Canada – mackaycartoons

Saturday June 21, 2025

June 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday June 21, 2025

Tariffs, Flames, and Summer Games: A Season of Surprises

December 20, 2022

As the summer solstice approaches on June 21, 2025, we find ourselves at a pivotal moment marked by significant political and environmental timelines. This longest day of the year, with its promise of extended daylight and warmer days, serves as a powerful metaphor for the varied and often conflicting timelines that shape our current reality.

In Canada, the government’s response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum has been met with criticism from industry leaders. Prime Minister Mark Carney has outlined a 30-day window to adjust counter-tariffs, dependent on progress in trade negotiations with President Donald Trump’s administration. This timeline reflects an urgent need to protect Canadian industries while dealing with the complexities of international diplomacy. However, the Canadian steel producers and workers express dissatisfaction, arguing that the measures fall short of addressing the crisis.

News: Steel industry groups say Carney’s retaliatory plan for U.S. tariffs ‘falls short’

June 17, 2025

Simultaneously, the passage of Bill C-5 looms large, threatening to strain relations between the Canadian government and First Nations communities. The Assembly of First Nations has voiced strong opposition, citing inadequate consultation and potential infringement on treaty rights. The potential for a “long, hot summer” of protests highlights the urgency and gravity of this issue.

Across the border, President Trump’s penchant for two-week timelines has become a hallmark of his administration. Whether it’s decisions on Iran, trade policies, or domestic issues, this timeline often serves as a placeholder, creating uncertainty and anticipation. While it allows for strategic flexibility, it also leaves allies and adversaries alike in a state of limbo, uncertain of the U.S.’s next moves.

News: A familiar metric: White House says to expect Iran decision within ‘two weeks’

July 29, 2023

As we stand on the cusp of summer, these timelines intersect with the broader context of a warming climate. Recent scenes of hellacious wildfires in Canada’s western provinces have underscored the immediate and devastating impact of climate change. These fires have ravaged landscapes and communities, serving as a stark reminder that more such events are likely in the months to come. The season brings with it the expected perils of wildfires, heatwaves, and extreme weather, underscoring the need for decisive action on climate change.

Disturbingly, despite the G7 meeting taking place just a few hundred kilometres from the whiffs of burning embers, the topic of climate change was not even offered up for discussion. This omission highlights a glaring disconnect between the urgent realities on the ground and the political agenda at the highest levels.

June 18, 2025

Yet, amid these challenges, there remains the hope and anticipation of summer vacations—a respite from the weight of decision-making and the relentless pace of news cycles. This summer, as we face these varied timelines, we are reminded of the delicate balance between urgency and patience, between action and reflection. The solstice, with its ancient traditions and astronomical significance, offers a moment to pause and consider how we can align our timelines with the natural rhythms of the Earth.

News: When is the summer solstice and what is it?

In a world fraught with uncertainty, the promise of warmer days and longer evenings invites us to find solace in the simple pleasures of summer. Whether it’s a moment of quiet reflection at dawn, a gathering with friends around a bonfire, or a long-anticipated vacation, let us embrace the season with a renewed sense of hope and purpose. As we await the decisions that will shape our future, may we find the courage to act with wisdom and the grace to savour the present.

Wednesday June 18, 2025

June 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday June 18, 2025

Trump’s G7 Exit: Same Play, Different Day

Donald Trump’s early exit from the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis serves as a reminder that this tendency is not new. It resurrects questions about the United States’ engagement in global affairs under his leadership, highlighting a pattern of ambiguity that has characterized Trump’s presidency and its impact on international relations.

June 9, 2018

From his abrupt departure during the 2018 Canadian-hosted summit to leaving the recent G7 meeting, Trump’s actions often puzzle observers and allies alike. The official reason for his hasty exit—the escalating Middle East conflict—contrasts sharply with his stated disinterest in negotiating peace, leaving the international community in a state of uncertainty about America’s role in the crisis between Iran and Israel.

Opinion: Even when he’s smiling, Trump stands apart

June 13, 2025

The summit in Kananaskis, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, aimed to address pressing global challenges, including the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy sought international support for tougher measures against Russia, amidst Trump’s approval of limited military aid to Ukraine. However, Trump’s absence from direct discussions with Zelenskyy underscores a missed opportunity for reaffirming U.S. commitment to Ukraine, further complicating diplomatic efforts.

This behaviour reflects a broader dilemma within U.S. foreign policy under Trump, fluctuating between the “America First” mantra that propelled him to power and the nation’s historic role as a leader in global affairs. The inconsistency creates an impression of a schizophrenic foreign policy, dictated by Trump’s immediate priorities and whims rather than a coherent strategy.

Analysis: For G7 leaders, immense global challenges weigh on agenda overshadowed by Trump

December 19, 2024

Trade remained another contentious issue, with unresolved discussions, particularly between the U.S. and Japan, highlighting the complexities of international diplomacy. Japan sought relief from U.S. auto tariffs, while Canada and the U.S. worked towards finalizing a trade agreement within a month. Yet, Trump’s focus on domestic and Middle Eastern issues overshadowed potential agreements, leaving allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments.

For some leaders, Trump’s early exit might be a relief. It provides the remaining G6 an opportunity to engage in critical discussions without the unpredictability that often accompanies Trump’s presence. This “adults in the room” scenario allows other world leaders to address pressing security challenges and explore strategies to fill the void left by America’s inconsistent participation.

Opinion: The G7 is dead – time to move on to the G6

President Donald Trump's presence at the 2025 G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, is set to influence discussions on trade, climate, and global security.

June 12, 2025

Reader comments echo this sentiment, critiquing Trump’s erratic behaviour and its negative impact on U.S. soft power. His approach, often seen as self-centred and disruptive, challenges traditional alliances and complicates diplomatic efforts. It leaves allies questioning the reliability of U.S. commitments and pondering their own strategies to navigate an uncertain geopolitical landscape.

As the world watches, the broader implications of Trump’s actions remain to be seen. The G7 Summit’s outcome, in the absence of U.S. leadership, may well reflect new alliances and strategies, redefining global cooperation in an era where traditional roles are increasingly blurred. Whether this signals a temporary shift or a longer-term realignment remains an open question, driven by the unpredictable nature of Trump’s presidency.

Tuesday June 17, 2025

June 17, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 17, 2025

The Need for Inclusive Governance

June 6, 2025

In a time when quick progress is often seen as vital for economic growth, the introduction of Bills 5 (Better Municipal Governance Act) and 14 in Ontario, along with the federal Bill C-5 (One Canadian Economy Act), raises important concerns about how fast-tracking decisions can affect Indigenous rights and local governance. While these bills aim to streamline processes and promote economic development, the lack of meaningful consultation with Indigenous communities and other levels of government could undermine the very progress they intend to achieve.

At first glance, Bills 5 and C-5 seem to have similar goals, both designed to enhance economic growth and simplify decision-making. However, introducing federal and provincial legislation simultaneously can create confusion among those affected regarding their specific impacts and the consultation processes involved. In a competitive economy, the need to attract investment and create jobs is clear. Yet, rushing to put these laws in place without engaging with impacted communities creates an environment filled with tension and conflict.

News: Chiefs of Ontario decry lack of consultation on Bill C-5

May 29 2025

The main issue is that insufficient consultation can lead to significant problems. When Indigenous communities are not meaningfully involved in decisions that affect their lands and resources, they may feel excluded and distrustful of government actions. This can lead to protests and opposition, as seen with the planned rallies against Bills 5 and C-5. Additionally, failing to consult properly can result in legal challenges, as Indigenous leaders have indicated that they will take action if their rights are overlooked. This can delay projects and deepen historical tensions between Indigenous communities and governments.

Consultation is not just a legal obligation; it can also lead to better outcomes for everyone involved. Indigenous communities often have valuable knowledge about land management and environmental stewardship that can improve project results. Ignoring their input is not only unfair but can also hinder economic progress. Moreover, the urgency to pass these bills might come from a desire to avoid controversy, which can appear autocratic and alienate constituents who feel their voices are not valued. Good governance requires open dialogue and compromise.

News: Anishinabek Nation chief says he briefed Ontario police on protests against Bill 5

Series: Young Doug Ford

As Ontario faces the challenges of economic development, the need for genuine consultation with Indigenous communities and other stakeholders is more important than ever. The introduction of Bills 5 and 14, along with federal Bill C-5, reflects a push for progress, but without proper consultation, we risk damaging the trust and cooperation necessary for sustainable development. To build an economy that respects the rights and voices of all Canadians, both the Ontario government and the federal government must prioritize dialogue and compromise. Only through real engagement can we create a future that honours Indigenous rights and promotes a fair and prosperous society for everyone.

Tuesday June 10 2025

June 10, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday June 10 2025

Canada’s Bold Move: Strengthening Defense Amid Global Pressures

May 7, 2025

This week, Canada has taken a significant step in shaping its defence strategy as Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a $9 billion investment in military spending, with a commitment to meet NATO’s 2% GDP target this year. This decision reflects Canada’s dedication to strengthening its military capabilities in response to rising global tensions, particularly from countries like Russia and China, which have been expanding their military power. These challenges necessitate a robust defence posture from Canada.

News: Carney to announce Canada’s defence spending will hit NATO’s target of 2% of GDP this fiscal year, sources say

At the same time, Canada’s move is influenced by ongoing pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, who has been vocal about NATO allies increasing their defence budgets. Trump’s focus on military might is evident not only on the world stage but also at home, with his use of the National Guard to address protests and the upcoming military parade for his birthday. These actions highlight the expectation that allies like Canada share the burden of defence spending.

January 16, 2020

Interestingly, the pressure from Trump seems to echo the tactics used by leaders like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, who often wield their influence through displays of strength. For Canada, aligning with these demands means finding a balance between meeting international obligations and looking after national interests. Carney’s investment is not just a reaction to outside pressures; it’s a strategic move to ensure that Canada remains a capable and committed player on the global stage.

News: NATO to back 5% spending target in June, Secretary-General says

By focusing on enhancing military readiness and boosting the Canadian defence industry, Carney’s government aims to secure Canada’s future while maintaining its independence. This includes reforms in military procurement and the use of domestic resources like Canadian steel and aluminum, reducing reliance on the U.S., and strengthening ties with European allies.

As Canada takes this path, it’s important to support policies that reflect our values and commitment to security. This investment in defence will help ensure that Canada remains respected and influential in a world where power displays are on the rise.

A few thoughts about where we stand with our international security commitments. It’s no secret that Canada has been lagging in this area for a while now.

Our self-defence capabilities have weakened to the point where it’s hard to see how we can be a credible force in helping defend others when we can barely defend ourselves.

That said, I’m looking at Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent commitments with a lot of hope. I’m cautiously optimistic about this new leadership and what it could mean for our defence posture. It’s definitely about results at this point, and I’m hoping Carney can deliver.

It’s interesting timing, isn’t it? Just ahead of the G7 meeting we’re hosting and right before the big NATO summit where talk of spending is heating up from 2% to 5%. And let’s not forget, it’s Trump’s birthday week, culminating in that over-the-top military parade. It feels like we’re all putting on a bit of a show right now.

Friday June 6, 2025

June 6, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday June 6, 2025

Also printed in the Toronto Star. Published on Reddit.

Doug Ford’s Bill 17 – Yet Another Step Backwards for Ontario’s Future

May 29 2025

Doug Ford is at it again, pushing through Bill 17, the “Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act,” with the same disregard for environmental protections that characterized his earlier attempts to dismantle the Greenbelt. Ford seems unfazed by previous voter backlash, perhaps feeling invincible with a third majority government—never mind that it was supported by less than half of the voting populace. It seems apathy has its price, and in this case, it’s a mediocre government that prioritizes quick wins over genuine progress.

Bill 17 epitomizes Ford’s governance style: quick fixes, shortcuts, and a focus on appeasing developers and well-connected allies at the expense of everyday Ontarians. By overriding local green building standards, this bill undermines cities like Toronto and Hamilton, which have been proactive in setting their own climate benchmarks. This disregard for local needs could lead to higher emissions and weaker climate defences in new developments.

Analysis: Ford government moves to override cities on green building standards

November 13, 2020

Adding insult to injury, Bill 5 complements this approach by cutting Indigenous communities out of the consultation process. Ford’s administration seems to have little interest in meaningful engagement, opting instead for expediency over respecting Indigenous rights and fostering true reconciliation.

This isn’t Ford’s first run-in with environmental neglect. His track record includes cancelling the Green Energy Act and the cap-and-trade program, decisions that not only forfeited potential revenue but also missed opportunities for sustainable job creation. Ford’s approach mirrors a wider trend where governments, both in Canada and the U.S., are rolling back environmental protections. Ottawa’s recent rollback of the carbon tax/rebate program is yet another example of this troubling regression.

October 31, 2023

In Ontario, Ford’s frequent use of Ministerial Zoning Orders (MZOs) to fast-track development without public debate only further underscores his disdain for democratic processes. This tactic creates a shadowy parallel bureaucracy that lacks transparency and accountability.

The path Ford has chosen is one that turns back the clock on conservation and trivializes the impacts of climate change. It disenfranchises communities striving for sustainable growth. As Ontarians, we must demand better from our leaders. We deserve a government that values comprehensive reforms, respects environmental protections, and champions a sustainable future. Doug Ford’s Bill 17 and Bill 5 are steps in the wrong direction, and it’s crucial for the people of Ontario to demand more thoughtful and planet-focused policies.

Ford’s Familiar Tune

Here I am again, feeling like a broken record, lamenting yet another one of Doug Ford’s government’s anti-environmental moves. It seems like this is what we signed up for when less than half of the voting public handed him a third majority government. Sure, Ford played the Captain Canada role brilliantly, taking a strong stand against Trump earlier this year, and his dramatic flair continues to win him applause. But beneath that performative exterior, we’re stuck with the reality of what the next few years are likely to look like.

Ironically, Ford’s approach mirrors a “Trumpy” disregard for genuine consultation and environmental responsibility. It’s full steam ahead for his developer pals and provincial power brokers, with little concern for the impact on our planet. It’s almost amusing—almost—how he can be hailed as a brave critic of the U.S. President while simultaneously mirroring that same President’s approach when it comes to ignoring the climate crisis. It’s a frustrating echo, and one that I fear we’ll be hearing more of in the years to come.

Posted to Substack: Superhero of Developers. Please subscribe. It’s free!