2025-20 – mackaycartoons

Thursday November 13, 2025

November 13, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday November 13, 2025

Ontario’s Energy Crossroads: Balancing Costs and Sustainability

November 22, 2019

The challenge of high electricity costs in Ontario is a complex issue that can’t be resolved easily. While it’s tempting to blame past governments, like the Liberals under Dalton McGuinty, the current Ford government needs to focus on solutions rather than pointing fingers. McGuinty left office over a decade ago, so the responsibility now lies with today’s leaders.

Rising electricity costs are not just an Ontario problem; they’re happening elsewhere, including in the U.S., partly due to the shift towards green energy. This transition is essential for combating climate change, but it does bring short-term financial challenges as new technologies are adopted.

News: Average U.S. electricity bill jumps — The hidden cost slipping into 41 states

March 2, 2017

In Ontario, recent electricity rate hikes have led the Ford government to increase the Ontario Electricity Rebate, which costs taxpayers billions. While this helps in the short term, it takes away funds from essential areas like healthcare and education.

The current blanket subsidy approach is not sustainable. More targeted strategies are needed. Investing in energy efficiency can lower consumption, reducing pressure on the grid and lowering costs. Renewable energy sources like wind and solar offer cheaper alternatives to traditional ones like nuclear.

A promising development is the investment in Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), supported by the Ford government and others. SMRs are a flexible and potentially cheaper nuclear option, helping to stabilize costs. This investment shows a commitment to innovative solutions for future energy needs.

News: Critics call on Ford government to address rising hydro rates

February 24, 2017

To truly address the issue, means-tested subsidies should be implemented to focus aid on those who need it most. Modernizing energy infrastructure and reconsidering existing energy contracts for potential savings is also crucial.

In essence, Ontario needs a balanced strategy that provides immediate relief while fostering long-term solutions. The Ford government should lead with policies that reduce dependency on costly subsidies, freeing up funds for critical services and ensuring a stable energy future. This approach not only benefits Ontario but also supports global efforts to combat climate change.

Hydro Headache

August 19, 2022

For as long as I can remember, the colossal beast known as Hydro in Ontario has been riddled with issues. Over my nearly 30-year career, no government has been a stellar steward of this energy giant. Each administration has contributed its share of headaches for the next party in control. There’s certainly no shortage of complaints about the last Liberal government under Kathleen Wynne and Dalton McGuinty, especially regarding the state they left Hydro in for their successors. As an editorial cartoonist, I used a lot of ink during those years criticizing their terrible handling of Ontario Hydro. But that was eight years ago, and eventually, criticism needs to pivot to those currently in control.

The Ford government’s current approach is to subsidize the rising costs for ratepayers without seriously addressing long-term solutions. Now that the PCs have been in power for eight years, the partisan refrain on comment boards that the current problems are all Kathleen and Dalton’s fault is growing very weak indeed. Sooner or later, this lack of a comprehensive strategy will backfire because maintaining the status quo, if you can even call it a strategy, is simply unacceptable.

Wednesday November 12, 2025

November 12, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday November 12, 2025

Losing Measles Elimination Status is a Humiliating Wake-Up Call for Canada

March 6, 2024

Canada’s recent loss of its measles elimination status is not just a public health setback; it’s a national embarrassment that underscores the urgent need to address the pervasive influence of misinformation and the political coddling of anti-vaccine sentiments. For nearly three decades, Canada stood as a model for controlling vaccine-preventable diseases. Today, however, we face a stark reality: the resurgence of measles, a disease we had once conquered, due to declining vaccination rates and the unchecked spread of misinformation.

This humiliating development should serve as a wake-up call for public health authorities and politicians alike. The outbreak, which has now persisted for over a year and spread across multiple provinces, is a direct consequence of allowing personal beliefs, fuelled by misinformation, to override scientific consensus and public health imperatives. The fact that Canada is the only country in the Americas to lose its measles-free status highlights the severity of our failure.

NYT: Canada Is About to Lose Its Status as Having Eliminated Measles

August 28, 2021

A major part of this problem is the dangerous libertarian streak espoused by political leaders like Alberta’s Premier Danielle Smith. By prioritizing personal choice and framing the unvaccinated as a “discriminated-against group,” Smith has enabled anti-vaxxers, undermining public health efforts. This approach not only jeopardizes individual health but also threatens community safety, as it places individual freedoms above collective well-being, leading to preventable illnesses and deaths.

Public health authorities must confront this issue head-on, starting with a robust response to misinformation. This includes launching nationwide educational campaigns that clearly communicate the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Authorities must engage with communities directly, particularly those with historically low vaccination rates, to rebuild trust and dispel myths perpetuated by anti-vaccine movements.

News: Canada has lost its measles elimination status. Public health officials say it should be a wake-up call

September 6, 2025

Moreover, there needs to be a concerted effort to implement consistent vaccination policies across all provinces, removing non-medical exemptions that allow personal beliefs to endanger public health. While personal choice is a valued principle, it cannot come at the cost of public safety. The resurgence of measles is a stark reminder that when vaccination rates fall, preventable diseases return, with devastating consequences.

Canada’s loss of measles elimination status is a call to action. We must recommit to public health principles, prioritize science over politics, and ensure that the hard-won victories of the past are not undone by complacency and misinformation. The health of our nation depends on it.

Wanted: a Vaccine Against Antivaxx Misinformation

July 8, 2025

Growing up surrounded by healthcare professionals, I’ve seen firsthand the positive impact of preventative medicine. My family—comprised of nurses, physicians, and a dentist—has dedicated decades to treating patients and advocating for preventative measures like vaccines and fluoride. These aren’t schemes by big pharma; they’re proven methods that have saved millions of lives.
It’s frustrating to see leaders pandering to conspiracy theorists and so-called specialists who undermine decades of medical advancement. My grandfather, a dedicated family physician, would be rolling in his grave if he knew how far we’ve strayed from trusting science and expertise.

What baffles me is the willingness of otherwise rational people to buy into misinformation. It’s like a virus itself, infecting minds that should know better. Sadly, there’s no vaccine for this kind of ignorance. It’s up to us to speak out, educate, and uphold the integrity of science-based medicine. We owe it to the generations before us and to the health of future generations.

Tuesday November 11, 2025

November 11, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday November 11, 2025

From Allies to Uncertainty: A Remembrance Day Reflection

October 14, 2021

Reflecting on this Remembrance Day, we find ourselves at a poignant crossroads, 80 years after Canadians and Americans stood shoulder to shoulder in the fight for freedom and democracy during World War II. This partnership, forged in the crucible of global conflict, was reaffirmed through subsequent decades, most recently in the harsh landscapes of Afghanistan, where Canadian and American troops once again fought side by side against tyranny.

Yet today, as we honour those who sacrificed so much for the cause of liberty, there is an awkwardness in the air, a shift in the sentiments that have long underpinned our alliance. Recent political developments have seen a departure from the steadfast “they fought for freedom” mantra that has united us. The rhetoric from the American President has introduced uncertainty, suggesting a lapse in the collective memory of shared sacrifices and a move away from the values that once bound us so tightly.

News: Trump’s threats leave Canadian Afghan war veterans feeling angry and betrayed

June 6, 2023

This shift is starkly evident in the current U.S. administration’s stance toward authoritarian figures, notably Vladimir Putin, amidst the ongoing invasion of Ukraine. Such positions challenge the longstanding narrative of fighting for freedom and raise significant concerns about the future of collective security and moral leadership.

Under Prime Minister Mark Carney, Canada has responded by fortifying its defence commitments, striving to meet NATO’s targets and asserting its role on the global stage. These actions reflect not just a strategic necessity but a reaffirmation of Canada’s dedication to the principles of peace and security.

Despite the political discord, the enduring friendship between our peoples remains a source of hope. Polls show that Americans, regardless of political affiliation, continue to view Canada as a trusted ally and partner. This sentiment underscores a deep-rooted connection that transcends political fluctuations.

News: Sorry, Trump. Americans Still See Canada as a Friend

April 10, 2007

As we commemorate this Remembrance Day, we must reflect on these evolving dynamics. The peace dividend of WWII, which brought unprecedented prosperity and cooperation, appears to be giving way to a new era marked by geopolitical uncertainties. It is a reminder of the importance of vigilance and the necessity of preserving the hard-won freedoms that define us.

Let us honour the memory of those who sacrificed for freedom by committing to dialogue and cooperation, striving to navigate this new course while holding fast to the values of democracy and peace. Their legacy calls on us to ensure that these values continue to guide our actions, even in an era of change.

Lest We Forget: Bridges Built on Sacrifice

Every year, as Remembrance Day approaches, I wrestle with the decision of how best to honour the day through my work. It’s a constant tug-of-war between the traditional imagery of poppies and silhouetted soldiers, and my desire to present something fresh and meaningful. While many readers find comfort and nostalgia in the familiar tear-jerkers, my instinct is to push for relevance and reflection on current events.

This year, I feel compelled to address the state of our alliance with our neighbours to the south. Despite the polarizing influence of one powerful leader, the essence of Remembrance Day should remind us of the sacrifices made in the name of unity and cooperation, not division. It’s a day meant to reflect on how countless individuals once stood together against tyranny, and to challenge us to preserve those bonds in the face of contemporary threats.

The message I hope to convey is one of resilience and solidarity. Even as political climates shift, the enduring spirit of our alliance must prevail. Remembrance Day is a time to honour past sacrifices by committing to mutual respect and friendship in the present. Let’s not allow current tensions to overshadow the shared history we’ve built and the peace we’ve maintained.

Saturday, November 8 2025

November 8, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday, November 8 2025

Carney’s Progressive Conservative Play: Filling Canada’s Political Void

November 6, 2025

In recent months, Mark Carney’s leadership has sparked a significant shift in Canada’s political landscape, one that resonates with a growing segment of the electorate seeking balanced governance. His approach, seen in both his policy decisions and the latest budget, reflects a strategic alignment that attracts a broader voter base—those who favor economic conservatism while remaining cautious of traditional Conservative leadership under Pierre Poilievre.

Carney’s strategy is not just a political maneuver; it is a reflection of a pragmatic response to the evolving needs of Canadians. By integrating fiscal responsibility with moderate social policies, Carney is effectively bridging the gap between progressive ideals and conservative economic principles. This has created a new centrist path that appeals to voters who are disillusioned with the polarized political environment.

Opinion: Mark Carney, and the return of the progressive conservative

June 25, 2025

The recent budget underscores this shift, emphasizing investment in economic growth, prudent fiscal management, and a significant boost to defence spending without raising taxes. Such measures are reminiscent of the Progressive Conservative ethos, which values economic stewardship and strategic public investment. Carney’s policies have attracted not only centrist voters but also some members of Poilievre’s Conservative caucus, who have started to defect in search of a more balanced political home.

Canada finds itself in a unique situation, navigating the twin challenges of economic forces imposed by a hostile Donald Trump and the broader unfavourable global trade conditions. With tariffs and protectionist stances affecting traditional trade dynamics, Carney is undertaking plans to diversify Canada’s trade relationships, reducing reliance on the U.S. and reaching out to global markets. This strategic pivot seeks to secure economic resilience amid geopolitical tensions.

Analysis: Mark Carney has turned the Titanic. He needs to keep turning

April 30, 2024

Amid these challenges, Canada also faces a cost of living crisis, putting pressure on households nationwide. Carney understands he cannot simply turn to taxpayers to fill budgetary gaps, nor can he afford to slash the public sector too deeply without risking further economic strain. The public sector plays a crucial role in maintaining economic stability, and drastic cuts could exacerbate the crisis by reducing consumer spending and increasing unemployment.

At the same time, Carney recognizes the need to bolster Canada’s military capabilities in an increasingly dangerous world. With aggressive posturing from leaders like Russia’s Vladimir Putin and ongoing uncertainties with Trump, the commitment to enhance defence spending is crucial. While this has come at the expense of some climate change initiatives, it reflects a necessary prioritization of national security in the current global climate.

April 22, 2025

Carney’s ability to attract a diverse voter base is further evidenced by his commitment to cutting bureaucratic inefficiencies, streamlining regulatory processes, and focusing on infrastructure and housing projects. These initiatives resonate with Canadians who believe in the power of government to facilitate growth while appreciating the importance of a lean, effective public sector.

The political defections and shifting allegiances highlight a broader sentiment: Canadians are ready for a change from the divisive rhetoric and are looking for leadership that offers a clear, positive vision for the future. This is where Carney excels, providing a roadmap that combines the best of economic conservatism with a progressive social conscience.

January 16, 2025

Mark Carney’s strategy is not just a recalibration of the Liberal Party; it represents a necessary evolution in Canadian politics. By navigating the complex web of global challenges and attracting those wary of Poilievre’s conservative approach, Carney is not only redefining his party but also setting a new standard for governance—one that prioritizes unity, growth, and security. This is a vision that resonates with many Canadians, positioning Carney as a transformative leader capable of guiding Canada toward a prosperous and secure future, all while managing the delicate balance of economic pressures at home.

Carney the Progressive Conservative

How boring are we Canadians? We’re so boring that a federal budget release this week is on par with last week’s up and down drama of the Blue Jays in the World Series! And yes, I’m that boring too. Instead of indulging in thrilling news, I’ve spent the week crafting editorial cartoons on just one subject: the federal budget. The grand finale of these cartoons? My take on the week’s winner: Mark Carney.

The week kicked off with the budget’s unveiling, sparking analysis, praise, and criticism from all sides. It became a hotbed of drama, featuring two attempts by the opposition to topple the government, resulting in a defection and a political retirement from the Conservative caucus. Amidst all this, Carney’s strategy emerged as the victor, charting a clear fiscal course for Canada.

Mark Carney is a Liberal in name only; he’s arguably the most Progressive Conservative Prime Minister since the days of Mulroney and Campbell in the early ’90s. It seems to be the winning strategy, at least for now. I’ve become that old pundit I used to hear in my 20s comparing Mulroney to Diefenbaker. Wow, I’m really getting old!

Friday November 7, 2025

November 7, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday November 7, 2025

Carney Balances Economy and Defence Against the Environment

September 9, 2025

In recent years, Canada has found itself at a critical juncture, caught between the pressing need for economic stability and the moral imperative to tackle climate change. The latest federal budget under Prime Minister Mark Carney reflects this tension, as it prioritizes economic competitiveness, particularly in the oil and gas sector, over aggressive climate action. This shift has sparked debate over whether Canada is retreating from its climate commitments, especially in light of Carney’s decision to forgo attending the COP30 climate summit.

Opinion: Federal budget signals Carney’s new tone on climate policy, but not much substance

July 30, 2024

Historically, Canada’s approach to climate policy has been marked by ambitious goals often undermined by substantial financial support for fossil fuels. This duality was evident during Justin Trudeau’s tenure, where climate advocacy coexisted with billions in subsidies to the oil and gas industry. Now, under Carney, who once served as a climate finance envoy, there appears to be a pragmatic recalibration of priorities.

The reality is that economic pressures are undeniable. Global energy markets, job preservation, and national security concerns compel governments to ensure economic resilience. Carney’s budget reflects a strategy to bolster economic growth while investing in green technologies through market-based solutions like carbon pricing and carbon capture. This approach, however, has been criticized as insufficiently bold, especially given Canada’s high per capita emissions.

Analysis: These are the environmental programs to be cut under Carney’s first budget

April 23, 2025

Moreover, Canada’s climate policy cannot be viewed in isolation. The country’s economic and environmental strategies are closely tied to those of its southern neighbour. With the U.S. under the Trump administration having previously abandoned federal green policies, Canada faces the challenge of aligning its ambitions with shifting geopolitical landscapes. This alignment is also mirrored in defence spending, where Canada has faced criticism for not meeting NATO’s 2% GDP spending target, a point of contention that placed the country on a list of defence laggards. Now, after years of scrutiny and pressure, Canada is ramping up its military expenditure, reflecting a broader shift to meet international obligations and restore its standing among allies.

April 21, 2023

While critics aren’t necessarily arguing that Canada is outright retreating to its status as a climate laggard, concerns are growing that the nation is on its way to reclaiming this dubious distinction. The Carney government’s abandonment of bold climate measures aligns more closely with the Poilievre Conservatives, who appear to lack substantial climate policies and are often seen as climate change skeptics. This shift raises questions about Canada’s long-term commitment to meaningful climate action.

News: Mark Carney set to miss COP30 climate summit: sources

Ultimately, Canada stands at a crossroads. The path forward requires not just pragmatic governance but visionary leadership that reconciles economic realities with the urgent need for climate action. As Canadians, we must hold our leaders accountable while supporting innovative solutions that drive both economic vitality and environmental stewardship. The journey towards a sustainable future is fraught with challenges, but it is one we must embark upon with unwavering commitment.

Laggard Metamorphosis: Carney’s Climate Conundrum

Like him or not, and I think Mark Carney is one of the more capable and effective Prime Ministers we’ve had in Canada in a long time. However, if there’s one area where his leadership falls short, it’s his struggle to uphold his credibility as a climate change activist. Sadly, he seems to lack the knack for combating the misinformation and ignorance propagated by climate change deniers like Donald Trump and Pierre Poilievre, along with their many backward-thinking supporters. I didn’t hold much respect for Justin Trudeau, but despite the hypocrisy of his government dishing out billions in subsidies to the oil and gas industry while performing climate virtue signalling, he at least had the guts to put a price on carbon, and he deserves some credit for that. Carney now seems to be edging closer to Poilievre’s stance of doing less on climate action. It’s a reality that neither Liberals nor Conservatives are keen to admit, but it’s staring us in the face.