mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Archives
  • DOWNLOADS
  • Kings & Queens
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • Prime Ministers
  • Special Features
  • The Boutique
  • Who?
  • Young Doug Ford
  • Presidents

controversy

Wednesday April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025 by Graeme MacKay
Paul Chiang's resignation amid controversy over foreign interference comments highlights leadership challenges for Mark Carney and the Liberal Party.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 2, 2025

A Leadership Misstep by Mark Carney and the Liberals

The final report on foreign interference in Canada reveals serious threats from various nations, yet it's the economic pressures from Trump's policies that unexpectedly drive Canada's political focus.

January 28, 2025

In the world of politics, perception is often as powerful as reality. The recent controversy surrounding Paul Chiang, the former Liberal candidate for Markham–Unionville, is a testament to this fact. Mark Carney’s decision not to immediately remove Chiang following his inflammatory comments about a Conservative rival reflects a troubling pattern of aloofness and indecision within the Liberal Party when it comes to addressing foreign interference, particularly from China.

Under Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party has been criticized for taking too long to address concerns about foreign interference. Despite mounting evidence and public concern, the party’s responses have often seemed slow and insufficient. This latest episode with Paul Chiang only reinforces that perception. By initially defending Chiang, Carney missed an opportunity to break from the past and demonstrate decisive leadership in the face of a serious issue.

Opinion: It is astonishing – and reprehensible – that Paul Chiang remains a Liberal candidate

June 2, 2023

Mark Carney’s actions, or lack thereof, have highlighted a critical perception problem. His reluctance to act decisively against Chiang after the latter’s comments about turning a political opponent over to Chinese authorities suggests a continuation of past Liberal practices. This perception of aloofness and indecision does little to inspire confidence in a party facing an election where leadership and integrity are paramount.

Interestingly, an Abacus poll taken at the start of the election showed that concern for Chinese election interference ranked low among Canadians, not even making the top 10 list of issues. Instead, concerns about the cost of living, Donald Trump, healthcare, and housing took precedence. However, the Chiang controversy may thrust foreign interference back into the spotlight, challenging the Liberals to address it more robustly.

Polling: The Opinion Landscape in Canada Continues to Shift

February 25, 2023

On the eve of Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day,” the timing of this controversy could not be worse for the Liberals. While the issue may not have long-lasting legs, it represents a self-inflicted wound – a dumb move that could have been easily avoided with more decisive action. Carney’s failure to act swiftly and decisively against Chiang may not only hurt the party’s image but also cast doubt on his ability to lead effectively.

Moving forward, the Liberals, under Mark Carney’s leadership, must demonstrate a more proactive and transparent approach to foreign interference. This is not just about addressing past criticisms but about building a foundation of trust and integrity for the future. In a political landscape where the perception of leadership is critical, Carney and the Liberals must learn from this misstep and show Canadians that they are committed to protecting the nation’s democratic processes.

News: Liberal candidate Paul Chiang resigns over Chinese bounty comments

November 20, 2020

The fallout from Paul Chiang’s comments serves as a reminder that leadership requires more than rhetoric; it demands decisive action. Mark Carney and the Liberal Party must recognize this and adapt if they are to regain the trust of Canadians and effectively navigate the challenges ahead.


Liberation Day

Today’s message is a bit of a housekeeping note. For months, I’ve been sending out these daily messages along with an animated version of my editorial cartoon, while also keeping up with my regular activities. Honestly, I don’t think many people are seeing them. Figuring out how to use this platform between notes and posts has been a bit frustrating.

Yesterday was a beautiful day, with bright colours and Spring smells returning to nature in my part of the western hemisphere. Instead of following my usual routine, I decided to go outside and enjoy the fresh air. I encourage you all to do the same if you can.

I also made a personal change by deactivating my Facebook accounts yesterday. After 17 years with a personal page and an editorial cartoon page that had 6,000 followers, I felt it was time to step back. Will the tech giants notice I’m gone? No. But it has already given me more time and less distraction. Happy Liberation Day!

Here’s the animated version of my editorial cartoon for today:

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2025-07, Canada, controversy, election, foreign, integrity, interference, leadership, Liberal, Mark Carney, Paul Chiang, perception, public, resignation, security, Substack, transparency

Friday February 14, 2025

February 14, 2025 by Graeme MacKay
Doug Ford, "Captain Canada," charms Ontario voters despite pressing provincial issues, leading to strong poll numbers ahead of the election.

February 14, 2025

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday February 14, 2025 (also, The Toronto Star.)

Ontario’s Valentine’s Day Love Affair with Doug Ford

Trudeau and Ford agree on $3.1 billion for healthcare, tackling hospital issues. Meanwhile, Jagmeet Singh pushes for a national drug plan after Trudeau gives in on dental care. It's a political contrast before Valentine's Day.

February 14, 2024

As Valentine’s Day casts its romantic glow across Ontario, it seems the province has found its unlikely suitor in Doug Ford, affectionately dubbed “Captain Canada.” Despite a landscape dotted with pressing issues—from crumbling healthcare to overcrowded classrooms—Ford’s charm offensive has successfully wooed a significant portion of the electorate.

Much like a well-timed bouquet of roses, Ford’s early election call appears to have enchanted voters. With his strong stance against the Trump Tariffs and his portrayal as Ontario’s steadfast protector, Ford has captivated hearts, even as the province faces shortages of doctors and nurses, overcrowded emergency rooms, and inadequate mental healthcare. These challenges, alongside reduced college funding and a lack of affordable housing, seem to fade into the background in the face of Ford’s allure.

Poll: Here’s the top election issue for Ontario voters, according to a Nanos survey

Ford’s courtship of Ontarians has been nothing short of strategic. From $200 cheques appearing in mailboxes to the liberation of alcohol regulations, he’s offered sweet gestures that resonate with everyday voters. Meanwhile, controversies like the redevelopment of Ontario Place and the Greenbelt scheme are overshadowed by his narrative as a defender against external threats.

Yet, as with any romance, there are those who remain skeptical, wary of the long-term implications of this political dalliance. Critics point to sweetheart deals, wasteful spending, and privatization as causes for concern—issues that might be ignored in the throes of infatuation but could have lasting repercussions.

As election day approaches, the question looms: Will Ontario’s voters solidify their love for “Captain Canada,” or will they awaken from the spell, casting their ballots for a divided opposition? With voter turnout on the decline, the risk remains that those not enamoured by Ford’s charm may not make their voices heard, leaving the province’s future in the hands of those who do.

February 14, 2018

Happy Valentine’s Day, Ontario. In this season of love, it seems you’ve been seduced by a political Casanova. Whether this romance will lead to a happily ever after or a dramatic breakup remains to be seen, but one thing is certain—Doug Ford’s charm has left an indelible mark on the hearts and minds of the province.


Dougie Ford’s Love Letter to Ontario Voters:

Roses are red, Ontario’s blue,

With a $200 cheque, I’m wooing you.

Healthcare’s a challenge,

but I’ll stand tall,

As “Captain Canada,” I’ll answer the call.

Trump’s tariffs loom, yet I’m your knight,

Fighting for jobs, I’ll make it right.

Though classrooms are crowded and housing’s tight,

I’ll charm you with changes, both day and night.

Alcohol’s flowing, and spirits are high,

In this grand seduction, give me a try.

So on this Valentine’s, let’s seal our fate,

With your love and support,

we’ll make Ontario great!

— Sir A.I. Edmund Spenser

Please enjoy the February 14, 2024 making-of animated editorial cartoon below.  Posts come out every Saturday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. If you like my editorial cartoons and animations, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. A lot of work goes into these cartoons and commentary — Best of all, it’s free!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Posted in: Ontario Tagged: 2025-04, Captain Canada, charm, controversy, Doug Ford, Economy, election, healthcare, issues, Ontario, OntElection2025, seduction, Substack, tariffs, valentines day, voters

Thursday March 20, 2024

March 21, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Amidst evolving global challenges, Canada must prioritize aiding Ukraine's defence against Russian aggression while also providing crucial humanitarian assistance to address the famine crisis in Palestine.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 20, 2024

Canada Must Prioritize Defending Ukraine and Supporting Palestine: A Call to Action

Amid the escalating global tensions spurred by Vladimir Putin's threat, Canada responds passively, contrasting with the proactive efforts of Baltic nations and the UK, underscoring the urgency for Canada to match diplomatic initiatives with a more assertive and holistic approach to address the evolving security landscape.

January 31, 2024

In recent months, the world has witnessed two crises of immense proportions: the relentless assault on Ukraine by Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe facing Palestinians in Gaza. As Canada grapples with its role in addressing these urgent challenges, it is imperative that we reassess our priorities and shift resources towards resisting Putin’s aggression while offering much-needed aid and support to Palestine.

News: Trudeau government to stop sending arms to Israel once details are worked out, Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly says  

Canada's hesitant response to the Gaza-Israel conflict signals diminishing influence, urging a need for principled leadership and meaningful diplomacy to regain its historical role in promoting peace.

February 16, 2026

The decision by the Trudeau government to cease arms exports to Israel represents a step in the right direction. It acknowledges the need to reassess our relationship with countries engaged in conflicts that perpetuate human suffering. However, as we take this crucial step, we must also recognize the pressing need to confront the brutal actions of Putin’s regime in Ukraine.

The conflict in Ukraine has reached a critical juncture, with reports indicating that Ukrainian forces are facing catastrophic shortages of ammunition and air defences. As Putin continues his ruthless campaign to expand Russia’s borders, it is incumbent upon Canada to stand in solidarity with the Ukrainian people and provide the support they need to defend their sovereignty and territorial integrity.

News: US estimates Ukraine military shortages could grow catastrophic by late March

This support must go beyond mere words of condemnation. Canada has a moral obligation to act decisively in defence of democracy and freedom in Ukraine. This means redirecting resources previously allocated for arms sales to Israel towards bolstering Ukraine’s defence capabilities. It means providing military aid, training, and logistical support to ensure that Ukrainian forces have the tools they need to resist Putin’s aggression.

Extreme political polarization, exemplified by internal dissent over Canada's stance on the Israel-Hamas conflict and Ukraine, not only risks eroding bipartisan support for crucial international causes but also undermines the global fight for democracy in the face of complex geopolitical challenges.

December 14, 2023

At the same time, Canada cannot turn a blind eye to the dire humanitarian situation facing Palestinians in Gaza. The recent escalation of violence has only exacerbated an already dire situation, with reports of widespread famine and suffering among the civilian population. As a nation committed to upholding human rights and dignity, Canada must step up its efforts to provide humanitarian aid and support to the people of Palestine.

This does not mean neglecting Ukraine or prioritizing one crisis over another. Rather, it requires a nuanced and balanced approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of these crises and the need for Canada to play a proactive role in addressing them both.

The intensifying Israel-Hamas conflict strains the historic US-Israel alliance, with President Biden expressing reservations about Prime Minister Netanyahu's conduct, while opposition leader Yair Lapid delicately navigates diplomatic ties with Senate Democrats, underscoring the intricate challenges facing US-Israel relations amid the ongoing crisis.

December 20, 2023

By shifting resources towards resisting Putin’s aggression in Ukraine while offering food, aid, and support to Palestine, Canada can demonstrate its commitment to upholding human rights, promoting peace, and confronting tyranny wherever it may arise. Now is the time for Canada to take bold and decisive action in defence of freedom and justice around the world. The Ukrainian people and the Palestinians are counting on us.


The Vital Role of Satire in Upholding Democratic Values

In response to the recent demand for an apology by HonestReporting Canada regarding the above editorial cartoon published by The Hamilton Spectator and The Waterloo Record, it is crucial to address the misconceptions and unfounded accusations put forth by the complainant.

The letters to the editor published in The Hamilton Spectator were inspired by a very active lobby group that advocates on behalf of Israel’s government. It’s evident from the letter writers’ addresses, Scarborough, Montreal, and Toronto that these are not usual readers of this newspaper. Instead of working to point out true acts of intolerance, orchestrated pile ons such as these are aimed to gaslight editorial cartoonists and columnists into submission, to self-censor, and to stifle opinion.  

Firstly, the demand for an apology stems from a gross misinterpretation of the purpose and nature of editorial cartoons. These cartoons serve as a form of satire, a fundamental aspect of free expression in democratic societies. Satire often employs exaggeration and caricature to highlight social and political issues, including the actions of political leaders and governments. It is not meant to be taken literally, but rather as a means of commentary and critique.

My editorial cartoon in question, depicts Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Russian President Vladimir Putin engaged in military actions, juxtaposed with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s announcement that Canada was halting arms sales to Israel. My mission as an editorial cartoonist includes observing Canada’s place in global affairs, and last week’s vote by Parliament to suspend arms shipments to the Netanyahu government was significant and warranted reaction. While the cartoon may appear provocative to some, its intention is clear: to comment on current events and political decisions in a satirical manner.

By Serge Chapleau. The true outrage is how veteran cartoonists get away with appropriating photographs in editorial cartoons. That needs to stop! Scroll down more about this cartoon below.

Furthermore, it is essential to recognize the pattern of silencing criticism of Netanyahu and the Israeli government by groups like HonestReporting Canada. Any form of dissent or critique is often met with accusations of antisemitism or defamation, effectively stifling open dialogue and debate. It is not the first time my cartoons have been baselessly targeted for being anti-Israel, or antisemitic. This tactic not only undermines the principles of free speech but also shields those in power from accountability and scrutiny.

The assertion that the cartoon constitutes antisemitism or promotes falsehoods about Israel’s actions is unsubstantiated and misleading. Criticizing the policies of a government, including Israel’s, does not equate to antisemitism. It is essential to differentiate between legitimate criticism of government actions and bigotry towards a particular group of people. One can can stand on humanitarian grounds demanding Hamas release the Israeli hostages, while at the same time demand the end of senseless killing of innocent Palestinian lives.

The complaint article also attempts to downplay the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the disproportionate impact of the conflict on Palestinian civilians. It is crucial to acknowledge the complexities of the situation, including the role of Hamas, a designated terrorist organization, in perpetuating violence and exploiting the suffering of civilians for political gain. Ignoring these realities only serves to undermine efforts towards a peaceful resolution and perpetuates misinformation.

Finally, satirical portrayals of Justin Trudeau or Pierre Poilievre are not anti-Canada, nor is a lampoon of Joe Biden or Donald Trump, anti-American. An editorial cartoon that ridicules a leader of Israel is not anti-Israel commentary. 

January 27, 2024 – Spiked due to self censorship

The demand for an apology from The Hamilton Spectator and The Waterloo Record is baseless and undermines the principles of free expression and critical discourse essential to a democratic society. Editorial cartoons play a vital role in fostering public debate and holding power to account, and attempts to censor or silence them must be vehemently opposed.

HonestReporting Canada should redirect its efforts towards more constructive dialogue by effectively addressing instances of antisemitism where they genuinely exist, rather than attempting to silence editorial cartoonists where no antisemitism is present. By promoting understanding and tolerance rather than resorting to censorship and division, HonestReporting Canada can play a more meaningful role in fostering productive discourse and advancing genuine efforts towards peace and mutual respect. – Graeme MacKay


Letter to the Editor, The Waterloo Record, Saturday March 23, 2024 

Cartoon missed the mark 

I must protest the horrible cartoon you published on Thursday’s Opinion page, which totally misrepresents the truth in Gaza and Israel.

War is always ugly and terrible, but let’s get the facts straight! And stop these malignant caricatures!

I hope I will see an apology very soon.

Yosef Abramczyk, Montreal


Promote messages of tolerance – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

For our community, the recent cancellation of the Hamilton Jewish Film Festival at the Playhouse Cinema echoed a distressing past reminiscent of Kristallnacht, which marked the start of widespread boycotts against Jews. Within this environment, I was filled with despair by the recent anti-Israel political cartoon of Graeme MacKay, published in The Hamilton Spectator. The abhorrent image stirred the memories of blood libels and was reminiscent of the antisemitic propaganda of Der Stürmer.

During these difficult times, when antisemitism is rearing its ugly and pernicious head, our community is in dire need of responsible leadership and a media presence that does not perpetuate antisemitic tropes. Our local media has a responsibility to foster coexistence rather than echoing the darkest chapters of history.

The Hamilton Spectator must take a stand against such narratives and promote a message of tolerance and inclusivity. It is crucial, now more than ever, that we learn from the past and commit to a future where all members of our community feel safe, respected and valued.

Daniel Green, rabbi of Adas Israel Congregation


Appalled and dismayed– Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

I am appalled and dismayed at your having decided to include in your March 21 publication the disgusting and misinformed cartoon produced by Graeme MacKay which equates the wars in Gaza and Ukraine and which depicts Israel as deliberately targeting innocent civilians and as being the main cause of Palestinian hunger and suffering.

Jeffrey Sugar, Scarborough


Shocked to see cartoon – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

We are shocked that you would allow such an antisemitic cartoon in our paper in our city that has a large Jewish population. We trust you will apologize and not be so one-sided and research the truth of the conflict.

Bill and Judi Moffat, Burlington


Cartoon was shameful – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

I must protest the cartoon you published, which totally misrepresents the truth in Gaza and Israel in a horrible, horrible way. Shame on you! Shame on the cartoonist! It’s not for me to demand any apology, but if you have any decency, I hope you will apologize.

Yosef Abramczyk, Montreal


Cartoon was offensive – Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Monday March 25, 2024

How could you publish an editorial cartoon depicting Israel as committing state-sponsored terrorism against innocent Palestinian civilians? Factually wrong and offensive.

Esther M. Cantor, Toronto


Serge Chapleau’s recent cartoon depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a vampire has sparked heated controversy, with accusations of antisemitism echoing through the halls of public discourse. However, amidst the uproar, it’s crucial to recognize the vital role of political satire in challenging power structures and fostering critical dialogue.

At its core, Chapleau’s cartoon is a scathing commentary on Netanyahu’s leadership and policies, particularly in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By portraying Netanyahu as a vampire, Chapleau cleverly taps into the symbolism of vampirism, depicting a figure who metaphorically drains resources and perpetuates conflict. This metaphorical portrayal is a hallmark of political satire, aiming to provoke thought and discussion rather than perpetuate hate.

Critics argue that the vampire imagery evokes antisemitic tropes, drawing parallels to historical propaganda. However, it’s essential to distinguish between legitimate criticism of a political figure and bigotry. Chapleau’s cartoon does not target Netanyahu or Jewish people as a whole based on their ethnicity or religion. Instead, it targets Netanyahu’s actions and policies as a public figure, which are subject to scrutiny and critique like any other leader.

Furthermore, the Association of Canadian Cartoonists rightly points out that caricaturing world leaders is a common practice, and Netanyahu should not be exempt from such scrutiny. Satire serves as a check on power, holding leaders accountable for their decisions and behaviours. In this light, Chapleau’s cartoon is a bold assertion of free speech and artistic expression, essential pillars of democratic societies.

Someone who gets satire!

Moreover, the notion that Chapleau’s cartoon is inherently antisemitic ignores the nuanced context in which it was created. Chapleau himself has stated that he did not intend any antisemitic connotations with his cartoon. Instead, he aimed to use striking imagery to make a powerful statement about Netanyahu’s leadership. As such, accusations of antisemitism risk diluting the significance of genuine instances of bigotry and discrimination.

While Chapleau’s cartoon may be provocative and controversial, it serves a vital purpose in challenging authority and fostering public debate. Rather than stifling dissent, we should embrace satire as a tool for social commentary and reflection. By engaging with Chapleau’s cartoon in a thoughtful and critical manner, we can move beyond knee-jerk reactions and confront the complex issues it raises with nuance and empathy. (Graeme MacKay)

On April 6, 2024 an opinion piece by yours truly, Graeme MacKay, was printed in the Hamilton Spectator in answer to the fallout from this editorial cartoon.

 

 

Posted in: Canada, International Tagged: 2024-06, antisemitism, arms, Benjamin Netanyahu, Canada, controversy, famine, food, Gaza, Honest Reporting, Israel, Justin Trudeau, letter, Palestine, Russia, starvation, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, Volodymr Zelenskyy

Friday February 15, 2019

February 22, 2019 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday February 15, 2019

High-stakes war of words between Trudeau, Wilson-Raybould on tap

In the wake of Jody Wilson-Raybould’s resignation from Justin Trudeau’s cabinet, a war of words between the prime minister and his former attorney general seems inevitable. If the developments of the past few days are any indication, it could get ugly.

February 13, 2017

Wilson-Raybould would hardly have resigned if her interpretation of the interaction she had with the Prime Minister’s Office over the handling of the criminal prosecution on corruption charges of engineering giant SNC-Lavalin matched Trudeau’s.

She would not be seeking legal advice as to how much, if anything, she can disclose from former Supreme Court justice Thomas Cromwell if she were not exploring the option of giving her version of events.

April 3, 2012
Justin Trudeau wins charity boxing match
Liberal MP Justin Trudeau beat Conservative Senator Patrick Brazeau in their charity boxing match in Ottawa Saturday night.

As an aside, Cromwell’s credentials can only make the advice Wilson-Raybould acts on harder to challenge either by the government — should the former SCOC justice lay out a legal rationale for her to speak up — or by the opposition parties if he advises her to remain silent.

In hindsight, Wilson-Raybould is probably congratulating herself for seeking top-notch legal advice.

Judging from the prime minister’s reaction to her resignation, Trudeau and his team are in a take-no-prisoners mood.

February 9, 2019

To listen to the prime minister on Tuesday, one would have been hard-pressed to find any lingering sign of the pride that attended Wilson-Raybould’s appointment as Canada’s first Indigenous attorney general three years ago. Hers was not a run-of — the-mill cabinet casting call.

Back in 2015, her elevation was seen as a powerful signal of the depth of Trudeau’s commitment to reconciliation with Canada’s Indigenous peoples. 

But on Tuesday, the picture he painted of his former minister was anything but flattering. Trudeau questioned her integrity. He said her actions were at odds with their private conversations. He might as well have called Wilson-Raybould a loose cannon. (Continued: Hamilton Spectator)  


Autopsy of a Twitter Pile-on

Embarking on this investigation it is necessary to remind us all with a simple statement:

NOT ALL EDITORIAL CARTOONS ARE MEANT TO BE FUNNY

However, given the state of editorial cartooning in recent years, especially in North America, it’s not at all surprising that readers have come to always expect a funny gag to elicit a chortle or smile at the expense of a divisive politician. Think Donald Trump.

Sometimes the easiest path for some editorial cartoonists to take is to spread the laughter around equally with the aren’t-all-our-politicians-stupid gags. Though increasingly, editorial cartoon comedy has moved out of the realm of politics, and replaced by not so hard hitting commentary on crazy weather, sports, entertainment, or any other non-political arena which will offend the least sensibilities.  On editorial pages across the spectrum, newspaper editors without staff cartoonists, will often opt to run syndicated cartoons which will offend the least number of readers thereby ensuring their daily routine won’t be interrupted by irate phone calls. Sadly, a rising number of newspapers have done away with editorial cartoons, running photos, or more text in their traditional boxes.

All this said, one would think the above statement goes without saying given the popularity of editorial cartoons which pull at heartstrings. Whether it’s editorial cartoon commentary on the passing of famous personality entering the pearly gates, a feel good Hallmark card cartoon greeting on any given calendar holiday, or a tear provoking editorial cartoon following headline tragedies in the news. People should understand that editorial cartoons, watered down to provoke emotion, aren’t always meant to be funny.

So here’s another statement :

EDITORIAL CARTOONS MAKE PEOPLE ANGRY

They’re also supposed to make people think. Not in a long time has a cartoon of mine garnered as much attention on Twitter – critical comments, yet a sizeable number of likes & retweets, here, and along with a similar cartoon drawn by Michael de Adder here.

The above editorial cartoon certainly demonstrated that fact.  With orchestrated social media outrage and offence clouding logical thought and spreading like a virus designed to manipulate and whip up anger using tangents unrelated to the point of the satire. One would think it easily conveys to readers a classic scenario of power oppressing the afflicted. In order to depict the power imposing its will on the oppressed, a cartoonist sometimes has to draw uncomfortable images to convey the message.

Despite references to gag metaphors in the media to describe the situation demoted cabinet minister Jody Wilson-Raybould presently finds herself, being unable to give her account due to Solicitor-client privilege as federal Attorney-General in the SNC-Lavalin affair, the illustrated depiction of that situation was evidently too much for some readers to stomach. 

I get it. This cartoon has caused anger. It’s especially galling to supporters of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He rode into office with overwhelming support, on a feminist mandate, to improve Ottawa’s relations with indigenous peoples, and to bring about greater government openness and transparency (and as a bonus, his boxing prowess, capitalized by his supporters, is in full ridiculous view.) The cartoon exposes perceived breaches on all those fronts. His brand is under attack and the mounting doubts and speculation because of it could send the Liberal Party’s House of Commons seat count downward after the coming Federal election. While many obviously understand this message, others are lashing out giving their own misunderstood definitions of what satire is:

…And just attacking the editorial cartoonist: 

Which is fine. I, like all other editorial cartoonists, have been called everything from all sides of the political spectrum.

Sure, some people might think that they appreciate satire, it only works for them if the satire isn’t exposing the folly of their political heroes. What is worrying is the growing trend by readers to spread false accusations, to report or clamp down on satire, whenever they feel offended by an editorial cartoon. This is particularly true of the toxicity that spreads on a platform like Twitter.

This one takes the absolute cake for wrangling in the RCMP, as if Canada were some police state, while making a mockery of actual hate and violence promotion. 

Long gone are the #JeSuisCharlie hashtags when people added their supposed support for satire with fingers clicking the mouses, but not actually understanding what satire actually is. Despite the articles, the panel discussions, the in-depth primers on the long history of the craft and the importance of freedom of expression, the actual term “freedom of expression” is being used in a pejorative way on university campuses, and elsewhere, worldwide.  

The sad reality is, it’s having an effect, made evident by the fact that editorial cartoonist positions at newspapers are in fast decline. It’s not helped when those in journalism, politics, and academia thrash about demonstrating willful ignorance of satire, opting to join a chorus of virtue signallers feigning outrage on unrelated tangents which have nothing to do with the message in the editorial cartoon.

Godwin’s Law was invoked to the writer of that last doozy. Just for the record, at least one account holder was reported for threatening violence and had their account placed on suspension.  A stiff 7 day cooling off period ought to give offenders a taste of a world without Twitter.

Eventually, every political movement comes to an end to be replaced by another. The pendulum swings. Some day Justin Trudeau will be gone and his party will be replaced by another. Politics will always be around, but the trends show that with the demise of print media, satire in the form of editorial cartoons will be watered down to irrelevance, unless the easily offended aren’t resisted.

There are countless expressions humans have to express freedom of expression, but a particular one that guides me is:

Hate the cartoon, dislike the cartoonist, but do not impose your own decree on what cartooning is intended to be. 


Update – Monday February 18, 2019

My colleague Michael de Adder opted to apologize for his cartoon.

 

Yes, I’m well aware of his apology – @deAdder and I are good friends. Unfortunately his decision is due to the toxic nature of Twitter that forces free-expressionists to bow to faux-outrage & virtue signalling pressure to self-censor.

— Graeme MacKay (@mackaycartoons) February 18, 2019

 

The above cartoon is cited in this Huffington Post article. The Comments section are overwhelmingly supportive of the points expressed in this cartoon, and those drawn by other editorial cartoonists. An acknowledgement of thanks goes out to the many likes, retweets, and comments in support of the cartoon on Twitter.

Also, as of this afternoon, Gerald Butts, resigned his position as Chief of Staff to the Prime Minister. The plot thickens. 

Update – Wednesday February 20, 2019

Trudeau said he apologized to Jody Wilson-Raybould in caucus:

“I wasn’t quick enough to condemn in unequivocal terms the comments and commentary and cartoons made about her last week, they were absolutely unacceptable and I should have done it sooner.”

 Update – Sunday February 24, 2019

The Clerk of the Privy Council has registered his own disgust at at least one of the cartoons, although he didn’t specify which one.  Speaking about Jody Wilson-Raybourn, Michael Wernick testified at the House Justice Committee, stating:

“She was the decider, the full and final decider. She can’t be the fettered solicitor and battered decider in that horrible, vile cartoon, at the same time. It’s one or the other.”

More write-ups appeared. A rambling piece sympathetic to Michael de Adder’s apology for his cartoon, and another one from Canada’s far right Rebel blasting him for caving in. Here’s a nice analysis summary of the week that was.

On the Canadaland podcast, an interview show about media, host Jesse Brown devoted much of the show unpacking the protest convoy, better known as “United we Roll”, which I drew on.  Then, changing subject to the SNC-Lavalin scandal, at the 38:08 mark, Jesse feigns sympathy for “these poor son-of-a-bitch editorial cartoonists”, ironically, as he panders to a feminist guest about inferred misogyny, “…they’re not good cartoons.”

Gee, thanks, Jesse.

Update – March 2, 2019

CBC’s The National highlighted “cartoons that crossed the line” in the second segment of its Friday night broadcast. This cartoon closed out the report:



“The Global News article notes that Michael was not the only cartoonist to portray the situation in a controversial fashion.”


Letters to the Editor, Hamilton Spectator, February 21, 2019

Cartoon warrants an apology  RE: Feb. 15 editorial cartoon

As a long time subscriber to The Hamilton Spectator I was appalled to see Graeme MacKay’s cartoon and equally disappointed that you made the decision to print it.

That Mr. MacKay views violence against women as amusing and worthy of drawing this disgusting cartoon and The Spectator’s decision to print it, given the alarming statistics regarding VAW and femicide in this country is inexcusable.

I would expect an apology.

Barbara Howe, Hamilton

Cartoon hit the mark  RE: Feb. 15 editorial cartoon

Good for you, for this cartoon that exposes Justin Trudeau for what he really is. He calls himself a feminist, but he is really just another white male bully who thinks nothing of oppressing the views of women, in this case of Jody Wilson-Raybould. Thanks for putting this hypocrisy front and centre.

J.D. Peltier, Hamilton


In the aftermath of the shuffle, it was the fact that racist tropes would be trotted out, without a recognition of the racism, that really upset me. For example, there were cartoons of me bound and gagged with the Prime Minister being egged on to beat me, which is completely inappropriate given the reality of murdered and missing Indigenous women and girls (MMIWG); another had me knocked out by the Prime Minister in a boxing ring; there was also one of me dressed like an Indigenous person wearing stereotypical “buckskin” clothes and feathers in my hair. Together, they showed me how far we still had to go as a country. That I truly was the “Indian” in the Cabinet. Separate. Apart. Different. And expendable, when not playing their game in their way. As Indigenous peoples have always been treated by governments in this country.

But here is one thing about the sexist, racist tropes that were trotted out against me: They didn’t accomplish much. In fact, I think they backfired. Far more people called out these pernicious acts than engaged in them. Those who knew me spoke out – Indigenous leaders and those who had worked with me; staff and others. But there were also so many I had never met who were just not having it. This included a lot of the media, who didn’t buy the incompetence narrative that started the second I was shuffled. In fact, some in the media even apologized for their early reporting, and they deserve credit for this. 

Excerpt from “Indian in the Cabinet”, by Jody Wilson Raybould, printed in The Globe and Mail, Saturday September 18, 2021

 

Posted in: Canada, Cartooning Tagged: 2019-06, boxing, cartooning, controversy, Daily Cartoonist, Feedback, freedom of expression, gagged, JodyWilson-Raybould, Justin Trudeau, SNC-Lavalin, social media, twitter

Saturday April 14, 2012

April 14, 2012 by Graeme MacKay

By Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator, Saturday April 14, 2012

F-35 Stooges

Directed by brothers Peter Farrelly and Bobby Farrelly, the 20th Century Fox movie brings back the beloved trio, this time starring Chris Diamantopoulos, Will Sasso and Sean Hayes in the roles of Moe, Curly and Larry respectively.

In the comedy, the brothers are trying to save their childhood orphanage and inadvertently stumble into a murder plot and wind up starring in a reality TV show. The cast also includes Jane Lynch, Sofia Vergara, Jennifer Hudson and Larry David.

The Three Stooges is projected to do well at the box office; it’s estimated that the film will earn $15 million on opening weekend. At the moment, the movie is averaging a 43 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes. (Source: Hollywood Reporter) 

Meanwhile the F-35 controversy continues with a couple key figures: Defence Minister Peter MacKay — Canada’s defence minister since 2007, MacKay has positioned himself as a strong supporter of the military. MacKay announced the government’s plans to purchase 65 F-35s to much fanfare in July 2010, and he has continued to point out that the F-35 is the only stealth fighter available to Canada even after other ministers began softening their support for the plane. The project was taken out of his hands and given to Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino last May as cost overruns and delays mounted. Opposition parties have been demanding his resignation.

Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino — Prime Minister Stephen Harper charged Fantino with overseeing all military procurement following the federal election last May. After initially refusing to publicly admit concerns with the F-35’s development, Fantino admitted last month that the government had not closed the door on the possibility Canada will walk away from the stealth fighter. Internal documents show he has been quietly raising concerns about the project with Lockheed Martin and other partner nations. (Source: Vancouver Sun)

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 3 stooges, Canada, controversy, F-35, fighter, Julian Fantino, military, Peter MacKay, purchase, Stephen Harper, stooge, Three Stooges
1 2 Next »

Please note…

This website contains satirical commentaries of current events going back several decades. Some readers may not share this sense of humour nor the opinions expressed by the artist. To understand editorial cartoons it is important to understand their effectiveness as a counterweight to power. It is presumed readers approach satire with a broad minded foundation and healthy knowledge of objective facts of the subjects depicted.

  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Toronto Star
  • The Globe & Mail
  • The National Post
  • Graeme on T̶w̶i̶t̶t̶e̶r̶ ̶(̶X̶)̶
  • Graeme on F̶a̶c̶e̶b̶o̶o̶k̶
  • Graeme on T̶h̶r̶e̶a̶d̶s̶
  • Graeme on Instagram
  • Graeme on Substack
  • Graeme on Bluesky
  • Graeme on Pinterest
  • Graeme on YouTube
New and updated for 2025
  • HOME
  • MacKaycartoons Inc.
  • The Boutique
  • The Hamilton Spectator
  • The Association of Canadian Cartoonists
  • The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists
  • You Might be From Hamilton if…
  • Young Doug Ford
  • MacKay’s Most Viral Cartoon
  • Intellectual Property Thief Donkeys
  • Wes Tyrell
  • Martin Rowson
  • Guy Bado’s Blog
  • National Newswatch
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design

Brand New Designs!

Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Archives

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

Social media & sharing icons powered by UltimatelySocial
 

Loading Comments...