workshop

Thursday December 10, 2020

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday December 10, 2020

Doug Ford takes an axe to greenbelt protections

First, Doug Ford big-footed environmental protections and local authority. Then he went home early, adjourning the legislature until February. Not a bad day’s work for Ford and friends.

November 13, 2020

Under the cover of COVID-19, the government is hacking and slashing the network of regulations and oversight that for years helped balance the preservation of Ontario’s environment with the interests of voracious development.

Think back to before Ford became leader of the not-progressive conservative party. He was recorded telling a roomful of his development industry friends that he would ensure Ontario’s cherished greenbelt would be opened to allow development.

In case you’ve forgotten, the outcry was immediate and very loud. So much so that Ford had to publicly retract his pledge, and reassure Ontarians that he would respect their will on the greenbelt.

But Ford never said he wouldn’t use a back door to accomplish the same objectives. This week, he demonstrated that he has done exactly that.

May 3, 2018

Schedule 6 may sound innocuous, but it is anything but. Passed this week as part of the government’s Bill 229 — a pandemic recovery bill for heaven’s sake — it neuters all of Ontario’s conservation authorities. Their mandate is now dramatically narrower, and a government minister will have the power to veto conservation authority decisions. 

Ontarians have been able to rely on conservation authorities for years to effectively manage and protect rivers, tributaries, wetlands, forests and local drinking water. CAs are not perfect, but they generally work, and they represent local and regional interests. No longer. 

In another alarming change, the Conservation Authorities Act has been amended to allow the provincial minister complete control over issuing permits, with or without input from CAs. And there is no appealing the decisions.

December 11, 2018

Not satisfied with hobbling conservation authorities, the government is also making increased use of Ministerial Zoning Orders. MZOs allow the provincial minister to override planning and zoning decisions, regardless of local government or public input. Again, the decisions cannot be appealed.

This destruction of local control has not gone unnoticed. Conservation authorities, mayors, the Association of Ontario Municipalities, the Canadian Environmental Law Association, the World Wildlife Fund (Canada), Ontario Nature and Environmental Defence of Ontario have all spoken out strongly against the government’s centralization of control. Countless letters to the editor, columns and editorials have condemned the changes.

The government’s response was to double down and push the changes through, hidden deep in pandemic recovery omnibus legislation. 

All this is part of a disturbing big picture. Remember the Ontario Municipal Board, which provided a flawed method of appealing local planning decisions? The government replaced it with the Local Planning Appeals Tribunal (LPAT) a developer-friendly organization that almost always rules on the side of unfettered development.

Then came MZOs, being used increasingly to authorize zoning and planning changes in the absence of local due process and input. Then came the gutting of conservation areas, with their crucial oversight, including of Ontario’s drinking water.

Does anyone else see a theme here? Ever since Doug Ford blew up Toronto city council to suit his personal whims, it has been clear he is not remotely interested in local decision-making authority. He wants Ontario open for business, regardless of environmental impact. And he’s getting his wish. (Hamilton Spectator Editorial) 

 

Thursday December 10, 2015

By Graeme MacKay, Editorial Cartoonist, The Hamilton Spectator - Thursday December 10, 2015 Who could have predicted these problems for the Liberals? Absolutely everyone (By John Ivison) Who could have predicted the Liberal plan to raise taxes on top earners would not pay for a $3.4-billion cut for the middle class? Who could have forecast that the Liberal pledge to withdraw fighter jets from Iraq would rupture relations with the Americans? Apart from absolutely everyone, that is. Justin TrudeauÕs first Question Period as prime minister was a miserable affair for the government, so exposed is it on two policy positions that never made any sense Ð beyond being blatant political bait for voters so hungry for change they were prepared to swallow any mendacity. Bill Morneau, the finance minister, conceded in a late afternoon press conference that reducing the middle income bracket tax rate for nine million Canadians, while simultaneously raising the rate for the 319,000 taxpayers earning more than $200,000, would not be Òrevenue neutral,Ó as the election platform had claimed. The tax cut will amount to an average cut of $330 for individuals and $540 for couples Ñ which is welcome relief. But there must be serious doubts about the affordability of the measure Ñ something the Liberals would have known, even as they sold it as a wash financially. The day the proposal was released in early May, the CD Howe InstituteÕs research director, Alexandre Laurin, told me the tax package would never pay for itself. Experience in other jurisdictions such as the U.K. showed that tax receipts fall because people find ways to reduce their taxable income. He released a paper to that effect last week, suggesting the new income tax rate of 33% would yield less new revenue than the Liberals had suggested. The government admitted as much Monday, saying the new tax changes would cost a net amount of $1.2 billion a year for the next five years. Morneau has already given a fiscal upda

By Graeme MacKay, Editorial Cartoonist, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday December 10, 2015

Who could have predicted these problems for the Liberals? Absolutely everyone

(By John Ivison) Who could have predicted the Liberal plan to raise taxes on top earners would not pay for a $3.4-billion cut for the middle class?

Who could have forecast that the Liberal pledge to withdraw fighter jets from Iraq would rupture relations with the Americans?

Apart from absolutely everyone, that is.

Justin Trudeau’s first Question Period as prime minister was a miserable affair for the government, so exposed is it on two policy positions that never made any sense – beyond being blatant political bait for voters so hungry for change they were prepared to swallow any mendacity.

By Graeme MacKay, Editorial Cartoonist, The Hamilton Spectator - Thursday November 5, 2015 (James Mennie column) When you consider weÕve just come through a federal election campaign where the selfie proved itself a legitimate and highly effective political tool, it wasnÕt surprising this weekend to see Justin Trudeau, the undisputed winner of that campaign, proving once again he is the most photogenic prime minister designate in recent Canadian history. If you missed it, the Trudeau familyÕs trick or treat theme on Saturday night was rather eclectic, Mom and Dad going with a generic Star Wars look while the two older children opted for your standard Disney princess and sword toting bird ensemble while the youngest (the choice presumably made for him) was led from door to camera-crew-surrounded door as a Ninja Turtle. Given that Trudeau had already tweeted a Happy Halloween message and family portrait to his 932,000 followers, the images flooded social media and the comments seemed for the most part to be positive, many of them expressing delight at the countryÕs being led by so down to earth and happy looking a family. And when you consider that even the crustiest, most hard bitten political analysts have acknowledged that TrudeauÕs message of hope and positiveness pretty much cut Stephen HarperÕs campaign to ribbons, itÕs a pretty safe bet the optimistic glow engendered by the Liberal victory on Oct. 19 will continue beyond the swearing-in ceremony for Trudeau and his first cabinet scheduled for Wednesday. That said, IÕm not entirely sure that glow will still be around by, say, Christmas. And the reason I suspect TrudeauÕs national honeymoon wonÕt survive 2015 is that the selfie taking, Star Wars loving, YouTube dancing, drama teaching, musketeer mustachioed candidate- the guy who actually won this thing Ð will, by sheer political necessity, cease to exist once the words ÒSo help me GodÓ have left his lips on Wednesday. The transformation wonÕt be due to pr

Bill Morneau, the finance minister, conceded in a late afternoon press conference that reducing the middle income bracket tax rate for nine million Canadians, while simultaneously raising the rate for the 319,000 taxpayers earning more than $200,000, would not be “revenue neutral,” as the election platform had claimed.

The tax cut will amount to an average cut of $330 for individuals and $540 for couples — which is welcome relief. But there must be serious doubts about the affordability of the measure — something the Liberals would have known, even as they sold it as a wash financially.

The day the proposal was released in early May, the CD Howe Institute’s research director, Alexandre Laurin, told me the tax package would never pay for itself. Experience in other jurisdictions such as the U.K. showed that tax receipts fall because people find ways to reduce their taxable income.

Wednesday, December 11, 2013He released a paper to that effect last week, suggesting the new income tax rate of 33% would yield less new revenue than the Liberals had suggested.

The government admitted as much Monday, saying the new tax changes would cost a net amount of $1.2 billion a year for the next five years.

Morneau has already given a fiscal update suggesting that slower than expected growth has turned a forecast surplus this fiscal year into a deficit of $3 billion, before any Liberal campaign promises are factored in.

The new government had pledged that it would rack up deficits of $25 billion over three years, before returning to surplus in 2019-20. (Continued: National Post)

Published in the Winnipeg Free Press, Friday December 11, 2015

Published in the Winnipeg Free Press, Friday December 11, 2015