accountability – mackaycartoons

Friday April 18, 2025

April 18, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, Unpublished – Friday April 18, 2025

A Disservice to Canadian Voters

April 19, 2025

In the throes of an election cycle, Canadian voters find themselves navigating a landscape devoid of fully costed party platforms. As advanced polls open, the absence of detailed fiscal plans from major political players like the Liberals and Conservatives is not just a minor oversight; it’s a reckless disregard for the electorate’s right to informed decision-making.

Party platforms serve as a blueprint for governance, offering insight into priorities and fiscal strategies. They are essential for holding future governments accountable. Yet, here we are, mere weeks from casting ballots, and the fiscal blueprints remain elusive. The Conservatives have pledged to collaborate with the Parliamentary Budget Officer, while the Liberals promise a release before the advanced polls close. However, these assurances come too late in the game, leaving voters with little time to digest and debate the implications of proposed policies.

Opinion: Where are the Costed Party Platforms? The Clock is Ticking

The recklessness of this approach is underscored by the current economic climate. With Canada facing a third major economic shock in less than two decades—following the 2008 financial crisis, the 2020 pandemic, and now the 2025 US trade conflict—the need for transparent and credible fiscal planning is paramount. Proposals to cut taxes or increase spending should be weighed against the backdrop of economic uncertainty and potential deficits. The lack of detailed platforms raises questions about how these promises will be funded and whether they are fiscally responsible.

Despite this, the reality may be that the absence of costed platforms doesn’t significantly sway most voters. In an age where political campaigns often resemble theatrical performances, filled with grand promises and vague assurances, the specifics of fiscal policy may take a backseat to broader ideological alignments and emotional appeals. Many voters prioritize immediate concerns over long-term fiscal sustainability, trusting party rhetoric over detailed economic assessments.

Opinion: The hidden costs of Liberal and Conservative election promises

However, this complacency is a gamble. Without clear plans, voters are left to speculate on the sincerity and feasibility of campaign promises. It allows parties to make grandiose claims without accountability for their financial implications, potentially leading to governance that prioritizes short-term gains over sustainable economic health.

While the absence of costed platforms may not deter most voters, it represents a significant dereliction of political responsibility. It denies Canadians the opportunity to engage in meaningful debate about the future direction of the country. As citizens, we must demand more from our political leaders, insisting on transparency and accountability in their fiscal promises. The stakes are too high to accept anything less.

Wednesday February 19, 2025

February 19, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday February 19, 2025

The Training of the Seals

February 14, 2025

In our democracy, debates and open conversations are vital. They help ensure that politicians are accountable and transparent. However, in Ontario, there’s a worrying trend: Progressive Conservative (PC) candidates, including their leader Doug Ford, are avoiding public debates and media interactions. This behaviour raises concerns about the health of our democratic process.

Recently, it’s been noted that PC candidates in areas like London are skipping public forums, choosing instead to campaign door-to-door. This strategy denies voters the chance to hear from those who aim to represent them, effectively stifling the democratic process that thrives on public exchange and scrutiny.

Even Doug Ford himself has been absent from media engagements after debates, despite participating in media sessions during a trip to Washington, D.C. This absence is particularly troubling in an election where crucial issues like healthcare and climate policy are at the forefront.

News: Ontario election: PC Party candidates face heat for skipping London debates

November 9, 2021

The party’s decision to limit exposure and tightly control messaging may be an attempt to avoid missteps. However, it also suggests a lack of confidence in their candidates’ ability to speak freely and defend their positions. This control creates the impression that candidates are more like puppets, directed by unseen handlers rather than their own beliefs.

This approach is unfair to voters, who deserve representatives willing to engage openly and honestly. It undermines the core of democracy, which relies on diverse viewpoints and rigorous debate for informed decision-making.

News: Niagara Conservative Candidates on Mute

Without open engagement, voters are left with a watered-down version of political discourse, lacking the depth needed to address complex issues. This not only limits voters’ ability to make informed choices but also erodes trust in the political system.

As voters, we need to demand more from those who wish to lead. Politicians who avoid scrutiny and debate should face consequences at the polls. Our democratic process isn’t served by candidates who operate behind the scenes, guided by hidden forces.

It’s time for a change. We must insist on transparency, engagement, and accountability from our political leaders. Only then can democracy thrive, providing the insight and debate we need to tackle today’s challenges. As the election approaches, let’s remember the power of our voices and the importance of demanding a political arena where free thought and genuine engagement are the norm.

Will your vote go to the local candidate who doesn’t show up for anything?

It’s pretty disheartening to see so many local candidates skipping out on the all-candidates debates; it’s a clear indicator that the standards in our democratic process are slipping. What’s even more frustrating is that most of these candidates are from the ruling Progressive Conservative party. Ask yourselves: Do you really want someone who’s just toeing the party line representing your interests? It seems like candidates don’t even get the opportunity to demonstrate their capabilities to the local voters anymore. Add to that the lack of political flyers, no door-knocking from candidates or even volunteers, hidden election signs, and minimal media engagement, and it feels like we’re witnessing one of the most invisible election campaigns in Ontario’s history. Maybe this is part of Premier Doug Ford’s plan for the PCs, but it still doesn’t explain why the other parties are so quiet in the 2025 election. Honestly, from where I’m drawing, I haven’t seen much of anything.

Anyway, enjoy my making-of video for February 19, 2025. The Ontario election is just 9 days away…

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Saturday February 8, 2025

February 8, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday February 8, 2025

Accountability over Distraction in Ontario’s Snap Election

February 6, 2025

As Ontario faces challenges from international pressures like those from Donald Trump, Premier Doug Ford has positioned himself as a leader ready to tackle these issues. While his efforts are notable, it’s important to remember that dealing with international trade is mainly a federal responsibility. This raises questions about the timing and focus of the snap election Ford has called.

Elections are a chance to discuss all the issues facing the province. Doug Ford should be held accountable for his record and answer the concerns of Ontarians directly, rather than shifting the focus to figures like Donald Trump.

Ford’s time in office has seen promises to improve housing, infrastructure, healthcare, and affordability. However, many of these promises remain unfulfilled. The ambitious goal of building 1.5 million homes has not been met, and significant infrastructure projects like highways are delayed.

Healthcare is still a major concern, with issues like emergency room closures and doctor shortages continuing, despite promises to increase staffing.

News: With Trump’s tariffs now on hold, will Ontario’s election campaign shift gears?

August 15, 2024

Additionally, Ford’s decisions, such as changes to the Greenbelt and spending on projects like Ontario Place, have led to public dissatisfaction, with many feeling that these actions benefit the wealthy more than the average Ontarian.

Feedback from readers reflects frustration with Ford’s approach to healthcare, education, and cost of living. People feel there’s a lack of understanding and empathy from the Premier.

As voters prepare to vote, it’s crucial to evaluate Doug Ford based on what he has done, not just what he says. The election is a chance for Ford to address these issues directly and offer real solutions, rather than diverting attention to other matters.

Let’s focus on Doug Ford’s track record, hold him accountable for his promises, and demand the action that Ontarians deserve.

By week’s end, TDS had set in, with every cartoon this week fixated on Trump. I know it sounds hypocritical for me, seemingly obsessed with Trump, but I’m a cartoonist, not the Premier. I’m aware of my boundaries, but Doug Ford seems ignorant of the responsibilities he holds within his jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, Ontario’s provincial election quietly began, overshadowed by distractions. It’s as if Ford, like a cartoon hypnotist, swings a pendulum with Trump’s head, putting voters under a spell while pressing issues pile up behind him. Polls show it’s going to work.

As Ontario heads into week two of this election, it’s vital for voters to focus on Ford’s actual governance record, addressing housing, healthcare, and infrastructure challenges, among many other issue. Instead of being swayed by distractions, lets demand real solutions from Ford. I’m hopeful that next week allows for a clearer focus on pressing matters amidst the temporary reprieve from Trump’s theatrics.

Please check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 8, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I release my post every Saturday morning summarizing the week through my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading here is a “note,” designed to help craft my weekly posts and display the animated versions of my daily cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday August 29, 2024

August 29, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, published in The Hamilton Spectator and The Toronto Star, Thursday August 29, 2024

An animated version of this editorial cartoon is posted to Pinterest.

Trump’s Quibbles Mask the Real Threat to His Presidential Ambitions—The Rule of Law

February 6, 2024

As the 2024 Presidential race intensifies, Donald Trump finds himself entangled not just in a fierce electoral battle but also in a labyrinth of legal challenges that could prove far more consequential than the media spats and debate dramas he often inflames. While Trump’s complaints about the upcoming ABC debate rules and his jabs at Kamala Harris for not engaging in interviews might capture headlines, these are mere distractions compared to the looming threat posed by Special Counsel Jack Smith’s diligent legal pursuit.

New York Times: Special Counsel Revises Trump Election Indictment to Address Immunity Ruling

May 7, 2024

Trump’s grievances about the September 10 ABC debate rules are emblematic of his strategy to dominate media narratives by any means necessary. His reluctance to participate unless the rules are to his liking jeopardizes the debate itself, which might deprive the public of a crucial opportunity to hear from the candidates directly. Moreover, Trump’s criticisms of Kamala Harris’ limited media presence—though a potential talking point—have yet to gain traction. Without substantial policy critiques, Trump has struggled to move beyond his typical insults and name-calling when it comes to Harris, making it difficult for him to effectively challenge her on her record.

These quibbles, however, pale in comparison to the gravity of his legal troubles. While Trump might wish to paint himself as a victim of a “deep state” conspiracy, the reality is that the Department of Justice’s actions under Jack Smith represent a measured and necessary step in ensuring that the rule of law applies equally to all, including former presidents.

July 23, 2024

Jack Smith’s recent revisions to the indictment against Trump are a strategic maneuver aimed at aligning with the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity, while still holding Trump accountable for actions that fall outside the scope of his official duties. This move underscores the seriousness of the legal challenges Trump faces—challenges that go beyond the realm of political theatre and into the very foundations of American democracy.

The importance of Smith’s pursuit cannot be overstated. By narrowing the charges to focus on Trump’s actions as a candidate rather than as a sitting president, Smith is aiming to prevent Trump from evading accountability by hiding behind the broad protections of presidential immunity. This is not a witch hunt, as Trump and his supporters claim, but rather a crucial effort to clarify the boundaries of executive power and to ensure that no one, not even a former president, is above the law.

Analysis: Legal scholars warn SCOTUS could “manipulate” immunity definition to torpedo new Trump indictment

February 10, 2024

Trump’s narrative of victimization might resonate with his core supporters, who are quick to embrace conspiracy theories about the “deep state” and “fake media.” However, the persistence of the legal pursuit by Jack Smith offers a counterbalance—a reminder that the wheels of justice, though slow, continue to turn. This pursuit is essential not just for holding Trump accountable, but for restoring faith in the integrity of the American legal system.

As the election draws closer, the public must remain vigilant. Trump’s media maneuvers and debate complaints are designed to distract from the real issues at hand. Yet, the legal challenges he faces will likely persist, shaping the final stages of this election. In the end, it is not the noise of Trump’s complaints but the steady pursuit of justice that will have the most profound impact on the future of American democracy.

News: Robert F Kennedy Jr’s brother ‘heartbroken’ over Trump endorsement

For those who believe in the rule of law and the principles of democratic governance, Jack Smith’s efforts are a source of hope. They demonstrate that, despite the noise and distractions, the pursuit of justice remains steadfast. As the legal process unfolds, it is crucial that the American people continue to support these efforts, ensuring that the values of democracy prevail over the forces of division and deceit. (AI)

Tuesday November 8, 2022

November 8, 2022 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday November 8, 2022

Doug Ford uses a big principle for small politics

There is no real substantive reason why the Premier of Ontario can’t testify before the inquiry into the use of the Emergencies Act, but, as a Federal Court judge has ruled, he has a “lawful excuse.”

November 4, 2022

Doug Ford has found that he can indeed use an important, constitutionally entrenched principle to serve small political goals.

Mr. Ford and his Deputy Premier, Sylvia Jones, had claimed parliamentary privilege, the venerable precept that ensures the work of legislatures isn’t sidetracked by lawsuits and legal proceedings, to avoid a day of testimony this Thursday – on a day when the Ontario legislature isn’t even sitting.

He has won in court, so now he won’t have to explain why he felt Ontario’s policing laws, and Ontario’s police, weren’t enough to handle February’s truckers’ convoy protests and blockades of border crossings and city streets, or testify about those events, which took place mostly in his province.

Justice Simon Fothergill’s ruling made clear that Mr. Ford won in court because parliamentary privilege protects MPPs from having to testify before courts and inquiries – whether or not testifying would actually impede the work of the Premier, or the legislature.

February 5, 2022

In the end, Justice Fothergill acknowledged the breadth of parliamentary privilege. It isn’t some tiny technicality. It’s a principle of parliamentary independence from the courts that comes from Westminster and is entrenched in Canada’s Constitution.

But the key issue is still that Mr. Ford and Ms. Jones didn’t have to hide behind that privilege. Parliamentarians often waive it. The Premier used this big principle as a legal loophole to protect himself.

If you’re keeping score, you might notice that Mr. Ford has made a habit of invoking big constitutionally recognized mechanisms to deal with political challenges. He pre-emptively invoked the notwithstanding clause of the Charter of Rights in back-to-work legislation for support workers in Ontario schools. He backtracked on that Monday. Just because you can invoke big principles to further small politics, it doesn’t mean you should.

February 19, 2022

It is true, as Mr. Ford has argued, that the Emergencies Act inquiry revolves around a federal government decision. What’s at issue is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s decision to invoke the act on Feb. 14 to respond to the convoy protests. That legislation,

which allowed the authorities to employ extraordinary powers including freezing bank accounts, is only to be used when no other law will do. The inquiry must determine whether that threshold was met.

But to get there, the commission has to figure out whether normal policing – under the jurisdiction of the province – should have been enough. Mr. Ford felt it wasn’t. (The Globe & Mail)