security – mackaycartoons

Wednesday April 23, 2025

April 22, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 23, 2025

Canada’s Quiet Resolve in Strengthening Defence Amid Global Uncertainty

March 1, 2024

In the ever-shifting landscape of global politics, where alliances are tested and national interests recalibrated, Canada finds itself at a pivotal juncture. Recent events and political shifts have underscored a growing realization among NATO member countries, including Canada, that bolstering military capabilities is not just a response to external pressures, but a strategic necessity for a world where traditional security assurances can no longer be taken for granted.

The backdrop to this realization is a United States led by President Donald Trump, whose rhetoric and actions have raised concerns about America’s commitment to global security frameworks established post-World War II. Trump’s calls for NATO allies to increase defence spending to five percent of GDP, though seemingly about shared burden, mask a deeper unease about the U.S.’s role as a reliable security partner. Trump’s annexation rhetoric concerning Canada and Greenland, while alarming, reflects an unpredictable approach to international relations that has left many allies wary.

News: Trump wants NATO to spend 5% on defence. What do Canada party leaders say?

January 12, 2022

Canada, traditionally seen as a steadfast partner within NATO, has faced criticism for not meeting the alliance’s defence spending target of two percent of GDP. Yet, there’s a nuanced understanding emerging among Canadian political leaders. Both Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre have now committed to reaching the two percent target by 2030, aligning their strategies to ensure Canada’s sovereignty and security in an increasingly unstable world. This alignment signifies a shared recognition of the importance of enhancing military capabilities amidst global uncertainties.

This decision reflects a pragmatic approach to defence policy. Canada recognizes that in a world where the U.S. might retreat from its role as a global security guarantor, it must step up to ensure its own defence readiness. The focus is on modernizing the military, securing the Arctic, and investing in cutting-edge technologies like AI and quantum computing, all while maintaining fiscal responsibility.

News: Mark Carney unveils a plan to Trump-proof Canada

July 12, 2018

Canada’s resolve to meet NATO commitments “on its own terms” is emblematic of a broader trend among NATO members. Many countries are recalibrating their defence policies not just due to external pressures from the U.S., but because of the realization that global threats are multifaceted. The unpredictability of a U.S. administration dismissive of trade and military alliances only adds to the urgency.

In this context, Canada’s approach is both sensible and strategic. It is about strengthening defence capabilities while fostering unity and consensus among political leaders. The decision to bolster military spending is not about succumbing to external demands but about safeguarding national interests in a changing global order.

As Canada moves forward, the focus should remain on maintaining a balanced approach that prioritizes security, economic stability, and diplomatic engagement. By doing so, Canada can navigate the complexities of international relations with resilience and resolve, ensuring its place as a respected and reliable partner on the world stage.

PPs 2% Promise

I’ve been closely following Pierre Poilievre’s approach to Canada’s NATO obligations, and his recent commitment to the 2% GDP defence target by 2030 has caught my attention. Until last week’s debate, Poilievre hadn’t specified a timeline, often critiquing the Liberals’ fluctuating target dates between 2028 and 2034 over the past couple of years without presenting his own. Now, it turns out his target aligns precisely with the Liberals’ plan, even as countries worldwide are exceeding the 2% benchmark.

Interestingly, Poilievre’s decision to announce this commitment late in the campaign suggests strategic timing. It’s likely not a stance that would be met with overwhelming enthusiasm, especially within his own party, where it could be quite polarizing. Let’s face it, bolstering defence—even amid increased threats—isn’t high on the average voter’s priority list, particularly with the cost of living crisis intensifying as Trump ramps up tariffs.

This revelation suggests that Poilievre might not be as hawkish as many believed. His mealy mouthed attitude toward supporting Ukraine’s struggle against Putin tyranny is a chief indicator of this for another day. While he shares Trump’s scepticism towards international agreements and multilateralism, evidenced by his rare mention of the Paris Accord, his reticence on NATO commitments raises questions. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the need to strengthen Canada’s military, including against potential U.S. threats.

Historically, Canada’s Conservative Party has championed robust military and defence policies. Yet, in the era of Donald Trump, who demands a 5% GDP commitment to NATO, one might expect Canadian conservatives to follow suit. Instead, Poilievre’s proposal mirrors the Liberals’, aiming for 2030, which I find both intriguing and somewhat lacking.

While I often see parallels between Canadian conservatives and Trump’s Republicans, this divergence is significant. The traditional hawks within Canada’s Conservative Party appear to have less influence, a point worth noting. When it comes to defence, the differences between Canada’s two major parties offered to voters are strikingly similar.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for April 23, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

PPs 2% Promise https://youtu.be/7QXYW_dp024

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Wednesday April 2, 2025

April 2, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Wednesday April 2, 2025

A Leadership Misstep by Mark Carney and the Liberals

January 28, 2025

In the world of politics, perception is often as powerful as reality. The recent controversy surrounding Paul Chiang, the former Liberal candidate for Markham–Unionville, is a testament to this fact. Mark Carney’s decision not to immediately remove Chiang following his inflammatory comments about a Conservative rival reflects a troubling pattern of aloofness and indecision within the Liberal Party when it comes to addressing foreign interference, particularly from China.

Under Justin Trudeau, the Liberal Party has been criticized for taking too long to address concerns about foreign interference. Despite mounting evidence and public concern, the party’s responses have often seemed slow and insufficient. This latest episode with Paul Chiang only reinforces that perception. By initially defending Chiang, Carney missed an opportunity to break from the past and demonstrate decisive leadership in the face of a serious issue.

Opinion: It is astonishing – and reprehensible – that Paul Chiang remains a Liberal candidate

June 2, 2023

Mark Carney’s actions, or lack thereof, have highlighted a critical perception problem. His reluctance to act decisively against Chiang after the latter’s comments about turning a political opponent over to Chinese authorities suggests a continuation of past Liberal practices. This perception of aloofness and indecision does little to inspire confidence in a party facing an election where leadership and integrity are paramount.

Interestingly, an Abacus poll taken at the start of the election showed that concern for Chinese election interference ranked low among Canadians, not even making the top 10 list of issues. Instead, concerns about the cost of living, Donald Trump, healthcare, and housing took precedence. However, the Chiang controversy may thrust foreign interference back into the spotlight, challenging the Liberals to address it more robustly.

Polling: The Opinion Landscape in Canada Continues to Shift

February 25, 2023

On the eve of Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day,” the timing of this controversy could not be worse for the Liberals. While the issue may not have long-lasting legs, it represents a self-inflicted wound – a dumb move that could have been easily avoided with more decisive action. Carney’s failure to act swiftly and decisively against Chiang may not only hurt the party’s image but also cast doubt on his ability to lead effectively.

Moving forward, the Liberals, under Mark Carney’s leadership, must demonstrate a more proactive and transparent approach to foreign interference. This is not just about addressing past criticisms but about building a foundation of trust and integrity for the future. In a political landscape where the perception of leadership is critical, Carney and the Liberals must learn from this misstep and show Canadians that they are committed to protecting the nation’s democratic processes.

News: Liberal candidate Paul Chiang resigns over Chinese bounty comments

November 20, 2020

The fallout from Paul Chiang’s comments serves as a reminder that leadership requires more than rhetoric; it demands decisive action. Mark Carney and the Liberal Party must recognize this and adapt if they are to regain the trust of Canadians and effectively navigate the challenges ahead.

Liberation Day

Today’s message is a bit of a housekeeping note. For months, I’ve been sending out these daily messages along with an animated version of my editorial cartoon, while also keeping up with my regular activities. Honestly, I don’t think many people are seeing them. Figuring out how to use this platform between notes and posts has been a bit frustrating.

Yesterday was a beautiful day, with bright colours and Spring smells returning to nature in my part of the western hemisphere. Instead of following my usual routine, I decided to go outside and enjoy the fresh air. I encourage you all to do the same if you can.

I also made a personal change by deactivating my Facebook accounts yesterday. After 17 years with a personal page and an editorial cartoon page that had 6,000 followers, I felt it was time to step back. Will the tech giants notice I’m gone? No. But it has already given me more time and less distraction. Happy Liberation Day!

Here’s the animated version of my editorial cartoon for today:

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday March 20, 2025

March 20, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday March 20, 2025

Also Published in the Toronto Star.

Canada’s Defense Dilemma: Rethinking Reliance on Uncle Sam

January 11, 2023

For many years after World War II, Canada counted on the United States as a reliable ally, keeping our borders safe and secure. This close bond, strengthened by common values and strong trade ties, allowed Canada to focus on other important issues while relying on American military power. However, the world has changed a lot, and recent events make it clear that Canada needs to rethink how much it relies on the U.S. for defence.

News: Canada reconsidering F-35 purchase amid tensions with Washington, says minister

July 19, 2010

The presidency of Donald Trump has put a strain on this long-standing friendship. His administration’s lack of respect for trade agreements, like the USMCA, and the introduction of tough trade tariffs have put a dent in our economic relationship. On top of that, Trump’s unsettling comments about Canada becoming the “51st state” and his friendly stance towards leaders like Vladimir Putin add to the complexity. In this uncertain environment, Canada must carefully navigate its defence and security policies.

A major issue at hand is Canada’s plan to buy F-35 fighter jets, which has sparked a lot of debate. While these jets are meant to modernize Canada’s aging air fleet, relying on U.S.-controlled technology poses risks. The possibility that a future U.S. administration could deny necessary software updates for political reasons highlights the danger of depending too heavily on one supplier.

September 11, 2012

Canada must look at other options for defence partnerships and diversify where it gets its military equipment. The Swedish Gripen, for example, offers benefits like local assembly and less reliance on U.S. maintenance. This could help boost Canada’s defence industry and increase our independence. Building stronger defence ties with other friendly nations could give Canada the flexibility it needs in a changing world.

News: Canada must weigh risk Trump blocks software upgrades for F-35s: former official

October 2, 2014

While it’s important to keep a cooperative relationship with the U.S., Canada also needs to be ready for a less friendly neighbour. This means finding a balance between working together and being independent, ensuring Canada can protect itself if needed. Strengthening our own defence capabilities and investing in homegrown technology should be priorities to keep us safe.

In short, Canada is at a turning point in its defence strategy. We need to carefully consider the current global situation, our economic interests, and our national security needs. By broadening our defence partnerships and reducing our reliance on any single ally, Canada can better protect its sovereignty and security in these unpredictable times.

I’ve put together an editorial cartoon that captures the current state of Canada’s defence strategy, inspired by the topsy-turvy dynamics of our relationship with the U.S. Picture an F-35 flying upside down—a nod to “Top Gun.”

With Donald Trump’s disregard for trade agreements like the USMCA and his cozying up to figures like Putin, it’s clear Canada can’t fully depend on the U.S. as a reliable ally as we once did. Yet, cooperation is still necessary, even amid rhetoric about Canada becoming the 51st state.

It’s a tough balancing act. We need to decide whether to continue feeding the military-industrial complex or explore new partnerships beyond the usual U.S. ties. The cartoon aims to spark some reflection on how Canada can best navigate these challenges.

Please enjoy my making-of animated editorial cartoon for March 20, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Thursday February 27, 2025

February 27, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Thursday February 27, 2025

Posted to Politico Europe.

Extortion in the Guise of Diplomacy

December 5, 2024

In the annals of modern history, few nations have fought as valiantly for their sovereignty and democracy as Ukraine has in the face of an illegal and ruthless invasion by Vladimir Putin. As the world watches, Ukraine stands as a testament to the resilience of a nation besieged yet unyielding. However, in a disheartening twist of fate, the very country that Ukraine looked to for support—the United States—has engaged in a maneuver that reeks of extortion, exploiting Ukraine’s vulnerability for economic gain.

Under the leadership of President Donald Trump, the United States has shifted from a traditional ally to a transactional partner, placing a price tag on global security. The proposed minerals deal between the U.S. and Ukraine is emblematic of this shift, demanding Ukraine hand over a significant share of its mineral revenues in exchange for past military aid and vague promises of support. This approach transforms diplomacy into a mercantile transaction, undermining the principles of mutual respect and partnership.

News: U.S. and Ukraine Agree to Minerals Deal, Officials Say

June 15, 2022

Critics have rightly labeled this tactic as extortion. At a time when Ukraine desperately seeks security guarantees to fend off further Russian aggression, the U.S. has offered economic demands instead of concrete commitments. This power play has not gone unnoticed, with many viewing it as a neo-colonial expansion where economic interests overshadow ethical responsibilities.

The reader comments and reactions to this deal echo a collective outrage. There is a strong sense of betrayal and disappointment, as the world witnesses a nation that stood firm against tyranny being coerced into an unfavourable agreement. The absence of specific security guarantees further amplifies the perception that the U.S. is exploiting Ukraine’s plight rather than offering genuine support.

December 24, 2018

This scenario sets a dangerous precedent. If the world’s leading democracy can engage in such extortionist measures, leveraging its power to extract economic concessions from a war-torn nation, what message does this send to other countries? The fear is that this model of diplomacy—where security is bartered for profit—could be replicated elsewhere, including in regions like Canada, where strategic interests may one day be similarly exploited.

In this narrative, President Trump emerges not as a champion of global security but as a transactional leader, placing profit over principle. The notion of leveraging Ukraine’s mineral wealth for U.S. cooperation is seen as a shrewd yet ethically questionable move, one that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term alliances.

News: Ukraine outlines draft minerals deal with U.S., but touts no concrete security guarantees

October 26, 2024

As the world grapples with the implications of this deal, it is imperative to remember the cost of such transactional diplomacy. The fight for democracy and sovereignty should not be reduced to a mere financial transaction. Ukraine’s struggle and resilience deserve more than a price tag—they deserve unwavering support and solidarity from the international community.

The U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and moral dilemmas in international relations. It challenges us to reflect on the values we uphold and the kind of world we wish to build—a world where support for democracy is not contingent upon economic gain but rooted in shared principles and mutual respect.

Did Americans willingly vote to abandon being leader of the free world?

The U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal strikes me as economic extortion. While Ukraine seeks protection from Russia, the U.S. is demanding a significant chunk of its mineral wealth without offering any solid security guarantees. This feels more like a power play than genuine international support, with U.S. interests overshadowing true aid for Ukraine’s democracy. Under Trump, the U.S. has left a void in the world order, stepping away from its role as leader of the free world. For those of us who warned about Trump’s ways before his election last November, this is no surprise. Liberty, freedom, and the notion of a shining city on the hill no longer seem emblematic of the United States. Is this what Republicans voted for just three months ago? The world appears to be entering dark times.

Check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 27, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I share weekly editorial cartoons every Saturday morning. Substack is a crucial platform for me amidst the uncertainties of being a staff cartoonist, especially given recent layoffs and newspaper closures affecting our field. As long as I hold my position, subscriptions will remain free. Thank you for your support! This “note” helps craft my weekly posts and showcases animated versions of my cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack

Friday February 7, 2025

February 7, 2025 by Graeme MacKay

Editorial Cartoon by Graeme MacKay, The Hamilton Spectator – Friday February 7, 2025 (and The Toronto Star)

Canada’s Defense Dilemma

February 5, 2025

Canada stands at a crucial moment, caught between longstanding commitments to global security and the pressing need to defend its own sovereignty. As tensions rise with our powerful neighbour, the United States, we can’t afford to be complacent about our defence spending any longer. It’s time for Canada to swiftly enhance its military capabilities, meet NATO commitments, and ensure our national security.

For years, Canadian governments have fallen short of the NATO spending target of 2% of GDP. This isn’t a new issue, and responsibility lies with both Liberal and Conservative administrations. The Russian invasion of Ukraine, especially the 2014 annexation of Crimea, should have been a wake-up call. Yet, despite global threats, Canada has lagged within NATO, prioritizing domestic social programs over military readiness.

Under Presidents Obama and Biden, the U.S. reminded Canada of its obligations. But with Donald Trump back in the presidency, the tone has changed dramatically. His frustration with NATO members who aren’t meeting their commitments is clear. His threats to pull the U.S. out of NATO and talk of annexing Canada as the 51st state are not just bluster; they demand action.

News: Mark Carney outlines vision for protecting Canada against American ‘aggression’ and spurring the economy

March 1, 2024

The Liberal Party has offered different timelines for meeting NATO commitments. Defense Minister Bill Blair aims for 2027, while Prime Minister Justin Trudeau initially set 2032. Leadership hopeful Mark Carney has proposed 2030. This inconsistency creates confusion at a critical time.

On the other hand, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre hasn’t provided a clear timeline for meeting the NATO target. While he criticizes the Liberal government’s defence spending as inadequate, his reluctance to set clear goals leaves a gap in strategic planning. At a time when decisive action is needed, ambiguity weakens Canada’s position on the global stage.

Canadians must recognize that enhancing our defences isn’t just a response to Trump’s provocations; it’s a long-overdue acknowledgment of our role on the global stage. The geopolitical landscape is shifting, with Russia’s aggression and China’s assertiveness challenging international order. Canada must contribute meaningfully to global security to fulfill NATO commitments and protect its own sovereignty.

News: NATO chief says European defence without US ‘will not work’

July 1, 2023

While it may be unpalatable to divert funds from social programs to defence spending, national security is paramount. Defending the Arctic, controlling the Northwest Passage, and reducing reliance on U.S. military assets are essential. Projects like the Gripen fighter and domestic military manufacturing are crucial steps toward self-reliance.

The era of relying on U.S. protection is over. Canada must strengthen ties with like-minded nations, invest in its military, and present a united political front. As one reader suggested, a united approach where MPs work together on national objectives is essential. This collective resolve will show the world that Canada is serious about its defence and sovereignty.

Canada must act swiftly to increase military spending, not only to meet NATO obligations but to protect our nation against evolving threats. The lack of clear leadership and commitment from political leaders is a disservice to Canadians. We must prioritize national security, strengthen our defence capabilities, and assert our sovereignty with confidence and resolve.

I’ve opted to steer away from the latest spectacles surrounding Trump, such as his outlandish proposal to transform Gaza into a luxury destination dubbed the “Riviera of the Middle East.” While it’s tempting to engage in the Mara-Gaza mockery of such ideas, I believe it’s more productive to address the urgent issues facing Canada, which I’ve strived to do in my latest cartoon. This cartoon is designed as another instance in my repertoire of far-out concepts that you’ll seldom find another editorial cartoonist exploring. It whimsically captures Canada’s precarious position between the pressures of Trump and Putin, emphasizing the need for increased defence spending—symbolized by the beaver pointing to bottles of “Horseradish Defence” and hot sauce labelled “Military Spending.”

Canada faces significant challenges that require our immediate attention. With escalating tensions from Russia to the north and an unpredictable U.S. administration to the south, enhancing our military capabilities and ensuring national security has never been more critical. While meeting NATO commitments is important, we must also prioritize being prepared to defend our own nation.

Additionally, breaking down trade barriers between provinces is essential to foster a more united and robust domestic market. As highlighted in my cartoon yesterday, economic unity is vital for reducing reliance on volatile international markets.

Our political leaders have been vague about their military strategies, resulting in confusion about Canada’s defence plans. Canadians deserve clear and decisive action, especially during these uncertain times.

Though reallocating funds from social programs to defence is challenging, ensuring national safety must come first. A strong military foundation provides the stability needed for social programs to flourish.

Call me hawkish on this. I don’t care.

While it’s vital to remain informed about global issues, our primary focus should be on what’s best for Canada. We can express concern for international injustices, but our main priority should be protecting our sovereignty and addressing our domestic priorities with urgency.

In essence, while global distractions abound, Canadians must focus on the real challenges at hand. By strengthening our internal systems and preparing for external threats, we can secure a stable and prosperous future for Canada.

Please check out my making-of animated editorial cartoon for February 7, 2025, below! If you haven’t yet, please subscribe to my Substack newsletter, where I release my post every Saturday morning summarizing the week through my editorial cartoons. What you’re reading here is a “note,” designed to help craft my weekly posts and display the animated versions of my daily cartoons. Enjoy!

– The Graeme Gallery

Read on Substack