The declaration of “America is back” by President Donald Trump rings through the halls of power with a resonance that’s both reassuring to some and disconcerting to others. But as we delve deeper into his policies and the current state of the nation, a pressing question arises: Back to what, precisely? The rhetoric suggests a return to greatness, yet the reality paints a picture that seems to harken back to an era less democratic and more autocratic.
Trump’s imposition of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China has been described by The Economist as an unexpected upheaval, causing a ripple of economic isolationism reminiscent of the protectionist policies of the late 19th century. Readers of The Globe and Mail express concern that these actions dismantle decades of progress toward free trade that the U.S. once championed. The United States, a founding figure in reducing global trade barriers through agreements like GATT and the WTO, now appears to be retreating to a time when tariffs were the norm rather than the exception.
The editorial from The Globe and Mail paints a picture of a U.S. pivoting away from its Western allies towards the arms of the Kremlin. This shift raises questions about America’s role as a reliable ally in the post-war era, a period when it provided security and leadership against totalitarianism. Reader comments reflect unease over the abandonment of long-held security guarantees and the potential fallout for global stability. The U.S. seems to be distancing itself from the very alliances it helped to build, suggesting a return to an era of isolationism and unilateralism.
Domestically, Trump’s administration is characterized by significant upheaval, with an unelected billionaire like Elon Musk reportedly wielding power to fire civil servants. The concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals and the erosion of institutional norms evoke a time before the robust checks and balances established by the founding fathers. Reader comments express fears of a permanent alteration in governance, with democracy itself appearing to be under threat.
February 4, 2025
Trump’s rhetoric of annexing territories and embracing former adversaries echoes imperial expansionism. The notion of America “being back” might conjure images of a time when nations were led by divine kings, wielding unchecked power and pursuing imperial ambitions. This raises the question of whether Trump’s vision aligns with the democratic ideals and international cooperation that have long defined American leadership.
As Trump declares “America is back,” the question remains: Back to what historical period does he refer? Is it a return to economic isolationism, diplomatic withdrawal, and centralized power reminiscent of monarchies? For a nation that once stood as a beacon of democracy and global leadership, the current trajectory seems at odds with the principles that have guided it for over two centuries.
February 6, 2019
In this context, the call for vigilance and reflection becomes imperative. Understanding what “America is back” truly means is crucial for the nation and the world, as the implications of this rhetoric reverberate across borders and generations. The path forward must reconcile the nation’s historical ideals with the challenges and complexities of the modern world.
America is back (To c1534)
Just wrapped up another day at the drawing board, capturing the political scene. If you know my work, you’ll recall my detailed chart of English and British monarchs. In the Trump 2.0 era, though he’s been in power just six weeks, I’ve already illustrated him in royal attire a few times.
U.S. history has seen presidents compared to overbearing kings when they veer from the essence of a presidency, rooted in the republic’s founding ideals. Yet here we are with Donald Trump, the “anti-President,” echoing the Vatican’s anti-popes and Oliver Cromwell’s flirtation with kingship. Trump, who seems to relish the company of monarchs and dictators, has expressed his kingly aspirations openly.
What’s more, his followers are urging him to break term limits and push for a third term, a notion that challenges the legitimacy of democratic elections. It’s as if Trump and his circle of enablers have forgotten that a U.S. President isn’t meant to play king. With MAGA’s fealty and his grand rhetoric about territories, when Trump says “America is Back,” it feels like a nod to Tudor times
Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 6, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!
The Looming Shadow of Trump’s so called Golden Age
November 7, 2024
As the United States prepares to usher in Donald Trump’s second term, there are bold promises of a new golden age—one that promises unprecedented happiness and prosperity for the privileged few while casting deep shadows of misery over the masses. For Canada and the broader world, the implications of this era are both profound and unsettling.
One of the most immediate and troubling aspects of Trump’s agenda is the promise of mass deportations of undocumented migrants within the United States. This policy not only threatens the lives and livelihoods of millions but also stands as a stark reminder of the administration’s willingness to prioritize exclusion over empathy. For Canadians, known for our commitment to inclusivity and humanitarian values, these actions represent a departure from the principles that bind our two nations in friendship and cooperation.
Trump’s promise to impose a 25% tariff on imports, including those from key trade partners like Canada, poses a significant threat to our economic stability. The interconnectedness of our economies means that such tariffs could lead to job losses and economic disruptions on both sides of the border. For Canadians, who have long enjoyed a robust trading relationship with the United States, this policy threatens not only economic prosperity but also the spirit of collaboration that has defined our bilateral relations.
The potential for Trump to push Ukraine into concessions with Russia raises alarms about global stability and justice. As Canadians, we have long stood for peace and the defence of sovereign nations against aggression. Any move that undermines Ukraine’s sovereignty could set a dangerous precedent, emboldening authoritarian regimes while compromising the democratic ideals we hold dear.
October 26, 2024
Perhaps most concerning is the broader societal impact of Trump’s policies, which seem to deepen the divide between a burgeoning oligarchy and the rest of society. At the centre of this oligarchic circle is Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, who has found a prominent role in Trump’s orbit. Musk’s influence, alongside other billionaires like Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and the Murdoch family, epitomizes the concentration of wealth and power that threatens democratic ideals. These individuals, with their vast resources, have the potential to shape policy and public opinion in ways that prioritize their interests over those of the general populace.
As Trump takes the oath of office, some of these modern-day barons will likely be sitting on the very dais, a stark symbol of the cozy relationship between political power and wealth. One can only imagine Teddy Roosevelt, the trust-busting president who fought against the robber barons of his time, spinning in his grave at the sight of such blatant coddling of today’s tycoons.
In an era where the ultra-rich continue to accumulate unprecedented wealth, policies that inflict suffering on the vulnerable only exacerbate existing inequalities. The concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few echoes the concerns of an oligarchic system, one where the interests of the many are overshadowed by the few. For Canadians, who value fairness and equality, the spectre of a society where happiness is derived from the misery of others is deeply troubling.
January 4, 2025
As we brace for the changes that Trump 2.0 will bring, it is essential for Canadians to reflect on our values and the kind of world we wish to promote. While the challenges are significant, they also present an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to inclusion, cooperation, and justice. By standing firm in our principles, Canada can serve as a beacon of hope and a model for equitable governance in an increasingly divided world.
While the coming Trump administration may bring uncertainty and challenges, it also underscores the importance of solidarity and resilience. As Canadians, we must tread the choppy waters of this new era with determination and commitment to our core values, ensuring that we remain a force for good in a world that desperately needs it. The threat of oligarchy, underscored by the influence of figures like Musk and other billionaire elites, only strengthens our resolve to champion democracy and equality for all.
As Donald Trump gets set for his inauguration (announced just today that it’s to move indoors due to… get this… a blast of cold Arctic air coming in from Canada on January 20, ironically,) there’s a growing sense of unease, particularly from a Canadian perspective. The promises of a “new golden age” seem to shine brightest for the privileged elite, leaving many of us across the border concerned about the widening gap between the ultra-rich and the rest of society.
Trump’s tax cuts appear poised to further enrich billionaires, exacerbating income inequality and leaving social justice, human rights, and environmental advocates bracing for challenging times ahead. His aggressive stance on immigration, with plans for mass deportations, threatens to bring misery to undocumented migrants in the United States, while his approach to foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine, could destabilize global peace efforts.
For us Canadians, the looming 25% tariffs on imports are especially troubling. These tariffs not only risk economic strain and job losses in Canada but also hint at a broader trend of isolationism and protectionism that could strain our historically close relationship with the United States.
Under Trump’s leadership, there is an unsettling convergence of political power and wealth, drawing parallels with oligarchies where influential oligarchs wield significant control over governance. This shift raises alarms about the future of democratic values, as the comforted will likely find more comfort, while the afflicted may face increased hardships. It’s a reality that many Americans seem content with, but for those of us looking in from the outside, there’s little to celebrate.
As Canadians, we value inclusivity, cooperation, and justice. The coming years may require us to reflect deeply on these principles and act to uphold them, not just within our own borders but in our interactions with the world. It’s going to be a challenging ride, but in adversity, there’s an opportunity to reaffirm our commitment to these values and work towards a more equitable future for all.
Please enjoy the January 18, 2025 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday or Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons.
The Grocery Code of Conduct is a Well-Intentioned But Ultimately Ineffective Measure
August 2, 2023
Voluntary codes of conduct, by their nature, often lack the necessary enforcement mechanisms to drive meaningful change. Similar initiatives in other sectors, such as the Air Passenger Bill of Rights, have shown that without mandatory compliance and stringent enforcement, these measures tend to fall short of their promises. The grocery code, which aims to regulate retailer-supplier relations, risks becoming another well-intentioned but ineffective gesture if not properly enforced.
A critical misconception is that this code will help lower grocery prices. The code focuses on improving fairness and transparency between suppliers and retailers, addressing issues like dispute resolution and contractual clarity. While these are important objectives, they do not directly influence consumer prices. High food prices are primarily driven by broader economic factors such as inflation, currency devaluation, and global supply chain disruptions. Expecting the grocery code to mitigate these complex issues is unrealistic and misguides public expectations.
High food prices in Canada reflect larger systemic problems, including inflation, government spending, and global economic pressures, which have led to increased costs across various sectors. The grocery code addresses only a small part of these broader issues and is unlikely to significantly impact consumer purchasing power. The direct beneficiaries of the code are industry players who will see improved business operations and potentially reduced inefficiencies, rather than consumers experiencing lower prices.
For meaningful change, a comprehensive approach is needed to tackle the root causes of high prices. This includes addressing inflation, enhancing supply chain resilience, and implementing regulatory measures with real enforcement power. A mandatory code with clear penalties for non-compliance would serve as a stronger deterrent against unfair practices. Additionally, broader economic policies that enhance productivity and stabilize the currency would have a more profound impact on consumer prices.
While the grocery code of conduct is a step toward improving industry practices, it is not sufficient to address the underlying economic challenges driving high prices. To truly protect consumers and achieve lower prices, more robust and comprehensive solutions are required. (AI)
Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 24, 2023
Deep Water Rubber Necking Will Always Thrill Some, Despite Safety Concerns
July 13, 2021
The recent tragedy involving the Titan submersible has reignited the debate around deep-sea tourism safety. While calls for stricter regulations are expected, enforcing them across international waters poses challenges. The incident was an outlier, as most deep-sea excursions have been incident-free for over 60 years. Although safety is crucial, deep sea rubber necking will continue to be sought after by thrill-seekers with means.
The absence of regulations in international waters makes implementing safety measures difficult. Industry experts support certification for submersibles, but passing and enforcing regulations globally is complex. Responsible submersible operators prioritize safety, exploring natural phenomena at depths of 500 meters or less. It’s vital to distinguish between such operators and OceanGate’s unconventional decision with the Titan.
News: OceanGate Was Warned of Potential for ‘Catastrophic’ Problems With Titanic Mission
Despite the tragedy, the allure of deep-sea exploration remains. Future expeditions may include submarine tours to view the Titanic and Titan debris. While safety regulations should be enhanced, the limitations in international waters must be acknowledged. Rather than focusing solely on oversight, improving operations and responsible practices should be prioritized within the submersible industry.
The families affected by the Titanic disaster express their disdain for exploring their loved ones’ resting place. Their emotional pleas remind us of the tragedy. However, responsible and respectful expeditions can offer valuable historical insights.
Deep sea rubber necking will always captivate some individuals, and the fascination with exploring iconic shipwrecks will persist. Balancing regulation and the freedom to explore the depths is a delicate task. As technology advances, we must ensure future expeditions prioritize safety while continuing to ignite our curiosity about the wonders hidden beneath the waves. (AI) | Also printed in the Toronto Star.
If the editorial cartoon in Saturday’s Spec was meant to be humorous, it failed miserably. Maybe staff forgot that five people perished in a completely avoidable tragedy.
If the cartoon was meant to inform or entertain, again it missed the mark. The cartoon is in fact an affront to the memories of those who died.
The Spec has of late been very conscientious about holding various public institutions to account, but this cartoon makes all of that seem artificial and shows your true colours.
Jack Coruzzi, Brantford
Cartoon nailed it
MacKay’s Saturday cartoon was brilliant and spot on. Adventure tourism gets headlines for billionaires who cost the public millions, while 500 refugees died in an accident on the Mediterranean, and hardly a word was uttered. We live in a shameful society that needs to be called out by satirists like MacKay.
Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 21, 2023
Trudeau’s Military Shortcomings and Jet-Setting Splurges
July 11, 2020
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been known for his luxurious lifestyle and expensive vacations, often jet setting with his family to extravagant destinations. Recently, it has been revealed that the Trudeaus spent their holiday season at a lavish estate in Jamaica owned by a wealthy family that made a large donation to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation just two years ago. While the trip was cleared by the ethics commissioner before departure, questions arise about the optics of such a trip at a time when many Canadians are struggling financially due to the high cost of goods and services, and Trudeau’s government has been accused of contributing to inflation and neglecting the cost of living crisis.
But Trudeau’s expensive trips are not a new phenomenon. In the past, he has faced criticism for his trips to the Aga Khan’s island in 2016, which earned him a reprimand from the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner, and for renting a luxury suite at great expense during Queen Elizabeth II’s funeral in London in 2021. These trips have cost Canadian taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, raising questions about Trudeau’s priorities and spending habits.
What is particularly troubling is that Trudeau’s lavish lifestyle and expensive vacations come at a time when he has been criticized for being a cheapskate on military obligations and a global security laggard. The Trudeau government has been repeatedly called out for underfunding the military and neglecting Canada’s defense obligations, both domestically and internationally. As the world faces increasing security challenges, including threats from adversaries such as China and Russia, Canada’s military readiness and capabilities have been called into question.
January 11, 2023
Moreover, Trudeau’s disregard for military obligations is not just a matter of underfunding, but also a lack of commitment to international alliances and partnerships. Canada has traditionally been a strong ally in international security efforts, including NATO and peacekeeping missions. However, under Trudeau’s leadership, Canada has fallen behind in meeting its military commitments to these alliances. This has raised concerns among Canada’s allies and partners, who rely on Canada’s contributions to global security efforts.
Trudeau’s penchant for luxury vacations and expensive trips while neglecting military obligations and global security commitments sends a troubling message to Canadians and the international community. It suggests a lack of priorities and a disregard for the real threats and challenges that Canada faces in today’s world. While Trudeau enjoys the perks of his lavish lifestyle, Canadian taxpayers foot the bill for his extravagant trips, including the recent trip to Jamaica that cost at least $162,000 in taxpayer expenses for security and other costs.
November 17, 2015
It’s time for Trudeau to reassess his priorities and demonstrate a genuine commitment to fulfilling Canada’s military obligations and global security commitments. As the world becomes more complex and uncertain, Canada cannot afford to have a leader who neglects these critical responsibilities while living a life of luxury. Canadians deserve a leader who prioritizes their security and well-being over personal indulgences. It’s time for Trudeau to step up and show true leadership in addressing Canada’s military and security challenges, rather than being known as a cheapskate on military obligations and a global security laggard while enjoying expensive vacations.(AI)