approval. But relying on voter apathy or disengagement is risky business. Silence doesn’t equal consent, especially when it comes to respecting the rights and voices of Indigenous communities.

Tuesday November 28, 2023 – The Ontario Liberal Party is set to announce its new leader, facing the challenge of overcoming voter apathy and past election setbacks to compete against Doug Ford in future elections.

In today’s animated editorial cartoon, which Substack subscribers get to preview before it hits the Hamilton Spectator, I’m being upfront about a new technique I’ve started using: AI for adding voice to the characters.

According to YouTube’s policy, it’s essential to disclose when content is altered or synthetic, especially if it seems real. This includes realistic sounds or visuals created with AI. With today’s technology, the line between real and fake is increasingly blurred, and AI-generated voices are impressively accurate.

One of my critiques of animated satire has always been the voiceovers for political figures. While some might be as skilled as David Levine at caricaturing, they often fall short of Rich Little when it comes to voice impressions. Now, with AI, replicating political voices is not only easy but also a bit unsettling.

In the animated clip below, I’ve used software to mimic the voice of Doug Ford. I believe it’s clear that it’s not really him, but for those who might be too convinced, there’s a disclaimer in place.

This is uncharted territory, and I’d love to hear your thoughts. If you have any feedback or want to start a conversation, now’s your chance.

Substack is an invaluable platform for me, especially given the uncertainties that come with being a staff editorial cartoonist. While I remain optimistic about my future, I am acutely aware of the unfortunate layoffs and newspaper closures that have impacted many talented colleagues in our field. Please Enjoy the animated making of my May 29, 2025 editorial cartoon below and thank you for your continued support!

Friday April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, Unpublished – Friday April 18, 2025

A Disservice to Canadian Voters

April 19, 2025

In the throes of an election cycle, Canadian voters find themselves navigating a landscape devoid of fully costed party platforms. As advanced polls open, the absence of detailed fiscal plans from major political players like the Liberals and Conservatives is not just a minor oversight; it’s a reckless disregard for the electorate’s right to informed decision-making.

Party platforms serve as a blueprint for governance, offering insight into priorities and fiscal strategies. They are essential for holding future governments accountable. Yet, here we are, mere weeks from casting ballots, and the fiscal blueprints remain elusive. The Conservatives have pledged to collaborate with the Parliamentary Budget Officer, while the Liberals promise a release before the advanced polls close. However, these assurances come too late in the game, leaving voters with little time to digest and debate the implications of proposed policies.

Opinion: Where are the Costed Party Platforms? The Clock is Ticking

The recklessness of this approach is underscored by the current economic climate. With Canada facing a third major economic shock in less than two decades—following the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 pandemic, and now the 2025 US trade conflict—the need for transparent and credible fiscal planning is paramount. Proposals to cut taxes or increase spending should be weighed against the backdrop of economic uncertainty and potential deficits. The lack of detailed platforms raises questions about how these promises will be funded and whether they are fiscally responsible.

Despite this, the reality may be that the absence of costed platforms doesn’t significantly sway most voters. In an age where political campaigns often resemble theatrical performances, filled with grand promises and vague assurances, the specifics of fiscal policy may take a backseat to broader ideological alignments and emotional appeals. Many voters prioritize immediate concerns over long-term fiscal sustainability, trusting party rhetoric over detailed economic assessments.

Opinion: The hidden costs of Liberal and Conservative election promises

However, this complacency is a gamble. Without clear plans, voters are left to speculate on the sincerity and feasibility of campaign promises. It allows parties to make grandiose claims without accountability for their financial implications, potentially leading to governance that prioritizes short-term gains over sustainable economic health.

While the absence of costed platforms may not deter most voters, it represents a significant dereliction of political responsibility. It denies Canadians the opportunity to engage in meaningful debate about the future direction of the country. As citizens, we must demand more from our political leaders, insisting on transparency and accountability in their fiscal promises. The stakes are too high to accept anything less.

Saturday April 12, 2025

April 12, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 12, 2025 (also, The Toronto Star, April 14, 2025)

A Financial Superstar at the Right Time and Place in Canada’s Election

April 2, 2025

As Canada’s federal election progresses, Liberal leader Mark Carney emerges as a financial superstar whose impressive credentials position him as the leader Canada needs during these uncertain times. With a career that includes serving as the Governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, Carney brings unparalleled economic expertise to a campaign dominated by concerns over international trade tensions and a rapidly evolving global economy.

Carney’s ability to navigate complex economic landscapes has made him a reassuring figure for Canadians anxious about the volatility stemming from Donald Trump’s trade tariffs and broader economic shifts. His leadership is synonymous with stability and competence, qualities that resonate deeply with voters seeking assurance in turbulent times.

Opinion: Carney’s Telling Jokes: Ford, Smith, and the Federal Race

March 21, 2025

Carney’s dual role as both the Liberal leader and Prime Minister provides a unique advantage during the campaign. He has adeptly worn both hats, using the campaign period to work the hustings as a party leader while strategically stepping back into his role as Prime Minister. This dual approach allows him to maintain a presence on the ground, engaging with voters, while also returning to Ottawa for essential meetings with Premiers, strategizing governance, and addressing the latest antics from a hostile and unpredictable Trump administration. Some of these actions are necessary for governance, while others are performative, showcasing to voters a Prime Minister who is deftly and steadily manning the tiller.

Opinion: Women have a problem with Pierre Poilievre. Men have a problem with Liberals

March 20, 2025

Yet, as the election unfolds, Carney faces the challenge of addressing domestic issues like rising living costs, housing shortages, and regional disparities—issues that may require difficult decisions and potentially unpopular austerity measures post-election.

Furthermore, Carney must contend with a gender gap that is shaping the election’s dynamics. The recent analysis by Allan Gregg highlights a significant divide, with middle-aged men, often seen as “alpha males,” showing strong support for Pierre Poilievre and the Conservatives. These men, typically drawn to assertive political figures, present a hurdle for Carney, who must find ways to appeal to this demographic without alienating his broader base.

The next 20 days are critical for Carney to sustain the level of confidence voters have placed in him. The campaign trail is fraught with potential pitfalls, including media critiques about his dual role as Liberal leader and Prime Minister, the threat of dirty campaigning by adversaries, and the pervasive influence of misinformation on social media.

Moreover, Carney faces the test of upcoming debates, where his political acumen will be on display against seasoned opponents. These debates offer a platform for Carney to articulate a clear vision for Canada’s future, demonstrating his ability to translate his financial expertise into effective political leadership.

opinion: Mark Carney should take more care with the caretaker convention

March 14, 2025

Carney’s task is to reassure Canadians that his leadership extends beyond economic theory to encompass the everyday challenges they face. He must balance the immediate need for economic stability with a long-term vision for addressing domestic issues, proving that he is not only the leader for today’s crises but also for the challenges of tomorrow.

As the election continues, the question remains: Can Mark Carney leverage his financial superstar status and dual roles to build a comprehensive platform that resonates with Canadians across all walks of life? The answer will determine whether he can secure a mandate to lead Canada through its current challenges and into a stable future.

Midway Mark Carney

While conspiracy theories aren’t exclusive to any one political group, it’s hard to ignore how often they seem to emerge from the right, particularly among some Conservative circles. These theories often stand in stark contrast to well-established scientific facts. Whether it’s questioning the effectiveness of vaccines, which have saved countless lives, or denying the overwhelming evidence of climate change, the impact of such misinformation is troubling. We see the consequences in increasingly severe weather patterns, from storms to wildfires.

This week, a new form of skepticism emerged among Conservative supporters of Pierre Poilievre, who began questioning the validity of polls that consistently show the Liberals leading by several points. In particular, Mark Carney holds a substantial lead over Poilievre. The CBC’s aggregated poll data, updated daily, presents a clear picture of voter preferences, and it’s not rocket science to understand the trends.

Such disregard for factual data echoes the sentiments expressed by Trump in the U.S., where claims of a “rigged” system only surface when the results are unfavourable. This rhetoric now seems to be influencing Poilievre’s movement, drawing parallels to a “flat earth” mindset that denies the reality of polls and, by extension, questions the integrity of the electoral process itself. It’s quite telling when a political leader resorts to emphasizing crowd sizes as a definitive measure of success. Yet Canadians keep being told by Conservatives that there is no alignment to the Trump form of conservatism.

Midway Mark Carney | April 12, 2025:https://youtu.be/-ygxpymPGZ8

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday February 28, 2025

February 28, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday February 28, 2025

Published in the Toronto Star.

Ford’s Early Gamble Pays Off: Ontario’s Vote Against Trump Turmoil

Young Doug Ford: The Series

Doug Ford’s quest to seek a strong mandate from Ontario voters, a full 18 months before the set election date, can be seen as a strategic move deeply entwined with the tumultuous political climate influenced by former U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump’s rhetoric, often perceived as unpredictable and controversial, has not only riled up Canadians but also provided Ford with an opportunity to consolidate his political strength in Ontario.

In calling an early election, Ford positioned himself as a leader ready to protect Ontario’s economy from the looming threats of U.S. tariffs. By framing the election around the need for a robust mandate to confront these challenges, Ford managed to shift the narrative from domestic controversies to international economic concerns. His campaign emphasized his visits to Washington, where he sought to lobby U.S. lawmakers and defend Ontario’s interests, a move that resonated with voters wary of Trump’s trade policies.

News: Doug Ford on track to get that bigger mandate

January 23, 2006

This strategic pivot allowed Ford to capitalize on the anxiety surrounding international trade and align himself with Ontarians’ desire for stability and economic security. The narrative of standing up against external threats created a unifying theme for his campaign, overshadowing some of the criticisms related to his governance, such as issues with healthcare, housing, and environmental policies.

Polls leading up to election day indicated that Ford’s gamble was paying off. A significant lead over his rivals suggested that his message resonated with a broad spectrum of voters. The Progressive Conservatives appeared poised to secure a third consecutive majority government, an achievement that would place Ford in rare company in Ontario’s political history.

The polls revealed not just a lead in popular support but also a strategic advantage across various demographics and regions. Ford’s ability to appeal to both traditional conservative bases and swing voters concerned about economic stability gave him a comprehensive edge. The data suggested that despite underlying dissatisfaction with some provincial directions, many voters still saw Ford as the best option to navigate the uncertain global economic landscape.

News: Ontario heads to polls for snap election in face of looming Trump tariffs

February 19, 2025

In contrast, Ford’s opponents, while focusing on crucial domestic issues like healthcare and housing, struggled to gain the same level of traction. The Liberals and New Democrats faced the challenge of presenting a compelling alternative narrative in a climate dominated by concerns over U.S.-Canada relations.

As Ontario voters headed to the polls, it became clear that Ford’s early election call, although risky, was a calculated move that leveraged international dynamics to reinforce his leadership. By deftly capitalizing on Trump’s rhetoric and the subsequent economic concerns, Ford positioned himself not just as a provincial leader but as a key player in navigating Ontario through the complexities of global politics.

Doug Ford’s quest for a strong mandate, framed around the issue of Donald Trump, underscored his strategic acumen in aligning provincial politics with broader geopolitical concerns. The polls pointed to a likely victory, affirming that Ford’s approach resonated with voters seeking stability and decisive leadership in uncertain times. As the election unfolded, it was evident that Ford’s gamble on early elections and his focus on economic defence had solidified his path to securing the strong mandate he sought.

Subscription Membership Has its Privileges (My morning after the election cartoon only you and a few get to see before everyone else)

Creating editorial cartoons during an election is a dance with uncertainty, where the risk of choosing the right narrative before the results roll in is both thrilling and daunting. In the past, I’d sketch out multiple scenarios, each capturing different outcomes for Ontario’s political landscape: a PC majority, a surprise NDP surge, or a Liberal comeback. But with deadlines closing in before the polls, the luxury of waiting for results has vanished.

The “Young Doug Ford” series is my playful take on these times, where satire meets the unpredictable nature of politics. This particular piece, featuring a youthful Donald Trump in oversized fur, surrounded by Doug Ford and his buddies with their humourous “mandates,” was a gamble. My editor’s nervousness was palpable—what if the election didn’t align with the cartoon’s narrative? But that’s the beauty and risk of editorial cartooning: capturing the spirit of the moment, even if the specifics remain uncertain.

Gone are the days of newsroom hustle after polls close. The immediacy of digital deadlines has replaced the tactile adjustments of ink and paper. Editorial board meetings with party leaders and meet-and-greets with candidates that once enriched our perspectives are fading memories. Today, many candidates dodge public forums and media questions, a trend that mirrors the disconnection felt by voters. This disengagement challenges cartoonists to find fresh ways to connect with audiences, using humour and creativity to spark conversation in an era of political fatigue.

In this shifting landscape, the creative process remains an anchor. It’s about interpreting the zeitgeist, taking risks, and sometimes, embracing the uncertainty. Even as the times change, the mission of editorial cartoons—to provoke thought, entertain, and challenge the status quo—remains steadfast, a testament to the enduring power of satire in political discourse.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 28, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday February 26, 2025

February 26, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

February 26, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday February 26, 2025

Tariffs and Tumbles: Ford’s Housing Crisis Unresolved

October 18, 2024

As Ontarians get ready to vote, the housing crisis remains a major issue that Premier Doug Ford’s government hasn’t properly tackled. Instead of focusing on affordable housing solutions, Ford has turned attention to upcoming tariffs from the Trump administration, which are likely to raise the costs of building materials. This distraction comes at a time when many can’t afford homes and homelessness is increasing.

News: How Ontario’s housing crisis got so bad

September 27, 2024

Ford’s decision to call an election 18 months early was partly based on these tariffs, yet his government hasn’t offered a clear plan to deal with the resulting cost hikes. Critics note that spending on affordable housing and homelessness has barely changed over the past decade. Meanwhile, homelessness has jumped by 25% since 2022, affecting 81,000 people in 2024. The government’s response has been weak, focusing on clearing homeless encampments instead of finding long-term solutions.

Since Ford took office, the average home price in Ontario has shot up by 42%, exceeding national rates. Housing construction is lagging, and the goal of building 1.5 million homes by 2031 seems far off, with a shortfall of 740,000 units. Ford’s approach has been more reactive than proactive, failing to tackle the root causes of the crisis. The reluctance to support family-friendly housing and co-op models, along with zoning and bureaucratic delays, has hindered progress. Even the Housing Affordability Task Force’s recommendations have largely been ignored.

Opinion: Doug Ford is failing to deliver on housing. Here’s what needs to change after Thursday’s election

August 21, 2024

Despite these challenges, voters seem ready to give Ford another majority. This is puzzling, given that the opposition parties have proposed more robust plans. The NDP and Greens want to increase housing density and legalize four-plexes, while the Liberals aim to lower homeownership costs by reducing development charges.

Ford’s lack of a clear strategy amid upcoming tariffs and his poor handling of the housing crisis are missed opportunities to build trust and secure Ontario’s future. Housing is not just an economic issue; it’s about providing everyone with a decent place to live. As Ontarians vote, they should demand leadership that addresses housing affordability with real solutions, not just talk. The province’s future depends on it.

It’s frustrating to watch a government that has utterly mishandled the housing issue in Ontario escape proper scrutiny in a sneaky snap election campaign. The evidence is all around us: from the rising number of encampments to the staggering statistics that show a lack of affordable housing options, it’s clear that the Ford government has failed to address this critical issue. Rental prices have skyrocketed, and homelessness continues to grow, reflecting a dire need for immediate action.

While there are other elements at play, like the aftermath of the pandemic and federal immigration policies adding pressure, the Ford government’s focus on Trump tariffs during the election seems misplaced. They’ve dropped the ball, particularly with the Greenbelt fiasco and the absence of a viable alternative plan. It’s evident that any hope for a well-thought-out strategy for what’s to come has been squandered.

How they’re still leading so far ahead in the polls is beyond me. With the election nearly here, it’s disheartening to see leadership that prioritizes distractions over solid action on housing issues. Many are left wondering if they’ve seen enough real action or just a lot of hot air. My job isn’t to suggest a better party to vote for, but to point out the weaknesses of a party given its record—and this government has performed poorly. This is my final opportunity to vent before Ontario heads to the polls on Thursday. If you’re aware of current events, be sure to vote — apathy may lead to the worst outcome, and what a shame that would be.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 26, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack