priorities – mackaycartoons

Friday April 24, 2026

April 24, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday April 24, 2026

Also printed in The Toronto Star. Published in The Week.

Arch of Discord: Trump’s Legacy Overshadows Priorities

October 23 2025

As the world grapples with pressing issues like the Ukraine conflict, the Strait of Hormuz crisis, and a global cost-of-living surge, President Donald Trump remains fixated on his legacy. His latest endeavour—a triumphal arch in Washington, D.C.—has drawn widespread criticism for its scale and symbolism.

News: Donnyland’? Ukraine Proposes Naming Part of the Donbas in Trump’s Honor.

The proposed arch, intended to surpass Paris’ Arc de Triomphe, has faced backlash from preservationists and the public. Critics argue that it disrupts the visual harmony of the capital’s historic landscape, overshadowing monuments like the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. The project, perceived as a personal monument to Trump’s ego, raises questions about its appropriateness and alignment with American values.

Despite nearly unanimous public opposition, the Commission of Fine Arts, filled with Trump loyalists, seems poised to approve the project. This highlights a troubling trend of sidelining public discourse in favour of personal agendas. Trump’s focus on grandiose projects like this arch and a new White House ballroom reflects a prioritization of personal legacy over pressing national and international challenges.

Analysis: A Landscape Architect Reviews Trump’s Proposed Triumphal Arch

In a time when leadership should be focused on diplomacy and resolving crises, this arch stands as a testament to misplaced priorities. It risks setting a precedent where monumental decisions are driven by vanity rather than the collective values and needs of the nation. As Trump pushes forward, the question remains: Is this the legacy future generations should inherit?

Source: Wikipedia.

Dare to Ignore the Past…

All this talk of Donald Trump and his arch that has stirred laughter and mockery had me thinking of another arch from a bygone era that provoked controversy, one I doubt the incurious President or his ill informed yes men would know about. Designed by Decimus Burton as a triumphal gateway commemorating Britain’s Napoleonic victories and as a grand ceremonial entrance to the royal parks, it was built between 1826 and 1830 at Hyde Park Corner and was known simply as the triumphal arch. The name shifted to the Duke of Wellington’s Arch as public and press association with Wellington’s Napoleonic leadership attached his name and political symbolism to it.

Despite some of his faults, including a notorious temper, political obstinacy and an autocratic manner, a glorious archway bearing the Duke’s name seemed warranted. In 1846, however, Matthew Cotes Wyatt’s gigantic equestrian statue of Wellington was perched atop the arch and that excess exposed how glorification can go too far: critics attacked its scale and poor fit with Burton’s design, Queen Victoria complained it blocked the view of Buckingham Palace and cartoonists mocked it in Punch.

The Duke died in 1852, and despite criticism it remained on the arch until 1882 because of public attachment, political sensitivity about slighting the duke, bureaucratic delays, and the cost and difficulty of removal. The unpopular Wyatt statue was removed from Hyde Park Corner and re‑erected at Aldershot in 1885. The move defused royal and public complaints, found an Army sponsor, and eased disposal costs. The Prince of Wales, the future Edward VII, backed and helped secure the relocation. After the move to Aldershot the bronze suffered neglect, weathering and some vandal damage. It was later cleaned, repaired and treated by specialists to stabilize and protect it.

Photo Credit: Tripadvisor; Friends of Aldershot; Equestrian Statues

Wellington’s Arch caused quite a stir back in the day, and it’s a good lesson for us now. The new arch planned for the 250th anniversary looks more like a monument to Donald Trump’s ego than a celebration of independence. While he might see himself as a great leader like Wellington or Napoleon, his actions, especially ignoring environmental issues and stirring up global tensions, don’t really deserve a hero’s welcome. Just like the fuss over Wellington’s statue, this new plan should be checked out carefully to make sure it brings people together instead of just pumping up one person’s image.

Saturday April 18, 2026

April 18, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday April 18, 2026

Air Ford One: Soaring Above Ontario’s Needs

March 8, 2019

In a time when Ontario faces pressing issues in healthcare, education, and affordability, Premier Doug Ford’s decision to purchase a $28.9 million Bombardier Challenger 650 jet is a glaring misstep. This move signals a disconnect from the realities faced by everyday Ontarians and raises serious questions about government priorities.

The purchase of a private jet, dubbed “Air Ford One,” comes when Ontario’s hospitals are understaffed, education funding is strained, and over a million people rely on food banks. The $28.9 million price tag could have been directed towards frontline services that directly impact the lives of citizens. Instead, it has been allocated to a luxury aircraft for the premier’s travel, justified under the guise of security and flexibility.

News: Ontario buys used $28.9M private jet for Doug Ford: sources

April 30, 2019

Public outcry, as reflected in various comments, underscores the frustration with this decision. Many are questioning the logic behind such a costly investment when chartering or leasing options could have provided similar benefits without the hefty financial commitment. The lack of transparency in the procurement process only adds to the skepticism.

This decision is reminiscent of past controversies, such as former Premier Bill Davis’s ill-fated jet purchase in the 1980s, which was quickly reversed due to public and political pressure. Additionally, Ford has previously faced criticism for spending $50,000 on a customized van, raising concerns about his spending priorities.

To put this expenditure into perspective, the cost of the jet is comparable to the proposed new residence for Canada’s Prime Minister, as the historic 24 Sussex has been condemned. Despite the urgent need, numerous governments have delayed this decision due to spending optics—highlighting how significant such a financial commitment truly is.

News: Heritage Ottawa calls on feds to make a decision on future home of prime minister

September 16, 2025

Ontarians deserve a government that prioritizes their immediate needs. With healthcare systems struggling, educational resources stretched thin, and affordability at an all-time low, investing in a private jet is a misallocation of taxpayer dollars. This decision not only fails to address urgent issues but also erodes public trust in leadership.

As the province navigates these challenges, it is imperative for the government to demonstrate fiscal responsibility and transparency. Ontarians expect investments that enhance their quality of life, not decisions that cater to political convenience or luxury. It’s time for Premier Ford to reconsider this purchase and realign with the needs of the people he serves.

Tuesday January 6, 2026

January 6, 2026 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday January 6, 2026

Published in The Toronto Star. Published in The Winnipeg Sun.

The Ripple Effects of Trump’s Venezuelan Gamble

December 12, 2025

The recent U.S. intervention in Venezuela, led by President Trump, underscores a dangerous shift in American foreign policy. While Maduro’s leadership, marred by electoral fraud and authoritarianism, required international attention, the motives and methods of the U.S. intervention raise significant concerns.

News: 7 takeaways from Trump’s incursion into Venezuela

For Venezuelans, the removal of one dictator only to face an imperial puppet regime offers little solace. The promise of democracy is overshadowed by the reality of foreign control, driven more by oil interests than genuine reform.

Cuba, heavily reliant on Venezuelan support, faces economic uncertainty. Meanwhile, South American nations worry about a revived “Donroe Doctrine,” where U.S. influence extends aggressively across the region. Trump’s eye on Colombia and Mexico as potential targets only heightens these fears.

By focusing on Venezuela, the U.S. diverts attention from pressing global concerns, such as Russian aggression in Ukraine and China’s ambitions in Taiwan. This move risks legitimizing similar actions by other powers, destabilizing the international order.

Opinion: To Trump, on Venezuela: You Break It, You Own It

November 18, 2025

Trump’s actions contradict his promises to end foreign entanglements, likely alienating his MAGA base. Domestically, Americans witness resources diverted from pressing needs like healthcare to fund foreign interventions.
Internationally, trust in the U.S. erodes, as allies in Europe and the G7 question the reliability of American leadership under Trump.

This intervention opens a Pandora’s box of conflict and power struggles among major global players. It’s a short-sighted strategy driven by oil interests, lacking a genuine commitment to democratic change. As the U.S. navigates this precarious path, it risks destabilizing not only Venezuela but the entire geopolitical landscape.

Thursday November 13, 2025

November 13, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday November 13, 2025

Ontario’s Energy Crossroads: Balancing Costs and Sustainability

November 22, 2019

The challenge of high electricity costs in Ontario is a complex issue that can’t be resolved easily. While it’s tempting to blame past governments, like the Liberals under Dalton McGuinty, the current Ford government needs to focus on solutions rather than pointing fingers. McGuinty left office over a decade ago, so the responsibility now lies with today’s leaders.

Rising electricity costs are not just an Ontario problem; they’re happening elsewhere, including in the U.S., partly due to the shift towards green energy. This transition is essential for combating climate change, but it does bring short-term financial challenges as new technologies are adopted.

News: Average U.S. electricity bill jumps — The hidden cost slipping into 41 states

March 2, 2017

In Ontario, recent electricity rate hikes have led the Ford government to increase the Ontario Electricity Rebate, which costs taxpayers billions. While this helps in the short term, it takes away funds from essential areas like healthcare and education.

The current blanket subsidy approach is not sustainable. More targeted strategies are needed. Investing in energy efficiency can lower consumption, reducing pressure on the grid and lowering costs. Renewable energy sources like wind and solar offer cheaper alternatives to traditional ones like nuclear.

A promising development is the investment in Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), supported by the Ford government and others. SMRs are a flexible and potentially cheaper nuclear option, helping to stabilize costs. This investment shows a commitment to innovative solutions for future energy needs.

News: Critics call on Ford government to address rising hydro rates

February 24, 2017

To truly address the issue, means-tested subsidies should be implemented to focus aid on those who need it most. Modernizing energy infrastructure and reconsidering existing energy contracts for potential savings is also crucial.

In essence, Ontario needs a balanced strategy that provides immediate relief while fostering long-term solutions. The Ford government should lead with policies that reduce dependency on costly subsidies, freeing up funds for critical services and ensuring a stable energy future. This approach not only benefits Ontario but also supports global efforts to combat climate change.

Hydro Headache

August 19, 2022

For as long as I can remember, the colossal beast known as Hydro in Ontario has been riddled with issues. Over my nearly 30-year career, no government has been a stellar steward of this energy giant. Each administration has contributed its share of headaches for the next party in control. There’s certainly no shortage of complaints about the last Liberal government under Kathleen Wynne and Dalton McGuinty, especially regarding the state they left Hydro in for their successors. As an editorial cartoonist, I used a lot of ink during those years criticizing their terrible handling of Ontario Hydro. But that was eight years ago, and eventually, criticism needs to pivot to those currently in control.

The Ford government’s current approach is to subsidize the rising costs for ratepayers without seriously addressing long-term solutions. Now that the PCs have been in power for eight years, the partisan refrain on comment boards that the current problems are all Kathleen and Dalton’s fault is growing very weak indeed. Sooner or later, this lack of a comprehensive strategy will backfire because maintaining the status quo, if you can even call it a strategy, is simply unacceptable.

Thursday October 9, 20252025-18,

October 9, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday October 9, 2025

Also published in The Toronto Star.

Ford’s Speed Camera Crusade: A Roadblock to Progress

September 11, 2025

In the landscape of Ontario politics, Premier Doug Ford’s unyielding crusade against speed cameras has emerged as a perplexing focal point. This battle, characterized by labeling the cameras as mere “cash grabs,” seems oddly disproportionate when juxtaposed against the myriad of pressing issues facing the province. By digging his heels in so firmly, Ford appears to be prioritizing the grievances of speeding drivers over the broader public safety and fiscal concerns posed by municipalities.

The data speaks volumes: studies have shown that speed cameras effectively reduce speeding by up to 45% in critical areas like school zones. These cameras are not just about penalizing drivers; they’re about saving lives, reducing accidents, and ensuring safer streets for all. Yet, Ford dismisses these benefits, opting instead to propose alternatives like roundabouts and speed bumps, which are not without their own drawbacks, such as slowing emergency response times.

News: ‘The answer is no’: Doug Ford rejects mayors’ plea to rethink banning speed camera ‘cash grab’

August 8, 2025

Additionally, sin taxes, such as those imposed by speed cameras, represent a strategic method for municipalities to raise necessary funds while curbing undesirable behaviours. These financial penalties support essential services and infrastructure improvements that directly benefit the community. With Ford’s decision to eliminate speed cameras, mayors and city councils are now tasked with finding alternative sources to replace this so-called “cash grab.” This could mean introducing new taxes or cutting services, both of which could have significant implications for residents and the overall well-being of Ontario’s cities.

What makes this stance even more puzzling is the revelation that vehicles registered to his own cabinet have been frequently caught by these very cameras. This raises questions about the motivations behind such a vehement opposition. If the goal is truly to enhance road safety, why disregard the tools that have proven effective?

Imagine if this level of passion and energy were directed toward tackling Ontario’s more urgent challenges. The province faces significant issues, from healthcare and education to affordable housing and climate change. Each of these arenas demands thoughtful, evidence-based policies and collaborative efforts. Yet, the focus remains on dismantling a system that, while imperfect, serves a critical public safety function.

News: Doug Ford’s cabinet ministers are getting a lot of speeding tickets

May 16 2025

Ford’s approach suggests a disconnect between the administration and the lived realities of Ontarians. Safety experts, municipal leaders, and citizens are calling for practical solutions that address road safety without compromising financial stability. Ignoring these voices undermines the potential for constructive dialogue and progress.

In the end, leadership is about prioritizing the well-being of all citizens, not just a vocal minority. If Ford were to channel his resolve into addressing the true challenges facing Ontario, imagine the progress that could be achieved. A leader’s legacy should be measured by the positive impact on the lives of those they serve, not by an obsession with curbing tools designed to protect the public.

Ford’s Speed Bump

You know, I sometimes find myself pushing the speed limit, especially when the open roads in the countryside invite a little extra gas, or when I’m stuck behind slow drivers who seem oblivious to the world around them. It’s frustrating, right? But then there are those real speed demons—the ones who recklessly weave through traffic and endanger everyone, especially near schools and pedestrian areas. And right now, it feels like Doug Ford is siding with these reckless drivers, just like he did with land developers eager to tear up the Greenbelt. Thankfully, public outcry eventually made him see sense there. I think we’re at a similar crossroads with the speed cameras issue. If enough people speak up, maybe Ford will realize this isn’t the hill to die on. It’s time to back the speed cameras help calm traffic and let police tackle bigger issues. Come on, Dougie, it’s not worth the fight.