Iran – mackaycartoons

Friday February 21, 2025

February 21, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday February 21, 2025 (also, The Toronto Star)

Trump’s Dangerous Dance with Authoritarianism: Rewriting Reality

October 26, 2024

In a world increasingly fraught with geopolitical tensions and the stark realities of authoritarian aggression, the responsibility of democratic nations to uphold truth and justice has never been more critical. As former President Donald Trump seeks to rewrite history by casting Ukraine as a villain and its leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, as a dictator, it is imperative that the global community stands united against this dangerous narrative.

The facts are clear and undisputed: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was an unprovoked act of aggression, a blatant breach of international law, and a humanitarian disaster that has claimed countless innocent lives. Ukraine, under the steadfast leadership of Zelenskyy, has fought valiantly to defend its sovereignty and democratic principles against an authoritarian regime bent on its destruction.

December 10, 2024

Trump’s recent comments not only distort these truths but also align disturbingly with the playbook of authoritarian leaders like Vladimir Putin, a man widely recognized as a war criminal due to his regime’s actions in Ukraine. By shifting blame onto the victim of this brutal conflict, Trump undermines the very principles of justice and democracy that the United States and its allies have long championed.

As highlighted in a New York Times piece by Peter Baker, Trump’s revisionism involves “a striking distortion of reality,” where he falsely accuses Ukraine of initiating the conflict and portrays Zelenskyy as a “dictator without elections.” Such rhetoric not only misleads but also endangers the fragile alliances and support systems that have been built to uphold international law and order.

News: Trump Flips the Script on the Ukraine War, Blaming Zelensky Not Putin

September 28, 2024

This revisionist rhetoric poses a grave threat to the established world order, one that has, despite its imperfections, largely sought to promote peace, stability, and human rights. By sowing doubt and division, Trump risks weakening the unity of Western nations and emboldening authoritarian regimes that see opportunity in discord.

It is incumbent upon the leaders of democratic nations, including those in Europe, Canada, the UK, and beyond, to resist this dangerous narrative. Silence in the face of such blatant misinformation and revisionism is not an option. To remain silent is to tacitly endorse a worldview that values power over principle, lies over truth, and tyranny over freedom.

February 13, 2024

As one courageous GOP congressman pointed out, Vladimir Putin’s actions warrant the label of war criminal, a fact that cannot be ignored or softened by political expediency. It is a moral and ethical imperative for politicians, regardless of party affiliation, to speak out against any attempt to rehabilitate or justify his regime’s actions.

History will judge those who, in a time of moral crisis, chose the path of least resistance. It will remember those who stood by and allowed truth to be eclipsed by falsehoods for political gain. But it will also honour those who had the courage to speak out, to defend the values of democracy and human rights, and to stand with the oppressed against their oppressors.

In this pivotal moment, the global community must reaffirm its commitment to these principles. We must reject revisionism, support the victims of aggression, and hold accountable those who seek to distort reality for their own ends. Only by doing so can we hope to preserve the fragile peace and order that so many have fought and died to protect.

Today, I poured my creativity into crafting a cartoon that tackles a situation fraught with serious implications. The focus was on former President Donald Trump’s recent statements about Ukraine’s leader, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, amidst the ongoing conflict with Russia. Despite the cartoon’s lighthearted approach, the underlying issues are deeply concerning.

It’s telling that a lot of people say everything Trump says is a lie, reflecting a widespread skepticism and mistrust. This perception adds a layer of complexity, especially as Trump leads efforts to broker peace in a critical conflict with questionable intentions. Many still believe him, which only deepens the divide between those who seek truth and those who follow his narrative.

While the cartoon aims to entertain, it also highlights the troubling reality of misleading rhetoric. It underscores my worry about the direction of global politics and the urgent need for leaders who prioritize truth and genuine peace efforts.

Please check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 21, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I release my post every Saturday morning summarizing the week through my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading here is a “note,” designed to help craft my weekly posts and display the animated versions of my daily cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Tuesday December 10, 2024

December 10, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

December 10, 2024

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday December 10, 2024

The Fall of Assad—A Milestone with Challenges Ahead

June 14, 2000

The end of Bashar al-Assad’s rule in Syria marks the fall of one of the most brutal and kleptocratic regimes in modern history. For decades, Assad maintained power through violence, corruption, and fear, overseeing a system that prioritized personal enrichment and oligarchic control while Syria’s people endured economic stagnation and political repression. His crimes against humanity include some of the darkest chapters of the 21st century. Chief among them was the use of sarin gas in Ghouta in 2013, which killed over 1,400 civilians, including hundreds of children, and similar chemical attacks in Douma and other towns. These atrocities, along with systematic torture, extrajudicial killings, and targeting of civilian infrastructure, demand that Assad be brought to justice at The Hague.

October 20, 2023

The fall of Assad’s regime should be a moment of hope for the Syrian people and the world. It eliminates a linchpin of regional instability and weakens the axis of Iran and Russia, both of whom propped up Assad to extend their influence and wage proxy wars. Tehran and Moscow now face significant setbacks, as Syria’s descent into chaos was a crucial element of their geopolitical strategies. The loss of a loyal ally also strains their broader plans to undermine Western influence and protect their regional interests.

News: From Trump and Turkey, to Russia and Iran — Syria’s regime change has huge global consequences

August 24, 2011

Yet optimism is tempered by the lessons of recent history. The fall of other autocrats—such as Muammar Gaddafi in Libya and Ali Abdullah Saleh in Yemen—has shown that the end of tyranny often leads not to peace, but to fragmentation. Already, Syria’s future is in question. The forces that toppled Assad remain fragmented, with unclear intentions. Will they work toward a pluralistic democracy, or will the vacuum be filled by militant Islamists or fractious warlords? The spectre of Syria becoming another Libya or Yemen looms large, and with it comes the threat of worsening humanitarian crises and regional instability.

News: Trump has big plans at home, but Syria shows why he can’t escape the world’s problems

October 10, 2019

Adding to the complexity is the stance of President-elect Donald Trump, who has signalled a reluctance to engage. Trump’s dismissal of the crisis as “not our fight” and his stated preference for American disengagement risk leaving Syria’s future to be shaped entirely by other powers. While his instinct to avoid another costly military intervention is understandable, a complete abdication of U.S. influence would be shortsighted. Syria’s fate affects global security, refugee flows, and the balance of power in the Middle East.

July 25, 2012

However, engagement does not need to mean boots on the ground. The U.S. and its allies have diplomatic, economic, and humanitarian tools that can help steer Syria toward stability. Coordinating international aid, mediating among rival factions, and ensuring accountability for war crimes—including Assad’s use of chemical weapons—are ways the U.S. can support Syria’s transition without direct military involvement. Ignoring this moment, as some readers and commentators have noted, risks exacerbating the chaos and allowing the most ruthless actors to dictate Syria’s future.

February 23, 2018

The fall of Assad is a victory against tyranny, but it is only a step on the path to rebuilding a shattered nation. Syria’s people have suffered enough under his rule and deserve the chance to chart their own course. It is incumbent upon the international community to ensure this pivotal moment leads to peace, justice, and the beginnings of a stable, inclusive government. Whether Assad himself faces justice for his crimes will be a key test of that effort and a signal to other despots that impunity is no longer an option.

This past weekend, the world woke up to something many thought they’d never see: the sudden collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s brutal dictatorship. After over five decades of the Assad family’s grip on Syria, the regime crumbled as its two lifelines, Russia and Iran, finally pulled out, distracted by their own mounting crises. It’s a moment that feels both overdue and precarious, a mix of cautious hope and the dread of what’s next.

I’ve been drawing Bashar Assad for more than 25 years, watching his transformation from an awkward heir apparent to one of the Middle East’s most notorious autocrats. Back in 2000, when the younger Assad inherited power from his father Hafez, there was a brief flicker of optimism that maybe, just maybe, he’d steer Syria toward reform. He was, after all, “from my generation,” two years older than me—a fact that still unsettles me as I think about how differently our lives turned out. It took about five minutes for that hope to evaporate. My first drawing of Bashar captured that cynicism. Twenty years later, it’s not smugness I feel about being right—it’s exhaustion at the cost of his reign: a half-million lives lost, cities turned to rubble, the mass displacement of Syrians, and atrocities like barrel bombs and sarin gas attacks on his own people.

Now that he’s toppled, the map of Syria looks like a surreal Christmas cookie—splintered into countless zones of control, each a proxy for international players or local factions. Russia and Iran, Assad’s chief backers, are the obvious losers here. Their investment in this dictatorship hasn’t just failed; it’s left them weaker on the global stage. For Iran, it’s a blow to its regional influence. For Putin, it’s another humiliation in a year full of them. The rubble of Assad’s Syria is now their shared legacy.

And then there’s the United States, where President Trump seems blindsided by all of this. His long-standing preference for “staying out of the Middle East mess” is being tested in real time. It’s hard to imagine him being thrilled about having to recalibrate American policy—or frankly, even getting briefed on it. You can practically hear him grumbling, “This isn’t my problem,” as he reluctantly puts his golf clubs away.

In many ways, Assad’s collapse feels like the fall of Mubarak or Gaddafi—a dictator toppled, a power vacuum created, and a nervous world watching to see which warlord, faction, or proxy will claim the spoils. Yet there’s a unique tragedy to Syria, a country that has been so relentlessly broken by both its rulers and foreign meddling that it’s hard to imagine what “stability” even looks like anymore.

One thing is certain: whatever comes next, it cannot be worse than Assad’s reign. But then again, we’ve said that before, haven’t we?

This animated making-of clip of the Dec 10, 2024 editorial cartoon introduces an attempt at trying out an AI generated Trump voice. Yes, I know, it needs work… volume up please. Enjoy! Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday November 21, 2024

November 21, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday November 21, 2024

Iran’s Meddling, Trump’s Rise and The Irwin Cotler Case

April 6, 2024

Irwin Cotler, a former Justice Minister and a globally respected champion for human rights, has spent decades challenging authoritarian regimes, particularly Iran. His relentless advocacy has made him a target of harassment, exemplifying Tehran’s disturbing ability to extend its oppressive reach beyond its borders. Cotler’s experience highlights a glaring vulnerability in Canada’s approach to foreign interference—a vulnerability that must be addressed as Iran escalates its meddling internationally.

News: MPs unanimously condemn alleged Iranian plot to kill Irwin Cotler

Donald Trump’s return to power and his administration’s renewed focus on Iran present a moment of paradox for Canada. While Trump’s policies often draw progressive ire, his aggressive stance on Tehran could inadvertently create a reprieve from Iran’s interference, including its targeting of Canadian critics like Cotler. Yet, this should not lead to complacency. Trump’s erraticism cannot substitute for a coherent Canadian strategy to protect its sovereignty. Cotler’s case illustrates that Tehran’s interference threatens individuals and the fabric of Canada’s democracy. Canada cannot continue to rely on reactionary policies; it must develop proactive measures to shield human rights defenders, counter disinformation, and expose foreign influence operations.

Opinion: Get ready for “Maximum Pressure 2.0” on Iran

December 18, 2020

The stakes are high. Tehran has demonstrated its ability to manipulate democratic spaces while silencing dissent and undermining international norms. For Canada, this is a moment to step up—not merely to protect individuals like Cotler but to safeguard the principles he has fought for throughout his career. Trump’s policies may pressure Iran, but Canada must seize the opportunity to define its own path in standing against Tehran’s destabilizing activities. In doing so, it can honour Cotler’s legacy and reaffirm its commitment to defending democracy and human rights at home and abroad.

Canadians love to tell the world how polite we are. Peacekeepers, they say. Travellers with a maple leaf proudly stitched on our backpacks, the “nice ones” of the English-speaking world. Maybe that was true once, back when our actions matched the stereotype—when we stood tall in WWII, fighting for freedom on the world stage. But today? The world’s shifting, and that image feels more like nostalgia.

We’re under attack from foreign meddlers. Think of the Two Michaels—Spavor and Kovrig—held hostage in China for years as pawns in a geopolitical chess match. Or Michael Chong, the MP who discovered his family was targeted by Beijing in retaliation for his criticism of China’s human rights abuses. Let’s not forget the meddling in Canada’s Parliament, where China sought to influence elections, or Russia’s efforts to spread disinformation online to divide us and undermine democracy. And now, the case of Irwin Cotler—one of Canada’s most celebrated human rights advocates—threatened for standing up to the Iranian regime.

Sure, Trump’s got a missile in his hand and is ready to give Tehran a good scare. But can we really count on the U.S. to save us? The Irwin Cotler case is a loud reminder: Canada can’t afford to just lean on politeness and the hope of external protection. The threats to Canadian sovereignty are real, and they’re growing. It’s time we step up, protect our own, and defend the values we claim to champion. Cotler’s fight is our fight, and it’s about time we acted like it.

Please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, if you haven’t already. Posts come out every Friday as I summarize the week that was in my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading now is regarded as a “note”, which is used to help compose my weekly posts and showcase the animated versions of my daily editorial cartoons. Subscriptions will always be free – as long as my position remains as a staff editorial cartoonist. Thanks.

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday October 2, 2024

October 8, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Tuesday October 8, 2024

Animated making-of clip here!

A Year After October 7: The Dead End of Hamas’s Brutality and the World’s Inaction

September 28, 2024

As we mark the first anniversary of Hamas’s brutal assault on Israel, it is impossible to overstate the devastating consequences of that attack—not just for the Israelis and Palestinians but for the broader goal of peace in the Middle East. In his recent essay, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman forcefully condemned Hamas’s actions on October 7, calling them not only indefensible but also a severe setback to any hopes for a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He is right. Hamas’s violence, fuelled by hatred and driven by no goal other than destruction, has shattered any glimmers of hope for the long-term solution that should be the only acceptable outcome: two states for two peoples, living side by side in dignity and peace.

Thomas L. Friedman: What I’m Thinking About on the First Anniversary of the War

The attack, in which Hamas brutally murdered, kidnapped, and terrorized Israeli civilians, was horrific. It left communities devastated, families shattered, and deepened the abyss of mutual mistrust and hostility. But beyond the raw brutality, what is particularly tragic is how much this act has set back the cause of Palestinian statehood—the very cause Hamas claims to represent. By engaging in terrorism rather than constructive diplomacy, Hamas not only reignited Israel’s fury but also reinforced global skepticism about the possibility of a peaceful Palestinian leadership emerging in Gaza.

March 20, 2024

For decades, the two-state solution has been seen by many, including Friedman and countless international diplomats, as the only viable path to peace. Yet Hamas’s actions have pushed that vision further out of reach. It was a strategic blunder as much as it was a moral atrocity, handing Israel the justification to retaliate with overwhelming force and to focus on military victory rather than any long-term political solution.

And what of the innocent civilians on both sides? The war has inflicted untold suffering on ordinary people, caught in the crossfire of this seemingly endless conflict. In Israel, families live in constant fear of rocket attacks. In Gaza, civilians—women, children, the elderly—are paying the price for Hamas’s decision to embed itself in residential areas, hospitals, and schools. Gaza’s residents, already living in crippling poverty and under blockade, have been subjected to unimaginable horrors. Hospitals have been bombed, neighbourhoods reduced to rubble, and the humanitarian crisis has worsened by the day. Israel’s military actions, aimed at Hamas, have also caused widespread civilian casualties, deepening the despair of a people who have already suffered for far too long.

Yet as Friedman rightly points out, Israel, too, bears responsibility for its inability to offer a vision for Gaza beyond “total victory” over Hamas. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s government has pursued a war strategy that, without a plan for what comes next, risks turning Gaza into an eternal battlefield. The relentless bombing of schools and homes to kill a few militants is not a long-term solution, and it only solidifies Israel’s image as a brutal occupier in the eyes of much of the world. Without articulating a vision for peace—a real future for the Palestinians who live in Gaza—Israel will never be able to claim victory in the broader battle for the moral high ground.

October 20, 2023

The international community, for its part, has failed miserably in its responsibility to broker peace and end the senselessness. For a year, global leaders have stood by, wringing their hands while the violence escalates, incapable or unwilling to step in and demand a cease-fire, negotiate a viable solution, or impose any meaningful consequences for war crimes. The United States, under President Biden, has sent mixed messages—offering tepid warnings to Israel while continuing to supply weapons. Meanwhile, Europe, once a voice for human rights, has largely remained silent as Gaza burns. The global community’s dysfunction and impotence are a tragedy of their own, enabling the continuation of violence and suffering.

News: War rages on multiple fronts as Israel marks a year since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attack

Friedman also touches on a darker undercurrent in Israeli politics: Prime Minister Netanyahu’s apparent interest in prolonging the war to serve his own political needs. Facing corruption charges, Netanyahu has used the conflict to delay his day in court and to bolster his standing with his far-right allies, who demand total victory and the continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank. This political calculus, combined with a lack of coherent strategy, risks dragging Israel into a perpetual cycle of violence, one in which neither peace nor security can ever be fully achieved.

October 14, 2023

This anniversary is a grim reminder of what happens when extremism, short-term thinking, and cynical political maneuvering drive policy instead of a genuine commitment to peace. Hamas, with its embrace of terror and rejection of diplomacy, has done as much harm to the Palestinian cause as it has to Israeli civilians. Meanwhile, Israel’s military response, unchecked by the international community and lacking any clear endgame, has deepened the suffering of Palestinians and alienated the global moral support it once relied on.

But there is a way forward—if only the world will seize it. As Friedman suggests, the key lies in rebuilding a legitimate Palestinian partner for peace, one that is capable of leading Gaza and the West Bank toward statehood. The Palestinian Authority, despite its flaws, remains the only viable alternative to Hamas. Israel must support its reform and empower it to govern Gaza, as part of a broader vision of two states. At the same time, the international community must pressure Israel to halt settlement expansion and recognize that permanent occupation and endless war will never bring security or peace.

It is a bitter irony that, one year after the October 7 attacks, the future seems bleaker than ever for both Israelis and Palestinians. But it does not have to be this way. There is still a path toward peace, if leaders on all sides are willing to take it. That path, however, requires an end to violence, an end to cynicism, and a renewed commitment to the only solution that can ever bring lasting justice and security: two states for two peoples, living side by side. Anything less is not just a failure of leadership—it is a failure of humanity. (AI)

Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Wednesday October 9, 2024

Cartoon an ‘inversion of reality’

October 9, 2024 letter

Graeme Mackay’s Oct. 8 cartoon depicted Israel’s prime minister fighting over a dove with Iran’s ayatollah, standing over a mountain of bones. This caricature drew an obscene moral equivalence.

One year ago, Hamas (an Iranian-backed terrorist proxy), launched the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. The next day, Hezbollah, another Iranian proxy, began firing 10,000 rockets indiscriminately into Israel. Soon the Houthis in Yemen and other groups allied with Iran joined in. All of them are sworn to Israel’s destruction.

And yet Israel — for refusing to lie down and die — is put in the same category as the genocidal maniacs who seek to destroy it, and whose followers have been rampaging on our streets for a year? This is akin to showing Hitler and Churchill fighting over a mountain of graves and is an absolute inversion of reality.

Robert Walker, assistant director, Honest Reporting Canada

Letter to the Editor, The Hamilton Spectator, Thursday October 10, 2024

Innocents caught in the crossfire
Re: Cartoon an ‘inversion of reality’ Oct. 9

October 10, 2024

Graeme MacKay’s Oct. 8 cartoon depicted the reality of what is now happening in Gaza and the West Bank. What happened on Oct. 7, 2023, is pure horror for the people of Israel and for Jews around the world. As for how it was allowed to happen, the Israeli people deserve an honest answer.

For Israel, when it comes to defending its people, that is totally understandable. What the gentleman from HonestReporting Canada has failed to see is, peace is something that is earned. In all honesty whether it is Hamas, an extremely violent terrorist group, or prime minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu — both have caused the deaths of thousands of innocent people. The failure to see what has happened to these people is unconscionable.

Margo May Taylor, Ancaster

Saturday September 28, 2024

October 1, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday September 28, 2024

Animated making-of clip here!

Netanyahu’s Escalation Risks Broader Conflict While Peace Remains Abandoned

December 20, 2023

Thomas L. Friedman’s recent analysis of the Israel-Hezbollah-Hamas-Iran conflict in The New York Times frames the issue as part of a global battle between a “coalition of inclusion” and a “coalition of resistance,” with Israel standing at a critical junction. While this perspective offers a compelling geopolitical narrative, it glosses over key realities on the ground. As Benjamin Netanyahu’s military offensive expands from Gaza to Lebanon, it seems less about securing peace and more about consolidating power through the elimination of key leadership figures in Hamas and Hezbollah. The harsh humanitarian toll and the escalating risks of broader regional conflict suggest a more dangerous path—one where peace is sidelined and devastation deepens.

Opinion: What This Israel-Hezbollah-Hamas-Iran Conflict is Really About

October 14, 2023

The insightful reporting by Ben Hubbard and Alissa J. Rubin in The New York Times vividly documents the devastating impact of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The relentless bombardment, aimed at dismantling Hamas leadership, has destroyed civilian infrastructure, flattened entire neighbourhoods, and displaced thousands. This is not a fight that ends with the death of key leaders; instead, it’s a cycle that perpetuates destruction, creating a new generation of anger and despair among Palestinians. As Friedman correctly notes, Netanyahu’s military campaign against Iran’s proxies is framed as part of a larger international conflict, but it’s also clear that this strategy is profoundly damaging to those living under fire.

Analysis: Facing a Big Test, Iran’s ‘Axis of Resistance’ Flails

Hubbard and Rubin emphasize the cost of this war not only in terms of lives lost but in the complete collapse of basic services and governance in Gaza. Hospitals are overwhelmed, water supplies are compromised, and electricity is scarce. Civilians bear the brunt of a war in which they have little say, caught between the militant tactics of Hamas and the overwhelming military power of Israel. Netanyahu’s military strategy may succeed in taking down Hamas leaders, but at the cost of eroding any prospects for a peaceful future in the region.

October 20, 2023

Netanyahu’s widening offensive in Lebanon, targeting Hezbollah in the north, risks expanding the humanitarian catastrophe beyond Gaza. Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah, now killed in an Israeli strike, was seen as a destabilizing force, but his death, like the toppling of Hamas leadership, is unlikely to bring about the peace Israel claims to be fighting for. As Hubbard and Rubin detail, the fear in Lebanon is palpable. The nation is already teetering on the edge of collapse due to its political paralysis, economic crisis, and a vast influx of refugees. Further destabilization from Israeli military actions could push Lebanon into outright disaster, echoing the ruin seen in Gaza.

Reader comments on Friedman’s analysis rightly point out the complexities Israel faces. One reader highlighted the entanglement of Israel’s military leadership with its far-right settler movement. Many high-ranking Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) officers come from these settlements, complicating any move toward a two-state solution or territorial concessions. The settlements—long supported by Netanyahu’s government—are not just political bargaining chips; they are deeply entrenched in Israel’s defence and security infrastructure. As one reader argued, Israel may be stuck in a “bear trap” of its own making. Any serious disengagement from the occupied territories risks not only international fallout but potential civil unrest within Israel itself.

November 10, 2023

The parallels Friedman draws between Israel’s regional struggle and the broader post-Cold War global order are illuminating but ultimately incomplete. While Israel is fighting proxies of Iran, Russia’s war in Ukraine is driven by similar attempts to resist Western inclusion. Yet, as one reader commented, America itself seems to be straddling the line between inclusion and resistance, particularly given the rise of populist, authoritarian-leaning movements at home. In this sense, the struggle between inclusion and resistance is not just an external geopolitical dynamic—it is one that many countries, including the U.S. and Israel, are grappling with internally.

Friedman’s argument that Israel can emerge as a stabilizing force through an alliance with Saudi Arabia overlooks the core issue of Palestinian sovereignty. While Netanyahu’s government seeks to normalize relations with Arab states like Saudi Arabia, the price of such an alliance—ignoring the plight of Palestinians—will likely prove unsustainable. As Ben Hubbard and Alissa J. Rubin report, the Israeli offensive against Hamas and Hezbollah has sparked widespread condemnation across the Arab world. Social media is flooded with posts calling out the destruction and human cost in Gaza and Lebanon. Saudi Arabia and other regional players may see the long-term benefit of aligning with Israel, but public opinion in these countries cannot ignore the ongoing suffering of Palestinians.

October 18, 2022

One of the key questions raised by both Friedman and the reader comments is whether Netanyahu has a plan beyond the military victories he seeks. The answer seems to be no. As one commenter noted, Netanyahu’s far-right coalition has shown little interest in pursuing peace or reconciliation with the Palestinians. The maps Netanyahu held up during his UN speech may reflect his vision of Israel’s place in the world, but their omission of Gaza and the West Bank underscores his government’s unwillingness to confront the realities of occupation and Palestinian statehood. Without a diplomatic strategy that addresses the core grievances of Palestinians, Netanyahu’s military victories will only be pyrrhic, ensuring more instability in the long run.

Hubbard and Rubin’s reporting, along with Friedman’s broader analysis, paints a picture of a region on the brink of broader conflict. The elimination of key leadership figures in Hamas and Hezbollah may satisfy short-term military objectives, but it is unlikely to lead to a lasting peace. Iran, which backs both Hezbollah and Hamas, will not simply abandon its proxies, and its response may come in ways that Israel and its allies are unprepared for. The risks of escalation, both within the region and involving global powers like Russia and China, are very real. Moreover, the humanitarian cost of these wars—particularly in Gaza and Lebanon—will only deepen the divides between Israel and the Arab world, making the prospect of normalization with Saudi Arabia ever more complicated.

While Netanyahu’s strategy may deliver tactical victories by eliminating Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, it is a strategy that comes with severe humanitarian costs and escalates the risk of broader conflict. True peace will require more than military dominance—it will demand a commitment to diplomacy, reconciliation, and a genuine effort to address the root causes of conflict, particularly Palestinian self-determination. Until Netanyahu and his government are willing to engage in meaningful peace efforts, the region will remain locked in cycles of violence and destruction. (AI)