MacKay - Canadian Editorial Cartoons
mackaycartoons

Graeme MacKay's Editorial Cartoon Archive

  • Who?
  • Copyright
  • Boutique
  • Kings & Queens
  • Prime Ministers
  • Presidents
  • The French Monarchy Project
  • DOWNLOADS

Vladimir Putin

Wednesday January 31, 2024

January 31, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Amid the escalating global tensions spurred by Vladimir Putin's threat, Canada responds passively, contrasting with the proactive efforts of Baltic nations and the UK, underscoring the urgency for Canada to match diplomatic initiatives with a more assertive and holistic approach to address the evolving security landscape.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday January 31, 2024

Unveiling Security Assurances for Ukraine Amid Escalating Global Tensions

Trudeau's government is failing to prioritize military commitments, evident in the protracted delay of the NASAMS defence system to Ukraine, raising concerns about national security preparedness.

January 11, 2024

As the world grapples with the escalating threat posed by Vladimir Putin, Canada finds itself at a crucial juncture, highlighted in Murray Brewster’s insightful CBC articles. The urgency of the situation is underscored not only by Canada’s draft of a proposed security assurances plan for Ukraine but also by the proactive efforts of Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania, as well as the urgent warnings from the United Kingdom.

Brewster’s coverage sheds light on the Baltic nations’ decisive response to the growing threat from Russia. Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania are not merely passive observers; they are taking tangible steps to fortify their defences. Discussions about building public bomb shelters, mandatory military service legislation, and even universal conscription reflect the gravity of the situation these nations perceive. 

Analysis: Ukraine is looking for more than bland security ‘assurances’ in talks with Canada, expert says  

March 23, 2022

Their efforts serve as a stark reminder that the threat posed by Putin is not confined to Ukraine but extends to the very borders of NATO.

In this tumultuous geopolitical landscape, the urgency of the situation is further emphasized by the United Kingdom’s proactive approach. General Sir Patrick Sanders, the head of the British Army, advocates for training a “citizen army” and being prepared for a potential land war in the future. The UK’s commitment to readiness acknowledges the evolving nature of security challenges and the necessity for a holistic approach.

Canada, on the other hand, seems to be lagging behind in both rhetoric and action. While a draft of a proposed security assurances plan for Ukraine is a step in the right direction, it raises questions about the overall preparedness and commitment of the Canadian government. The Baltic nations and the UK are sounding alarms, calling for a whole-of-society response to the looming threat.

Analysis: As Europe’s armies brace for war, allies call on Canada and others to catch up 

July 14, 2022

The proposed security assurances plan for Ukraine, as reported by Brewster, signals a diplomatic initiative. However, Canada needs to match its diplomatic efforts with a broader and more assertive approach. The distinction between “assurances” and “guarantees” in the plan becomes crucial, given Ukraine’s historical experiences with international agreements.

The world is witnessing a geopolitical shift, and Canada must acknowledge that its role extends beyond passive diplomacy. The Baltic nations are actively fortifying their defences, the UK is preparing for potential conflicts, and Canada cannot afford to be complacent. The global security landscape demands a proactive and assertive stance from Canada, especially given its position as a NATO member sharing a border with an increasingly assertive Russia.

April 21, 2023

Trudeau’s government should seize this moment not just to offer assurances to Ukraine but to demonstrate a commitment to global stability. The proposed security assurances plan is a starting point, but Canada must align its foreign policy with the urgency expressed by its allies. It’s time for Canada to wake up to the realities of the escalating situation, respond assertively, and play a meaningful role in safeguarding international peace and security. (AI)

With Apologies to Brian Gable

In editorial cartoons, the phrase “Apologies to —” serves as a humble acknowledgment and homage to the original sources that inspire artists. This tradition is rooted in expressing humility and recognizing the ongoing conversation within the artistic community. Cartoonists utilize this phrase with the hope of stirring familiarity among readers, and for those unfamiliar, broadening their minds and fostering a deeper appreciation for the craft of editorial cartooning.

Last week’s Duncan Macpherson homage didn’t go so well…

In today’s tribute, we bow humbly to the great Canadian editorial cartoonist Brian Gable. Known for his iconic contributions to the fabric of Canada, Gable’s work, including a cartoon immortalized on a postage stamp, captures the essence of Canadiana.

Article: Drawing to conclusions

My tribute to Brian (parodying James Gillray)

The borrowed image, forever enshrined in Canada’s cultural tapestry, features a beaver seated on a Muskoka chair, enjoying a beer and waving a small Canadian flag. According to Gable, the Canadian beaver represents the “little guy,” reflecting the spirit of the country with an image that is friendly and open to neighbours across the nation.

Brian Gable’s cartoons, characterized by their ability to bring smiles to readers, also serve as a powerful medium to communicate information quickly. Gable emphasizes the importance of editorial cartooning in holding political leaders accountable and introducing “a sense of oxygen into debate.” In a democracy, where debate is central, Gable sees editorial cartooning as having a vital role to play.

In a reflective piece upon his retirement in September 2023, Brian Gable shared insights into the unpredictable nature of his work. Describing the challenges of finding humour in tragic headlines, he highlighted the rarity of effortlessly creating insightful cartoons. Gable’s creative process, rooted in doodling and akin to alchemy, emphasized the intuitive and creative nature of cartooning. With a 35-year career contributing to the expression and exchange of opinions, Gable expressed a commitment to continue doodling in his retirement, embracing the uncertainty of where his pencil would take him next.

Audio: The complicated art of political cartoons, with Brian Gable

The tradition of “Apologies to —” in editorial cartoons is not just a nod to inspiration but a celebration of the rich tapestry of ideas woven within the artistic community. In paying homage to Brian Gable, we acknowledge the impactful role editorial cartoons play in shaping public discourse, capturing the spirit of nations, and leaving an indelible mark on cultural narratives. (Graeme MacKay)

Posted in: Canada, Cartooning Tagged: "with apologies to", 2024-03, Brian Gable, Canada, Defence, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, military, parody, Russia, security, UK, Ukraine, Vladimir Putin

Thursday January 25, 2024

January 25, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Donald Trump's persistent lead in the polls and the reduction of the GOP field to a lone rival, Nikki Haley, underscores his unassailable influence, depicting a party transformed under his strongman-like sway.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday January 25, 2024

Trump’s Unrelenting Grip: An Inevitable Ascent in the GOP Landscape

The GOP primary unfolds like a prehistoric drama, with Trump dominating as Trumposaurus Rex, and rivals like Haley and DeSantis navigating electability, competency, and the Jan. 6 attack as the circus moves to New Hampshire.

January 17, 2024

In a seemingly predictable turn of events, Donald Trump has maintained a consistent lead in the polls since the early days of the Republican primary, overshadowing a once-crowded field of contenders that included notable figures like his vice president, Mike Pence, Chris Christie, and Ron DeSantis. The emergence of Nikki Haley as his sole remaining rival is more a testament to political pragmatism than a genuine threat, as she lingers, perhaps awaiting unforeseen shifts in Trump’s circumstances.

From the outset, Trump’s dominance in the polls has been unwavering, showcasing a tight grip on the Republican party that extends beyond mere popularity. His commanding presence has reduced a field of over 20 candidates to a lone competitor, Haley, who appears resigned to an inevitable defeat. Her persistence may be rooted in the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s legal challenges or health concerns, rather than a genuine belief in victory.

The Republican landscape, once teeming with diverse voices, now echoes with the singular resonance of Trumpism. Former allies and potential contenders, including Pence, Christie, and DeSantis, have either withdrawn or been eclipsed by the enduring appeal of the ex-president. This consolidation of power is emblematic of a party transformed, where Trump’s influence extends far beyond conventional political norms.

Opinion: Donald Trump’s New Hampshire victory gets him closer to dangerous fantasy of a golden age

The escalating coarseness in Donald Trump's rhetoric, characterized by insulting nicknames and baseless claims, raises concerns about declining civility among his supporters and the potential for authoritarianism, as prominent figures, including Liz Cheney and Joe Biden, warn of the dangers associated with Trump's behavior.

December 9, 2023

Nikki Haley’s continued participation in the race, despite the near-certain outcome, underscores the unique dynamics at play. Her lingering presence hints at a party cautiously hedging its bets, anticipating potential disruptions to Trump’s candidacy, be it through legal challenges or unforeseen health issues.

While the inevitability of Trump’s triumph may dampen the spectacle of the primary, it raises critical questions about the state of the GOP and the enduring sway of its former leader. The polls, consistently favouring Trump, reinforce the narrative of a party firmly in the grip of a singular figure, shaping the trajectory of the upcoming election.

As the Republican primary unfolds with a sense of predictability, the true implications lie not in the absence of competition, but in the enduring dominance of a figure whose influence refuses to wane. The story of Trump’s unrelenting grip on the party may lack the element of surprise, but its consequences for the future of American politics remain deeply significant. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2024-02, China, Democracy, Donald Trump, goose, GOP, Kim Jong Un, North Korea, party, Republican, Russia, USA, Vladimir Putin, voting, Xi Jingping

Thursday January 4, 2023

January 4, 2024 by Graeme MacKay

Both former President Trump and President Biden have expressed differing approaches towards Ukraine, with Trump facing impeachment over allegations of pressuring Ukraine for political gain, while Biden has pledged continued support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday January 4, 2023

The West’s Commitment to Ukraine Must Not Waver

As Ukrainian President Zelenskyy urgently seeks continued U.S. support against Putin's invasion, the resistance from Republican lawmakers prioritizing immigration over aiding Ukraine underscores the disheartening politicization and potential neglect of a critical international conflict.

December 13, 2023

The West’s commitment to supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression and its growing fatigue towards this commitment is a grave mistake. It is crucial to recognize the strength that lies within the West and the importance of upholding our values, interests, and partnerships. The West must reverse course, abandon weakness, and stand firmly with Ukraine in its quest for victory.

Warmongering dictators pose a significant threat to their citizens and neighbouring states. However, it is the weak leaders who appease them that enable their aggression. Compromise and concessions are seen as weakness by these dictators, emboldening them further. Bad behaviour must be punished, not rewarded. Just as rewarding wrongdoing reinforces misconduct, rewarding bad faith actors in international politics only encourages further aggression.

The West’s response to Russian aggression in the past has been marked by weakness and appeasement. For example, after Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, instead of imposing devastating consequences, Russia was appeased. Concessions were made, and Russia faced limited sanctions, which only emboldened Putin to pursue a more aggressive foreign policy. The West’s feebleness was further highlighted when Russia invaded Ukraine, annexing Crimea and invading Donbas, right after hosting the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. The limited scope and scale of sanctions imposed on Russia and the rewards given to Putin, such as Nord Stream 1 and hosting the World Cup in 2018, only reinforced his belief that he could act with impunity.

News: Ukraine war: with stalemate on the battlefield Nato needs unity and commitment more than ever

February 24, 2023

The consequences of the West’s weakness extend beyond Europe. In the Middle East, the West’s inaction in Syria allowed Russia to intervene and support the Assad regime and Iranian terror proxies. This resulted in the loss of countless lives and the transformation of Syria into a narco-state. Furthermore, the West’s hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan, despite years of sacrifice and investment, showcased weakness once again and led to Putin’s second invasion of Ukraine. Failing to extinguish the fire in Europe risks setting the rest of the world ablaze.

President Joe Biden’s recent shift in supporting Ukraine’s bid for total victory to focusing on negotiations and territorial concessions is concerning. The West must not falter in its commitment to Ukraine’s goal of expelling Russia from its territory. The war in Ukraine represents a conflict of great power magnitude on the European continent, and its resolution will have significant implications globally. The West must provide Ukraine with the necessary support to strengthen its defensive position and deter further Russian offensives.

The West must recognize its strength and abandon acts of weakness that have only served to embolden dictators like Putin. Upholding our values, interests, and partnerships is crucial. The West’s commitment to Ukraine must remain unwavering, and we must stand firmly with Ukraine in its quest for victory. Failure to do so risks not only the freedom and prosperity of Ukraine but also the stability and security of the entire world. (AI)


Some moderated backnforth – occasional gleanings from social media – because why let time spent engaging and writing stuff go to waste?

From Instagram

Critic1: If Trump were still in office Ukraine wouldn’t have been invaded.

MacKay: Sure, and Putin would’ve returned Crimea under Trump. But didn’t. The Trumpsters are oblivious. Reagan is rolling in his grave.

Critic1: Putin doesn’t want Trump because Trump is likely to respond to any threats to the U.S. or our allies. He’s unpredictable. He won’t tell the enemy what his plans are unlike some traitors from his cabinet.

Graeme MacKay: …well, there’s that hokey narrative, that Putin fears Trump. In actuality, Trump is a pushover. Trump showed he cared not about Syria, nor Crimea, and he essentially cleared the way for Putin to make his move on Ukraine, which will become Putinland if Trump is elected.

* * * * *

Critic2: As someone who is from that area of the globe and pays a lot of attention to what happens there, you are either grossly lacking in information on the matter, or this is just shallow politics for the faithful, which, if that’s the case, my apologies for disturbing the preaching.

MacKay: Being practically scared to death as a kid in 1970s-80s all thanks to the fear of Cold War nuclear annihilation gives a certain awareness even to those of who aren’t from the USSR/East bloc. Decades of Putin’s criminality has been enabled by aloof western leaders, for sure, but the Russian people are ultimately to blame for their own aloofness over the years by allowing this monster to thrive. Putin’s tactic to cause misery on Ukraine as a means to divert attention from the criminal ways he’s enriched himself since 2000 demonstrates how he’s put his own people under a spell. If senseless meat grinder of hundreds of thousands of 18-25 year old “soldiers” won’t send Russians into the streets in outrage then one wonders about their complicity. Biden and Trump? They’re a sideshow.

Critic2: as someone who is friends with a person who smuggled Boris Nemtsov’s documents out of Russia after his assassination and is friends/works with Navalny etc, they (and I) would disagree with you that our presidents are a sideshow. Putin seems to take certain things into consideration before acting, two of which seem to be who is US president and the price of oil. In addition, without giving away too much, presidents have a lot of sway over funding of organizations that oppose Putin’s regime; when Biden became president, he cut funding to the ones I’m familiar with. He’s reversed that since, after the conflict started, but at the beginning his administration wouldn’t even communicate with them. Also, I understand the fear, i lived next to a soviet nuclear bunker as a kid, it was accross the street from my elementary school. At the school, we did nuclear attack drills and lessons about things like Pershing missiles. It was a different time.

MacKay: I’m not sure what we’re disagreeing on. That Trump would be better dealing with Putin? It would end the killing but it would strengthen his dictatorship.

Critic2: hmm, well, thank you for conveying to me that you are not interested in engaging with different perspectives.

MacKay: well, from your viewpoint who’s better for the world in terms of dealing with Putin, Trump or Biden? I ask because I’m dealing with Putin apologists on other threads. They tend to leave comments in tandem under critical cartoons.

 

Posted in: International, USA Tagged: 2024-01, cake, comments, concession, Democracy, Donald Trump, hypnotism, Joe Biden, Russia, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, war, world

Wednesday December 13, 2023

December 13, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

As Ukrainian President Zelenskyy urgently seeks continued U.S. support against Putin's invasion, the resistance from Republican lawmakers prioritizing immigration over aiding Ukraine underscores the disheartening politicization and potential neglect of a critical international conflict.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday December 13, 2023

Ukraine’s Struggle for Support: Zelenskyy Caught in Political Crossfire

March 1, 2022

As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy faces a critical juncture in his plea for continued U.S. support against Vladimir Putin’s invasion, the battleground has expanded beyond the war-torn Eastern European nation. Zelenskyy’s appeal in Washington, however, has encountered unexpected resistance from Republican lawmakers, whose priorities seem to be swayed more by immigration concerns than the urgent need to aid Ukraine in its fight for freedom.

President Biden’s request for $60 billion in new aid for Ukraine has hit a roadblock, with Republicans blocking a vote and insisting on tying the Ukraine package to border security measures. While House Speaker Mike Johnson claims solidarity with Ukraine against Putin’s invasion, he underscores the need for “clarity” on the U.S. strategy in Ukraine and emphasizes securing the border with Mexico as a top priority.

Zelenskyy’s closed-door meetings with Republican lawmakers reveal a stark reality: the focus seems to be more on hardline immigration measures than on standing in solidarity with Ukraine. The delay in approving Biden’s aid request puts critical assistance funds for weapons transfers and budgetary support in jeopardy, potentially leaving Ukraine vulnerable to Russian attacks.

Vladimir Putin's exploitation of the conflict in the Middle East, particularly his engagement with Hamas, serves as a calculated diversion from his aggressive actions in Ukraine.

November 10, 2023

The contentious link between Ukraine aid and border security measures echoes a disturbing trend in U.S. politics, where domestic issues overshadow the urgency of supporting an ally in a critical international conflict. Zelenskyy’s warnings of losing the war without adequate aid seem to fall on deaf ears as political maneuvering takes precedence.

The situation takes an even more perplexing turn with the involvement of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who, despite being a European leader, is viewed by some as a potential Trojan horse within the European Union. Orban’s resistance to EU funding for Ukraine and his questionable alignment with Moscow’s interests raise concerns about unity within the EU and its ability to support Ukraine.

Zelenskyy’s diplomatic journey faces hurdles not only in the U.S. but also in Brussels, where Orban aims to block Ukraine’s path to EU membership. The Hungarian leader’s various justifications, from alleged mistreatment of ethnic Hungarian minorities to concerns about Ukrainian grains affecting Hungarian farmers, paint a complex picture of political motivations.

November 11, 2022

As Zelenskyy navigates this political minefield, his plea for support becomes not just about Ukraine’s immediate survival but also about the broader implications for international unity and solidarity. The risk of becoming the face of a quickly forgotten war looms large if Zelenskyy cannot secure the necessary funds and commitments from allies.

In the midst of this political drama, the world watches to see if the urgency of Ukraine’s plight can break through the partisan logjam, and if leaders can prioritize the principles of freedom and democracy over internal political agendas. The fate of Ukraine hangs in the balance, and the decisions made in Washington and Brussels will echo far beyond the borders of Eastern Europe. (AI)

 

Posted in: USA Tagged: 2023-21, aid, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, military, Republican, Russia, Ukraine, USA, Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelenskyy

Saturday November 25, 2023

November 25, 2023 by Graeme MacKay

The Conservatives' rejection of the Canada-Ukraine trade agreement based on false claims of a carbon tax requirement is seen as a disappointing dog whistle to far-right supporters, raising concerns about Mr. Poilievre's leadership and commitment to democratic values.

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Saturday November 25, 2023

Poilievre’s Rejection of Ukraine Trade Agreement: A Disappointing Dog Whistle to Far-Right Supporters

Both Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau are contending with declining public support, faced with doubts about their leadership abilities and growing concerns regarding their electability and potential successors within their parties.

November 9, 2023

In a recent House of Commons vote on the Canada-Ukraine free-trade agreement, all parties except the Conservatives endorsed the accord. The Conservative party justified their rejection by claiming that the agreement would require Ukraine to impose a carbon tax. However, this claim is false.

Chapter 13 of the agreement explicitly states that the parties will cooperate to promote carbon pricing and measures to mitigate carbon leakage risks. Nowhere does it mandate Ukraine to impose a carbon tax. Furthermore, the Ukrainian government approved the wording of the agreement.

It is disheartening to see the Conservatives use this fictitious carbon tax as an excuse to oppose stronger trade ties with Ukraine. One can’t help but wonder if this is merely a political strategy to appease far-right supporters who lean towards Trump, deny climate change, apologize for Putin, and support the fringe People’s Party of Canada (PPC) led by Maxime Bernier.

Opinion: Pressed on Ukraine trade deal, Pierre Poilievre tells tales

August 9, 2023

The Liberal party may be attempting to paint Mr. Poilievre as a Donald Trump clone, as Trump and his supporters have shown an irrational fondness for Vladimir Putin and opposed aid to Ukraine. Interestingly, Maxime Bernier, leader of the PPC and a self-proclaimed MAGA wannabe, also opposes aid to Ukraine, suggesting a troubling alignment of views.

Mr. Poilievre’s eagerness to win back the support of the PPC and elements within his own base, while also showcasing his unwavering opposition to carbon taxes, seems to have overshadowed his support for a democracy under threat. This decision not only provides the Liberals with political ammunition but also raises concerns about his readiness to lead the country.

September 9, 2023

While the Ukraine vote might not have a significant impact on the upcoming election, it is crucial to focus on pressing economic issues such as inflation, interest rates, housing shortages, and overall economic competitiveness. Canadians are looking for solutions to the challenges we face, and it is disappointing that Mr. Poilievre seems to have turned his back on Ukraine at a time when he needs to demonstrate his leadership abilities.

Rejecting the Ukraine trade agreement based on false claims of a carbon tax requirement is a disappointing dog whistle to far-right supporters. It raises questions about Mr. Poilievre’s priorities and his willingness to stand up for democratic values. As Canadians, we deserve leaders who prioritize the greater good over political posturing.

 

Posted in: Canada Tagged: 2023-20, Canada, climate change, denial, dog whistle, far right, Maxime Bernier, Pierre Poilievre, Ukraine, Vladimir Putin
« Previous 1 … 7 8 9 … 24 Next »
...Check it out and please subscribe!

Your one-stop-MacKay-shop…

T-shirts, hoodies, clocks, duvet covers, mugs, stickers, notebooks, smart phone cases and scarfs

2023 Coronation Design
Follow Graeme's board My Own Cartoon Favourites on Pinterest.

MacKay’s Virtual Gallery

Copyright © 2016 mackaycartoons.net

Powered by Wordpess and Alpha.

DMCA.com Protection Status
Loading Comments...