MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

Mark Carney

Have Yourself A Very Tumultuous Christmas

December 21, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

In a Dickensian twist, Justin Trudeau is cast as Scrooge, haunted by the ghost of his father Pierre and other spirits, confronting the fading legacy of his leadership and the mounting pressure to step aside for the good of his party and country.

Justin Trudeau’s Crisis Week

Saturday December 21, 2024 | Substack edition 7

And just like that, Christmas is just around the corner, and another year of editorial cartoons has flown by. Well, almost. There’s still plenty to come from me as 2024 wraps up, but for now, things are on autopilot until my return on January 3, when fresh material makes its debut. This past week’s cartoons, however, felt like a microcosm of the chaos that has defined Canadian politics—and, frankly, global affairs—in 2024. Let’s dive into the whirlwind that was quite possibly Justin Trudeau‘s week from hell.

Monday

As Canada delves into an inquiry on foreign interference, the parallels between Pierre Poilievre and Donald Trump, including their mutual distrust of institutions, the media, and their overblown characterization of opponents as criminals, raise questions about their impact on the political landscape as the elections approach.

January 30, 2024

Prelude to the week: Who’s the True Foreign Meddler

Since November 5, my editorial cartoons have focused heavily on the repercussions of “Donald Trump 2.0” and what his presidency means for humanity. Even a political crisis in Canada—one we haven’t seen the likes of in years—should ideally shift attention away from the Trump spectacle, but he managed to insert himself into our domestic drama regardless. It’s fair to say that Trudeau might not find himself in such an awkward position were it not for Trump’s victory and the barrage of threats he unleashed toward Canada following the November 5 election.

With that context, we begin this week’s review with a re-run of an editorial cartoon from January 30, 2024. As Canada probes foreign interference in its electoral process, Pierre Poilievre’s response to the inquiry, coupled with his perceived similarities to Trump—especially their shared mistrust of institutions and the media—has become a defining aspect of the political narrative. While much attention has been paid to subversive foreign interference by nations like Russia, India, and Iran, the most blatant meddler, Donald Trump, has been hiding in plain sight. Poilievre, meanwhile, seems either oblivious or willfully blind to Trump’s influence, refusing to obtain the necessary security clearance that would allow him to fully grasp the scope of foreign interference in Ottawa’s political process.

Tuesday

The resignation of Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau's top ally and Finance Minister, coupled with rising cabinet instability, signals a deepening crisis for the Prime Minister's leadership as public confidence wanes.

December 17, 2024

The day after the start of Trudeau’s Week From Hell

The political earthquake that was Chrystia Freeland’s sudden resignation as Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister sent shockwaves through Ottawa. Freeland, once a trusted ally and a key figure in Trudeau’s government, publicly criticized his economic relief measures as “costly gimmicks,” a pointed rebuke that left little doubt about the growing discord within the Liberal Party. Her departure came on the eve of the fall economic update, a crucial moment to reassure Canadians about the government’s plans amid rising deficits and inflationary pressures.

Freeland’s exit was not an isolated event. It followed the earlier resignation of Sean Fraser, another high-profile cabinet member, leaving Trudeau’s leadership looking increasingly fragile. These resignations, combined with existing caucus discontent, highlighted the Liberal government’s inability to manage internal divisions and external challenges simultaneously. At a time when Trudeau’s leadership is being questioned more than ever, the loss of Freeland—a figure respected for her competence and steady hand—raises questions about whether his government can even limp through the rest of its term, let alone mount a credible re-election campaign.

Wednesday

A distracted and weakened federal government has created a leadership vacuum, forcing the provinces to step up in addressing the existential challenges posed by a potential second Trump presidency.

December 18, 2024

Super Premiers Gather at The Council of the Federation

With the federal government mired in scandals and dysfunction, Canada’s provincial premiers seized the moment to assert themselves. A gathering of the Council of the Federation (which has a Super Friends Hall of Justice ring to it) showcased a growing trend: provincial leaders stepping into roles traditionally dominated by Ottawa. From energy policies to economic resilience, these so-called “super premiers” are taking the reins, crafting regional solutions to issues that demand a cohesive national response.

My parody of portraying this group of sub-national heroes as a comic book joins a growing collection of covers I’ve drawn over the years.

The stakes could not be higher. Canada is facing significant external challenges, including the economic uncertainty posed by Donald Trump’s potential return to the White House, which could bring new trade tensions and security risks. Yet the federal government, preoccupied with political infighting and bureaucratic inertia, has been slow to act. The premiers’ push for greater autonomy underscores Ottawa’s failure to provide leadership on pressing issues like energy, housing, interprovincial trade, and national unity.

But while the premiers’ efforts highlight their regions’ resilience, they also expose cracks in the federation. The lack of a unified approach risks further fraying national cohesion, with provinces charting divergent paths that could leave Canada vulnerable and unprepared for future crises. It’s a stark reminder that without federal leadership, Canada’s ability to navigate complex domestic and global challenges remains deeply compromised.

Thursday

Canada must confront U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s provocative meddling, including sovereignty-eroding rhetoric, damaging trade policies, and misogynistic attacks, with a coordinated and decisive response to reaffirm its independence and global standing.

December 19, 2024

Torment From Toddler Trump 2.0

Donald Trump’s provocations toward Canada have gone from rhetorical jabs to outright attempts at destabilization. Calling Canada a “51st state” and levelling baseless accusations about trade deficits might seem like typical Trump hyperbole, but his remarks carry real consequences. Insulting Chrystia Freeland with misogynistic slurs not only demeans one of Canada’s most respected leaders but also forces the country to respond to petty provocations rather than focus on substantive policy issues.

Trump’s meddling is unique in its overt nature, unlike the covert operations of other foreign actors. Weaponizing social media and his vast platform, Trump spreads disinformation and stokes divisions within Canada, from debates over social programs to the very fabric of Canadian bilingualism. His influence extends beyond words; his rhetoric emboldens populist movements and challenges Canadian leaders to respond decisively.

While some, like Ontario Premier Doug Ford, have spoken out against Trump’s antics, others, including Justin Trudeau, have struggled to mount a consistent response. Canada’s failure to counter Trump’s provocations (wedgies or gotchie pulls) effectively reflects a deeper problem: a lack of unity and strategic vision to safeguard its sovereignty. To stand tall in the face of such overt meddling, Canadian leaders must prioritize assertive diplomacy, robust economic policies, and a clear message that Canada will not be intimidated or diminished by external forces.

Friday

Justin Trudeau’s increasingly apparent political vulnerabilities, underscored by missteps with Mark Carney, Chrystia Freeland, and Dominic LeBlanc, suggest his leadership tenure is on shaky ground as party dissent grows and alternatives emerge.

December 20, 2024

Leadership Aspirants Circle the Wagons

Justin Trudeau’s time as Prime Minister increasingly feels like it’s drawing to a close, as discontent within the Liberal Party reaches a boiling point. Chrystia Freeland’s resignation was not just a blow to Trudeau’s government—it was also a signal that cracks within the party are widening. Freeland’s exit, combined with Trudeau’s inability to bring Mark Carney into the fold as a stabilizing force, highlights his waning political capital and his struggle to maintain unity within his caucus.

Mark Carney, a globally respected figure, was seen as a potential saviour for the Liberals, someone who could inject credibility and vision into a government besieged by scandal and policy missteps. Yet, the overtures to Carney backfired spectacularly, alienating Freeland, who reportedly felt sidelined, and emboldening Dominic LeBlanc as a potential leadership contender. LeBlanc, a seasoned politician and long-time Trudeau ally, now appears better positioned to take the reins should Trudeau step aside.

Meanwhile, frustrations among Liberal grassroots supporters and high-profile defections reflect a party grappling with an identity crisis. Trudeau, once the charismatic leader who revitalized the Liberals, is now seen as a liability by many within his own ranks. With the Conservatives surging under Pierre Poilievre and internal Liberal divisions deepening, the question is no longer if Trudeau will go, but when—and whether the party can reinvent itself in time to remain a viable political force.

Saturday

In a Dickensian twist, Justin Trudeau is cast as Scrooge, haunted by the ghost of his father Pierre and other spirits, confronting the fading legacy of his leadership and the mounting pressure to step aside for the good of his party and country.

December 21, 2024

A Christmas Carol,: The Ottawa Version

The final political editorial cartoon of the year ends with a Christmas theme. As the holidays arrive, I’m reminded of A Christmas Carol—specifically the 1951 Alastair Sim version, a favourite of mine for its moody black-and-white atmosphere. Dickens’ timeless tale of reckoning feels apt for Justin Trudeau, who faces ghosts of his own: his father, Pierre, representing the ideals of the past; disenchanted allies of the present; and the grim spectre of a party in decline if he clings to power.

Like Scrooge, Trudeau stands at a crossroads. Will he find redemption through reflection, or ignore the warnings, risking his legacy and his party’s future? As Scrooge embraced change to rewrite his fate, Trudeau may need his own moment of clarity before the clock runs out.

Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Saturday morning (this one came out on December 21, 2024)  as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. During the week “notes” are posted daily to Substack which are used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. Subscriptions will always be free – as long as my position remains as a staff editorial cartoonist. Thanks.

Please Subscribe. It’s free!

 

 

Posted in: Canada, Substack Post, USA Tagged: 2024-23, Canada, Chrystia Freeland, Donald Trump, Doug Ford, Justin Trudeau, Mark Carney, Premiers, Substack

Friday December 20, 2024

December 20, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday December 20, 2024

Justin Trudeau’s increasingly apparent political vulnerabilities, underscored by missteps with Mark Carney, Chrystia Freeland, and Dominic LeBlanc, suggest his leadership tenure is on shaky ground as party dissent grows and alternatives emerge.

Justin Trudeau’s Days Are Numbered: A Weakening Grip on Power

The resignation of Chrystia Freeland, Trudeau's top ally and Finance Minister, coupled with rising cabinet instability, signals a deepening crisis for the Prime Minister's leadership as public confidence wanes.

December 17, 2024

The sudden resignation of Chrystia Freeland as Finance Minister, Mark Carney’s reluctance to enter the political arena, and Dominic LeBlanc’s rapid ascent to power all underscore one undeniable truth: Justin Trudeau’s hold on Canada’s Liberal Party and his premiership is hanging by a thread. Whether Trudeau chooses to face an election or not, it seems everyone—except Trudeau himself—has come to recognize his diminishing authority and the fractures within his government.

Opinion: Carney and LeBlanc are the ones to watch in a Liberal leadership race

For months, speculation swirled about Trudeau’s secret weapon: Mark Carney, the globally respected former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England. Trudeau’s rumoured plan was to bring Carney into the fold, appoint him as finance minister, and use his economic gravitas to shore up a government floundering under mounting fiscal and geopolitical pressures.

April 6, 2021

et, the gambit failed before it began. Reports suggest that Carney balked at the opportunity, wary of tying his reputation to a government increasingly viewed as out of touch and ineffective. Carney’s refusal to join Trudeau’s team was not just a personal decision; it was a stark commentary on the Liberal government’s waning credibility. Carney saw the writing on the wall, even if Trudeau did not.

Chrystia Freeland’s resignation marked a seismic shift. As Matt Gurney argued in The Toronto Star, Freeland had long been a rare voice of realism in a cabinet characterized by performative politics and a lack of substantive action. Her departure—accompanied by a pointed critique of the government’s failures—left Trudeau politically exposed and without his most credible lieutenant.

Freeland’s tenure revealed a fundamental disconnect between rhetoric and reality in Trudeau’s government. While she championed policies aimed at hardening Canada against global instability, she was ultimately complicit in a government that did little to advance those goals. Her exit signals not only disillusionment but also a vacuum in leadership that Trudeau seems unable to fill.

Opinion: Chrystia Freeland is not a hero

Canadians have the right to know the identities of the MPs allegedly collaborating with foreign governments to ensure accountability and protect the integrity of our democracy.

June 7, 2024

Enter Dominic LeBlanc, Trudeau’s most trusted ally and now the newly appointed finance minister. LeBlanc’s political pedigree, pragmatic approach, and unwavering loyalty make him a stabilizing force in a government plagued by crises. Being four years older than the Prime Minster, he once played the role as babysitter to Justin and his brothers in their younger days. Yet, his rise also underscores the increasingly insular nature of Trudeau’s inner circle. LeBlanc’s appointment is not a bold move for renewal but a defensive play to maintain control amidst growing uncertainty.

LeBlanc’s dual portfolios—finance and intergovernmental affairs—position him as Trudeau’s de facto deputy. However, his ascent also raises questions about the party’s future. Is LeBlanc merely a caretaker, or is he positioning himself as the heir apparent in a post-Trudeau era?

As Trudeau’s government stumbles, attention is turning to the next generation of Liberal leaders. In addition to LeBlanc, several figures are emerging as potential contenders:

  • Francois-Philippe Champagne brings energy and a focus on international trade but lacks widespread support.
  • Melanie Joly offers a polished public image and a focus on foreign affairs but may struggle to overcome perceptions of being lightweight.
  • Anita Anand is a rising star known for her competence and crisis management during the pandemic, yet her relative inexperience in national politics could be a hurdle.
  • Sean Fraser, newly departed from cabinet, has shown promise but is untested at the highest levels of leadership.
  • Dominic LeBlanc’s star shines brightest among them, with his deep ties to the Liberal establishment and Trudeau’s trust bolstering his credentials.

July 26, 2023

The dynamics playing out within the Liberal Party point to a central reality: Justin Trudeau’s leadership is increasingly seen as a liability. Freeland’s critique, Carney’s rejection, and LeBlanc’s calculated loyalty all reflect a government running on borrowed time.

The situation is further complicated by Trudeau’s apparent blind spot regarding his own vulnerabilities. Despite mounting evidence of dissatisfaction within his cabinet, his party, and the electorate, Trudeau continues to project confidence. But confidence is not a substitute for vision, and his inability to adapt to a changing political landscape could prove fatal.

News: From Trudeau’s babysitter to loyal soldier, what we know about the new finance minister, Dominic LeBlanc

As the Trudeau government declines, personal grievances and internal fractures are surfacing among sidelined Liberal MPs, revealing a party consumed by its own infighting and struggling to survive a looming electoral defeat.

October 25, 2024

Should Trudeau choose to call an election, he risks exposing the full extent of his unpopularity. His government’s perceived failures on issues ranging from foreign interference to economic management provide ample ammunition for opposition parties. Even within the Liberal Party, murmurs of dissent suggest that Trudeau may face a leadership challenge before Canadians go to the polls.

If Trudeau delays an election, he risks further eroding his authority and alienating potential allies. Either way, his options are narrowing, and his days as prime minister seem numbered.

As Trudeau’s tenure appears to wind down, the Liberal Party faces a critical juncture. Will it embrace a leader like LeBlanc, who represents continuity and stability, or will it turn to a figure like Freeland or Anand, who might push for bolder reforms? Alternatively, could Mark Carney—despite his earlier hesitation—be persuaded to step into the fray?

What is clear is that the Trudeau era is nearing its conclusion. Whether he recognizes it or not, Justin Trudeau’s legacy will soon be in the hands of his successors. The choices they make will determine not only the future of the Liberal Party but also Canada’s place in an increasingly uncertain world.


The departure of a long-serving prime minister often ushers in a fascinating period in Canadian politics: the leadership race. For political nerds like me, it’s a time of intrigue, rivalries, and the jostling of ambition. Leadership races today lack the theatrical drama of the old political conventions, with their live floor fights and multiple ballots, but they still hold plenty of intrigue.

My first taste of this drama was the 1984 Liberal leadership convention following Pierre Trudeau’s exit. It was a contest of personalities, much like the one brewing today. Back then, it boiled down to a clash between two camps. On one side was John Turner, the outsider who’d broken with Trudeau years earlier, akin to the role of Chrystia Freeland,  combined with the unknown economic whiz that Mark Carney might play today. Turner faced off against Pierre Trudeau’s loyal insider, Jean Chrétien—trusted and tested, much like Dominic LeBlanc appears to be now in Justin Trudeau’s cabinet.

The irony of history repeating itself doesn’t stop there. Jean Chrétien, Trudeau Senior’s getaway driver in the 1970s, rose to become the standard-bearer of continuity for the Liberals. Dominic LeBlanc, who actually drove for Chrétien as a young man, now seems poised to fill that same role for Justin Trudeau. Political life in Canada is full of these poetic repetitions.

The current rumblings in Ottawa suggest Justin Trudeau’s time at the helm may be winding down, whether by electoral defeat or a leadership transition. If that’s true, the cast vying to succeed him promises a riveting spectacle. There’s Freeland, the globally connected and sharp-tongued former deputy PM, whose tensions with Trudeau over substance versus style have finally boiled over. Then there’s LeBlanc, the steady, loyal soldier who has been Trudeau’s go-to problem solver. Francois-Philippe Champagne, Melanie Joly, and Anita Anand also hover in the wings, each with their own ambitions and strategies.

And, of course, there’s Mark Carney. Unburdened by years of cabinet service under Trudeau, he stands apart, calculating his odds like a cautious investor eyeing a volatile stock. Picture Carney with a Geiger counter, measuring the radioactive fallout from Trudeau’s tenure, keeping his distance while others, like Freeland and LeBlanc, show clear signs of exposure. “As a numbers guy, I can report the situation isn’t good,” he might quip in an editorial cartoon.

The parallels to 1984 are striking, but the stakes feel higher. The Liberal Party isn’t just deciding on a leader; it’s grappling with what kind of party it wants to be in a world that demands harder power and clearer vision. Trudeau’s brand of progressive optimism has hit a wall, leaving his successors to wrestle with a much harsher geopolitical and domestic reality.

For political nerds, it’s the best show in town. And while the leadership race won’t be decided on a dramatic convention floor, the behind-the-scenes manoeuvring will be just as compelling. Keep an eye on the contenders—Canada’s next chapter is being written in their ambitions and alliances.

Justin Trudeau’s tenure as Prime Minister appears increasingly precarious, with his recent handling of key figures like Mark Carney, Chrystia Freeland, and Dominic LeBlanc highlighting both his diminished political capital and his inability to manage growing discontent within his own ranks. The failed bid to recruit Carney as a stabilizing force in government backfired, alienating Freeland, his former ally, and elevating LeBlanc as a more likely successor. Meanwhile, grassroots frustration and high-profile defections within the Liberal Party reflect a growing consensus that Trudeau’s leadership, once an asset, has become a liability in the face of a resurgent Conservative opposition and mounting internal strife.

Enjoy the December 2, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below. Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cart

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2024-22, Anita Anand, Canada, Chrystia Freeland, Dominic LeBlanc, Francois-Philippe Champagne, Justin Trudeau, leadership, Liberal, Mark Carney, Melanie Joly, radioactivity, Substack

Wednesday September 11, 2024

September 11, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Mark Carney’s appointment to lead the Liberal task force offers hope for revitalizing the party, but it will likely require a leadership change to prevent a total collapse under Justin Trudeau’s tenure.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday September 11, 2024

Mark Carney’s Arrival Could Be the Lifeline the Liberals Desperately Need

June 6, 2024

The federal Liberal Party is in crisis. Polls have been trending downward for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who, after nearly a decade in office, appears to be losing his grip on both the party and the public. Many believe Trudeau’s time is up, with growing calls for him to step aside before the next election. As the Liberals face what looks like an inevitable reckoning, Mark Carney’s arrival as chair of an economic growth task force offers a glimmer of hope. But can Carney, with his global financial pedigree, save the party from its current slump?

Opinion: Being tired of Justin Trudeau is not a good reason to vote him out

Public fatigue with Trudeau has set in (and like it or not as in the case of the author in the article linked above), with many Canadians increasingly disillusioned by his handling of economic issues, particularly the growing national debt and housing affordability. Longtime Liberal supporters are expressing their frustration, feeling disconnected from the party’s direction under Trudeau’s leadership. As one disenchanted voter remarked, “Resign immediately, you are finished. I was a lifelong Liberal until his government,” capturing a sentiment shared by many who believe Trudeau’s policies have alienated the party’s base.

December 30, 2021

This dissatisfaction makes the upcoming byelection in LaSalle—Émard—Verdun, a Liberal stronghold in Montreal, a critical moment. Should the Liberals lose this seat, it would serve as a definitive sign that the Trudeau era is on the brink of collapse. In this context, Carney’s entry as a key figure in shaping the party’s economic vision may be the last viable strategy to stop the bleeding. He is untainted by the political baggage of the Trudeau administration, which offers a fresh face and a potentially invigorating presence in a party that desperately needs new energy.

Mark Carney’s credentials are impressive. His tenure as governor of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England during the 2008 financial crisis earned him global respect. Carney’s ability to stabilize markets and navigate complex economic challenges positions him as an asset in a time when economic anxiety dominates public discourse. But Carney’s entry into politics raises a deeper question: can a technocrat with a distinguished international résumé translate that success into electoral appeal?

Carney’s role in chairing the economic task force will involve consulting with business, labor, and Indigenous leaders to craft a platform focused on middle-class growth. His perspective, free from the entrenched political patterns of recent years, could indeed offer an opportunity to shift the narrative. In fact, his global experience and pragmatic approach might serve as the perfect antidote to the populist appeal of Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, whose “everything’s broken” rhetoric has gained traction among voters frustrated with the status quo.

News: Mark Carney joins Liberals’ economic growth task force

The popularity surges of leaders like Justin Trudeau and Pierre Poilievre highlight the perilous tendency of voters to invest unrealistic faith in political figures, underscoring the importance of maintaining critical analysis and skepticism in democratic engagement.

April 13, 2024

Pierre Poilievre’s rise within the Conservative Party has been marked by his dark, cynical depiction of Canada’s present state. His appeal is built on a promise to “fix” a broken country, a message that resonates with many who feel left behind. But Carney’s economic expertise and forward-looking approach offer a positive alternative. Unlike Poilievre’s gloomy pessimism, Carney represents the possibility of steering Canada toward a more hopeful, globally integrated future. His emphasis on economic growth, job creation, and pragmatic policies could counter the growing appeal of Poilievre’s populist surge.

In contrast to the Conservatives’ focus on austerity and deep spending cuts, Carney brings a vision of balanced growth and sustainable investment, aiming to restore fiscal health without exacerbating inequality. This approach may prove more appealing to moderate voters, who are wary of the rightward shift in the Conservative Party under Poilievre’s leadership.

April 6, 2021

For this to work, however, Trudeau must recognize the writing on the wall. The reality is that, despite Carney’s credentials, the Liberals will not regain their footing without a decisive change at the top. As one commenter astutely pointed out, “Carney should stand aside and let the party fail if Trudeau refuses to step aside. Nothing Carney can do will resurrect the Liberals’ election chances without a leadership change”.

This sentiment reflects the growing consensus that Trudeau’s leadership is becoming a liability rather than an asset. Should Trudeau stubbornly cling to power, Carney’s efforts may be in vain, as he risks being associated with the same failed policies and political missteps.

Opinion: Justin Trudeau draws in Mark Carney as Liberal MPs gather to consider the coming election

May 2, 2009

It is possible that Trudeau’s appointment of Carney to this prominent role is a calculated step toward a leadership transition. The speculation surrounding Carney as a potential successor has been persistent for years. If Trudeau’s government were to falter in the upcoming byelection or suffer further political setbacks, a leadership race could be triggered sooner than expected. In such a scenario, Carney’s entrance would not be as an economic adviser, but as the face of a revitalized Liberal Party.

For now, Carney’s task is monumental. He must navigate the current crisis while laying the groundwork for a more prosperous future. Whether this is part of a larger plan to position him as Trudeau’s heir or simply a last-ditch effort to salvage the Liberal brand, one thing is clear: the stakes could not be higher. Canada’s political landscape is shifting, and the outcome of these developments will define the country’s direction for years to come. (AI)

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2024-16, Canada, caucus, Chrystia Freeland, Harjit Sajjan, Hedy Fry, Justin Trudeau, leadership, Liberal, Marc Miller, Mark Carney, Pablo Rodriguez, party, retreat, Steven Guilbeault, Valerie Bradford

Wednesday June 5, 2024

June 5, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Mark Carney emerges as a potential saviour for Canada's struggling Liberal Party, offering a fresh face and the ability to restore public confidence.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday June 5, 2024

A Fresh Face for Canada’s Tired Government

April 6, 2021

As Justin Trudeau’s popularity wanes and his polling numbers hit new lows, the Liberal Party of Canada finds itself in need of a leader who can reinvigorate the party and restore public confidence. While the current hopefuls for the leadership position, including Chrystia Freeland, Melanie Jolie, Dominic LeBlanc, and François-Philippe Champagne, are all experienced cabinet ministers, their close association with Trudeau may hinder their chances of winning over disillusioned voters. It seems increasingly more apparent that Mark Carney, the former Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, could be the heir apparent for the Liberal Party, offering a fresh face and a break from the past.

Trudeau’s declining popularity has been evident in recent polls as public trust erodes due to controversies surrounding the WE Charity scandal, the mishandling of the SNC-Lavalin affair, and the perception of broken promises. With an election on the horizon, the Liberal Party needs a leader who can effectively address these concerns and restore faith in the government.

Opinion: ‘Maybe the knives come out’: If the Liberals lose this Toronto byelection, Justin Trudeau could be in big trouble

September 10, 2022

The current potential successors, have all served as cabinet ministers in Trudeau’s government. While they may possess valuable experience and expertise, their close association with Trudeau and his administration could be seen as a liability by voters seeking a fresh start. It is crucial for the Liberal Party to present a leader who can distance themselves from the controversies and missteps of the past.

Mark Carney’s impressive resume and international reputation make him a compelling choice as the heir apparent for the Liberal Party. As the former Governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, Carney has demonstrated his ability to navigate complex economic challenges and provide stable leadership. His experience in the financial sector could be a valuable asset as Canada recovers from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Carney’s lack of direct involvement in Trudeau’s government offers a unique advantage. He can position himself as a fresh face, untarnished by the controversies that have plagued the current administration. Carney’s international standing and reputation for competence could help rebuild trust and confidence in the Liberal Party, both domestically and on the global stage.

Analysis: Some Liberals think Mark Carney could succeed Justin Trudeau. We talked to those who think he’d be a great leader — and others who roll their eyes

February 11, 2009

In considering Carney as a potential successor, there is inspiration to be drawn from the above article which explores Carney’s qualifications, reputation, and the potential benefits of his leadership for the Liberal Party of Canada.

It’s always dangerous to put hope into any kind of messiah to revive a party. Trudeau’s leadership was born out of such circumstances when prospects for the party were at an all-time low some 12 years ago. The party, still clinging to power, seems destined to hit an electoral new low if it remains on the current course. Some may argue that if Trudeau goes, the effect will be a repeat of the disaster that the PC Party endured under Kim Campbell following the departure of Brian Mulroney. Others will point to the turnaround when Dalton McGuinty stepped down, averting electoral humiliation for the Liberals when Kathleen Wynne took over (at least for 5 years).

September 28, 2012

As the Liberal Party of Canada searches for a leader who can reinvigorate the party and restore public confidence, Mark Carney emerges as a strong contender. With Trudeau’s declining popularity and the potential drawbacks of the current hopefuls’ close association with the current government, Carney offers a fresh face and a break from the past. His impressive track record, international reputation, and ability to navigate complex economic challenges position him as a compelling choice for the heir apparent. The Liberal Party should seriously consider Carney as a leader who can revitalize the party and lead Canada into a brighter future. (AI)

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2024-11, Canada, carnival, Justin Trudeau, leadership, Liberal Party, Mark Carney, retirement

Tuesday April 6, 2021

April 13, 2021 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday April 6, 2021

Mark Carney would be a welcome addition to a Canadian political class

September 28, 2012

There is absolutely nothing wrong with Mark Carney entering politics, if that’s what he wants to do. But before taking the leap, Mr. Carney might want to ask himself: Am I Dwight Eisenhower or am I Michael Ignatieff?

The former governor of the Bank of Canada and then of England has a new book out and will deliver the keynote address at this week’s Liberal policy conference. Twitter is clucking.

“The beginning of a journey that will end in deep regret and the erosion [of] a critical independent pillar of a modern economy – the central bank,” declared Ken Boessenkool, who was an aide to former B.C. premier Christy Clark and prime minister Stephen Harper.

Liberals “don’t see – or care, really – how this could erode our institutions; they only see partisan gain,” Laval University Professor Stephen Gordon said.

But there are precedents, of sorts. Oliver Mowat quit his job as a judge to become Ontario Liberal premier. Lester Pearson moved without fuss from undersecretary of state (deputy minister) for External Affairs to secretary of state (minister).

February 11, 2009

Mr. Carney has been away from the Bank of Canada for eight years. He is superbly qualified for public office. He has views on the role of markets and governments in combatting climate change. If he wants to enter the arena, good on him. The political class in Canada needs all the talent it can find.

That said, Mr. Carney should bear a few things in mind (and is certainly already bearing them). First, he could seek to become a Liberal member of Parliament, only for the Liberal Party to lose the next election. Would he enjoy four years on the backbench?

Perhaps his ambition is to lead the party, if and when Justin Trudeau decides to depart. But that might not be soon. Mr. Trudeau rescued the federal Liberals from the brink of extinction, so while an effort by some disaffected cabal to push him out of the leadership would be in the finest tradition of the party, it’s unlikely to happen anytime soon.

If he does run for the Liberal leadership someday, Mr. Carney would make a formidable candidate. But not an invincible one.

Some figures have successfully taken over a party’s leadership from another field without difficulty. Mr. Eisenhower, who commanded the Allied forces in Europe during the Second World War, was so sought after that Harry Truman offered to step down as president if Mr. Eisenhower would seek the Democratic nomination in 1948. Instead, Ike chose the Republican Party in 1952, serving two terms as president.

May 2, 2009

Others have not fared so well. Mr. Ignatieff, a distinguished public intellectual, was supposed to rescue the Liberal Party from its unaccustomed sojourn in opposition. Instead, he led the party to a third-place finish in 2011.

Could Mr. Carney’s ego withstand the daily pummelling of Question Period? Could he dish out the political dirt when required? Leading a party is about more than crafting an environmentally sustainable fiscal policy. Speaking to a few dozen of the party faithful in Prince Albert on a cold February night is also part of the job.

And Mr. Carney would have a formidable political rival: his friend Chrystia Freeland, the Finance Minister, who is also rumoured to be contemplating a bid for the leadership if and when it comes open.

November 28, 2012

Both potential leaders appeal to the political, bureaucratic and cultural elite of Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal. Since they would be chasing the same voters (and dollars), it’s hard to imagine both of them seeking the Liberal leadership. If one runs, the other probably won’t.

Canada has benefited greatly from non-politician politicians. David Emerson was so interested in reviving Canada’s moribund trade policy, and so uninterested in politics, that he switched from the Liberal to Conservative front bench when Mr. Harper defeated Paul Martin in 2006.

Maurice Strong had a career in the oil business before taking on a variety of assignments for governments and the United Nations. C.D. Howe was a wealthy engineer before becoming “minister of everything” under Mackenzie King and Louis St. Laurent.

If Mr. Carney truly wishes to lead the Liberal Party and the country, Canadians of all political stripes should welcome the decision. If only all politicians had his chops. (Globe & Mail) 

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2021-13, Canada, leadership, Liberal, Mark Carney, messiah, party, saviour, speech, walking on water
« Previous 1 … 20 21 22 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...